User Limit Exceeded?
I am getting familiar with Adobe ConnectNow and I am told
that the user limit has been exceeded. Yet everyone has logged out
and the meeting ended and restarted. I am using FF3 on a Mac. I
have cleared private data.
This is on the free version that has a 3 person limit. Yet I
have ended the meeting and the three participants have closed their
computers.
Now, when the program has been started again and a person is
invited, the invitee gets a "user limit exceeded" page after
attempting to log in.
Great tool though with only minor bugs.
Dan
Dan Locke
If this is an Adobe Hosted meeting, then you need to call Adobe Support and advise them the complete meeting URL. If this is on your own Adobe Connect Server, then you can try rebooting the server to see if that ends the meeting. Again, Support can assist with this as well. Please understand that Acrobat is not part of the name since last year. The product is now called Adobe Connect.
Similar Messages
-
Free Account User Limit Exceeded After Premium Plus Upgrade
Earlier today I upgraded my account to Premium Plus and received an email confirmation stating that "The capacity and functionality of your subscription level will be in effect immediately." Unfortunately only 2 of my participants were given access. All others received the following message:
Meeting Limit Exceeded
The user limit for this meeting has been exceeded. Contact your meeting organizer for assistance.
Needless to say, I had to cancel this presentation after waiting for phone tech support for 15 minutes.
Please advise.
Thank you,
Claude Betancourt
Dow Jones & Co., Inc.Hello mcacbat,
I'd like to ask a similar question for you: How/Where could we translate the following sentence to another language? Is it possible to make some link to that, like Meeting/End meeting... menu in virtual classroom?
"The user limit for this account has been exceeded. Contact your meeting organizer for assistance."
Thank you for your help in advance.
Best regards,
Imre -
Mails to 1 particular user is getting bounced - Command time limit exceeded
I've about 100 mail clients. Since yesterday morning, I've had one user whose incoming emails have been getting bounced. I've run a "mailbfr -m user" w/o success. The server is current on updates and has been restarted. All other users are functioning correctly. Notes:
-IMAP account
-This user has a 4GB Sent folder. All other folders are under 2GB.
-This user has recently starting syncing Notes from a Blackberry.
THE SMTP LOG:
Oct 7 08:26:52 myserver postfix/pipe[488]: D1BCE11CE230: to=<[email protected]>, relay=cyrus, delay=1000, delays=0.01/0/0/1000, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (Command time limit exceeded: "/usr/bin/cyrus/bin/deliver")
A PORTION OF THE BOUNCE EMAIL SENT TO SENDER:
This is the mail system at host myserver.com.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<[email protected]>: Command time limit exceeded:
"/usr/bin/cyrus/bin/deliver"
Reporting-MTA: dns; myserver.com
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: AD79711CE1DD
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; [email protected]
Arrival-Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 08:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; [email protected]
Original-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
Action: failed
Status: 5.3.0
Diagnostic-Code: x-unix; internal software error
Any help?Solved. This person was in-process of moving Blackberry notes to the imap account. There was an interruption during the transfer phase and the server's Notes folder became bad somehow. When Mailbfr hit that particular folder, it stopped the rebuild process.
I removed the Notes folder and ran Mailbfr again. The Notes folder was recreated and the rebuild function completed.
Mail delivery has been restored to this user. -
License.Limit.Exceeded with 4x150 users licence and only 300 real users
We have 4x150 users licence, set to unlimited bandwith.
We get these messages in event viewer:
Connection rejected by server. Reason : [
License.Limit.Exceeded ] : (_defaultRoot_, _defaultVHost_) : Max
connections allowed exceeds license limit. Rejecting connection to
: our_app_name/.
It appends a lot since the last few days, even before last
update 2.0.3
At the same time, when we check the administration console,
the number in the _defaultVhost is much lowe than 600, the maximum
number of user that is allowed.
Licences are all OK in the administration console.
We have to restart the Flash server service to correct the
problem.
Please help...Hello mm_Patrick,
Thank you for your interest in this problem.
We restrict multiple access to the same application instance
on our service.
We operate a chat using fms. We experience, from time to
time, an application instance failure which results in the entire
room participants being disconnected. The application instance
however still shows the connections to the room at time of this
failure. The problem starts to compound itself as people try to
access the room ( connect to the application instance ). After the
start of this problem when we look in the admin console the live
log for the application instance does not show any new connection
attempts nor accept or failure to connect but the application
instance registers the connection against the total connect to the
application instance. People are unable to connect to this room. As
they continue to try they increase the connection number registered
for this application instance until the point that the application
instance total connected takes us past our license limit. The
application instance seems to register and collect the connections
even though there is no connection to the application instance. We
then start to see the logging of the license limit exceeded.
Please note that there are no error/warning messages
generated in logs that indicate anything has failed. We can only
determine that a failure once we start to experience the symptoms
described for the application instance.
We have experienced this issue in the past with fcs. It was
not until the last update of fcs that the probem went away.
However, fms 2.0.0 onward has always had this issue for us.
The problem with this issue is that it is difficult to create
and study. We can go 1 hour and crash or we may have success for
over two weeks.
In an attempt to search for a solution to the problem we have
started focussing on this comment in Adobe –TechNote:
http://www.adobe.com/go/d47f06c6
“In Server.xml, find the ResourceLimits node (around
line 181). It contains the Connector node (around line 203). Within
the HTTP node (around line 205), create a new line and insert
MaxConnectionThreads and give it an appropriate value:
<MaxConnectionThreads>20</MaxConnectionThreads>
The default is 10.”
We have found that by adding the change to our HTTP node that
we have lessened the frequency of our problem. Also, we have taken
all remoting away from the time of connection. We now accept all
connections and then do our work after connection.
Another step we have taken to minimize the impact of this
problem is to define the scope as “inst” in the
application.xml. By creating a separate fmscore.exe for each
application instance it gives us the ability to correct a problem
with a faulting application instances without disturbing our entire
server traffic.
Any further insight into this problem would be greatly
appreciated.
Regards,
iGx -
Domain user account limit exceeded
My company is running Windows Server 2012 R2 Essentials. I receive the error:
Domain user accounts limit exceeded
Alert details: Windows Server 2012 R2 Essentials supports a maximum of 25 domain users. If you want to upgrade your server to Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard, please follow the steps in resolution.
I am aware that the Domain User limit is set to 25. However, we have created, and have less than 25 active domain user accounts. The rest are 'system' users that are either disabled, or active but not real user accounts, and they became active within the system
themselves; in other words, we have less that 25 real people who have been created an account to use the domain.
Can someone please tell me what they count? 25 user accounts? Or 25 real, active users?
If it is 25 accounts in total, then it is slightly unfair as most of the accounts are therefore already taken before we add a single domain user.
If it is 25 real, active users, why do I receive the error message in the logs?Hi William Kirkman,
à
The rest are 'system' users that are either disabled, or active but not real user accounts, and they became active within the system themselves.
I’m a little confused with this sentence. Would you please provide some details of system users and let me
understand it clearly? Did you mean some Administrator accounts or any other?
Regarding to how count 25 user accounts, “Any user that appears in the dashboard counts against your total
of 25.” Robert answered in the following thread. Please refer to.
Admin
Account Setup as Part of Wizard Count Against 25 Users?
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Justin Gu -
Hi Everyone
My Connection Pool parameters JCO api.
client=300
user=SISGERAL_RFC
passwd=******
ashost=14.29.3.120
sysnr=00
size=10
I have these parameters on my Connection Pool and sometimes appear these wrongs in my application:
1.
2006-01-07 13:20:37,414 ERROR com.tel.webapp.framework.SAPDataSource - ##### Time limit exceeded. LOCALIZED MESSAGE = Time limit exceeded. KEY = RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE GROUP = 104 TOSTRING = com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (104) RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE: Time limit exceeded.
2.
2006-01-07 14:01:31,007 ERROR com.tel.webapp.framework.SapPoolConnectionManager - Timeout
Id like to know if is happening.
Are there something wrong with my connection pool?
What can be happening?
ThanksRaghu,
Thanks for your response.
Yes, the pool connections are in place according to the sAP note mentioned above.
Regards,
Faisal -
Short dump "Time limit exceeded" when searching for Business Transactions
Hello Experts,
We migrated from SAP CRM 5.2 to SAP CRM 7.0. After migration, our business transaction search (quotation, sales order, service order, contract etc) ends with the short dump "Time limit exceeded" in class CL_CRM_REPORT_ACC_DYNAMIC, method DATABASE_ACCESS. The select query is triggered from line 5 of this method.
Number of Records:
CRMD_ORDERADM_H: 5,115,675
CRMD_ORDER_INDEX: 74,615,914
We have done these so far, but the performance is still either poor or times out.
1. DB team checked the ORACLE parameters and confirmed they are fine. They also checked the health of indices in table CRMD_ORDER_INDEX and indices are healthy
2. Created additional indices on CRMD_ORDERADM_H and CRMD_ORDER_INDEX. After the creation of indices, some of the searches(without any criteria) work. But it takes more than a minute to fetch 1 or 2 records
3. An ST05 trace confirmed that the selection on CRMD_ORDER_INDEX takes the most time. It takes about 103 seconds to fetch 2 records (max hits + 1)
4. If we specify search parameters, say for example a date or status, then again we get a short dump with the message "Time limit exceeded".
5. Observed that only if a matching index is available for the WHERE clause, the results are returned (albeit slowly). In the absence of an index, we get the dump.
6. Searched for notes and there are no notes that could help us.
Any idea what is causing this issue and what we can do to resolve this?
Regards,
BalaHi Michael,
Thanks. Yes we considered the note 1527039. None of the three scenarios mentioned in the note helped us. But we ran CRM_INDEX_REBUILD to check if the table CRMD_ORDER_INDEX had a problem. That did not help us either.
The business users told us that they mostly search using the date fields or Object ID. We did not have any problem with search by Object ID. So we created additional indices to support search using the date fields.
Regards,
Bala -
Static credit check: credit limit exceeded for consignment issue delivery
Hi,
We are encountering a credit limit exceeded error in delivery creation for a consignment issue.
In SPRO config "Credit limit check for order types", no credit limit check is assigned to the order type. However, there is one assigned for the delivery type. Also, for CCAr/Risk cat./CG combination in OVA8 (Auto Credit Block Delivery), static credit check has been activated with error message reaction. Open orders and open deliveries were also activated. Customer exceeded credit exposure but user cannot release the order in any VKMx transactions as no credit limit check is assigned to the order type.
Given that this is the current setup, and the following conditions:
1. Credit limit for the customer cannot be increased
2. Oldest open item cannot be cleared just yet
Is there any way that we can proceed with delivery creation for this customer? The other order types have credit limit check so credit management team was able to release them. However, we are unsure on how to proceed with this consignment order. Kindly advise and thank you in advance for your help.We are encountering a credit limit exceeded error in delivery creation for a consignment issue.
but user cannot release the order in any VKMx transactions as no credit limit check is assigned to the order type.
Looks contradictory and it may need to run report RVKRED77 to reorganization of open credit values. Try to run the report in test system and then run in production system. After running the report, the use must be able to release in VKM* transaction.
Regards, -
PI 7.0: IDOCs struck in IDX5 with error "Time Limit Exceeded".
Hi All,
We have a File to IDOC scenario in PI 7.0. After mapping the IDOCs are posted from PI to ECC System.
On a normal day this interface works good, yesterday we received a huge file which resulted in the creation of about 25000 IDOCs from one single file. The mapping went fine, however the IDOCs created were not posted into ECC System. When we monitor the IDOCs using transaction code IDX5 in PI system, we found the error message as "Time limit exceeded", the user shown was "PIAFUSER". To overcome this error, we increased the time limit of PIAFUSER from default to about 1500 seconds.
Now, I want to push these IDOCs from PI into ECC System. Could you please let us know, how to push these IDOCs sitting in PI system to ECC?
We do not want to reprocess the file from the beginning. Please let us know if it is possible to push the IDOCs without processing the file? If yes, how to reprocess?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Manohar Dubbaka.Hi,
the help documentation is as follows:
Check the tRFC Status
Use
tRFC calls which transfer IDocs use the function module IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS at reception (before release 4.0: INBOUND_IDOC_PROCESS).
If an IDoc in the sending system has been passed to tRFC (IDoc status "03"), but has not yet been input in the receiving system, this means that the tRFC call has not yet been executed.
Activities
To check the status of the tRFC calls, choose Tools ® IDoc Interface/ALE ® Administration ® Monitoring ® Troubleshooting ® RFC Queue (SM58) and specify any additional selection criteria.
The program RSARFCEX restarts unsuccessful tRFC calls.
You cannot choose the option is being executed in background processing.
Best Regards,
Erik Hubers -
Error opening file/URL reference by alias and Administrative limit exceeded
Hello All,
Problem:
SMTP Error: 4.5.0 error opening file/URL reference by alias
and
Search failed with: netscape.ldap.LDAPException: error result (11); Administrative limit exceeded
Here is my configuration:
Windows 2000 server (without Active Directory)
SP4
Iplanet Messaging Server 5.2
Netscape Directory Server 4.16
IPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Hotfix 1.09 (built Jan 7 2003)
We have a group which we use to flash messages to all the users of the mail server. Till last week it was working fine but now I am not able to send messages to this group <group-name>.
There are around 800 (Eight Hundred) E-mail id the messaging server and the flashed message is supposed to go to all 800 + users.
Note: I have another group of 300 users and I am able to send an E-mail to this group of 300 users.
I am using Dynamic Group for Members list.
The error message I get while trying to send message to this group is
SMTP Error: 4.5.0 error opening file/URL reference by alias.
The corresponding error in mail.log file is
30-Jan-2004 10:55:21.40 41c.7e4.1098 tcp_intranet J 0 <group-name>@domain rfc822; <group-name>@domain domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 452 4.5.0 error opening file/URL referenced by alias: <group-name>@domain
Now when I construct and Test the LDAP URL from Console, the error I get is:
Search failed with: netscape.ldap.LDAPException: error result (11); Administrative limit exceeded
I have increased the various limits but I still get the same error when I send mail to that group or do a LDAP Test:
The deafult and new limits are:
Sizelimit: Default 2000 New 10000
Timelimit Default 3600 New 3600
Lookthroughlimit Default 5000 New 6000
The corresponding error entry in access log of slapd is:
30/Jan/2004:12:19:26 +051800] conn=34 op=213 RESULT err=11 tag=101 nentries=0 etime=2 notes=U
My search for Administrative limit problem and error opening file/URL error in Sun forum and other groups did get some hits but that did not solve my problem.
I will appreciate any suggestion/comments.
Thanks and Regards,
Maneesh BishtThanks Jay.
My problem has been fixed.
Your suggestion was to increase the lookthrough limit. As you would have noticed in my posting that I had increased this limit to 6000 but that did not solve my problem. Today I increased this limit to 10000. And after that I did not get "administrative limit exceeded" error. Also I do not get "error opening file/URL reference by alias" error while sending E-mail to a particular group of 800+ ids.
Regards,
Maneesh Bisht -
Hi,
I am running an ABAP program, and I get the following short dump:
Time limit exceeded. The program has exceeded the maximum permitted runtime and has therefore been terminated. After a certain time, the program terminates to free the work processfor other users who are waiting. This is to stop work processes being blocked for too long by
- Endless loops (DO, WHILE, ...),
- Database acceses with large result sets,
- Database accesses without an apporpriate index (full table scan)
- database accesses producing an excessively large result set,
The maximum runtime of a program is set by the profile parameter "rdisp/max_wprun_time". The current setting is 10000 seconds. After this, the system gives the program a second chance. During the first half (>= 10000 seconds), a call that is blocking the work process (such as a long-running SQLstatement) can occur. While the statement is being processed, the database layer will not allow it to be interrupted. However, to stop the program terminating immediately after the statement has been successfully processed, the system gives it another 10000 seconds. Hence the maximum runtime of a program is at least twice the value of the system profile parameter "rdisp/max_wprun_time".
Last error logged in SAP kernel
Component............ "NI (network interface)"
Place................ "SAP-Dispatcher ok1a11cs_P06_00 on host ok1a11e0"
Version.............. 34
Error code........... "-6"
Error text........... "connection to partner broken"
Description.......... "NiPRead"
System call.......... "recv"
Module............... "niuxi.c"
Line................. 1186
Long-running programs should be started as background jobs. If this is not possible, you can increase the value of the system profile parameter "rdisp/max_wprun_time".
Program cannot be started as a background job. We have now identified two options to solve the problem:
- Increase the value of the system profile parameter "rdisp/max_wprun_time"
- Improve the performance of the following SELECT statement in the program:
SELECT ps_psp_pnr ebeln ebelp zekkn sakto FROM ekkn
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_ekkn
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN p_lt_proj
WHERE ps_psp_pnr = p_lt_proj-pspnr
AND ps_psp_pnr > 0.
In EKKN we have 200 000 entries.
Is there any other options we could try?
Regards,
JarmoThanks for your help, this problem seems to be quite challenging...
In EKKN we have 200 000 entries. 199 999 entries have value of 00000000 in column ps_psp_pnr, and only one has a value which identifies a WBS element.
I believe the problem is that there isn't any WBS element in PRPS which has the value of 00000000. I guess that is the reason why EKKN is read sequantially.
I also tried this one, but it doesn't help at all. Before the SELECT statement is executed, there are 594 entries in internal table p_lt_proj_sel:
DATA p_lt_proj_sel LIKE p_lt_proj OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
p_lt_proj_sel[] = p_lt_proj[].
DELETE p_lt_proj_sel WHERE pspnr = 0.
SORT p_lt_proj_sel by pspnr.
SELECT ps_psp_pnr ebeln ebelp zekkn sakto FROM ekkn
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_ekkn
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN p_lt_proj_sel
WHERE ps_psp_pnr = p_lt_proj_sel-pspnr.
I also checked that the index P in EKKN is active.
Can I somehow force the optimizer to use the index?
Regards,
Jarmo -
Java.lang.OutOfMemoryError : GC Overhead Limit Exceeded on SOA server
Hi All,
We are facing to this java.lang.OutOfMemoryError : GC Overhead Limit Exceeded on issue and we have increased the physical memory of the server to 16GB.
Modules running in this machine are,
Oracle DB
Weblogic Admin server - 10.3.6.0
Imaging - 11.1.1.6.0
UCM
and SOA server
We can see all these components using only 50% of the memory. But when we trigger BPM instances it triggers above error and system gets really slow.
PermGen arguments are,
USER_MEM_ARGS=-Xms1024m -Xmx1536m -XX:PermSize=1024m -XXMaxPermSize=1024m
JAVA Memory arguments: -Xms1024m -Xmx1536m -XX:PermSize=1024m -XXMaxPermSize=1024m
This is our Development Environment and planning to give a user demo on this week... ;( but system is really slow....
What we are to do???
Quick responses greatly appreciated ...
ThanksYou have misspelled the max perm parameter. -XXMaxPermSize=1024m should be -XX:MaxPermSize=1024m
Not sure if that's the whole issue though.
Also take a memory dump and see what type of objects that fill upp your memory.
jmap -dump:format=b,file=$heap_file $proid
Also look at the parameters for generating a dump when OutOfMemoryError occurs:
-XX:HeapDumpPath=domain1.hprof
-XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError -
Trouble with PIX 501 user limit?
I have installed a Cisco PIX 501 at a client's site, and now a couple of weeks later we are having an issue where some computers cannot access the Internet. The PCs can ping the internal interface of the firewall, and can resolve hostnames. But about three of them cannot ping public IP addresses. I thought the arp cache might be corrupted on the switch, so we restarted that to no good effect.
I suspect that the client has somehow run up against the 10-user limit for their PIX 501 license.
The site has eight PCs and a server, so it doesn't seem like they should be going over the 10-user limit.
I'm not much of an expert when it comes to the PIX, so I wonder if someone can tell me how to determine whether this is the case, and maybe give me some tips on how to resolve the issue?
Thanks very much for any advice you can offer.
Best regards,
ZacAny chance you can help me make sense of this? Does it really look like we have exceeded the number of allowed connections by over 3400?
pixfirewall# show local-host
Interface inside: 10 active, 10 maximum active, 3493 denied
local host: <192.168.1.2>,
TCP connection count/limit = 12/unlimited
TCP embryonic count = 2
TCP intercept watermark = unlimited
UDP connection count/limit = 0/unlimited
AAA:
Xlate(s):
PAT Global 67.115.121.230(38600) Local 192.168.1.2(3553)
PAT Global 67.115.121.230(51033) Local 192.168.1.2(3215)
PAT Global 67.115.121.230(51037) Local 192.168.1.2(3230)
PAT Global 67.115.121.230(51050) Local 192.168.1.2(3271)
PAT Global 67.115.121.230(55215) Local 192.168.1.2(4084)
PAT Global 67.115.121.230(55228) Local 192.168.1.2(4136)
PAT Global 67.115.121.230(55231) Local 192.168.1.2(4139)
etc, etc. -
Ldap_search: Administrative limit exceeded
Hi I am running a number of DSCC 11.1.1.3.0 LDAP instances
within those instances I have configured the 'size limit' to unlimited (and restarted the server)
when an authenticated user does an ldapsearch they get the full search returned but when an anonymous users does the same search
they hit the 'Administrative limit exceeded' error.
what am I missing that would allow an anonymous user to return the full search?
Thanks in Advance.I assume you are connecting direct to a Directory Server and not via a Directory Proxy instance.
Have you checked if your bound users have any of the the following operational attributes set on them?
nssizelimit
nsTimeLimit
nsLookThroughLimit
Also take a look at the error code in the logs, it may be that your search is failing due to time or indexes rather than size of result. -
[LDAP: error code 11 - Administrative Limit Exceeded]
Hi,
I am trying to search LDAP and retrieve a attribute (checksecurity) based on the uid (hardcoded the uid), below is the code :
<invoke name='getResourceObjects' class='com.waveset.ui.FormUtil'>
<invoke name='getLighthouseContext'>
<ref>WF_CONTEXT</ref>
</invoke>
<s>person</s>
<s>Resource_LDAP</s>
<map>
<s>searchScope</s>
<s>ou=people,o=abc.com</s>
<s>searchAttrsToGet</s>
<List>
<String>checksecurity</String>
<String>uid</String>
</List>
<s>conditions</s>
<map>
<s>uid</s>
<s>AE8024T</s>
</map>
</map>
</invoke>
Below is the block trace :
<block name='Test' trace='true'>
<invoke name='getResourceObjects' class='com.waveset.ui.FormUtil'>
<invoke name='getLighthouseContext'>
<ref>WF_CONTEXT</ref> --> com.waveset.workflow.WorkflowEngine@539f0d
</invoke> --> com.waveset.server.InternalSession@17210a5
<s>person</s> --> person
<s>Resource_LDAP</s> --> Resource_LDAP
<map>
<s>searchScope</s> --> searchScope
<s>ou=people,o=abc.com</s> --> ou=people,o=abc.com
<s>searchAttrsToGet</s> --> searchAttrsToGet
<o>[checksecurity, uid]</o> --> [checksecurity, uid]
<s>conditions</s> --> conditions
<map>
<s>uid</s> --> uid
<s>AE8024T</s> --> 210014992
</map> --> {uid=AE8024T}
</map> --> {searchAttrsToGet=[checksecurity, uid], searchScope=ou=people,o=abc.com, conditions={uid=AE8024T}}XPRESS <invoke> exception:com.waveset.util.WavesetException: Can't call method getResourceObjects on class com.waveset.ui.FormUtil
==> com.waveset.util.WavesetException: Error searching for objects
==> javax.naming.LimitExceededException: [LDAP: error code 11 - Administrative Limit Exceeded]
Please let me know if anyone has come across this error.
Thanks & Regards
ArunYour LDAP server has search limits for the user you're logging in as (or, more likely, it has default limits, and you haven't made exceptions for that user).
If you're using Sun Directory Server, you can remove these limits by setting 'nsLookThroughLimit' and 'nsSizeLimit' both to -1 for that user.
Maybe you are looking for
-
We run a small network in our office consisting mainly of Intel iMacs we purchased several months ago. The server computer is a brand new Intel Mac Pro server with 4 500 gig drives raided together, two 2.66GHz dual core intel processors, all the othe
-
How do I copy my video files from iPhoto to iMovie? The two + hour wait for thumb nails and hour long wait looking for the right videos kills the time I have to edit.
-
Receive File Adapter - Error in CallSAPAdapter Name not known
Using xml to File Adapter. Just want to store the xml file somewhere ie on XI Server in folder E:\usr\sap\interface\XMLfiles Getting error in Adapter Engine - Exception caught by adapter framework: Object not found in lookup of CallSAPAdapter. Delive
-
DVD problems and questions?
Pretty new to using MAC so the learning curve has been steep. First I purchased a DVD cleaning disk and it will not work. For some reason the DVD player ejects it everytime I try to use it. How do you clean your DVD player? Second when DVD's are play
-
I am running Windows xp home edition 5.1.2600 and Firefox 3.6.12. I can use gmail in the HTML view, but would prefer the standard view.