Using where clause with hardcode value in execute immediate

Dear Experts, I am using below in stored procedure getting exception,
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'DELETE FROM CC.TB WHERE COL='HG'';
where col is varchar2(30) in CC.TB
Please guide how can i use above statement in stored procedure
Thanks,

DBA wrote:
Dear Experts, I am using below in stored procedure getting exception,
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'DELETE FROM CC.TB WHERE COL='HG'';
where col is varchar2(30) in CC.TB
Please guide how can i use above statement in stored procedure
Thanks,Why are you using Dynamic SQL? DELETE statement is a DML statement and its valid inside a PL/SQL block.
So you can remove the execute immediate and write your DELETE statement directly.
begin
delete from cc.tb where col = 'HG';
end;

Similar Messages

Using where clause with like

Hi all,
im trying to set a block default where clause in the pre-query trigger of my block "customer_settlement" , to query the records that exist in a customers table like this, where the customer_name is variable based on the value entered by the user in enter-query mode before hitting the F8 key , the statement is :
set_block_property( 'customer_settlement' , default_where ,
' fk_cust_code in ( select customer_code from customers where customer_name like %' || :customer_settlement.customer_name ||'% )' );
the query doesnt work and giving me an error " unable to perform query" , notice that :customer_settlement.customer_name is an item in the block , the user change it and would like to query upon it , and its not a base table item on customer_settlement block its on customers table only . I tried all combinations of '%' and || but it seems that oracle can't see the value In the customer_name field.
any help is highly thanked.
im using Oracle form 9.0.4 and Oracle 10g Db.
Regards,
IKQ

Hi,
does this work ?
set_block_property( 'customer_settlement' , default_where ,
' fk_cust_code in ( select customer_code from customers where customer_name like '''%' || :customer_settlement.customer_name ||'%''' )' );
Frank

How to use where clause with get statement in LDB programs

Hi All,
I am using logical databse in my report program.I am not getting how to use the where clause in the get statement is it possible to use?or if not possible only option is we should filter it after get statment is right?Can you please some body throw some idea on this?
Regards
Mahesh

Hi,
Reffer these links
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/9f/db9bfa35c111d1829f0000e829fbfe/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/9f/db9b5e35c111d1829f0000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c6/8a15381b80436ce10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
/people/srivijaya.gutala/blog/2007/03/05/why-not-logical-databases
reward if helpful
Thanks,
Suma.

Where clause with null values

I need to have a where clause but either/both of the two attributes compared could be null. How can I make this work, atm it just returns no records even though rows do exist.
Thanks

Andrew,
I think you didn't read correctly what I wrote. I said:
"Even if a column is unique you still can have several nulls in it"
So I didnt speak about the case where you have severeal columns in a unique constraint but only ONE.
SQL> CREATE TABLE tab1 (col1 number);
Table created.
SQL> ALTER table tab1 add constraint tab1_col1_uk unique (col1);
Table altered.
SQL> INSERT INTO tab1 VALUES (1);
1 row created.
SQL> INSERT INTO tab1 VALUES (2);
1 row created.
SQL> INSERT INTO tab1 VALUES (2);
INSERT INTO tab1
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00001: unique constraint (MUELLERMAU.TAB1_COL1_UK) violated
SQL> INSERT INTO tab1 VALUES (NULL);
1 row created.
SQL> INSERT INTO tab1 VALUES (NULL);
1 row created.
And even if you have a unique constraint over several columns you can still have more than on records containing only nulls in all fields related to that unique contraint.
SQL> CREATE TABLE nn (col1 number, col2 varchar2(3));
Table created.
SQL> ALTER TABLE nn ADD CONSTRAINT nn_uk UNIQUE (col1, col2);
Table altered.
SQL> INSERT INTO nn VALUES (NULL,NULL);
1 row created.
SQL> INSERT INTO nn VALUES (NULL,NULL);
1 row created.
Regards
Maurice

Using where clause with cast multiset

version
oracle 10g
how to select values based on values in the object.
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE init_queue AS OBJECT (
   seq_num_q                 NUMBER,
   source_system_name        VARCHAR2 (50 BYTE),
   milestone_id              NUMBER,
   milestone_date            DATE,
   downstream_order_number   VARCHAR2 (175 BYTE),
   leg_id                    VARCHAR2 (175 BYTE),
   statuspro_captured_date   DATE,
   pon                       VARCHAR2 (26 BYTE),
   milestone_source          VARCHAR2 (26 BYTE),
   session_id                NUMBER,
   reconfirmation_flag       CHAR (1 BYTE),
   vec_flag                  CHAR (1 BYTE)
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE tab_init_queue AS TABLE OF init_queue;
SET serveroutput on;
DECLARE
   v_list       tab_init_queue := tab_init_queue ();
   v_arr_sort   tab_init_queue := tab_init_queue ();
BEGIN
   SELECT init_queue (seq_num_q,
                      source_system_name,
                      milestone_id,
                      milestone_date,
                      downstream_order_number,
                      leg_id,
                      statuspro_captured_date,
                      pon,
                      milestone_source,
                      session_id,
                      reconfirmation_flag,
                      vec_flag
   BULK COLLECT INTO v_list
     FROM r_cust_status_init_queue;
   SELECT CAST (MULTISET (SELECT *
                            FROM TABLE (v_list)
                           WHERE v_list.milestone_id = 11 -- * How to select values based on milestone.*
                           ) AS tab_init_queue)
     INTO v_arr_sort
     FROM DUAL;
   DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (v_arr_sort.COUNT);
END;
/Edited by: new learner on Aug 23, 2010 7:35 PM

new learner wrote:
version
oracle 10g
how to select values based on values in the object.
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE init_queue AS OBJECT (
seq_num_q                 NUMBER,
source_system_name        VARCHAR2 (50 BYTE),
milestone_id              NUMBER,
milestone_date            DATE,
downstream_order_number   VARCHAR2 (175 BYTE),
leg_id                    VARCHAR2 (175 BYTE),
statuspro_captured_date   DATE,
pon                       VARCHAR2 (26 BYTE),
milestone_source          VARCHAR2 (26 BYTE),
session_id                NUMBER,
reconfirmation_flag       CHAR (1 BYTE),
vec_flag                  CHAR (1 BYTE)
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE tab_init_queue AS TABLE OF init_queue;
SET serveroutput on;
DECLARE
v_list       tab_init_queue := tab_init_queue ();
v_arr_sort   tab_init_queue := tab_init_queue ();
BEGIN
SELECT init_queue (seq_num_q,
source_system_name,
milestone_id,
milestone_date,
downstream_order_number,
leg_id,
statuspro_captured_date,
pon,
milestone_source,
session_id,
reconfirmation_flag,
vec_flag
BULK COLLECT INTO v_list
FROM r_cust_status_init_queue;
SELECT CAST (MULTISET (SELECT *
FROM TABLE (v_list)
WHERE v_list.milestone_id = 11 -- * How to select values based on milestone.*
) AS tab_init_queue)
INTO v_arr_sort
FROM DUAL;
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (v_arr_sort.COUNT);
END;
/Edited by: new learner on Aug 23, 2010 7:35 PMLike this.
DECLARE
   v_list       tab_init_queue := tab_init_queue ();
   v_arr_sort   tab_init_queue := tab_init_queue ();
BEGIN
   v_list.extend;
   v_list(v_list.count) := init_queue(1, '1', 11, sysdate, '1', '1', sysdate, '1', '1', 1, '1', '1');
8
   SELECT CAST (MULTISET (SELECT *
                            FROM TABLE (v_list)
                           WHERE milestone_id = 11 -- * How to select values based on milestone.*
                           ) AS tab_init_queue)
     INTO v_arr_sort
     FROM DUAL;
   DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (v_arr_sort.COUNT);
END;
1
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
ME_XE?ME_XE?
ME_XE?select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Product
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE     10.2.0.1.0     Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
5 rows selected.
ME_XE?It would have been easier if you'd made a simple example so i didn't have to type out the example record (since your original code referenced a table you didn't provide DDL and INSERTS for).
Something to keep in mind for the future (the easier you make it for us, the more likely we are to help).

Where clause with time stamp

Hii,
I have an issue with using where clause with time stamp. My requirement is to
select * from driver_on_policy
where last_change_datetime = '2001-03-06 19:00:06'
date is in this form 6/3/2001 7:00:06 PM
thnks
sam

If you want to use '6/3/2001 7:00:06 PM', then
where last_change_datetime = to_timestamp('6/3/2001 7:00:06 PM','DD/MM/YYYY HH:MI:SS PM')If you can use a literal string in ANSI standard YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS format, then just
where last_change_datetime = timestamp '2001-03-06 19:00:06' (That 'DD/MM' might need to be switched around to 'MM/DD' if you are in America.)
Message was edited by:
William Robertson

How to Get the required List Item values by using Where Clause

I have two tables named "TAX_RULES","BILL"
1. " Tax_Rules" (Sub_Head_Code,Tax_ID,Tax_Percentage)
{ While "Sub_Head_Code" field is unique,
Tax_ID describes that there are two kinds of Tax_IDs based on Tax_percentage which is 6% for some Sub_Head_Codes and 3.5% for the remainng Sub_Head_Codes. I have given Tax_ID 1 for 6% and Tax_ID 2 for Sub_Head_codes having 3.5%. }
2. "BILL" (Bill_ID,Sub_Head_Code,Tax_ID,Bill_Amount)
{While "Bill_ID" describes unique Bill Identification Number,
Sub_Head_Code and Tax_ID are behaving like composite foreign key from Tax_Rules table}
I have design form for both tables.
In BILL form i am trying to get values of Tax_ID from Tax_Rules table at run-time by using WHEN-NEW-FORM-INSTANCE.
For this whenever i select a Sub_Head_Code in Bill Form, all the Tax_IDs that i have recorded against each Sub_Head_Code which is either 1 or 2 against 6% and 3.5% respectively.
But I want that whenever i select a "Sub_Head_Code", Only that Tax_ID which is associated with that Sub_Head_Code ahould come in the LIST ITEM.
I have used WHERE clause but that is useless.
Following is the Code that i have applied in the WHE-NEW-ITEM-INSTANCE Trigger at FORM LEVEL
<CODE>
DECLARE
     rg_n1 VARCHAR2(40) :='TAX_ID';
     rg_idn1 RecordGroup;
     gc_idn1 GroupColumn;
     errcode NUMBER;
BEGIN
     CLEAR_LIST('BILL.TAX_ID');
     rg_idn1 := Find_Group(rg_n1);
IF      Id_Null(rg_idn1) then
          rg_idn1 := Create_Group(rg_n1);
     gc_idn1 := Add_Group_Column(rg_idn1,'EXPLAIN',CHAR_COLUMN,60);
          gc_idn1 := Add_Group_Column(rg_idn1,'TAX_ID',CHAR_COLUMN,3);
     END IF;
     errcode := Populate_Group_With_Query(rg_idn1,'select TAX_ID,TAX_ID from TAX_RULES');
     POPULATE_LIST('BILL.TAX_ID',RG_IDn1);
END;
</CODE>

In the Tax Rules table, you state:
"Sub_Head_Code" field is unique
In the Bill table, you state:
Sub_Head_Code and Tax_ID are behaving like composite foreign key from Tax_Rules table
If the Sub_Head_Code is unique, then it's acting as a primary key, so Sub_Head_Code and Tax_ID in the Bill table are not behaving like a composite foreign key. The Sub_Head_Code is a foreign key, and the Tax_ID is irrelevant as far as keys are concerned.
It is not clear what it is you want to do.
If you want to display the Tax_IDs from the Bill table when you select a Sub_Head_Code from the Tax_Rules table, then change your query to:
select TAX_ID, TAX_ID from BILL where Sub_Head_Code = :Tax_Rules.Sub_Head_Code
If you want to display the Tax_IDs from the Tax_Rules table when you select a Sub_Head_Code from the Bill table, then change your query to:
select TAX_ID, TAX_ID from TAX_RULES where Sub_Head_Code = :Bill.Sub_Head_Code
If this is not what you want, then clarify what it is you want to do. Don't say:
"I want that whenever i select a "Sub_Head_Code", Only that Tax_ID which is associated with that Sub_Head_Code"
because it is not clear what tables you are referring to.

Can we use where clause in Update on Merge statement?

Hi All,
I tried to execute the following Merge Query:
When this query is executed without ‘Where clause’ in Update statement its working fine. When executed with ‘Where clause’ it throwing the following error:
ORA-00905: missing keyword.
Following is the sample query which I tried to execute:
MERGE INTO TABLE_NAME
USING (SELECT COLUMN FORM TABLES)
ON (CONDITION)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET
     COLUMN UPATES
WHERE CONDITION -- Can we use where clause here?
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
INSERT
INSERT VALUES;
Can some one help on this?
Thanks in advance.
Darius

Yes:
SQL> drop table emp1;
Table dropped.
SQL> create table emp1 as select * from emp where deptno = 30;
Table created.
SQL> update emp1 set sal = sal*2;
6 rows updated.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> select ename,sal from emp1;
ENAME             SAL
ALLEN            3200
WARD             2500
MARTIN           2500
BLAKE            5700
TURNER           3000
JAMES            1900
6 rows selected.
SQL> MERGE INTO emp1
2 USING(select * from emp) emp
3 ON (emp1.empno = emp.empno)
4 WHEN MATCHED THEN
5 UPDATE SET sal = emp.sal WHERE ename = 'TURNER'
6 WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
7 INSERT(ename,sal) VALUES(emp.ename,emp.sal);
9 rows merged.
SQL> select ename,sal from emp1;
ENAME             SAL
ALLEN            3200
WARD             2500
MARTIN           2500
BLAKE            5700
TURNER 1500
JAMES            1900
SMITH             800
JONES            2975
CLARK            2450
SCOTT            3000
KING             5000
ENAME             SAL
ADAMS            1100
FORD             3000
MILLER           1300
14 rows selected.
SQL> SY.

Parameterized queries running much slower than ones with hardcoded values

Very often there is a huge performance difference when using parameters in a query, compared to running the same code after replacing the parameters with hardcoded values: the parameterized version of the code runs much slower!
The case is not parameter sniffing as it is not a (compiled) stored proc, but code executed directly from the editor and the performance issue has been observed in different versions of SQL Server (2000 and 2005).
How is this explained and how can the parameterized queries have similar performance with the hardcoded ones?
Also, why does this happen in some cases and not always?
Finally, the same is sometimes the case with stored procs: a very slow running proc speeds up tremendously when running its code directly, instead of calling the procedure --and even faster, according to the previous, when its parameters are replaced with
hardcoded values

>>The case is not parameter sniffing as it is not a (compiled) stored proc, but code executed >>>directly
from the editor ?>>>and the performance issue has been observed in different >>>versions of SQL Server (2000 and 2005).
Something like below?
--SQL Server creates 3 execution plan rather only one
DBCC FREEPROCCACHE
GO
SELECT *
FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader
WHERE SalesOrderID = 56000
GO
SELECT * FROM
AdventureWorks.Sales.SalesOrderHeader WHERE
SalesOrderID = 56001
GO
declare @i int
set @i = 56004
SELECT *
FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader
WHERE SalesOrderID = @i
GO
select stats.execution_count AS exec_count,
p.size_in_bytes as [size],
[sql].[text] as [plan_text]
from sys.dm_exec_cached_plans p
outer apply sys.dm_exec_sql_text (p.plan_handle) sql
join sys.dm_exec_query_stats stats ON stats.plan_handle = p.plan_handle
GO
----This time only (we get parameterization)
DBCC FREEPROCCACHE
GO
EXEC sp_executesql N'SELECT SUM(LineTotal) AS LineTotal
FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader H
JOIN Sales.SalesOrderDetail D ON D.SalesOrderID = H.SalesOrderID
WHERE H.SalesOrderID = @SalesOrderID', N'@SalesOrderID INT', 56000
GO
EXEC sp_executesql N'SELECT SUM(LineTotal) AS LineTotal
FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader H
JOIN Sales.SalesOrderDetail D ON D.SalesOrderID = H.SalesOrderID
WHERE H.SalesOrderID = @SalesOrderID', N'@SalesOrderID INT', 56005
GO
select stats.execution_count AS exec_count,
LEFT([sql].[text], 80) as [plan_text]
from sys.dm_exec_cached_plans p
outer apply sys.dm_exec_sql_text (p.plan_handle) sql
join sys.dm_exec_query_stats stats ON stats.plan_handle = p.plan_handle
GO
Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
MS SQL Consulting:
Large scale of database and data cleansing
Remote DBA Services:
Improves MS SQL Database Performance
SQL Server Integration Services:
Business Intelligence

Dynamic where clause with loop statement

Hi all,
is it possible to use a dynamic where clause with a loop statement?
Can you please advise me, how the syntax needs to be?
Thanks for your suggestions,
kind regards, Kathrin!

Hi Kathrin,
           If u are in ECC 6.0, please go through the code...
          REPORT zdynamic_select.
TYPES:
BEGIN OF ty_sales,
    vbeln TYPE vbak-vbeln,            " Sales document
    posnr TYPE vbap-posnr,            " Sales document item
    matnr TYPE vbap-matnr,            " Material number
    arktx TYPE vbap-arktx,            " Short text for sales order item
    kwmeng TYPE vbap-kwmeng,           " Order quantity
    vkorg TYPE vbak-vkorg,             " Sales organization
    kunnr TYPE vbak-kunnr,             " Sold-to party
    netwr TYPE vbak-netwr,             " Net Value of the Sales Order
END OF ty_sales.
DATA :
gt_sales TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF ty_sales,
wa_sales TYPE ty_sales.
DATA: ob_select TYPE REF TO cl_rs_where.
DATA: ob_from   TYPE REF TO cl_rs_where.
DATA: ob_where TYPE REF TO cl_rs_where,
      gv_source TYPE abapsource.
START-OF-SELECTION.
*Step 1 : Prepare the select fields.
PERFORM zf_build_select.
*Step 2 : Build the from clause for the select
PERFORM zf_build_from.
*Step 3 : Build the where clause for the select
PERFORM zf_build_where.
*Step 4 : Execute the dynamic select
SELECT (ob_select->n_t_where)
      FROM (ob_from->n_t_where)
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE gt_sales
        WHERE (ob_where->n_t_where).
LOOP AT gt_sales INTO wa_sales.
    WRITE :   /5 wa_sales-vbeln,
              15 wa_sales-vkorg,
              20 wa_sales-kunnr,
              40 wa_sales-netwr,
              50 wa_sales-posnr,
              60 wa_sales-matnr,
              70 wa_sales-arktx,
              90 wa_sales-kwmeng.
ENDLOOP.
*&      Form zf_build_select
FORM zf_build_select .
CREATE OBJECT ob_select.
*Build the table name/field name combination
*Add Sales order header fields
CLEAR gv_source.
CALL METHOD cl_rs_where=>build_tabname_fieldname
    EXPORTING
      i_tabname   = 'VBAK'
      i_fieldname = 'VBELN'
      i_sign      = '~'
    IMPORTING
      e_combined = gv_source.
*Add the where line
CALL METHOD ob_select->add_line
    EXPORTING
      i_line = gv_source.
CLEAR gv_source.
CALL METHOD cl_rs_where=>build_tabname_fieldname
    EXPORTING
      i_tabname   = 'VBAK'
      i_fieldname = 'VKORG'
      i_sign      = '~'
    IMPORTING
      e_combined = gv_source.
*Add the where line
CALL METHOD ob_select->add_line
    EXPORTING
      i_line = gv_source.
CLEAR gv_source.
CALL METHOD cl_rs_where=>build_tabname_fieldname
    EXPORTING
      i_tabname   = 'VBAK'
      i_fieldname = 'KUNNR'
      i_sign      = '~'
    IMPORTING
      e_combined = gv_source.
*Add the where line
CALL METHOD ob_select->add_line
    EXPORTING
      i_line = gv_source.
CLEAR gv_source.
CALL METHOD cl_rs_where=>build_tabname_fieldname
    EXPORTING
      i_tabname   = 'VBAK'
      i_fieldname = 'NETWR'
      i_sign      = '~'
    IMPORTING
      e_combined = gv_source.
*Add the where line
CALL METHOD ob_select->add_line
    EXPORTING
      i_line = gv_source.
*Add Sales order item fields
CALL METHOD cl_rs_where=>build_tabname_fieldname
    EXPORTING
      i_tabname   = 'VBAP'
      i_fieldname = 'POSNR'
      i_sign      = '~'
    IMPORTING
      e_combined = gv_source.
*Add the where line
CALL METHOD ob_select->add_line
    EXPORTING
      i_line = gv_source.
CLEAR gv_source.
CALL METHOD cl_rs_where=>build_tabname_fieldname
    EXPORTING
      i_tabname   = 'VBAP'
      i_fieldname = 'MATNR'
      i_sign      = '~'
    IMPORTING
      e_combined = gv_source.
*Add the where line
CALL METHOD ob_select->add_line
    EXPORTING
      i_line = gv_source.
CLEAR gv_source.
CALL METHOD cl_rs_where=>build_tabname_fieldname
    EXPORTING
      i_tabname   = 'VBAP'
      i_fieldname = 'ARKTX'
      i_sign      = '~'
    IMPORTING
      e_combined = gv_source.
*Add the where line
CALL METHOD ob_select->add_line
    EXPORTING
      i_line = gv_source.
CLEAR gv_source.
CALL METHOD cl_rs_where=>build_tabname_fieldname
    EXPORTING
      i_tabname   = 'VBAP'
      i_fieldname = 'KWMENG'
      i_sign      = '~'
    IMPORTING
      e_combined = gv_source.
*Add the where line
CALL METHOD ob_select->add_line
    EXPORTING
      i_line = gv_source.
ENDFORM.                    " zf_build_select
*&      Form zf_build_from
FORM zf_build_from .
CREATE OBJECT ob_from.
*Add opening bracket
CALL METHOD ob_from->add_opening_bracket
CLEAR gv_source.
*Add the join condition.This can be made
*fully dynamic as per your requirement
gv_source = 'VBAK AS VBAK INNER JOIN VBAP AS VBAP'.
*Add the where line
CALL METHOD ob_from->add_line
    EXPORTING
      i_line = gv_source.
CLEAR gv_source.
*Add the join condition.This can be made
*fully dynamic as per your requirement
gv_source = 'ON VBAKVBELN = VBAPVBELN'.
*Add the where line
CALL METHOD ob_from->add_line
    EXPORTING
      i_line = gv_source.
*Add the closing bracket
CALL METHOD ob_from->add_closing_bracket
ENDFORM.                    " zf_build_from
*&      Form zf_build_where
FORM zf_build_where .
DATA :
lv_field TYPE REF TO data,
lv_field_low TYPE REF TO data,
lv_field_high TYPE REF TO data.
CREATE OBJECT ob_where.
*Add the field VBELN : Sales Document
*Use this method if you want to assign a single value to a field
*Set the value for VBELN : Sales Document Number
CALL METHOD ob_where->add_field
   EXPORTING
     i_fieldnm = 'VBAK~VBELN'
     i_operator = '='
     i_intlen   = 10
     i_datatp   = 'CHAR'
   IMPORTING
     e_r_field = lv_field.
CALL METHOD ob_where->set_value_for_field
   EXPORTING
     i_fieldnm = 'VBAK~VBELN'
     i_value   = '0000120020'.
*Use this method if you want to assign a range of values
*Set a range for the Sales Document number
CALL METHOD ob_where->add_field_between_2values
    EXPORTING
      i_fieldnm      = 'VBAK~VBELN'
      i_intlen       = 10
      i_datatp       = 'CHAR'
    IMPORTING
      e_r_field_low = lv_field_low
      e_r_field_high = lv_field_high.
CALL METHOD ob_where->set_2values_for_field
    EXPORTING
      i_fieldnm    = 'VBAK~VBELN'
      i_value_low = '0000120020'
      i_value_high = '0000120067'.
*Set the 'AND' Clause
CALL METHOD ob_where->add_and.
*Add the field MATNR : Material
CALL METHOD ob_where->add_field
    EXPORTING
      i_fieldnm = 'MATNR'
      i_operator = '='
      i_intlen   = 18
      i_datatp   = 'CHAR'
    IMPORTING
      e_r_field = lv_field.
*Set the value for the Material field
CALL METHOD ob_where->set_value_for_field
    EXPORTING
      i_fieldnm = 'MATNR'
      i_value   = '000000000050111000'.
*Set the 'AND' Clause
CALL METHOD ob_where->add_and
*Add the field VKORG
CALL METHOD ob_where->add_field
    EXPORTING
      i_fieldnm = 'VKORG'
      i_operator = '='
      i_intlen   = 4
      i_datatp   = 'CHAR'
    IMPORTING
      e_r_field = lv_field.
*Set the value for VKORG : Sales Organization
CALL METHOD ob_where->set_value_for_field
    EXPORTING
      i_fieldnm = 'VKORG'
      i_value   = 'GMUS'.
ENDFORM.                    " zf_build_where

CASE Statement in Where Condition with Multi Valued parameter in SSRS

Hi All,
I am little confused while using CASE statement in Where condition in SSRS. Below is my scenario:
SELECT
Logic here
WHERE
Date IN (@Date)AND
(CASE
WHEN NAME LIKE 'ABC%' THEN 'GROUP1'
WHEN ID IN ('123456', '823423','74233784') THEN 'GROUP2'
WHEN ABC_ID IS NULL THEN 'GROUP3'
ELSE 'GROUP4'
END ) IN (@GROUP)
So above query uses WHERE condition with CASE statement from @GROUP parameter. I want to pass this parameter as multi- valued parameter and hence I have used CASE statement IN (@GROUP).
For @Date one dataset will pass the available and default values and
for @GROUP parameters, another dataset will pass the available and default values.
But this is not working as expected. Please suggest me where I am making mistake in the query.
Maruthu | http://sharepoint-works.blogspot.com

Hi Maruthu,
According to your description, I create a sample report in my local environment. It works as I expected. In your scenario, if the selected values from the Date parameter contains some of the Date field values, the selected values from the GROUP parameter
contains some of GROUPS (‘GROUP1’,’GROUP2’,’GROUP3’,’GROUP4’) and the corresponding when statement is executed , then the dataset returns the corresponding values.
In order to trouble shoot this issue, could you tell us what results are you get and what’s your desired results? If possible, you can post the sample data with sample dataset, then we can make further analysis and help you out.
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

How can I pass multiple condition in where clause with the join table?

Hi:
I need to collect several inputs at run time, and query the record according to the input.
How can I pass multiple conditions in where clause with the join table?
Thanks in advance for any help.
Regards,
TD

If you are using SQL-Plus or Reports you can use lexical parameters like:
SELECT * FROM emp &condition;
When you run the query it will ask for value of condition and you can enter what every you want. Here is a really fun query:
SELECT &columns FROM &tables &condition;
But if you are using Forms. Then you have to change the condition by SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY.
Best of luck!

Performance hit using "where" clause in the query

Hi All,
I am facing a huge performance hit in the java code when using "where" clause in queries. Following are the details:
1. SELECT * FROM Employee
2. SELECT * FROM Employee where employeeid in (26,200,330,571,618,945)
There is no difference in Query Execution Time for both queries.
Business Logic Time is huge in second case as compared to first one (ratio - 1:20).
Rows returned are more in first case as compared to second case.(ratio - 1:4)
Business Logic is same for both the cases where I iterate through the ResultSet, get the objects and set them in a data structure.
Does anybody know the reason of unexpected time difference for the business logic in the second case?

Since you're mentioning clustering your index, I'll assume you are using Oracle. Knowing what database you are using makes it a lot easier to suggest things.
Since you are using Oracle, you can get the database to tell you what execution plan it is using for each of the 2 SQL statements, and figure out why they have similar times (if they do).
First, you need to be able to run SQL*Plus; that comes as part of a standard database installation and as part of the Oracle client installation - getting it set up and running is outside the scope of this forum.
Second, you may need your DBA to enable autotracing, if it's not already:
http://asktom.oracle.com/~tkyte/article1/autotrace.html
http://www.samoratech.com/tips/swenableautotrace.htm
Once it's all set up, you can log in to your database using sql*plus, issue "SET AUTOTRACE ON", issue queries and get execution plan information back.
For example:
SQL> set autotrace on
SQL> select count(*) from it.ticket where ticket_number between 10 and 20;
COUNT(*)
        11
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2983758974
| Id | Operation         | Name       | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |            |     1 |     4 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE   |            |     1 |     4 |            |          |
|* 2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN| TICKET_N10 |    12 |    48 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("TICKET_NUMBER">=10 AND "TICKET_NUMBER"<=20)
Statistics
          0 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
          1 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
        515 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        469 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
          1 rows processed
SQL> This tells me that this query used an INDEX RANGE SCAN on index TICKET_N1; the query can't do much better than that logically... In fact, the statistic "1 consistent gets" tells me that Oracle had to examine only one data block to get the answer, also can't do better than that. the statistic, "0 physical reads" tells me that the 1 data block used was already cached in Oracle's memory.
the above is from Oracle 10g; autotrace is available back to at least 8i, but they've been adding information to the output with each release.
If you have questions about sql_plus, check the forums at asktom.oracle.com or http://forums.oracle.com/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=18
since sql*plus is not a JDBC thing...
Oh, and sql*plus can also give you easier access to timing information, with "set timing on".

SQL query in SQL_REDO Logminor showing where clause with ROWID

SQL query in SQL_REDO Logminor showing where clause with ROWID. I dont wanted to use rowid but wanted to use actual value.
OPERATION SQL_REDO SQL_UNDO
DELETE delete from "OE"."ORDERS" insert into "OE"."ORDERS"
where "ORDER_ID" = '2413' ("ORDER_ID","ORDER_MODE",
and "ORDER_MODE" = 'direct' "CUSTOMER_ID","ORDER_STATUS",
and "CUSTOMER_ID" = '101' "ORDER_TOTAL","SALES_REP_ID",
and "ORDER_STATUS" = '5' "PROMOTION_ID")
and "ORDER_TOTAL" = '48552' values ('2413','direct','101',
and "SALES_REP_ID" = '161' '5','48552','161',NULL);
and "PROMOTION_ID" IS NULL
and ROWID = 'AAAHTCAABAAAZAPAAN';
DELETE delete from "OE"."ORDERS" insert into "OE"."ORDERS"
where "ORDER_ID" = '2430' ("ORDER_ID","ORDER_MODE",
and "ORDER_MODE" = 'direct' "CUSTOMER_ID","ORDER_STATUS",
and "CUSTOMER_ID" = '101' "ORDER_TOTAL","SALES_REP_ID",
and "ORDER_STATUS" = '8' "PROMOTION_ID")
and "ORDER_TOTAL" = '29669.9' values('2430','direct','101',
and "SALES_REP_ID" = '159' '8','29669.9','159',NULL);
and "PROMOTION_ID" IS NULL
and ROWID = 'AAAHTCAABAAAZAPAAe';
Please let me know solution/document which will convert SQL redo rowid value with actual value.
Thanks,

Please enclose your output within tag so that people here can read it easily and help you. Also the reason that why you want to remove rowid?
Salman
Edited by: Salman Qureshi on Mar 20, 2013 3:53 PM

Where clause with a combination of And and Or statements - Basic question

Hi,
I have a where clause with a combination of And and Or statements... May I know which one would run first
Here is the sample
WHERE SITE_NAME = 'Q' AND ET_NAME IN ('12', '15') AND TEST_DATE > DATE OR SITE_NAME = 'E' AND ET_NAME IN ('19', '20')
can you please explain how this combination works
Thanks in advance

Hi,
This reminds me of a great story. It's so good, it probably didn't really happen, but it's so good, I'm going to repeat it anyway.
IBM once had an "executive apptitude test" that they would give to job applicants. There were some questions you might call general knowlege or trivia questions, and each question had a weight (for example, answering an unimportant queestion might score one point, an important question might be 5 points.) One of the questions was "What is the standard width of a mobile home?", and the weight of the question was -20: answering the question correctly did serious harm to your score. The reasoning was that the more you knew about mobile homes, the less likely you were to be their kind of executive.
Now, as to your question, the correct answer is: I don't know. I don't want to know. Mixing ANDs and ORs without grouping them in parentheses is a really bad idea. Even if you get it right, it's going to confuse the next person who has to look at that code. Use parentheses to make sure the code is doing what you want it to do.
If you really want to find out, it's documented in the SQL language manual. Look up "Operators, prcedence"
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e26088/operators001.htm#sthref815
You can easily do an experiment, using scott.emp, or even dual, where
WHERE (x AND y)
OR      zproduces different results from
WHERE   x
AND     (y OR z)

Using where clause with hardcode value in execute immediate

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for