Use of Cross-System Bussines Areas - ALE

Hi,
I'm cutomizing an HR and PY ALE scenario.
Does anyone knows how to use different values in Cross-System Bussines Areas.
I did it, and to send Master Data IDOCs it works perfect, it makes the conversion. But when I do the payroll run, it does not convert the value. So maybe I'm not doing the right customizing in OBB7 transaction or maybe this is not possible.
I would appreciate all your help.
Regards
Edith Cuellar

hi
From my knowledge , you can create the order in different planning plant ,but every time you have specify the planning plant while creating the order. in this way the cost will be captured at the 2000 company code.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/5b/ae2ea34b8611d182ba0000e829fbfe/content.htm
also you can create separate work center for that plant do the billing according to the job performed
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/05/e2eb106f0a11d2a5aa0060087a7a74/content.htm
Regards
Thyagarajan

Similar Messages

  • Cross-System Depreciation Area Transfer

    Hi,
    I need to execute inter-co asset transfer between COD that have different depreciation areas.
    For eg,
    COD 1 - book depreciation area 01, tax depreciation 02
    COD 2 - book depreciation areas 01, US tax depreciation 10, 11,12,13
    Can anyone advise how do I configure the above? The transfer to book area should be using gross method and to tax area should be net method.
    Thank you.

    HI,
    Following are the steps required for the configuration as per your requirement
    1. define cross syteme depreciation area for both book of depreciation and tax of depreciation  in each company company code and as per the requirement mentioned check tax depreciation area  in COD 1 whethere any functionality (properties)of the tax  depreciation area mentioned in COD2 ma tches if it matches then we can mapp the cross system depreciation area to that particular depreciation area.
    2. check comapny id : whether it is legal entitiy( company code assigned to same company)
                                         whether it is independent legal entity ( company code assigned to different company)
    3. create transfer variant  enter the cross system depreciation area and mentioned transfer method( 1- gross method 2- nett method) and mention the transaction type one for retirement and acqusition resp  and mention the transaction type fro prior acq and current year acqsition.

  • Outbound error "No cross-system business area has been assigned to bu. area

    Hi  everyone,
    i have idoc failed in outbound  with error No cross-system business area has been assigned to business area 0001
    Thanks in advance
    Soufiene

    Hi  Fernando,
    The issue is from HR ,  an entry for an employee was entered and suppose not it generated idoc failed.
    Thanks
    Soufiene
    Edited by: Soufiene Tchantchane on Sep 7, 2011 10:32 PM

  • Cross system depreciation area

    We are facing a production issue while transferring assets between two company codes . Each company code is assigned to diffreent chart of depreciation with different depreciation areas.
    Now we have to define cross system depreciation area to resolve this issue.
    Could you let me know what are the config stps involve in changing to corss system depreciation area.
    Alos if anyone has document on this please forward it.
    Thanks

    HI,
    Following are the steps required for the configuration as per your requirement
    1. define cross syteme depreciation area for both book of depreciation and tax of depreciation  in each company company code and as per the requirement mentioned check tax depreciation area  in COD 1 whethere any functionality (properties)of the tax  depreciation area mentioned in COD2 ma tches if it matches then we can mapp the cross system depreciation area to that particular depreciation area.
    2. check comapny id : whether it is legal entitiy( company code assigned to same company)
                                         whether it is independent legal entity ( company code assigned to different company)
    3. create transfer variant  enter the cross system depreciation area and mentioned transfer method( 1- gross method 2- nett method) and mention the transaction type one for retirement and acqusition resp  and mention the transaction type fro prior acq and current year acqsition.

  • Business area in Cross System

    Hi,,
       Kindly tell me while we run WE05 for IDOC List then we get the message No cross system business area has been assigned to business area BA11
        Send me urgent solution.
    With Regards,
       Samrat

    The business area has to be assigned to a Cross-system business
    area in your ALE-customizing.  This can be done via the customizing path:
    Call transaction SALE
    -> Modelling and implementing Business Processes
       -> Cross-Application settings
          -> Global Organizational Units
            -> Cross-system business areas
    Good luck, Kyoko

  • Cross System Lock using for roles?

    Hi everybody,
    maybe one of you can support me or have some experiences in case of using the Cross System Lock. We are checking the possibilty to implement the Cross System Lock (using in ChaRM, Scenario E (/TMWFLOW/Config_Lock).
    First of all, we made a successful test in usage of table content.
    Example:
    You save a table modification in a Transport Request generated in ChaRM. Thus, the Transport Request is buffered in a Change Document. The result is that the table modification is locked in the object-monitor (/TMWFLOW/LOCKMON).
    However, you save a role (pfcg) in a Transport Request generated in ChaRM the included objects in this role are not buffered in the object-monitor (/TMWFLOW/LOCKMON)
    Thanks for your answers!
    Best regards
    Joachim Eichner

    If you use the report TMW_TRKORR_LOCK_UPDATE against the role transport after saving your changes in it, this will register the role objects in the CSOL.
    The Role transport tool does not automatically trigger the FM that registers the objects in the CSOL, just like manually adding objects to a transport doesn't trigger it. Therefore the workaround is to run this report. Only the transport owner is allowed to run TMW_TRKORR_LOCK_UPDATE.
    In our experience it is not that CSOL does not support roles and authorizations; for the purpose of retrofit, it is able to detect conflicts reliably if the report is run consistently after saving role changes to transport. If no conflicts exists, auto-import works fine. If conflicts exist, then roles must be manually retrofitted.

  • Set Cross system company code

    Does anybody know what is Set cross-system company code?
    Regards,

    Hi
    This is more of ALE related. see below notes from SAP
    ===============================================
    Cross-system company codes are used in the distribution in financial accounting. There is exactly one central system for each cross-system company code in the distributed environment. One company code has to be assigned to this cross-system company code on each system involved in the distribution.
    When sending an IDoc with company code-dependent data, the company code is replaced with the cross-system company code in all company code fields. When receiving this kind of IDoc the reverse conversion takes place on the target system.
    In this section you maintain the cross-system company codes and allocate them to the local company codes.
    Recommendation
    The use of cross-system company codes and business areas in distributed financial accounting is a provisional measure. SAP reserves the right to replace this in a future release with a tool that allows a conversion for all the organizational units of the SAP system.
    Therefore SAP recommends that you choose consistent identifiers for the company code and the cross-system company code.
    Activities
    1. Create a cross-system company code.
    2. Assign the cross-system company code to a chart of accounts to which it is also assigned on the central system.
    This setting is needed on the decentral systems in order to determine the chart of accounts of the company code on the central system.
    3. Assign cross-system company codes to the local company codes.
    Specify the identifiers of the relevant cross-system company codes for each of the individual company codes.
    ========================================================
    Thanks
    Ashok - Assign points to say thanks

  • Cross system object locking -Object editor popup does not show in dev sys

    Hi ,
    we want to use the cross system locking for r/3 system .
    we have done all the configuration required for cross system object locking in central solution manager system and also in development r/3 system .
    also we observed that object lock information is avaible in central lock monitor transcation but when ever there is object lcok it does not show us the the popup for object editing. 
    appreciate your valuable inputs.
    Regards,
    Amar Kamat

    We found the problem.
    The structure was being locked by a user in the QA system and overnight the M version finally activated after another transport attempt. 
    The second structure with this problem was only referenced as a local object (even though it had a proper tech name and package assignment) preventing its activation in the QA system.  We needed to hack the query tables to make it look like a proper global structure, then re-transported and it activated.

  • ALE configuration, Assign Company Code to Cross-System Company

    Hello all,
    I set up and configured ALE so that we can keep our production, QA, development master data in sync.  I activated the change pointers for the particular message type for which we want to create IDOCs when new master data is created, or existing master data is changed.  IDOCs are then sent to the QA and development systems.
    Are these three ALE configurations associated with anything outside of ALE?  Is there any area that can or will be affected by these three configuration settings?
    Transaction <b>SALE</b>
    <b>Cross-System Company Codes</b>
         - all Company codes in our system
    <b>Assign Cross-System Company Code to Chart of Accounts</b>
         - all Company codes are associated with the one chart of accounts
    <b>Assign Company Code to Cross-System Company</b>
    -     global company code is the same as the company code
    Thanks
    Bruce

    In T.Code: OX19 - Assign company code to controlling area
    Please check that if for ur Controlling Area, the
    Currency Type:
    Currency:
    Currency Type
    10     Company code currency
    20     Controlling area currency
    30     Group currency
    40     Hard currency
    50     Index-based currency
    60     Global company currency
    Currency
    required code of Currency
    Should/Are properly maintained in OX19.
    This type of error will be for this stage itself.
    Provide points if satisfied
    Regards
    Dinakar
    SAP will be throwing this type of messages when
    Differing currencies: USD - CAD
    Message no. KT276
    Diagnosis
    The system makes consistency checks during assignment of a company code to a controlling area as part of assignment control.
    The same checks take place if assignments already exist and you change the basic data in the controlling area, or if you define the controlling area and company code as a 1:1 structure.
    If the check finds an error, the system cannot execute the function ("Assign" or"Change basic data"). If you do not maintain the required data for the consistency check (such as currency, chart of accounts, or fiscal year variant in the company code), this also results in an error message.
    You want to use currency type USD. The SAP System determined the company codes assigned to controlling area CAD and the relevant currencies. One discrepancy occurred in one of the currencies.
    Note
    A precondition for currency type "10" is that all company codes assigned to the controlling area must use the same currency.
    A precondition for currency types "40" and "50" is that all company codes assigned to the controlling area must belong to the same country or use the same hard currency or index-based currency.
    A precondition for currency type "60" is that all company codes must belong to the same company or all the companies must use the same currency.
    Procedure
    Change the currency type or the currency settings.

  • IDocStatus:Error in ALE service Cross-system company code does not exist

    HI All,
    I am sending CREMAS04 IDOC from XI to one R/3 system,and in R/3 a vendor should get created in master table.
    My IDOC is getting posted successfully but in R/3 system I am getting error that
    IDoc: 0000000000705816 Status: Error in ALE service
    T100 Text: Cross-system company code XXX does not exist
    I have created partner profiles in receiver system and in partner profiles I have set the process code as CRE1.
    Please help me to resolve this problem.

    Hi Shweta
    Have you checked with the data i.e. company code .
    May the company code which you are passing is not there in ur receiver system.
    Just check it out.
    Regards
    -Mitesh

  • Cross-system stock transfer order (cross CC and without using APO)

    Dear experts,
    I want to set up a stock transfer order scenario cross two SAP systems (and cross company code).
    The examples given in SAP documentation point to scenarios using a joint APO system.
    At the same time the documentation reads:
    The number of process variants is a result of the combination of system landscapes and organizational units:
    - with or without joint SAP APO
    Does anyone in here have experience in setting up this scenarion without using APO system and could help me with a process flow and the IDOC sequence used for this?
    Thanks and regards
    Norbert

    Hi,
    and thanks for looking into this.
    No, I do not have an APO (company is using JDA/manugisitcs) and I want to set up cross system STO between two ECC 6.0 systems directly.
    I do have a number of idocs running between the systems already and also know the place where to configure a plant for cross system goods flow.
    What I would like to know is if this scenario is supported at all and if yes, what is the sequence of idocs and and what are their triggers (in other words - the technical side of the business process) .
    Best regards
    Norbert

  • What are the pros and cons of using a port system.

    Hello All,
    I'm a new explorer in the OS X UNIX world, and have installed macports, and, for the most part, succeeded in building and using a number of scientific applications.
    I have noted a somewhat negative attitude by some on the use of port systems, while others seem quite content with them.
    When making my decision to use macports, these "selling points" seemed desirable to me:
    ¤ Confines ported software to a private “sandbox” that keeps it from intermingling with your operating system and its vendor-supplied software to prevent them from becoming corrupted.
    ¤ Allows you to create pre-compiled binary installers of ported applications to quickly install software on remote computers without compiling from source code.
    Especially the first point seems valuable, but am I deluding myself? Or, am I losing functionality/ flexibility? Or, am I just missing out on manually installing lots of dependents?
    _I'm not trying to start a feud, here._
    I'm just looking for some pointers (preferably well-substantiated) from those more knowledgeable than me, before I am any further committed to a choice I might later regret.
    Thanks,
    PWK

    The biggest drawback/complaint I have is that you're bound by the implementation/installation policy of whoever built the port.
    For example, take the installation issue - all software gets installed into some specific directory which is great one one hand - fewer compatibility issues with conflicting versions from what Apple provide. The downside, though, is that nothing on your machine will use these versions unless/until you tweak them.
    For example, maybe you want to install the MacPorts version of PHP, great, but the standard Apache won't use that, so you either need to install the MacPorts version of Apache, or tweak your Apache installation to use the non-standard PHP version.
    Well, what about PATHs, I hear you ask? well, sure, you could prepend the MacPorts/fink/whatever directory to your $PATH, but then you always use the MacPorts/fink/whatever version of any installed software which might not be what you want.
    This becomes more of an issue in a multi-server environment where you have multiple systems that all need tweaking/maintaining - nothing worse than setting up a new server by copying an existing installation, only to find that it depends on MacPorts/fink/whatever being installed.
    The corollary to this is that these package managers often install ancillary software that you do not need, nor want. It might have improved since I last looked, but installing either MacPorts or fink, for example, installs whole new versions of perl, GNU tools (gzip/gunzip, etc.), curl, and more - they even install new copies of openssl/ssh.
    I don't want these. These already exist on my system so what are they needed for? Why can't they use the standard copies? Are they 'tweaked' in some way? How? why?
    The secondary issue is that you are limited to the port's implementation - especially compile options - which may not be ideal for your machine.
    Unlike most GUI-based software, much open-source software uses compile-time options to configure the executable. Now the port installer might do a reasonable job of tweaking the installation, but it's not psychic so there will be cases where you end up with sub-optimal installations. Sure, they might work well enough, but that doesn't beat knowing what those options are up-front and building your own.
    Now there have been cases where I've tried to install software and almost given up when faced with a daunting list of dependencies (try RRD, or PHP w/ GD, for example) and have almost given up, but when you succeed the satisfaction of getting it working, plus the fact you now know how to do it counts for a lot.
    Now, do I wish that Apple would do a better job of keeping up with the latest versions of the open source software they include in Mac OS X? absolutely - isn't that what Software Update is all about??). But I also wish the port maintainers would spend more of their time updating the original source configure and make scripts to incorporate whatever changes they're making to the code so that Mac users can easily use the same source distribution as other UNIX flavors.
    And right there is the final rub IMHO - all the while the port managers create their distributions of common tools Mac OS X is treated like a poor step-child that's kept in the cellar. OK, maybe not that bad, but there's no reason why anyone who wants to install open source software on a Mac should need much more than:
    (download>
    ./configure
    make
    sudo make install
    it really isn't all that hard. Too often the port managers perpetuate the myth that Mac OS X is too different from other UNIX systems to work with the standard tools that everyone else knows.
    Now, maybe I'm also too old for this game since you always downloaded and built tools yourself when I started, and maybe package managers on Linux (which may have the same issues I've complained about) have helped elevate Linux in the mindset of a younger generation who are looking for a quick fix. All I can say to that is…
    GET OFF MY LAWN! :-D

  • How can I file share with another person if both of us are using Mac operating systems?  Do we need to use a third party file sharing system or does apple have this capability?

    How can I file share with another personif both of us are using Mac operating systems (one of us using a Mac laptop and the other using iMac).  Our intention is to have a working document that can be changed by both parties over time and both parties will have visibility to the others changes.

    Use SugarSync

  • When I try to load Indesign, an error message appears: "the exploitation system you are using is no longer taking responsibility with Indesign". What can I do to load the software?

    When I try to load Indesign, an error message appears: "the exploitation system you are using is no longer taking responsibility with Indesign". What can I do to load the software?

    Do you have a license for InDesign?

  • Could you please let me know if Flash Player will inform a user that his system requirements are insufficient when trying to use a given version of Flash Player?

    Hi,
    Could you please let me know if Flash Player will inform a user that his system requirements are insufficient when trying to use a given version of Flash Player?
    Regards

    It depends, but in general, no. 
    The guidance on minimum system requirements is mostly about what we will and won't fix bugs for.  Flash Player probably works on Windows Server 2000, and we're not going to intentionally break it or prevent you from installing it, but we're also not going to fix it if it breaks.  In instances where it's going to crash on launch or have some other horrendous out-of-box experience, like attempting to install on a PowerPC Mac, then we'll prevent the installation outright.

Maybe you are looking for