Using step group in ccBPM

Hi,
We are using PI 7.1. We have defined a step group (with transformation, send and receiver steps) into a SWC. In another SWC we have a ccBPM where we want to use the step group. Both SWCs are associated.
When we insert the step group into the ccBPM and we set up the steps for the step group, these changes are not saved!!!
We have disabled the flag "cannot be changed", but the changes are not kept and therefore we cannot active the ccBPM.
What is the problem?
Thanks in advance,
Samantha.

Hi all,
We copied the step group to the current SWC. Once this done, we have tried two things:
1. Using objects from the other SWC (Service Interfaces) to set up the transformation steps. These changes are not kept.
2. We have created new objects into the current SWC (Operation Mappings and Service Interfaces) to set up the transformation steps. That is to say, into the SWC we have created from scratch all objects that we need to configure our steps. However, when we modify the steps, the changes are not kept either.
If it is necessary to create all objects again into the new SWC, then the step groups are not too useful...
Any another idea?
Regards,
Samantha.

Similar Messages

  • Step Group , Monitoring Process and Integration Process.

    Hi Experts,
    I would like to when we use Step Group, Monitoring Process and what is the difference of these two with Integration Process. As we can use all the steps of Integration Process with Step Goup and Monitoring Process.
    Regards,
    Syed

    For the Step Group:
    You can consider it as a BPM which can be used in another BPM....concept similar to a reusable class :)....So if you have a constant patter of Receive --- transformation -
    Send in some BPMs then create a Step Group and include it in the required BPMs...
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/42/ef868be2753268e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

  • Single step workflow with multiple approvers (without using a group)

    Hi,
    is it possible to have a single step workflow with multiple approvers without using a group? This is for a contract document.
    i want to add a number of users based on particular logic. The approvers are random and do not belong to any particular group.
    DO let me know if it is possible or if any of you have done that.
    thanks in advance.
    regards,
    rubio

    Hi Rubio,
    I believe the behavior would be, if individual users are added as approvers then the system would require each approver to approve the document. However, if you use the user group, you could set the role so that it would be either ALL or ANY.
    Regards,
    Vikram

  • Processing a Two-Step Group in parts

    Dear all,
    I am processing my Two step group with LT0e and would like to process it partially.
    Is there a way to do that?
    Some background: When Picking from one of the Storage Types I want to use a Return Storage Type. Since this applies to one Outbound flow only, I have defined the Return Storage Type in my WM movement, NOT in the Pick Storage Type.
    In 2-step customizing, I have omitted the movement type, and am entering the Movement Type myself in LT0e. Only thing, I want to be able to make some kind of selection here so with my Movement Type I process only those items from the One Storage Type I am focussing on.
    To much info?
    Again, thank you for your time.
    Sandeep

    In LT0E once you have selected your group and via subsequent function do the picking step(2step picking -> start picking), you should be able to make the lines which you dont require "Inactive". Then you have only those lines for which you want to do the picking with your required movement type.
    Sandeepan

  • Problem in Step Group in BPM in PI 7.1

    hi
    I am using a Step group in my BPM which has a Transformation Step in it. I am able to set the Operation Mapping,SenderMessage,RecieverMessage in Transformation Step and i could save it also, but while activating the BPM all parameters are getting lost. And i tried setting the parameters again in transformation step. But while activating the BPM, it is getting lost automatically. Could you please help me in this?
    Thanks in advance
    Venkat.

    Hi,
    this issue is solved in the following patch levels (refer to note 1299880):
    MESSAGING SYSTEM SERVICE 7.10     SP006     PL18
    MESSAGING SYSTEM SERVICE 7.10     SP007     PL5
    MESSAGING SYSTEM SERVICE 7.10     SP008     PL0
    MESSAGING SYSTEM SERVICE 7.11     SP001     PL3
    MESSAGING SYSTEM SERVICE 7.11     SP002     PL0
    You might have to restore the Java Web Start archives (PI start page -> Administration -> Java Web Start Administration) to ensure that the JWS client uses the most recent Jars.
    Best regards,
    Tobias Breyer

  • IMPOSSIBLE TO USE A GROUPED MAIL  IN A SCHEDULING ACTION

    Hello Everybody,
    I am currently facing a problem while trying to schedule a report.
    In fact, when I use a simple mail  like '[email protected]', the report is well sent.
    However, when I use a grouped email  like '[email protected]', the people doesn't receive the email. In BO, all seems ok, there are no erros in the schedule history of the report and every services are OK.
    When I use any other kind of software (outlook, talend, ect..)  to send data thought this mail list , it works everytime.
    There is no particular configuration in the SMTP server.
    Does anyone here know why it doen't work with BO ?
    I work with BO XI 3.1.
    Thanks for your help!

    Are the users in CMC? If they are, Follow below steps.
    Create users and while creating the users add the email address of respective user.
    Add the users in a group.
    Go to the report and right click>Schedule.
    Add the group in 'Schedule For'
    Under Schedule> Destinations select Email.
    Update the information and in 'TO' specify %SI_EMAIL_ADDRESS%
    Schedule the report.

  • Anyconnect authentication via Radius (IAS) using AD groups

    Hi all,
    I'm trying to figure out how to setup our ASA to use AD group membership to assign users a profile using Radius.  The goal is to setup different access into the network. 
    For instance, one group would be allowed full access to the network, including access to infrastructure elements (ASA, routers, etc.)
    Another group will be given basic access to the network, but no access to the DMZ.
    Another group will be allowed access to the DMZ server, but not to the infrastructure.
    We're currently using Radius (IAS) on Windows Server 2003.  Is there a way to check group membership in AD using Radius? 
    I'd like to keep this as simple as possible, so I'm thinking of each profile using a different VPN Pool, then using split-tunneling to put routes, or not, to the required networks on the users device.  The users would only belong to one group in AD.  They will be able to choose their group, but if they're not a member they should be denied.
    I've done LDAP authentication using group membership, but we need good accounting and logging so we'd like to use the Radius server.  I've looked for this info everywhere, but it's pretty elusive. 
    Thanks for any suggestions, links, step-by-step instructions or volunteers to come on-site and help

    It's significantly easier with security products like Cisco Identity Services Engine, but you're adding infrastrcture and cost. Next best thing is DAP. DAP is actually pretty easy, don't let the config guide scare you away from it. IMO MS Radius stinks for anything other than basic authentication so I never use it for anything else.

  • Callback for specific step group

    Hi,
    I have a sequence, Main sequence. In this sequence, there is Setup, Main and Cleanup step group. Setup is to initialise my devices, Main is to perform the tests on my UUTs, Cleanup is to stop and clear task for my devices. I would like to have a TS sequence in such a way that it runs Setup and Cleanup once and continue to loop Main. With this setting, I would still want to have the UUT Information window popup.
    I have tried using SequenceLoadFile callback and put my vis for initialising my deivces (found in Setup) in this callback. It works when I first open my sequence file. However, I would like to know if I can do it in such a way that everytime I click Run (F5), it will run my initialise vis (found in Setup) once and keep looping Main with popup of UUT Information window for each UUT and run Cleanup with I click Stop on the UUT Information window.
    Could anyone give me some advise on how I can do so??
    Thank you & Regards
    Lee

    Process Setup Callback and Process Cleanup Callback.  They are model callbacks that you can add to your client sequence and put your initialize and cleanup code in.  You add them the same way that you added the Sequence File Load callback (which, by the way, is an engine callback). 
    The Purple sequences are engine callbacks.  The Green sequences are Model callbacks.
    It doesn't matter if you override engine callbacks like you are doing.  It just matters what kind of behavior you want.  In your case you need the two model callbacks I mentioned at the first.
    Hope that helps,
    jigg
    CTA, CLA
    teststandhelp.com
    ~Will work for kudos and/or BBQ~

  • ACS 5.3 Authorization problem with using Identity Groups in Access Policy Rule

    Hello guys, I am found a problem which I can't solve regarding authorization with using Identity Groups in Access Policy rule.
    ACS version: 5.3.0.40.6 (internal build B.839)
    I have very simple RADIUS Authorization rule which authorize user on behalf of right Identity Group.
    Requested Identity Group exist
    Testing user is created in Internal Users and has assigned requested Identity Group
    Radius Access Policy: 
    Authentication against Identity Store Sequence, where authorization server is external RSA SecurID device and additional attributes retrieval is configured from Internal Users.
    Authorization is very simple – One Rule with only one Condition which is: Identity Group - in - Requested_Testing_Rule. Then Default rule is set to Deny.
    When I will try login with my testing user then authentication against RSA SecurID is OK, but authorization will be denied by Default rule – It looks like my Rule with Identity Group is totally omitted.
    I am managing several other ACS servers (version 5.3 but with older patches) where similar rules are working without problem.
    What I am tested:
    Remove testing user and create his account again.
    Rename Identity Group
    Use another Identity Group
    Remove Access Policy rule and create it again
    Use Compound Condition: System:Identity Group
    Use Compound Condition: System:UserID instead of Identity Group in Rule (it is working without problem)
    Do you have any idea where problem can be?

    OK guys, it started working yesterday without any configuration change. Maybe it was some database inconsistence wich was solved by ACS itself.

  • Overhead calculation not happening after using orgin group.

    overhead calculation not happening after using orgin group.
    There was a runtime error earlier related to u201Cdefine credit u201C IMG node under costing sheet component and we have applied SAP note 769946 and that error was gone out of the way
    We want to apply/add Overhead to SFG/FG materials.
    We are using PP order with PCC(product cost collector) as the cost object , i.e costing by period.(system ECC 6)
    But our problem is with material standard cost estimate process.
    We have assigned overhead keys to the percentage rates in costing sheet for material standard costing and assigned the origin groups to the credits of costing sheet. But after running the cost estimate overhead is not taking into account for standard cost calculation.
    In the define credit entry table key field is valid to date strangly and actually system should allow one than one entry with same valid to date and same sec.Cost element(type-41) for different cost centers.
    But if we without using overhead key and origin group, the entire cost in that supporting cost center will come to all materials (SFG/FG) and we can not distinguish between different product materials(SFG /FG).
    We have checked all things as mentined below.
    Firstly that the correct costing sheet is assigned to the valuation
    variant.
    That the costing sheet is entered for the appropriate material type:
    Finished and semi finished or material components.
    All of the above can be checked and verified via transaction OKKN.
    In addition make sure that the base value maintained is present in the
    costing, for example the base may include an Origin group, is that
    origin group part of the materials being costed?
    Similarly if the base is found and values exist how is the overhead
    rate of the costing sheet set up, is it valid etc.
    And finally do a similar check for the credit.
    we doubt this as a programm error...
    So, request all experts to have ur feedback..

    Dear,
    Check your origin group & material unit of mesaurement is same.
    some time in costing sheet origin group is maintain in different unit & for materail it's maitain in other unit of mesaurement.
    You can see unit of measure for material in Additional data - unit of measure.
    Check BOM component material unit also.
    Check same  unit of measure is maintain in KZS2
    I hope above will useful.
    GOPAN

  • What are the key fields used to group double orders in t-code SDD1?

    What are the key fields used to group double orders in t-code SDD1?
    Cheers,
    VT

    Hi,
    You can group the duplicate sales documents with the help of the following fields,
    Sold-To-Party,Document type,date and sales area details.
    Regards,
    Gopal.

  • How to create groups in AD using AD group process definition

    Hello,
    I want to create group in AD when i create group in OIM & i had achieved this using JNDI & was able to create groups in AD
    successfully,now i want to create groups in AD using AD Group process definition which contains create AD Group task.
    Can anyone suggest what flow should be followed to achieve this ?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Rahul Shah

    I think you can do R & D to acheive this via Event Handler.
    1. Apply Event Handler on Group Object Form.
    In Event handler class.
    2. get the parameter from ADITresource.
    3. Make JNDI call.
    4. Create the same group name in AD.
    There may be easy approach.
    Which version of OIM you are using?
    Thanks,
    Kuldeep

  • What is the advantages of using Flexconnect groups

    what is the advantages of using Flexconnect groups in WLC?
    Reg,
    Ezra.

    Pls refer this document for more detail about these features
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Mobility/emob73dg/emob73/ch7_HREA.html#wp1091114
    FlexConnect is one mode an AP can operate, typically deployed in Branch setup where you do not have a controller at branch site. Those AP can register to a controller at your HQ or main site. So traffic will terminate at your branch switch instead of tunnel back to HQ-WLC.
    If you want roaming within your branch FlexConnect AP then you have to put those AP into a FlexConnect Group. Then only key information shared among those AP to facilitate fast roaming.
    Pls do not forget to rate our responses if you find them useful.
    HTH
    Rasika

  • Aggregate functions cannot be used in group expressions

    Hi have report showing sales by Vendor. I need to list all the vendors with Monthly Total>5000 and combine the rest as "OTHER VENDORS"
    Vendor is a Group in my report, so I tried to put an expression as a Group on:
    =IIF(Sum(Fields!Mth_1_Sales.Value)>5000,Fields!Vendor_No.Value,"OTHER VENDORS")
    I've got an error: "aggregate functions cannot be used in group expressions"
    How do I get Vendors with Sales < 5000 into  "OTHER VENDORS" ?

    Hi,
    You need to group by Month on group expression,
    And you can use the same expression in the report column as 
    =IIF(Sum(Fields!Mth_1_Sales.Value)>5000,Fields!Vendor_No.Value,"OTHER VENDORS")
    Many Thanks
    ..................................................................................................................................................................Please
    mark the post as Please mark the post as answered if this post helps to solve the post.

  • Use of GROUP BY in SELECT

    I am considering using GROUP BY in several selects where I will access very big bsik, bsid, bsad, bsak, ecc...
    My two concerns are performance and high data volume.
    GROUP BY should reduce data arriving from DB but will it hurt performance?
    What are your considerations?
    Any ideas are welcome. I cannot seem to find anything specific for or against GROUP BY.
    thanks,
    Phillip

    Hello Philip,
    I would advise that you do not use the Group By clause in the select statements for these tables. As you have rightly said, the data volume in these tables might be a major cause for concern.
    Using the Group By clause will heavily load the database server. while in the development environment, your query  might run okay, in the productive environment it might crash. The reason : the cursor to the database would have timed out.
    The Group By operation, as you know can be simulated after you get the data into the application server. The application server processing can take some time but you can usually optimize it.
    Regards,
    Anand Mandalika.

Maybe you are looking for