Utilizing the Standard Local Route Group with CER

Hello,
I'm running UCM 7.1(2) and recently a contractor we brought in to install our CER 7.0(1) created a very signicicant amount of Calling Search Spaces, Route Patterns, Partitions, Route Lists and Route Groups in an effort to route calls from our 6 sites (we are centrilized with one Publisher and 6 suscribers) out the correct gateway towards the correct PSAP.
I took the contractor's word that we needed to make such drastic additions and now I belive I made the wrong choice. We already have a Route List (PSTN_RL) that includes:
1)Standard Local Route Group
2) XX_RG (the backup RG)
3) XX_RG (another backup RG)
Most of my Directory Numbers (DN) and the Primary CER Route Point belong to one Partition (PhoneLines_PT) and I would like all the calls from the Directory Numbers associated with the PhoneLines_PT to be routed via the Route List that utilizes the Standard Local Route Group (PSTN_RL) and maintain that CER is able to "see" 911 calls.
Can anyone tell me if I I change the PSTN_RL (Standard Local RG) associated Route Pattern Partitions to the PhoneLines_PT, will all Directory Numbers associated with the PhoneLines_PT route calls over the PSTN_RL?
I guess I am trying to wrap a sort of reverse implementation "around my head."
Thanks in advance for you time.

Partition and Calling Search Space (CSS) are closely related but always confused.
Good examples are:
Line A and Line B in the same partition doesn't necessarily mean Line A can call Line B.
Phone A and Phone B have the same CSS doesn't necessarily mean Phone A can call Phone B.
Now back to the topic of LRG (Local Route Group).  A good use case would be 911 calls.  We always want 911 calls to be routed through local gateway so it can reach local PSAP.  Without LRG, you'll have to configure multiple 911 patterns (in different partitions) so you can assoicate them with different gateways.  With LRG, you just need one 911 route pattern.  Of couse that route pattern should be accessible by everyone.  To make it simple, you may put it in null partition.
Michael
http://htluo.blogspot.com

Similar Messages

  • MGCP/Standard Local Route Group List question

    Hello all,
    Here is the scenario:
    Site A - CUCM Pub/Sub / MGCP gateway
    Site B - CUCM Sub / MGCP gateway
    Site C - CUCM Sub / MGCP gateway
    The sites are using the standard local route group with TEHO per location. Site A (HQ) has s discount carrier for LD, and therefore it would be cost effective to backhaul the LD from Site B and Site C to the Site A PRIs.
    Can this be accomplished while using Standard Local Route Groups or is it necessary to go back to site specific routing?
    Thanks,
    JN                

    In CUCM 9 and older you can only have a single local route group per device pool (this changed on version 10), so you will either have to define the Local or LD RG as your Local Route group and then use standard route patterns/route lists/route group configuration for the other calls, so at site B you would have (assuming local route group is local trunks):
    Local Pattern --> Standard Local RL
    911 pattern --> Standard Local RL
    LD pattern --> SiteB LD RL
    Intl pattern --> SiteB LD RL
    etc
    HTH,
    Chris

  • Matching Route Patterns with standard Local Route group and Specific Route Group

    Hi
    I have a customer with CUCM 8.6 with few branches
    couple of branches in UK and few in Europe and middle east.
    I configured route patterns with Standard local route group, but using their own Voice gateway, everything was working fine until adding the recent branch with matching pattern 
    UK has a mobile pattern with 9.07XXXXXXXXX (11 digits)
    One Branch has a mobile with 9.07XXXXXXXX (10 digits)
    When branch call 907X..(10digit) number there was a delay and I ticked the Urgent priority to process it quicker, but later realized the UK branch cannot dial 907x.. (11Digit) mobile.
    I created Route List for branch and added the 10 digit pattern to that but still the UK cannot call 11 digit. so i believe when you call out it will check the pattern first and the Route-List and Route-Group and gateway play a part.
    Is there a way to get 07 -10digit call out quickly also allowing the 07 -11digit pattern as well ( without changing the T302 timer)
    Really appreciate your support
    thanks
    shameer

    Yes, they key to managing overlapping centralized dial plans is to be really good with patterns, partitions, and CSSs. You can have 3 different 9.0[2-9]XX-[2-9]XX-XXXX patterns and assign them a different partition, and then assign that to the branch CSS. This will only work if each Branch has a different CSS.
    For example:
    9.0[2-9]XX-[2-9]XX-XXXX @ Egypt-PT ->Routes to Local route group of Egypt.
    9.0[2-9]XX-[2-9]XX-XXX @ UK-PT -> Routes to Local route group of UK
    9.0[2-9]XX-[2-9]XX-XXX @ Germany-PT -> Routes to Local Route group of Germany.
    //PT = partition//
    Then have Egypt-CSS that contains 9.0[2-9]XX-[2-9]XX-XXXX @ Egypt-PT. 
    UK-CSS contains 9.0[2-9]XX-[2-9]XX-XXX @ UK-PT
    Germany- CSS contains 9.0[2-9]XX-[2-9]XX-XXX @ UK-PT
    The other patterns will be invisible to your sites because they are in a different partition that is not in their CSS. 2 overlapping patterns in the same PT will cause you to wait for the inter-digit timeout unless you press #.
    Thanks,
    Frank

  • TEHO with Local Routing Group

    Hi,
    I was watching an online training video of setting TEHO using Local Routing Group on CUCM 8.6. However somehow I think he configured it wrong.
    In his example,
    He used a centralized call processing infrastructure for NY (hosts the CUCM) and CA offices. NY and CA router groups are created to contain local gateways respecitively and also assigned to corresponding device pool. When configuring Route List for the remote patterns (Pattern to reach CA numbers from NY, vice versa), he only created one RL for both patterns and only added the Standard Local Route Group to the RL… Then wrap up the configure.
    To me, in order to make TEHO work, there should be one RL for each location (one for NY and one for CA) and the NY route group needs to be added into the CA RL and CA Route group needs to be added into NY RL and both RL has SLRG as secondary option.
    Am I crazy or the video did it wrong...

    Good catch, with what is described here, when someone in CA calls a number in CA, the CA route list would be matched and the route list would be selected which contains Standard Local Route Group (SLRG) and the device pool for CA would be checked and the CA route group would be selected.  That works as expected.  Now if a CA phone calls a NY number, the route pattern would be matched, the route list the route pattern points to would be SLRG, so the device pool of the originating device would be checked.  The CA device pool being that a CA phone placed the call would be checked for the local route group and that would be set for a CA route group, so the call would go out of a CA gateway.
    What usually is done is that the route list for TEHO for the CA phone would contain, the NY route group and then SLRG in that order.  That way the call would be extended to NY first out their local gateway for TEHO and then extended to the CA local gateway if the NY gateway fails.  For NY to CA TEHO, the CA route group would be added to another route list, this time with the CA gateway first in the list followed by SLRG.

  • CUCM 10.5 Local Route Group

    When utilizing the local route group for a device pool, when a change is made for that device pool, does a reset of the devices have to occur for the changes to go into affect?  The reason I ask is if you are simply making the change to the Route List there is no interruption to the end users, but what if a location's Long Distance is pointing to a Route List that references a Local Route Group.  If you want move that to another route group under the device pool is there any impact on the phones in that device pool?
    Thanks,
    Joe

    So What you ask is if you modified the route list (change the actual local route Group for other route group) will reset the phones ? as far as I now no change on rl will reset phone but change on dp will..

  • UCCX Redirect Step and Local Route Groups

    Hello,
    CUCM 9.1.2
    UCCX 9.0
    I have come across a situation in one of our UCCX scripts with the call redirect step where it is forwarded to a local cell phone for after hours calls. The number in the Call Redirect step is 9, followed by the 10-digit number of the cell.
    While the call does redirect successfully from the UCCX script, the call always uses the local route group of the original calling party's device. So, if the call from an IP Phone to the cell is going out the gateway where the cell number is a local call, the 9 followed by the 10 digit number works fine.
    If it's a site across the WAN, the call redirect to the cell fails because it's using LRG of the calling party's phone and thus it needs to be a long distance call.
    I kind of thought the Service Parameter Local route group for redirected calls being set to "Local route group of last redirecting party" might have addressed this, like it did for call forward all situations, but it does not seem to be the case.
    Would the recommendation be to use Call Consult Transfer instead of the Call Redirect step? This seems to work, but was wondering if there were other ways to approach it.
    Thanks for your help,
    Frank

    Hi Anthony,
    Thanks for the reply. The Call Consult Transfer step did resolve my issue, so now the call is always coming from the local site and using the LRG of the DP of the CTI ports. I previously had it set up using the Call Redirect step in the script with 9 followed by the 10-digit number, and thus it was kind of not working when calling over the WAN from remote sites.
    I should have mentioned that we recently did an CUCM / CCX upgrade. In CUCM, all call restrictions were previously done at the device level, nothing on the line. Now we have the line doing the call restrictions. So the Call Redirect step worked fine in the old environment with the 10-digit number, not so much in the new.
    But I like your suggestion about +E164 even better, since we rolled that into the upgrade as well. I tried putting the full +E164 number in the script using the Call Redirect step. Works perfectly from all sites.
    Thanks for your help.
    Frank

  • Local Route Groups vs translation to E.164

    Hello.
    Can anybody describe local route groups benefits compared to dialplan with translations to E.164?
    Let's see simple scenario. I have 3 sites - MSK, SPB and NSK. All site has phones and a gateway, each site has it's partition for termination (TERM-MSK, TERM-SPB, TERM-NSK) and a partition for translation (XLAT-MSK, XLAT-SPB, XLAT-NSK). There are 2 CSS for translation and termination for each site (CSS-X-MSK, CSS-X-SPB, CSS-X-NSK, CSS-TERM-MSK, CSS-TERM-SPB and CSS-TERM-NSK). All phones has a translation CSS local to it's site configured, for example phones at MSK has CSS-X-MSK in phone configuration. There are translation patterns for translating dialed off-net numbers to E.164 format (7495XXXXXXX for MSK, 7812XXXXXXX for SPB and 7383XXXXXXX for NSK). Subscribers uses 9 for local off-net calls and 90 for long-distance, there are 2 translation patterns with corresponding XLAT partition and CSS-TERM CSS (9.[1-9]XXXXXX -> 7495 prefix plus XXXXXXX and 90.[1-9]XXXXXXXXX -> 7 plus XXXXXXXXXX, partition XLAT-MSK, CSS CSS-TERM-MSK for MSK). CSS-X CSSes has corresponding XLAT partition only. CSS-TERM CSSes has allowed TERM patitions. Each route pattern has corresponding TERM partition and points to single route list with single route group. Finally I have 3 route patterns 3 route lists, 3 route groups, 6 partitions and 6 CSSes total).
    Using Local Route Groups I have the same 3 route patterns, 3 route lists and 3 route groups but one partition and one CSS. Pros for this scheme is less partitions and CSSes. Cons is the loss of flexibility (I can't allow calls to anywhere from MSK and only MSK and NSK for NSK and can't use different prefixes for off-net calls for each office).
    Have I understood the Features and Services Guide rignt? Is there other way to translate dialed off-net number to E.164 without using extra partitions and CSSes (Translatio Pattern requires this)?

    Maxim,
    Local Route Groups have not dependency on e.164 dial plan and vice-versa, there are independent features.  Local Route groups allow you  to consolidate your route patterns/route lists/CSS/PT, depending on complexity of your routing you can accomplish all your remote site routing via a common set of route patterns/list CSS/partitions, so routing decisions are based on local route groups assigned to device pool of the calling device rather than just the CSS.  E.164 dial plan is merely a way to structure dialed numbers, how and where you transform them is up to you, I prefer using transformation patterns vs. translation patterns for example.
    HTH,
    Chris

  • What is the standard method to integreate with AME for the approval process

    I have developed a new OAF page and registered under Employee Self Service menu.
    What is the standard method to integreate with AME for the approval process.
    Appreciate your early response

    Any one used AME with the new OAF pages?
    Please share , how you use AME with OAF page

  • What voltage is the standard memory that comes with 2011 IMacs?

    what voltage is the standard memory that comes with 2011 IMacs?

    1.5V
    Here are specs on RAM from crucial.com.

  • Facebook app is blocked on "waiting..". I tried to close the app firstly but it doesn't appear on the multitasking. I tried the normal and the hard reset. I tried to move the app in another group with itunes but it is still in "waiting". Any suggestion?

    Facebook app is blocked on "waiting..". I tried to close the app firstly but it doesn't appear on the multitasking. I tried the normal and the hard reset. I tried to move the app in another group with itunes but it is still in "waiting". Any suggestion?

    I can't! Tried to deleteit  from the iphone and from itunes but the X doesn't appear!

  • Is Airport Utility the only way to communicate with the Airport Extreme?

    For example on the other routers, you can access the admin control panel by typing 192.168.1.1 in the web browser. Is there a different IP address for this router? How can I get access to the advanced admin settings on a Windows computer (or Mac for that matter)?

    Nope, AirPorts cannot be configured through a web browser. You have to use AirPort Utility.
    Windows computers can also use AirPort Utility. You just have to install it. You can use the CD that came with your AirPort, or you can download AirPort Utility from the Apple website.
    As for "advanced admin settings," try Manual Setup.

  • Replacing the standard Zen Micro HD with a Toshiba PMR 40G

    <FONT face=Century>Toshiba just announced they are shipping their new PMR (Perpendicular Magnetic Recording) Micro Harddri'ves.. This is something I would love to upgrade too. I've already maxed out my 5GB dri've and I want more music.. I wonder when Creative will start shipping out special Zen Micros with these new dri'ves.. Toshiba makes both a 40GB and a 80GB PMR dri've.
    <FONT face=Century>
    http://www.sdd.toshiba.com/
    -Psybermuzak

    It's a .8" dri've so won't fit in the Zen Micro. It will fit in the likes of the Sleek and the Touch though.

  • A question about the standard Nvidia card included with the MacPro

    I am using the Nvivia GeForce 7300 GT video card that came with my MacPro. When in Boot Camp running Window Vista, the Nvidia Control Panel says that the cards output through the digital connection is 1080p. Does this mean that if I play a DVD on the MacPro that it is upconverted to 1080p? Or, does it pass the video through at 480p?

    That is wrong. For one, I have the comupter pluged into a input port in the TV, not an output port. Output ports are for sending the TV signal to another device. Not to accept an input from another device. I am using a DVI>HDMI cable. When my set gets a 480i, 480p, 720p, 1080i or 1080p signal through HDMI it displays it as such on the info screen. Yes my set upgrades all signals to 1080p. I checked with the manufacture. They also told me that if the info screen says that a 1080p signal is being input to it, that is what it will display and if a 480p signal is being input that is what it will display. That is also how it works with my satellite receiver and my TV antenna. I also hooked up an old Toshiba Satellite Laptop to the set and the info screen displayed 480p. The Nvidia card in Apple Mac Pros and Macbook Pros does upconvert.

  • Is RTMT can monitor when the first Route Group of a Route List is not used ?

    Hi everyone,
    I want to find how monitor this event in RTMT without success. I hope someone will have an idea to suggest !
    My problem :
    I have one Route List (RL_Remote) wich is used to route calls between two sites. This Route List has two Route Group :
    - the first is a SIP trunk connected to my remote site (RG_SIP)
    - the second is a local route group wich used PSTN (RG_PSTN) [BACKUP]
    Is it possible that RTMT sends me an alarm when calls are routing via RL_Remote but are not using RG_SIP ?
    In fact, I want to receive an alarm as soon as the Backup Route Group (RG_PSTN in my example) is used.
    Thanks for your help !
    Have a nice day,
    Franck-Emanuel

    More or less correct yes:
    Core Issue
    This issue can occur if an available route is not found in the indicated route list.
    If  the call fails on the current gateway, Cisco CallManager attempts to  extend the call to the next route in the route list. This occurs until  it reaches the last route. If the call cannot be completed with the last  gateway, the Route List Exhausted event is logged.
    These are possible reasons for a failure on the current gateway:
    Unallocated number, such as a non-existing destination
    Busy user
    Out of bandwidth   
    Gateway fails to respond to the call setup request 
    The user receives alerts similar to this in the Real-Time Monitoring Tool (RTMT):
    Most  Recent Alert Raised: At 09:19:27 on 12/21/2005 on cluster  CALLMANAGER1-Cluster. Number of RouteListExhausted events exceed 0  within 60 minutes.
    There  are at least five RouteListExhausted events (up to 30) received during  the monitoring interval from 09:07:27, 12/21/2005 to 10:07:27,  12/21/2005.
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-29032

  • DPM 2012 still requires put end users into local admin groups for the purpose of end user data recovery?

    On client computers that are protected by DPM 2010 and prior versions, you had to put the end users account in the local administrators group. If you did not add the end user account to the local administrators group you would get this error after opening
    the recovery tab in the DPM client: “DPM found no recovery points which you are authorized to restore on the specified DPM server. You can restore only those recovery points for which you were an administrator at the time the
    backup was taken. To restore other recovery points, contact your DPM administrator, or attempt to restore from another DPM.”  This is not ideal on many networks because the end users are not allowed to have local administrator access.
    Ths fix to this was included in hotfix 2465832 found here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2465832.
    This hotfix (a hotfix rollup package for DPM 2010) resolves other issues with DPM 2010 as well. You can find the full list of what this hotfix corrects on that link.
    One would think this issue should have been resolved in DPM 2012, however I am encountering the same exact issue, had to include end-users into the workstation local admin group before they can search for recovery points on the DPM server. This is not acceptable
    practice.
    Is there a new hotfix for the same issue on DPM 2012? I am hesitated to apply KB2465832 since it also includes many other fixes for DPM 2010, which may not appicable for version 2012.
    Please help.
    Thanks,

    This is a hands off solution to allow all users that use a machine to be able to restore their own files.
    1) Make these two cmd files and save them in c:\temp
    2) Using windows scheduler – schedule addperms.cmd to run daily – any new users that log onto the machine will automatically be able to restore their own files.
    <addperms.cmd>
    Cmd.exe /v /c c:\temp\addreg.cmd
    <addreg.cmd>
    set users=
    echo Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00>c:\temp\perms.reg
    echo [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Microsoft Data Protection Manager\Agent\ClientProtection]>>c:\temp\perms.reg
    FOR /F "Tokens=*" %%n IN ('dir c:\users\*. /b') do set users=!users!%Userdomain%\\%%n,
    echo "ClientOwners"=^"%users%%Userdomain%\\bogususer^">>c:\temp\perms.reg
    REG IMPORT c:\temp\perms.reg
    Del c:\temp\perms.reg
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. Regards, Mike J. [MSFT] This
    posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
    That's a good one! Thanks for that.
    I've been scripting on KIX for some time, so here is mine, hope it helps to someone... (it's probably not the best, but it works)
    ========================================================================
    $RC=setoption("WOW64AlternateRegView","on") 
    $DPMkey = "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Microsoft Data Protection Manager\Agent\ClientProtection"
    $uservariable = "%userdomain%\%username%"
    If KeyExist ($DPMkey)
    $Userstring=ReadValue($DPMkey, "ClientOwners")
    If $Userstring == ""
    WriteValue($DPMkey,"ClientOwners", $uservariable, "REG_MULTI_SZ")
    ? "Key created"
    else
    If not instr($Userstring,$uservariable)
    $Userstring = "$Userstring,$uservariable"
    WriteValue($DPMkey,"ClientOwners", $Userstring, "REG_MULTI_SZ")
    EndIf
    Endif
    EndIf
    ==========================================================================
    The problem actually is that you still need to use an admin account to write on the registry, so ensure you configure it properly on the schedule task.
    In case you use a service account on the schedule task... the "$uservariable" will get populated with that account. As a work around to this... I changed it for the following line:
    =========================================================
    $uservariable = ReadValue("HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Authentication\LogonUI", "LastLoggedOnSAMUser")
    =========================================================
    The only problem with that, is that key gets created/updated only if user gets logged phisically on that PC, but will not work for anyone connecting through RDP.

Maybe you are looking for