User master record not sufficiently maintain for object authori

Dear Friends,
I am getting error in the query for one of the test user id "User master record not maintained sufficiently for object authori".
I have authorization variable call zso_auth, zdc_auth for authroization for sales office and distribution channel.  I have maintained value in pfcg.  Please help. What will be problem.
Regards,
Chetana Kotian

HI Sourav,
It means that you are not authorized to see the ODS data. (Your BW logon ID has not been added to the users list of the Role.
Regards,
R.Ravi

Similar Messages

  • Update termination Error : Maintain Output device in User master record

    Hi All,
    For transaction IW32 when print is given we have getting Update termination error : Maintain Output device in User master record.
    I have set the user_settings = Space, for output_Options passed the output device . Even for control_paramters I have passed the device while calling the Smartform . However there is no use. Still I am getting the update termination error.
    Please let me know how to solve this issue. Any OSS Note is there for this.
    Thanks in Advance!
    Regards,
    Preethi G

    Hi,
    Thanks for the reply. There is no problem in the print program .
    In the user master record , if the output device is not given and in the print program if we pass the output device. the error is coming.Is there any way to solve the issue at the print program level with out maintaining the user master.Please let me know.
    Many Thanks!
    Regards,
    Preethi G

  • Digital Signature - Setup User master record for Particular group of user

    I already setup Electronic signature for RR and UD. but having problem to complete transaction.
    When a Digital signature is executed, the system should copies the signatory name from the user master record to the signed document. However, the name has not been maintained completely in user master record and for this reason, i cannot execute the signature. So how can i setup User master record for Particular group of user?
    Regards,
    NP

    It is actuly comes under QM module to save the test record, but before saving it, we need to have authorization.
    For authorization, we are having digital signature.
    So i need to assign user group for particular those authorization digital signature. so i thought, might be IDM can help on that?
    How would i do that? so are you guys able to help me on that ?
    Thank you
    NP

  • User Master Records/Tables - Exporting User tables for Recovery

    Hi there,
    Work in the Security area ....Outside of the client export of SCC8 for user master records/roles. Is there another recommended method for saving user tables that can be re-imported on the chance of deletion of users and roles and can be selectively re-imported if needed. For instance if a particular User Grouip was deleted with X number of users, could that be re-imported by a selective means ? SU10 is handled delicately in prod when used but unwanted results still occur. Approaches appreciated ..

    Hi,
    Try the following..
    BAPI_USER_CREATE         Create a User
    BAPI_USER_CREATE1       Create a User 
    Hope that helps! 
    Regards,
    Tanveer
    <b>Please mark helpful answers</b>

  • Getting Error: The number range is not maintained for Object/Year: J_1ILIC/

    Hi Gurus,
    When I try to capture deemed export license from J1ILIC01 I get this error
    The number range is not maintained for Object/Year: J_1ILIC/
    I tried to maintain number ranges in SNRO & SNUM  there the changes are saved but I am not able to capture the license and receive the same error again. Please help.

    Hi
    Just check if you have maintained number range for the correct year as shown in error.
    Goto SNRO/SNUM enter the object ID and click on number range .Maintain there for that particular year.

  • The number range is not maintained for Object/Year: J_1ILIC/

    Hello,
    I am facing the problem as
    After Created the No range object j_1ilic for excise bond, for capturing the CT3 form in J1ILIC01 and maintain the required fields in J1ILIC01, following error is occuring
    "The number range is not maintained for Object/Year: J_1ILIC/"
    Kindly advice on the same
    Thanx in advance
    Shailesh

    Hi,
    You will have maintain the Number range for the Lisence for the object J_1ILIC through SNRO.
    Regards,
    Murali

  • User master records

    Hey everybody!
    I'm a newbie in the SRM-topic. Do I have to maintain 'user master records' in SRM and in the ERP? If I only maintain in SRM, how is this booked in the Backend-System (without 'user master records')?
    Thanks in advance,
    Felix

    Felix,
    It is not mandatory to maintain the same User Master Record in SRM and ERP. The User Master record is maintained in SRM for end users perfoming shopping cart functionality or processing any other request pertaining to SRM. Follow on documents booked in the backend system are created by a background RFC user which facilitates the connection between SRM and the backend system.
    Also a User Master record (SU01 User) is maintained in SRM so that this will facilitate the creation on an EBP user. An EBP user consists of the followings objects:
    1.) Position
    2.) SU01 User
    3.) Central Person
    4.) Business Partner
    The relationship built between these objects creates an EBP user which can perform shopping. These relationships are stored in table HRP1001.
    Please assign points, if answer is usefull !!
    Sundeep

  • User Master Record and IT105

    Is there a BADi or User Exit that can be implemented that updates the Telephone Field in IT105 if you change the Telephone Field in the User Master Record via SU01
    or
    If you change the Telephone Field in the User Master Record via SU01 that it updates the Telephone Field in IT105.
    Also, can this be somehow linked into IT0032 - Internal Data - Telephone fields
    Thanks
    WB

    HI Will,
    Use the below mathod to find out whether an relevant BADI are there.
    1. Go to the TCode SE24 and enter CL_EXITHANDLER as object type.
    2. In 'Display' mode, go to 'Methods' tab.
    3. Double click the method 'Get Instance' to display it source code.
    4. Set a breakpoint on 'CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_class_name_by_interface'.
    5. Then run the transaction SU01 in change mode and change the phone no.
    6. The screen will stop at this method.
    7. Check the value of parameter 'EXIT_NAME'. It will show you the BADI for that transaction. Check whether its relevant or not.
    Br/Manas

  • SAP R/3 Mass User Master Record Update

    I am currently involved in a project to update specific fields of the User Master Record for all applicable records from an external source.
    For the mass change i was thinking along the lines of CATT, BDC/ABAP or Table Changes. Obviously table changes was out first because of the dangers of causing inconsistencies among the SAP standard tables. CATT i think is not really made for this purpose but could probably do the job, and BDC or ABAP is probably the right way to go.
    Any suggestions/comments?
    Thanks

    hello Ashley,
    All 3 options are good.
    I personally use CATT for this purpose however it depends on what your trying to update. SU10 is another option but its drawback is that you can use only 1 value at a time. In CATT however you can use different values for different users. Also time involved in creating CATT tool is very less.
    Obviously you have options like BDC/LSMW and ABAP also with you.
    Regards.
    Ruchit.

  • Export and import user master records

    Hi,
    We are planning for system refresh activity. So I am planning Production server data to copy in Quality server. I want retain Quality server users like that only.  Is there any way I can export user master records and import it later?
    Please advice us.
    Our environment is 4.6 C, Oracle 10g, windows 2003 server.
    Regards
    Satya

    Hello Satyanarayana,
    please be aware, that with SAP_USER standard change logs are not copied. So if you have such in your QAS, they will be propably overwritten by the PRD content. You will loose then change logs for role changes, which are kept in the standard change documents (cdpos,cdhdr).
    User change docs are copied together with the users with provfile SAP_USER.
    That is just for your information. In general there will not be change documents for roles in QAS.....
    b.rgds, Bernhard

  • Date format in user master record cannot be interpreted

    When running an Infopackage from BW to an R/3 customer extractor, the R/3 job cancels with this error message, "Date format in user master record cannot be interpreted". I can restart the R/3 job program from the ABAP editor screen using the same variant that BW issued and the job runs without cancelling.
    NOTE: This process runs without any errors on our QAS system.
    Any idea what causes this error message and how I can fix it?

    Hi Alan,
    I have resolved this issue by myself. Same just like yours mine is also a custom Datasource.
    Solution for this is go to source system check your Background user id i.e like BWALEREMOTE or ALEREMOTE which ever id you have created for setting up RFC connection between R/3 & BW. Check your Date format which has been set for your background user. Use the second format mm/dd/yy. Then run your extraction you will not face any problem.
    If you still have any problem do let me know. If this solution helps you assign points.
    Regards,
    Bhuvana.

  • Comparing User Master Records in SAP ECC 6.0

    Hi,
    I have 2 questions,
    1.We have an issue with user master records comparison. we have assigned a certain role to the user with validity till 15.11.2010. But user had authorizations related to this role till 21.11.2010.  The profile got deleted on 21.11.2010 from user record instead of 15.11.2010.Further I noticed that there was fresh assignment for this role as on 18.11.2010 for another new user. whenever fresh assignment happens the user master record should happen automatically but it is not the case here ? what can be reason ?
    2.By google I have found one report PFCG_TIME_DEPENDENCY which can be scheduled as a background job periodically for user masster records comparision. I just want to know will there be any adverse impact on system performance if we run such jobs periodically ?
    Please help.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Syam sundara babu.v

    Hi Nikhil,
    1.We have an issue with user master records comparison. we have assigned a certain role to the user with validity till 15.11.2010. But user had authorizations related to this role till 21.11.2010. The profile got deleted on 21.11.2010 from user record instead of 15.11.2010.Further I noticed that there was fresh assignment for this role as on 18.11.2010 for another new user. whenever fresh assignment happens the user master record should happen automatically but it is not the case here ? what can be reason ?
    This happens if the role is assigned twice and only 1 instance is removed.
    2.By google I have found one report PFCG_TIME_DEPENDENCY which can be scheduled as a background job periodically for user masster records comparision. I just want to know will there be any adverse impact on system performance if we run such jobs periodically ?
    The PFCG_TIME_DEPENDENCY job is required to perform the user master record comparison, so that these kind of inconsistencies will not occur. There will not be any system performance issues and it should be scheduled to run Dialy after 00:00 hours, so that the expired profiles will be deleted.
    Alternatively, you can use PFUD transaction to create this job or to run the comparison once.
    Hope this answers!!
    Best Regards,
    Raghu
    Edited by: Raghu Boddu on Nov 24, 2010 9:06 PM

  • Missing Field error when modifying user Master Record

    We are using our corporate LDAP to authenticate our portal users and do not have (nor do we want) write permission to the LDAP. We are using additional attributes (ume.admin.addattrs) to hold information pertinent to the portal. We are running into a problem though when required information is missing from the LDAP user master record. For example, if the users email address is missing, when we attempt to save a user's record with the additional attributes we need, the system responds with a "Missing Field" error message and will not save the additional attribute until the LDAP record is complete. Currently the only work around to this problem is to notify the LDAP administrators and have them update the record (not a high priority for them).
    Is there a way to have the portal ignore incomplete records and just save what it has?
    Thanks
    Ken Burd

    We are using our corporate LDAP to authenticate our portal users and do not have (nor do we want) write permission to the LDAP. We are using additional attributes (ume.admin.addattrs) to hold information pertinent to the portal. We are running into a problem though when required information is missing from the LDAP user master record. For example, if the users email address is missing, when we attempt to save a user's record with the additional attributes we need, the system responds with a "Missing Field" error message and will not save the additional attribute until the LDAP record is complete. Currently the only work around to this problem is to notify the LDAP administrators and have them update the record (not a high priority for them).
    Is there a way to have the portal ignore incomplete records and just save what it has?
    Thanks
    Ken Burd

  • TDMS user master records over written

    Hello All, I ran TDMS copy (Time sliced) and noticed user master records got over written. (Example: After log into the system, the menu is displaying different name instead of my name. This happened for all users.
    Do we need to exclude tables related to user master records?   As per TDMS guidelines, the process will not touch user master records.
    Please advise. Did any one ran in to the saem issue ?
    regards,
    Srinivas

    Hi,
    You are right , TDMS will not touch user master records.
    Check tables ADRP which is transfered in full and USR21 which is not transfered in both sender and reciever systems.
    Regards,
    Sandeep

  • User Master record

    Hi Experts,
    I need to maintain mail id in my user master record.
    Please tell me what is the Tcode for it and how to do it  .
    Thanks in advance,
    MK

    Thanks Atish.
    Yes, i don't have access to SU01 transaction.
    And Basis requested me to update my user master record with the email address .
    So, Is there any other of doing it ? or should i revert it back to Basis again.

Maybe you are looking for