Using salesforce connector in multiple mxml components

I am using Flex 2.0.1 and Salesforce as Database. My question
is i am creating login method in each component and application. I
want to use/pass salesforce connection from main application to all
sub component, how can i achieve this to avoid login for each
application/ component.
example: In my project i created main.mxml application and 3
mxml components in each component i am logining into the salesforce
database to retrieve data from the database. i want to avoid
creating multiple logins for the components instead of writing
login for each mxml component i want login for the first time in
main.mxml application and want to use the same connection in mxml
components. Can anyone tell me how can i achieve this
If you feel this is not sufficient information to solve this
problem then let me know i will post another message with sample
code.
Thanks in advance.

The solution I ended up using was just to reference the CSS file at the root MXML application. Then I could just use .styleName on the Menu component and voila, it worked.

Similar Messages

Help! Invoking the same Web Service from multiple mxml components

Hi,
I'm building an application that interacts with a Web Service. The application (App A) has a tabNavigator with two tabs (Tab1 and Tab2). Tab1 contains a custom component (Comp A) and Tab2 contains another custom component (Comp B). Tab1 is the first tab, and Tab2 is the second tab.
Comp A and Comp B each handles the "creationComplete" event by invoking an operation, Op1, of the Web Service.
The problem is, when App A starts up, Comp B can successfully invoke Op1 in its creationComplete handler, but Comp A cannot. In fact, Comp A's call to Op1 does not return. Comp A is created before Comp B.
If the application has only one tab (either Tab1 or Tab2), each Comp can successfully invoke Op1 at application start-up.
Comp A and Comp B each has its own declaration section for the Web Service and CallResponder for Op1.
I'm using the trial version of Flex Builder 4 and new to flex application development. Any help in debugging this problem would be greatly appreciated.
Much thanks,
--Hyong

I've been shown by a colleague (who is more experienced in .Net than am I) that this can be achieved by adding the target web service's WSDL to my invoking web service as a Web Reference. The original logic I was using, though working from VB 6 and Active Server Pages, can be simplified through the use of the WSDL definition for implementation in .Net.
Thank you for your responses,
-- Chris

RegionRenderer encodeAll The region component with id: pt1:r1 has detected a page fragment with multiple root components. Fragments with more than one root component may not display correctly in a region and may have a negative impact on performance.

Hi,
I am using JDEV 11.1.2.1.0
I am getting the following error :-
<RegionRenderer> <encodeAll> The region component with id: pt1:r1 has detected a page fragment with multiple root components. Fragments with more than one root component may not display correctly in a region and may have a negative impact on performance. It is recommended that you restructure the page fragment to have a single root component.
Piece of code is for region is:-
 <f:facet name="second">
 <af:panelStretchLayout id="pa1"
 binding="#{backingBeanScope.Assign.pa1}">
 <f:facet name="center">
 <af:region value="#{bindings.tfdAssignGraph1.regionModel}" id="r1"
 binding="#{backingBeanScope.Assign.r1}"/>
 </f:facet>
 </af:panelStretchLayout>
 </f:facet>
How do I resolve it ?
Thanks,

Hi,
I see at least 3 errors
1. <RegionRenderer> <encodeAll> The region component with id: pt1:r1 has detected a page fragment with multiple root components.
the page fragment should only have a single component under the jsp:root tag. If you see more than one, wrap them in e.g. an af:panelGroupLayout or af:group component
2. SAPFunction.jspx/.xml" has an invalid character ".".
check the document (you can open it in JDeveloper if the customization was a seeded one. Seems that editing this file smething has gone bad
3. The expression "#{bindings..regionModel}" (that was specified for the RegionModel "value" attribute of the region component with id "pePanel") evaluated to null.
"pageeditorpanel" does seem to be missing in the PageDef file of the page holding the region
Frank

Unable to define connector for multiple backend systems in BRM

Hi,
I am on GRCFND_A V.11 and SP04
I have multiple backend systems integrated with GRC box. So far I was using one backend connector as default one for role maintenance but it is not feasible if you have to create roles in variuos backend connected systems. I know one way to do so, i can keep changing the default connectors whenever i need to create roles but that is obviously not at all the onw any one would like to go with.
So, I tried to create unique connector groups for every individul backend connectors. But the issue is, the moment i assign the backend connector to the respective connector groups, the same gets reflected to other connector groups as well. So, whenever i either add or delete some of the connectors to any connector groups it gets modified/changed from all of the connector groups.
These are the backend connectors where i have to create roles from BRM whenever needed.
These are the connector groups:
I followed to the ink: GRC AC 10 BRM: Default Connectors with Multiple Back-end R/3 Systems , which is the same as mine issue, but not able to come to the solution point.
would appreciate for your quick response.
Thanks,
Ameet

Could anyone suggest solution to the above mentioned issue please?

Converting MXML Components to ActionScript Classes

I'm in the process of converting most (if not all) of my MXML
components to Action Script classes. I've found this is easy, and
doesn't require a lot of extra code when extending a simple
container or control. However, several of my MXML components have
several nested containers and controls - i.e. a component that
contains several Labels, a ComboBox, a TextInput, a Button, and a
DataGrid, plus several other containers needed for layout. To code
the layout of all these containers and controls using MXML, it uses
about 16 lines of code. To code the layout in ActionScript, it
takes about 50+ lines of code (see attached).
I'm just wondering if there are any best practices for
creating ActionScript classes that include several (or even A LOT
OF) containers and controls. It's very easy to layout in MXML, and
is more visibly pleasing to look at and understand, but I feel it
is best practice to code components as ActionScript classes. I know
I should be using MVC, but it's a little late to rewrite the entire
application now.
Any thoughts?

I can't specifically speak to how to write layout code in
ActionScript, but you can look at the generated code that Flex
creates to get an idea of how Flex does it. When you compile an
app, the Flex compiler takes your MXML input and converts it to
ActionScript classes before compiling the entire set of classes
into a SWF. Because of this, you can look at the interim
ActionScript code.
You do this by setting the keep-generated-actionscript
compiler option to true and looking in the /generated directory.
hth,
matt horn
flex docs

MDS Customization Problem with multiple root components

Hello,
Oracle JDeveloper 11.1.1.5.0 and WebLogic Server Version: 10.3.5.0
I am using Oracle MDS Customization class with the following classes:
oracle.adf.view.rich.change.MDSDocumentChangeManager
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.change.ChangeManager
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.change.MoveChildComponentChange
Based on these classes I am moving UI components
<af:panelStretchLayout>
<f:facet name="center">
<af:region />
</f:facet>
</af:panelStretchLayout>
into another component thanks to the MDS.
Once I do the movement and persist, I receive the following waning message:
*<RegionRenderer> <encodeAll> The region component with id: pt1:r1:0:pt2:r1:0:r1 has detected a page fragment with multiple root components. Fragments with more than one root component may not display correctly in a region and may have a negative impact on performance. It is recommended that you restructure the page fragment to have a single root component.*
When I run the application in Oracle JDeveloper 11.1.1.5.0, it work fine, but when I deploy it on WebLogic Server Version: 10.3.5.0 it is not working.
I receive the same warning message on the server and in JDeveloper.
I think that MDS makes a copy of the components that I move because of that it says me that "a page fragment with multiple root components"
The problem is not because of duplication any of the tags <af:document> <f:view><f:form> <html> <head> <body>
After the movement and persistence, I also call the FacesContext to reset its view root with the following code:
FacesContext context =FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
String currentView = context.getViewRoot().getViewId();
ViewHandler vh = context.getApplication().getViewHandler();
UIViewRoot x = vh.createView(context, currentView);
x.setViewId(currentView);
context.setViewRoot(x);
The idea is that the entire JSF tree to be rebuild on entering page with aim to clear previously drag and drop settings.
Do you know how I can overcome the problem on the server WebLogic Server Version: 10.3.5.0?
This worked on Oracle JDeveloper 11.1.1.3.0 and now the problem is with Oracle JDeveloper 11.1.1.5.0.
Regards,
Niki

Hi,
what the error means is that you have more than one node under the jsp:root node of the fragment. Say the content of your fragment is
<af:panelGroupLayout id="pgl1">
</af:PanelGrouPLayout>
Then this is okay
if you have
<af:panelGroupLayout id="pgl1">
</af:PanelGrouPLayout>
<af:panelGroupLayout id="pgl2">
</af:PanelGrouPLayout>
or
<af:panelGroupLayout id="pgl1">
</af:PanelGrouPLayout>
<af:commandButton id="cb1"/>
Then these mean duplicated root components. The JDeveloper IDE flags this as Warnings (Structure Window) when selecting the page fragment
Frank

"detected a page fragment with multiple root components" warning

I am getting a warning on the standalone WLS when I run my page that contains a taskflow as region. I am using a page fragment in my taskflow.
<Warning> <oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.rich.RegionRenderer> <ADF_FACES-60099> <The region component with id: ptMain:r1 has detected a page fragment with multiple root components. Fragments with more than one root component may not display correctly in a region and may have a negative impact on performance. It is recommended that you restructure the page fragment to have a single root component.>
The warning states the obvious, I have everything within a panelheader in my page fragment. Also, I do not get the warning on the integrated WLS. Any ideas as to why this warning is still popping up in the log? I am using JDev 11.1.1.3.
Thanks,
Jessica

Thank you for responding. I do not have any popups. I do, however, have another region nested within this fragment ( have this warning on another fragment that doesn't have a nested region though). Here is the code for my fragment.
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<jsp:root xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page" version="2.1"
xmlns:af="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/rich"
xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core">
<af:panelHeader text="Pawn"
binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.ph1}"
id="ph1" type="default">
<af:panelFormLayout id="pfl2">
<af:panelSplitter binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.ps1}"
id="ps1" orientation="vertical" splitterPosition="62"
inlineStyle="width:775px; height:660px;">
<f:facet name="first">
<af:panelBox text="Search #{bindings.agency.inputValue} Data to Update"
binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.pb1}"
id="pb1">
<f:facet name="toolbar"/>
<af:panelGroupLayout id="pgl3" layout="horizontal">
<af:inputText value="#{bindings.control_number.inputValue}"
label="Control Number" required="true"
columns="#{bindings.control_number.hints.displayWidth}"
maximumLength="#{bindings.control_number.hints.precision}"
shortDesc="#{bindings.control_number.hints.tooltip}"
id="it1">
<f:validator binding="#{bindings.control_number.validator}"/>
</af:inputText>
<af:inputDate value="#{bindings.trans_date.inputValue}"
label="Date" required="true"
shortDesc="#{bindings.trans_date.hints.tooltip}"
id="id1">
<f:validator binding="#{bindings.trans_date.validator}"/>
<af:convertDateTime pattern="#{bindings.trans_date.format}"/>
</af:inputDate>
<af:inputText value="#{bindings.agency.inputValue}" simple="true"
required="#{bindings.agency.hints.mandatory}"
columns="#{bindings.agency.hints.displayWidth}"
maximumLength="#{bindings.agency.hints.precision}"
shortDesc="#{bindings.agency.hints.tooltip}"
binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.it2}"
id="it2" visible="false">
<f:validator binding="#{bindings.agency.validator}"/>
</af:inputText>
<af:commandButton actionListener="#{bindings.ExecuteWithParams.execute}"
text="Search"
disabled="#{!bindings.ExecuteWithParams.enabled}"
id="cb5"
returnListener="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.refreshPage}"
action="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.RenderMe}">
<af:setActionListener from="#{bindings.PawnItemView1Iterator.currentRowKeyString}"
to="#{requestScope.pawnkey}"/>
</af:commandButton>
<af:spacer width="10" height="10"
binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.s1}"
id="s1"/>
<af:goButton text="Clear Values and Create New" id="gb1"
destination="index.jspx"
rendered="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.saveButtonRendered}"/>
</af:panelGroupLayout>
</af:panelBox>
</f:facet>
<f:facet name="second">
<af:panelGroupLayout binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.pgl4}"
id="pgl4" layout="scroll" partialTriggers=""
visible="true">
<af:panelGroupLayout binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.pgl6}"
id="pgl6" inlineStyle="width:775px;"
visible="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.renderTF}">
<af:region value="#{bindings.PawnEntryFormTF1.regionModel}"
id="r1" inlineStyle="width:750px;"/>
</af:panelGroupLayout>
<af:panelGroupLayout binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.pgl5}"
id="pgl5" layout="horizontal"
visible="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.renderMessage}">
<af:outputFormatted value="No #{bindings.agency.inputValue} Pawn data matching the Control Number and Transaction Date from above."
binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.of1}"
id="of1"
inlineStyle="font-weight:bolder; font-size:small;"/>
<af:spacer width="10" height="10"
binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.s2}"
id="s2"/>
<af:goButton text="Clear Search and Start Again"
binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.gb2}"
id="gb2" destination="index.jspx"/>
</af:panelGroupLayout>
</af:panelGroupLayout>
</f:facet>
</af:panelSplitter>
</af:panelFormLayout>
</af:panelHeader>

</jsp:root>

Flex mxml components should be private by default

Flex mxml components should be private by default. Does adobe
plan to fix this in future versions?

Just noticed this and I think he may have a valid point here.
But as well as reducing coupling the term I'd use to make this
argument is
encapsulation.
There's no way AFAIK to make MXML sub components invisible to
higher level components. This can sometimes reveal things
internally that you don't want messed with, within a custom
component. If you have a custom component that only requires
one property be set to configure it properly, you don't want
to be revealing all these extra sub-components just because they
had to have ids assigned to them inside the custom component.
This may be a headache for backwards compatibility, for
anyone who has assumed these components would be public by default,
but a simple "scope='public'" attribute should fix that. But even
having them public by default, and allowing us to set their scope
to private would be helpful at times.

Multiple Ibase/components with one change request / interfacing Lotus Notes

Scenario: Our users post all their software change requests (not only for SAP) into an application based on Lotus Notes. Professionals of the IT department evaluate the requests and make a offer for each of the change requests. The users may (or may not) accept the offer and place an order - all this in Lotus Notes, and not only for SAP.
If that order is confirmed and points to the SAP environment, Lotus Notes automatically must involve Solution Manager by calling a rfc-enabled function module in the Solution Manager system. This function module has to create a Solution Manager Change Request (simulating CRMD_ORDER transaction) together with its maintenance cycle, task list and transport request.
Problem: One of the problems is, that Lotus Notes change requests for SAP environment often require changes to multiple logical components, like R/3 plus BW plus CRM.
Question: The question is, how to create a Solution Manager Change Request for multiple components? This is caused by the restriction of the input screen of CRMD_ORDER which allows only one Ibase/component assignment.
Do you already have worked on this or any idea that might help? I would appreciate very much if you would share your expertise. Thank you.

Hi Heiner,
The work around that I use is in my maintenance project I have added all the logical components that I will have to work with.(R/3, ECC 6.0, BW etc..) This way, when I created the Maintenance cycle, my task list had all of these systems/clients in it.
The only hick is that in the CRMD_ORDER transaction, you only can put one ibase component.
The above mentioned solution works if you combine all your systems into one maintenance cycle.
let me know if this sheds any light for you.
Salpi

Mxml components not compiled into swc?

Hi, I am using Flash Builder(Flex 4) and i am having issues compiling mxml components into swc.
My scenario:
I created Flex Library project, added some mxml components and actionsript classes.
I created separate Flex project and added swc file to project's library path.
I can only import actionscript classes from my library.
ActionScript classes are compiled and bundled in the swc as expected, but all mxml components are not compiled into the swc.
Do you have the same issues compiling mxml components?
I am using Flash Builder Version 4.0 (build 253292).

My team occasionally sees issues with missing classes in a similar setup, although I can't confirm that it has been limited to MXML (and no one has been able to reliably reproduce).
I suspect our problem is the "includeAllClasses" property in .flexLibProperties (Project->Properties->Flex Library Build Path->Classes->Include all classes from all source paths)--it seems to not reliably compile in newly added classes. Our workaround right now is to instead click "Select classes to include in the library" and toggle our source directory every time classes are added, at least until we script our own build tasks. Looking through Jira I see this is a common issue: https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-23514 (and a few others).
Hope this helps,

Dynamically add custom MXML components in Actionscript

As there's no constructor for custom MXML components, how to
dynamically add it as a child using ActionScript?
I'm looking for some alternative to avoid the need to rewrite
the entire existent component in ActionScript just to add it this
feature (a constructor). PopManager is not an alternative...
Is there any way?
The case/situation:
I have a custom MXML component that needs to be dinamically
added to a NativeWindow created using ActionScript.
Thanks a lot!
Vicente Junior
Independent Web Developer
http://teclandoalto.blogspot.com

mxml classes get generated into AS classes with a default
constructor.
In fact, there is essentially no difference between an AS
component and an mxml component, they can be used exactly the same
way.
Tracy

Architecting an Application With MXML Components

I have an application that has gotten lengthy and I want to
simplify it by architecting the Main Application with custom MXML
Components. The application as it is currently architected works
perfectly.
Currently, the application consists of "Canvas" containers
along Top and Left Side holding Navigation Buttons. The main
(changing) sections of the application will consist of a
"ViewStack" container holding a number of "Canvas" containers
stacked on top of one another. The navigation buttons along the top
and left side, when clicked, display in turn the content of each of
the several stacked "Canvas" containers. Because of the number of
stacked "Canvas" containers within the "ViewStack" and the content
of each, the main Application source code has become very long and
unwieldy, thus the need to use custom components for each of the
"Canvas" containers in the "Stack" and referencing them in the main
Application page.
I have tried several times to get this to work and I need to
clarify a couple of things.
1) After setting up custom components for the several
"Canvas" containers that are now in the "ViewStack" container, do I
first need to set up a custom component for the "ViewStack"
container with its own name space?
2) If the answer to 1) above is Yes then do I then reference
each of the custom components for the "Canvas" container with their
own name space designation within the "ViewStack" reference within
the main Application?
In the event I am completely off base then I would appreciate
any suggestions. If you wish I would be happy to email you the
current application page.
Thanks,
Joe
joe k

Here is some code for an app built with components. You can
see how the pieces talk to each other a bit.
------------------------- ViewStack1.mxml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:Application xmlns:mx="
http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"
xmlns:comp="components.*"
layout="vertical" width="100%" height="100%" >
<comp:TopBar />
<mx:HBox width="100%" height="100%">
<comp:LeftBar />
<mx:VBox width="100%" height="100%">
<mx:ViewStack id="myViewStack" borderStyle="none"
width="100%" height="100%">
<mx:VBox id="home" width="100%">
<comp:MainIntroText />
<mx:HRule width="50%" height="3"
strokeColor="0xCC3333"/>
<comp:MainSecondaryText />
<mx:HRule width="50%" height="3"
strokeColor="0xCC3333"/>
<comp:MainFinalText />
</mx:VBox>
<mx:VBox id="about" width="100%">
<comp:About />
</mx:VBox>
<mx:VBox id="contact" width="100%">
<comp:Contact />
</mx:VBox>
</mx:ViewStack>
</mx:VBox>
</mx:HBox>
</mx:Application>
------------------------------- About.mxml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:HBox xmlns:mx="
http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"
width="100%">
<mx:VBox width="65%">
<mx:Text fontSize="14" width="100%" text="This page tells
you about us." />
</mx:VBox>
</mx:HBox>
----------------------------------- Contact.mxml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:HBox xmlns:mx="
http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"
width="100%">
<mx:VBox width="65%">
<mx:Text fontSize="14" width="100%" text="This page tells
you how to contact us." />
</mx:VBox>
</mx:HBox>
------------------- LeftBar.mxml -------------------------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:VBox xmlns:mx="
http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"
width="200" height="100%">
<mx:LinkButton label="Adobe Labs - Flex"
click="navigateToURL(new URLRequest('
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flex'),
'_blank');"/>
<mx:Spacer height="20"/>
<mx:Label fontSize="16" text="Flex Blogs"/>
<mx:LinkBar direction="vertical" width="90%"
itemClick="navigateToURL(new URLRequest(event.item.data),
'_blank');">
<mx:Object label="Adobe Flex Team Blog" data="
http://weblogs.macromedia.com/flexteam/"/>
<mx:Object label="Flex Blog Aggregator" data="
http://www.allyourflexarebelongtous.com/"/>
<mx:Object label="Adobe Flex Blog Aggregator" data="
http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mxna/index.cfm?query=byCategory&categoryId=5&categor yName=Flex"/>
</mx:LinkBar>
<mx:Spacer height="20"/>
<mx:Label fontSize="16" text="Example Flex Apps"/>
<mx:LinkBar direction="vertical" id="addlRscList"
width="90%" itemClick="navigateToURL(new
URLRequest(event.item.data), '_blank');">
<mx:Object label="Adobe Flex Store" data="
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flex/samples/flex_store_v2/"/>
<mx:Object label="Adobe Dashboard Example" data="
http://examples.adobe.com/flex2/inproduct/sdk/dashboard/dashboard.html"/>
<mx:Object label="Buzzword Word Processor" data="
http://preview.getbuzzword.com/?s=true"/>
<mx:Object label="Adobe Style Explorer" data="
http://examples.adobe.com/flex2/consulting/styleexplorer/Flex2StyleExplorer.html"/>
<mx:Object label="Adobe Component Explorer" data="
http://examples.adobe.com/flex2/inproduct/sdk/explorer/explorer.html"/>
</mx:LinkBar>
</mx:VBox>
----------------------- MainFinalText.mxml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:VBox xmlns:mx="
http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"
width="100%">
<mx:Text width="100%" fontSize="12"
text="Here is the final text I want to show you." />
</mx:VBox>
--------------------------- MainIntroText.mxml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:VBox xmlns:mx="
http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"
width="100%">
<mx:Text width="100%" fontSize="12"
text="Here is the main text I want to show you." />
</mx:VBox>
----------------------- MainSecondaryText.mxml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:VBox xmlns:mx="
http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"
width="100%">
<mx:Text width="100%" fontSize="12"
text="Here is the secondary text I want to show you." />
</mx:VBox>
--------------- TopBar.mxml --------------------------------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:HBox xmlns:mx="
http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"
width="100%">
<mx:Script>
<![CDATA[
private function goToViews(view:String):void {
if(view == "home"){
this.parentApplication.myViewStack.selectedChild=this.parentApplication.home;
if(view == "about"){
this.parentApplication.myViewStack.selectedChild=this.parentApplication.about;
if(view == "contact"){
this.parentApplication.myViewStack.selectedChild=this.parentApplication.contact;
]]>
</mx:Script>
<mx:LinkButton label="MySnazzyLogo" fontSize="20"
click="goToViews('home');" />
<mx:VBox width="100%">
<mx:HBox width="100%">
<mx:Spacer width="100%" />
<mx:LinkBar fontSize="14"
itemClick="goToViews(String(event.item.data));">
<mx:Array>
<mx:Object label="About Us" data="about"/>
<mx:Object label="Contact Us" data="contact"/>
</mx:Array>
</mx:LinkBar>
</mx:HBox>
<mx:HBox width="100%">
<mx:Spacer width="150" />
<mx:Label fontSize="25" text="Here is Some Additional
Text" />
</mx:HBox>
</mx:VBox>
</mx:HBox>

Data between mxml components

I have a question about data between mxml components.
Product.mxml is the overview screen for the products and ProductDetail.mxml (it is a TitleWindow) the detail screen.
In the Product I define a value object ProductVo with all the data. When I click a record in the overview and click the button 'change' (changeProduct function) then a popup window appears with all the data in it.
Code in Product.mxml:
[Bindable]
public var myWin:ProductDatail;
private function changeProduct():void {
myWin = PopUpManager.createPopUp(this, ProductDetail, true) as ProductDetail;
myWin["btnSave"].addEventListener("click", save);
private function save(event:Event):void {
productVo.productId = myWin.ti_productnr.text;
productVo.name = myWin.ti_name.text;
productVo.ean = myWin.ti_ean.text;
...some code to save the data in the db...
Code in ProductDetail.mxml:
[Bindable]
public var productDetailVo:ProductVo;
 <mx:Form>
 <mx:FormItem label="Productnr" required="true">
 <mx:TextInput id="ti_productnr" text="{productDetailVo.productId}" width="60"/>
 </mx:FormItem>
 <mx:FormItem label="Naam" required="true">
 <mx:TextInput id="ti_name" text="{productDetailVo.name}" width="200"/>
 </mx:FormItem>
 <mx:FormItem label="Ean">
 <mx:TextInput id="ti_ean" text="{productDetailVo.ean}" width="100"/>
 </mx:FormItem>
 <mx:FormItem direction="horizontal">
 <mx:Button id="btnSave" label="Save"/>
 </mx:FormItem>
 </mx:Form>
So my question: the save function in Product.mxml, is it possible to do this in a easier way instead of linking all the data from the form into the value object? Something like productVo = myWin.productDetailVo, but that does not work.

I just looked at the parsley framework and saw this code:
private function save():void
contact.firstName = firstName.text;
contact.lastName = lastName.text;
contact.email = email.text;
service.save(contact);
So, it is doing the same thing I'm doing.
I'm using Spring and hibernate on the server level, it is my own framework.

Resource Module Help for localization in custom mxml components

HI again,
Ok I have my resource set up to load at run time, working
great.
But I have mxml components should they not use the same
loaded bundle, or should I make smaller component bundles and load
them as well.
Best Practice etc...
Thanks in advance.

If you want the components to be decoupled and reusable with
ease, I vote for separate bundles.

How to include multiple image components into a single custom component???

How to include multiple image components into a single custom component???

Hi Marcel,
an ABAP transaction can only run or at least be started on one single system. A portal transaction can be assigned using a URL. This doesn't need any logical component.
Regards
Andreas

Using salesforce connector in multiple mxml components

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for