Using isetup for source and target instace being same.

Can we use isetup to create a replica of existing operating unit and the modules connected with it?
Ahmed,

Yes, Yes. Very much. You can have a look at 'Financials Operating Unit Level Setup' selection set to achieve what you are looking for. Here is the step to do:
1) Create an Extract using 'Financials Operating Unit Level Setup' selection setFinancials Operating Unit Level Setup' selection set
2) After successful completion of Extract, transform the Extract using Transform module. During transform you can change the Operating Unit name.
3) Load the Transform to same instance.
Make sure that you have all mandatory patches applied on your instances. I have documented the required patches on each release in the announcement section.
Thanks
Mugunthan.

Similar Messages

  • Single Code Page Unicode conversion when source and target are the same

    Hi everyone.  We have recently upgraded our non-unicode 4.7 to ECC6 non-unicode.  Now we have begun researching the next step to convert to Unicode.  I know we could have done the Combined Upgrade and Unicode Conversion but I wanted to do thorough testing after the upgrade to eliminate too many variables if problems arose.
    So, my question is...has anyone done the Unicode conversion when source and target servers are the same?  Most documentation I've seen recommends a system copy to another box first.  I did find one forum thread that gave a high level approach to doing the conversion with just one server and listed this:
    Step 1:- Run Tcode SPUMG to scan
    Step 2:- Export Database
    Step 3:- Drop Database
    Step 4:- Create New Database
    Step 5:- Import database
    Step 6:- Chnage unicode Kernel
    What are your thoughts?  Is it supported?  Am I wasting my time and should I just bite the bullet and buy yet another system?  Thanks in advance.
    -Anthony

    Theoretically that's possible, yes. However...
    > Step 5:- Import database
    > Step 6:- Chnage unicode Kernel
    the import must be done using the Unicode kernel.
    So basically you can
    - export the old systm
    - uninstall system + database
    - start as if you were installing "from scratch" on a new box
    Markus

  • How to create Same file names for source and target.

    hi
    Can any body send Procedure for below requirement.
    how to create the dynamic file names for a source and save the file with same name in the Target, because it has to identify that which sender had sent the file and the target file should be again sent back to the customer as a link.
    Please help me.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    See the below link
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/11/10/xi-the-same-filename-from-a-sender-to-a-receiver-file-adapter--sp14 - sender file name as receiver file name
    Regards
    Chilla

  • Expdp with network_link and different character sets for source and target?

    DB versions 10.2 and 10.1
    Is there any limitation for implementing expdp with network_link but target and source have different character sets?
    I tried with many combinations, but only had success when target and source have the same character sets. In other combinations there was invalid character set conversion (loose of some characters in VARCHAR2 and CLOB fields).
    I didn't find anything on the internet, forums or Oracle documentation. There was only limitation for transportable tablespace mode export (Database Utilities).
    Thanks

    Hi DBA-One
    This link
    http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14215/dp_overview.htm#CEGFCFFI
    is from Database Utilities 10g Release 2 (10.2) (I read it many times)
    There is only one thing about different character sets.
    I quote:
    Data Pump supports character set conversion for both direct path and external tables. Most of the restrictions that exist for character set conversions in the original Import utility do not apply to Data Pump. The one case in which character set conversions are not supported under the Data Pump is when using transportable tablespaces.
    Parameter VERSION also doesn't play role here, because the behaviour (character set) is the same if I use for target and source only 10.2 or (10.2 and 10.1) respectivly.

  • Char length for source and target

    Hi
    i am getting vbeln firsr length is 20.  now i need map 0doc_number, this length is getting 18. how can i decrease lenthg of this object.can i write any code?
    regards
    suneel.

    You have two options ---
    1. Reduce the length while passing the data through UR/TR/Transformation by writing field routine.
    (This will be applicable only to your data model)
    2. Write Transfer Routine at InfoObject Level.
    (This is applicable globally wherever 0doc_number infoobject is used.)

  • I have on;y one audio port can i use it for input and output at the same time?

    i have the new macbook pro 13 in and i want to connect aguitar as input and output on an amp but i have only one audio port

    You can't use the jack as an input and output simultaneously. The solution is to look for a USB or Firewire interface to get your guitar sound into the computer.

  • Using iTunes for iPhone and iTouch at the same time

    Sorry if this has been asked before guys but im due to recieve an iPhone tomorrow and i already have an iTouch which i will give to my wife. Is it possible to have 2 devices like this running from the one iTunes installation?
    I presume all the music, photo's etc will just appear exactly the same on both devices?

    Click here for information.
    (46710)

  • No mapping for Same structure in source and target

    Hi Experts,
    I want to transfer the source structure to two receivers . Here source and target structures are same so i dont need mapping.
    My question is how many DT,MT and MI required .. mapping required or not.
    Thanks in Advance
    CS

    hi  CS,
                 here in  your  scenario as  u  have  told  that  source  and reciver  are of  same  structure . definitely you didn't need  any  mapping . and you have to create two data type(one for sender and  one for receiver) , two message  types(one for sender and one for receiver)) , and  two message  interfaces(one for sender and one for receiver).
    while creating message types it asks for data  type and while creating message interface it asks for message type only . as the structures of sender and receiver are same then inspite of having two receivers  we  have to create  ony one message interface on sender side . later the adapter will take  care of further proceedings
    but  in  case of configuration you have to import three business systems . one for sender and  two for receiver systems . and  you have to configure the communications  channels  accordingly. as per the receivers accepting the structures you have to use the relevant adaptors .

  • HOWTO set source and target in WTK KToolbar

    I am having trouble getting my MIDlet compiled when pressing the Build button in the WTK's KToolbar. I get the following error:
    generics are not supported in -source 1.3
    This is because I have JDK 1.6 installed and I'm trying to use a Vector in my code that is typed.
    How do I configure the javac settings through the KToolbar so it uses the javac -source and -target arguments?
    Thanks.

    The thing is like
    while practicing in my institute I had used "//ECCserver/SAPMNT" as path for both sender and reciever communication channels...
    now i'm unable to write the path for both
    please help me out

  • Parametrized relation connections - don't work when source and target are different

    Hi All,I have next problem:I am using parametrized relation connection firstConnection (user and (encripted)password are taken from parameter file). Here are values from param file: $DBConnection_source=firstConnection$DBConnection_source=firstConnection$ParamUser=svaba$ParamPwd=Dni32iRiH0Yjro1U04+RTC==  This is (source and target are same) working fine for years.
     But now I need two different connection, i.e. source is (existing)   firstConnection and target is secondConnection. On both instances I have  same user 
      (svaba) with same password. I created second parameterized connection with  user = $ParamUser    and password = $ParamPwd     Now, parameters are: $DBConnection_source=firstConnection$DBConnection_source=secondConnection$ParamUser=svaba$ParamPwd=Dni32iRiH0Yjro1U04+RTC== When run workflow, got error: ORA-01005: null password given: logon denied.I triede to change connections by entering values for password (not use parameters for password) got error: ORA-01017:invalid username/password:logon denied.When I am using same (parametrized) connection for source and target (any of these two) everything is fine. That is sign that connections are good. Does someone have any idea about this problem

    Hi All,I have next problem:I am using parametrized relation connection firstConnection (user and (encripted)password are taken from parameter file). Here are values from param file: $DBConnection_source=firstConnection$DBConnection_source=firstConnection$ParamUser=svaba$ParamPwd=Dni32iRiH0Yjro1U04+RTC==  This is (source and target are same) working fine for years.
     But now I need two different connection, i.e. source is (existing)   firstConnection and target is secondConnection. On both instances I have  same user 
      (svaba) with same password. I created second parameterized connection with  user = $ParamUser    and password = $ParamPwd     Now, parameters are: $DBConnection_source=firstConnection$DBConnection_source=secondConnection$ParamUser=svaba$ParamPwd=Dni32iRiH0Yjro1U04+RTC== When run workflow, got error: ORA-01005: null password given: logon denied.I triede to change connections by entering values for password (not use parameters for password) got error: ORA-01017:invalid username/password:logon denied.When I am using same (parametrized) connection for source and target (any of these two) everything is fine. That is sign that connections are good. Does someone have any idea about this problem

  • OWB 10g -- Can't Create Database Links for Data Source and Target

    We installed OWB 10g server components on a Unix box running Oracle 10g (R2) database. The Designer Repository is in one instance. The Runtime Repository and the Target are in another instance. The OWB client component was installed on Windows XP. We create a data source module and a target module in OWB. The data source is on another Unix box running Oracle 9i (R2) database. We try to create database links for data source module and target module, respective. But when we created and tested the DB links, the DB links were failed.
    For the database link of data source, we got the following error message:
    Testing...
    Failed.
    SQL Exception
    Repository Error:SQL Exception..
    Class Name: CacheMediator.
    Method Name: getDDEntryFromDB.
    Repository Error Message: ORA-12170: TNS:Connect timeout occurred
    For the database link of target , we got the following error message:
    Testing...
    Failed.
    API2215: Cannot create database link. Please contact Oracle Support with the stack trace and the details on how to reproduce it.
    Repository Error:SQL Exception..
    Class Name: oracle.wh.ui.integrator.common.RepositoryUtils.
    Method Name: createDBLink(String, String, String, String).
    Method Name: -1.
    Repository Error Message: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended.
    However, we could connect to the two databases (data source and target) using the OWB’s utility SQL Plus.
    Please help us to solve this problem. Thank you.

    As I said prior the database link creation should work from within the OWB client (also in 10).
    Regarding your issue when deploying, have you registered your target locations in the deployment manager and did you first deployed your target location's connector which points out to your source?
    I myself had some problems with database link creations in the past and I can't remember exactly what they were but it had something to do with
    - the use of abnormal characters in the database link name
    - long domain name used in as names.default_domain in my sqlnet.ora file
    What you can do is check the actual script created when deploying the database link so see if there's something strange and check if executing the created script manually works or not.

  • Any Best Practices (i.e. DOs and Don'ts) for source to target MAPPINGs?

    Hi Experts,
    Any Best Practices (i.e. DOs and Don'ts) for source to target MAPPINGs?
    I will appreciate any hints on this.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I am assuming that you are asking about transformation mapping between source and target..
    1) One to One mapping
    2)Avoid using complex calculations
    3) if any calculations required use routine instead of formulas
    4)if possible avoid Using field routine (you can do start or end routine )
    5)Do not map unwanted fields ( unnecessary process time,database occupant, also problem while activation of DSO data )
    6)Avoid using master data read mapping option instead you can use routine to fetch the master data
    7) no need of using  infosurce
    8)Use standard time conversions for time fields
    Generally these things we need to consider while mapping..
    Regards,
    Satya

  • Release notes for 2.16 states that there was a fix for alerts not being modal. We are using 3.0.6 and are experiencing the same issue; was there a regression to the modal fix. What version needs to be used to make sure that alert messages are modal?

    Release notes for 2.16 states that there was a fix for alerts not being modal. We are using 3.0.6 and are experiencing the same issue; was there a regression to the modal fix. What version needs to be used to make sure that alert messages are modal?

    We are trying to determine why alert boxes are not modal
    The fix states it's for Firefox 2.0 - 3.7a1pre
    We are using 3.0.6 not the current version of 3.6.13.
    Add-on release notes 2.16.1
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/foxyproxy-standard/versions/
    Repeating 2.16 release notes since 2.16 was not made available for more than a couple of hours
    Fixed bug whereby some alert boxes weren't properly parented/owned. This led to some alerts not being properly modal
    with respect to the window/dialog that issued the alert.

  • What is difference between using interface as source and table as source?

    I am working on a batch flow which need several steps to populate data from source to target. For example, I need 5 interfaces to finish final data loading. I can either use interface or use temporary table as source and target for the interface 2, 3, and 4. It looks like both case will use tables no matter use interface or use temporary table. So my question is if there is any difference between these two (using interface as source or use temporary table as source)?
    Thanks

    if you use a Table as source for the intermediate process, it will create a physical temporary table i your work rep(depends on you choice) and populate the data into the table. if you use a interface as a source, just it will create a sub query instead of temporary table.
    Thanks
    nidhi

  • Why doesn't SAP use SAPUI5 for this and that

    This is my personal opinion about this topic! Again and again I stumble about this and now I want to share some of my thoughts about this topic. I want to share this from a point of view, when I was not a SAP Employee - I worked at a SAP Partner company - because this best reflects the view from the outside.
    1. SAP "wants" us to use SAPUI5
    I don't think that "wants" is the right word - the right word is offers! In terms of: hey now even included in your license and open sourced (because you wanted it so). Look - we build sooo many Fiori apps with it - and put in some great enterprise features (right to left, accessibility, translation, ...) and it is responsive. So if you want to build Fiori-like "apps" - there you go - this is your technology to go! This is what I understood.
    I was very very very happy that it was build with open standards. But the main point for me another thing - (because I worked with Sybase Unwired Platform and SAP Mobile Platform) OMG an open data protocol!!! OData FTW! I could use ANY front-end technology and consume SAP data - the protocol is REST based - a dream came true. And so I did - yes I played around with Sencha Touch and OData, I used data.js and used it in a standard HTML5 application. We played around with an iOS application we already had and consumed the data. I feed the data into d3.js. I prototyped around with SAPUI5 and I have build apps with it. Brilliant, so I could choose whatever UI technology I wanted.
    I always had the feeling, that SAPUI5 was meant for B2E applications - and building many of that - and they should look and feel the same and I can theme the apps. I can use it when I want to make my applications SAP like - so that the user thinks the apps are all the same and everything fits nicely into the Fiori launchpad - great if you want to build partner apps. In my ex company we won a SAP Pinnacle Award - for a native iOS app, no SAPUI5 in sight - but we have received an award, so SAP did not "want us" to use SAPUI5 ;-)
    2. Is it the right UI technology for everything?
    At my ex-company I was dealing with mobile applications and web apps. I always knew that I get the best user experience when I write a real native application and if you want it to look like in a very specific way with awesome UI --> you would not do it with a write-once-run-everywhere HTML5 super-styled wrapped (phone gap/cordova) app - you would write the apps for the specific platform and it should feel like it was written for the platform. SAP offered us the SAP Fiori Client that I could enhance the user experience for the Fiori apps, but I was never told to use SAPUI5 it for everything.
    The same discussion goes on with: why was the new SAP website not build with SAPUI5, or the UX Explorer (eat your own dog food), or a useful internal app - why Angular, or the other way around why do we even use SAPUI5 and not Angular JS itself. Back to the past - SAP did never tell me to build a website with it, or to build something tiny and small with it (a widget) - or to enhance parts of a website with it - or to build something super-specific with it.
    And yes maybe the UI in a mobile app was not SAPUI5 but do you know if it uses Gateway with OData or the SAP Mobile Platform, was the API managed with Apigee, was HCI involved in getting the data from different sources, was it maybe wrapped with SAP Mobile Secure, did it maybe use a HANA backend or some of its features (predictions, text analytics, ...) - are some backend parts maybe hosted on HCP - who knows? So yeah, maybe other SAP technology was involved which you don't see, but in the end it made your life simpler.
    Instead of arguing around why this and that was used for this and that - can we save our energy and instead look at the result - which is all what counts - that it was the right UI technology with the right user interface which makes the user happy? I stated something like - does Google use AngularJS for everything? Nope. They offer us something great we can use. Right, maybe AngularJS is not as important for Google like SAPUI5 is for us. But we have something with which we can build our day-to-day business apps with and we do so.
    3. We missed great opportunity in not using SAPUI5 for this and that
    Let's think about how projects are going: you want something, you look at the costs, you choose most efficient option. Yes this could mean reusing an existing native application which was written long ago and you pimped it up. Or you had outsourced it to a company which wrote a similar app. Or you bought the source code. Or you have some cheap internal staff which could do it (students, trainee), or you could outsource it cheaply. Or all you have is people with experience in this and that technology. Or it must look in a very very specific way (because marketing says so) and you go native. Or it maybe should even differentiate itself and should look NOT like a Fiori app. And no - I don't think - this is my employees view - we are not for example an event app producer. We normally build business applications. And I don't think that we can write an app from scratch "just" for an event in a certain technology. Yes it would be nice if this and that would use SAPUI5, I think if it would be possible in terms of time and costs and UI wishes and hundreds of other factors we would do it with SAPUI5.
    Working at the partner SAP showed me over 50 Fiori apps, now hundreds of Fiori apps are released. SAP now showed that SAPUI5 is going big with S/4HANA. We have seen the Simple Finance solution. I was walking around at the CeBIT this year and I was impressed myself which cool apps and screens have been shown with SAPUI5. I used the SAPUI5 app on a Samsung Smart Watch myself. The SAP Web IDE itself is built with SAPUI5 in its heart. I don't need any other "proves" that SAPUI5 is great. I have seen great use cases for it, but I also know myself when I would use other stuff.
    4. My conclusion
    There is never every anything which can cover all different use cases. One-size-fits-all clothes also does not fit for everyone even if it says so. If someone creates something great don't judge it by the UI technology. Judge it by the experience and the value it creates. There are reasons why this and that was chosen. Use what fits your needs best with your requirements. Make the end user happy!

    Hey Denise,
    Thanks for pulling this discussion into SCN. Makes it much easier to discuss compared to Twitter. But I also have to apologize in the beginning that my answer now exceeds 140 characters by 50 times.
    Let me share my thoughts and personal opinion as well. I will try to look at it from a strategic point of view, as you – as the technical UI5 expert - have already covered the technical perspective.
    SAP recommends using SAPUI5 where it fits to customers’ requirements
    Let me begin with a clear statement from my perspective: It makes no sense that SAP takes customer decisions.
    Of course, customers expect SAP to help them with their strategies and decisions and of course we are helping. But at the end, the decisions have to be taken by the customer who needs to take the specific conditions of the company into account. The most important condition in the context of UX is the end user. But we shouldn't forget the business strategy as the most important influence factor. I’m not saying that technical decisions are completely unimportant, but I would like to point out that other things are more important for a company.
    As a result, it wouldn't make a lot of sense if SAP would just want every customer to use SAPUI5. To me, customers need recommendations leading to solutions that satisfy their needs and requirements.
    There is not that one UI technology that serves all needs
    This headline might be a challenging statement and I can already imagine reactions to it. But in fact I can confirm this sentence easily. You always have to combine different technologies. Some of them are from SAP others not. The selection and combination of these technologies is different from customer to customer because the requirements are different. There are still reasons to use Web Dynpro ABAP and I’m still recommending SAP NetWeaver Business Client, POWL (Power Lists), WDA Chips, FPM based on the given environment of the customer. And obviously there are also reasons for UI5.
    SAP already proves the usage of SAPUI5
    In general, I see two different use cases here: Developing custom applications vs. adopting applications from SAP.
    In the one case, customers want recommendations on development environments and UI technologies that consider their development requirements and existing conditions (e.g. existing skills, given implementations). SAPUI5 is a great UI technology and there are some special aspects that make the decision obviously easy. If I want to create simple business applications that can be connected with my SAP system easily, especially in combination under responsive conditions on multiple devices and targeted for casual and/or occasional users UI5 might be the right choice for many.  Exactly this pattern is what many customers are searching for these days. So, the recommendation for UI5 comes quite often.
    Whether or not SAP proves the usage of SAPUI5 in their own world is to me more connected to the use case where customers want to adopt SAP applications. And in deed, SAP is using SAPUI5. There are hundreds of SAP Fiori applications that have been built with SAPUI5 and there have been a lot of other applications developed using SAPUI5, too. And again, there is a huge need for applications for casual and/or occasional users, so that’s a big reason for SAP to create such applications.
    Websites vs. Business Applications
    This discussion was triggered by some statements in twitter, that SAP sites such as sap.com, SAP UX Explorer or the latest mobile conference app are not developed using UI5. Actually I see these to be websites but not business applications. I have never told a customer to build a website in UI5 and I would continue to do so.
    Maybe we need to discuss the difference between a website and a business application. I guess it is not easy to find a common understanding here, as the borderlines between several worlds have disappeared in the last years.
    Some years ago it was more or less easy to differ between:
    Native desktop applications running on a specific desktop OS
    Native mobile applications running on a specific mobile OS
    Browser-based applications running in specific browsers
    Websites, basically running on many browsers
    In the first three categories we saw business applications. 1 and 2 were selected especially when specific functions of the device and OS where needed to be accessed (for example the camera of the mobile device, the fast rendering capability of the desktop). 3 was also used for business applications but in most cases on desktop browsers.
    Today, one can develop browser-based applications that look like native applications and even can access the devices like native applications. Responsive design breaks the borderlines even more. Now, browser-based content can be rendered perfectly on a desktop browser as well as on a mobile phone and a user might even not be able to judge whether it was originally intended to be developed for the one or the other.
    So maybe there is no big difference anymore between websites and browser-based applications. But there is still a difference between browser-based applications and browser-based business applications, where additional requirements such as integration into business systems are drivers. Here I see SAPUI5 as a very cool UI technology.
    That’s just my 2 (personal) cents,
    JJ

Maybe you are looking for