Using a different os version...

hi
i have a game on disc that won't work on 10.5, the developers say it's something to do with the drivers, i should have no problem with 10.3 or 10.4......is it as easy as downloading one of these versions and sticking it on the desktop, then opening it when i want to load the game...wanted to check before i tried....

hmmm... no i don't know if tiger will work on my machine but if i'm using leopard i assume it would be able to cope?
my imac is second hand, the one with the swivel neck, and the seller installed leopard onto it, 10.5.6, when i bought it....i was there at the time...don't know what was previously on it...
the game is redline by ambrosia....its a car racing game...web page says it needs 10.3.9 to run....on contacting them it seemed pretty clear they weren't going to update the drivers...don't know why....the game is still for sale...i might ask them again...

Similar Messages

Cloning use the different gcc version between source system and target sys

Hi All,
Our system is: Application tier and Database tier is split to two servers.
We should run a cloning, but I found the different gcc version on application tier on source system and target system.
The source application tier server is RedHat Linux ES3, gcc version is 3.2.3
The target application tier server is RedHat Linux ES3, gcc version is 2.9.6
There is the same gcc version on database tier on source system and target system, they are gcc 2.9.6.
My question: Can I use the different gcc version between source system and target system when I run an erp cloning?
Thanks & Regards
Owen

Not necessarily, you might get some errors if the version is higher and it is not supported by the OS. An example is Note: 392311.1 - usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.5/libgcc_s.so: undefined reference to 'dl_iterate_phdr@GLIBC_2.2.4'
To be on the safe side, make sure you have the same version (unless you want to give it a try).

Use of different production versions for MRP and costing

Dear PP Gurus ,
We have a scenario in which there are multiple production versions for a particular product .The MRP run as welll as costing run considers only the production version 0001.
We would like the system to consider different production versions for MRP and costing ..that is 0001 for MRP and 0005 for costing .
Is this possible ... if yes ...Kindly suggest the config and master settings for this to happen .
Ram ~

Dear Ramakrishna,
For doing the costing for a specific production version use CK11N,under quantity structure tab key you
can assign the prod.version which is to be used for costing purpose.
While taking MRP if you want to consider the particular Prod.version,assign the demand to the
correct prod.version under schedule line tab in MD61.
Otherwise the system always picksup the first prod.version for MRP.
One more alternative is you have to lock the other prod.versions if you want the system to consider a
particular prod.version.
Check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Using a different Plan Version in WIP calculation

Hi experts.
I am using version 97 as plan in a wip calculation. The problem is that to recognize plan incomings my system uses version 0 and in the result analysis they always appear as 0 because the version the system is taking to recover the planned incomings is 97 and it is empty.
Is there any standard way to make it take version 97 only for costs?.
Thanks.
Alex

yes. this is true, the predicates are not preserved, I found that out after posting. ok, Im really thinking bug here, I'll explain further.
Im outside of prod time so can run the mview. the plan is pretty big so not going to post just yet, its just behavioural at this stage.
explain for QUERY, = plan good.
create table t1 as QUERY = plan good.
insert to table as QUERY = plan good
create mview as QUERY = plan bad. Not just timings are bad, the plan has completely changed. I stop the mview creation at this stage. good old ctrl+c.
the only thing thats different is Im running MVIEW create. So I hit my ADDM again, can see the bad plan and bad timings. So I get the SQL_ID from the ADDM for the bad plan and run a 10053 on it using the 11.2 sqldiag dump. Im hoping to see why its choosing the bad path
execute DBMS_SQLDIAG.DUMP_TRACE(p_sql_id=>'576wpd5g73q9c', p_child_number=>0, p_component=>'Compiler', p_file_id=>'BAD1');
edit my BAD1 10053 trace file and I see...the plan is GOOD. Its estimated 2 seconds to run for the SQL_ID thats actually bad when running.
This is why Im thinking bug.

HHActiveX.dll is being overwritten by a different, earlier version...

Here's an interesting problem:
On some systems on which my .chm file for a local help system is installed, HHActiveX.dll (the 32-bit one supplied with RH9 for redistribution) is being overwritten using a different, earlier version. It is not yet clear when the overwrite occurs, but it is being looked into.
Has anyone seen this before? I don't see how it's possible that it's a problem with the .dll or the .chm, so I suspect something is awry in Windows (XP, SP3 in this case).
Thanks in advance!

Hi Burtin
I might imagine that could occur if someone installed another application that uses RoboHelp created CHM files and requires the dll.
Has that by chance been the case here?
Another possibility would be if for some reason a system restore point has been set and reverted back to.
Just some thoguhts from the edge... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7, 8 or 9 within the day!
Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
SorcerStone Blog
RoboHelp eBooks

How to use two different versions of Firefox at the same time on Snow Leopard?

I recently upgraded to Firefox 4.0 on my 27" iMac running Snow Leopard 10.6.7.
Previously, I was using Google's "Page Speed" along with Firebug in Firefox 3.6.15 to optimize images in my web pages, and to find other areas to optimize.
Page Speed is not yet compatible with Firefox 4.0. I wrote to Google about this some time ago -- no answer yet.
If I run Firefox 3.6.15 in order to use Page Speed, I run into a few problems afterward when I start using Firefox 4.0 again, since they both use the same "Firefox" folder in my "Application Support" folder.
How can I set it up so that I can have two separate "Firefox" folders in my "Application Support" folder?
Or is there an easier way to use two different versions of Firefox simultaneously, even if one has extensions and/or plug-ins installed which are not compatible with the other version?
Thanks for a great browser!

Please disregard my question. I just conducted more web search and learned how to use Firefox's profile manager in order to make a separate profile for Firefox 3.6.15.
You can find instructions on this page:
http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Managing%20profiles#os=mac&browser=fx35
'''A small tip:'''
If your Firefox app is named anything other than "Firefox" -- say for example "Firefox 3.6.15" -- when you follow the instructions at the above link, make sure you escape the blank space that is before the version number by adding a backward slash before it, when you type the command string in the Terminal. In other words, in that string, you should use this:
Firefox\ 3.6.15
I hope that helps someone.
WW

SLI - Can I use two different video card versions for SLI?

Hello,
Can I use two different generations of MSI video cards that implement the same GPU for SLI?
The two video cards are:
MSI N260GTX-T2D896-OCv2 GeForce GTX 260 896MB <-- What I currently have
MSI N260GTX-T2D896-OCv3 GeForce GTX 260 896MB
MSI N260GTX-T2D896-OCv4 GeForce GTX 260 896MB
The main difference between these three seems to be that the OCv3 has two fans and a different heatsink than the OCv2. The OCv4 has one fan like the OCv2 and but it is located in a different location and some weird spikey heatsink thing going on. I already have the OCv2 but I am looking to get another card for SLI and newegg doesn't sell the OCv2 anymore. The important thing is that I am looking for is stability and it seems that the most ideal setup would be to get identical cards.
By the way, why are there so many versions (updates?) to this card? Have there been issues related to the card that necessitate a revision?
Thanks

Different coolers(HS and fans) and possibly different makers of vRAM. But, you should be able to run SLI without issues regardless of the versions.

I am now using a different MacBook Pro, and want to install my CC, I have done that and downloaded the Photoshop App but its a trial version. How do I get the full version of the apps?

I had a new MacBook Pro that was damaged and I am now using a different MacBook pro as my primary computer (running yosemite 10.10.1).
I did uninstall the Creative Cloud off the old MacBook before I stopped using it.
I have downloaded the Creative Cloud and signed in using my adobe username and password, but when I went to download the Photoshop App it is only giving me the TRIAL VERSION.
How do I make sure that the apps are the full version that I have already paid for? (I do know that my subscription is still current)
Thanks for your help
- Shawn

Shawn I would recommend utilizing the steps in Sign in, activation, or connection errors | CC, CS6, CS5.5 - http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/activation-network-issues.html to resolve the connection error which is likely preventing the software from authenticating.

Use different JRE versions in Oracle Discoverer 10g(10.1.2.0)

Hello.
We have a Oracle Forms application which also uses Discoverer Plus and Reports.
Problem is we have some user clients who uses XP/IE 6.0 while otheres has Vista IE 8.0.
Based on here
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/ias/downloads/as-certification-r2-101202-095871.html#BABGCBHA
depending on OS/browser different plugin versions are required. If we
Can we have different JRE versions in separate clients? Kinda confused with the matrix.

Hi;
Please check below which could be helpful for your issue:
Overview of Using Java with Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12 [ID 418664.1]
Deploying Sun JRE (Native Plug-in) for Windows Clients in Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12 [ID 393931.1]
Oracle Jinitiator and Sun JRE/JPI Support for Oracle Forms Applications [ID 555720.1]
Regard
Helios

How to run 2 different Firefox versions using the same profile

Is it possible to run 2 different Firefox versions using the same profile and still have browsing history saved? I used to be able to do that up until a week ago. What happened was I was using Firefox version 3.6.28(a very old version of Firefox) which I need to use sometimes and then the current version, 36.01. Earlier I would use both my versions of Firefox and the history would be saved if I used both versions but now when version 36.01 came out, its not saving for some reason. Is this a bug? The history is saving during the current session, but say I close out of Firefox and then go back to Firefox, it will still be saved but when I go to my old version of Firefox, the history is saved but then after I close out of that the history on my new current version is all gone and it starts me all fresh, is there a way to get rid of this so that the history will always be saved even if i switch between versions? I could do that before up until Firefox 35.01 but Firefox 36 isnt saving the history from the old version, is this a bug or not? Now I have to create a separate profile for each Firefox so the history I use on the old version is only saved on that version and the history I have on the new Firefox is another profile so that history from the 2nd profile remains but I dont want that. I want to be able to use the same profile so that the same browsing history can be saved using both versions like it was before, I hope people can understand my problem. If not I can further explain, thanks.

@ the-edmeister, I understand that the 2 versions are completely different, however how come the history was saving fine when I switched between firefox 3.6.28 to the current one which was Firefox 32, 33, 34, 35 etc? Like I'm surprised how come now at Firefox 36 this problem started, Firefox 36 isnt that much different from Firefox 35 but yet Firefox 35 was still saving my browser history from the old 3.6.28 version, my 3.6.28 version never upgrades but the new Firefox keeps upgrading whenever there is a new release out automatically and then all of a sudden when the new version of 36.01 came out all my history was gone, so isnt Firefox 35.01 also very much different from 3.6.28 as much as 36.01 is? I hope you got what I meant, thank you for helping.

Use different java versions to start weblogic and run application.

Hi All,
I'm currently using weblogic707 which need java 1.4.1 to start up. However, i have this application that run only on java version 1.3.1. Is there any possibility to configure the weblogic to run my application on different java version?
Thanks.
wls

Hi HMLunger,
Did you install the SQL Server instance successfully? If not, please help to post the summary and detail logs for analysis. By default, the logs can be found in: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Setup Bootstrap\Log.
However, if you fail to start SQL Server Express service after successfully installing SQL Server,
you might have to change the paths of the files by running the following scripts from the command prompt. For more details, please review this similar
thread.
NET START MSSQL$SQLEXPRESS /f /T3608
SQLCMD -S .\SQLEXPRESS
ALTER DATABASE model MODIFY FILE (NAME = logical_name , FILENAME = 'new_path\os_file_name');
ALTER DATABASE model MODIFY FILE (NAME = logical_name , FILENAME = 'new_path\os_file_name');
go
exit;
ALTER DATABASE msdb MODIFY FILE (NAME = logical_name , FILENAME = 'new_path\os_file_name');
ALTER DATABASE msdb MODIFY FILE (NAME = logical_name , FILENAME = 'new_path\os_file_name');
NET STOP MSSQL$SQLEXPRESS
In addition, you can follow the steps in this KB article to uninstall SQL Server.
Thanks,
Lydia Zhang
Lydia Zhang
TechNet Community Support

Warning a client is using a different version of the ormi protocol 1.3 != 1

Hi All,
I am trying to access a bpel process deployed on 10.1.2.0.2 bpel process manager via java client. I am getting the below error on the bpel process manager as,
Warning a client is using a different version of the ormi protocol 1.3 != 1.1
I am using the following jars at client side,
ejb.jar
oc4jclient.jar
oc4j-internal.jar
optic.jar
orabpel.jar
orabpel-common.jar
xmlparserv2.jar
Can you please help me to solve this issue.
Appreciate your help!.
Thanks,
Levey

I believe there is a patch available, which allows cross version ORMI compatibility, which needs to be applied to the 10.1.2 release:
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B25221_04/web.1013/b14427/rmi.htm#JISVC6301
-steve-

If I buy an I Pad 2 AT&T version 3G and I want to use it outside of USA using a different carrier SIM card is it going to work internationally.

If I buy an I Pad 2 AT&T version 3G and I want to use it outside of USA using a different carrier SIM card is it going to work internationally.

Yes
Provide you can buy pre-payed GSM micr-sim cards in the domain to which you are travelling.
IF you can't then your either going to pay ATT huge amounts for international roaming or will have to find a free/low cost or public open WiFi hotspot.

Hotsync two different Palms that use a different version of Palm Desktop

What I need to know is I have a Palm IIIe & a Palm Zire 31 both of which use a different version of Palm Destop can a install both versions of Palm Desktop on a single computer and then be able to hotsync both devices. Or will both of them hotsync with the same version of Palm Desktop.
Palm Desktop 4.1.4e for the Palm Zire 31
Palm Desktop 4.1.4 for the Palm IIIe
Post relates to: Zire 31
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hello obsolete.
I haven't tried your specific combination of devices before, but I think it should work. I would install Palm Desktop 4.1.4 and then sync the Palm IIIe first. Once you know that the Palm IIIe is syncing normally, I would then install Palm Desktop 4.1.4e on top of 4.1.4, upgrading it. Then sync the Palm IIIe to make sure it is still working. If it is, then attempt to sync your Zire 31.
Since you will be syncing two devices to the same computer, I recommend that each device have it's own unique HotSync ID to prevent things from going bad on you.
Alan G

Synch using different OS versions

I can't get my OS10.3.9 machines to sync with my 10.4.10 machines. It is like having two accounts.
I have two 10.4.10 and four 10.3.9 machines.
Any idea if this can be overcome.

Despite the fact that you continue to use Mac OS X 10.3.9 and it's 'link' to .Mac is iSync, you are asking in the wrong forum. A forum for .Mac Sync users is located elsewhere on Apple Discussions.
On October 18, 2007, Apple sent a message to .Mac subscribers as follows:
"Dear .Mac member:
Due to improvements being made to .Mac Sync on October 19, 2007, please note the following changes.
Mac OS X version 10.4 Tiger users:
To ensure uninterrupted service, you must be using Mac OS X version 10.4.10. To check which version you’re running, select About This Mac in the Apple menu. If you are not running version 10.4.10, click the Software Update button and install the update to 10.4.10.
Mac OS X version 10.3 Panther users:
To accommodate new enhancements, .Mac Sync will no longer support syncing of calendars between a Panther-based Mac and a Mac running Tiger or Leopard. Syncing calendars between Mac computers running Panther is unaffected."
Roughly translated: you will never again be able to synchronize your Mac OS X 10.3.x platforms to those running Mac OS X 10.4.x or 10.5.x using .Mac Sync. You may continue synchronizing Mac OS X 10.3.x platforms to each other alone using iSync.

Using a different os version...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for