Usage of FMBV in funds management

Dear Experts
Iam creating one po at the time the following message displayed
ITEM 010 2000 /4105200000/ COMMITMENT BUDGET FOR 2011EXCEED .
But i opened FMBV T code and gave funds management area, fiscal year and commitment item and funds and executed , the problem automatically solved . I dont know what is the relation this t code .
Can any one tell me the usage of FMBV Tcode in funds management ,
Thanks & Regards
Vijay Kumar

Hi,
FMBV executes a program to reconstruct AVC ledger for Former budgeting in FM (for BCS there is a similar transaction FMAVCREINIT). This transaction has to be executed sometimes in oredr to correct inconsistencies in budget control tables.
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

Funds Management-FMBV Run

Hi All,
Im doing Funds Managemnet Implementation.
Im in go live phase of implementation.All the configuration is moved to Production.Soon after the transport of configuration of Funds Management we had deactivated the FM throgh removing ticks in activate /deactivate button in SPRO to avoid errors in production.
Now i want suggestion that i have to run the transaction FMBV (restructuring budget).
So is there any effect if i will do before activating ?
Thanks
Deepa

closed

Fund managment exceeding the budgeted and committed items

Dear All,
In my client place we implement the fund management. we create the department wise fund center and related committed items.
For example for the Fund center Administration Expenses- Committed item is Advertising expenses. When ever i made the payment to that particular expenses if i exceed the budgeted amount it will though error .
Like this i am getting for the some of the fund center and commitment items. I am having department wise fund center and commitment items list of 50 under that for 25 fund center whenever i exceed the budget it shows the error message for the some of the fund centers it not showing any warning message. and also allowing to make entries so my fund center report is showing negative values. so please guide to solve this issue.
Regards
girija

Dear Alex,
in my client in Availability control limit
they send for
MSL MSL001 pb selected proceed ++ Action 1 usage % 90
Msl Ms002 Action 3 usage % 100
it is correct or not pl guide to solve this issue for half of the fund center and commitment item when exceed the budget it is through error but for the remaining fund center is is accepting.
Regards,
girija
Edited by: k.r.girija devi devi on Nov 13, 2009 5:14 AM

Funds Management-Replication to ECC-FPO Bdoc Error-Not known in CO

Hi All,
We have configured sap crm funds management integrated with sap crm campaign management.Below is the flow.
a) Create Fund Plan & Release it
b) Create fund for the fund plan above, post some budget, have some attributes like marketing org to determine in campaign & release it.
c) Assign the fund plan & fund to a campaign. Allocate some amount in the planning profile and release the campaign to create fund usages for the budget allocated. These fund usages will have some fund usage items which tracks how much amount each fund has been assigned.
d) Create some purchase requests and settle them in ECC and download the actuals to CRM which will create the appropriate fund usage for the same campaign as in c, capturing the settlement.
e) Run the accrual calculation program to calculate the accrual & then run the accrual posting program to post the accruals to ECC.
After step e, system creates fund postings with "posting transaction" as "accure" and which in turn creates CRM_FM_FPO Bdoc which gets transferred to ECC.
We are getting issues on this BDOC with error as " Object not know in CO". This error is being raised from ECC and when we debugged we found out that the external object id [Fund usage items, in the fund posting transaction or in the items of the BDOC] doesn't exists or not being created in controlling table iaom_ext_obj_inf.
By seeing these, in my opinion we seem to be missing some configuration or some important settings in either in MW or in Controlling in ECC.
Can anyone in the group please let us know what we are missing here ?
Thanks for your time.
Amol

Hi Chandra,
I've the same problem. I've checked the notes and all the settings provided in them are correctly set up in my CRM system.
Can you suggest another kind of solution?
Points if helps,
thanks a lot,
regards,
A.

Funds Management - AVC is not checked

Hello,
We have customized AVC & made settings for Actuals/Commitments usage @80%=Warning, @90%=Email to responsible person for Funds Center & if the Actual/Commitment usage crosses 100% of the budget, then system should give an error.
Inspite of the above settings some of the commitment items have already crossed the 100% limit without giving any warning message or error. It means, system is not checking the availability control.
Can somebody help in this regards?
Thanks & regards,
Chandrakant Lolge

Hi
Check the AA Derivtn and Update checkbox in Funds Management Government --> Actual and Commitment Update/Integration --> Activate/Deactivate Funds Management for the relevant FM area.
Regards
Dharmveer

System error in Funds Management update

Dear you,
Have anyone seen the following when updating FM from FI document:
"System error:Funds management update (FMRI, CHECK_WE_RE)"
Any ideas what to do?
Thanks
Sonja

Hi there,
The update problem occurs both if we try to post with FB50L or if I try to make a transfer of FI postings in FM. This all happens in the new installation where we plan to use new GL and FM.
This note you gave did not ring a bell for me
The error message is FI057. But we have not yet found a suitable note.
Therefore any ideas are still welcomed.

Funds management cube getting data from 4 ods, data not seen in cube

Hello all,
I am working on funds management cubes (0PU_C02 and 0PU_C03). These two cubes get data from like 7 or 8 ODS. Can someone tell me which are the ODS which feed to respective cubes. I have the mappings done but i am getting very confused.
In the ods 0PU_O44 there is RLDNR for Ledger and I can see that data in ODS but when i run load to cube I dont see the ledger data (its direct mapping there are no routines or rules).
Is there any sequence with wihic we have to load the data?
Thanks
Message was edited by: Raj M

Hi Raj,
I was going thru the forums who has knowledge in Public sector when i came accross ur forum.Can i get your email id..i have some questions to ask regarding student administration.
thanks.

|Funds Management - relating to PR/PO

I am getting another error in Funds Management:
Posting date must be used for update of value type 000100 update profile 50
Message no. FI_E008
Diagnosis
FM areas with assignment to the update profile must have all their value types defined as 'posting date' on the ledger level when activating to period-based encumbrance tracking (PBET) on the ledger level.
Procedure
Find all the FM areas using the update profile in transaction 'OF37'.
Use transaction OF36 to ensure that all value types in the FM area(s) are using 'posting date' for the ledger that is being activated to PBET.

Hi,
It's what the system says. You have to ensure, that you don't overwrite profile 0100 in OF36 with other date, than posting date.
Regards,
Eli

Funds Management cut over of Open PR and PO

Hi,
In case of cutover, we are using following link to update FM account assignment in open PR/PO.
SPRO>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management>Supplementary Account Assignment-->Select Documents
and
SPRO>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management>Supplementary Account Assignment-->Convert Worklist
1) But in this case, for open PO of which GR is not done FMRP_RW_BUDCON report is not updated after doing above mentioned process. when I make GR, commitment get updated in FMRP_RW_BUDCON report. This does not show actual status of budget consumption as budget consumption is shown at the time of GR only.
2) If GR is already done for PO and after doing above mentioned process, if GR get reversed then Negetive commitment shows in FMRP_RW_BUDCON report and after deletion of that respected PO, commitment of PO gets zero. But negetive GR commitment remains open which leads to wrong status of budget consumption. e.g. GR of Rs 5000 is reversed. Then report shows two documents as -5000 for GR reversed and 5000 for PO commitment getting open. IF I reversed this PO then PO commitment of 5000 become zero. but GR reversing amount -5000 still remains open. So it shows less consumption of budget by Rs.5000.
Do I am missing any process. Suggest.

Hi,
Firstly, after you convert the open commitments, you'll need to run FMAVCREINIT to reconstruct AVC. FMRP_RW_BUDCON will then reflect the converted commitments.
Secondly, based on your posting, it seems that you do not want PO commitments (VT 51) to be counted as budget consumption. You can achieve this in the ledger 9H configuration:
Public sector management > Funds management government > BCS > Availability control > Settings for availability control ledger > Define filter settings for commitment/actual values. You will want to exclude both value type 50 and 51 from ledger 9H. After you change the setting, you will need to run FMAVCREINIT again.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Ming

Error while Activating Activate Global Funds Management Functions (PSM-FM)

Hi,
I am getting the below error while activating Activate Global Funds Management Functions (PSM-FM) in Funds Management.
Aktivierung des Haushaltsmanagements ist nicht erlaubt
Message no. ZZ003
Kindly help me in fix this issue....
Thanks
Kishore

Hi,
Thanks for your reply. But can you clarify me why we need to delete the row Z_LEAVE in SE11 for FMISPS table. Because here ABAPER is objecting to do this as they feel there may be some impact if we delete this.
Kindly clarify me
Thanks
Kishore

Error while settlement of WBS - Funds Management

Hi,
We have maintain derivation rule as - WBS to Fund Center. This Fund center is DUMMY because we need not want to control WBS through Funds Management.
There is always one Cost center in each WBS. while settling this WBS we are getting error as -
Asset ABC 000127000000 0000: no subnumber with FM assignment DUMMY / /
Message no. AW851
ABC - Company code
000127000000 - asset number
DUMMY - Fund center
suggest.

alex ice wrote:
Hi, 1 change FC in AS02 to dummy if it applicable.
> 2 Check note 618269 it applicable.
> 3 remove FC from asset master data
Hi Alex, how are u!?
I've got the same issue than Harsh Vaidya in my system ...
Ive already read this notes: [618269|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/618269] (no apply to me, because Joint Venture Accounting isn't active), [844262|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/844262], [1473357|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1473357], [446029|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/446029] and [440396|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/440396]
All very interesting notes :P
But... I couldn't find the solution
I try to TRACE from FMDERIVE too, but when I go to KO88, FMDERIVE's trace doesn't track anything.
Any help to throw some more light on this thread, would be very useful.
Thanks a lot!
Regards from Argentine.

After Funds Management activation we got error in travel managment

Hi All,
After activating funds management in the system, while creating a travel request we got the following error. Anyone can help on this, for idenifying the problem.
In the travel request portal we are getting this error :
" com.sap.tc.webdynpro.modelimpl.dynamicrfc.WDDynamicRFCExecuteException: No expense type for estimated costs has been defined. Cannot save , error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE and No expense type for estimated costs has been defined. Cannot save , error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE "
regards,
Sabari Prabhu.

Hi
I have a question, I udnerstand in (Create one expense type "Estimated Costs") but my question is in using transaction
When you start using the trip transaction and select a travel request the system send you to the TP04 transaction... now
with this new function, I have to use the transaction PR05 its right? becouse the TP04 ask the VORS expense type, and sap says to dont delete record
Please could you tell me with wich transaction you start to create a travel request? I have the same problem of the screen but Im not sure to use the TP04 transaction wit this solution
Thanks a lot

Status of PO becomes F in fund management

Hi,
recently we have upgrade SAP from ECC6 to EHP4 and found some of the PO's Status becomes F in fund management, so we are not able to make service entry sheet and payment as system asking for further budget though actually POs value has not reduced fully.
Plz help to remove the status F from FM so that it can be able to make payment.
P K Sahoo

Hi, try to reconstract PO(I don't remember tcode, but you can find it in spro like M*4N)

PSM-FM-Reversal of funds management document after change in acc.assignment

Good day we recently went live with a component of Funds Management i.e. Availability Control on Cost centers and cost elements. We update BCS with the plan values and actual/commitment items in Finance/CO. We do our planning in CO.
The solution is working reasonably well but we have encountered a problem for which we are unable to find a solution. The problem is best illustrated with an example;
1. Create purchase requisition with Account Assignment Category "K" = Cost Center with transaction ME51N
2. Account assignment = cost center and cost element. A funds management document is created upon saving of the transaction.
3. Purchase Req. is released with a release strategy (transaction ME54N)
4. After purchase requisition release the account assignment for the cost element is changed by the user. This occurs sometimes during the execution of the business process.
5. When a purchase order is created with reference to this purchase requisition with transaction ME59N the system references the original funds management document which means when the account assignment was changed the funds management document was not reversed and a new funds management document created for the changed account assignment.
6. The BUDCON report transaction FMRP_RW_BUDCON thus displays the commitment under the incorrect commitment item as the change in account assignment is not reflected in Funds Management. We have a one to one relationship between cost elements/commitment items and cost centers/funds centers as per the derivation strategy.
My question is;
Is this normal standard SAP standard behavior or are we missing some configuration that will enable the creation of a new funds management document and if so where do we configure such? I must mention our solution is completely SAP standard.
Thank you in advance.
Best Regards
Mike Olwagen
Manager SAP Solution Support
City Power (JHB) (Pty) Ltd

Hi Mike, nice to meet you.
I think u should do an entire test with TRACE on, and u will find the problem, and how to fix it (at FMDERIVE of course).
First: Have a look at note [666322|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/666322], go to FMDERIVE and turn ON the trace.
Then, run all the process ... from ME51N to the end...
I agree with Eli, u must allow overwriting of existing values at FMDERIVE rule...
Regards,
Osvaldo.

Commitment Item in SD Billing document (Fund Managment) ECC6

Hi,
We are upgrading from 4.6C to ECC6 and have activated Fund Managment (EA-PS).
At the time of carrying out the Billing in SD we are getting a error that no commitment item available for gl account but if I use the same revenue account and create a FI invoice (FB70) then the CI is getting derived thru the derivation rules (Rule:CI from Cost Element).
I would like to know why the CI is not getting derived during Billing in SD module.
Thanks
SS

Hi,
Thanks for your message.
I have maintained a derivation Rule:CI from Cost Element, so that the CI will derive from this derivation rule.
As mentioned if I use same revenue account and create a FI invoice then the CI is derived as per the derivation rules but while carrying out the SD billing then the error comes.
Kindly clarify.
Regards
SS

Usage of FMBV in funds management

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for