Using mouse to make fine tuning adjustment

I have just installed Ligthroom 2.5 upgraded from Ligthroom 1.4; it appears that I can not longer make fine tuning of the ajustment using the mouse wheel but I am stock to move the slides by dragging them with the mouse or entering a value...
is the mouse wheel capacity to make adjustement discontinued with Ligthroom 2.5; if not, how do I got about using the mouse wheel?
Thanks,

Thank you very much for the clear answers.
Message for the adobe people, this is a major functionality lost (for an upgraded product) when ajusting for hundreds of picture this increase the time to make all the adjustment by many folds (which is my case). It would be worth investing time to fix the problem instead of removing a very important and useful fonctionality.
Can anyone provide the specification for the mouse that would support such functionality as indicated by Ian?
Thanks

Similar Messages

Raw fine tuning reverts back to older version

HI
I've spent the last couple of days editing several hundred files, they were originally imported before AP2 was released, so would have been using RAW file tuning version 1.1.
However I selected each one individually Removed all adjustments, which automatically gives it the Version 2 Raw Fine Tuning.
Today when I review the edited files, they have all reverted back to Raw Fine Tuning 1.1, the adjustments are still there, however the Recovery and Black Point sliders are greyed out. I'm using the Nikon D2Xs, so I know Version 2 is compatible.
Any ideas as to how this happened would be most welcome, and how to resolve this without having to go through each file again individually.
As a side note, there are a few files which have retained the Version 2 decoding, I am suspecting that these are one's where I have manually selected the decode rather than automatically via Remove All Adjustments.
Thank for any advice.
Kiran

keypix wrote:
What do you mean by 'migrating them'. I was under the impression that when Aperture 2 was first installed, it automatically migrated everything in the library.
Definitely NOT, thank the deity-of-your-choice! That would mean that all your old images would change appearance, in some cases drastically. Given that what you see in Aperture are effectively 'virtual' images that don't exist as regular files until you export them this would be a mess-up of monumental proportions.
All RAW files adjusted using the old RAW 1.1 decoding continue to use 1.1 until you change them, either by 'manually' choosing a different version of the decoding engine in the RAW Fine Tuning adjustment brick or by going to File>Migrate Images...
Ian

RAW Fine Tuning Sharpening vs. Edge Sharpening

What is the difference between "Sharpening" under "RAW Fine Tuning," and "Edge Sharpening" ?
I have a Canon EOS 5D, if you have the same camera, do you use the default "RAW Fine Tuning" Sharpening, or do you use different settings?
Thanks,
Toine

I usually apply a bit more than the default of the Raw Fine Tuning Sharpening, until textures look ok and there is not increase in noise.
Then I apply Edge Sharpening, as the name indicates will sharpen just the edges, having little effect on the noise or textures as for example the skin on a portrait.

I DEVELOPED A WEB SITE USING WEB PAGE MAKER WITH A MOUSE OVER TO PLAY A WAVE. WORKS IN IE BUT FF WILL NOT LOAD THE FILE IN HE BACKGROUND. WHEN I FIRST OPEN THE PAGE TO TEST IT WONT PLAY THE .WAV ANY SUGGESTIONS ADD ONS ETC NEEDED THANKS

I've developed a site using "web Page Make" I put a graphic on a page with a mouse over that morphs the graphic and plays a brief wave. I works with I.E but no go in FF 3.63.I am previewing this off a local networked drive. No problems with other net site with embedded audio do I need a certain add on etc. Can anyone offer some advice. Thanks
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== I preveiwed the site and try the mouse over feature to excute the wave

Make sure that you do not use bgsound to pay that music.
See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Background_music_does_not_play

How to make image resizable using mouse ?

Hi,
I want to know about that how to resize image by using mouse in Java Canvas. I created some tools like line, free hand, eraser. And want to know how to make an image resizable in canvas by using mouse. An image is jpeg, png, or gif format. I want to make image stretch and shrink by using mouse.
Please help me..
Thnax in advance.
Manveer

You make a listener to handle the mouse event that you want to capture, then program the affect you want using the event as the trigger.

In photos (iphoto) in 10.10.3 on macbook Air I lost the adjustment graph option. Am left with nearly useless choices w no fine tuning. Is there a way to access better adjustment?

In photos (iphoto) in 10.10.3 on macbook Air I lost the adjustment graph option. I'm left with nearly useless choices w no fine tuning. Is there a way to access better adjustment as in iPhoto?

In photos (iphoto) in 10.10.3 on macbook Air I lost the adjustment graph option. I'm left with nearly useless choices w no fine tuning. Is there a way to access better adjustment as in iPhoto?

Fine tuning with 3D roatation tool?

Hi,
I'm wondering if there is (and I feel there HAS to be) a way to fine tune movements with the 3D rotation tool. Using the mouse works to an extent, but just like nudging movements with the arrow keys, it's sometimes impossible to get the placement I want with mouse dragging. I'm pretty new to using these tools so maybe it's super obvious and I'm missing it?
Thanks!

Use the Motion Editor to do some great fine tuning. You can adjust each property separately and it will give you much better control.

Noise reduction - RAW fine tuning and the Noise Reduction tool

Hi,
1- If I get it right, Aperture's RAW fine tuning "Automatic noise compensation" (translated from French) option uses the camera's information to adjust the noise. Is that correct?
2- The Noise Reduction tool is there to provide additional noise reduction, but this makes you lose some details. Is that correct?
3- How do you use them? I often find the Noise Reduction tool a bit overkill, but that's me.
4- This one is just out of curiosity. How does A3 compare to LR3 beta for you in that regard? In my testing, LR3 did a slightly better job (but A3 totally beats the crap out of LR2 for noise). BUT I have an old D50, and newer cameras handle noise better (especially Nikon), so does it really make a difference for a 2008 or newer camera?
Thanks!
Manu

Manusnake wrote:
pilotguy74 wrote:
I don't even have this option/checkbox in my Raw Fine Tuning brick.
I wonder if it's due to the type of files (Canon 7D). Do you still have those 7D files I sent you? Does the checkbox appear in Raw Fine Tuning for you with them?
I noticed this option in the manual the other day, but forgot about it until now.
True, it doesn't have the checkbox with the 7D files. However, it as a slider "noise suppression" (again translated) in the RAW fine tuning options (and still has the Noise suppression brick).
If you don't have this one too, have you reprocessed your images with Aperture 3? Since it has a new raw engine, it may be the cause of it.
I find it strange that Apple didn't tout the new RAW engine on Aperture 3 new feature, it clearly is an improvement over Digital Camera RAW 2, especially in noise suppression.
I agree the built-in noise suppression is much better than A2, but IMHO it pales in comparison with the Noise Ninja plugin from Picturecode. The key is that you calibrate a profile for Noise Ninja by shooting a color chart full screen on your computer at varying iso settings with each of your cameras. You then feed the images back in to Aperture, and tell Noise Ninja to create a noise profile for each setting. The results are amazingly good.
Now with a lot of new cameras, noise processing is getting less important because the high iso performance is so good....but this is what makes Noise Ninja special...even when the noise adjustment is subtle, because it is working from a profile created with your camera, at the iso the shot was made at, its effects are seamless. They just announced a 64 bit plugin for Aperture 3, so no bouncing into 32 like other plugins at the moment...
Sincerely,
K.J. Doyle

Understanding Aperture's RAW fine tuning ?

Dear Aperture Experts,
I have been trying to familiarize myself with the RAW fine tuning brick for a while based on both the manual and internet research. However, I feel I still do not sufficiently understand its functioning and even have more questions now. I have grouped them in two categories below and would very much appreciate any skilled comments.
I use Aperture 3.4.4 under OS 10.8.3 with Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 4.05.
Many thanks in advance !
Philippe
A) Overall usage of the RAW fine tuning brick
Under which circumstances do you tweak Apple's default settings at all? I have seen people advocating they never ever change anything here stating it would be almost impossible to achieve any better result compared with the default, whereas others claim the very first thing they do for each and every picture is adjusting the raw decoding parameters, this being the whole gist of using a RAW workflow.
It appears that except for the moiré/radius settings there are adjustment bricks that can achieve similar processing as the other RAW fine tuning parameters. Under which circumstances would it then be preferable to use the RAW parameters rather then a corresponding adjustment?
Apple's default decoding settings are dynamic in the sense that its not just a fixed set of parameters applied to every image. Rather, I could observe that at least two different De-noise settings are applied (with my Canon EOS 7D) depending on the ISO speed: 0 up to ISO 1600 and 0.1 for 3200 and higher ISO speeds. 2a) Are there other parameters that are dynamically changed according to image properties? 2b) Is there a way to keep this dynamic behavior in self-defined presets for parameters that have not been touched, e.g. keeping ISO depending de-noise while using a lower hue boost value? Note that on the opposite it appears impossible to save a preset without changing at least one parameter from the Apple default. This means that you cannot automatically (e.g. at import) apply a static (rather than dynamically changing e.g. according to ISO) set of parameters being identical Apples's default. Strange.
Is there a way to automatically apply different sets of RAW fine tuning presets according to image properties at import time? I know there is the possibility to trigger an applescript subsequent to an import process. Based on this I understand one could apply different adjustment presets therein, but I don't think this applies to RAW decoding presets as well.
B) Individual RAW fine tuning parameters
I think I understand boost/hue boost. No question here
At first glance, sharpening is clear as well. However, I do not really understand how this parameter interrelates with the associated details slider (which used to be an "edge" slider in previous versions, suggesting a different function). When should I tweak one rather then the other? It appears that for my camera those two parameters are always set to 0 in Apple's default. I cannot believe no sharpening is required at all.
I understand that moiré/radius work together, but do they interact with De-noise (which is located in the same section), or is the latter independent from the former pair?
Can the moiré parameter pair be used to reduce chroma noise? I did not succeed at it, the only effect I observed was a hue change in some areas. Does it mean this slider (pair) is restricted to eliminating color fringes along edges in repeating small sized patterns?

That's true, because i've exported the images from my Aperture Library to my desktop (original JPEG settings from Aperture), and at that time i maked the snapshot of the EXIF, but here is the EXIF FROM APERTURE::
http://www.ldbproduction.nl/EXIF_Aperture.jpg
There are what changes in the RAW and JPEG:
So is the pixel size different, the color Depth by JPG is 8 bit and by the CR2(RAW) file is it 16 bit.
And the most stranged thing i see now is that the JPG version is using the sRGB-profile and the RAW used the Adobe RGB (1998), i realy don't know how to handle that in the camera! There is only one choice to make.

Raw fine tuning not working in slideshows

Hi,
Does anyone know why when I adjust the de-noise level of an image in Raw Fine Tuning and then use that image in a slideshow why the adjustment is not applied to the image shown in the slideshow?
I've tried regenerating the preview but it didn't make any difference.
Thanks
Ian

I think I've fixed my own problem - I changed the preview quality setting and it's OK now.

Applying Custom Raw Fine Tuning to Entire LIbrary

I have made a custom Raw fine tuning preset - how do I apply this to all the images in my library?

Very important, use "add" - this will apply the thing you are stamping on to all the other images, but leave the other adjustment tools alone. If you use "replace" you will loose ALL adjustments you have made to all images!
Also make sure to delete anything from the Stamp dialogue that is not the Raw Fine Tune setting you are trying to stamp (highlight other lines and hit delete).

RAW fine tuning v. general adjustments

I edit RAW images in Aperture2.
What is the difference between making edits in the "RAW fine tuning" window as opposed to the general adjustment windows? (for example, what difference is there between sharpening in RAW fine tuning v. general shapening adjustments.)
Is this related to "decoding" RAW images? What does that mean?

The RAW fine tuning drop down menu allows you to choose between two RAW converters/decoders....the one that Apple used in Aperture 1 and the one Apple uses in Aperture 2. I've never written a RAW converter, but I imagine it's like choosing between two developers when developing your film. They both produce an image from the RAW data but will do so slightly differently and you might prefer the result of one over the other. Chances are, the v2.0 RAW converter will be better just like an Agfa developer from 2000 is likely to be better than one from 1970.
The adjustments you make using the sliders sit on top of the basic image you get from the RAW conversion. The adjustments themselves shouldn't be any different in RAW 1.0 or 2.0, but because RAW 1.0 produces a subtly different base image to 2.0, the end result will be slightly different.
I'll be honest; I've never really looked for or noticed a difference between RAW 1.0 and 2.0, but there must be one or two.
Boomshakalaka!

Aperture 3 with Nikon D90 - How should raw fine tuning look like?

I try to trouble shoot my Aperture 3 (trial) installation. I have some troubles with the raw fine tuning controls and after reading the manual (again) I noticed that the fine tuning controls I get for my D90 are different from the ones displayed in the manual.
I get boost, hue boost / sharpening, edges / moire, radius, noise-reduction sliders.
In the manual there is no noise-reduction slider, just a check box for Auto Noise Compensation.
I got that control in Aperture 2, but not in Aperture 3. Now I’m wondering if something went wrong with my Aperture 3 installation. That would explain the problems I have with raw fine tuning. But before I try a complete clean install of my Mac i would like to know if I get the right raw fine tuning controls in Aperture 3.
Does anybody use Aperture 3 and a Nikon D90 and could tell me how the raw fine tuning controls he gets in Aperture 3 look like?
Thanks.

Greetings, First be sure you have your d7100 properly set to take maximum detail NEF images.
Go to your d7100 shooting menu and choose NEF (Raw) recording > Type
Choose N Lossless Compressed
Then go to NEF (RAW) Recording > NEF (RAW) Bit depth
Choose 14 bits
You were given good advice that you should not mess with the raw fine tuning brick in Aperture 3.6
Your d7100 has a default RAW import preset - make sure you have somehow not changed that Apple Aperture coded
raw fine tuning preset - this could make all your images far less sharp on import. You can easily revert to the Aperture 3.6 raw import brick default for the d7100 if you have somehow changed it by error. And always be sure to use your Aperture loupe or full screen viewer when applying any adjustment bricks.
Finally be sure that you understand the differences between the Sharpen adjustment and the Edge Sharpen adjustment. Both of these are very sensitive and very different sharpening tools. I do not shoot with a d7100, but use other Nikon FX DSLR's and I have never felt that any of my NEF imports lacked either Sharpness or Edge Sharpness given the Apple Aperture default raw image digital converters for each particular Nikon body. Good luck.

Configurable Code-list not Extendable in Fine-Tuning.

Hi
I am facing some problems while changing the values in Code-list while using fine tuning process in Configuration. I have created three code-lists and then being added to configuration using BAC.
In this BAC I have created one business Topic and three separate business options. Each business option is linked with each bcc (business Configuration Set).
Now when I go to and “Edit project scope” I am able to get the code list on my UI using extension fields and values are there too. But the problem I am facing is that in “Open Activity list” when I open the Business Options NOT all the options are opening properly.
Although I have got some of them opening fine and let me make changes while others are showing errors.
Any Advice Please.
Many thanks in Advance.
Regards
Asad

Yes i have regenerated now and still the same problem is there.
Yes the flag has been selected in the BC SET.
in Fine tuning there is slight difference in BOTH BC views.
One with normal behavior only shows the code in code list while the one with Issues/Problems is showing code & Description in same CODE column while some Times it does show only code though??
Any guess here?
Regards
Asad

Fine-Tuned Control: Purchase Order

Hello
When I make : SPRO -> Material Management-> Purchasing -> Message -> Output Control->Message Types->Define message type for purchase order->Fine-Tuned Control: Purchase Order
What means the U=>Update print-dependent data
Somebody could tell when I can use it, and tell me the impact of this.
Thanck you very much for your help.

Hi,
If you select this indicator "Update print-dependent data" under Fine-Tuned Control option then in PO, if you click on "Print Preview" button then system will not show the pop-up screen (which contains all the print parameters, default printer, Logical destination, etc...). And system will consider the output type as default for print preview for which "Update print-dependent data" is marked.

Using mouse to make fine tuning adjustment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for