User connection cancelled (0x115)

I keep getting a user connection cancelled (0x115) message about every five minutes. I think it is because I turned off my wireless sync feature with Verizon. How do I turn off this error message
Post relates to: Centro (Verizon)

Hello and welcome to the Palm forums.
Is there a box to check off "dont show again?"
Post relates to: None

Similar Messages

SYS user connects at database level, is it correct?

My senior colleague has given me following information about the sys user. I want to know, is it correct?
Since SYS user connects at the database level, therefore, on killing the active session of the SYS user,only the current statement is cancelled. The database session does not disconnect. Instead it continues to run the remaining statements in the script file in case we are running a script file containing a lot of SQL statements.
Moazzam

Moazzam wrote:
My senior colleague has given me following information about the sys user. I want to know, is it correct?
Since SYS user connects at the database level, therefore, on killing the active session of the SYS user,only the current statement is cancelled. The database session does not disconnect. Instead it continues to run the remaining statements in the script file in case we are running a script file containing a lot of SQL statements.Running a SQL script very likely means SQL*Plus is used. One of two types of Oracle sessions will be created via sqlplus. A dedicated session. Or a shared server session.
A dedicated session can also be local (sqlplus connects "directly" to the dedicated server process), or remote (sqlplus connects via tcp/ip to the dedicated server process).
A server session is usually "killed" using the alter system kill session command. Despite the differences between shared and dedicated server connections, the end result is the same. The session terminates abnormally (session UGA will be released, session will be cleaned up, rolled back, etc) - and the session ceases to exist.
So irrespective of how that sqlplus session runs that script - the session, when killed, will cause a sqlplus failure. And no subsequent script commands would be executed by that Oracle session.
What can happen is that sqlplus continues running, continues reading the script, and continues submitting commands to be executed. However, with the server session killed, there is no server process to service the commands submitted by the sqlplus client. In this case, sqlplus will throw the error "+SP2-0640: Not connected+" after each of the commands it tries to execute after the server session was killed.
The only time when sqlplus will be able to continue is when the session is not killed, but interrupted. The Oracle Call Interface (OCI) supports a OCIBreak() call - allowing the client to interrupt-and-abort the request that its server session is currently executing.
For example, sqlplus sends a OCIBreak() while it waits for a server response (e.g. waiting for the answer to a SQL select query), when the user presses Ctrl-Break to abort that request.
In this case, the session still exists - and the client can issue a new request that the session will service. But an OCIBreak() cannot be triggered (to my knowledge) externally from another Oracle session. You need to send the client process a "break request" (like a Ctrl-Break keystroke) in order to trigger that client process to make an OCIBreak() call to Oracle and interrupt its server process.

Possible to create a Message Box in response to end-user selecting "cancel" or "block" after clicking a link to a URL?

Hi all:
When an end-user clicks a link/button to connect to a URL, the security dialog automatically appears giving them the options of "Allow," "Block" or "Cancel". Should they select "Block" or "Cancel," can we trigger a message box informing them they blocked or cancelled the connection?
With traditional message boxes, we're causing them, ie
var rtnFromBox = xfa.host.messageBox("Information is missing.\n\n Are you sure you want to continue?", "Missing Information",1,2);
if (rtnFromBox == 4){
xfa.host.messageBox("Okay, we'll keep going.","",1,0);
But with the URL security dialog, we're not calling it from a variable - it just happens.
I guess a similar question could be applied to a "Save" button. Where if the end-user selects "cancel" on the "Save As" dialog, a warning could pop-up reminding them to save soon.
Thoughts? Thanks!
Brian

Radz,
I didn't think so but figured I'd ask. Thanks for the response though!
Best,
Brian

ORA-01013: User requested cancel of current operation (#1013)

Hi Guys,
I have an application and in particular an append query that inserts rows into a linked table. I keep on getting this error, (although the code works fine in enterprise manager, and code-imports ok).
I did not cancel the query but it seems to think it has. The insert/append query starts and prompts me for the username and password, this works fine, it just stops half way or beggining etc...
This is the error:
ORA-01013: User requested cancel of current operation (#1013)
And this is the error on Help file:
ODBC – call failed. (Error 3146)
Using an ODBC connection, you tried to perform an operation on data in an ODBC data source. This error may occur when the ODBC data source is on a network drive and you are not connected to the network. Make sure the network is available, and then try the operation again.
Cheers
Champinco

Does "linked table" imply that you're using Access as a front-end for Oracle? I know that Access sets a query timeout value when it works with ODBC connections and this error generally occurs when you have a query that exceeds that timeout. I don't know whether Access lets you adjust that timeout, but assuming you're using the Oracle ODBC driver, you should be able to disable query timeout in the DSN configuration.
Justin

Connection canceling

HI, sorry for my English.
Here is my problem,
I make application wich using HttpConnection, and I want to release cancel option for user (if loading data takes long time), but there are situations where application blocks after user click cancel command. in commandAction I close active connection, and change current display. If anyone has experiance with this help me.
Best regards, Thank you.

When you have an existing wireless network for your Internet connection, life will be much easier if you configure the Airport Express to "Join" your existing wireless network.
Then you will be able to stream AirTunes and browse the Internet without having to switch networks.
"Hard Reset" the AirPort Express by holding in the reset button until the amber light begins to blink more quickly and keep holding the reset button in for another 4-5 seconds when this occurs, then release the reset button.
Allow 40-45 seconds for the AirPort Express to restart...the amber light will be blinking slowly at this time.
Open AirPort Utility and click Continue to follow the guided setup to configure your AirPort Express to "Join" the wireless network that the Netgear router is providing.
The tricky part about this will be that you will need to know the exact type of wireless security that your Netgear router is using so that you can enter the correct setting on the AirPort Express to allow it to "join" the network correctly. If the security setting is not correct, the AirPOrt Express will not be able to join the Netgear wireless network and you will need to start over again with the "Hard Reset" to try the configuration again.
If you are not sure what type of security your Netgear router is using, you should contact your ISP or consult the documentation that came with the device for more information.
BTW, the advice that you received from the person at the ISP about one network "overpowering" the other was total nonsense. Hope you get a more knowledgeable person on the next try.
Post back if you need more help with the "Join" configuration for the AirPort Express. The key will be knowing exactly what type of security that the Netgear router is using.

User Cannot Cancel Meeting Arranged by delegate from their own Calendar

Environment is Outlook 2010 running on windows 7. We are up to date with service packs/updates. Back end is exchange 2010 SP1 with Rollup 8. Users connect in cached exchange mode.
User A has a delegate (User B) setup on her mailbox who has editor permissions on Calendar, Tasks and Inbox, User B is also set to receive copies of meeting related requests.
User B will open User A's calendar and create a new meeting inviting attendees and adding a meeting room.
User A will later decide to cancel the meeting so opens the meeting and clicks the cancel meeting button. A dialogue box opens saying she doesn't have permission. The meeting stays in her calendar.
I have tried to replicate the issue by setting up the same permissions between two separate mailboxes and everything works fine.
Anyone have any Ideas why this user can not cancel meeting in her own calendar?

Hi,
Please try the following steps to narrow down the issue:
1. Check whether UserA can cancel the meeting request which is created by himself in his own Calendar.
2. Disable Exchange Cached mode and use Outlook Online to cancel the meeting request which was created by UserB.
If the issue doesn't happen in Outlook Online mode, please create a new Outlook profile to have a try:
http://support2.microsoft.com/kb/829918/en-us
Regards,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Cannot send email via ActiveSync when user connect from Internet (Exchange 2010 SP3 RU5)

Hi All.
This is the first time I encounter this kind of issue, whenever user connect from the internet they cannot send email from their Phone or Windows Mail App, but they can retrieve email
But when they connect from Internal Network they can send email. I already test ActiveSync from internet using www.testexchangeconnectivity.com and it pass all tests.
I also check the Firewall and all the necessary ports already opened (we even open all ports) , the default TTL on the firewall 3600 second.
From what I read ActiveSync use some kind of HTTP POST or in MS terminology "PING" command, but still have no idea what kind of configuration that should be made to the Firewall so it can pass this "PING" command. Because from what I
see in Android Logcat the problem always related to this PING command
10-07 08:12:38.714 I/Exchange(31971): Interrupt with reason 1
10-07 08:12:38.714 I/Exchange(31971): Ping task ending with status: -1
10-07 08:12:38.904 D/Exchange(31971): created outputstream
10-07 08:12:39.204 W/Exchange(31971): IOException sending mail
10-07 08:12:39.204 E/Exchange(31971): Generic error for operation SendMail: status 200, result -100
10-07 08:12:39.204 W/Exchange(31971): Aborting outbox sync for error -99
10-07 08:12:39.274 I/Exchange(31971): Ping task starting for 3
10-07 08:12:39.304 D/SyncManager(644): failed sync operation [email protected] u0 (com.android.exchange), com.android.email.provider, USER, latestRunTime 71219435, EXPEDITED, reason: 10040, SyncResult: stats [ numIoExceptions: 1]
10-07 08:12:39.304 D/SyncManager(644): not retrying sync operation because SYNC_EXTRAS_DO_NOT_RETRY was specified [email protected] u0 (com.android.exchange), com.android.email.provider, USER, latestRunTime 71220078, EXPEDITED, reason: 10040

Hi ronaldosy,
How about the work flow of Outlook or OWA on PC internally/externally?
If only phone has this issue, I suggest ask ActiveSync Forum for help so that you can get more professional suggestions. For your convenience:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/home?forum=exchangesvrmobility
Best Regards,
Allen Wang

How to find the number of users connected to database from OS level(Linux)

Hi All,
Could anyone know , how to find the number of users connected to database without connecting with sql*plus
is there any command to find it?
example we have 10 databases in one server, how to find the number of users connected to particular database without connecting to database(v$session)?
oracle version:- 10g,11g
Operating System:- OEL4/OEL5/AIX/Solaris
any help will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Thank you.
Regards,
Rajesh.

Excellent.
Tested, works as long as you set the ORACLE_SID first ( to change databases )
ps -ef | grep $ORACLE_SID | grep "LOCAL=NO" | awk '{print $2}' | wc -l
Thanks!
select OSUSER
from V$SESSION
where AUDSID = SYS_CONTEXT('userenv','sessionid')
and rownum=1;Best Regards
mseberg

Error: USer request cancel of current operatin

Hi,
My database is in 10.2.0 and OS is Windows 2003. We are having some inhouse MIS reports. One report was running earlier without any error. But past few days I am getting the following error:
Can any one help me.
Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error '80040e31'
[Oracle][ODBC][Ora]ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
/mis/procedures.asp, line 291
thankyou
satyanag

ORA-01013 user requested cancel of current operation
Cause: The user interrupted an Oracle operation by entering CTRL-C, Control-C, or another canceling operation. This forces the current operation to end. This is an informational message only.
Action: Continue with the next operation.
So it means that you need to check back with the application. If its coming from the MIS than check back what's happening in the file that is given in the error.
Aman....

How to make Adobe acrobat feature to convert SAP Pages to PDF available for multiple users connected to the same server

We have installed Adobe Acrobat X Pro- English,Francais,Deutsch version 10.1.9 in our test environment and tried testing it for converting SAP pages into PDF with a few pilot users. In doing so we faced a challenge, where only one user at a time can use Adobe Acrobat PRO to convert SAP pages in to PDF.As long as the first user who is connected to Adobe Acrobat Pro via SAP isn’t logged off, other users connected to the same server are not being able to get the “Save As” dialog box to save the PDF in their preferred location.
This is a business requirement and we need an urgent solution for the same. Can anyone help us in telling us if this is possible and if yes the how to go about?

It's not something we deal with here, the LiveCycle products are a different world. Key points: Adobe LiveCycle is a range of products, some desktop, some server. LiveCycle PDF Generator is the one you should look at, it comes in 3 editions. License terms are by negotiation. Key management is via its Java API.

How to provide access to multiple users connected to a Dumb switch? (multi-auth/multi-domain)

Good morning everybody,
I am writing on behalf of not being able to implement a desired outcome in our company network. In fact the situation is as follows:
What I want to do is to be able to authenticate users (802.1x authentication) in our company radius server and authorize them access by having a dynamic VLAN assignment in a multi-user environment on one and the same port of a Cisco 2960 switch. So far, the authentication and authorization has been working completely smoothly (there are no problems with itself). The concept involves the configuration of both DATA and VOICE VLANs as I there is also phone authentication implemented. In order to simulate this environment I introduce a Dumb switch connected to my Cisco 2960 Catalyst.
What I have successfully managed to get to work so far is this:
1) On one switch port I have tried the “authentication host-mode multi-domain” and it worked perfectly for a PC behind a telephone, or with one PC connected to a the dumb switch + the telephone connected to another port of the dumb switch. Logically it is the same situation as there is a separation in two domains – DATA and VOICE. Bellow is an output from show authentication sessions for this scenario.
Interface MAC Address Method Domain Status Session ID
Fa0/23 0021.9b62.b79b dot1x DATA Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F3008E (user1)
Fa0/23 0015.655c.b912 dot1x VOICE Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F9009F (phone)
2) On the other hand, when I try the same scenario with the “authentication host-mode multi-auth”, the switch still separates the traffic in two domains and is able to authenticate all users, AS LONG AS they are in the same VLAN.
show authentication sessions:
Interface MAC Address Method Domain Status Session ID
Fa0/23 0021.9b62.b79b dot1x DATA Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F3008E (user1)
Fa0/23 b888.e3eb.ebac dot1x DATA Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F8008C (user2)
Fa0/23 0015.655c.b912 dot1x VOICE Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F9009F (phone)
However, I cannot succeed authentication of many users from DIFFERENT VLANs, neither in multi-auth nor in multi-domain modes.
What I want to get is an output like this:
Interface MAC Address Method Domain Status Session ID
Fa0/23 0021.9b62.b79b dot1x DATA Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F3008E (user1)
Fa0/23 b888.e3eb.ebac dot1x DATA Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F8008C (user2)
Fa0/23 0015.655c.b912 dot1x VOICE Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F9009F (phone)
I want the switch to authenticate the users anytime they connect to itself and for them to have an instant access to the network. (I tell this because I tried scenario 1) with multi-domain mode and authentication violation replace, and it worked but, two users never had access to the “Internet” simultaneously!!!
The configuration of the interface connected to the Dumb switch is as follows.
interface FastEthernet0/x
description Connection to DUMBswitch
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan XXX
switchport port-security maximum 10
switchport port-security
switchport port-security violation protect
authentication host-mode multi-auth
authentication priority dot1x
authentication port-control auto
authentication timer reauthenticate 4000
authentication violation replace
dot1x pae authenticator
dot1x timeout tx-period 10
spanning-tree portfast
The way I see it is explained in the following steps:
- PC1 connects to the Dumb switch. This causes the Cisco switch to authenticate user1. This creates an auth. session with its MAC address linked to a domain DATA.
- When PC2 connects to the Dumb switch, this causes the violation replace which replaces the recent authenticated MAC address with the MAC of PC2. I would like it once authenticated to appear in the authentication sessions with a link to a new DATA domain linked to the VLAN assigned from the RADIUS server.
Is this possible? I think (in theory) this is the only way to provide authenticated access to multiple users connecting through Dumb switch to the network.
Has anybody ever succeeded in such a configuration example and if yes, I would be love to get some help in doing so?
Thank you
Stoimen Hristov

Hi Stoimen,
I have done a setup similar to yours with the only exception being VLAN assignment. When I used dACLs only, it makes things somewhat easier as the VLAN no longer matters. Remember that the switchport is in access mode and will only allow a single VLAN across it (with the exception of the voice VLAN). I think that is the real cause of your problem.
From what I can see, you have 2 options available to you:
1) Use dACLs instead of VLAN assignment. This means that an access list will be downloaded from the radius server straight to the authenticated user's session. I have tested this and it works perfectly. Just Google Cisco IBNS quick reference guide and look for the section that deals with Low Impact mode.
2) Get rid of the dumb switches and use managed switches throughout your network. Dumb switches will always be a point of weakness in your network because they have no intelligence to do advanced security features like port security, 802.1x, DHCP snooping, etc.
Hopefully someone else will chime in with another option.
Xavier

Max no. of users connections in essbase

Hi All,
How can i find what is the max. no. of users connections is allowed for essbase. If there is some setting in EAS console or we can define it through MAXL. We are using very old version (version 6- using ESSCMD commands). We have already provided access to about 475 users. 200 more users are waiting for access.
Thanks,
Anchit

Herewith the relevant parameter you can define in your ESSBASE.CFG - it should answer your question:
MAXLOGINS
Sets a limit on the number of user sessions that can be connected to the Essbase Server at any one time.
Syntax
MAXLOGINS n
n Any integer from 1000 to 1048575 is valid. The default value is 10000.
Description
This setting limits the maximum number of user sessions allowed to connect to the Essbase Server at any one time. This number includes multiple instances of the same user.
You may wish to adjust the value of MAXLOGINS to match computer resources, or to more closely manage concurrent ports and user sessions. A concurrent port is used for each unique combination of client machine, Essbase Server and login name. For example, the same user > with five open Excel worksheets connected to the same Essbase Server use one port, but five sessions.
Notes
Increasing the value of MAXLOGINS increases memory use approximately 6 bytes per user session.
If the setting is less than the minimum value, 1000, the value is assumed to be 1000.
Example
MAXLOGINS 50000
increases the maximum number of simultaneous logins possible, from the default of 10000 to 50000. > Kind regards
André

How to terminate remaining Actions in a script sequence if the user presses "Cancel" during SaveAs

Hello,
I'm using the following script to email a completed form to a pre-programmed email address and would like a way to cancel remaning in-line scripts if the user cancels teh first Step.
Basically, after completing the form I cereated, the user would click the submit button and a series of actions will take place:
1. Execute a menu item: SaveAs giving the user a chance to Save the current state of the form.
[Here is where I need a Arcobat script that terminates all remaning actions if the user cancels the SaveAs action]
2. Once the form has been saved (and not canceled), the next action involves prepping and generating an email to send the form using the user's default email client:
var e = this.getField("ccAdd"); //There is a field on the form that enables the user to enter a CC: address, if applicable
var cCCAddr = e.value;
   var cSubLine = "Subject goes Here"; //preformatted subject
   var cBody = "File attached." // preformatted Body text
   // Build the e-mail URL
   var cEmailURL = "mailto:[email protected]?cc=" + cCCAddr
                 + "&subject=" + cSubLine
                 + "&body=" + cBody;
//Before sending, set ALL form fields to "readonly"
for (var i = 0; i < this.numFields; i++) {
    var fname = this.getNthFieldName(i);
    var f = this.getField(fname);
        f.readonly = true;
// hide submit display button, so that it doesn’t show on “readonly” version
var h = getField("Button1");
h.display = display.hidden;
//Generate the outgoing email using the user’s default email client. Send attachment as a PDF
   this.submitForm({cURL: cEmailURL, cSubmitAs:"PDF", cCharSet:"utf-8"});
3. Once the form has been emailed, another SaveAs menu item fires, thereby, allowing the user to save the "readonly" version. So now, he has a clean "open version" that he saved before Step #2, and a "readonly" version after step #2.
The only thing that's causing an issue now is if the user presses Cancel after the Step #1 (where he/she is asked to save the form), the remaining scripts in-line continue to fire, alougth the "Cancel" button was pressed.
SO, I need a script that terminates all remaining scripts (i.e. end process) if the user hits cancels during Step #1, thereby preventing step 2 from starting.
Any ideas? Thanks in advance.
S

ok, i've had a play with it . . . and come up with two options, one that breaks attempts to break any code being run if the cancel button is hit. either way, they need to be added into a document level javascript, and applies the required action to your submit button (trust me, this becomes a lot easier than applying script to buttons directly!)
i just wrote functions that chain, so the first function calls the second, and the second calls the third. seemed easier than trying to nest them. i know the finaliseForm function simply calls the first in the chain, but that's just a matter of personal preference, i prefer to define functions with logical names. also, that way, you can test each function individually, or all together, and write more code to the finaliseForm function if you need to.
not sure if you're using acrobat 9 or X, but the document level javascript is in two different places. in 9 it's under advanced - document processing - document javascripts. just give it a name, add it, remove any lines in the window that appear and paste in this code.
so here's the one that continues the script, with prompts, even when the no button is hit. let me know how you go!
function saveasEditable() {
    //prompt the user to continue save as
    var saveasPrompt = app.alert({
                cMsg : "Do you want to save an editable version of this file before emailing?",
                cTitle : "Save As Editable Form",
                nIcon : 2,
                nType : 2
    //where 4 is yes and 3 is no
    if (saveasPrompt == 4) {
        app.execMenuItem("SaveAs");
        emailForm();
    } else {
        emailForm();
function emailForm() {
    //and invoke a second alert to prompt emailing the form
    var emailPrompt = app.alert({
                cMsg : "Do you wish to email the form now?",
                cTitle : "Submit form via email",
                nIcon : 2,
                nType : 2
    if (emailPrompt == 4) {
        var e = this.getField("ccAdd"); //There is a field on the form that enables the user to enter a CC: address, if applicable
        var cCCAddr = e.value;
        var cSubLine = "Subject goes Here"; //preformatted subject
        var cBody = "File attached."// preformatted Body text
            // Build the e-mail URL
            var cEmailURL = "mailto:[email protected]?cc=" + cCCAddr
             + "&subject=" + cSubLine
             + "&body=" + cBody;
        //Before sending, set ALL form fields to "readonly"
        for (var i = 0; i < this.numFields; i++) {
            var fname = this.getNthFieldName(i);
            var f = this.getField(fname);
            f.readonly = true;
        // hide submit display button, so that it doesn’t show on “readonly” version
        var h = this.getField("Button1");
        h.display = display.hidden;
        //Generate the outgoing email using the user’s default email client. Send attachment as a PDF
        this.submitForm({
                cURL : cEmailURL,
                cSubmitAs : "PDF",
                cCharSet : "utf-8"
        saveasReadonly();
    } else {
function saveasReadonly() {
    //and invoke a third alert to prompt save of the read only form
    var readonlyPrompt = app.alert({
                cMsg : "Do you wish to also save a read-only copy of this file?",
                cTitle : "Save As Read-only Copy?",
                nIcon : 2,
                nType : 2
    if (readonlyPrompt == 4) {
        app.execMenuItem("SaveAs");
    } else {}
function finaliseForm() {        saveasEditable();
//assign all of this to the submit button from the doc level
this.getField("Button1").setAction("MouseDown", "finaliseForm();");

Office 365 Pro Plus - Fail to update Build version when user clicks 'Cancel'

I'm planning to deliver Office 365 Pro Plus updates via SCCM 2007 where i can control the build versions and use the already available SCCM to do so.
My issue is around the user clicking "Cancel" when they are prompted with the notification window to close down Office apps when trying to release an updated build version.
This is because when the user selects cancel the application fails with "The exit code is 17002, the execution status is FailureNonRetry" =
FAILED. This message is taken from the execmgr.log.
Ideally I'd like to allow the user to defer the install say 3 times and afterwards deploy it mandatory...like how you could manage WSUS patches.
Does anyone have any helpful suggestions around this? Thanks in advance!

Generaly, this is not possible I think, at least nothing can be done on Office side. Office
365 cannot install the new build if any Office applications are running.
We do have a attribute (FORCEAPPSHUTDOWN) that can be set in configuration.xml file to force shutting down any applications that block the action, but this will not
make the process your ideal way.
So through Office if you click Cancel the user cancels the update and will not be re-prompted? Surely in the corporate world you would want them to be compliant and not have the user ultimately manage their patch level?
I am already using Forceappshutdown but enabled the display level (in the config.xml) which is how they are prompted to close the app. For sure doing this silently would not be feasible. It would automatically close office regardless. Definite no no.
I will repost in the SCCM forum and see if i have any luck if what you say is true. I can't be the only person with this issue. I need to find some guidance on deferral procedures.

See users/connections, who ar authenticated and sending huge amount of spam

I have delay in SMTP server. SMTP server has user authentication, so it means - if someone is sendig mail to outside of my domain, he must be authenticated.
I have turned on logging on all channels i have one main tcp_local channel, but the logging shows only information about message - from-to, reason. But does not show information about real source.
1) how can I see, "who" is sending huge amount of mail?
2) How can I drop connection, diallow this user for time or manage this user connections?
At this moment queue says:
qm.maint> summarize
Queued Queued
Channel Messages = Active + Delayed Size (Mb)
ims-ms 0 0 0 0.0
process 0 0 0 0.0
reprocess 0 0 0 0.0
tcp_auth 0 0 0 0.0
tcp_intranet 0 0 0 0.0
tcp_local 1461 1461 0 3.5
tcp_submit 0 0 0 0.0
Totals 1461 1461 0 3.5
and main TOP TO domains are:
Count Destination domain
====== ======================================================================
59 hse.ie
38 teagasc.ie
28 oireachtas.ie
22 entemp.ie
18 home.com
17 wexfordcoco.ie
14 ireland.com

>
As always, please provide the exact version of Messaging Server you are running (./imsimta version).
I have delay in SMTP server.What do you mean by this statement? What "delay"?
SMTP server has user authentication, so it means - if someone is sendig mail to outside of my domain, he must be authenticated.
I have turned on logging on all channels i have one main tcp_local channel, but the logging shows only information about message - from-to, reason. But does not show information about real source.There is a whole guide about how to get additional logging information here:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-4428/bgbex?a=view
e.g. enable LOG_USERNAME to see the user that authenticated, and LOG_CONNECTION to see additional IP connection information.
1) how can I see, "who" is sending huge amount of mail?
2) How can I drop connection, diallow this user for time or manage this user connections? You could change the users password to stop them authenticating, or set their mailuserstatus: attribute to disabled and so forth.
Regards,
Shane.

User connection cancelled (0x115)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for