User locked as ( Globally) locked by system manager in the central system"

Helo
I have an issue with unlocking a user id in Production, when i am trying to unlock a user in production system i am geting the message
"(Globally) locked by system manager in the central system"
could you please tel me how to unlock the user in regular way.
there is no CUA setup in our landscapes ,not sure what is wrong , please assist immediately
regards
jayu

> there is no CUA setup in our landscapes ,not sure what is wrong
No CUA setup but still error shows locked by system manager in the central system.Anyhow try to unlock the user by another method.use tcode ewz5 to unlock the user...let me know whether its working or not
> could you please tel me how to unlock the user in regular way.
http://www.sap-img.com/basis/different-methods-to-lock-or-unlock-sap-users.htm
Regards,
Rafikul

Similar Messages

The central system has no logical system name

I am encountering one error message during configuring the Chnage Request Management in solution manager. As follows.
The central system has no logical system name
Message no. SCDT_DIST034
How do i define it?

Hello,
You may define logical system name via Tcode SCC4. Select your client and there is dropbox for Logical System. Click on the dropbox and you may received message "No value.." and ask you if you want to define the new logical system.
Please ensure the rec. logical scheme is : <SID>CLNT<CLNTNO.>
Hope this could help you.
Regards,
AZLY

Could not access the central system - CUA problem

Hi all,
Please help me with this problem.
Its just a test scenario, when everything will be good here, i have to do the same for Production.
We just did upgrade our R3 system from 4.6 to ECC6.0.
I created CUA on DB1100 ( Dev BW 4.6 ) with two child systems 1) DC1150 ( Dev CRM 4.6)
2) DE1400 ( DEV ECC 6.0 ).
Now everything is working fine between DB1100 and DC1150..
It works like CUA ( DB1100) and child (DC1150) systems as it should be.
But connection between DB1100 and DE1400 is not working fine. When you go to SU01 in DE1400, it does not allow me to change anything. It means connection is there and DB1100 is taking DE1400 as child system but when i am updating any user information or roles in DB1100 it is not updating child system DE1400.
And when i went to tcode SCUA in DE1400 it gave me this error.
"Could not access the central system DB1100".
I dont know whats happening. I did same config in DE1400 as i did in DC1150. DC1150 is working fine but not DE1400.
The most weird thing is that DB1100 is thinking DE1400 as child system and i can not make any changes to DE1400 directly.
please help me with this. What i can do to make this working between DB1100 and DE1400??
i need to do the same in production if it gets passed.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi mala_swa,
seems that you have a problem with the rfc-connections....
Please check in both directions. The connection have to work without problems.
Check SCUL in DB1100 - what is the status of the distributed users? Errors, unconfirmed?
Check idocs in DE1400. Are there some? What is their status?
The most common error is coming from not working rfc-connections. That brings for instance problems while generationg partner profiles, etc. Also the strict naming convention (log. system name=system name in CUA landscape = name of used RFC-connections) has to be considered....
So that are some points, that you could check.
good luck,
Bernhard

During boot, the system says that the main system board maker cannot be identified

System: HP Pavilion dv7 Notebook, Windows 7 Home Premium
Problem: During boot, the system says that the main system board manufacturer cannot be identified. If I ignore and tell it to continue, it wants to CHDSK. If I skip that, the computer finishes booting and seems to operate normally.
How can I fix this?

Hi Gordoo3,
Can you expand on the hardware you are using (Chassis, Controller, Devices, etc.)? Do you have a MXI connection to your PC? Have you identified the chassis in MAX? Here is a Knowledgebase article that describes this process.
Best,
Adam
Academic Product Manager
National Intruments

SAP System is not the original system of the object being edited

Hi All,
We recently built a new system which is Copy of another system.We decomission our old system.Now when ABAPer is trying to edit Z/Y programs in se38 they are getting message "SAP System is not the original system of the object being edited".We already completed all post process after system copy.Client is open and status in Golbal modifiable in se06.
How we can resolve this situation.

Hello Guys,
Thks for your input.
@Vinod,
We rebuild new development system from the exsisting devlopment system and scrap old one.And yes thats true that new system is not the original system where object was created,its a replica of old dev to nev dev with SID change.
@Arjun,
I already check TADIR table and and its pointing to new SID.
@Ashok,
As i said earlier,post intallation is already completed.
Its a problem for developer who's getting some different format of screen when they editing development object ,like, when we perform manaul corretion in abap code through snote.They can see buttons to insert code line,delete line.
Thx,Nilesh

"the current system is not the original system" in uccheck

Hi Friends,
I get a message during the unicode conversion. Can u help me how to rectify this error.And also would be grateful if u can given some links regarding this issue and why this error message is raised.
"the current system is not the original system" in uccheck transaction of unicode conversion.
thank you
chandra

Do you still need help on this?
Please refer to SAP notes that can provide some hints
#997198 UCCHECK: The current system is not the original System
#963311 UCCHECK reports errors on XSLT sources
cheers,
Vincent

Refresh of BW System without deleting the source system

Hello experts
I want to know, is it possible to refresh BW system without deleting the source system.
That means I just do the renaming via BDLS and reconnect.
If I do so, do I have a post refresh activities.
According to OSS note 886102 and 184447, there are 3 scenarios:
Scenario A: You want to copy the entire system infrastructure connected by the BW source system connections (that means the entire system group).
Scenario B: You want to copy a single BW system of the group, the sourcesystem is not copied.
Scenario C: You want to replace a single sourcesystem of a BW-system with another system using a database or client copy (Example: Refresh of the OLTP consolidation system by a copy of the OLTP production system). The BW system is not copied
Assuming I use Scenario A, can I refresh BW system without deleting the source system.

Hi:
The primary source of information is the how to paper on this topic:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/bff13df2-0c01-0010-6ba7-bc50346a6fd8
YOu are correct, you can refreh the BI system without deleting the source system.
Thanks for any points you assign (after all, I wrote the paper!).
Best Regards -
Ron Silberstein
SAP

CUA can be used between 2 clients which are in the central system

Hi
Question 1:
In case of CUA, we have the conecept of central system and child systems. From Central system we will be able to administer child system. Buy my question is can we implement CUA with the clients which are also on the central system ?
Question 2:
Normally LDAP is connected to central system and central system inturn will be connected to child systems. But Can we connect Central system and LDAP to the child system at a time ? Is there any situaitons where we will come up with this situations ?
Thanks
Kumar

Hi,
> In case of CUA, we have the conecept of central system and child systems. From Central system we will be able to >administer child system. Buy my question is can we implement CUA with the clients which are also on the central system ?
>
Yes, you can control other clients of the central system through CUA.
> Question 2:
> Normally LDAP is connected to central system and central system inturn will be connected to child systems. But Can we >connect Central system and LDAP to the child system at a time ? Is there any situaitons where we will come up with this >situations ?
If you want to use CUA then your LDAP must be connected to your central system.
Thanks
Sunny

Can the central system and the sender system at different time zone?

We have a control(i.e. central) system which is 6 hours ahead of the sender system.
When processing step "analyse tables in sender system", we get short dumps immediately at control , sender and receiver.
On the sender, the short dump reads:
Runtime Errors         CALL_FUNCTION_SEND_ERROR
Date and Time          01/15/2011 16:09:05
Short text
     " " (I/Oerror)
What happened?
     "CPIC-CALL: 'ThCMSEND' : cmRc=18 thRc=0#Statistics not active "
An error occurred when executing a Remote Function Call.
On the central system the short dump reads:
Runtime Errors         CALL_FUNCTION_REMOTE_ERROR
Date and Time          15.01.2011 22:09:00
Short text
     "Field symbol has not yet been assigned."
On the receiver the short dump reads:
Runtime Errors         GETWA_NOT_ASSIGNED
Date and Time          01/15/2011 22:09:00
Short text
     Field symbol has not yet been assigned.
What happened?
     Error in the ABAP Application Program
The current ABAP program "SAPLCNVTDMS_BW_FUNCTIONS_REM" had to be terminated .
We never get this error before on this step. The only thing I can think of is that the sender and the central system
are at different time zone.
Please share your experience.
Thanks!

Hi,
By looking at the runtime error , the reason of the dump should not be the timestamp diff .
You can create an OSS ticket with SAP for further analysis.
Also, there can be data consistency issues due to time diff .
Cheers
Sandeep

Users are created but Roles are not Provisioned in the Target System

Hi,
It would be great if somebody would provided solution to my problem. The problem is when I try to create the Users in Identity Managment UI then the Users are created in the Target systems but the Roles are not provisioned to the Users.
In the provisioning job SetABAPRole&ProfileForUser,
It is says In the Error putNextEntry failed storing
Exception from Modify operation:com.sap.idm.ic.ToPassException: User does not exist
MSKEY 58437
Please note the When we create the User, the user is created however the Roles is not provisioned to the user.
Regards,
Hakim

Hello Nits,
since this thread is from 2010 and the OP was logged on last in 2012 (as you can see in the profile), I don't think you'll get an answer here.
Please create a new thread to explain your problem (with version and SP numbers, logs etc). You can add a link to this thread to show, that the problem is similar.
Regards,
Steffi.

Canot display the remote system logs in the A51 system in the sm21

Hi firend,
could you plase help to me, i could not able to see the remote system logs in sm21 transaction.How can overcome this problem
Thanks,
Lakshmankumar.

Lakshmankumar,
Have you done system copy? or is it a new installation?
We had this problem after we have done system copy on to new system (New Hardware).
You can check the URL provided by Juan Reyes.
I also suggest checking few more things like below.
Are you able to see instances from SM21 u2192 system log u2192 choose u2192 remote system log u2192 instance name u2013 check to see if you are able to see other application servers are not.
If you are not able to see other apps servers try these steps.
Execute the function module TH_SERVER_LIST on all application servers (start SE37, insert TH_SERVER_LIST, press F8, press F8 again). As a result you will get a table "LIST", with a mouse clickthe contents of the table will be displayed. In the column "SERV" normally the sapdp* services should be displayed,these are used to connect to the dispatcher of the instance. Most probably you will not see a sapdp<nn> entry but some strange names,e.g. cpq-tasksmart, intraintra, tick-port.
In this case please check the/etc/services file (if using Unix) of all application servers. All duplicate entries of the interval 3200 to 3299 should be commented out if they are already used for the sapdp<nn> services.
After the restart of the instances the function module should return allsapdp* ports correctly and all remote syslogs should be displayed now.
Thanks,
Venkat.

Why does reindex documents at Server in the Configuration Manager break the help system?

Background:
So, I have a nice hosted help system on Server 9. I'm using the Access database since it's a light load project. It works OK. All admin features work OK (except groups and users bug, unrelated), including reports on search and usage. So, I have been having a devil of a time making a particular search term work in my project: UTS. It's an acronym for a system at my work, and it's important that users be able to search on it. UTS is in several Heading 1s. It's not in the stop list as a typo. Just to be sure, I deleted the whole stop list. I added "UTS" as a topic keyword. It still refuses to find any results. Also, I've noticed some other peculiarities with search: the "context" displayed below the search result is supposed to show the word you searched for in its context, but it never does in my search results. It just shows the first words of the document it's listed as a hit in search. The search is not bad, but these two bugs were odd enough to me to start rooting around for solutions.
So, I run Server 9 on Windows Server 2008 R2 with Tomcat 7 and JDK 7u17.
The problem:
I noticed in all the Server documentation that Adobe crows about the wonderful full text search powered by Lucene, and how it's checked "on" by default in all contexts. It's not in mine. When I check "reindex documents at server," it breaks the project. Literally--Server can't find the project anymore, web calls come back with no answer. Uncheck the box, A-OK. So, why is this wonderful search technology not available to me? Is it because it's not available when using default Access? Or is something else going on here?
many thanks in advance.
David Morgan
Robohelp HTML11/Server 9 user

The problem is that my data collection software (VisualPlant by EMT) is unable to browse to the National Instruments.LookoutOPCServer. When I added an Identification category to the registry entry for the lookout OPC server I was able to connect but with some odd behavior. My setup is:
2 machines each running Win NT4 SP6a. One machine is running Lookout as well as several other OPC servers. The other is running my data collection software. I am able to connect to lookout using several client apps on my data collection machine (Kepware's Quick Client, and Matrikon's Client), however my data collection software (VisualPlant) cannot see Lookout. Using the NI server explorer and viewing the properties of all of my OPC servers I noticed that Lookout was the on
ly one listed that did not have a CatID. By modifying the registry and adding the ID's listed in my original note I was able to connect using VisualPlant, however this exibited some odd behavior. It appears that adding this setting prevents multiple OPC connections to Lookout. If you have any suggestions I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks.

If user login in portal we need to assign him, the perticular system

Hi all,
i have the requirement
if user logins in portal, depending on the user we need to assign him a system( bapi or rfc),
the user database is maintained in a table in MDM. if an user login in portal it should check in MDM to which region(america, asia.europe....) it belog,s to. according to that we need to assign the system(rfc or bapi). if the user belong's to two regions we need to assign the two links(rfc's or bapi's) regions,
help me in doing step by step
Thanks in advance
Best Regards
charan

Hi Charan,
This is same thread as - Depending on the user we need to assign the system
Regards,
Sen

Restricting the systems items on the 'find system items' window

I am trying to do some customizatiosn on form POXPOEPO. block PO_LINES and item_name is po_lines.item_number which is beside field 'Type' (line_type). when the three dots are pressed then a window appears to input 'enter reduction criteria for long list' when the percentage is pressed 'System Items' find window appears listing all the items defined. what i want this window to display only those items for which item_type = 'Consums' on MTL_system_items and 'user item type' on 'master item' definition window tab 'main'.
What is the way to achieve this.
i did like this but it is not working:
procedure event(event_name varchar2) is
form_name varchar2(30) := name_in('system.current_form');
block_name varchar2(30) := name_in('system.cursor_block');
item_name varchar2(60) := name_in('system.cursor_item');
begin
if (event_name = 'WHEN-NEW-ITEM-INSTANCE') then
     if (form_name='POXPOEPO') then
          if (block_name='PO_LINES') then
               if (item_name='PO_LINES.ITEM_NUMBER') then
                    FND_MESSAGE.SET_STRING('Iam here now');
                    fnd_message.show;
               fnd_key_flex.update_definition(
               BLOCK=>'PO_LINES',
               FIELD=>'ITEM', -- tried various things here like 'ITEM_NUMBER_MIR, PO_LINES.ITEM_NUMBER
               ENABLED=>'Y',
               WHERE_CLAUSE=>'item_typet = ''Consums'''
               end if;
               end if;
     end if;
else
null;
end if;
end event;
any guidance in this regard is appreciated.
PS: nav: purchasing super user->purchase orders->purchase orders

Hi,
Please can you tell me How did you resolved this?
I want to modify the Item List as follows: show me all items on mtl_system_items_b where attribute10='Y'.
I did It:
IF( form_name = 'POXPOEPO' AND block_name = 'PO_LINES' and item_name='PO_LINES.ITEM_NUMBER') then
fnd_key_flex.update_definition( BLOCK=>'PO_LINES'
,FIELD=>'ITEM_NUMBER'
,ENABLED=>'Y'
,WHERE_CLAUSE=>'ATTRIBUTE10=''Y'' '
END IF;
But the list not show me all items where attribute10='Y'. I don't know why.
I see that list only show me the items where organization of master organization.
I would like to know: How to the standart forms define flexfield and where?. If i know it i guess i can show all items.
Thnks

Am upgrading to Lion. Does anyone know if this new system will replace the operating system presets for printing that are on Leopard?

Having trouble with my print operating system. It will not hold presets. If I upgrade to Lion, will Lion replace Leopard's print operating system?

harrietny wrote:
Having trouble with my print operating system. It will not hold presets. If I upgrade to Lion, will Lion replace Leopard's print operating system?
It'll likely replace the printer drivers too since some older drivers may rely on Rosetta, which Lion eliminates. Along with new drivers, you may loose printing capabilities, as I did with a legacy Epson printer. Since you're in the Mac Pro forum, if you actually have a Mac Pro, it might be wise to install an additional hard disk and run the Lion upgrade on that. Try it out and see if you actually get an improvement. If not, you've still got Leopard to retreat to and an extra disk to back up on.

User locked as ( Globally) locked by system manager in the central system"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for