Using UCCHECK during upgrade to ECC 6.0.

We are upgrading from 4.6B to ECC 6.0. I am running UCCHECK to flag unicode errors. We are in the process of correcting these. We are assuming the warning can be ignored and are not mandatory to address. Is his a valid assumption.
thx,, J

Hi Markus,
Thanks for your interest.
The main problem I have is (I think) because this is an upgrade and all phase logs are under /usr/sap/put/log. Each phase has its own log file name that is known because the Upgrade Server web page has a phase list where it specifies those names so the problem should be explained there.
The only error I found in the logs for this phase is:
2 ETQ092 Package queue calculation failed, rc = "4", reason = "Calculate the queue part for EA-FINSERV rel.600 with target SP SAPKGPFD12 (level"
no other logs at that date and time mentions anything about support packages.
I looked at the logs under source release 4.6C but there is nothing on that date so I guess that it is doing all process with the upgrade executables.
What we did was to keep going using stack 11 that worked just fine as before but this problem is a black box in this process. Same happened before in a test upgrade and now we don´t get any clue either (in the logs).
Prepare only said that there was a calculation problem and that was it, no help, no clue, so we are blind here.
I don´t really want to create an OSS because in this enterprise the support service is Max Attention but notes takes the same time as in any other company with SAP licenses. About 3 weeks ago we had a problem and created an OSS note as High and we only got answers (and what kind of answers) every 24 hours and the problem was solved (4 days later) here doing all kind of tricks known by abap developers.
We are going to install stack 12 as a post upgrade process that is not exactly the best for us but we are in a tight schedule and are already upgrading Quality system only have one more chance to do upgrade tests in a production test system.

Similar Messages

Impacts on MRS and MAM during upgradation from ECC 5.0 to 6.0

Hi Gurus,
I would like to know the impacts on MRS and MAM during the upgradation from ECC 5.0 to 6.0. The version of MRS we are using is MRSS 500, and the version of MAM is 3.0. please let me know your valuable comments.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Satish

HELLO,
Search the form you will get few links.
Also many companies have gone technical upgradation , but not functional upgradation.
Thanks
RK

Error during Upgrade of ECC 6.0 to EHP5

Hi,
I'm upgrading our ECC 6.0 system to EHP5 (on SLES 11) using SAPup.
The system check is blaming the os version (please see italic text):
Result of system check:
Window "SDTExecution Intervervention required":
Determined system information:
Type of operating system: Linux X86_64
Version of operating system: 2.11.1
Type of database: SAPDB
Version of database: 7.7.07.034
ERROR: OS version 2.11.1 out of range (too low) Upgrade the operating system at least to version 2.3. before you continue.
WARNING: OS version 2.11.1 out of range (too high) If this version is released for the downward compatible kernel you are using, please ignore this warning. If not, ask SAP for an individual release of your configuration. Do not continue before SAP supports your configuration.
So the ERROR message is wrong, the WARNING is correct. It seems the upgrade tool is expecting a version between 2.3 and 2.9. How can I handle this "wrong" error message?
Best regards,
Christian
Edited by: Christian Janson on Jul 11, 2011 8:24 AM

Hello,
under the link:
[http://service.sap.com/instguides]
in the left tree select:
--> SAP Business Suite Applications
--> SAP ERP
--> SAP ERP 6.0
--> SAP enhancement packages for SAP ERP 6.0
--> SAP enhancement package 5 for SAP ERP 6.0
i found the following text:
SAP Enhancement Package Installation on top of SAP ERP 6.0
The standard tool to install SAP ERP Enhancement Package 5 on top of SAP ERP 6.0 is the SAP Enhancement Package Installer.
Download the latest versions of the SAP enhancement package installer (SAPehpi) guide and the SAP enhancement package installer tool.
But in the download directory the tool SAPup is mentioned.
So I'm not sure, which tool to use. Sorry.
Regards, Michael

Integration Repository during upgrade to ECC

Hi all,
Do you know of sap documentation regarding the SLD configuration and especially the "Integration Repository", When upgrading SAP system to ECC.
Thanks,
Naama

Upgrading to ECC system wont affect XI much, So I don't think you have to do anything in Integration Repository.
In SLD configuration you have to reconfigure Business System if the host name changes during upgrade.
And accordingly you have to change host name/ip address, user and password in RFC maintained in XI system which will point to ECC system.
In Integration Directory you have to change the business System name for ECC.
Regards,
Sarvesh

Migrating BADI defn during Upgrade to ECC 6

Hi All,
During Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6 , we are encountering a BADI Definition in SPAU list.Please let me know the procedure to handle this. Is it the same way as we migrate Classic BADI to ECC 6.0 New BAdI->Enhancement Implementation?
Thanks
Vasuki

Can you specify which BADI is giving you a problem.
Regards,
Suhas

Problem with JOB_RSINDCHK during upgrade to ECC 6.0

Hi,
We upgrade from 4.6b to ECC 6.0 SR1.
During phase JOB_RSINDCHK the upgrade fails.
The file RSINDCHK.ELG says:
INDEX PRE-CREATION CHECK Errors and RETURN CODE in RSINDCHK.DE2
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2EETG011 "Distribution ended with return code:4"
In the file RSINDCHK_DSxxxx.SID says:
3WEDA451 Inactive nametab contains no fields for table "M_VMVA"
4 EDA507 -> "M_VMVA" - - - "hostname_10" "08:20:44" "2007-03-01" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4 EDA471 Result "M_VMVA": Action: "ACT" Mode flag: " " Return code: "0"
Can someone give me a hint about how to solve the problem??
Regards
Magnus Jansson

Dear,
it looks that an inative nametab is available with no fields.
Could you please check how it is defined in se11 ?
you may perform the checks there as a first step for analysing this issue.
best regards,
Lucio Rodrigues
SAP Activel Global Support

Using rac during upgrade

Dear All,
We need to do our production 11i upgrade to 12.1.3 . Now, in this scenario , during the upgrade process, I need to lay the r12 file system in the new application server.
We have RAC in production, now how do I install R12 with pointing to both instances of RAC ? . SO, if not possible, during this time,
If, when running the upgrade driver, how can I change the connection string to point to both the instances ?
Please advise

We need to do our production 11i upgrade to 12.1.3 . Now, in this scenario , during the upgrade process, I need to lay the r12 file system in the new application server.
We have RAC in production, now how do I install R12 with pointing to both instances of RAC ? . SO, if not possible, during this time,
If, when running the upgrade driver, how can I change the connection string to point to both the instances ?Rapid Install 12.1.1 doesn't support RAC installation, so you need to shutdown all instances and keep one up, lay down the software and do the upgrade, then once the upgrade is done bring the remainings instances up.
Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12 High Availability Documentation Roadmap [ID 1072636.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Warning codes generated in UCCHECK   - Technical Upgrade - 4.0b to ECC 6.0

Hi SDN'ers ,
I am currently working on Technical Upgrade project from 4.0 b system to ECC 6.0 system . I am facing a
problem relating to the analysis of the warnings displayed whehn we run the UCCHECK for the client inventory by
checking the "Display lines that cannot be analyzed statically" option under the Selection-screen block
"Statements that cannot be analyzed statically" .Based on the warning codes generated during UCCHECK, they can
be classified into 12 different categories given below in the list ( Viz. ABB,MESSAGEG!C,MESSAGEG!D......MESSAGEG!P).The same are given below in the end
I want to know
- Which are the warning codes which need resolution so that the program does not encounter any runtime
errors or during Integration testing ?
- Do all the offset related errors (For example ;variable A = B+offset(length)
or variable A+offset(length) = B ) need resolution so that the program gives no runtime error.
- Also, do all statements where length is calculated using STRLEN also need changes ? I have seen offset length related warnings come under MESSAGEG!M warning code.
The objective of this is to make sure that the upgraded system ECC 6.0 in Australia ,when rolled out to
non-English speaking geographies in APAc such as Malaysia,Japan or China would only need translations and no ABAP Coding effort even when using languages such as Japanese which have double byte characters.
S.No.     Error Code     Message
1     ABB     Syntax Check Aborted
     ABB Total
2     MESSAGEG!C      check at runtime. at runtime.
           statement because of untyped or generic operands. It can only carry out this
          The system could not perform a static convertibility check on the current
     MESSAGEG!C Total
3     MESSAGEG!D      out this check at runtime. It can only carry out this check at runtime.
           to a table line because of untyped or generic operands. It can only carry out
          The system could not perform a static check on convertibility from a work area
     MESSAGEG!D Total
4     MESSAGEG!E      check at runtime. at runtime.
           defined by a "DATA" statement. .
           statement because of untyped or generic operands. It can only carry out this
          Field "ELEMENTN" is unknown. It is neither in one of the specified tables nor
          The system could not perform a static comparability check on the current
     MESSAGEG!E Total
5     MESSAGEG!F      operand "<FELD1>" for the current statement. .
     MESSAGEG!F Total
6     MESSAGEG!G      current statement on incompletely typed operand "<DATA>". .
     MESSAGEG!G Total
7     MESSAGEG!H      for the incompletely typed operand "<S>". . - - - - - - - - -
          The system cannot perform a static check on a character-type field data type
     MESSAGEG!H Total
8     MESSAGEG!I      incompletely-typed operand "<A>" in the current statement. .
          The system cannot perform a static check on a character-type data type for the
     MESSAGEG!I Total
9     MESSAGEG!J      "<%_1_SYSINI>" in the current statement to check whether the operand can be
          The system cannot perform a static check on incompletely-typed operand "VALUE"
     MESSAGEG!J Total
Early response wil be highly appreciated.

Hi Karthik
>
> 1) SPDD adjustments are done in which phase? PREPARE or UPGRADE?
>
SPDD is done in Upgrade ->Phase ACT_700
> 2) Are here special cases where the adjustments need to be done before running the UPGRADE phase?
>
At ACT_700 phase stop the upgrade and take a backup of the DB and the PUT<DIR> before starting the SPDD activity.
Make sure there are no pending tp request. Either release them or delete them.
All phase need to be completed successfully in PREPARE, before starting UPGRADE
Cheers
Shaji
Edited by: Shaji Jacob on May 5, 2008 9:23 PM

How to deal with BDLS during 4.6C -- ECC 6.0 upgrade?

Hi,
I am currently performing an upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0 and before which, I am also performing a data migration from x86 (Intel) servers to x64 (AMD) servers. So, we have three fresh AMD servers (DEV, QAS, PRD). While the current landscape (x86) is live, I migrated the data from PRD (x86) to DEV (x64) and performing the upgrade. I used the same data to perform upgrade on QAS (x64) also.
Now, performing the data migration and upgrade on the PRD (x64) would involve more downtime. So, in order to avoid that, have decided to split the whole process over two consecutive weekends. The plan is as follows:
Weekend 1:
Bring down the PRD (x86), do a complete backup and restore the same on PRD (x64), then perform the data migration activities on PRD (x64). Once this is done, we want to go live with the PRD (x64) running R/3 4.6C on MS SQL 2005 and Windows 2003, for one week (5 days - Monday through Friday).
And during these five days, I would perform the PREPARE phase.
Weekend 2:
I will start the upgrade on PRD (x64) on this weekend so that, we will get sufficient time to test and do post upgrade activities and decide to go live or not.
I hope the above procedure would work. What do you guys say?
Anyways, my question is, normally with the DEV and QAS, I perform the migration, PREPARE, upgrade and finally do the BDLS to convert the logical system to point to the new SID. But, with PRD, I cannot do so because, the system will go live with the new SID for one week. So, I may want to perform the BDLS on R/3 4.6C running on PRD (x64) and then perform the upgrade the following weekend. My question is, is it ok to do so?
NOTE: The SID in the x86 and x64 are not the same. I have mentioned above the same SID just for ease of reading and typing.
Thank you.

Hi Markus,
Sorry, it took a while to respond to your reply to my question. Yes, I understand that we don't have to convert the logical system. But, in our case, we use the production system database copy to upgrade the new development box. So, we have to convert the logical system in the newly upgraded Development system from the one that currently belongs to the 32 bit production system to a new logical system that is unique to the landscape. We cannot even use the logical system name that belongs to the 32 bit Development System because, that box is currently being used until we go live with the 64 bit production box. So, we will have to create a new logical system. In this case, as we want to maintain consistency in the logical system naming format across the new 64 bit landscape, we are probably forced to convert the logical system name on the 64 bit production box also.
So, now can you please advise, is it wise to convert to the new logical system after migrating the production server from 32 bit to 64 bit but, before the upgrade to ECC 6.0? As I had mentioned in my previous question, we will be live with the 4.6C on the 64 bit box for one week after migration to 64 bit but, before upgrade. In this case, I will have to connect to APO 64 bit and BI 7.0 64 bit (RFC) for one week before upgrade which, would need the logical system.
Or do you feel, we still can use the old logical system for the one week and after completing the upgrade, we can do the logical system conversion on the PRD to maintain naming consistency across the landscape?
Thank you.

Error during Upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0

Hi All,
We are facing an error when upgrading from 4.6c to ECC 6.0. We are facing this error on the table COEP - runtime object inconsistancy. What we found is there is ERP upgrade has created new extra fields in the table. In log file the error is specified as : Duplicate Field name, But we not able to find the duplicate field name in the table. Please kindly help as early as possible. The upgrade process is stuck.
Regards
Anil Kumar K

Hi Anil,
Is this issue fixed? Can i know how you fixed it?
replied to your message Re: How to adopt the index changes during upgrade.
Thanks,
Somar

Need useful documentation for upgrade of SAP 4.7C to ECC 5.O

Hi,
As my company is going for the upgrade to ECC 5.0, can you guys help me out by sending some useful documentation regarding the upgradation, as i never worked on upgradation project before.
Points will be rewarded for usefeul information.
Please send the documents to the following email id: [email protected]
Thanks,
Bobby

Hello Kumara,
First read the release notes of ECC 6.0 with respect to ur version (4.7c).
Observe changes in ECC 6.0 and make further changes in Blue print new release.
u can find the release notes at sap help and also at the screen.
If there any further requirements, u can collect the requirements that is billable
Regards,
Narendar Konakanchi

BW Related Jobs in ECC during upgrade

Hi,
we are upgrading from ECC 5 to ECC6.
During upgrade, how should we handle the BW related jobs in ECC.
How do we get the list of BW related jobs that are running in ECC
How are these Jobs created in ECC ?
Thanks
Rekha

Hi Rekha,
You can check the job in SM37. check with options scheduled and released checked.
Usually we will find jobs related to V3 scheduled in LBWE in SM37.
take immediate run for that job and cancel it.
now run your delta IP's to load the records from delta queue to BI system.
Regards,
Venkatesh

I just got my shipment and My Ipad mini is just shut down without reasons during upgrading. I'm doing restore it. Does it matter for the future use?

I just got my shipment and My Ipad mini is just shut down without any reason during upgrading. I'm doing restore it. Does it matter for the future use?
ACtually I really really don't want to use it anymore. I'm so disappointed.

PolishAngel756 wrote:
Some friends have told me that their phone can last up to 2 days without charging??
If they are getting 2 days without charging, it's unlikely they use their device very much.
A full day is pretty good....and if I'm careful, I can easily get a full day of usage.
For me, normal is charging the iPhone mid afternoon at work, but I use it a lot.
My typical usage is 35 mins of listening to podcasts, checking email, checking my RSS feed, and checking a few apps while I ride my bike when I first get up. Then listening to several podcasts at work.
I typically stream music while working out during my lunch hour and use the Men's Health Fitness app to track my progress.
By about 2pm I'm ready to charge the device as it's getting low (somewhere between 20% and 50%).
I leave bluetooth, Wi-FI, and location services turned on all the time.
Personally, I just do not see the point in going into settings to turn on the feature when I need it... just too much hassle. All of my listening to podcasts and music is via Bluetooth.
I know I'm not the heaviest user, but I just do not see how anyone can realistically make it two days on a single charge, it makes me think they simply do not use the features of the device and would be just as well served with a basic or feature phone.

ERROR MESSAGE IN PPOME TCODE AFTER UPGRADE TO ECC 6.0

Hi Experts,
I have a question.
Recently our system went for upgrade and during testing phase we have found one issue.
Error message is appearing in PPOME transactio code after upgrade to ECC 6.0
The screen is getting defaulted to Budget section and unable to find the subtype as there are no subtypes available there and showing error message as "Fill in all required fields".
Please let me know your solution on this.
Regards,
Sekhar.

Hi,
- you can deactivate the budget tab in the IMG-activity 'Hide/Show Tab Page'
(SIMG_CFMENUOHP1HFW20 alternatively use SM30 on view 'T77OCTABUS')
1. Create new entries for the following KEY:
a) Scenario OME0
b) Object type 'P', 'O', 'S'
c) Tab Page 'PBC_ORIG'
2. for each of this entries, set the 'Exclude Tab Page'-Flag.
- in case you do not want to deactivate the Budget tab:
The error occurs due to missing entries for subtypes in table T778U
for infotype 1516.
Please maintain the according subtyes you want to use if you create a
budget.
Regards,
Ana

Smart form Addon after Upgrade to ECC 6 EHP4

Hi,
I have succesfully upgraded my system from R/3 4.7 EXT 1 to ECC 6 EHP4.
During upgrade i had to delete Pre configured smart forms Addon ( According to note 572392 ) .
Since we are on EHP4 and no smart forms configured we are not able to print.
The latest pre configured smart form addon ( Best Practice all in one) available is for EHP3.
Please let me how to proceed with this situation as there may be other compaines who are on EHP4 and use pre configured smart forms.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks,
FBK

If you have old system copy try to copy forms into the new.
Kind regards,
Mirek

Using UCCHECK during upgrade to ECC 6.0.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for