Using Frames in Muse?

Can I use a Frames system to "see" images or pages that are outside the site?
I have an 88cm long image. I want to place that on another page and make just a "window" onto it so I can scroll the image. Can I do this?
Thanks!

Hi Steve!
MuseGrid has very handy and cheap iFrame widget. Here is the link http://www.musegrid.com/adobe-muse-widgets/iframe-builder-pro
Best Regards
TaikaJim

Similar Messages

  • Is it possible to partially export a video using frame blending?

    For example, I have a video intro that, after being uploaded and processed on YouTube, looks very choppy. However, if I export it using frame blending, it looks perfectly fine. The down side is that the rest of the video looks somewhat more blurry, as frame blending tends to do. I like how fluid the intro is when frame blended, but I perfer the rest of the video when it's just exported normally. I found an option called frame blend under the clip's video options, making me think that I could fix my problem, but it didn't seem like it did anything at all when I exported it. Is what I'm trying to achieve actually possible, or will I just have to deal with it, one way or the other?

    1.  I export in H.264 with the preset HDTV 720p 29.97 fps High Quality. I would use the YouTube preset, but it compresses the audio to a point where it sounds terrible. I'm sure there's a way to fix this, but I don't know enough about it to do so myself.
    2.  My sequence also runs at 29.97 fps.
    3. The intro consists of several game capture clips all .avi at what I think is 29 fps. Many of the clips are sped up to at least 200%.

  • Using Frames in HtmlB.

    Hai All,
    I have created a JspDynPage component. In my Jsp file , i have used <frames> tag. But nothing is dispalyed on the iView.
    I need to know whether we can use <frames> tag inside htmlB.
    <%@ taglib uri= "tagLib" prefix="hbj" %>
    <hbj:content   id="myContext">
    <hbj:page      title="PageTitle">
    <hbj:form        id="myFormId">
    <frameset rows="64,*,64">
      <frame name="top" scrolling="no" noresize src="top.jsp">
    <frameset cols="150,*">
        <frame name="contents" target="main" src="MenuContent.jsp">
        <frame name="main">
    </frameset>
      <frame name="bottom" scrolling="no" noresize src="foot.jsp">
    </frameset>
    </hbj:form>
    </hbj:page>
    </hbj:content>
    Regards,
    Eben

    Hi Eben,
    there is an HTMLB element for iFrames. It is called <a href="https://media.sdn.sap.com/javadocs/NW04s/SPS7/hb/com/sapportals/htmlb/htmlcontainer/IsolatedHtmlContainer.html">IsolatedHtmlContainer</a>. Have a look into it.
    Perhaps it might solve your problems.
    Best Regards,
    Martin

  • Firefox 4 is not saving pages (using frames) I visit in the history list, but Firefox 3 does. What could be wrong (may be related to no-cache)?

    When using FF 3, I can go back through the history using the arrows on the toolbar. When using FF4, I can't. This applies to an internal site where the page uses frames and the header pragma "no-cache". This also happens in safe mode.

    thom
    I was reading the above post about typing in code to darwin, i have a similar problemWell,posting all that isn't necessary, and disguises your new post. I take it you mean you typed in the tail command and saw those messages?
    localhost launchd:server 3d27 in bootstrap 1103 uid 0: "/usr/sbin/lookupd"[47]: exited abnormally: HangupDespite the word "abnormally", this is in fact normal and recurs frequently. The lookupd process is told to "hang up", i.e. quit, when it is done, and will restart as necessary.
    I don't know what the "initcardwithstoreprefs failed" means: you need to set it in context of the other messages. But the main purpose of using the tail command is to look for "loginwindow exited" messages, and then see what came before them.
    So, give a bit more detail about your problem: for a start, on which of your machines is this happening? Have you tried disconnecting any USB devices except for mouse and keyboard? In fact, give a lot more detail

  • Can I create a "stage" in Animate and use it in Muse to create a responsive site?

    I want to use Muse to build my site and Animate for some elements. I need a responsive site. Muse does not do that but Animate does. That is crazy! How can I combine them? There has got to be a way. Someone smarter than I has figured it out I am sure, I am hoping they chime in.
    Can I create the "stage" in Animate and use it in Muse?

    You are probably right but I was looking for the ease in creating only one and letting it do the work.
    Now that I think about it....my site will have video embedded and a link for Ustream. That won't work on a mobile device if it is part of a responsive design will it?
    Oh, there is soooo much to all of this!
    Newbie anxiety!
    This is why I chose Muse and Animate, I am too new to code it on my own.

  • Mixed AS Versions using frames

    I have a site with two frames. Is it possible to load one
    HTML document in one frame that contains an SWF published using AS
    2.0 and another HTML document into the other frame that contains an
    SWF published in AS 3.0?
    I am not sure how this works in a browser that has the Flash
    Player version 9 installed - can it handle both versions
    concurrently if they are in different HTML doc and frames?

    SymTsb - thanks for the response!
    I guess I am just not sure exactly "how" the Flash Player
    Plugin actually works inside a browser. I know the FlashPlayer9
    will play EITHER an SWF saved using AS2.0 or AS3.0, but never
    considered how it handled "mixed" versions. So I guess what you are
    saying is that even without using "frames", if I were to link two
    separate SWFs within the same HTML page that one could use AS3 and
    the other AS2 and they would co-exist - is that right? If so, will
    the AS2 SWF slow down the play performance of the AS3 SWF or are
    they handled totally separate by the Player?

  • Should I use frames or what?

    Here is my dilema. I'm working on a pretty big site. The site
    has about 8
    sections each which have about 10 subsections. I basically
    created 8 pages
    total for all of the subsections but I don't want to have to
    create hundreds
    of pages for all the subsections so since all the pages look
    exactly
    identical in the subsections is there a way I could just make
    it so the only
    content that changes when you go to one of the subsections is
    the main
    content table? I'm assuming to do this I would need to use
    frames unless
    there is another way I don't know of yet? Anyone got any
    pointers?
    Best Regards,
    Chris Jumonville
    503.277.3553

    Chris Jumonville wrote:
    > Here is my dilema. I'm working on a pretty big site. The
    site has about 8
    > sections each which have about 10 subsections. I
    basically created 8 pages
    > total for all of the subsections but I don't want to
    have to create hundreds
    > of pages for all the subsections so since all the pages
    look exactly
    > identical in the subsections is there a way I could just
    make it so the only
    > content that changes when you go to one of the
    subsections is the main
    > content table? I'm assuming to do this I would need to
    use frames unless
    > there is another way I don't know of yet? Anyone got any
    pointers?
    Frames wouldn't alleviate the need to create the many pages.
    You'd still
    need a seprate file for each page within each subsection.
    What you're looking for is some manner of server technology -
    be it ASP,
    PHP, etc. - that allows you to utilize a template for the
    page, and load
    in only the content specific to the topic.
    *** Remove the DELETE from my address to reply ***
    ======================================================
    Kevin Scholl
    http://www.ksscholl.com/
    [email protected]
    Information Architecture, Web Design and Development
    We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of
    the dreams...
    ======================================================

  • Using Form in muse site

    I have a muse site that is not hosted on the adobe business catalyst so the form widget doesn't work for me.
    I was wondering -- Could I develop a acrobat form for a webpage and would it export okay from my muse file
    to html file and then I could upload to my hosted account?   If so, would the configurations set up in the acrobat
    form stay in tack on the export to html or would I need to code or configure for my hosted site?

    Hello,
    You need to get the Embed code from Jotforms and yoo can insert the Emed code by clicking on Object>Insert HTML in Muse. NAd in the Edit HTML Window you can insert the HTML code you get from Jotforms.
    To get the Embed code from Jotforms, you need to click  on Setup and Embed tab at the top of the form in Jotforms and then click on Embed form button at the top in the toolbar.
    From the window that comes up, you can get the Embed code and use  it in Muse.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Sachin

  • Using Frames in JSF

    Can anyone provide an example on how to use frames inside JSF? I don't know how to define the framesets inside the jsf file. A simple example will go a long way. Thanks.

    Nope, I'm not big on samples, especially of code I've never tried to write. Give it a try, if you have a problem post your code and we'll take a look.

  • Using frames in HtmlDB page

    hi all
    can you please help me with how to use frames in an htmldb page with a tabset .
    i have a page in one tabset application i want to divide the page into frame and run a url in one of these frames
    thanks

    The performance of your pages are dependent on many factors. Just adding a tab should not have an impact on performance.
    Regards,
    Jerry
    PortalPM

  • Paste doesn't work on IPad, on sites that use frames

    I work for MindBody Inc. and a client of ours brought to my attention that paste simply doesn't paste on our site. This is quite annoying for them, and in trying to find a fix, I discovered that a fairly moderate bug in Safari on the IPad. Paste just simply doesn't work in frames.
    Does anyone know how I would go about submitting a bug to Apple?
    The test:
    I've created the following test
    frameTest.html
    <html>
    <head>
    <title>Iphone frame test</title>
    </head>
    <frameset id="mainFrameset" rows="98,*" frameborder="0" framespacing="0" NORESIZE>
    <frame name="topFrame" src="brianTest.html" frameborder="0" noresize scrolling="NO" >
    <frame name="mainFrame" src="brianTest.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="YES">
    </frameset>
    </html>
    brianTest.html:
    <html>
    <head>
    <title>Testing IPad Paste</title>
    </head>
    <body>
    Testing: <input type="text" name="test" />
    </body>
    </html>
    When browsing the frameTest.html paste doesn't work. It shows up but clicking it pastes nothing.
    Going to brianTest.html, paste works as expected.

    Same problem with Atomic Web Browser on the websites using frames.
    All the "identify web browser as" options have been tested, unsuccessfully.
    It seems that the new iPad 4.2 iOS version solves the problem. I will test it on monday and post the results here. Stay tuned, or check it by yourself...
    Message was edited by: Yoda65

  • CAN periodic transmit message with different modes using Frame API's

    I want to transmit a CAN message periodically using Frame API's. I am able to send messages which dont have modes inside the message. For some messages having multiplexer in ".ncd " files and inside that multiplexer having different modes. Now in order to send all the modes of that message periodically by configuring them once by using Frame API's i did not  find a way. I am able to send messages but the last updated mode is only sent periodically. Is there any way that CAN message having different modes can be sent periodically, updating all modes periodically automatically using Frame API's.

    Hello Kpraveen,
    You could set the period for N*Period, N being the number of modes.  You just need to make sure your application changes the modes fast enough to update each periodic frame.
    For example, say you have 2 modes and the frame's period should be 10ms.  That means that you would like that frame to go out twice every 10ms, updating mode 1 and then mode 2.  So, that means that the frames period can be 5ms. 
    1.  It will start by updating mode1
    2.  5ms later, it will update mode2
    3.  5ms later it will update mode1 again
    mode 1 really has a  period of 10ms...
    You just have to make sure that you can update the frame fast enough, or switch between modes fast enough, or you will send the same mode twice.
    Let me know if this helps, or if I an not understanding this properly.  Have a great day.
    O. Proulx
    National Instruments
    www.ni.com/support

  • Can we use frames and jsps together..

    Is it good to use frames with jsps.performence wise..bcos when iam calling jsps in frames it taking more time..to laod..
    regards,

    Remember, 2 frames == 2 HTTP requests. 3 frames == 3 requests, etc.
    It will take longer of course. To think otherwise is crazy. However there are times when the benefits are there. I've used them, expecially if it's a situation where taking a little longer on the initial load makes all other accesses faster. This is particularly the case when I've got a fancy UI that uses lots of graphics. I don't need to load the graphics more than once so I put them in separate frames and only have one frame (which is mostly text) change content.

  • Can Wowslider effects be use in Adobe Muse?

    Can Wowslider effects be use in Adobe Muse?

    Hi Stewart,
    Please refer to the following link http://forums.adobe.com/message/5250998#5250998
    Regards,
    Aish

  • Must I use frames for this?

    I have some external links that I'd like to keep within a
    site versus opening a new browser window (for branding purposes).
    Do I need to set up a page with frames to essentially bring those
    sites into my main content area?
    Thanks!
    Eric

    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
    --------------050207030400080007010702
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    sorry, i left this part out of my last message, and just
    wanted to
    mention that i'm aware of the page history button next to the
    back
    button that allows you to choose which page to go back to,
    and use it
    often. but many people do not know about that handy option,
    and would
    instead just keep clicking the button until they get back to
    where they
    want to be.
    that's all!
    courtney (n h c) wrote:
    > sorry, but i disagree. what if the visitor is taken to
    the other site
    > and starts clicking around in that site? then they have
    to click the
    > back button who knows how many times to get back to the
    page they were
    > on to begin with. i, personally, would much rather just
    have to click
    > the close button once on the new tab or window, than
    click "back"
    > however many times it takes me to back to the original
    page.
    > obviously, everyone has their own preferences, but i'm
    gonna have to
    > go with one click over several on this one. not to
    mention, what if
    > the new site has some kind of form on it that they fill
    out? i doubt i
    > have to tell you what happens with a lot of forms when
    you try to
    > click back to where you were before the form.
    >
    > also, what if the visitor gets caught up in the new
    website and
    > forgets where they started in the first place? the back
    button won't
    > help then. they're just gone. and my company has lost a
    potential
    > customer. but if the new site is in a different tab or
    window, when
    > they close it they'll see my site again, and be all
    like, "oh yeah! i
    > was looking at this site before. guess i'll look at it
    some more."
    >
    > i guess i'm not so worried about people who don't notice
    when a new
    > window or tab is opening. it's fairly obvious when that
    happens. and
    > if it's that much of a concern, you can add an alert
    pop-up that lets
    > them know the link is opening a new window. i have a
    link on one of
    > the websites i work on that has an alert that says
    something like
    > "this link is opening a different website in a new
    window. close that
    > window to return to this site." i did this because
    having it open in
    > the same window was confusing people. they thought the
    new site was
    > part of ours.
    >
    > i'd be interested in other people's thoughts on this.
    >
    > Michael Fesser wrote:
    >> .oO(courtney (n h c))
    >>
    >>
    >>> yeah, that would probably be the only way to do
    it. but i'd recommend
    >>> just opening them in a new window. i've done it
    with frames before, and
    >>> it just doesn't work well. you're basically
    trying to fit one website
    >>> into another, and it generally looks horrible
    (not to mention the
    >>> various drawbacks involved in using frames in
    general). i understand the
    >>> desire to keep people on your site, but you can
    achieve that by having
    >>> the links open in a new window/tab, because your
    site will still be
    >>> there when the visitor closes the new
    window/tab.
    >>>
    >>
    >> It's an illusion that you can keep visitors on your
    own site if you open
    >> external links in a new window. People know how to
    use a "back" button -
    >> it's the second-most used function in a browser. New
    windows/tabs might
    >> even be confusing, because they break(!) this
    important function.
    >>
    >> Frames and the 'target' attribute are not allowed in
    all strict (X)HTML
    >> standards for good reasons. It's best to simply link
    to the other site,
    >> without trying to mess with how or where the browser
    will display it.
    >> Let the browser and the user decide such things.
    >>
    >> <a href="
    http://example.com">another
    site</a>
    >>
    >> That's it. Can't get easier.
    >>
    >> Micha
    >>
    --------------050207030400080007010702
    Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
    Transitional//EN">
    <html>
    <head>
    <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"
    http-equiv="Content-Type">
    </head>
    <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    sorry, i left this part out of my last message, and just
    wanted to
    mention that i'm aware of the page history button next to the
    back
    button that allows you to choose which page to go back to,
    and use it
    often. but many people do not know about that handy option,
    and would
    instead just keep clicking the button until they get back to
    where they
    want to be.<br>
    <br>
    that's all!<br>
    <br>
    courtney (n h c) wrote:
    <blockquote cite="mid:[email protected]"
    type="cite">
    <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"
    http-equiv="Content-Type">
    <title></title>
    sorry, but i disagree. what if the visitor is taken to the
    other site
    and starts clicking around in that site? then they have to
    click the
    back button who knows how many times to get back to the page
    they were
    on to begin with. i, personally, would much rather just have
    to click
    the close button once on the new tab or window, than click
    "back"
    however many times it takes me to back to the original page.
    obviously,
    everyone has their own preferences, but i'm gonna have to go
    with one
    click over several on this one. not to mention, what if the
    new site
    has some kind of form on it that they fill out? i doubt i
    have to tell
    you what happens with a lot of forms when you try to click
    back to
    where you were before the form.<br>
    <br>
    also, what if the visitor gets caught up in the new website
    and forgets
    where they started in the first place? the back button won't
    help then.
    they're just gone. and my company has lost a potential
    customer. but if
    the new site is in a different tab or window, when they close
    it
    they'll see my site again, and be all like, "oh yeah! i was
    looking at
    this site before. guess i'll look at it some more."<br>
    <br>
    i guess i'm not so worried about people who don't notice when
    a new
    window or tab is opening. it's fairly obvious when that
    happens. and if
    it's that much of a concern, you can add an alert pop-up that
    lets them
    know the link is opening a new window. i have a link on one
    of the
    websites i work on that has an alert that says something like
    "this
    link is opening a different website in a new window. close
    that window
    to return to this site." i did this because having it open in
    the same
    window was confusing people. they thought the new site was
    part of
    ours. <br>
    <br>
    i'd be interested in other people's thoughts on
    this.<br>
    <br>
    Michael Fesser wrote:
    <blockquote
    cite="mid:[email protected]"
    type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">.oO(courtney (n h c))
    </pre>
    <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">yeah, that would probably be the only way
    to do it. but i'd recommend
    just opening them in a new window. i've done it with frames
    before, and
    it just doesn't work well. you're basically trying to fit one
    website
    into another, and it generally looks horrible (not to mention
    the
    various drawbacks involved in using frames in general). i
    understand the
    desire to keep people on your site, but you can achieve that
    by having
    the links open in a new window/tab, because your site will
    still be
    there when the visitor closes the new window/tab.
    </pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre wrap=""><!---->
    It's an illusion that you can keep visitors on your own site
    if you open
    external links in a new window. People know how to use a
    "back" button -
    it's the second-most used function in a browser. New
    windows/tabs might
    even be confusing, because they break(!) this important
    function.
    Frames and the 'target' attribute are not allowed in all
    strict (X)HTML
    standards for good reasons. It's best to simply link to the
    other site,
    without trying to mess with how or where the browser will
    display it.
    Let the browser and the user decide such things.
    &lt;a href=<a moz-do-not-send="true"
    class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
    href="
    http://example.com">"http://example.com"</a>&gt;another
    site&lt;/a&gt;
    That's it. Can't get easier.
    Micha
    </pre>
    </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    </body>
    </html>
    --------------050207030400080007010702--

Maybe you are looking for

  • Enabling the save button

    I was having a problem with an unbound item where if a user entered data into it and wanted to save, the save button on the menu was disabled. To get around this problem I created a post-change trigger for the unbound item where I used the set_menu_i

  • I cant get my playlists to sync to iphone and when i connect and clIck on iphone device, the music folder doesnt reflect content of phone.

    I cant sync playlists with phone.  and when device connected, the music folder under devices reflects a music library which doesnt reflect itunes music content or conten4t of phone ive done all i can think of and more

  • Photoshop 7.0 installer problems

    I am trying to install my Photoshop 7.0 that I just purchased. When I click the Photoshop 7.0 icon, a window pops up titled "Adobe Photoshop" and reads "One or more files in the Adobe Application Support folder, necessary for running Photoshop under

  • Lost in the upgrade

    I lost my books with the new app upgrade. I also forgot my sign in and had to do it all over. How do I get back my books  in the new app?

  • GK supports Accounting ?

    Hi All, Our company is the ITSP. Currently we are planning provide long distance calls using IP Phones like ATA 186. We have a 3640 router with GK feature. But we don't have the voice gateways. My questions are follows. 1.) The gatekeeper supports Ac