User Exit issue after upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0

Hi Experts,
After upgrade we are facing some issues regarding user exit. In 4.6c we have implemented several user exit to do customization in several module like SD,FI and HR. But after upgrade it has been identified that SAP has already provided this functionality in ECC 6.0. Now our problem is when this transactions are called or executed control is going to both custom and standard code. Which took long time to execute and causing performance issue.
Is there any ways to identify which are the functionality SAP has provided in ECC 6.0 so that we can delete our custom user exits.

Hi
List all the user exits which you have modified and check in OSS notes you will get the OSS note with all the details what functionality has been changed. Based on this you can delete or retain the user exits which ever you want.
Regards,
JB

Similar Messages

Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query

Hi All,
There is a Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query in a report painter.
This query is working fine when executed in 4.7 system where as it is running for more time in ECC6.0.
Select query is on the table COSP.
SELECT (FIELD_LIST)
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE I_COSP PACKAGE SIZE 1000
        FROM COSP CLIENT SPECIFIED
        WHERE GJAHR IN SELR_GJAHR
          AND KSTAR IN SELR_KSTAR
          AND LEDNR EQ '00'
          AND OBJNR IN SELR_OBJNR
          AND PERBL IN SELR_PERBL
          AND VERSN IN SELR_VERSN
          AND WRTTP IN SELR_WRTTP
          AND MANDT IN MANDTTAB
        GROUP BY (GROUP_LIST).
   LOOP AT I_COSP      .
     COSP                           = I_COSP      .
     PERFORM PCOSP       USING I_COSP-_COUNTER.
     CLEAR: $RWTAB, COSP                          .
     CLEAR CCR1S                         .
   ENDLOOP.
ENDSELECT.
I have checked with the table indexes, they were same as in 4.7 system.
What can be the reson for the difference in execution time. How can this be reduced without adjusting the select query.
Thanks in advance for the responses.
Regards,
Dedeepya.

Hi,
ohhhhh....... lots of problems in select query......this is not the way you should write it.
Some generic comments:
1. never use SELECT
                   endselect.
   SELECT
into table
   for all entries in table
where.
   use perform statment after this selection.
2. Do not use into corresponding fields. use exact structure type.
3. use proper sequence of fields in the where condition so that it helps table go according to indexes.
    e.g in your case
          sequence should be
LEDNR
OBJNR
GJAHR
WRTTP
VERSN
KSTAR
HRKFT
VRGNG
VBUND
PARGB
BEKNZ
TWAER
PERBL
sequence should be same as defined in table.
Always keep select query as simple as possible and perform all other calculations etc. afterwords.
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Pranaya

Stability issues after upgrade from 5 to 6.1?

Dear all,
my client plans to upgrade from WLS 5 to 6.1 soon. The application is
an intranet portal with Epicentric and Vignette used as additional
products.
However, some voices say that 6.1 has stability issues. Well, these
statements are rumours and lack any proof or even anecdotal evidence I
have heard of, and therefore it is very difficult to respond
appropriately.
Having said this, my questions are:
- Did any of you have stability issues after upgrading from 5 to 6.1
on Solaris?
- If yes, what were they and how did you solve them (e.g. upgrade to
SP 5)?
- In 1-2 sentences, what is the context of the application?
My goal is to present a evidence that the romoured stability issues
don't exist or/and a list of meastures to avoid/solve them, if any.
Many thanks in advance
Andreas

"Andreas Raab" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
my client plans to upgrade from WLS 5 to 6.1 soon. The application is
an intranet portal with Epicentric and Vignette used as additional
products.
However, some voices say that 6.1 has stability issues. Well, these
statements are rumours and lack any proof or even anecdotal evidence I
have heard of, and therefore it is very difficult to respond
appropriately.
Having said this, my questions are:
- Did any of you have stability issues after upgrading from 5 to 6.1
on Solaris?
- If yes, what were they and how did you solve them (e.g. upgrade to
SP 5)?
- In 1-2 sentences, what is the context of the application?
My goal is to present a evidence that the romoured stability issues
don't exist or/and a list of meastures to avoid/solve them, if any.Hi Andreas,
Normally proving that rumors are true is a responcibility of
rumors suppliers. Reverse does sound to me like a joke.
Regards,
Slava Imeshev
P.S. Current weblogic 6.1 is a stable product.

After upgrading from 4.6C to ECC 6.0 templates not working in smartform

Hello,
After upgrading from 4.6C to ECC 6.0 templates not working properly in smartform, although value is flowing to the point the template is getting called and inside the template there are text elements where placeholders are kept to display the value, when the print is taken there are no values being displayed by the text elements.
Please note - Text elements doesnot have any conditions present in the condition tabstrip.
Thanks,
Abhishek

Hi,
After the upgrade, you will have to do the security upgrade.
Please follow these steps.
1. Go To SU25
2. Run step 2A to 2D.
3. In step 2C, you shall get the list of all the affected roles.
Click on first role. It will take you to authorizations of that role. Click on the "New" tab there to find the new objects added to the role after the upgrade.
Note: You can open the same role in the unupgraded system to check.
4. Provide the access to the required authorization objects.
5. Disable the unwanted authorization objects.
6. Generate the profile.
7. Follow the same steps for all the affected roles listed.
Please note that you will have a list of new objects added.You need to maintain them inorder to avoid any access issues.
8. After step 2C, complete 2D.
Regards,
Imran

Impact on Custom / Std IDOC after upgrading from 4.7 to ECC 6.0

I am in Upgrade project (4.7 to ECC 6.0).
What will be the impact of the existing Custom and Std IDOC after upgrading from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 and if any impact, what are precautionary steps to be taken to work as it is.
Will there be any Impact on ALE also ?
Thanks & Regards
Khaleel

closed.

Issues after Upgrade from Oracle 10.1.0.5 to 10.2.0.5 in Windows Server2003

Good Morning Good People,
I have run in to some issues after upgrading my 10.1.0.5 database to 10.2.0.5. Initially after the firtst upgrade from 10.1.0.5 to 10.2.0.0 one has to run Critical Patch set 4 to get to 10.2.0.5. Well after initial up grade everything worked fine. I could connect to the database from within the server as well as remotely through SQL*PLUS client. However, after completeing the patch I'm still able to connect to the database from within the server, but remotely i get the following error:
ORA-12514 : TNS Listener does not currently know of service requested in connect descriptor.
I also get Error ORA-12505: TNS:listener does not currently know of SID given in connect descriptor The Connection descriptor used by the client was: (description=(address=(host=mcquery2)(protocol=tcp)(port=1521))(connect_data=(sid=mcquery)(server=dedicated)))
I've tried serval different things to trouble shoot the issue but nothing seems to work.
If anyone has run into s similar issue please help. This is ruining my weekend! LOL!
Edited by: user10835577 on Aug 29, 2010 9:15 AM

From the client or the server?
SERVER:
tnsnames.ora:
MCQUERY=
(DESCRIPTION=
(ADDRESS=
(PROTOCOL=TCP)
(HOST=10.36.27.184)
(PORT=1521)
(CONNECT_DATA=
(SERVICE_NAME=MCQUERY)
listener.ora
SID_LIST_LISTENER =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = PLSExtProc)
(ORACLE_HOME = D:\oracle\product\10.1.0\Db_1)
(PROGRAM = extproc)
LISTENER =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = 10.36.27.184)(PORT = 1521))
FROM REMOTE SQLPLUS Client:
tnsnames.ora
MCQUERY=
(DESCRIPTION=
(ADDRESS=
(PROTOCOL=TCP)
(HOST=10.36.27.184)
(PORT=1521)
(CONNECT_DATA=
(SERVICE_NAME=MCQUERY)
listener.ora
SID_LIST_LISTENER =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = PLSExtProc)
(ORACLE_HOME = D:\oracle\product\10.1.0\Client_3)
(PROGRAM = extproc)
LISTENER =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = cotsdot370.cotsdot.dom)(PORT = 1521))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = 10.36.27.184)(PORT = 1521))
Thanks,
Malcolm
Edited by: user10835577 on Aug 29, 2010 12:01 PM

Sorting issue after upgrade from 9i to 10g

Dear all,
It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
Thanks for your help,
M.T.

903714 wrote:
Dear all,
It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
Thanks for your help,
M.T. This is expected behavior in 10g. Oracle will not order the dataset for you unless and until you explicitly specify it.
So without using order by clause in 10g, oracle doesn't guarantee that rows will be ordered.
To go back to old behavior like 9i, you can set a workaround by
alter session set "_newsort_enabled"=false;
Also see MOS - Order Of Data Retrieval Differs after upgrading 9i To 10g [ID 456707.1]

Schema error after upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 5.0

Hi all,
We have recently upgraded from 4.6C to ECC 5.0. We are having problem in payroll run. When I did a syntax check in schema, I got "UDPM" rule doesn't exist. I checked, this rule is present in 4.6C. This is the standard rule. If I am right, it should have come with upgrade right?
or SAP has changed this? From where Can I get the info about this?
Also similar error I got in Function 'USTAX' parameter 3 is not allowed. If I remove that parameter, I don't know what is the implication of that.
I checked for SAP notes. I did not find anything.
Please let me know if any of you have come with such situation.
Thanks in advance.
Sarika.

Hi Sarika,
We are also in a similar transition i.e. 4.6C to mysap Ecc5.0 . But we are on Canadian Payroll.
I had search OSS and got a PDF document regarding " Upgrading to SAP R/3 Enterprize - A User Guide to Canadian mysap HR Customers" . U may be can find a similar one for US payroll. I can give u mine, but it wont be of any use as it is for Canadian Payroll.
In Canadian mysap Upgrade , the function P0224 has been replaced by function KXDTM . Although P0024 is still in used in Schema K00T for conversion purposes.
Regards,
Jay Gandhi

Transactions missing in Role After Upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0

Hello Friends,
I did multiple searches on this question but it was unsuccessful. We are upgrading from 4.6c to ECC 6.0. We are testing roles to make sure the migrate properly.
Irrespective of su25. There are transactions that are not obsolete and are missing in ECC 6.0
For example if I have a role called FIROLE. Which has 20 tcodes in 4.6c. When we upgrade to ECC 6.0 8 tcodes will be missing. This is not because the tcodes become obsolete.
What is the best way to approach this. Should we be testing each role?
Thanks!

Hello Imran,
transactions can be 'obsolete' also if they still exist.....
If the application developers create new functionality, new look,.... in new transactions but still let the 'old' ones in the system.
Just think about the ME2*-transactions..... The developer can decide, that such new transactions should replace the old ones after upgrade in the roles or let the old ones as they are.
You can get an overview about replaced/obsolete transactions by reviewing table PRGN_CORR2 (make sure, that you have the latest version, according to [SAP Note 991377|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/991377] !!!). SU25 gets its information from that table.
b.rgds, Bernhard

Layouts disappear after upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0

HI friends ,
In the upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0 , the layouts in the SAP QUERIES in the new system are either lost or showing lesser fields than original system .How do get the exact layouts as in 4.6c?
Please help...
Many thnx ,
Hemanth .

Try using SQVI transaction .
Please reward if useful.

Stability issues after upgrading from OS 10.2.6 to OS 10.2.8

Hey to all the Mac experts,
I'm new to the Macs. I recently purchased a 2nd hand Power Mac G3 Beige Desktop for really cheap to learn and get a better understanding of Macs. It currently has 256 mb ram, G3 300 mhz cpu, 10 gig WD HD, 4.7 gig Mac DVD drive, 10 mb NIC, floppy, original mouse and keyboard, an USB add-on card, and video port adapter to use with SVGA monitors. It came with Mac OS 10.2 Jaguar loaded on and cd's. From the info, this older unit can't support or run 10.3 or 10.4. So, I'm fine with 10.2.
My main concern is issues when I use the Software update feature and upgraded from 10.2.6 to 10.2.8. This MAC should run 10.2.8 according to the specs. After the update and restart, I sometimes get a blank screen, or can't move the mouse, lockups and random keyboard issues. I ended up reinstalling from scratch with just cds. I didn't load any 3rd party software. I reran the software update feature again. Same thing as before. After erasing and reloading a 2nd time. I only did the updates for everything but up to 10.2.8. I searched the apple site and downloaded the updates from 10.2.0 to 10.2.6. So, no problem with that. The only 3rd party software currently installed is Firefox 1.5 and adobe reader 6.01 plus all software updates for Quicktime, Safari, etc.
Now my question is, what is the reason why it can't properly run version 10.2.8? Is there a workaround or solution to this problem? I know I could get by with 10.2.6, but what's the point when it should load and run 10.2.8 according to the specs here?
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=43124
Thanks in advance for any info.
PS> I read about sometimes Macs need a firmware update to properly run Mac OS 10. So, this is the only firmware I found for this MAC and it turns out I don't need it.
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25176
Mac G3 Beige Desktop Mac OS X (10.2.x) 256 mb ram, 10 gig hd, 300 mhz

Hi macsoprano,
Hello
First of all, welcome to the Apple discussions.
I don't think that this is a Firmware issue.
Download the combo updater via this link: Combo Updater
Don't forget repair permissions before and after the update
Disk Repair Permissions
* Good luck ...
Dimaxum

Printing issue after upgrade from 11.5.10.2 to 12.1.3

Hi
I am trying to print the seed reports after upgrade. Text format reports are printing well, the problem is with the XML and RTF format reports, not yet tested the PDF format.
Thanks
Reddy

Hi Hussein,
Application release : 12.1.3
Database Version : 11.2.0.2
OS Version : RHEL 5.5
The problem with the seeded reports only, not yet started testing the custom reports, for the XML/RTF its printing, but the output has lot of junk. If I view the output in the Concurrent request, it looks nice. When I view the file from $APPLCSF/$APPLOUT it has lots of junk, the same way it is printing.
Thanks
Reddy

POE Issues After Upgrade from 7.0.240 to 7.6.100

We have a 5508 that has just been upgraded from 7.0.240 to 7.6.100 with many 1142's, 3502's, etc. Our wired network is HP 5406zl's POE on every port and plenty of power available for POE.
As soon as we upgraded our 1142's to 7.6.100 we started getting poe faults on several switchports. The trap indicates an over-current error and the AP will not power up. I can move that same AP to another switch port and some times that will work. If I reboot the switch the faults may clear on those ports, but will reappear on other ports. It is not always the same APs, and not always the same switch ports.
I have tried downgrading back to 7.0 and the errors clear. Obviously I want to be running the newer code for the bug fixes and features. TAC has not given this case any time yet.
The switches report more than enough power being available still on the ports. I can see the ports try to come up, and most of the times the AP will start to power up and come up at 8 watts as it boots, and as soon as the AP is ready to go and starts powering the radios it enters the fault state.
The APs all run in local mode, and I have tried enabling "Pre-standard 802.3af switches. "
Does anyone have any ideas? Something must have changed in the way power is drawn or negotiated.

HI Glenn,
Go for 7.4.121.0 (7.4MR2) version & see if this issue is there ? If not then it may be a bug/issue specific to this latest code. Here is the release notes for this code
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn74mr02.html
Also makesure your WLC FUS also upgraded to 1.7.0.0. See below & keep note this will take 30-40min downtime to your wireless.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/fus_rn_1_7_0_0.html
The version I have given is the one most people including TAC would recommend
HTH
Rasika
**** Pls rate all useful responses ****

Major issues after upgrading from XP to Vista on Qosmio F20

I have recently upgraded from XP to Vista on my Qosmio F20 and have issues. It appears I have lost the ability to change screen resolutions, adjust the volume , brightness etc. Basically I have lost the functions of the laptop. I have also tried updating the BIOS but get the following error message "BiOS updated is not supported OS - Unsupported OS or service pack installed.
This is also making the machine very slow.

Do you have some questions now, or you wrote just a report about your Vista experience on Qosmio F20?
The fact is that Toshiba does not support Vista on this notebook model and because of that you will never have full operating Vista (including Toshiba tools and utilities). For supported notebooks Toshiba has offered special Vista supporting BIOS but for your notebook such BIOS update does not exist.
Sorry! :(

Bluetooth issue after upgrading from windows 8.1 to windows 10

i upgraded from windows 8.1 to windows 10 , The experience was really nice and windows 10 work beautifully of my system. But the only thing is i am not able to find Bluetooth in my system. May be some driver issue. I have troubleshooted many times but the problem as not been solved . So any one can please help me on this.

On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 10:34:40 +0000, Field Commander A9 wrote:
In-place upgrading from Windows 8.1 to Windows 10 will cause all desktop internet browsers to be unable to open any non-local web pages. You'll have to use netsh to reset the winsock stack to fix this.
Not necessarily. I've upgraded several systems here, ranging from tablets
to laptops to virtual machines with a combination of IE, Chrome, and
FireFox and I've not experienced this on a single system. Also, your post
is the first time I've seen this issue reported in the forums.
Paul Adare - FIM CM MVP
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard. -- BSD
fortune
Nah, the problem is that it doesn't have enough chlorine. -- Lionel in ASR
It also lacks an undertow for the weak ones. -- Joe Creighton in ASR

User Exit issue after upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for