Using archiver pointing to a clustered UCM 11g

Hello, I have to migrate content from UCM 10g to 11g but UCM 11g is in a Weblogic cluster. All UCM nodes use the same database schema and have shared filesystem for vault and weblayout. Where do I point the transfer of the archiver? Does it matter which of them the output provider uses to define the archive collection? Any ideas or recommendations?
Thank you very much in advance!
Regards.

Hi ,
It would need to be pointed to one of the UCM servers in the cluster so that it is a single point where the input is done . Since the cluster will all read the same weblayout / vault all the other nodes will be able to show / action on the contents .
Thanks
Srinath

Similar Messages

  • Connect WebCenter 11g PS3 to a clustered UCM 11g ?

    Hi,
    I am trying to figure out how to connect a WebCenter cluster to a UCM cluster.
    I have mainly been flowing the [Enterprise Deployment Guide for Oracle WebCenter|http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14571_01/core.1111/e12037/toc.htm] but in this crucial point the manual just explains how to generally connect webcenter to a ucm server in section "9.14 Registering Oracle Content Server with Oracle WebCenter" .
    There seems to be no info in the internet on how to connect a WebCenter cluster to a UCM cluster.
    Am I the first one to try that??
    regards
    Oliver

    I have the same problem, we are using RIDC protocol, and have a UCM cluster, but use only one of the nodes..

  • Unable to create content properly in UCM 11G using validateStandard filter

    Hi All,
        We have used validateStandard filter to assign content id with 16 digits in UCM 10G and it worked well, we deployed this component in UCM 11G but it is not working properly. When we click on Check In button content is getting created and displaying  Check_In Confirmation with 16 digit Content ID, upon clicking on Content Info it is displaying the complete info page. When we try to search the content it is not displaying in search results, also when tried to export it using Archiver it is not creating batch file. When we see logs in View Server out put it is displaying
    Unable to lock content with dDocName: 6322932684534064
    File to be removed: D:/oracle/ucm/cs/oracle/ucm/cs/vault/~temp/6322932684534064_meta.htm
    Below is the code and its corresponding log after check In is performed
    trace("=====Set 16 digit random number as ContentId=====");
                 String contId = databinder.getLocal("dDocName");
                 trace("=====value of contId====="+ contId);
            if("".equals(contId))
            //trace("=====Inside ContentId generetion=====");
            int maxdigits = 16;
            StringBuilder result = new StringBuilder();
            Random r = new Random();
            for (int i = 0; i<maxdigits; i++)
            result.append(r.nextInt(10));
            databinder.putLocal("dDocName", result.toString());
            trace("=====Generated ContentId is====="+ result.toString());
    View Server O/P:
    =====Set 16 digit random number as ContentId=====
    =====value of contId=====001885
    =====Generated ContentId is=====6322932684534064
    >(internal)/6 07.08 15:09:28.273 IdcServer-968 Unable to lock content with dDocName: 6322932684534064
    >(internal)/6 07.08 15:09:29.476 IdcServer-968 File to be removed: D:/oracle/ucm/cs/oracle/ucm/cs/vault/~temp/6322932684534064_meta.htm
    Thanks,
    Ashok

    Its a bug. References BUG:16231709 - OBIA7964:ERROR WHILE CREATING DATA WAREHOUSE TABLES USING DAC 11G
    So far the workaround is to use one Container Name at a time when creating the Warehouse.
    If helps mark and update back

  • How to use RelatedContent component with UCM 11g without Records Management

    As the subject really...
    I have been playing around with UCM 11g and want to use the RelatedContent component in isolation of URM / Records management.
    Can I still do this, and is it supported.
    I have had a look at advanced component manager and also the RMFC page but if I select a custom install with only related content I get a whole bunch of RM related stuff in the interface that I do not need.
    Any suggestions? Is the old RelatedContent component supported directly on 11g?
    Thanks
    Tim
    Edited by: Tim Snell on 24-Aug-2010 08:16

    Hi,
    First this post is really helpful as I was looking around for enabling related content component in ucm11g.
    Now i am able to see it in my enabled component lists.
    However , i have one doubt. I have enabled the component and restarted the server. After that if i got the checkin page, i can see only 'wwxRelatedContentTriggerDate' metadata for the related content. My assumption was when I enable the component, i will get a metadata on the content check in page to link to the other content items.
    So can you please help me
    1) to help whether my understanding is correct?
    2) if yes, why am i not getting the metadata to specify the other contents is not shown? what I need to do for the same?
    Thanks a lot in advance
    Regards
    Poornima

  • Using UCM 11g metadata fields within IPM

    IHAC that is already running UCM 11g and would like to introduce IPM. As part of defining application within IPM is it possible to reuse already defined metadata fields from UCM?
    thanks

    Still a problem, but I just discovered I wasn't setting the attachments.storageType to UCM.  I also now set the attachment.revision to the revision number for the document seen in UCM.  Not sure it matters, but I set the attachment.attachmentScope to TASK, and I set the name and title too.
    But now I get this error on the User Activity when I create a test composite:
    <bpelFault><faultType>1</faultType><operationErroredFault xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/bpel/workflow/taskService"><part name="payload"><operationErroredFault xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/bpel/workflow/taskService"><faultInfo>oracle.stellent.ridc.protocol.ServiceException: Unable to execute service DOC_INFO and function QdocInfo. The error was caused by an internally generated issue. The error has been logged.</faultInfo></operationErroredFault></part></operationErroredFault></bpelFault>
    Clearly there is something more I must set, but I don't know what.  Any and all help would be appreciated.
    Thanks.

  • Content migration Stellent 7.5 to UCM 11g | Facing trouble

    Hi All,
    We are upgrading from Stellent 7.5 to UCM 11g. Stellent 7.5 is on windows 2003 with SQL 2005 database, and UCM 11g is on Linux RHEL 5.6 with Oracle 11g database.
    We are using archiver to migrate contents from Stellent to UCM. The import batch program is successfully executing. Below is the process we follow to migrate the contents which are in workflow.
    1- Moved folders for migrating user workflow history and states of workflows
         <stellent idc root>\data\workflow to <ucm root>\data\workflow
         <stellent idc root>\data\user\profiles to <ucm root>\data\user\profiles
    2- Migrated table data
         - truncating table data, the tables are : Revisions, DocMeta, Documents, DocumentHistory and RevClasses etc
         - Migrating data of these tables from MSSQL to Oracle so that workflow state, document checkout states are also preserved
         - wf_in_queue stores did of content therefore old did (of 7.5) needs to be preserved to show documents lying in user's queue
         - As well as there are some custom tables which are dependent on did.
    Now the problem is, the native url of the link is pointing to new did.extention which was generated while content import through archiver. And if we migrate the table data as mentioned above the native url shows the old did.xls but this file doesnot exists in the file system.
    Is there any who also faced the same situation?
    Or is there a better way of migrating contents from 7.5 to 11g.
    Thanks,
    Rajiv

    There is no supported direct migration path from 7.5 to 11g. The supported migration path is to upgrade the 7.5 instance to 10g, then upgrade the 10g instance to 11g.
    I think Tim says it best here.
    Changing the UCM Database

  • UCM 11g SystemProperties utility

    Hello,
    UCM 11g, on win xp SP3, Oracle 11g DB.
    I am installing UCM 11gR1 and after completing all the installation tasks (I was following: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17904_01/doc.1111/e14495/toc.htm), trying to configuring a JDBC Driver for standalone applications. When I am trying to open SystemProperties I get error:
    C:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\domains\base_domain\ucm\cs\bin>systemproperties
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main !$Unable to start application.(internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at intradoc.common.Defau
    ltTraceImplementor.appendStackTrace(DefaultTraceImplementor.java:318)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at intradoc.common.Defau
    ltTraceImplementor.traceDumpException(DefaultTraceImplementor.java:429)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at intradoc.common.Defau
    ltReportHandler.message(DefaultReportHandler.java:450)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at intradoc.common.Defau
    ltReportDelegator.message(DefaultReportDelegator.java:134)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at intradoc.common.Repor
    t.messageInternal(Report.java:172)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at intradoc.common.Repor
    t.message(Report.java:154)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at intradoc.common.Repor
    t.fatal(Report.java:539)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at intradoc.common.Syste
    mUtils.handleFatalException(SystemUtils.java:1010)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at SystemProperties.main
    (SystemProperties.java:78)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at sun.reflect.NativeMet
    hodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at sun.reflect.NativeMet
    hodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at sun.reflect.Delegatin
    gMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at java.lang.reflect.Met
    hod.invoke(Method.java:597)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at intradoc.loader.IdcCl
    assLoader.invokeMain(IdcClassLoader.java:337)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at intradoc.loader.IdcCl
    assLoader.startMain(IdcClassLoader.java:170)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at intradoc.loader.IdcCl
    assLoader.main(IdcClassLoader.java:140)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main Caused by: java.lang.NullPointer
    Exception
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at intradoc.server.IdcSy
    stemConfig.configLocalization(IdcSystemConfig.java:819)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at intradoc.server.utils
    .IdcUtilityLoader.initLocalizationEx(IdcUtilityLoader.java:78)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main at SystemProperties.main
    (SystemProperties.java:51)
    (internal)/1 03.17 15:00:19.812 main ... 7 more
    Unable to start application.
    Null pointer is dereferenced.
    I tried to reinstall it from scratch, but got the same problem. Thanks for help.
    Giedrius

    Try using My oracle support note (the documentation should have this I believe too):
         Setting up the Admin Applets to run in stand alone mode on an 11g install (Doc ID 1265076.1)

  • Calling UCM 11g web services with SSO

    Hello, I have read the documentation about Single Sign-On in UCM 11G but I haven't understood how I could use SSO on UCM 11g web services calls.
    The document I have read is
    [http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E15586_01/doc.1111/e10792/c03_security.htm]
    and I only see info about SSO when using "Windows Native Authentication" (WNA).
    I have to send soap calls from applications deployed in other application servers and use the SSO mechanism.
    Does anyone knows how can I configure UCM and weblogic?
    Thank you very much in advance!
    Regards.

    Hi ,
    If you are looking to use the WSDL to execute ucm services then use SoapUI IDE on development , there it requires only the http authentication method .
    Let me know if this is the actual requirement which you were looking for or if I have missed the point .
    I use this to quickly test WSDL and verify if the service being invoked is actually correct or not .
    Thanks,
    Srinath
    Edited by: Srinath Menon on Apr 26, 2013 11:32 AM

  • UCM 11g web services with HTTP authentication

    Is it possible to setup UCM 11g web services with HTTP authentication?
    I did setup UCM 11g web services using OWSM policies and are working well.
    But my development team wants to consume web services with only HTTP authentication (simple user name and password), do not want to use Keystore files and encryption.
    Please help me guys.
    Thank you in advance

    Hi ,
    If you are looking to use the WSDL to execute ucm services then use SoapUI IDE on development , there it requires only the http authentication method .
    Let me know if this is the actual requirement which you were looking for or if I have missed the point .
    I use this to quickly test WSDL and verify if the service being invoked is actually correct or not .
    Thanks,
    Srinath
    Edited by: Srinath Menon on Apr 26, 2013 11:32 AM

  • Integrate UCM 11g with SES 10g

    Hi all,
    Does anyone know if it is possible to connect SES 10g with UCM 11g? In the certification matrix of ECM 11g it says:
    Installation Type               Version Supported     Category                    Product                    Version                    Additional Comments / Exceptions                    
    "Oracle UCM Oracle URM"     11gR1 (11.1.1.3+)     Search Crawler Integration     Secure Enterprise Search     10g (10.1.8.4) 11g (11.1.2)     Crawler integration.                    
    "Oracle UCM Oracle URM"     11gR1 (11.1.1.3+)     Search (Full-text)               Secure Enterprise Search     11g (11.1.2)               For use as full-text search engine for UCM.                    
    Does this mean that SES 10g cannot be used as full text search engine with UCM 11g?
    Another related question: I seem to recall that starting from UCM 11g documents are stored in the database instead of on the file system by default. Is this true, and does this also require an 11g database version? I cannot find anything about this in the installation guide.
    Regards,
    Stijn

    Hi Bill,
    Unfortunately we're dealing with a Windows stack, and SES 11g isn't out yet for Windows.
    Regarding your second point: you guys at Fishbowl really have a solution for everything ;-).
    Have you also been able to solve the question I posted here: Region templates from Site Studio used  in Webcenter applicaton
    @Stijn wrote:
    Basically we're developing a portal application in WebCenter and we want to store pages as content in UCM. We also want to make use of the Site Studio
    contribution editor as this is the only way I see to be able to have a rich text editor with inline images.
    Btw: what I'm still looking for is a way for a user to easily upload and use an image from within the rich text editor. The basic feature is that when you want to
    insert an image, a search result of images is shown. This isn't really useful, as the number images might also increase to a 1000 or more.

  • Accounts in UCM 11g from external LDAP provider

    Hi,
    We are developing an application using UCM 11g. For authentication and authorization we are using external LDAP. Following are the steps followed to configure the UCM 11g for external LDAP.
    1) Created User and Groups directory in LDAP
    2) Created user and group in LDAP.
    3) Assigned users to the groups.
    3) Created accounts in group directory .Account name start with @ and ends with (RW)
    4) Created a new provider in WLS.
    5) Created a new JpsProvider in UCM.
    Now, roles(groups in LDAP) and user are coming properly form LDAP. but the accounts are populating in UCM.
    Can anybody tell me the solution for this problem
    Thanks in advance..
    Regards,
    Nitin

    In theory there is no limit, but as with most of the products and features inside the Content Server it comes down to design and size impacting performance.
    So there is no simple answer.
    The more complex answer is you need to try to keep things as simple as possible while still completing your goals.
    For instance the Folders component in 11g is limited (hard coded) to 1000 files per folder maximum due to performance degradation if you put more in your folders. Many people just try to put more in and before the hard coded limit in 11g people did and their folders browsing became almost unusable due to slow browsing of the folder structure and files in side.
    Similarly with Security we can impact performance with too many security groups, badly designed Roles to access security groups or badly designed Account structures. Notice I only said "too many" on Security groups but not "too many" on Accounts. You should try never to go above 25 security groups (this is not a hard coded limit just a best practice) and the "badly designed" part of roles and accounts can lead to bad performance and even broken security.
    It comes down to DB performance, DB limitations and code limits.
    First off be aware that there is a limit on how long a query in the DB can be. Commands and SQL in the DB are not endlessly long, there is a maximum number of characters. Keep that in mind as we go along into the next parts.
    Second be aware that if you make a badly built query it will take a long long time.
    Third be aware that when you are building security models in UCM these security structures go DIRECTLY to DB queries and remember the above 2 points.
    So every search in UCM is a query when you take it back to the DB level, and every search requires a behind the scenes security check to make sure you can read the documents you are searching for. So any query built in the search interface gets an additional set of parameters automatically when executed (security).
    So now we need to also think about your Metadata and not just the Security on that limited length DB back end. Do your users have 99 metadata fields (I hope not) and if they do do they use most of them while searching? How long will that query be before you add the security query?
    Back to the security parts with accounts.
    If you have your users having only a few roles providing only access to a small number of security groups and those same users only having a few accounts then searches will get a short security access query added since the number of additional checks for security are small. If the roles and group accesses and account accesses are very large (to the extreme limit) again this will be easy to make a short query due to the small number of excluded security roles and accounts.
    BUT and this is a biggie. IF the users are given a number of roles and accounts that is middle of the road for number of total accesses then the query is as long as it can be and if the metadata is complex and large too then you may be running into the limit of Query string in the DB and your query may get truncated which results in a broken security model maybe.
    That is not even talking about the efficiency of the query and how long it takes.....
    Sorry for the book like reply to your simple question, but it really is not a simple question. :)

  • UCM 11g File missing from search result although file is accessable

    When I do search without any criteria in UCM 11g, some files missing from search result although I know the files were checked into UCM already since I'm able to see these files using url similar to:
    http://ucm/cs/idcplg?idcService=GET_FILE&dID=12345
    or use following url to get document information:
    http://ucm/cs/idcplg?idcService=DOC_INFO&dID=12345
    the file is not in the search resule even search by ID.
    also, the seach result say "displaying 1-20" but only display few files (e.g. 2 files, less than 20)
    Is this a known problem? the same search was working in UCM 10 perfectly.
    Thanks

    The query seems able to retrieve the missing document. for example, I search by content ID, in the audit log (eanbled as you mentioned) give th efollowing information:
    fusionappsattachments/6     09.13 06:22:03.878     IdcServer-3474     --- @ResultSet SearchResults ---
    fusionappsattachments/6     09.13 06:22:03.878     IdcServer-3474     numFields=66,*numRows=1*,currentRow=0
    also, the infomation following above give the deteail field information which match with the missing document.
    I looks like UCM just did not bring it to UI as part of search result.
    This seems match with my another finding as I mentioned earlier: the seach result say "displaying 1-20" but only display few files (e.g. 2 files, less than 20)
    it seems query did find the documents but UI did not show it.
    Not sure if this is a known bug.

  • Oracle UCM 11G missing Web Form Editor

    Hello All,
    Oracle 10G UCM provided a WebForm Editor. After installation of newer version Oracle UCM 11G we found the feature is missing.
    Is there a substitute provided by Oracle in 11G version for the same?
    We need to provide functionality to end users where they could go and create some forms on their own. We were thinking to use Web-Form Editor for the same, but to our surprise we found the feature is missing.
    Can anyone suggest if we are missing something. Any help is appreciated.
    Thanks.

    Kent,
    You're correct that the general UCM docs don't include that detail, but the FormEditor component readme.txt does include that info. I didn't open the readme.doc, but the readme says that there's more info in there.
    From the component readme:
    <snip>
    Updated 2010-02-16
    The HTML editor UI is now only enabled if the configuration parameter HasWebFormEditorUI is set
    to true. See BUG 9218712
    </snip>
    Thanks,
    -ryan
    Ryan Sullivan | ECMconsultant
    http://www.ecmconsultant.net/
    Edited by: Ryan Sullivan on May 5, 2011 12:25 PM

  • How Indexing function in Oracle UCM 11g

    Hello All,
    I am using Oracle UCM 11g on Windows platform.
    I wanted to know as how the indexing in Oracle UCM Funtions? Here are few more questions related to this.
    1. If multiple language characters are added in document and if document is indexed, then
    how the data (tokens) will be stored in Database?
    2. How the search will function

    Hi
    1. If multiple language characters are added in document and if document is indexed, then
    a. how the data (tokens) will be stored in Database?
    This is stored in the DB tables IdcColl1 or IdcColl2 ( if DB FullText is search indexer engine) and table would be IdcText1 or IdcText2(if OracleTextSearch indexer is used) . It is these tables that store the entire data from the contents and they are referred to / queried when a FT search is invoked from UCM .
    b. how indexing will be done?
    Indexer would extract all the data from the contents in case of FT indexer mechanism and would store them in the DB tables mentioned above . It is stored in BLOB columns where in the extraction process would do an insert for every content item that is being processed when Collection Rebuild Cycle / Automatic Update cycle is started .
    2. What is settings to be done in Oracle and search engine for this?
    For DB the relevant UCM scripts need to be executed so that the correct role are created and the packages are created.
    3. What will be extra settings need to be done in case if the OS changes for example Linux.
    The relevant libraries need to be checked to make sure that indexer can access them since there are lots of dependent libraries for the indexer process which is invoked by the TextExport process and these libraries vary for different OS . As part of the indexer process to be running fine all that needs to be done is to install/enable the OS specific versions of ContentAccess component on UCM .
    Hope this gives an understanding on the Indexing part of UCM .
    Thanks
    Srinath

  • Oracle UCM 11g Config with DB

    Hi,
    I have configured Oracle UCM 11g in oracle sql developer, but am not able to see the tables related to Oracle UCM..(ex: Revisions, Docmeta).
    Any documentation on this or any one faced this kind of issue.
    Thanks...

    I'd suggest you to follow the Installation guide - see Oracle&amp;reg; Fusion Middleware Installing and Configuring Oracle WebCenter Content 11g Release 1 (11.1.1) - Contents
    In a nutshell, tables (and everything else in the data model) are created by a utility called RCU. This is one pre-req to run the installation. Another issue could be that you have done installation, but you don't use the correct db user (scheme owner) to connect. The correct user for an installed instance can be obtain from the Weblogic admin console.

Maybe you are looking for