Using bind variables in the model view for master detail

Hi all,
I have a master-detail views setup on the following two queries.
In the first query below - I use two bind variables to collect the start and end date.
you have to add (and :startDate = :startDate and :endDate = :endDate) or you will get errors - bind not defined in sql
I then use the viewQueryCriteria to collect the data on a search panel - so far so good. (Make the bind variables required) along with the other criteria.
The bind variables are displayed in the search panel and the data is entered correctly.
The query executes and all is happy.
VIEWOBJECT1
SELECT DepositAccounts.COA_ID,
... ChartOfAccounts.ACCOUNT_CODE || ' ' || ChartOfAccounts.ACCOUNT_TITLE as description
FROM DEPOSIT_ACCOUNTS DepositAccounts, DEPOSIT_ACCOUNT_DETAILS DepositAccountDetails, CHART_OF_ACCOUNTS ChartOfAccounts
WHERE DepositAccounts.ID = DepositAccountDetails.DEP_ACC_ID
and ChartOfAccounts.id = DepositAccountDetails.COA_ID
and :startDate = :startDate and :endDate = :endDate
Now I add the summation of a value (AMOUNT) to the view object (java - create view impl) to the VOViewRowImpl
and everything works - the value is shown in the transient attribute formatted and looking nice.
VIEWOBJECT2
SELECT PostingBatchAccounts.AMOUNT,
FROM POSTING_BATCH_ACCOUNTS PostingBatchAccounts, POSTING_BATCHES PostingBatches
where PostingBatchAccounts.PB_ID = PostingBatches.ID
and PostingBatches.SOURCE_DATE between :startDate and :endDate
Now I need to add the start date and end date to the child query - before the view executes (or the summation is calculated).
The attributes are in the where clause (PostingBatches.SOURCE_DATE between :startDate and :endDate) in VIEWOBJECT2 which is the child.
I need the child records and the summation to work with the date restrictions.
I would assume you could get access to the child view in the VOViewImpl file and set the bind variables there.
Everything I find is based on the JSF - not the model layer - this should be fairly easy (and common). can anyone give me a hand on this?

Similar Messages

How to use bind variables in the following query

CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE MMDB.test IS
sel_qtn VARCHAR2 (10);
CURSOR PT_QUANTITY IS select * from mmdb.product_tree WHERE QUANTITY_CHECK ='E'
AND run_id = 100
a PT_QUANTITY%ROWTYPE;
BEGIN
FOR i IN PT_QUANTITY
loop
sel_qtn := i.quanttity-1;
While sel_qtn>=1
loop
insert into mmdb.product_tree (BILLING_ACCOUNT_NO ,S_CODE) values (i.BILLING_ACCOUNT_NO ,i.S_CODE||'E');
sel_qtn :=sel_qtn -1;
End loop;
commit;
end;

Don't duplicate threads: How to use bind variables in the following query

How to use bind variable in the query to avoid hard parsing

Hi,
I have a query which is using literals
strquery:='SELECT SUMTOTAL FROM tab1 WHERE BATCHNO = '''
      || gBNo
      || ''' AND A_ID = '''
      || g_id
      || ''' AND L_ID = '''
      || g_LId
      || ''' AND S_Code = ''C_3'' ';
execute immediate strquery;I have been asked to use a bind variable to avoid hard parsing.
How do i do it?
Edited by: user8731258 on Jul 27, 2012 5:07 AM
Edited by: user8731258 on Jul 27, 2012 5:08 AM

You dont need Dynamic SQL. Your Table and Column Name are static in that query. Just use Static SQL
SELECT SUMTOTAL
INTO lSumTotal
FROM tab1
WHERE BATCHNO = gBatchNo
   AND ATM_ID = gAtm_id
   AND LOAD_ID = gLoadId
   AND STEP_CODE = 'C_3';

ORA-01722: invalid number caused with SQL using bind variable

Hi,
Im am hoping that someone can help me resolve a problem thats only just services and is being experienced on quite a few clients.
our application uses C++ exes and makes OCI calls to the database.
what has happened in the last week or so, there has been quite a few invalid number errors being received on a prod server but strangly enough we cannot reproduct the error on our UAT system.
The sql is using bind variables and the information in the trace file shows that a number is being used for the bind variable, here is an extract from one trace file:
for some schemas, the bind variable value is some currupted value, i think:
oacdty=01 mxl=32(21) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=03 fl2=1206001 frm=01 csi=178 siz=32 off=0
kxsbbbfp=9a8d62b8 bln=32 avl=03 flg=05
value="Â*d"
but on another schema, the value used is:
Bind#0
oacdty=01 mxl=32(32) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=03 fl2=1206001 frm=01 csi=178 siz=32 off=0
kxsbbbfp=c5f92718 bln=32 avl=04 flg=05
value="2101"
however both produce invalid number errors.
I am relatively inexperienced as a DBA so would appreciate as much help as i can get.

Could you post your sql statement that is being run.
Also post the query plan from your uat system and the one from your production system (They are likely to be different)
You can export the stats from your production system and run them in your uat system. If you do this, then the execution plans should be the same on both systems(dbms_stats) and if you have the same data you should run into the same problem on uat as in production.
The root cause of this type of problem is having a column in a table which holds values which are of different datatypes. Typically there is a condition in the where clause which indicates that for example only numeric columns should be retrieved from the column which holds multiple data types. However since the optimizer is free to rewrite the query any way it sees fit, (It does not necessarily execute in the order the sql statement is written) it does not filter this data first, and therefore you hit non-numeric data and run into the invalid number error.
You can use little techniques like using an inline view with rownum in the column list, to perform the first filter. This ensures that the inline view is executed on its own, rather than being merged (materialized) with the rest of the query.
A quick temporary solution is to use a comparison like to_char(column_name) = variable
Make sure your comparisons are correct and it doesn't negatively impact on performance of the query

Performance when using bind variables

I'm trying to show myself that bind variables improve performance (I believe it, I just want to see it).
I've created a simple table of 100,000 records each row a single column of type integer. I populate it with a number between 1 and 100,000
Now, with a JAVA program I delete 2,000 of the records by performing a loop and using the loop counter in my where predicate.
My first JAVA program runs without using bind variables as follows:
loop
stmt.executeUpdate("delete from nobind_test where id = " + i);
end loop
My second JAVA program uses bind variables as follows:
pstmt = conn.prepareStatement("delete from bind_test where id = ?");
loop
pstmt.setString(1, String.valueof(i));
rs = pstmt.executeQuery();
end loop;
Monitoring of v$SQL shows that program one doesn't use bind variables, and program two does use bind variables.
The trouble is that the program that does not use bind variables runs faster than the bind variable program.
Can anyone tell me why this would be? Is my test too simple?
Thanks.

[email protected] wrote:
I'm trying to show myself that bind variables improve performance (I believe it, I just want to see it).
I've created a simple table of 100,000 records each row a single column of type integer. I populate it with a number between 1 and 100,000
Now, with a JAVA program I delete 2,000 of the records by performing a loop and using the loop counter in my where predicate.
Monitoring of v$SQL shows that program one doesn't use bind variables, and program two does use bind variables.
The trouble is that the program that does not use bind variables runs faster than the bind variable program.
Can anyone tell me why this would be? Is my test too simple?
The point is that you have to find out where your test is spending most of the time.
If you've just populated a table with 100,000 records and then start to delete randomly 2,000 of them, the database has to perform a full table scan for each of the records to be deleted.
So probably most of the time is spent scanning the table over and over again, although most of blocks might already be in your database buffer cache.
The difference between the hard parse and the soft parse of such a simple statement might be negligible compared to effort it takes to fulfill each delete execution.
You might want to change the setup of your test: Add a primary key constraint to your test table and delete the rows using this primary key as predicate. Then the time it takes to locate the row to delete should be negligible compared to the hard parse / soft parse difference.
You probably need to increase your iteration count because deleting 2,000 records this way probably takes too short and introduces measuring issues. Try to delete more rows, then you should be able to spot a significant and constant difference between the two approaches.
In order to prevent any performance issues from a potentially degenerated index due to numerous DML activities, you could also just change your test case to query for a particular column of the row corresponding to your predicate rather than deleting it.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

Regarding usage of constants while using bind variables

Hi All,
Can some one please help me out of this situation?
I wrote a query in a package in which i am using bind variables for faster execution of the query in loops.
In the above said scenario i am trying to insert a set of data into a table say 'A' by selecting from some other table say 'B'. But i also need to insert some data which is constant.
Something like this:
constant_val varchar2(1):='N';
for i in 1 .. tab.count
loop
insert into A(Col1, Col2) values (select constant_val, B.value from B where B.value = tab(i));
end loop;
I wrote the query using bind variables in the manner:
for i in 1 .. tab.count
loop
execute immediate 'insert into A(Col1, Col2) values (select constant_val, B.value from B where B.value = :1)' using tab(i);
end loop;
This compiles, but does not run ... error said is PLSQL statement not properly ended.
I also tried the option of giving constant_value in the using clause and replacing the same in query using a bind variable. It still doesnt work.
Is there someway by which i can squeeze in the constant value also. Can someone please advise me on this?
Thanks in advance,
Praveen G S

but i was told that if i succeed
in reducing the hard parsing of queries .. i will get
better performance results .. Would i say too, at least for OLTP like systems
but if i cant or rather dont have to use it while
looping PLSQL tables and accessing data from other
tables using this data ... then what do we use it
for?? PL SQL is capable of bulk operations, so loop is less performant method to process data, however, if you can't do it bulk - for whatever reasons - do it in loop.
My remark was related mostly to dynamic sql, as shoblock already said, it seems to be no reason in your code to use dynamic sql, if you can use static...
What i not understand as well, why do you select a value from the table, if this value is already in your collection?
values (select constant_val, B.value from B where B.value = :1)' using tab(i);Best regards
Maxim

Using Bind Variables in Parameter Form's Query

I want to use bind variables in the query of Parameter form. But
it does not allows. What is the other way out. The structure of
my Parameter form is as under:
State:
Customer:
Now I want that I want to list only those customer in the
Customer LOV which belongs to the selected state.
Thanks.
Muhammad Nadeem

Can we just link to an oracle form using a url still as we can with reports? I've built a report that requires the user to select from a dynamic list as well, and I know how to do this through forms, but can I simply call the form from a webpage?

Making Quicktime the default viewer for .wmv files.

Whenever I try to open a .wmv file, my default program is iphoto. I have Flip4Mac and I want to use Quicktime to be the default viewer for it. I know how I can get each file to open with Quicktime, but I want it to be permanent. For instance, I download a .wmv file and I want to double click the new file on my desktop and Quicktime comes up so I can view the video. I figure this is a very simple thing to do, I just don't know where to change it. Please help. Thank you.

I find that this does not work- pilot error I'm sure.
When I right click on a .wmv file and chose "Get Info", a small window appears that has a section titled "Open With".It defaults to "Windows Media Player" and has a drop down window, offering me a choice of "Other..."
When I select "Other" a window opens that lets me chose an application. I select Quick Time Player and hit "Add". QT then populates the drop down window. I then select "Change ALL" which causes another window to open that asks "Are you sure you want all your Windows Media Player documents to open with the application Quick Time Player?". I answer "Continue" and as soon as I do that Windows Media Player is replaced in the Get Info window as the "Open With" choice.
I can't see how to make the change. Help!!

Query don't use the right index when using bind variables

Hi people !
I need some help because I have an issue with a query that don t use the right Indexes as it should
First of all, I have mainly three tables :
ORDER : Table that contains description for each Order (approximately 1 000 000 Records)
ORDER_MVTS : Table that contains the tasks made (called movements) to set up each Orders
with quantity of packages prepared for each product (approximately 10 000 000 Records)
PRODUCT : Tables that contains the products (approximately 50 000 Records)
When I launch the query with hard coded values, it brings back response very fast
because it uses the right index (ORDER_DHR_VALID) which represent the date and hour of the order
(with format 'DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'). The selectivity for this index is good.
NB 1: I have to use the trick " >= Trunc(date) and < trunc(date) +1 " to filter on a simple date because
the index contains hour and minutes (I know it wasn't probably a bright idea at conception time).
NB 2: The index on ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE is'nt discriminating enough because there is'nt enough different products.
It's the same for index on CUSTOMER_CODE and on MVT_TYPE so only the index on ORDER.DHR_VALID is good.
Here is the correct explain plan when I execute the query with hard coded values :
SELECT SUM(ORDER_MVTS.NB_PACKAGE)
FROM ORDER_MVTS, PRODUCT, ORDER
WHERE ORDER.DHR_VALID >= TRUNC(to_date('14/11/2008 10:04:56','DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'))
AND ORDER.DHR_VALID < TRUNC(to_date('14/11/2008 10:04:56','DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS')) + 1
AND ORDER_MVTS.MVT_TYPE = 'DELIVERY'
AND PRODUCT.CODE = ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE
AND ORDER_MVTS.ORDER_CODE = ORDER.CODE
AND ORDER.CUSTOMER_CODE = 'ADIDAS'
AND PRODUCT.CODE = 1234
Rows Row Source Operation
1 SORT AGGREGATE
2 NESTED LOOPS
4 NESTED LOOPS
2 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN (object id 378548) --> PRODUCT_PK
4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER
777 INDEX RANGE SCAN (object id 378119) --> ORDER_DHR_VALID
2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER_MVTS
30 INDEX RANGE SCAN (object id 377784) --> ORDER_MVTS_ORDER_FK
Now the problem is when the query is used in a Cursor with bind variables.
It seems like Oracle don't use index on ORDER.DHR_VALID because he can't figure out that he have
to actually filter on a short period of time (only one day).
So Oracle uses the index on ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE which is'nt a bright idea (it takes 10 secondes instead of just one)
Here is the bad explain plan :
Rows Row Source Operation
1 SORT AGGREGATE
2 NESTED LOOPS
722 NESTED LOOPS
2 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN (object id 378548) --> PRODUCT_PK
722 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER_MVTS
1790 INDEX RANGE SCAN (object id 377777) --> ORDER_MVTS_PRODUCT_FK
2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER
1442 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN (object id 378439) --> ORDER_PK
Now I have found two solutions to this problem :
1) using a Hint to force the use of index on ORDER.DHR_VALID (with /*+ INDEX(ORDER ORDER_DHR_VALID) */ )
2) Using Dynamic SQL and keeping the date hard coded (but not the other values except mvt_type)
For example :
QUERY :=
'SELECT SUM(ORDER_MVTS.NB_PACKAGE)
FROM ORDER_MVTS, PRODUCT, ORDER
WHERE ORDER.DHR_VALID >= TRUNC(TO_DATE('''||To_char(P_DTE_VAL,'DD/MM/YYYY')||''',''DD/MM/YYYY'')) '||
AND ORDER.DHR_VALID < TRUNC(TO_DATE('''||To_char(P_DTE_VAL,'DD/MM/YYYY')||''',''DD/MM/YYYY'')) + 1 '||
AND ORDER_MVTS.MVT_TYPE = 'DELIVERY'
AND PRODUCT.CODE = ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE
AND ORDER_MVTS.ORDER_CODE = ORDER.CODE
AND ORDER.CUSTOMER_CODE = :CUSTOMER
AND PRODUCT.CODE = :CODE ';
These two solutions work but Number 1 is bad in theory because it uses a Hint
and Number 2 may be difficult to code.
So my question is : Does someone knows another solution to force the use of index ORDER_DHR_VALID that can be simple and reliable.
Thank you very much for support
Edited by: remaï on Apr 1, 2009 4:08 PM

What version of oracle you have? CBO work is different in 9i and 10g.
Usually cost based optimizer do not want to use index for >< condition with binding variables because optimizer can not use statistic to determine selectivity, and by default selectivity of <> operators is low.
(As I remember '>' selectivity by default is 5%, you have two conditions > and <, therefore resulting selectivity will be 0.05*0.05=0.0025 as two independent events, but selectivity of other conditions
ORDER_MVTS.MVT_TYPE = 'DELIVERY' or ORDER.CUSTOMER_CODE = 'ADIDAS' looks much better for CBO)
The best solution I see is do not use binding variables. Actually your query looks as searching query, which executes not so often, therefore you will not have perfomance win along of skipping execution plan creation.
Edited by: JustasVred on Apr 1, 2009 10:10 AM

Use of bind variables with the oracle db - to improve library cache perform

Dear Friends,
We are using oracle 9.0.1.1.1 db server - the performance of the db was pathetic and upon investigation it was revealed that the library cache was over loaded with sql hard parses generated by not using bind variables. We are using vb as a front end with oracle and our connection object in vb is created using ole db for oracle provided by oracle (installed from oracle client custom - programmer option).
I would appreciate if any body can tell how can we use bind variables in vb to connect to oracle such that the hard parses can be changed into soft parses.
Your effort to bring some peace in my life is worth comendable and I would be very obliged for your time and help.
Thanks a lot.
Bye
Take care.
qj

Generally, you would use bind variables by changing statements that are written like this
select * from emp where empno=6678 and ename='Jones'
so that they're written like
select * from emp where empno=? and ename=?
How you then bind these question marks to the particular values you want depends on the API you're using (ADO? OLE DB directly?, etc). If you have a support contract, there are plenty of examples for any API on metalink.oracle.com
Justin

Possible for Oracle to consider constraints when using bind variable?

Consider the following table with a check constraint listing the possible values of the column
create table TEST_TABLE(
my_column varchar2(10));
insert into TEST_TABLE select 'VALUE1' from dba_objects;
alter table TEST_TABLE
add constraint TEST_TABLE_CHK1
check (my_column in ('VALUE1', 'VALUE2'));
begin dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(ownname=>user,tabname=>'TEST_TABLE');END;Let's see the number of logical I/O's needed for the following SQL statements.
(The value was obtained by the delta ofselect m.value from v$mystat m, v$statname n
where name='session logical reads' and m.statistic#=n.statistic#)
If string lateral is used:
declare
   n number;
begin
select count(*) into n from test_table where my_column='VALUE1';
end;
Consistent Gets: 21
declare
   n number;
begin
select count(*) into n from test_table where my_column='VALUE2';
end;
Consistent Gets: 21
declare
   n number;
begin
select count(*) into n from test_table where my_column='VALUE3';
end;
Consistent Gets: 0Oracle can eliminate the table if it knows the queried value can't satisfy the constraint. Good.
(Actually, the execution plan for the last query included the 'FILTER' operation.)
However, if bind variable is used:
declare
   n number;
   x varchar2(10);
begin
x := 'VALUE1';
select count(*) into n from test_table where my_column=x;
end;
Consistent Gets: 21
declare
   n number;
   x varchar2(10);
begin
x := 'VALUE3';
select count(*) into n from test_table where my_column=x;
end;
Consistent Gets: 21Oracle can't eliminate the table using the constraint. I can understand that because bind variables are used, Oracle can't directly eliminate the table when generating the execution plan. However, is it possible to eliminate the table, or at least employ some shortcut in runtime? If not, will this be a performance loss compared with using values laterals when check constraint exists?
(And is it possible to use autotrace on PL/SQL block in sqlplus?)
Oracle:
     10.2.0.4 SE
     11.2.0.2 SE
OS:
     RHEL5

However, is it possible to eliminate the table, or at least employ some shortcut in runtime? I can't see how to do this. Oracle has a sqltext that has an embedded bind variable in it. And for this sqltext it has an execution plan in the shared pool that will be used irrespective of the actual bound values at runtime.
Maybe in 11G, with adaptive cursor sharing / plan bind awareness, Oracle might be smart enough to introduce a second execution plan for the VALUE3 case.
If not, will this be a performance loss compared with using values laterals when check constraint exists?Only if you submit the dumb query and search for records with VALUE3... Normally your application code would not hold/generate these queries.
Will it?
For columns whose values are bound by a CHECK constraint, one might even consider to never use bind variables, since very likely you will have few versions of queries that use these columns.
Not?
Edited by: Toon Koppelaars on Jun 22, 2011 1:20 PM

Do not use bind variable notations for p_session_id argument...

Hi there,
... in apex_custom_auth.login the Apex doc says. Does anyone know why not?
LOGIN Procedure
Also referred to as the "Login API," this procedure performs authentication and session registration.
p_session_id Current Oracle Application Express session ID.
Note: Do not use bind variable notations for p_session_id argument.Thanks
Luis

I tend to avoid assigning values to bind variables like that - but it may be due to the nature of much of my code residing in PL/SQL packages.
And due to the strange encounters I have had with this, like your linked discussions, I've tended towards using apex_util instead.
You may also enjoy this discussion
http://www.danielmcghan.us/2012/08/implicit-commits-in-apex.html
Scott

Tcode PFAL there is no model view for the distribution of HR Data.

Hi friends ,
i am facing new problem,i want to send iDOC to other system.
previeous its working fine.
but to day when i open tcode PFAL.
it give me Error:"There is no model view for the distribution of HR master data"
what is the solution for that.
i want to send HR Data.
its urgent please give me any solution ithat will help me alot.
thanks in advance

There is already Distributed Model Created.
can u give me annother tcode so i can send Metarial data, by IDOC.
please help me.
Thanks

Using Bind Variable in a SELECT

Hi,
I'm trying to build up my SQL query at run-time using bind variables and in the Oracle® Fusion Middleware Fusion Developer's Guide for Oracle Application Development Framework 11g Release 1 (11.1.1) it says that 'After defining the bind variables, the next step is to reference them in the SQL statement. While SQL syntax allows bind variables to appear both in the SELECT list and in the WHERE clause, you'll typically use them in the latter context, as part of your WHERE clause.'.
However, when I try to use the bind variables in my SELECT list because I've had to set a type for the variable to String the variable gets inserted with inverted commas either side e.g. SELECT 'Service' FROM TestTable. Is it possible to use bind variables to insert a value into my select list without these inverted commas around it?
Thanks in advance,
Tom

OK, thanks for your response. Do you know of a way then where I can control my SELECT parameters programmatically? I'm currently trying to do it using the information in the chapter '35.9 Using Programmatic View Objects for Alternative Data Sources' from the Oracle® Fusion Middleware Fusion Developer's Guide for Oracle Application Development Framework 11g Release 1 (11.1.1). I think I'm part way there, would this be the correct way of acheiving what I want?
Cheers, Tom

BUG ? : ADF creating extra VO instance using bind variables in a LOV query

ADF 11.1.1.1.0
After "playing around" with bind variables Setting bind variables in view objects for LOV I've come across something strange that I've reproduce using the HR schema and tables Employees and Departments. Its a bit long but here goes :
Using the HR schema tables departments and employeesI'm trying to create a LOV (selectOneChoice) for the
employee department, the LOV having a bind variable that limits the values returned in this case returning only DepartmentId = 50
I've create a VO lovDepartment (not based on an EO) with the following query :
SELECT Departments.DEPARTMENT_ID,
       Departments.DEPARTMENT_NAME,
       Departments.MANAGER_ID,
       Departments.LOCATION_ID
FROM DEPARTMENTS Departments
where DEPARTMENT_ID = :pDeptIdA LOV has been defined on the DepartmentId attribute of the EmployeesView.
The lovDepartmentImpl overrides the executeQueryForCollection to set the bind variable value.
    @Override
    protected void executeQueryForCollection(Object object, Object[] object2,
                                             int i) {
        setNamedWhereClauseParam("pDeptId", "50");
        super.executeQueryForCollection(object, object2, i);
    }When using an ADF form to create a new employee the DepartmentId lov is empty.
Enabling SQL tracing shows the following :
[370] _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0 ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, pDeptId, null)
[371] _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0 ViewRowSetImpl.execute caused params to be "un"changed
[372] Column count: 4
[373] _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0 ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, pDeptId, null)
[374] _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1 ViewRowSetImpl.setNamedWhereClauseParam(pDeptId, 50)
[375] ViewObject: _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1 Created new QUERY statement
[376] _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1>#q computed SQLStmtBufLen: 235, actual=195, storing=225
[377] SELECT Departments.DEPARTMENT_ID,
       Departments.DEPARTMENT_NAME,
       Departments.MANAGER_ID,
       Departments.LOCATION_ID
FROM DEPARTMENTS Departments
where DEPARTMENT_ID = :pDeptId
[378] Bind params for ViewObject: _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1
[379] For RowSet : _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0
[380] Binding null of type 12 for "pDeptId"
[381] No Resource Bundle found but null value id:LOV_DepartmentId_LOVUIHints_NullValueId is defined in an ListBinding Definition.It would seem that 2 lovDepartment instances are used one at line 370 LOCALVIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0
and one at line 374 LOCALVIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1
The one at line 374 LOCALVIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1 gets the variable bound at line 374
however LOCALVIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0 gets a null value and would explain the empty LOV
Can anybody explain what is happening here ? (and how to use bind variables in LOV queries)
Regards
Paul
(bump)
Edited by: Paul (MITsa) on Jul 14, 2009 10:46 AM
I've now tried all types of LOV from ChoiceList to Radio groupe by testing the application module - none of them work.....
Edited by: Paul (MITsa) on 14-Jul-2009 22:52

when you rinvoke executeQueryForCollection the bind variables are allready set and they exist in Object[] object2 method parameters.
in order to change them you need something like:
private void changeGenericBindVariable(Object[] params, String paramName, Object paramValue) {
for (int i = 0; i < params.length; i++) {
if (paramName.equals(((Object[])params)[0].toString()))
((Object[])params[i])[1] = paramValue;
* executeQueryForCollection - overridden for custom java data source support.
protected void executeQueryForCollection(Object qc, Object[] params,
int noUserParams) {
changeGenericBindVariable(params, "pDeptId", "50")
super.executeQueryForCollection(object, object2, i);
But its better to set bind variables before you executeQueryForCollection. like when you invoke LOV.
For cascading LOVs and the problems i have check:
[http://adfbugs.blogspot.com/2009/07/jdeveloper-11-r1-cascading-lov-bugs.html]

Using bind variables in the model view for master detail

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for