UserEventAgent 100% CPU Usage after update to 10.6.2

After a software update to my new Macbook pro, it is unusable with cpu usage pegged at 99.5% in the activity monitor. This goes down when I disconnect my Kinesis USB keyboard from the mac. Before the update, everything was fine.
What's the way around this problem? I have an ergonomic keyboard.
Processes: 47 total, 3 running, 44 sleeping, 193 threads 12:17:15
Load Avg: 1.00, 0.75, 0.39 CPU usage: 1.46% user, 51.70% sys, 46.82% idle
SharedLibs: 9128K resident, 8192K data, 0B linkedit.
MemRegions: 5453 total, 252M resident, 13M private, 145M shared.
PhysMem: 783M wired, 384M active, 176M inactive, 1342M used, 2753M free.
VM: 110G vsize, 1041M framework vsize, 40023(0) pageins, 0(0) pageouts.
Networks: packets: 25511/5152K in, 4726/1598K out.
Disks: 20435/824M read, 7482/171M written.
PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #WQ #POR #MRE RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE VPRVT
376 top 2.6 00:00.32 1/1 0 24 33 1076K 244K 1652K 17M
373 bash 0.0 00:00.00 1 0 17 24 364K 244K 1036K 17M
372 login 0.0 00:00.01 1 0 22 53 460K 244K 1568K 18M
370 ssh-agent 0.0 00:00.03 2 1 33 56 1080K 368K 2400K 39M
364 Terminal 1.8 00:02.13 5 1 112- 159 7656K 27M 19M 30M
135 AppleSpell 0.0 00:00.26 2 1 35 54 3248K 14M 6676K 29M
131 Safari 0.0 00:23.37 9 2 149 486 61M 31M 96M 213M
127 System Profi 0.0 00:00.34 2 1 96 105 4124K 22M 9460K 32M
125 mdworker 0.0 00:00.52 3 1 50 73 4432K 12M 12M 37M
124 activitymoni 0.0 00:05.08 1 0 23 37 596K 244K 1120K 28M
121 Activity Mon 0.0 00:06.66 2 1 112 271 4928K+ 37M- 18M 25M-
104- My Day 0.2 00:03.23 7 2 135 252 12M 22M 22M 47M
103- Microsoft Da 0.0 00:00.48 3 1 78 169 3064K 18M 8964K 32M
100 AirPort Base 0.0 00:00.01 3 1 32 50 672K 244K 1640K 30M
94 UserEventAge 99.9 06:01.31 3/1 1 174 104 2456K 2412K 5784K 41M
90 fontd 0.0 00:00.31 2 1 81 113 3220K 728K 4316K 30M
8

I now have 10.6.3 and the problem has become worse. I found a similar thread where multiple people had a problem with the kinesis usb keyboard:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1197549&start=0&tstart=0
Will try removing the AppleHIDMouseAgent plugin.

Similar Messages

100% CPU usage after starting/joining a call

This problem has been persisting for a few months now, and I haven't found a fix. Sometimes when I would start or join a call, the first thread of my i7 would shoot up to 100% usage (Monitored with MSI Afterburner). I originally thought it was because I had an older version of Skype, but I updated to the latest version and still had the issue. To get the usage to go down, I either have to restart the laptop or put it into sleep mode. When I checked the task manager, Skype was only using 0%-2% of my CPU, but System and System Interrupts run at higher usage (6%-7% each). I am running Windows 8.1 on a laptop with the desktop version of Skype. Please note that this also does not happen every time, just on some occasions.
EDIT: It eventually happens, but not always right away.

Yes, you can use NI-DAQmx with Visual C++ and with Mesurement Studio 7 or later you also have Microsoft Visual C++ class libraries for NI-DAQmx.
If you are now developing a application I would advice to move to DAQmx since this the Traditional libraries are nolonger activly developed, we will only be adding new features and hardware to NI-DAQmx, thus for future support of the application it's better to use NI-DAQmx then Traditional NI-DAQ.
For more information on NI-DAQmx see:
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/conceptd.nsf/webmain/ee47b125bb9e053686256fbc0014c384?OpenDocument
Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,
Karsten
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

100% CPU usage after games are run

Hi All
Having a Strange problem with iTunes. All works fine unless I play a Steam based game e.g. Counterstrike:source. If I try and launch iTunes after closing a steam game sometimes (but not always) itunes.exe will launch, there is some HD activity, nothing else happens. If I check taskmanager itunes.exe is using 100% of the CPU.
I have tried quitting and closing all possible tasks but iTunes will always launch in the same manner. A log out will not fix it, the only way to get iTunes to work again it restarting the machine.
I have had this problem since the first windows release of itunes. Is it an issue within steam? Is anyone else getting this happen?
Thanks
Dan

Tell the scanning software not to scan the entire iTunes folder. iTunes makes temp XML files every time you play a song. It does this to keep track of times & last date played.
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=165247&tstart=0
Or open up a ticket with the antivirus vendor.

Extreme CPU usage after update to Lion

Hi, I have been lurking on the forum for the past few days trying to find any threads with a similiar issue but have so far been unsuccessful. I recently upgraded the RAM in my macbook (2008 4,1) and was finally able to upgrade from Snow Leopard to Lion. I had been using Lr 4.3 on snow leopard for months without any problems so I was excited to be able to upgrade to Lr 5.3 with Lion. The problem has been when I open Lr it pegs my CPU to above 100% for an extended period.
I know sometimes when rendering previews this can happen but I've never had my CPU hit 185% for such a long time previously. The CPU eventually settles down but as soon as I start editing a photo and moving sliders it fly's back up above 100% until I stop. (this never happened before unless I was doing extensive editing / plug ins)
I thought maybe Lr5 was too much for my system so I reopened Lr 4 which had worked flawlessly in the past and now it too pegs the CPU to max as soon as I do anything. The weird thing is LR is running smoothly and things are going fine but its making my fan sound like the computer is going to blast off into space and Im worried about the heat on my cpu. All other programs have worked fine since update, including Photoshop. I read somewhere it could be plugins but I was unable to find any that seem to be in a runaway mode. I did sample the memory using activity monitor and it mentioned something about generating previews when the fan was super loud but I'm really not sure why this would suddenly be an issue when it never was in snow leopard. I did notice the preview file for my old catalog (identical to the new one as I havent really dont anything yet) is 90 mb, while the preview of the new catalog is over 1 GB.
Does anyone have any ideas? I appreciate it!
Macbook (2008, 4,1)
Mac OSX 10.7.5
2.1 Ghz core 2 Duo
Intel GMA X3100 144 MB
4 GB 667 Mhz DDR SDRAM
Internal HD- 120 GB
External HD -1 TB

I now have 10.6.3 and the problem has become worse. I found a similar thread where multiple people had a problem with the kinesis usb keyboard:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1197549&start=0&tstart=0
Will try removing the AppleHIDMouseAgent plugin.

Distiller 8 and 9 both locking up, 100 % CPU usage

Not sure if its related, but probably, since it happened right after...I just transferred everything from my quad core mac pro to my new 8-core Mac Pro. Everything went well, but now Distiller 8 starts and then sits and gives the beachball of death, and one of the cores shows 100% cpu usage. (I have that utility that shows memory used, CPU usage, etc.). I hadn't bought Acrobat 9 yet so I downloaded it and installed, and Distiller 9 does the EXACT same thing. The ONLY thing I can call an "error message" is that I can see in the window after it launches is "Error in /Library/Application Support/Adobe PDF/Settings/PDFX4 2007.joboptions:/CheckCompliance out of Range."
That message may have been there whole time, even when it worked, though. I don't know. At any rate, I need distiller working! Any ideas?

Glad to hear all is well. Preference files can cause big problems. Eons
ago, in the 1980s, I used a communications program called Red Ryder. I
loved the program. After it was updated to a new version (it might have
been called White Knight by that time), I started to have terrible
problems. I wrote to their technical support. They couldn't duplicate
the problem. It couldn't happen etc. I eventually got a little hot under
the collar. After all, if I couldn't use my modem, I couldn't check my
email, etc. It turned out to be a problem with my preference file when
converted to the latest version, that was causing the problem. Since
they always started with a new preference file, they couldn't duplicate
the problem that was obvious to me.
...Mike

Recently FireFox often has been causing 100% CPU usage and locks up until it finishes the process (various ones). Clearing cookies/cache didn't help. Any ideas?

Windows 2000 SP4, 1g RAM, Firefox 9.0.1
We keep IE6 and Firefox open simultaneously for 2 different mail accounts. Firefox was always much faster even with 3 or 4 tabs open, but for the past couple of weeks when trying to update a screen the CPU suddenly goes to 100% usage and of course nothing will move until the particular process is finished. Closing one or more tabs does not help. If I close Firefox completely with Task Manager CPU usage goes back down to nil. After restarting Firefox CPU usage may or may not go back up depending upon whether it tries to continue the previous task that was locking it up.
It did not do this with Firefox 3.6 but then again it didn't happen immediately after updating to 9.0.1 either.

100% CPU usage occurred most often toward the end of the working day when busy trying to print on-line postage. We don't have any memory-consuming plugins but according to the knowledge base articles Firefox memory usage can gradually increase during the day even if you do nothing. It seems that may be the problem so we close and restart Firefox more often now as that usually fixes the problem. However, if we get stuck on a particular website update that causes the CPU to to go 100%, we can always start Firefox without previous tabs so the update will stop, or simply use a different browser until we have time to let the computer play games with itself.
So our workaround of restarting Firefox turns out to be the final solution (until we find something better - will post it if we do). Vic

Queue consumer stops with 100% cpu usage

I'm trying to use Berkeley DB queue with transactions. When I tested what happens when transactions with DB_APPEND are aborted I found that while it works and DB_CONSUME correctly skips over rolled back records, unfortunately extents that have those records are never deleted, which causes database to always grow. Next I tried DB_CONSUME with database opened using DB_INORDER flag and it seems there's a serious regression in Berkeley DB that causes it to loop indefinitely with 100% cpu usage when it encounters a rolled back record. I tested various versions and found that this bug doesn't happen with 5.1.29, but it is reproducible with 5.2.42, so this regression might have been introduced in 5.2. I have also tested 5.3 and 6.0, and both have this behavior. There may be something wrong with the way queue records are rolled back, one indication of that would be that in 5.1.29 doesn't have neither of the two problems I found with DB_QUEUE: extents are deleted after being consumed, and there are no issues when consuming with DB_INORDER either.
You can find Python code to reproduce this issue here:
https://gist.github.com/snaury/027a3c546f5b0a62a440
Sorry for using Python and not e.g. C++, but it's a lot shorter that way.

We have looked at the issues and they are valid. We will roll the fixes out for this in our next release of BDB. The test case was very useful and really helped to speed the process up. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at [email protected] Thanks again for bringing this to our attention.
thanks
mike

High CPU usage after closing a program.

Okay, this is annoying. Doesn't happen on all programs, but too many.
When I close an application, in normal way, alt+f4/press x/file->quit the program quits, BUT, "ghost" application starts, which raises to 100% CPU usage. Then I have to close it via sigterm/sigkill. This has happened (atleast) with mplayer, nvidia-settings (which doesn't even start, but cpu usage raises to 100% anyway, and ghost application starts) and WoW thru Wine. Now, I have absolutely no idea what is going on, and I've found nothing on google.
I think it became after I upgraded to 2.6.29 kernel, it's 2.6.30 now and still the same.
A little help please

The nvidia-settings starts, as it shows on system monitor (htop, etc) but I am not getting the window, and cpu usage raises to 100% instantly. Terminal output:
dfizzle@ohai ~$ nvidia-settings
The valid values for 'XVideoTextureContrast' are in the range -1000 - 1000
(inclusive).
'XVideoTextureContrast' can use the following target types: X Screen.
The valid values for 'XVideoTextureSaturation' are in the range -1000 -
1000 (inclusive).
'XVideoTextureSaturation' can use the following target types: X Screen.

100% CPU usage with XP Cooler from PCAlert4

Any idea why I would be running 100% cpu usage when running XP Cooler from PCAlert4? I noticed PC was sluggish when running it so CTRL+ALT+DEL and under performance is 100% CPU with 245MB Ram Usage. No other TSR's running - several application but under 10% CPU usage without PCAlert and XP Cooler.
I was also wondering if anyone had any ideas on the video? I have the K7N2G with 768MB DDR PC 2100 (3x256) XP2200+ 266FSB running 1804MHz - Maxtor 30GB 7200RPM - 350W PSU (raidmax - yea yea I know, dont say a word though LOL) on board video and here is the problem - graphics are great, but they get choppy - running NFS HotPursuit 2 at 32bit 800x600 (doesnt seem to matter even when running 16bit 640x480still does it.) what setting am I missing? Thanks in advance.

Deathstalker (Richard),
I did what you suggest in memory management and also changed out the mem on the board - it did make a difference, not as much as I had hoped, but it did.
Raven,
I have used Fraps in the past, forgot about it, but went ahead and downloaded it to get a better look.
To the Both of you,
Thanks so much for your replies, sometimes it just takes someone outside looking in to see the things overlooked. But I went ahead and also ran all of the latest updates for the board (semi new system and I only installed with the CD that came with the Mobo) and everything is running better than expected. Thanks again for your thoughts - keep 'em flowin, it's amazing whom we could help. Take care.
Don

[10.1.2] Protected Mode causing 100% CPU Usage/Extra Processes on Win XP 32-bit?

Hello,
I'm not 100% sure if the two are related, but I have a client who was seeing 100% CPU usage using Adobe Acrobat Reader X 10.1.2 on Windows XP 32-bit and Firefox 11. The acrord32.exe process would hang around after closing the main window and eventually leading to tons of processes and his CPU at 100% use. I believe disabling Protected Mode may have solved this issue. I didn't see it documented anywhere so I figure I'd post about it here and see if anyone else was seeing this resolved as well.

I noticed 'only' 50 % CPU usage. Not during Reader usage with ~ 20 %, but it started after closing main window.
Two instances of acrord32.exe were created - the moment pdf was opened - of which one was using zero CPU.
After opening another pdf, 2 more processes were created, so 4 in total. Have seen 2 of them using 100 %.
Issue is easily recreated.
This is all in 10.1.3, no fix from Adobe, only THE fix from you: turning of Protected Mode!
After which now only one proces is created, with 1 to 3 pdf documents opened at same time.
This instance is then nicely shutdown after the last pfd is closed.

Shockwave Flash 11.6.602.168 100% CPU usage

Hi,
Our computer has 100% CPU usage every time we get in websites that utilize Flash, or watch youtube.
Browser: FF 19.0
Flash 11.6.602.168
Computer: HP Pentium 4, 2.8 GHz, 3G memory, up-to-date BIOS and other drivers.
Graphic card: EVGA GeFprce 6200
Windows 7 32 bits
This window is freshly installed, has AVG on. We do not have many software's installed, except MS Office. All fans and CPU are clean. The computer runs fairly fast: we tried opening multiple FF tabs simultaneously, plus Excel, Word, Solitaire etc. without any problems. However, whenever we get into websites with Flash, the CPU uasage goes to 100% and stays there. Memory usage has always been stable, around 30%. We have tried the following steps, but it hasn't gotten better:
- Turned off all applications, opened only one tab with that website.
- Updated all drivers and applications: FF, Flash, Graphic card etc.
- Turned ON and OFF hardware acceleration for both Flash and FF, also tried to turn one On, the other OFF, and vise versa.
- Disabled all add-on's, extensions and Plug-in's, except Flash.
- Uninstalled and reinstall FF and Flash; restarted several times.
- Temporarily turned OFF protected mode.
- Uninstalled FF, Flash, then installed IE 9, then Flash for IE: didn't work.
- Uninstalled IE 9, Flash, then installed IE10 then reinstalled Flash for IE: also didn't work.
- We do not keep browsing history.
Examples of websites that we have had problems with: pbskids.org, barbie.com, and other school websites for kids to do homework or watch youtube.
While in many websites such as CNN.com, yahoo.com, when we opened it, the CPU usage did spike, but came back to 1-5% within 5 seconds.
This computer is for our kids. Do we really need to buy an i5 or i7 computer so the kids can play and do homework? Or is there any other way that we can do?
Thank you

Moving to the Using Flash Player forum, as this isn't specific to the Beta.
In the Youtube video, if you right-click and choose Show Video Info, it will show you whether you're using Hardware Acceleration for both Video Rendering and Video Decoding.
If you're seeing Software Rendering and/or Software Decoding and you're watching a high-def video, it's going to use a ton of CPU.
Do you see similar behavior in other browsers? (Chrome, IE) The Flash Player distributions are actually quite different for each browser. It would be an interesting data point.

K7N420 100% cpu usage

Apologies in advance for a long post but I'm stretched beyond my technical abilities to solve this thing. I was running a virus scan a week ago (no issues, it had just been a long time since I ran one) and while I was away the machine restarted itself when it shouldn't have. It was waiting at the redhat login (dual boot XP and redhat) when it should have been waiting to tell me the scan was done in XP. It never booted properly again. The HD reported fatal unrecoverable errors. I bit the bullet and replaced the drive with a Maxtor 80G 7200rpm drive and loaded XP Pro with no issues. Loaded Norton, updated it twice and proceeded for Windows updates. No issues, device manager has no conflicts. HOWEVER, the machine is running no apps (they aren't even installed!) and taskmanager reports 100% cpu usage and no processes running except system idle which jumps from 97 to 99% repeatedly. Somehow I managed to revive the original drive (wrote zeroes to it and ran scandisk several times and it reports no errors now) and tried it with the same problem. I've gone so far as to install 98se (yuck) on the original WD drive and it is using about 28% cpu, again with virtually nothing installed. I ran stinger off a floppy as well as Norton several times so the drives and MBR would appear to be clean. The RAM is appearing properly on both OS's and always no applications running and no processes showing as using anything. I'm stumped.
Any advice is welcome.

GlennVidia, first thanks for helping this dumbass out. I ran the memtest overnight with no issues. I just reinstalled XP on the new Maxtor drive. I am using the 2.03 drivers. I just installed PCAlert and it shows the following voltages: Vcore: 1.74, 3.3 is at 3.34, 5 is at 5.03 and 12 is at 12.18 with a cpu temp of 118F. I have installed no other apps including anti-virus. The cpu usage is bouncing between 44% and 65% cycling every second...you can set a clock to it. (Hopefully that triggers someone's memory?) No processes showing as using resources in task manager besides system idle and an occasional hit for task manager itself. Device manager has no issues. I changed the ide cable and reseated all cables to and from the mobo.
You mention usb...I'm not using any usb devices but will gladly kill it in DM if that is what you are suggesting for a test run.

100% CPU Usage caused by HMI

Hi everybody:
I'm working with LabVIEW DSC 8.2.1 in a system that monitors many variables of a plant, such a typical SCADA system. For this reason, the use of the graphic tools is highly used on the development of this system. Everything works fine, but I have only one problem.... the usage of the CPU.
When I am working on the development system I (not the executable) I start the application and after the variables are initialized and every process has started and are running , the CPU usage is raised around 90 - 100%. After a few days investigating the reason of this, I realized thay when I change the view on the screen to another view, for example the block diagram of the application, while the application is still running, the CPU usage goes around 15 - 25%. I've tried these many times changing the view from Front panel to Block Diagram and viceversa and the result is always the same: Front Panel= around 100%; Block diagram or another view (other applications MMIs, or Block Diagrams, etc.)= around 20%.
Another thing that I realized is that the other view (different to front panel) has to fill the entire screen to work the way I'm telling before.
When I build and run the executable, the usage of the CPU is the same... (around 100%), but I can't see any other application, because the application built is the shell of the OS, so no other views are available.
I don't know if there's some other consideration to take into account about the HMI when creating an application, and I'll appreciate very much your help.
Thanks in advance!
Ignacio von Unger

From http://100cpuusage.blogspot.com/
100 Percent CPU Usage when you run programs after you install Windows XP Service Pack 2
CPU Usage 100% Symptoms
When you run some programs, the CPU Usage meter in Task Manager may indicate CPU Usage 100%. When CPU utilization reaches 100 percent, programs will run very slowly or stop responding (hang) and your computer is freezing or crashing.
Noteress CTRL+ALT+DEL to view CPU utilization, click Task Manager, and then click the Performance tab.
These symptoms occur after you install Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2).
CPU Usage 100% Cause
These problem occurs because of the user interface code that is included in Windows XP SP2. The high CPU utilization is caused by the additional overhead that occurs when the IsWindow function is called by the user interface code.
RESOLUTION
Hotfix information
A supported hotfix is now available from Microsoft. However, this hotfix is intended to correct only the problem that is described in this article. Apply this hotfix only to systems that are experiencing this specific problem. This hotfix might receive additional testing. Therefore, if you are not severely affected by this problem, we recommend that you wait for the next service pack that contains this hotfix.
To resolve this problem, submit a request to Microsoft Online Customer Services to obtain the hotfix. To submit an online request to obtain the hotfix, visit the following Microsoft Web site:
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=6294451
Note If additional issues occur or any troubleshooting is required, you might have to create a separate service request. The usual support costs will apply to additional support questions and issues that do not qualify for this specific hotfix. To create a separate service request, visit the following Microsoft Web site:
http://support.microsoft.com/contactus/?ws=support (http://support.microsoft.com/contactus/?ws=support)
Prerequisites
To apply this hotfix, you must have Windows XP SP2 installed.
Restart requirement
You must restart the computer after you apply this hotfix.
Hotfix replacement information
This hotfix does not replace any other hotfixes.
File information
The English version of this hotfix has the file attributes (or later file attributes) that are listed in the following table. The dates and times for these files are listed in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). When you view the file information, it is converted to local time. To find the difference between UTC and local time, use the Time Zone tab in the Date and Time item in Control Panel. Date Time Version Size File name
30-Mar-2005 19:53 5.1.2600.2643 577,024 User32.dll
30-Mar-2005 01:30 5.1.2600.2643 1,836,544 Win32k.sys
if you still do not know how to Fix CPU Usage 100%?
I suggest you try targeted software - registry cleaner to fix cpu usage 100%
Because there are many cases causing high cpu utilization.
1. If you do a lot of web surfing and are concerned about spyware, adware infecting your machine, they will cause system crashes and CPU utilization reaches 100 percent. Some good registry cleaner has the function of spyware & adware removal.
2. You install many beta version of the software, Drivers are not certified, which resulted in many errors, you get high cpu usage.
3.100% CPU Usage while you use Internet Explorer
4. many unneed Startup Program.
5.Others PC Errors. - DLL errors, runtime errors, Windows-Installer Errors, Windows Startup Errors,paths Broken DLLs, OCX, and ActiveX Components all will cause 100% cpu usage. Your PC will run very slowly.
Registry cleaner can do a complete scan of your entire file system and registry in under 2 minutes! Fix High Cpu Usage. Improve PC Speed By Up to 70%!
http://www.100-cpu-usage.com/ suggest you to download registry cleaner to fix 100% cpu usage too.
PCErrorsfixer.com - Top 3 Windows Registry Cleaners, Improve PC Performance,5 Star Rated. Fix 100% CPU Usage, Runtime Error, DLL Error,Windows Startup Errors,Internet Explorer Errors, Speed Up your slow PC.

Microsoft.Exchange.AddressBook.Service.exe 100% CPU Usage

Hi,
We have an exchange server 2010 and the Microsoft.Exchange.AddressBook.Service.exe used 100% CPU Usage suddenly. However, after rebooting the server, the CPU Usage of the above .exe is back to normal. Client cannot connect to the exchange server during
the high CPU Usage of the above .exe.
Any ideas for the above problems? Thank You.

Hi
Microsoft.Exchange.AddressBook.Service.exe is related to OAB function.
Maybe mobile or client fails to download will cause this problem.
What was the fix for this?

Crystalras.exe consuming 100% CPU usage

Hi everyone,
When we try to open an instance of one of our Crystal reports from InfoView, the crystalras.exe process runs at 100% CPU usage and the report never shows up. After a few minutes, we get the following message:
The request timed out because there has been no reply from the server for 600,000 milliseconds.
Does anyone know where the problem could come from? Could this be because the report is retrieving too much data?
Thanks in advance for any help.

Dear Both,
I traced the RAS server as suggested by Tim and obtained a log that - I have to admit - is quite difficult for me to understand. Could I send it to one of you for examination? Thanks in advance.
Ted, please find below my answers to your questions:
Just to close out possible data source issues, are the reports going against Business Views or Universes?
The report is based on Business Views.
Do you have Processing Extensions specified for the reports?
Sorry but what are Processing Extensions?
Also, when you checked in the Crystal Reports Designer, was it Designer installed on the same machine where the page server and RAS server is running?
Yes, it is installed on the same machine.
Also, since it affects both Page Server and RAS, it may require CRPE traces to get to the bottom of this (CRPE - 'creepy' - is the CR engine used by both the Page and RAS server).
I will certainly open a case with SAP to have them help me on that.
Thank you both for your help. It is very appreciated.

UserEventAgent 100% CPU Usage after update to 10.6.2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for