User should not be getting this email

1) An External user sends email to another external user (JSMITH), and to one of my users internally.
2) The external user (JSMITH) gets his email, no problems there. My internal user gets his OK too.
3) But, it's also sending the email to another of my internal users (he's called JSMITH to). He shouldn't be getting it.
Internally, this is how things are defined in my System Address Book;
- I have an external domain that lists all the external addresses we can send to.
- One of them happens to be #2 above, JSMITH, and he's defined as JSMITH.xxx.gc.ca.
- Of course I have the internal GroupWise user JSMITH.postoffice.domain ... whom should not be getting this email.
Looks like some sort of address resolution issue.
Let me know if more info is required to understand this scenario.
DS

>Looks like some sort of address resolution issue.
It sure looks like that.
What version of GWIA are you running and on what platform?
The domain for external JSMITH, confirm that it didn't some how get
added to your systems list of internal domains.
Also useful to check the GWIA logs to see if the message is getting
sent back out to the external JSMITH shortly after it arrives.
Andy Konecny
KonecnyConsulting.ca in Toronto, supporting system throughout Ontario
Andy's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=75037

Similar Messages

I have an iphone 4 which was lost on the bus ride home from an amusement park with my class. The phone does not have find my iphone on it and i cannot track it. Is there anything you guys would say i should do to get this phone back.

I have an iphone 4 which was lost on the bus ride home from an amusement park with my class. The phone does not have find my iphone on it and i cannot track it. Is there anything you guys would say i should do to get this phone back.

Call it and ask whoever answers to give it back to you.

How do I disable editing of pages in author mode? User should not be able to edit content . Can this

How do I disable editing of pages in author mode? User should not be able to edit content . Can this be customized on component basis?

You have to remove modify rights for those users on that page. Component basis is possible but will create ACL complications. Please check http://dev.day.com/docs/en/cq/current/developing/components/boilerplates.html for that.
Yogesh
www.wemblog.com

Why did I get this email. Seems like a scam. I don't speak french

Ché(e) client(e),
Il est venu à notre attention que vos relevés de compte de l'information de facturation sont hors de jour. Cela vous oblige à mettre à jour vos informations de facturation. Le défaut de mettre à jour votre dossiers se traduira par compte tremination.
Cliquez sur le lien ci-dessous refernce et entrez vos informations de connexion sur le suivant
Page de confirmer vos dossiers d'information sur la facturation ...
Verifiez maintenat pour confirmer vos dossiers d'information de facturation.
Merci,
L'assistance a la clientéle Apple
copyright 2013 Apple Inc. Please do not reply to this email because we are not monitoring this inbox. To get in touch with us, log in to your account and click "Contact Us" at the bottom of any page. TM et copright ? 2013 Appel Inc. Appel Sales International, Hollyhill Industrail Estate, Cork, Ireland. Num?o d'immatriculation de la soci??: 15719. Num?o de TVA : IE6554690W. Tous droit r?erv? / Tenez-moi inform?/ Engagement de confidentialit?/ Mon Appel ID Si vous ne souhaitez plus recevoir d'e-mail de la part d'Apple ou si votre adresse e-mail a chang? veuilez cliquer ici..

We are not Apple. We are just users like yourself. I would ignore it.

User should not be able to import a request.

Dear Forum,
We have a role created with all the transaction (*) given to a user.
We want to revoke/restrict the authorization to import a request. User be able to create/edit/release the request but should not be able to import. This should happen without changing to existing (*) but at the same time user should not able to import.
<removed_by_moderator>
Regards,
DD
Edited by: Julius Bussche on Feb 18, 2009 10:48 AM

> And in the new role you can restrict the user.
I suspect the how was the original question. S_TRANSPRT is the (already given) answer. Deriving will do nothing for that object as not one of its fields is organizational. Besides that, restricting some more objects to make sure the user cannot create and/or use any workarounds is essential to make this work properly.
The additional request This should happen without changing to existing (*) scares me a bit. Why do these users need over 70000 transactions?

User should not be able to change the payment terms

Dear All,
My issue is that user should not be able to change the payment terms in any of the document.I have tried to do it through authorization but it is not working out.
Mona.

Dear Mona,
This may only be done through SP_Transaction_Notification.
Thanks,
Gordon

HELP!!!! ORA-01858 By creating user or reset password get this error

By creating user or reset password get this error:
Data Error: ORA-01858: found a non-digital world where expecting one numerical ORA-06512: at "DERWEB.ORA_ASPNET_MEM_RESETPASSWORD", line 80 ORA-06512: at line 1

Hi
You get this error when profile class amounts are not set for all the currency. Go back to your profile and ensure that the profile amounts are set for all the currencies found, whether you are using it or not.
Regards

How to disable Refresh,Reload in browser and user should not allow to multiple browser sessions ?

Dear All,
How to disable Refresh,Reload in browser and end user should not allow to multiple browser sessions in portal.Where we need to configure the settings or any code in masthead or any other component. My server version is 7.4 - SP5 .Please help us.
Thanks for advance,
BR,
Durga Rao.

Dear all,
i am able to logoff the click refresh button on keyboard.I am using this code to log off the user into the portal.
document.onkeydown = function(e)
var key;
if (window.event) key = event.keyCode
else
var unicode = e.keyCode ? e.keyCode : e.charCode
key = unicode
switch (key)
{ //event.keyCode
case 116: //F5 button
LSAPI.sessionPlugin.logoff();
event.returnValue = false;
key = 0; //event.keyCode = 0;
return false;
case 82: //R button
if (event.ctrlKey)
LSAPI.sessionPlugin.logoff();
event.returnValue = false;
key = 0; //event.keyCode = 0;
return false;
case 91: // ctrl + R Button
LSAPI.sessionPlugin.logoff();
event.returnValue= false;
key=0;
return false;
Thanks.
But i am unable to control the multiple windows opening the browser.So any one can tell me the how to block the new window and new tab/duplicate tab option.
BR,
Durga Rao.

User should not be allowed to login 2 times to an application from same m/c

Hi Everyone,
I have to find all possible solutions to below problem:
Problem: User should not be allowed to login 2 times to an application from same machine.
Steps to produce the problem:
1) User 1 logins to application.
2) User 1 tries to login with different credentials from same machine.
3) User 1 should be presented with a message that he cannot login from same machine using 2 browsers.
4) User 2 tries to login to application with credentials of user 1. System should now display an alert to both users on System 1 and System 2 of this conflict.
Please share your thoughts regarding above problem.
Thank you
Edited by: rishab.garg on Feb 25, 2009 10:53 PM

When a user logs in to application flag it in database. Irrespective of client machine and browser when another user tries to login using same user id you will be able to identify that easily using stored flag against the user id.
If you want to distinguish between client machine for displaying different messages you can easily do this by comparing client IP address. To obtain client IP address use:
request.getRemoteAddr();Note that getRemoteAddr() might return last proxy machine's IP address (in case proxy is used) instead of client's machine. In that case you may consider using cookie (though using cookie is not a great idea).
Thanks,
Mrityunjoy
Edited by: mrityunjoy on 28 Feb, 2009 11:43 PM

User should not be voiding the dispute created by other User

Hi,
I having an Issue at my work place.I have got a Requirement from the Finance Functional Folks that the user should be able to create the dispute case and also void the case created by him.But the user should not be able to void the dispute case created by the Other user.
As of now when I am testing the user is able to void the dispute case created by him and also void the dispute case created by other user.So now I am trying to restrict so that user should not be able to void the dispute case created by other user.
In the Roles Built at work place I have fdm_coll01-collections Management and also udm_dispute-dispute manamgement T-codes built in One Role.can any one of you let me know at which authorization object this can be restricted as I am having a hard time trying to find out.
In Ideal SAP World what my idea was a Dispute case created by the user in Production should not be allowed to void the dispute case.so creating a dispute case and voiding a dispute case should be treated differently and should be done by different persons in an organization.

In Ideal SAP World what my idea was a Dispute case created by the user in Production should not be allowed to void the dispute case.so creating a dispute case and voiding a dispute case should be treated differently and should be done by different persons in an organization.
So why not talk back to your FI Folks. Also check with your Compliance Team.
But anyhow, I do not see in the real world a conflict of duties by giving access to both creating a Dispute and voiding a dispute and more over voiding a dispute is considered critical since it would allow to Release Blocked Orders.
But the user should not be able to void the dispute case created by the Other user.
If every transcation and conversation with a Customer is recorded in the Collections Management system, I do not see a requirement for the same Team Member having access to close a dispute created by other user.
AB.

User should not release the PR which is created by him

Hi
We didnu2019t use work flow functionality for PR Release. So same user can create PR and release the same PR in our system. Our requirement is user should not release the PR which is created by him. I would like to put this control in system.
How can I achieve this requirement?
Thanks
Jeny

Hi Ravi
Thanks for your reply. but they need to have authroization for PR release . bec they are eligble to release PR as per delegation of authroity. but they should not release their own PR . they can relase other's PR within their level.
Jeny.

]The requirement is that users should not allow them to save if the indic

hi guys
when u are doing GR in the excise tab page if u find an icon (yellow one) called more data if u click that one u go to other screen where u will find a tab page named miscellaneous ther u can see MRP indicator check.
The requirement is that users should not allow them to save if the indicator is not ticked.
help me guys
kiran

You can either use Tcode NACE for output procedure pr follow following path in SPRO:
IMG - SD - Basic Functions - Output control - Output Determination - Maintain Output Determination for Billing Documents - Maintain Output Determination Procedure
There for your output procedure used for the desired output type maintain requirement routine as 62 : Billing doc released to acctng.
This requirement is met if the billing document is complete checking the header, pricing, and all items and has already been passed to financial accounting. The requirement also checks that the document is not relevant for an invoice list. This requirement can be assigned to billing document output condition types that should only be processed when the billing document is complete and forwarded to accounting. This requirement can only be used with billing documents.
Regards
JP

Not sure if this email is legit

Hello,
The following information for your Apple ID was updated on 11/jan/2014.
This changes was initiated from Egypt.
Shipping and/or billing address
If these changes were made in error, or if you believe an unauthorised person accessed your account, please reset your account information immediately by going to iupdate.apple.com because it can be used to make purchases.
we would like to inform you that if you don't reset your account, the person can benefit to make multiple orders with it, then we will be forced to block your account.
Please do not reply to this email. If you need additional help, visit our official website.
Thanks,
Apple Customer Support
when i clicked on this link (being bold) my Norton protection blocked it saying it was a fradulent website. is this correct or is my antivirus just being too picky? nobody even knows my password and why the heck is this the only so called warning when i cant even contact apple like a normal person to ask them what is up without paying a buttload extra bunch of money for one dang question. just not sure if its legit or not.

It is a phishing attempt. Do not divulge any personal or financial information. Delete the eMail.

When trying to empty trash, (securely or not), I get this: The operation can't be completed because an unexpected error occurred (error code -8003).

When trying to empty trash, (securely or not), I get this: The operation can’t be completed because an unexpected error occurred (error code -8003). FWIW, there are nearly 3000 items in my Trash - although this does not seem the source of the problem.

Have you read for possible solutions over in the "More Like This" thread over here?----------------------->

Restrict the user should not allow to select No Excise entry tab in MIGO

Hi
how to restrict the user should not allow to select No Excise entry tab in MIGO
if the material Excisable user can bale to select the No Excise entry tab in MIGO . my requirement .... if the Pop come Please enter Excise Invoice number and Excise Invoice Date user should not change the No Excise how to restrict pls advise me
@sakhi

These are the options provided by SAP keeping in mind Indian Scenario. Sometimes, vendor forget to send excise invoice copy with the material, in such case, you can select 'Only Part I'.
Even if you have maintain vendor excise details & material excise details (By mistake) in J1ID, system will throw an error message, excise invoice value is zero. In such case, we can select option 'No excise entry'.
Your requirement can't be fulfilled in standard way. Even if you go for any Z- developement, you will lose the option.

User should not be getting this email

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for