Using old raw converter - why?

Aperture 3.2.3 has started importing images and processing them with an old raw converter for some reason. When I look at the image the first brick of the Adjustments tab contains a warning that the raw file was convertered using an old raw converter and giving me the option to update the processing. This has just happened all of a sudden, and I can't find any preferences to change the processing engine to the proper converter. Any ideas? Thanks.

I just noticed that there's an update to 3.2.4 anf to the raw converter. I applied those updates and the problem has gone away. Not sure why it happened in the first place 'though. One of those things...

Similar Messages

Use external raw converter

I have a camera whose RAW files cannot be processed by Aperture (ie by MAC OS). Can I specify Lightroom as an external editor and use it just as the raw converter for these files, but use Aerture for everything else (such as cropping, sharpening, printing, etc)?p

Re Caggiano's advice: I converted these RAW files to DNG but upon import to Aperture, they were labeled as Unsupported File Format, and I was unable to use an external editor on them. I have rised this issue before: that Aperture rejects the DNG files converted from Raw by the Adobe DNG Converter and Adobe Lightroom, even though they have been examined and shown NOT to be linear DNG files. So for some reason or bug, MAC OS not only rejects the raw files from my Fujifilm S100fs (which has a conventional Bayer array sensor) but also rejects the DNG files from those raw files.
Re Krieger's advice: I will have to convert my S100fs raw files to Tiffs in some other software and use the Tiffs in Aperture. At the moment, I am tempted to abandon Aperture altogether until my files are supported, and give up having my images all in one library. Lightroom, DXO, and Silkypix all will process these raw files.

Fujifilm S5 pro: using old RAW engine?

When I want to adjust pictures shot with my S5 pro in Aperture 2.0.1 I see RAW fine tuning version 1.1 in the HUD. When I shoot with my D2H however, vesion 2.0 is used. How does this difference occur?

Thanks for bringing this up. I have a S3-PRO and I have the same question. It seems the RAW 2.0 isn't supported on our cameras. I haven't been able to track down why or if this will be fixed in the future. It's definitely disappointing.

After having installed Mavericks I have problems with PSCS5 and the RAW converter. The glider for Exposure goes back to zero, when I use the fill in glider.

When I use PSCS5 after having upgraded to Mavericks I have problems when I use the RAW converter. The glider for exposure goes back to sero, hven I use the glider for fill in light, that means that my PSCS5 program not can be used. What do I do?

Single click on the Home button. Then double click on the Home button. In the recently used row, touch and hold the Contact app till they start to wiggle and then tap the minus sing by the contacts app.
Also make sure the Contact program on your computer is closed.

Arri raw converter ( alexa )

I may be able to get some sxs card alexa footage (just junk we shoot real fast when they call lunch break ) from work onto my graid external via friends at work.
they are shooting log c for this job but I guess we can make it arri raw instead.
question... does the arri raw viewer "see" the log c if thats what I get ? Or does it have to be raw ?
also...I have pc and I'm sure the stuff on camera truck for transfer is going to be mac... and my graid is now formatted ntfs pc...
I dont think mac can write to that...so if they format to mac and I buy macdrive that will work OK, right ?? I mean, they will be able to see the drive and format it to mac right ??
thing is, as favor to me at work I dont wanna make anything weird or difficult for them...time consuming etc.
and finally...apparently I can use arri raw converter to convert to quicktime stuff or dpx or ( if its raw ) to log c....any suggestions re: best quality downsizing would be appreciated ( as I have mousey computer and cs3 ).
thanks
( am ready for the laughter and jibes now )

what are you getting masters in ?
hmm, thanks for info re: track. Never used that. And only used panther a few times so that is sorta understandable I guess...
We use mostly film air alum track now. Used to use the steel mathews track mostly...till the filmair stuff got invented.
Sometimes use track wheels on fisher dollies...sometimes ( probaby most times ) use skateboard wheels. And dance floor or shelving ( 1x12 x 16 or cut to size clear pine ). Using 3/4 birch ply and plastic sheets mostly for dance floor. Is nice and smooth.
Gotta make sure plastic is same "run" though...out of the die at factory...or they are slightly off in thickness.
Rip dance floor stuff down to exactly 4x8, 4x4, triangles, 2x8 and 1x8...usually is good for all spaces.
yeah, doorways tricky especially on slight angle through instead of perpendicular to threshold...thats cool the panter track comes in narrow width. We usually "rack" the track a little if necessary and leave 2 adjacent wheels unlocked on peewee or chapman hybrid ( 2 legs float ).
So many cool things to yap about re: dolly... you would think, " what could be so tricky about this ??" ... but it does get a bit tricky sometimes.
I find about 1/3 or 1/4 of operators really good to work with -- usually the ones that didnt "grow up" doing steadicam and hand held are the better ones ( with wheeled heads ). If an operator can't use the wheels I usually think, " oh oh...this could be trouble..." But I heard you use mostly fluid heads over there in your neck of woods...in which case the wheel thing doesnt hold true for your operators... as they'd have to be real good with fluid head in general.
Nothing makes a boom looks dumber than changing air space above talent heads etc from less than lovely operating
same with back panning etc.. when I get an operator who knows what teamwork means..I am happy as a clam ! If he says, " leave the wheels unlocked so I can adjust with my feet " I am looking at a long day probably ( time will drag ).
I agree that doing editing ( even the little that I've done now in past year at home has helped me ) really solidifies some things re: shooting and pace and timing etc..as you mentioned....also it makes it more fun, believe it or not...as its easier to see the edit from the coverage and vica versa..( see what coverage you need when shots are blocked )... way more fun than just sitting there waiting for someone to say " put the lens here ".
I went to pratt for fine art photography and thought I knew a lot about lighting and camera when I started gripping...but there are guys here ( 4-5th generation ) who are soooo good its amazing. Know the framelines, cc, stops, depth of field, how to shape the light well ( diffusion, cuts, teasers etc ).. just really amazing ..some of the grips ...
You guys in general have very good reputations as talented crews here in USA..

Mac OS-X Raw Converter for Canon produces sometimes wrong colors

I have just acquired a Canon 5D Mark II and I have some problems with the RAW converter supplied with Mac OS. The image is 21 Megapixels and it is the result of a long exposure.
If I use the Canon Digital Photo Professional to produce the JPEG, I get correct results. If I use the
RAW converter supplied by Apple (used in Aperture, IPhoto, and Preview), then the picture has a
mauve-violet color. I can supply the test images along with the JPEG produced by the Canon software.
Thanks in advance,
Jean

Sounds like you may want to file a bug report with Apple. You can use Aperture's "submit feedback" button.
This is a user to user forum, so we can't help you here with this kind of issue.

Will elements 13 raw converter work with Canon 7D MK2 raw files

My friend is about to purchase the new Canon 7D Mk2 DSLR camera. He currently only takes images in jpg format and edits images with the Canon software provided with his current Canon camera. I have encouraged him to purchase Elements 13 and to start taking images in raw and using the raw converter. Will the raw converter in elements 13 be compatible with the raw files of the new Canon 7D MK2, please?
The Canon 7D MK2 is a new model and I realise that Adobe may not yet have prepared a raw converter to work with images from this camera. However it may be that the raw converter for the new camera is the same as that used in camera it replaces. Does anyone know please?
Regards Dave S.

The 7d mkii is not yet supported but should be in the next camera raw update. It’s not yet featured on the ACR8.7 list of new cameras, but this is only release candidate software. The 7d mkii could easily feature in the final version. Keep an eye on Adobe Labs for further updates.
http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/cameraraw8-7.html

WHY - give workable examples of using JHeadstart to convert forms into ADF.

Why give examples of how to use JHeadStart to convert forms in to ADF, but not allow it to be done with the evaluation version ... I assume it was possible with the 10g versions. Is it broken in 11g.
I was lookig to build a case for migrating an oracle forms application to Oracle Java and not a IBM or JBOSS or even .Net application, I can't build that case now, I have no budget to engage Oracle, have to do this of my own bat. Company has been take over by bigger company that has IBM stack.
Is Oracle this follish to allow the smaller users of Oralce to go by the way side, be lost to other languages etc

We deliberately did not include the Forms2ADFGenerator in the evaluation version.
Modernizing your forms application, possibly migrating it to ADF is a considerable effort that is often underestimated.
Migration tools like the Forms2ADFGenerator can help to a certain extent but are by no means a magic bullet. This is something we cannot stress enough, as over and over again we see people who think migration tools can make the difference. They cannot.
If you want to make a choice of development environment to modernize your forms application, then the availability of a migration tool should not play a role!
It is a fundamental and strategic decision to go for Oracle ADF which should not be influenced by a minor time saver like a migration tool.
To decide on the use of JHeadstart, the evaluation version with the tutorial should be convincing enough.
The real power of Jheadstart is not in the Forms2ADF Generator, this tool is just a lbonus that can save you a bit of time.
Here is some more info:
When does JHeadstart Forms2ADF Generator save time
The amount of work that can be saved by using the JHeadstart Forms2ADF Generator (JFG) very much depends on the structure of the Oracle Forms application at hand. The JHeadstart Forms2ADF Generator provides most savings for forms that have the following characteristics:
* Standard-Forms data retrieval and data manipulation through blocks based on database tables, with master-detail relations defined between the block
* Complex user interface, many (stacked) canvasses, many tabs, many list of values, and other display types
* PL/SQL logic mostly limited to user interface dynamics: conditionally showing/hiding user interface items, and conditionally changing the properties of user interface items. While JHeadstart does not convert PL/SQL logic, this type of logic is easily implemented in the ADF application because JHeadstart provides many declarative property settings to implement this behavior.
PL.SQL Logic
JHeadstart has made the deliberate choice to not automatically convert the PL/SQL logic to Java. The reasons for this are:
* It is impossible to automate the migration of a two-tier architecture (logic in Forms or in the database) to a three tier Model-View-Controller architecture as is common in JEE web applications, including ADF-based applications.
* The architecture of the converted application should be identical to the best-practice architecture of an ADF application that is build from scratch. If the architecture is the same, the same skill set can be used to maintain both migrated applications and ADF applications build from scratch. In addition, by going for a best practice architecture, the application is more flexible, and can be maintained easier at lower cost.
* When using the JHeadstart Forms2ADF Generator, you get this best-practice ADF architecture that is identical to ADF/JHeadstart applications that are built from scratch.
Other Forms2ADF Considerations
And even if it turns out the JFG adds a lot of value, there are many other questions you should ask yourself before embarking on a Foms2ADF project.
For example:
* Apart from technical reasons like old Forms verisons no longer supported, are there real business reasons and business benefits for migrating that justify the migration effort?
* To what extent is the application still meeting functional requirements?
* Are there issues with stability and end user friendliness?
* Old forms applications are typical "window-on-data" screens, you see the structure of the datamodel through the layout of the screens. Modern web 2.0 composite applications are more task-oriented with good support for human workflow. You should consider to what extent it wants to leverage all these new user interfaces capabilities that come with ADF Faces and WebCenter.
* How does the application fits in the overall IT landscape? What interfaces to other systems exist, what (old/obsolete?) technology is used to implement those interfaces?
* What about batch functionality and reporting facilities?
* May be part of the functionality of the current system can be replaced with standard off-the-shelf software?
* How sound, well structured and future proof is the underlying datamodel?
* To what extent are you looking at service-orientated architectures? Whats the SOA maturity level of your organisation?
* Above questions help to answer the key question: how desirable and benficial is it to migrate an old monolitic forms application 1:1 to a monolitic ADF aplication? How does that fit in overall IT strategy?
* Organisational isues: who will migrate the system, who will maintain the system? Is outsourcing considered? etc.
Next Steps
We offer a Forms2ADF assessment service in which we migrate a number of sample forms selected by the customer to assess the added value of the JFG, and we discuss all of the above questions
For example, I did one Forms2ADF assessment where it turned out that JFG added litlle or no value, but we were still able to convince the customer of the combined power of ADF and JHeadstart in (re-)building ADF apps from scratch.
You also might want to take a look at some presentations I did on this topic, and some online demo's:
* Guidelines for moving from Oracle Forms to Oracle ADF and SOA: http://www.slideshare.net/stevendavelaar/forms2-adfsoa-ukoug
* JHeadstart Forms2ADF Generator – Migrating from Oracle Forms to a Best-Practice ADF application: http://www.slideshare.net/stevendavelaar/jhs11-forms2-adfukoug
* 3 online demo's of forms2adf conversion process: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/jheadstart/overview/index.html
Hope this helps,
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

I've just installed CS6 creative suite mainly for photoshop CS6. It comes with camera raw 7.0.something, but need something newer to use my canon 6d. When I download camera raw 8.5 and install the raw converter doesnt work anymore, wont even open or isnt

I've just installed CS6 creative suite mainly for photoshop CS6. It comes with camera raw 7.0.something, but need something newer to use my canon 6d. When I download camera raw 8.5 and install the raw converter doesnt work anymore, wont even open or isnt available anymore in the plugin list. Tried to reinstall everything for a few times, but nothing helps.

When I search for updates the raw converter doesnt get update automaticly. Frustrating, is costing me the whole morning.

I use photoshop elements version 11 and just bought a nikon d750. Photoshop elements can't open/read the raw/NEF-file. Does a photoshop elements raw converter exist for Nikon d750 ??? And where can I get it ?

I use photoshop elements version 11. I just bought a nikon d750. Photoshop elements can't read/open the raw/NEF-file.
Does a raw converter exist for this camera and where can I find it ?
Thanks for any help.
erwing97792269

You need Adobe camera raw version 8.7. Unfortunately your software pre-dates the camera. ACR 8.7 is only compatible with PSE13. But it is possible to download and install the free DNG converter to convert your raw files to the Adobe universal Raw format and the files will open in all versions of PSE (keep your originals as backups and for use in the camera manufactures software)
Windows download (.exe file) click here DNG Converter 8.7
Mac download (.dmg file) click here DNG Converter 8.7
You can convert a whole folder of raw images in one click. See this quick video tutorial:
You Tube click here for DNG Converter tutorial

HT4059 See no free books on iBooks except old fiction. Why is this so. A matter of all kinds to be free. Please advise on how to use correctly.

See no free iBooks except old fiction. Why is this so. Please advise on how to find and use correctly.

What country are you in ? (This page shows what content types are available where.) Some countries currently only have free books, to be able to sell recent/current books in a particular country the publisher's need to grant Apple a license to do so. Have you got access to other ebook apps/stores in your country ?

My mac has started sending yahoo emails out as if they were being sent from an old gmail account I haven't used in years. Why has this just started happening?

My mac has started sending yahoo emails out as if they were being sent from an old gmail account I haven't used in years. Why has this just started happening?

It is important to understand that Mail uses TWO servers, a Receiving Server and a Sending Server.
When you create a new mail message, or reply to a message, the Sender server is shown in the message composition window like this:
That drop-down window allows you to select which of the Sending Servers you previously set up should be used.
In general, once you choose a Sending server, its choice will "stick" for all future replies to messages from that Receiving mailbox.

MY old camera was a 60D with 7.1 raw format and the new one is 6D. How do I get a plug in that will allow me to use both cameras in raw, and still access my old raw 7.1 files ? I am using Elements 11,

using Elements 11, can I get a plug in that supports both cameras, and still access my old raw 7.1 files

A new plug-in will support all the older cameras, so a plug-in that supports the newer 6D will also support the older 60D.
The 60D needs at least ACR 6.2.
The 6D needs at least ACR 7.3.
PSE11 ships with ACR 7.1 but can be updated all the way up to ACR 8.0.
What happens when you do a Help / Updates in the PSE Editor application?

Why RAW converter 6.5 not uploading in my PSE 9?

Hi,
I have a camera Canon T3i and am using PSE 9 to work on my photo's. Recently I bought an iMac and uploaded my PSE 9 and the CR2 (RAW) files are not able to be read. It right away makes my photo's JPEG's. I uploaded the RAW converter 6.5 for PSE 9 as suggested by the Adobe page. When I look at where my 6.5 download went to, its sitting in a "downloads" folder in my hard drive...do I need to move this to another location for it to upload into PSE 9?
When I look for upgrades in my PSE 9 program itself it tries to upload the 6.5, but it says there was an error in downloading the update. I have tried to uninstall PSE 9 and re-install it twice now, and the RAW converter version is still 6.1 in my PSE 9.
Help please?? I have been working on this literally for days..without much luck.
Thanks in advance.
Anita

Next time you have an installer you can right click on it and select Open and that bypasses the security settings set in the System Preferences.
For example, in your screenshot, right click on the AdobePatchInstaller.App, select Open and the next dialog click Open.
(you can also Control click on the installer to do the same thing)
http://support.apple.com/kb/ph14370
You can get the updates for pse 9 from here:
Adobe - Photoshop Elements : For Macintosh

Why can't i use my pdf converter on this computer?

why can't i use my pdf converter on this computer?

Very hard to guess. What happens when you try, exactly? (Exactly includes all error messages in full, please).

Using old raw converter - why?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for