UTA200-TM Firmware 1.01.08 timestamp bug

I am using T-Mobile @home service. I was given an UTA200-TM HiPort Adapter.
Firmware 1.01.08 has a major timestamp bug.
Status: Current Time: Not Available
I tried flashing fimware 1.01.04.
Status: Current Time: Came up with correct date and time.
Firmware 1.01.04 timestamp works perfectly.
However, the UTA200-TM reflashes itself to 1.01.08. How aggravating!

Tech Support:
The UTA200-TM hardware is not the problem.
The problem is that there is a major flaw in the time-stamp under firmware version 1.01.08:
“Status-Router-Current Time: Not Available”.
Under firmware version 1.01.04:
“Status-Router-Current Time: Correct Date and Time”.
Further testing:
Kbhonline did some troubleshooting and he figured out the flaw even deeper.
When you assign a static address to the WAN port, the time service, for some reason does not operate.
Just for fun he set the UTA200-TM to act as a DHCP client, rebooted and, voila, it all came up, including the time.
He then started to make my changes, one change at a time and reboot.
When he changed the WAN setting from DHCP to Static, no time request went outbound.
All other services worked fine, just no correct time.

Similar Messages

Horrible iMovie 10 timestamp bug

Ok, this is a good one. I've just noticed that iMovie 10 uses the file creation time of a clip as the clip timestamp, rather than the timestamp embedded in the file itself.
For example, I'm looking at a clip that was filmed on 1/4/2009 8:52am. I add the 'time/date' title to the clip, and it displays '3/30/2009 10:01pm'. Why? Because that is the date that the file was *created* on my local filesystem.
The previous version of iMovie did not have this issue. Anyone else notice this?

I switched back to iMovie 09 as well. This timestamp bug is unacceptable. But what is "even" worse for me is that Apple removed the ability to have Project and Event folders. Now every Project is in one big Library file, so there is no way to separate out types of projects (like Family, Vacations, etc.). This is a major issue and breakes my complete work-flow. I use folders heavily with my library that dates back 10+ years.
I am wondering that not many others seem to complain about missing folders. Maybe that is that reason that Apple thought. Hah - "nobody" is using this anway. Let's ditch this feature in iMovie 10 without any explaination or work-around. https://discussions.apple.com/message/23489726#23489726

Firmware update reduced features, increased bugs 2...

Hello, i updated my Nokia 2700c firmware last night in the hopes that it might get rid of some bugs that i found very irritating after the last forced update by the Nokia care (after a problem with the phone, instead of reinstalling the same version they updated it instead).
But the bugs have now grown in number as well as a bit more serious now.
--The phone now doesn't read the name of a contact, in the from field in sms or call list which has more than one number saved or even randomly, some numbers have it displayed, some don't.
--The media player starts playing a song after a 5sec lag in which the phone is unusable, like if i am texting at the same time, it would stop responding,
this becomes worse by the balance notifications after every sms by my operator, in which case it notifies by sounding the sms tone 2 times but now with a 5sec gap in between while playing music, thus making the fone pretty much useless for those 15secs.
--The screensaver functionality is gone.
--The main menu has a menu option repeated one more time, which i never used in the first place.
--The T9 text entry has a lot of bugs with the order of matched words.
--The transition effects have all gone slow, thus prompting me to switch them off.
I can live with the last four but the first 2 i've listed have completely turned me off. Why isn't adequate testin done before releasing an update?
The first version of the device was 7.15, which was updated to 7.80 and this latest one is v9.95(?) i guess they even typoed the version number in this one (9 instead of 7) cause it doesn't look like such a major 'upgrade'.
Please tell me is there any solution to these problems?? Or am i stuck with these bugs for good?
Thanks.

Update: Managed to fix the second issue by a hard reset.

5800 XM Firmware 11.0.0.8 bugs

Hello
my previous firmware didn't have any but but i've put the newer version to see if the performance is better, but now i'm disappointed actually:
1- you accelerometer response is too slow (it was faster before)
2- when I'm in the desktop main page and i'm grabbing the mobile horizontally, and when i try to open the menu, the menu screen doesn't appear correctly.
3- the worst bug is the " EXPIRED CERTIFICATE " which you really have to fix ASAP NOKIA.
4- probably other users are encountering other problems as well.
above all, you should be working harder and better because you are Nokia and we( your customers ) deserve better...
Thanks .

18-Jan-2009 06:24 PM
vahram wrote:
Hello
my previous firmware didn't have any but but i've put the newer version to see if the performance is better, but now i'm disappointed actually:
1- you accelerometer response is too slow (it was faster before)
2- when I'm in the desktop main page and i'm grabbing the mobile horizontally, and when i try to open the menu, the menu screen doesn't appear correctly.
3- the worst bug is the " EXPIRED CERTIFICATE " which you really have to fix ASAP NOKIA.
4- probably other users are encountering other problems as well.
above all, you should be working harder and better because you are Nokia and we( your customers ) deserve better...
Thanks .
There is an easy fix for the 'EXPIRED CERTIFICATE' error. The reason you get this error, as i did, is because when you upgrade the firmware, it messes with the time and date on your phone (you might recall having to set the time & date correctly again after update completion). I read somewhere that it had something to do with the sim-clock or something (dont quote me on that as i'm not 100% sure that its the sim-clock lol). But anyway, it should be an easy firmware fix which nokia will hopefully sort out very soon.
Here's how to fix the 'expired certificate' problem after updating your firmware to v11.0.08:
1) back up all your files using Nokia PC Suite ie. contacts, pictures, videos etc.(i would also remove the memory card, it might not be necssary, but better be safe )
2) Once data has been backed up....you need to reset your phone to its original factory settings by dialing *#7370# (it will ask you if you would like to restore to original factory settings, you will choose 'yes' and enter the default passcode '12345' and your phone will restart)
3) Once the phone has restarted, choose your location just like you did when you started up your phone for the very first time, and then set the correct date and time.
4) All done, and the 'expired certificate' problem should be gone and you can re-insert the memory card if you have taken it out and restore all your backed-up files back onto your device.
Let me know if this has worked for you.
Message Edited by dan2007h on 20-Jan-2009 07:25 AM

N80IE Firmware 4.0707.0.7 bugs

Can anybody please advise on when Nokia will fix the bugs already identified in N80IE firmware 4.0707.0.7? Things are no longer OK with my phone since I "upgraded" to this new firmware and most frustrating, I can no longer access my credit balance by doing something like *123# anymore.

I myself report the bug on my N80 and I hate Nokia team that luch such a disaster.Moreover, they should stop this firmware because causes many troubles to so many Nokia fans. I can not see my balance, I receive system error..Nokia wake up!! Do something!
World in zugzwang!

Latest E51 Firmware 200.34.36: minor bug found

Hello, I have found a little bug; unfortunately I don't know, if it's also on the initial firmware, but the 200.34.36 does have it.
If I have my SD card inserted (8 GB, with quite many MP3 and WMA files), it's not possible to set the system sounds, like ringing tone, mail tone and so on.
While opening the respective menu, instead of seeing of the usual sound clips list, I see only "Download sounds" and "Off".
I think, the e51 isn't able to enumerate the complete list?...
While the SD card isn't inserted, the lists work as they should.

maybe I am wrong but I can not see the similarity with your computer. when you install a new disk you install a lot more hardware than just the disk itself.
I use many professional devices that work with memory cards and they all have a maximum for which the manufacturer guarantees the device to work. If you install higher capacity cards you may expect problems. Because the devices needs to access the memory card which is a completely different process than when a computer wants to access it's hard disk.
There are even differences in different brands of cards. Some brands may produce a 8 GB card that works with a certain device others produce a card that does not work. When you upgrade your firmware and you get a problem as soon as you insert your card, it is very likely that the card is the issue.
I would suggest to try a 4 GB card and see if the problem persists. If not you know the answer. You can alternatively try different brands of 8 GB cards.

Timestamp bug ?

Hi,
We recently installed a DB onto a Windows machine running 10.2. The database and client app were previously running fine on Solaris with 10.1 for last several months.
We have a query that selects columns and does a "order by" on a timestamp column. Even if there are only a few (< 300) rows returned the query takes hours(?) to finish. If i remove the "order by" the query runs great and if I order by a different column it also runs great. By great, i mean a second or two.
Also, if I change my select to be
select cast(timecol as date) ..... order by 1
, it runs quickly again... except that I just lost my milliseconds, of course!
So, the timestamp type is looking pretty suspicious.
This query worked fine on the old system for months. And similar queries on that table, but again without the "order by" clause, run great on the new install.
So, I'm really suspecting the timestamp "order by" being some sort of problem on Windows/10.2
Anyone see this kind of problem before?
Thanks in advance.

There is some bug with timestamp in 10.2.0.1, try to upgrade to 10.2.0.2 patchset.
Nicolas.

RV180W Firmware 1.0.2.6 bug

Our company own a RV180W router. It works well with firmware 1.0.1.9 but with firmware 1.0.2.6 it is impossible to SSH between our devices. Ping still works though.
I don't know if there is another place where to report such bugs

Hi Dominique, thanks for using our forum, my name is Johnnatan and I am part of the Small business Support community. Please call the Small Business Support Center to confirm if this is a bug. Please go here to find the phone number in your country:
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html
I hope you find this answer useful,
“Please rate useful posts so other users can benefit from it”
Greetings,
Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.
Cisco Network Support Engineer.

WAP4410N firmware 2.0.4.2 bug: 300Mbps data rate not possible

I've spent parts of the past five days buying and exchanging several WAP4410N units because I was not able to achieve anything close to a 300Mbps data rate. I also tried various wireless-n network cards which were known to be configured correctly for 300Mbps speeds with no luck.
The highest speed I was able to achieve was 130Mbps, which is an indication that channel bonding is not in effect.
Then I came across another post in the forums:
WAP4410N does not exceed 130Mbps in N mode at close range.
where the OP mentions recently upgrading to firmware 2.0.4.2, though not treating that as the cause of his problems.
On a lark, I tried downgrading to both firmware 2.0.2.1 and firmware 2.0.3.3, and to my surprise, I was able to achieve the full 300Mbps data rate with both firmware versions.
When I reverted back to 2.0.4.2, I was not able to achieve the full 300Mbps data rate.
So, right now, I downgraded to firmware 2.0.3.3 so I can get the higher data rate, though there are other quirks to deal with.
Furthermore, when I do a web search of reviews, I can see that the inability to achieve the 300Mbps data rate is a huge source of complaints.
Cisco, please fix this firmware!
Edited to add: I found another post regarding the same phenomenon:
WAP4410n LIMITED TO 130Mbs in N-mode

Hi James,
When I bought the WAP4410N I was still using Vista and a beta of Windows 7 x64. My PC was reporting 300Mbps but I never believed it and just figured this was better then the Linksys Wap54g with DD-WRT. I was only showing 54Mbps on my laptops but the amount of data I could download over a minute was better then the WAP4410N. The best speed I can achieve (but only lasts a few minutes) is 130Mbps from the WAP4410N and downloads are painfully slow. Using a desktop gadget "network meter" on one of my desktop PCs with a wireless N USB adapter it is showing a speed of 54Mbps and a signal strength of 70% at a distance of 4 feet from the WAP4410N. At this distance I also experience interruptions in connection and poor performance. I do not know if my WAP4410N is defective but a beta firmware is to be released this month that is supposed to help. I have had to recommend other brands in this price range to those wishing to buy a stable product as this performance is not acceptable. My network is mostly GigaLan devices and strangely the intelligent switch reports the WAP4410N as running at 100Mbps with the firmware set the 1000Mbps so there is another mystery.
Best regards,
Brad

Can't change decimal sign in timestamp BUG

It's impossible to change the decimal sign inside a timestamp indicator.
It will always revert to the system default.
The formatter %<%3u>T will return:
The formatter %<%.;%3u>T will return:
The formatter %.;%<%3u>T will return:
Could someone at NI return a car or workaround?
While I was hoping for
.000
Thanks in advance,
Ton
Message Edited by TonP on 02-01-2008 10:07 AM
Free Code Capture Tool! Version 2.1.3 with comments, web-upload, back-save and snippets!
Nederlandse LabVIEW user groep www.lvug.nl
My LabVIEW Ideas
LabVIEW, programming like it should be!
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
,outside.png ‏2 KB
Normal_Wrong.png ‏2 KB
,inside.png ‏2 KB

Thanks Michel,
It's nice to see there's a Localization Manager! thumbs up!
I am pretty happy with the current state of localization. (this one came up because of another user's question)
Ton
Free Code Capture Tool! Version 2.1.3 with comments, web-upload, back-save and snippets!
Nederlandse LabVIEW user groep www.lvug.nl
My LabVIEW Ideas
LabVIEW, programming like it should be!

LR CC 2015 batch editing timestamp bug

I'm running LR CC 2015 on a 27" retina iMac and when I try to batch edit timestamps, it only updates the timestamp of the first photo selected. Here the steps to reproduce:
1) Select 2 or more photos
2) Under metadata click the button to the right of Capture Time
3) In the Edit Capture Time dialog box, select the radio "Shift by set number of hours (time zone adjust)"
4) Click the drop down in the right side of the New Time box and select -19 hours as the time offset.
5) Click change
Expected behavior:
All the photos selected in step 1 should have their timestamps by -19 hours
Actual behavior:
Only the first photo of the set selected in step 1 has its timestamp adjusted.

Turn AutoSync on.
Click the switch next to the Sync button

WVC210 firmware 1.1.0.12 bug

Hello experts,
I updated my WVC210 firmware from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0 and now I have two big problems.
With 1.0.0 I used to let the camera ON (always, 24 hrs a day), and I used to shut down my router during the night.
In the morning I used to set to ON the router and the WVC210 (wireless connected) automatically linked to the router and to DynDNS (so that I was able to reach the camera both from my LAN and from the internet).
1. Now with 1.1.0 the WVC210 (always ON) doesn't automatically connect to the wireless when I restart my router: I always need to start the router first and then to restart the camera;
2. the DynDNS doesn't update automatically as before happened (I need to do as describet on point 1. ...router first, then webcam).
What's wrong?
Thankyou so much
- Enrico

Hi Enrico,
Recommend you post your issue in the Small Business Support Community here: https://www.myciscocommunity.com/community/smallbizsupport/securityandsurveillance/surveillance;jsessionid=F18EAC90A152CC8FA3AD68156729796D.node0.
This Challenges forum is not as likely to provide a response.
Thanks,
Stephanie Reaves
Cisco Small Business

Really Old Bug, no fix

I was searching for the solution to my timestamp bug and found a topic in the archive "UTA200-TM Firmware 1.01.08 timestamp bug". The problem is, the firmware with the bug is 1.01.08, which is the "latest" version of the firmware.
Will this bug ever get fixed? Are there other bugs? Like the phone log being blank, even after a phone call is place, recieved, and missed?

Try to call your phone provider they probably have new update for the software since this is bundled with TMobile.

SPA514G: BLA, re-SUBSCRIBE record-route is broken (firmware bug?)

I have a BLF configured on SPA514G as "fnc=blf+sd+cp;sub=201@$proxy".
The proxy forwards SUBSCRIBE to our presence server.
The "200 OK" on SUBSCRIBE and the NOTIFY to SPA contains record-route.
When the SPA re-SUBSCRIBE, it sends directly to the presence server from contact header.
The route header is correct.
The PROXY is dual-homed:
192.168.3.15 -> 192.168.3.3 --- 192.168.2.3 -> 192.168.2.5
SPA514G ---------------- PROXY -------------- PRESENCE
I've tested firmware 7.5.6a and 7.5.2b.
Partial trace:
192.168.3.15:5060 -> 192.168.3.3:5060
SUBSCRIBE sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.3.15:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-6df8985a
From: "Cisco" <sip:[email protected]>;tag=2d763ae2f27077d6
To: <sip:[email protected]>
Contact: "Cisco" <sip:[email protected]:5060>
Event: dialog
User-Agent: Cisco/SPA514G-7.5.2b
192.168.3.3:5060 -> 192.168.3.15:5060
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Record-Route: <sip:192.168.2.3;r2=on;lr;ftag=2d763ae2f27077d6>
Record-Route: <sip:192.168.3.3;r2=on;lr;ftag=2d763ae2f27077d6>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.3.15:5060;rport=5060;received=192.168.3.15;branch=z9hG4bK-6df8985a
From: "Cisco" <sip:[email protected]>;tag=2d763ae2f27077d6
To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=57902af3e183b228161407cf3808f4bc-81e5
Contact: <sip:192.168.2.5:5060>
192.168.3.3:5060 -> 192.168.3.15:5060
NOTIFY sip:[email protected]:5060 SIP/2.0
Record-Route: <sip:192.168.3.3;r2=on;lr;ftag=57902af3e183b228161407cf3808f4bc-81e5>
Record-Route: <sip:192.168.2.3;r2=on;lr;ftag=57902af3e183b228161407cf3808f4bc-81e5>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.3.3;branch=z9hG4bK06a2.97fdfb93.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.5:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK06a2.6e6e2853.0
To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=2d763ae2f27077d6
From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=57902af3e183b228161407cf3808f4bc-81e5
Event: dialog
Contact: <sip:192.168.2.5:5060>
Subscription-State: active;expires=180
Content-Type: application/dialog-info+xml
192.168.3.15:5060 -> 192.168.3.3:5060
SIP/2.0 200 OK
To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=2d763ae2f27077d6
From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=57902af3e183b228161407cf3808f4bc-81e5
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.3.3;branch=z9hG4bK06a2.97fdfb93.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.5:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK06a2.6e6e2853.0
Record-Route: <sip:192.168.3.3;r2=on;lr;ftag=57902af3e183b228161407cf3808f4bc-81e5>
Record-Route: <sip:192.168.2.3;r2=on;lr;ftag=57902af3e183b228161407cf3808f4bc-81e5>
192.168.3.15:5060 -> 192.168.2.5:5060 <--------- Should use PROXY (192.168.3.3)
SUBSCRIBE sip:192.168.2.5:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.3.15:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-f35b1d45
From: "Cisco" <sip:[email protected]>;tag=2d763ae2f27077d6
To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=57902af3e183b228161407cf3808f4bc-81e5
Route: <sip:192.168.3.3;r2=on;lr;ftag=2d763ae2f27077d6>, <sip:192.168.2.3;r2=on;lr;ftag=2d763ae2f27077d6>
Contact: "Cisco" <sip:[email protected]:5060>
Event: dialog

Release notes say it is fixed in 7.5.7, didn't test myself yet.
SPA50x/30x/51x Firmware Release 7.5.7
=====================================
Bug Fixes and changes since 7.5.6
=================================
- CSCur27078 - SPA514G - BLF is broken in firmware 7.5.6

Zen bug reports... where to submit? Firmware & Media Explorer bugs

There seem to be two rather annoying bugs (actually, three, but the firmware ones are closely related) - there should be a separate forum for bug submission...
The firmware bugs are related to the embedded graphics and are present in the updated firmware, too.
The first bug: embedding a graphic in an MP3 properly, with tested tools such as ID3Tagger, works fine in any player supporting the image display - but Zen will *not* display the graphic unless the header's "Album" field is filled, too. If the "Album" field is empty in ID3v2 (or v), Zen will never display the graphic.
The second bug seems related to this: if the "Album" field has the same value in more than one file in the same directory (or playlist), Zen will only use the first indexed graphic for all those files. As a result, right now I have 0 various Star Wars themes in my Zen, each file with a different graphic embedded in it - and yet Zen shows the same graphics in all of them.
The third bug is in the Media Explorer: every time the player is plugged, CTPlyLsU.exe loads. But very often, it will load as a new process each time - and it will NOT be terminated after the player is disconnected, but it will stay in the memory! When that happens, every time the player is detected again, a new instance of the process will be started and used. I plugged the player in 0 times yesterday, and I had 0 instances of that process devouring the resources.

The third bug is in the Media Explorer: every time the player is plugged, CTPlyLsU.exe loads. But very often, it will load as a new process each time - and it will NOT be terminated after the player is disconnected, but it will stay in the memory! When that happens, every time the player is detected again, a new instance of the process will be started and used. I plugged the player in 0 times yesterday, and I had 0 instances of that process devouring the resources.
Strange, CTPlyLsU.exe is on my system but based on the task manager it doesn't load at all when the player is connected and everything works fine.Message Edited by jpalm on 0-30-200709:6 AM

UTA200-TM Firmware 1.01.08 timestamp bug

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for