User access Autherization

Hi,
is it possible to create user access authorization for the particular storage location. E.g. plant 1000 has 1001 and 1002 storage locations and user A have to be given the authorization only for location 1001. if this is possible pls explain me how should I do it.
Tks
Sujith

hi
check this authorization object
M_MSEG_LGO

Similar Messages

Can multiple XP users access the same iTunes library?

Because I'm having a REALLY hard time getting that to work at all. I've moved my entire iTunes folder into 'Shared Documents' so that all users should be able to access it and changed the option in iTunes Preferences to the correct 'all users' path, but iTunes still tries to find the info in 'my' (sal's) documents instead of 'all.'
Anyone figure this out, or does it somehow break the EULA and isn't supported? The wife and I just want to use the same library since we're on one computer. Seems silly to not allow a user with admin rights to allow other users access.
Thanks,
Sal
Windows XP

Sal,
As this article in the Apple Knowledge Base explains the trick is to move the iTunes Music folder, not the entire iTunes folder, to "a publicly accessible location" and I believe they mean to suggest C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Documents\My Music as a good place.
It is important that the iTunes Library files remain in Sal's Documents and Sal's Wife's Documents.

Multiple simutaneously logged in users accessing AFP home directories?

Hi,
Many of our problems are described in this guy's blog:
http://alblue.blogspot.com/2006/08/rantmac-migrating-from-afp-to-nfs.html
The basic capability we want is to have multiple simultaneously logged in users to have access to their AFP mounted home directory, which is configured in a sane, out-of-the box setup using WGM and Server Admin.
Multiple user access could take the form of FUS (fast user switching), or simply allowing a user to SSH into a machine that another user is already logged into and expect to be able to manipulate the contents of her home directory.
From my extensive searches, I have no reason to believe this is currently possible with 10.4 Server and AFP.
(here's the official word from apple: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25581)
I've read that using NFS home directories will work, though.
I want to believe that Apple has a solution for this by now (it's been almost a year since we first had difficulty), or at least a sanctioned workaround. If Apple doesn't have one, maybe someone else has come up with something clever. I find it hard to believe that more people haven't wanted this capability! (not being able to easily search the discussion boards doesn't help, though...)
Thanks for your help!
Adam

Parallels Issue. Track at http://forum.parallels.com/showthread.php?p=135585

Service Desk User access

Hi Experts,
I want my service desk users login on Solman and they can update Msg status and ther remarks.
so what are auth. object needs on there profile, please suggest.
Can we block users access in such a way , they are not able to do add change on other users issue msg.
bcoz , if i give access on crm_dno_monitor to any user, he may access and process all issue tickets.
Thanks
Andrew

Andree,
Actually we provide variants for crm_dno_monitor.
so they have option of seeing only tickets belonging to themselves only
For e.g create a variant of crm_dno_monitor by choosing mine and then save it and create a ztcode in se93 for the same.
assign this tcode for the user menu to the respective role of the user.
So whn this user logs in and click on the link he sees only mine tickets or tickets belonging to him..he doesnt hav access to crm_dno_monitor.
Pls assign pts.

How to set up reverse proxy to allow user access portal site from internet

Hi all,
I have installed 10g(10.1.2.0.2) AS on same machine(single IP for both mid and infra with different users respectively). there is a DMZ on which windows IIS is working through which we need to redirect the request to application server such that users access portal page from internet (within intranet all URLs are working fine). I have went through technet documentation where i found 3 ways : through this link
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14099_19/core.1012/b13998/variants.htm
Section 9.2.1.1, "Configuring OracleAS Web Cache as a Reverse Proxy"
Section 9.2.1.2, "Configuring the Oracle HTTP Server as a Reverse Proxy"
Section 9.2.1.3, "Configuring Internet Information Services as a Reverse Proxy"
I am confused to which option to use. Also i went through the metalink document 270160.1
Please help me which option to choose to do this.
Thanks.

Hi Hozy,
May be it's too late, I am thinking to go in the same route for our sap portal access to external customers. Please can you share your experience , like what are the challenges have you faced? what is the complexity? what are all the resources we need to configure this?
I appreciate your feedback.
Thanks
Krish

How to trace an user access

Even if I've got no DBA permission (for example I don't see the v$session table), have I got any way to trace the users accessing the DB? How can I do? I was told about trace but can someone tell me more? I'd like to know the user accessing the DB and the operation that he's launching. Is it possible?
Thanks!

Anything is possible if you have the correct privileges. But then you probably don't have those privileges, and probably for a reason, as you probably also don't have the DBA role for a reason.
If you are to enable trace in a different session, you would need execute access on an Oracle provided package, which differs by version, and of course you assume Oracle never changes, and there is only one version out there: yours.
For a DBA it would be the easiest to grant you the select_catalog_role and the execute_catalog_role.
But then again one would ask why you think you should spy on him, and why you don't cooperate with him and/or try to convince him.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

Way to allow the user access to the saved lists of this Z report

We have a Z report that we want to run at midnight each Sunday and then view the output/layout first thing Monday morning. We can schedule the report to run but it appears that the only way we can save the output as a 'file' for later viewing is by using the "Save with ID" option, which puts the output into a SAP 'saved list'.
The problem with this is that it doesn't appear to be possible to access that list from the Z-report - it would appear that you have to go into SQ01 and use the 'saved list' button. This means giving the Z- report user access to SQ01 as well as Z-report, which, for security (SOD) reasons we don't want to do.
We can run the report in foreground with the output option "File store" and save the output as a file to a specified location,. But this option doesn't appear to be available when the report is scheduled as a background job. If this is done, the background job runs but there's no output anywhere, as far as we can tell.
So what want is to run the report in background but with the output option 'File store' or equivalent (i.e. an output stored somewhere that the report user can view). Is this not possible, or have we missed something in setting up the report run?
Or is there a way to allow the user access to the saved lists of this Z report without giving them T-code SQ01?
Thanks

Hi !
I just wonder if the answer from Varishtb below did solve your propblem.
I have exactly the same problem as you. I also want to be able to look at the saved list without using the sq01.
If you solved it I will be grateful to get the solution.
regards Lars
answer:
You can call the infoset query directly from a transaction code. There's
no need to copy it as a 'Z-report' (or as a custom report). In fact,
everytime you're copying an infoset query to a report, you're calling
for problems the next time you face an upgrade. (That is because SAP
changes the internal logic used to handle the infosets queries from
version to version)
We're using some infoset queries and they work fine this way.

Can two users access the same bootcamp (win os) instance?

We are two users who are using our imac and we both have own user names in mac os. I created a bootcamp partition with windows xp on it. Can both users access the same partition and create their own user spaces within xp?
Will that work also if we use Parallel or virtual box? (access the same user data as in boot camp?)
I would like to have the option for each user to access their windows data either through bootcamp or through the virtual tool.
Message was edited by: gss2
Message was edited by: gss2

gss2 wrote:
What do you mean Virtual box it will not run on its own partition? I have a virtual box running on my desktop and it runs just fine ...own partition?? I don't understand.
Running on its own partition means that the installed OS has its own formatted portion (partition) of the hard drive. A virtual machine does not have its own partition. It creates a virtual partition (a file on the computer) that simulates a file system (partition). So Virtual Box, or any other virtualization software, does not run Windows, or any other OS in its own partition.

What happens when multiple users access the same servlet?

Do the users share all the same resources? Or is a new process generated for each user? I have a servlet that builds a string to return to the user and I only have myself to test, so I can't really see what happens when many users access the servlet. Is there a possibility that the string will get screwed up, like when dealing with multiple threads, or do all the users get their own resources and I don't have to worry about that?

huh? if you can point a test servlet at it, you can point a browser at it (even if the servlet does not serve html it will run)
try pasting the servlet URL into a web browser
refreshing multiple browsers repeatedly could provide a manual test

Multiple users accessing same events

Good Afternoon, i wondered if anyone could assist me. I have described what is going on and have a few questins which i have added in bold.
We are a school in the UK running three Apple suites with a mixture of iMacs and macbooks.
The scenario: We have local users accessing some video footage to create a trailer and i would like to find the best method for this.
The Problem: We opted to use local users rather than network users as i believe imported video events are stored locally. Is this correct?
Based on the previous problem i have created two users, User1 & User2. If User1 imports the event then User2 cant see this and would like to work on the same event, then they have to import the event again. Is there anyway that User1 & User 2 could access the same event without doubling it up?
The problem does change slightly that if i use a networked user, and run iMovie then they can see the events on the local hdd. This only happens on certain machines. Any ideas why this would happen?
If anyone can help in anyway it would be much appreciated.
Thanks

The Problem: We opted to use local users rather than network users as i believe imported video events are stored locally. Is this correct?
Yes, the are stored locally, I don't know if Network users do anything more than authenticate over the network then use the local hard drive anyway. That depends on whether or not your users are setup with Network Home drives or are Mobile users that use the local hard drive instead. You might be able to find out from your SysAdmins whether or not Home folders are on a central server of some kind.
Network users authenticate and have a network home drives.
Is there anyway that User1 & User 2 could access the same event without doubling it up?
It seems like there would be a benefit to using an external Mac HD in this case as the permissions on that folder could easily be ignored. Then any user on that Mac will be able to see the iMovie Projects and Events saved onto that external HD and use them without doubling up the Events folder material. Unfortunately I don't think you can force iMovie to use a different folder for the Movies folder on an internal Hard drive. So an external HD might provide an easy workaround if that's possible. And better yet, it makes it all portable BETWEEN Macs if you need to setup on a different machine for some reason.
Thanks, thats was what i wanted to know. Although I dont think the department will be too keep on buying a minimum of 30 external hdd.
This only happens on certain machines. Any ideas why this would happen?
I don't want to blame this on how the machines are configured, but it may be the network users are seeing a Network Home folder in some cases when they are logged in, and in other cases they are seeing the local home folder on the internal Mac HD. I'm just guessing at this point. But it should be consistent across all the machines depending on if the network users is a Network Home user or a Mobile user.
I have double checked and all users are seeing their network home and no local version.
I just wondered if myabe an older version of iMovie(09) allowed the users to see all events even as local users or network. - bizarre really

Cross Domain User Access for Sharepoint 2013 site collection

Hi All,
We have three Domains , one is for client machines and AD user access purpose and second one is production environment (only some of developers has access to this domain) and third one is SharePoint environment (Because External users needs to
access my SharePoint sites) .
now we need to access SharePoint site collections from my another two domain user accounts with out creating user account from SharePoint domain , how to enable this access?
please advise.
Thanks in Advance,
Mani L

Hi Mani,
You're asking this question in the wrong forum, this forum is meant for suggestions and feedback on the forums themselves, not product support.
I recommend reposting your question in the SharePoint forums here (or you can request that a moderator move this thread for you):
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-us/home?category=sharepoint&filter=alltypes&sort=lastpostdesc
Good luck.
Don't retire TechNet! -
(Don't give up yet - 12,950+ strong and growing)

Problem with users accessing sharepoint 2013 site collection

I have an unbeliveable problem..
I have a sp site with several site collections..
I have around 15 users.. Everybody have access to the root site. Two users do not have access to site collections even though they are in EXACTLY same permission groups like other users who can access those site collections!
I tried to delete them from all user groups in SP, then delete their user profiles in Central Administration, and delete them from Active Directory. After that I recreated their profiles in Active directory, readded them to Central Administration, and again
added them to coresponding groups in SharePoint site collections. They again CAN NOT ACCESS site collections.
What should I do.. This is incredible that 5 users with the same user privileges can access site collections, and 2 can not, even though they are all created in the same way..
Regards,
Srdjan

Hello,
Have you found a solution for this problem? I have the exact same problem with 2 users accessing a site collection (access denied). I found also this row on uls log:
Access Denied. Exception: Attempted to perform an unauthorized operation., StackTrace:   at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SPUtility.HandleAccessDenied(Exception ex)     at Microsoft.Office.Project.PWA.PJBaseWebPartPage.OnPreInit(EventArgs
e)     at System.Web.UI.Page.PerformPreInit()     at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)     at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(Boolean
includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)     at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest()     at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)     at System.Web.HttpApplication.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()
at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionSt... 6955b79c-c42c-50fc-84f8-2b68f97002ea

User access at IO level

I have 2 OUs-- OU1 and OU2.
OU1 has 1 inv org-- IO11
OU2 has 2 inv orgs-- IO21 and IO22.
I will define responsibilities at IO level, i.e., 3 responsibilities for an application --R11(for IO11), R21 (for IO21) and R22 (for IO22).
I want to restrict user access at the IO level.So, R21 should access only IO21 and not IO22. Same for R22.
What will be the value of the following profile options in order to achieve this? My BG name is Set up business Group.
MO:Operating unit
MO:security profile
HR:security profile
HR:business group

Hi,
Try with organization access.
Guess the above 4 profiles wil help you to restrict at OU level only.
Hope this helps.
tks
M J

User Access Code

I have a new LaserJet 600 M602 networked to Windows 7 64 bit PC. I have no recollection of setting a user access code on the printer. How can I get past the User Access Code to check print cartridge status, etc.? Or is there a factory default code on new printers? Thanks, Earl-41

I am sorry, but to get your issue more exposure I would suggest posting it in the commercial forums since this is a commercial printer. You can do this at Printers - LaserJet.
Click on New Post.
I hope this helps.
Thank You.
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
Gemini02
I work on behalf of HP

Missing a User access in the log-on picture

Lacks a user access to log on picture after start-up in Yosemite. In user administration there has been created two user entries - an administrator and a normal access. The normal access is not visible from the log on picture, and it is only possible to access through the visible user (Adm.) and then switch the user by switching in the upper right corner!!!
Wish, possible for all users to log on from the boot up image. (Adm - Normal - Guest access)

same issue:
retina MacBookPro mid2012. Clean install of OS X Yosemite 10.10
I'm randomly missing an account at login screen after reboot.
Sometimes I can fix it with booting into my initial account 'Kevin' (userid 501) and then changing to different login 'Christina' (userid 502).
But if I log out from my account, the second account is missing. Same if I do a reboot.. This have me in stitches as I ofcause has the need for privacy from each account.
Both accounts are set up as admins, guest is deactivated.
rMBP 16gb sep2012.
userid 501:
home directory: /Users/Kevin
userid 502:
home directory: /Users/Christina
apart from that... I have loads of problems with Bluetooth, and hand-off only working 1 way (5s with 8.1) where only iOS -> OS X works, not vice-versa.

User access Autherization

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for