Using disk created with different security option

Hi
I'm struggling with using my backups / sparsebundle I originally created "With Device Password". I wanted to give my nephew access to my Airport Time Capsule 7.7.2 and changed the disk sharing option to "With Accounts" and set up two accounts. When I went back to Time Machine, I had no access to the previously used disk. But I want to continue using this disk for incremental backups and any potential recovery task.
After reading this http://discussions.apple.com/message/22323537#22323537 and others, I moved the sparsebunde file to my user account disk, replacing the new one created today. However, under System Preferences, Time Machine does not seem to recognise any "Latest Backup". It just displays the remmanent space available. Is it safe to perform a new backup? I'm afraid if I do a new backup this could replace all the content on the original disk or mess things further up. Any full backup would be larger than the space available on the ATC. Hope somebody can give me some input.
Thanks.

Wow, thanks LaPastenague. If I had seen the pondini web page I had saved myself a lot of trouble. But I fixed it by miracle. Let me explain:
When I went to Airport Utility, I selected the Disks tab and chose Secure Shared Disks 'With Accounts'. There were no accounts there, not even my proper user account as defined by Mac. So I 'created' them mirroring my nephew's and my MBP's user account details. So I got a new disk as result. The original disk was unaccessible. Scared as I was, I looked in Finder for the Airport TC, made all files visible and found two folders, one called 'Data', the original one, and the new with my user name. Each had a machinename.sparsebundle file and Data still had its own intact. I would make a copy of it, but it was impossible due to its size (1.5TB). Under TM, I could not find / select it anymore. So I went back to Airport, undid the disk sharing 'With Accounts" and reverted to 'With device password'. But then, against any logic, I could not even find the original 'disk' - neither under TM nor in Finder! Next, I reverted Airport to 'With Accounts' sharing, and in Finder I moved the file to my new user folder within Airport, as I said. After posting my question here I had a phone call and forgot to disable TM! When I came back to my MBP TM was backing up... just an increment! So I guess I was saved by chance. I had some important backups I luckily could save and are still there.
I hope this helps others with the same issue. But I recommend to have a look at the Pondini's guide before messing with any settings in Airport / Time Machine. I found I can't use intuituon with Airport as I do with Macs. They seem to be different philosophies in spite of being both Apple. I learnt my lesson. The good thing is that, for whatever reason, 'with accounts' Airport and TM seem now to work more smoothly.

Similar Messages

  • Create run-as-account with less secure option in C#

    Hi all,
    Is there any way I can create run-as-account using C# code with less secure option.
    I have referred this code.
    ManagementGroup managementGroup = ManagementGroup.Connect(System.Environment.MachineName);
    Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.Security.SimpleCredentialSecureData runAsAccount = new Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.Security.SimpleCredentialSecureData();
    runAsAccount.Data = ConvertToSecureString("sample");
    runAsAccount.Description = "Sample run_as_account_description";
    runAsAccount.Name = "Run_as_account";
    runAsAccount.UserName = "sample@abc";
    managementGroup.Security.InsertSecureData(runAsAccount);
    But it creates account with more secure option.

    Hi,
    I searched the internet and found below link about SecureData type, not sure whether it can be useful for you as I am not familiar with
    SimpleCredentialSecureData() method, but you may refer to it and check it.
    SecureDataType Enumeration
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh964361.aspx
    In addition, I would liketo suggest you also post in the MSDN forum for coding issue.
    Regards,
    Yan Li
    Regards, Yan Li

  • Using Aperture library with different accounts

    I needed to use my library with two different accounts that are on the same MBP. I read where you might be able to put the library on an external disk and check ignore ownership on the info of the HDD. I had recently installed a 320GB HDD to avoid having to drag around an external so I thought maybe if I partitioned the drive it would "see" the second partition as an external. I partitioned off 50GB and checked the "ignore ownership" in the bottom left corner of the info window. I option+opened Aperture and created a new library in the second HDD. After opening Aperture, I imported a few pics into the library and made dup's. I modified them in my account, closed out of Aperture and logged off. I then logged in under my wife's account and was able to open Aperture by option+opening Aperture and choosing the new library location. The pics that I had imported under my log-in were there as well as the the modified versions. I re-modified the versions to see if it work the other way. I closed out of Aperture and logged out of my wife's account and logged in under mine. I clicked on the Aperture icon in my dock and it came right up w/out any problems. I was able to view the versions that I re-modified under my wife's log-in.
    I know you shouldn't share the library across users just in case two account users are trying to access the same library at the same time; but in my case it is one laptop with two accounts so we wouldn't physically be able to access it at the same time.
    So if you have a big enough HDD and you don't want to drag around an external, partition it however big you think you'll need it, check the "ignore ownership" box in the HDD info window, add read & write permissions for the different accounts, move/copy your current library to the new partition and option+open Aperture to choose the new location.

    Thanks! Just the answer that I was looking for! I had tried just moving the library into the shared directory, but, as we now know, this does not work.
    Now only if I had a partition on my local HD (with "ignore ownership" set)...

  • Using playlists created with Winamp

    Hey all,
    I have a bunch of playlists that I created using Winamp, and it'd be awesome if I could also play them with iTunes. Problem is, when I import them into iTunes my library suddenly shows duplicates for each song that's in the play list. With more than 2,600 songs in a single list, that's a big problem.
    The Winamp playlist is in the M3U format, but Winamp makes it possible to save lists in several other formats as well. Not sure if that makes a difference or not.
    Thanks for helping if you can.

    Wow, thanks LaPastenague. If I had seen the pondini web page I had saved myself a lot of trouble. But I fixed it by miracle. Let me explain:
    When I went to Airport Utility, I selected the Disks tab and chose Secure Shared Disks 'With Accounts'. There were no accounts there, not even my proper user account as defined by Mac. So I 'created' them mirroring my nephew's and my MBP's user account details. So I got a new disk as result. The original disk was unaccessible. Scared as I was, I looked in Finder for the Airport TC, made all files visible and found two folders, one called 'Data', the original one, and the new with my user name. Each had a machinename.sparsebundle file and Data still had its own intact. I would make a copy of it, but it was impossible due to its size (1.5TB). Under TM, I could not find / select it anymore. So I went back to Airport, undid the disk sharing 'With Accounts" and reverted to 'With device password'. But then, against any logic, I could not even find the original 'disk' - neither under TM nor in Finder! Next, I reverted Airport to 'With Accounts' sharing, and in Finder I moved the file to my new user folder within Airport, as I said. After posting my question here I had a phone call and forgot to disable TM! When I came back to my MBP TM was backing up... just an increment! So I guess I was saved by chance. I had some important backups I luckily could save and are still there.
    I hope this helps others with the same issue. But I recommend to have a look at the Pondini's guide before messing with any settings in Airport / Time Machine. I found I can't use intuituon with Airport as I do with Macs. They seem to be different philosophies in spite of being both Apple. I learnt my lesson. The good thing is that, for whatever reason, 'with accounts' Airport and TM seem now to work more smoothly.

  • Using BC4J Components with different App Servers

    Can we use BC4J with 3rd party Application Servers (WebSphere, Weblogic, iPlanet etc)?
    If so any advantages (Performance, Implementation, installation) in using these components with Oracle iAS?
    Thanks
    null

    BC4J allows different ways of deploying your application.
    1) Local Mode : where your client application and BC4J application are colocated togther and running in the same VM
    2) As a EJB session bean
    3) As a corba server object.
    Using the Local mode deployment option you can deploy the BC4J application to any appservers (weblogic, websphere, iplanet) as long as they have standard VM and if your client application is JSP or Servlet then the appservers need a JSP or Servlet engine.
    In JDeveloper 3.1 you can deploy BC4J applicaiton as EJB session bean to Oracle8i
    In JDeveloper 3.2 ( which will released in next few weeks) you can deploy BC4J application as EJB session bean to Oracle8i , Oracle iAS and weblogic .
    iAS comes preconfigured with BC4J runtime by default
    raghu

  • Format a 3TB HD using Disk Utility with Yosemite?

    Can a 2014 Macbook Pro running Yosemite format a 3TB HD intended for an external case using disk utility? I've had issues in the past with a 2010 Macbook Pro and am hoping its now not an issue.

    There should be no problem.  There might be a problem if the given HDD has some proprietary software installed by the manufacturer.
    Ciao.

  • Using DLLs created with LabWindows/CVI 8.0.0 in LabWindows/CVI 8.0.1

    Hi,
    I have created a project containing some methods with LabWindows/CVI 8.0.0 and then build the project and generated the DLL and LIB files. These DLL and LIB files are working fine in another projects created in LabWindows/CVI 8.0.0 (even on another machines).
    But when I use these DLL and LIB files in a project created with LabWindows/CVI 8.0.1 on another machine and try to call the methods of these files, the following error occurs: -
    "The program has caused a 'Unknown' fault at 001B:7C812AFB"
    Is this error occurs due to ther version mismatch or there is some other problem?
    Please help me to resolve this issue.
    Thanks,
    Sarabjit Singh

    Judging from this, I don't think NI has a newer version of this tool:
    http://forums.ni.com/t5/Measurement-Studio-for-VC/Convert-project-from-LabWindows-CVI-to-Visual-Stud...

  • Using disk utility with Time Capsule backup disk

    When backing up, i get an error msg that tells me to run disk utility on my backup drive. It says it's having problems coping files. In Disk Utiltiy, I don't see a way to choose the time capsule backup drive but only the hard drive on my laptop. Help pls.

    The error message is fundamentally stupid. You cannot use disk utility on a network drive.
    You can however fix or test the sparsebundle which is the virtual disk file TM creates on the TC.
    See A5 here. http://pondini.org/TM/Troubleshooting.html

  • MM INVOICE created with different Payment Terms and 2 differents PO.

    I will explain with an example to understand better the issue and why this could happen, (for the same Co.Code):
    On 05.09.2011, 5203795529 was posted with payment terms D030.
    At that time, PO #: 4501105395 was having payment terms D030 while PO #: 4501232207 was having payment term D031.
    Invoice 5203795529 was posted successfully.
    On 12.09.2011, 5203806574 was posted with payment terms D030.
    At that time, PO #: 4501105395 was having payment terms D030 while PO #: 4501232207 was having payment term D031.
    Invoice 5203795529 was posted successfully.
    In OCT, user receives another invoice for this 2 POs (4501232207 & 4501105395) and trying to post MIRO again but this time, user encountered error 'Payment terms in purchase order 4501232207 differ from current terms'. In order to proceed, user has changed payment term for 4501105395 from D030 to D031 on 17.10.2011 and proceed with invoice posting without error. 5203878342 was posted on 17.10.2011.
    The vendor always has the same Payment Term: D031
    Now the question is, why user is able to post without any problem previously even though there's different payment terms on both POs and not now anymore?.
    Thanks

    Thanks Jayavar,
    Nobody has changed anything, (I mean the PO Payment terms),  until October in PO. 4501105395
    The error message is when the user try to post with MIRO PO´s (4501232207 & 4501105395):
    "Terms of payment in purchase order 4501232207 (always with Payment term D031), differ from current terms"
    Message no. M8349
    Diagnosis:
    The terms of payment in the current invoice differ from those in the current purchase order 4501232207, other terms of payment were stipulated:
    Terms of payment key D031
    1st cash discount period 31 days 0,000%
    Either you have selected more purchase orders with different terms of payment, or you have changed the terms of payment manually.
    But the strange thing is in SEP, there's already this difference & there is no problem posting the invoice & the problem only comes when in OCT.
    Thanks and Rgs
    Francisco

  • How can I burn a disk image using disk utility with an external device?

    I am trying to burn a disk image on DVD using disk utility in OS 10.3.9.
    When I click the 'burn' button only the internal CD-writer appears allthough an external DVD-burner is connected via USB 2.0.
    Does anybody have an idea how to make disk utility recognize the external device?

    Try installing PatchBurn.
    (26583)

  • Sharepoint Cross-Site Content Rollup using Sharepoint Designer with Different Sites deployed in different ports

    Hi
    In Sharepoint Designer Cross Site Content Rollup is achieved using SOAP service in different site collections in Same domain (Same Port where site is deployed). Please provide the information that different sites in different
    ports.
    For Eg: Site A in one port (1000) and Site B in Another Port(2000). I want to access it from site A SP List in Site B using Sharepoint designer.

    HI Krupesh,
    You can call the web service or REST API to update the item in List B and List C in workflow.
    Below mentioned links help in calling web service activity in workflow:
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/dn567558%28v=office.15%29.aspx
    http://sergeluca.wordpress.com/2013/04/09/calling-the-sharepoint-2013-rest-api-from-a-sharepoint-designer-workflow/
    Best Regards,
    Brij K

  • How to compare 2 arrays with different operator options using parameters in Teststand

    Pls let me know how to compare 2 arrays using different operators like <= or >= or ==......

     I am using TS 2010. FYI
    ex:
    Array XX [ A_Temp,
                   B_Temp,
                   C_Oil Pressure,
                   D_Oilpressure,
    Note : A_Temp, B_Temp,C_Oil Pressure,D_Oilpressure all these parameters will be getting  numerical values (dynamically) from the simulink models and also in future I may need to add parameters to this array.
    Array YY [A_Temp_1,
                   B_Temp_2,
                   C_Oil Pressure_3,
                   D_Oilpressure_4,
    Note : A_Temp_1, B_Temp_2,C_Oil Pressure_3,D_Oilpressure_4 all these parameters will be getting  numerical values (dynamically) from the simulink models
    So my question :
    I would like to verify A_Temp >= A_Temp_1
                                B_Temp >= B_Temp_2
                                C_Oil Pressure  >= C_Oil Pressure_3  etc

  • Can I have 2 routers with different security and broadcast modes off same modem?

    Hi
    Apologies for not being too technical.  The background is that I have a mac and a dell laptop, both of which used to work off a Linksys WRT54G wireless router even though both computers are set up for N routers.  I then bought a Logitech Squeezebox internet radio, again working off the Linksys G.  The security on all 3 was WEP.
    I was then advised to upgrade my router to N and change security to WPA.  I bought a Netgear WNR2000 N wireless router as the local shop did not have any linksys n routers.  I tried to set up the three devices to this router but it seems that the radio will only broadcast G and WEP security.
    It then appeared that I would have to downgrade the other two computers back to G and WEP also and when I did that the internet speed really slowed down.
    My query is this, can I set up the Netgear N to be linked to my modem and broadcasting at N and WPA, thus linking my computers at top speed, and then can I link my Linksys to my Netgear and have that broadcast a different network on G/WEP for my radio?  If I can or if there is a better solution could someone tell me in easy steps how to do it?
    Very much obliged.

    You don't have to downgrade your router. Just enable mixed mode so it will allow wireless N and G devices to connect to the router. However, it will share the same wireless security mode.
    With regards to your query, the answer is yes. You can setup two (2) wireless routers, one providing N and WPA while the other one providing G and WEP. It might be a little complicated though. You have to cascade the routers. Both should have different SSID and channel.
    Try this setup first before changing the wireless options.

  • Problems in using a certificate with  different versions of JVM

    Hi friends,
    I am facing a typical problem:
    I have to use a certificate which uses the sha1DSA signing algorithm to contact a web service(I am coding a client). I was using J2SDK_1.4.1_02 before. I added the certificate to keystore and it was working fine. But if I upgraded my JRE to 1.4.2_13 the same code doesn't work,. I got the following exception:
    javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: No trusted certificate found
         at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.BaseSSLSocketImpl.a(DashoA12275)
         at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.a(DashoA12275)
         at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.a(DashoA12275)
         at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SunJSSE_az.a(DashoA12275)
         at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SunJSSE_az.a(DashoA12275)
         at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SunJSSE_ax.a(DashoA12275)
         at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.a(DashoA12275)
         at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.j(DashoA12275)
         at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.b(DashoA12275)
         at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.startHandshake(DashoA12275)
         at sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsClient.afterConnect(DashoA12275)
         at sun.net.www.protocol.https.AbstractDelegateHttpsURLConnection.connect(DashoA12275)
         at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getOutputStream(HttpURLConnection.java:570)
         at sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsURLConnectionImpl.getOutputStream(DashoA12275)
         at com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnection.post(HttpSOAPConnection.java:263)
         at com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnection$PriviledgedPost.run(HttpSOAPConnection.java:151)
         at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
         at com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnection.call(HttpSOAPConnection.java:121)
         at TestRequest.getCustomerInfo(TestRequest.java:60)
         at TestRequest.main(TestRequest.java:122)After some investigation I found that this JRE is accepting only certificate with sha1RSA signature algorithm. Please help me if anybody knows why this occurs or is this an issue which is to be addressed in server side.

    Hi Michal,
    Keeping in mind the recommendations of the Production Checklist...
    All other things being equal, homogenous deployments are usually less prone to surprises.
    But JDK 1.6 is noticeably faster than JDK 1.4, and features much better JMX support as well, so it's a probably the better option.
    Jon Purdy
    Oracle

  • EBS R12 - Multipl Instance using Single Databse ( with Different SID )

    Hi,
    Is it possible to create Multiple R12 EBS instance (i.e. TEST and DEV ), in to Single Database ( using same database binary ).
    Or Can these different EBS instance , configured with Single Database using differant Oralce SID ( means creating Multiple databases with Single binary )
    Please guide,
    Thanks

    Is it possible to create Multiple R12 EBS instance (i.e. TEST and DEV ), in to Single Database ( using same database binary ).No.
    Or Can these different EBS instance , configured with Single Database using differant Oralce SID ( means creating Multiple databases with Single binary )No -- Each instance/database should have its own ORACLE_HOME.
    Thanks,
    Hussein

Maybe you are looking for