Usage of different versions of Oracle Server?

Is there any studies about percentage of usage of different Oracle Server versions available on the net?

In summary, is it possible to have different versions of NW Java running on the same machine? If so, what is the best practice and process for installing the new NW instance?
Yes, it is possible. You need to make sure that the hardware has sufficient resources (CPU, RAM, Disk space, etc) to accommodate a new instance, the system numbers and SID's are unique and the OS and DB are supported for the new system.
Regards
RB

Similar Messages

Incorrect version of oracle server or odbc driver

Hi friends,
I am using oracle database 11g ,i like to connect oracle database with my sage ERP accpac 5.6 , i connect with sage it show me the error "incorrect version of oracle server or odbc driver or odbc driver manager"
please anyone help me
Thanks

It appears the problem was that I had J2EE 1.4.2 and actually required J2SDK 1.4.2 i.e. the Standard edition rather than the Enterprise edition. Even though there are exactly the same files in the 'bin' directory in both versions. The installation now works.
Mark

Installing different versions of Oracle on the same server

We have a client that is currently on Oracle version 9.2.0.3. There is a project beginning that will have them upgrading to either 10g or 11g(still tbd). The project will have this happening in different steps. Therefore, we will need to continue to have the 9.2.03 db up and available while certain accounts are being migrated to the newer version.
Question is - can you install 2 versions of Oracle on the same server without any issues?
Or would we be better off purchasing a separate server to install 10g or 11g.

Depending on the OS certification you should be able to run both. You'll probably have to patch up the OS though. One of my servers has 3 different Oracle homes (9.2.0.5 - 10.2.0.2).
You can check the certification by clicking on the certify tab in metalink.

Issues with different versions of Oracle.DataAccess.dll

I have a .net web service application which references version 10.2.0.100 of Oracle.DataAccess.dll. A client has setup Oracle 10g database on the server, but I think the server has a patch set installed so it appears that the versions of Oracle.DataAccess.dll in my web service and on the database server do not match. When I issue a query via the web service on my local machine using my oracle 10g client, the web method returns the correct data. If I issue the same query using the same .net web service on the clients database server, I get the following error: Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleException: ORA-00923: FROM keyword not found where expected. There's nothing wrong with the query syntax, I can run the same query from SQL Plus on the database server and get the correct data. Could it be a compatibility issue between the Oracle.DataAccess.dll referenced in my web service application and the file on the sever. I'm not sure what else to look for, any advice is greatly appreciate, and I can answer any questions if needed.
Thanks,
NA

I would not expect an ORA-923 if your the Oracle client was not installed properly. I would expect an exception or a crash.
You can run an ODP.NET trace to find out what query is getting the ORA-923 by doing the following:
1) Shutdown web server on the machine that runs the webservice (middle tier),
2) In windows registry, on the machine that runs the webservice (middle tier), change registry value \\HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ORACLE\ODP.NET\4.112.1.1\TraceLevel to 1
3) Reproduce the ORA-923 only
4) shutdown webserver
5) Undo the registry value (set it back to 0)
6) In the generated file (c:\odpnet2.0.trc) do a search for "923", hopefully you can find it. Just before that error, you should see the SQL that was executed. This will obviously not be what you expect and will hopefully point you to the cause of the problem.

TRUNC() giving wrong data in different versions of Oracle DB

Hi All,
       I have two oracle data base versions. I need to insert into one temp table with select statement. When i use the same query in both environment am getting different results. Can you please help me on that.
Version:1
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Prod
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
Version: 2
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.5.0 Production
TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Productio
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production
Query we used:
insert into my_temp_table
select v_name,trunc(d_charge_date)
from table1;
my_temp_table structure:
v_name               varchar2(30),
d_charge_date     date;
Note: Date columns represented with mm/dd/yyyy format....
in table1 i have data like this....
v_name
d_charge_date
xxx
12/2/2012
yyy
10/23/2010
abc
9/29/2013
after the insertion into temp table am getting the result like below...
select * from my_temp_table;
If i run this query in version 1 am getting the correct data..
v_name
d_charge_date
xxx
12/2/2012
yyy
10/23/2010
abc
9/29/2013
but if i run the same insert query in version 2 getting the wrong data
v_name
d_charge_date
xxx
12/2/2011
yyy
12/2/2011
abc
12/2/2011
If i remove the trunc from the insertion statement i didn't get the wrong data like above...
I don't know the exactly reason. So can you please help me to identify this cause...

Hi i think the global temporary table having this issue in version b what i have mentioned above.
insert into /*+append*/global_temporary_temp
(v_policy_no,n_seq_no,d_next_chgdue_date,v_charge_freq,v_cntr_stat_code,v_iu_au_base,d_cntr_start_date)
select distinct a.v_policy_no,a.n_seq_no,trunc(a.d_next_chgdue_date),a.v_charge_freq,b.v_cntr_stat_code,c.v_iu_au_base,b.d_cntr_start_date
from table_a a,table_2 b,table_3 c
where a.v_status = 'A'
and a.v_charge_freq is not null
and trunc(a.d_next_chgdue_date) <= trunc(sysdate)
and b.v_cntr_stat_code in ('NB010')
and a.v_policy_no = b.v_policy_no
and a.n_seq_no = b.n_seq_no
and a.v_plri_code = c.v_plan_code
and a.v_parent_event_code = c.v_parent_event_code
and a.v_charge_pcode = c.v_charge_pcode
and a.v_charge_code = c.v_charge_code

Multiple NW instances of different versions on same server

Hello,
Our current landscape has two NW 7.2 Java AS instances installed on a single server. This solution works well for us, as one instance functions as our Dev server and the other functions as the QA.
I am looking to upgrade to NW 7.3 EP1. Is it possible to have different NW instances at different versions on the same machine? For instance:
NW 7.2 DEV (port 50000)
NW 7.2 QAS (port 50200)
NW 7.31 PRD (port 50400)
I've already attempted to install NW 7.31 Java as a New and additional installation on the server. Both methods have failed so far. I haven't dug too deeply into the logs yet as I wanted to get feedback from the community first.
In summary, is it possible to have different versions of NW Java running on the same machine? If so, what is the best practice and process for installing the new NW instance?
Thanks,
Greg

In summary, is it possible to have different versions of NW Java running on the same machine? If so, what is the best practice and process for installing the new NW instance?
Yes, it is possible. You need to make sure that the hardware has sufficient resources (CPU, RAM, Disk space, etc) to accommodate a new instance, the system numbers and SID's are unique and the OS and DB are supported for the new system.
Regards
RB

Deployment warning -- Compiled by different version of Weblogic Server?

####<Aug 23, 2001 12:17:54 PM PDT> <Warning> <EJB> <alpha> <admin>
<main> <system> <> <010004> <The EJB deployment named: registration
was compiled by a different version of the WebLogic Server.>
I'm using WLS 6.0 SP1.
I'm getting the above warning messages for every jar file within my
EAR file that I try and deploy. I can't figure out the source of this
warning. I get this message in any of the following compilation
cases:
* compiling with BEA's default javac (Sun's JDK version 1.3.0)
* compiling with Sun's javac (Sun's JDK version 1.3.0_02)
* compiling with jikes
The message seems misleading and doesn't make sense to me. Anyone
know why I'm getting this error message? Anyone else getting these
warning messages?
Regards,
JD

Mihir Kulkarni <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
Could you please post this message on the ejb newsgroup.
The message does not seem to mean a different version of the java
compiler, but different version of Weblogic's ejb compiler -
weblogic.ejbc.
Were these EJB's compiled by a previous version of ejbc, say, the one from
51 ?
No, these EJBs were never compiled against a previous version of ejbc.
They were only created and deployed with WLS 6.0 SP1.
Also, please check the generated file inside the build\ejbcgen directory:
WLGENERATED to check which version of WL ejbc was used to compile it.
Here's contents of the WLGENERATED file:
#Wed Aug 29 11:04:33 PDT 2001
WLVERSION=WebLogic Server Build\:\t6.0 Service Pack 1 03/04/2001
22\:05\:05 \#
101616\nWebLogic XML Module\:\tNot installed\n
JD
>
JD Fagan wrote:
####<Aug 23, 2001 12:17:54 PM PDT> <Warning> <EJB> <alpha> <admin>
<main> <system> <> <010004> <The EJB deployment named: registration
was compiled by a different version of the WebLogic Server.>
I'm using WLS 6.0 SP1.
I'm getting the above warning messages for every jar file within my
EAR file that I try and deploy. I can't figure out the source of this
warning. I get this message in any of the following compilation
cases:
* compiling with BEA's default javac (Sun's JDK version 1.3.0)
* compiling with Sun's javac (Sun's JDK version 1.3.0_02)
* compiling with jikes
The message seems misleading and doesn't make sense to me. Anyone
know why I'm getting this error message? Anyone else getting these
warning messages?
Regards,
JD

SAP different versions in iSeries server

Hi SAP experts,
We have a current SAP 4.7 installation in an iSeries server in PROD and in DEV machine. Is it possible to implement a new version like ECC6 using the same iSeries machine? Will the 2 installation for 2 different SAP version (4.7 and ECC6) possible in 1 iSeries DB server? If possible what do you think would be the impact to license and other aspects?
Hoping for your replies.
Thanks,
John

Hi John,
Yes, of course you can install multiple systems on one DB server. Licensing for the SAP systems should be independent of the host you are running on.
Although you are already aware of it and posted your question there, I want to point out for all others that there is a dedicated forum for this platform: [SAP on IBM i|SAP on IBM i]
Regards,
Thomas

Different versions of SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition

Some of our business processes still use SQL Server 2005 and I need to install Developer Edition on my desktop.
I have following downloads available in my MSDN subscription (other than Itanium):
SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition - DVD (English) - 1 DVD ISO
SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition - 64-bit Extended - 2x CD ISO
SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition - 32-bit - 2x CD ISO
The desktop is running 64-bit OS, so I definitely want to install 64-bit version. However, I am not sure what this "Extended" version available on CD-s is. Is this the only 64-bit version in existence? Or are there 2 different 64-bit versions
- "Extended" and "Non-Extended" (with non-extended possibly available on DVD - I haven't downloaded any images yet)?

SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition - DVD (English) - 1 DVD ISO
SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition - 64-bit Extended - 2x CD ISO
SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition - 32-bit - 2x CD ISO
The desktop is running 64-bit OS, so I definitely want to install 64-bit version. However, I am not sure what this "Extended" version available on CD-s is. Is this the only 64-bit version in existence? Or are there 2 different 64-bit versions - "Extended"
and "Non-Extended" (with non-extended possibly available on DVD - I haven't downloaded any images yet)?
SQL server 2005 is outdated so sorry if my answer is not to the point . First DVD version seems to me like installable which has both database engine and client tools present in it for installation
For second, SQL server 2005 installable was available in 2 CD's 1st CD was to install database engine/SSIS/SSAS/ SSRS features while second CD was to install specifically clint tools,books online legacy support . Its not possible to comment further without
looking at contents but I guess you can use 2nd one. CD 1 would have one part of installable and CD 2 would have second
And of course 3rd one is 32 bit of 2nd one.
Please mark this reply as answer if it solved your issue or vote as helpful if it helped so that other forum members can benefit from it.
My TechNet Wiki Articles

Connecting to different versions of Oracle from XI

I am using XI JDBC Reciever Adapter. In our landscape we have an external non SAP Oracle Application that works on Oracle 920 and another external non SAP Oracle App that works on Oracle 817. How can I specify in the JDBC Adapter to use a different Oracle client depending on the system I want to connect to.
Regards
Mike

Hi,
I think it is possible with JDBC Reciever Adpater Parameters like connection and Drivers..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/64/ce4e886334ec4ea7c2712e11cc567c/content.htm.
I did not try this.
BTW
But are you thinking about integrating with Oracle applications? If so you can not use JDBC adapter right ? because JDBC adapter is for Database connection. If it is an Oracle application, then you need to either go for Webservices or Oracle Application Adapters i.e 3rd party adapters .
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Moorthy

Dblink between different version of oracle databases

Hi Oracle Database Gurus
Is it possible to create a database link between 10.x and 11.x oracle database.
Could somebody pinpoint a passage of oracle documentation connected with that topic.
Regards
Zibi

zibi wrote:
OK thanks, but is there a documentation where we can find some constraints ???
ZibiRemember that there is nothing "magic" or special about dblinks. When using the link, the database in which the link is defined (source) is just another client to the target of the link. It uses all of the same tns pieces, and the constraints between versions would be the same as for any other client / database connection. So all you need to reference are the standard docs on what client versions are compatible with what db versions. Nothing special for the dblink.

Need to puchase seperate license for different versions of ORACLE

Hi,
My client wants to install Oracle 10G & Oracle 11G.
Does he have to puchase 2 license seperately for each of ORACLE versions?
Any prompt response would be highly appreciated!
Regards,
Geetanjali

The caveat before accepting licensing advice from some random fella on the internet: It should always be confirmed by contacting Oracle sales.
The main question is probably whether the client intends to install both versions on the same hardware or on separate hardware. One hardware = one license. Separate hardware = separate licenses.

Differences between different versions of Oracle Database 10 g

I have some questions about the Oracle Database 10g Release 2 that we download from Oracle web site.
1)Does the software that we download from Oracle web site is similar to Enterprise Edition or Standard Edition or Standard Edition One or to which edition? In other words, similar to which edition?
2)What are the differences between Enterprise, Standard, and Standard Edition one?
3)Are they any features included in the licensing Oracle Database that does not include in the free one that we download from Oracle web site?

The dowloaded software contains every of the four editions. You choose which edition you want during the installation process.
The differences and extra-cost options are described in this paper on OTN
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/oracle10g/pdf/twp_general_10gdb_product_family_0605.pdf

I want to install to different version on the same server

Hi all,
I want to install two different version of oracle on same server.
and Both should work parallely without disturbing to each other.
I know it is possible
But while installing what preliminary precautions I willl have to take so that it won't disturbed other running database.
waiting urgently for reply
Pramod

I would think as long as you set up separate staging areas for the two different versions that there should be no conflict. As always though - make sure you have good backups - maybe two.

Upgrade OM 2012 to SP1 Beta - Version of SQL Server for the Operational Database and the Data Warehouse

Hello,
When I try to verify the prerequisites to upgrade my SCOM 2012 UR2 Platform to SP1 Beta, I have these errors :
The installed version of SQL Server is not supported for the operational database.
The installed version of SQL Server is not supported for the data warehouse.
But when I execute this query Select @@version on my MSSQL Instance, the result is :
Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 (SP1) - 10.50.2500.0 (X64) Jun 17 2011 00:54:03 Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation Standard Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.1 <X64> (Build 7600: ) (Hypervisor)
But
here, we can see that :
Microsoft SQL Server: SQL Server SQL 2008 R2 SP1, SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2, SQL Server 2012, SQL Server 2012 SP1, are supported.
Do I need to pach my MSSQL Server with a specific cumulative update package ?
Thanks.

These are the requirements for your SQL:
SQL Server 2008 and SQL Server 2012 are available in both Standard and Enterprise editions. Operations Manager will function with both editions.
Operations Manager does not support hosting its databases or SQL Server Reporting Services on a 32-bit edition of SQL Server.
Using a different version of SQL Server for different Operations Manager features is not supported. The same version should be used for all features.
SQL Server collation settings for all databases must be one of the following: SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS, French_CI_AS, Cyrillic_General_CI_AS, Chinese_PRC_CI_AS, Japanese_CI_AS, Traditional_Spanish_CI_AS, or Latin1_General_CI_AS. No other collation
settings are supported.
The SQL Server Agent service must be started, and the startup type must be set to automatic.
Side-by-side installation of System Center Operations Manager 2007 R2 reporting and System Center 2012 Service Pack 1 (SP1), Operations Manager reporting on the same server is not supported.
The db_owner role for the operational database must be a domain account. If you set the SQL Server Authentication to Mixed mode, and then try to add a local SQL Server login on the operational database, the Data Access service will not be able to start.
For information about how to resolve the issue, see
System Center Data Access Service Start Up Failure Due to SQL Configuration Change
If you plan to use the Network Monitoring features of System Center 2012 – Operations Manager, you should move the tempdb database to a separate disk that has multiple spindles. For more information, see
tempdb Database.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj656654.aspx#BKMK_RBF_OperationsDatabase
Check the SQL server agent service and see whether it is set to automatic AND started. This got me confused at my first SP1 install as well. This is not done by default...
It's doing common things uncommonly well that brings succes.

Usage of different versions of Oracle Server?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for