Using Fotomagico with Aperture

Hello,
Does anyone have any experience using the slide show program Fotomagico with Aperture? It has a feature where you can access your iPhoto libraries easily to create slideshows but doesn't seem to have the same access to the Aperture libraries. A
Has anyone discovered any workaround for this or do I just have to export images into a folder and use them that way.
Cheers,
Lisa
www.lisahaskins.com

The reason you cannot drag-n-drop right out of Aperture is really quite simple.
It would involve the same steps as you exporting a version.
The photo you see in iPhoto is either the original imported JPG, or a JPG from the imported RAW file, or a modified JPG(if you have made any enhancements/cropping to the image), so dragging and dropping works well there because you are merely copying a file from the filesystem to the application.
IF you could drag-and-drop from Aperture, users would complain that it is too slow, and much slower than silly iPhoto! The reason it would be slow is it would involve a full rendering of a new JPG based on the changes you applied.. this would take just as long as exporting the image the old way.
Ever made a change to an image in iPhoto? When you move to the next it tells you to wait while it regenerates the new stored image. Imagine Aperture doing that! No thanks!
I have used Fotomagico(which IMHO is THE choice for slideshows) with images from Aperture. I make an album either at the project level or the folder(of projects) level and drag in the images I want to use for the slide show. Once I have made those choices I export them all to a folder and point Fotomagico at it. Works great!
I am sure V2 of Aperture will have some sort of slideshow tool built in, but probably not as robust as an external dedicated app like Fotomagico.

Similar Messages

  • I ordered my Macbook Air with Aperture two years ago. I now have an iMac - can I use that with Aperture in any way?

    I ordered my Macbook Air with Aperture two years ago. I now have an iMac - can I use that with Aperture in any way? I appreciate that it is a different computer but I am now the end user of both devices and I was just wondering if it was possible.
    Thanks,
    Sean

    The answer would be in your software license agreement for Aperture. However if you cannot locate it you can ask in the Aperture forum, the link for that is:
    https://discussions.apple.com/community/professional_applications/aperture
    However I believe you can have Aperture installed on two machines however only one may be using it at a time.
    On the new iMac launch the Mac App Store - Purchased - look for Aperture and download to your new machine.

  • Anyone using MBA with Aperture?

    I'm considering getting an MBA, but (aside from the limited hd space) I'm concerned about how efficiently it will run aperture. If you are a current owner and work with aperture regularly, I would appreciate your feedback. Thanks!

    Yes, it is possible. The fan will spin up, but for heavy loads use another solution.

  • Who Uses Applescript with Aperture and Why?

    From time to time, I come see Applescript mentioned by Aperture Users. The Apple Support website devotes a few paragraphs.
    For an amateur with lots of time. how would Applescript make my experience with Aperture any better? It automates what?

    http://www.apple.com/aperture/resources/pdf/Aperture_3_AppleScript_Reference.pdf
    http://apertureexpert.squarespace.com/forum-applescript/
    http://www.macosxautomation.com/applescript/aperture/publish/index.html
    http://www.macworld.com/article/2033806/import-like-a-pro-in-aperture.html
    There's also an application that will give you lots of statistics on your Aperture library (lenses used, etc):
    http://www.apertureexpert.com/inspector
    I'm pretty sure it uses AppleScript to get the data.

  • Using Macbookpro with Aperture photos on external hard drive

    I have now just about filled up my macbook pro. So I am now moving my pictures folder to an external drive. I have never done this before but it looks straight forward. After the transfer I just restart aperature and help it find the library.
    But here is the question. I would like to bring my laptop on trips, take pictures, manipulate them in aperture. Then when I get home I would like to put those photos into the external drive.
    I am confused about how to do that?

    Bob,
    I am currently using MacBook Pro 2.4 GHz with 4 GB DDR2.
    Since day one I have used an external portable hard drive that has all images stored on it.
    No images are stored on the MacBook.
    Currently I am using a portable LaCie 250 GB running with Firewire 800.
    Nearly 10,000 images at the present time.
    Use a USB 500 GB portable external hard drive for the Vault (backup).
    Have had no problems working this way.
    I am looking to purchase a larger portable LaCie (500 GB) soon.
    Stu

  • How to use iMovie with Aperture Library from an external drive?

    Hey,
    Some problems:
    1. My first video, I stored the project on my own laptop and used the library from the HD. This seems to give some problems, but I now figured out I have to consolidate the media etc. so now my files don't get missing after unplugging the harddrive. I figured it would be a better idea to make all new projects on the HD, so I have everything in place all the time. BUT. look at the picture: there seems to be something wrong with the way iMovie recognizes the aperture library: i'ts not listed in the events library under the HardDisk (named Passport) but under my own drive... ??? (+ I don't understand the idea of events when I have my aperture library: Do I need to make events for all projects I make? how is this possible when the library is not in the correct position?)
    2. I made a movie, but I'm unable to export a large/high quality version of this project. That's why I want to move my project to the HD and then open it on my partners Mac Book Pro to make a good export. Unfortunately, his macbook doesn't recognize the files and the files can't be opened in iMovie... (files stay gray and unclickable)
    To sum it all up:
    I want the best way to work with this set-up: mac book air, external drive with all my files and iMovie.  And I want to be able to open the project on a different computer to make high quality exports.

    First thing that comes up with videos in your 'picture' library is the videos are always under the full control of the picture library program. Which means Aperture is the keeper and master, and it decides what will be displayed in iMovie's Event Library. If Aperture is having difficulties sometimes it cannot or will not display the videos you are storing there.
    Right now, I think the problem is your Aperture Library is on the internal Mac HD, not the external. You would have to move Aperture's Library to the external HD (along with all the pictures and videos). Then try to add the videos back into a project.
    In extreme cases I have recommended moving the videos out of the picture library and re-importing them into iMovie Event folders to let iMovie manage it.

  • Using Photoshop With Aperture-Flattens Layers

    I am running into some slight issues when using Aperture 3 and Photoshop CS6.
    I have used Aperture 3 for quite some time. As part of my workflow, I use Nik Software plug-ins for quite some time. In order to fully understand the issue, it would be best to understand a bit about my workflow.
    After I go out and shoot the images, I download the images onto my internal drive so that the images are managed within the library.
    I then proceed to rate the images. When the library is imported all the photos get one star.
    I then go in and star photos that deserve a two star rating.
    With these photos I take all the two stared photos and use the NIk Define plug-in to decrease the noise of the images. After this process this outputs TIFF files that are placed into my library.
    I then make all these new TIFF files that have the noise lessened to three stars.
    Previous to my new workflow, I would go from here utilizing the NIk plug-ins and then further rating the images.
    New Workflow:
    From here I enabled Adobe Photoshop CS6 is an external editor.
    I would export the images I would want to work on in Photomatix Pro to my desktop. After using Photomatix, I would open up the file in Photoshop without importing into Aperture.
    After all my work is done in Photoshop, I would reimport the photo back into Aperture 3.
    While the file was in Aperture 3, I would reopen it in Photoshop.
    The file would show as my layers being applied but not shown. I think it was a flattened image file.
    What I would like to do:
    Be able to reopen with Photoshop photos in my Aperture library but continue preserving the layers from Photoshop.
    Would I need to save the files as PSD files in order for this to work? Any thoughts?
    Anyhow for device would be appreciated.

    leonieDF wrote:
    Aperture does not handle layers, as far as I know. If you import an image with layers, as tiff or as psd, the layers will be preserved, but not displayed with transparency, since Aperture does only handle RGB. If you export the original (master), your layers will be preserved, but if you adjust the image in Aperture and export the edited version, then the resulting file will no longer have layers, all will be flattened.
    If you Aperture only use as a database and not as editor, your approach should work, but if you want to use Aperture's editing tools and export versions, then the layers will be gone.
    Sorry to revive this old thread, but I have a follow up question on exact subject...
    I have run into the same issue and understand your explanation. I have confirmed that I can import a layered master to Aperture, its layers are preserved and if I export it later the layers are still there.
    What I am really surprised about is that if I edit in Photoshop from Aperture, the file opens up in Photoshop, but the layers are not there. Is this right or avoidable?
    Thanks

  • Using scanner with Aperture

    I have just opened Aperture for the first time and I realize that I can´t use my filmscanner (Canoscan FS4000US) with the program.
    So is this program really everything I need? Or must i purchase Photoshop as well?

    Aperture is never meant to be a Photoshop competitor. It's a great tool for raw convertion and organization, a complete raw workflow application.
    To automatically import to Aperture scanned images you can use a hot folder, which imports any image that goes into it. Check the following link for instructions:
    http://www.automator.us/aperture/example-04.html
    You can use Image Capture (inside your application folder) for scaning images, and using automator create an action to automatically import them to Aperture.
    With your scanner you probably got some scaning software and Photoshop Elements, which is more that enough for simple retouching/cleaning of your scans.

  • Using Messages with aperture

    Am in a foreign country and have been usingMessages to connect with those back home. Is it possible to use this in Apertuure so that I can send pictures too?

    Have you tried dragging an Image (or Images) from the Aperture Browser and dropping in the Messages compose field?  Works for me.
    This sends (afaik) a reduced copy of the Preview.  If you want to send a full-size file, you much first create it by exporting from Aperture.  Sending files via Messages is covered in Messaging Help.

  • How do I use iCloud with Aperture?

    I want to synchronize the photos I shoot and load on my MacBook in Aperture to my desktop iMac. I've never used iCloud, but the setup instructions says this should work for Aperture users. The instructions say:
    "Open iPhoto or Aperture and click the Photo Stream icon in the left column. Then click Turn On Photo Stream."
    Well, there is no Photo Stream icon in the left column or anywhere in my Aperture program. What am I missing? Thanks for any help.
    Maria

    Maria, have you enabled Photo Stream in the System Preferences > iCloud tab and in Aperture's Preferences?
    Does your Aperture version support iCloud? You need at least Aperture 3.2.3
    See: iCloud: Photo Stream FAQ
    Choose Apple () menu > System Preferences. Click iCloud, then select Photo Sharing.
    Turn on Photo Sharing in one of these applications:
    iPhoto: Choose iPhoto > Preferences. Click iCloud, then select Photo Sharing.
    Aperture: Choose Aperture > Preferences. Click iCloud, then select Photo Sharing.
    Léonie

  • Using Elements with Aperture?

    I recently signed up for the Elements free trial. I can see in Aperture where Elements is the external editor and can then open Elements accordingly. Problem I have is "how do I then get the picture(s) I want to edit into Elements (and, therefore, back to Aperture). At the moment the trial is a waste of my time. Does anyone have any ideas?

    To edit an image in PSE from Aperture you need to set PSE as an external editor.
    Please keep it in mind that you are selecting correct application file from Aperture preference.
    Please refer this below screen shot.
    Cheers!!!

  • How can I use EOS 6D RAW files with Aperture 3.2.4?

    The EOS 6D RAW support for Aperture requires Aperture 3.4 or later. I tried to update to Aperture 3.4 but that requires OSX 10.8.3. I am stuck with OSX 10.6.8 for a while because I use Adobe CS5.5 and it is not compatable with newer OSX. So i do not seem to have a path for 6D RAW support. I can use my EOS 20D RAW files just fine. What is it about the 6D RAW file that necessitates OSX 10.6.8 or Aperture 3.4?

    The common way is to try converting to DNG and then use the DNGs with Aperture. The drawback (other than the format conversion) is you lose camera specific optimisations with the DNG (mostly noise reduction tweaks for specific ISO values and colour tweaks).
    In the past it would have been easy to edit a few config files to get Aperture to recognise new cameras with similar sensor tech as existing cameras, but this data is now encoded so can't be changed. It is a bit frustrating when you know there is nothing special about the sensor and Aperture would be able to process the data just fine.
    Andy

  • Re:  Leone's post May 2014 about how to best use an external drive with Aperture

    I am trying to find Leone who had a great post May 2014 to Diane. I posted tho same message as a 'Reply' to the Leone/Diane posts but then was worried it would not show up since that was some time ago so I decided I should post it as new.  Apologies if it comes through twice.   I am having trouble as indicated below:
    I found this response to the question about Aperture and external hard drives from last May.  I bought a WD My Book 4TB and need to back up photos I have in Aperture (many!) to free up space.  I am a photographer and need to be able to plug the external drive in as needed, pull a photo out from the WD and back into Aperture to work on it if needed.
    I read your directions to Diane and have the external drive formatted Mac OS Extended (Journaled).  I read the two ways you suggest to move part or all of my library to an external drive and still be able to use it in Aperture with all the metadata saved, as I need to continue to work with the images.  I am not completely clear about the advantage of the 'referenced' method but decided to go with the Split Library because it sounded like the Referenced method would still keep originals (and take space) in Aperture.  I'm not sure about this, but that was what I chose.
    I have backed up my computer, formatted the drive then went to Aperture to begin.  I do the 'Export' and it shows the external drive it will go to but when I click 'OK', it says "EXPORT LIBRARY FAILED - Library could not be create because the file system of the destination volume is not supported."  I doubled checked to be sure the drive was Journaled which it was.  I did call WD and talk to them but they told me this was outside their area.
    Also, in Aperture, I have my photos in Projects by yymmdd.  Is it possible to transfer Projects into the ext. drive without having to break them out of the Projects?
    Any direction anyone might give would be greatly appreciated, Sandy

    Hi Sandy,
    I suggest taking a week or two to get to know Aperture better before proceeding.  Aperture can do many things, and can do what you want.  It's important to be specific about what you want, however.  From what you've said, it appears that you don't yet know.
    bybeeler wrote:
    [1] I found this response to the question about Aperture and external hard drives from last May.  I bought a WD My Book 4TB and need to back up photos I have in Aperture (many!) to free up space.
    [2] I am a photographer and need to be able to plug the external drive in as needed, pull a photo out from the WD and back into Aperture to work on it if needed.
    [1] A back-up is a copy of digital files stores on a separate device.  A back-up is recommended because drives fail, and humans make mistakes.  A back-up is not used to free up storage space.
    [2] Aperture can be set up in many equally-usable ways.  The program files reside (almost always) on your system drive.  The data files can be anywhere you want them, as long as they are on locally-mounted drive(s).  The main data file is your Library.  The best place for it is on the drive that has the fastest throughput to your logic board.  This is, in nearly 100% of machines, the system drive.  But Aperture functions well with Libraries of secondary drives — internal or external — with sufficient throughput.  USB-3 and Thunderbolt I (& II) provide sufficient throughput for using an Aperture Library on a secondary drive.
    Nearly all photographers will fill whatever storage space is available (making data is what photographers do).  The question is: what do you do when your Library no longer fits on your system drive?  (And remember, you should leave at least 10% (I recommend 20% for heavy users of Aperture) of your system drive free.)  The answer depends, primarily, on whether your computer is portable or fixed in location. 
    If fixed, just buy a more-than-large-enough secondary drive of USB-3 or faster throughput, mount it permanently, and move (using Finder) your Library to it.
    If your computer is portable (and you can't increase the on-board storage), you have to select the best from several confusing alternatives:
    • Put your Library on an external drive with throughput at least as fast as USB-3
    — Pros:  Easy to maintain and back-up.
    — Cons:  Must have drive with you in order to use your Library.
    • Leave your Library on your system drive, but relocate your Images' Originals to an external drive.
    — Pros:  You can work on your Library without having the external drive available.
    — Cons:  You can't export (except Previews), Print, or make adjustments until your external drive is mounted.  Significantly more difficult to administer, especially importing and backing-up.
    • Leave your Library and and _some_ of your Images' Originals on your system drive, and relocate most of your Image's Originals to an external drive.
    — Pros: You can do any work on those Images whose Originals are stored in the Library regardless of where the external drive is.
    — Cons: Yet another level more difficult to administer.
    If you are comfortable with the administrative overhead, the third set-up will be the most rewarding.  Keep all _current_ Images Originals inside your Library, and routinely relocate the Originals of Images no longer current to the external drive.
    In no case is it recommended that you at any time remove from your Library an Image (not the Original — the Image in Aperture) that you expect to ever use again.
    HTH,
    —Kirby.

  • HT201070 I currently use OS 10.6.8 and Aperture 3, and just got a Nikon D600. It seems the the RAW Compatibility updates (4.01) are for use only with OS 10.7.5 or later, is that right? Do I need to update my whole OS to use this camera? Thank you!

    I currently use OS 10.6.8 and Aperture 3, and just got a Nikon D600. It seems the the RAW Compatibility updates (4.01) are for use only with OS 10.7.5 or later, is that right? Do I need to update my whole OS to use this camera? Thank you!

    Thanks to Bobthefisherman & Turbostar.  Turns out I've got a corrupted disk (which I found out via "verify disk" on Disk Utility First Aid.  Previously, I never thought to verify disk -- only to repair permissions -- so I never knew my HD had been corrupted.
    Wasn't able to do a clean install of OSX10.6 because my SuperDrive only sporadically will load discs, so I am taking it to the Apple Store to see if they can do a clean install, and depending upon costs, get the Superdrive replaced. 
    The HD wasn't partioned by the way.  And I did have just over 40GB of contiguous space. 
    Thanks again.

  • Using Places in iPhoto with aperture photos

    If we have a picture in aperture with the City and Country Name attribute filleds, this picture in iphoto will not have the info. So, iPhoto no uses the EXIF City and Country Name fields.
    are there any solution to use the exif info filled in apeture with Places in iPhoto?
    Thanks.

    I am not familiar with Aperture so I don't know what it can do or if any helper programs/plug ins will do with Aperture.
    However there are other Geotagging programs out there. One that is very easy to use in conjunction with Google Earth is Graphics Connverter. With GC, you can open Google Earth, find the location of you want to tag your photo with, then switch over to GC and use the menu item to geotag the selected photos (you can do many photos at once) with the currently displayed Google Earth location. In addition there is a menu command to simply type in coordinates if you do not want to use Google Earth. GC can also tag using GPS data logger files.
    GC will write the coordinates to the EXIF data and I have done it myself on both normal JPGs as well as Olympus RAW format. I know when I geotag with GC and then add the photos to iPhoto, iPhoto sees the tags just fine and show their locations. I assume Aperture would do the same.
    iPhoto can tag photos as well, but it only writes the data to the database and doesn't actually add the info to the EXIF of the photos themselves until you export the photos out of iPhoto. Do to do it with iPhoto is a multi step process that would require adding them to iPhoto, tagging them, then exporting them back out of iPhoto. I think CG would be an easier solution.
    Patrick

Maybe you are looking for