UTL_TCP port range

Database 11.2.0.3
LINUX 6.4 64BIT
When we use UTL_TCP to connect to a remote host from server_abc or server_xyz, do you know what local port(s) on the server_abc/server_xyz server is used to make the connection?
Thanks

995627 wrote:
Database 11.2.0.3
LINUX 6.4 64BIT
When we use UTL_TCP to connect to a remote host from server_abc or server_xyz, do you know what local port(s) on the server_abc/server_xyz server is used to make the connection?
Thankswhich ever port you specify
TYPE connection IS RECORD (
    remote_host    VARCHAR2(255),
    remote_port    PLS_INTEGER,
    local_host     VARCHAR2(255),
    local_port     PLS_INTEGER,
    charset        VARCHAR2(30),
    newline        VARCHAR2(2),
    tx_timeout     PLS_INTEGER,
    private_sd     PLS_INTEGER);

Similar Messages

Unable to Save in Port Range Forwarding

I'm using the BEFW11S4 wireless router and am unable to save the new port range forwarding settings I have entered. Everytime I click Save Settings, I receive a box which reads:
"The server 192.168.1.1 at Linksys BEFW11S4 V4 requires a username and password.
Warning: This server is requesting that your username and password be sent in an insecure manner (basic authentication without a secure connection)."
When I enter the same u/p that I used to access the router in the first place, it rejects and keeps bringing up the log in screen.
I cannot get the port range forwarding to save at all due to this.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thank you!

try remembering the password you used for first time while installing the router .... if not then use default password admin with out any username ....
If still not working then you need to reset the router ....

Data Transfer Port ranges in FTPS with SSL in File Adapter

Hi,
I would appreciate if you could give me pointers reagrding the below issue.
We are on XI 3.0.
For one interface, I have to configure the FTP File adapter to pick up the files from external server.
The connection is secure and should be FTPS with SSL.
I have the certificate from the 3rd party and have it installed on our XI development server.
The change has been made in our firewall to allow the connection to the host IP and port 21 which is configured at the target party as Explicit FTPS port and they have allowed access to our Server IP in their firewall.
I have configured other FTPS connections and they worked fine but this is the only one that has been giving me so much trouble.
The error i get today is:
Error occurred while connecting to the FTP server "60.234.48.106:21": java.net.SocketException: Connection reset
Yesterday, i got the below error:
Error occurred while connecting to the FTP server "60.234.48.106:21": iaik.security.ssl.SSLException: Server certificate rejected by ChainVerifier
The Vendor has suggested to get the firewall ports 21 and 28000:30000 (data transfer) to be opened.
He has also provided with the certificate passphrase additionally to the user name and password needed to make the connection.
When i tried the connection from the XI development to the vendor server, via the Telnet, it looked like it worked.
Please advice.
Regards,
Archana

>
Archana Singhai wrote:
> Hi,
> I would appreciate if you could give me pointers reagrding the below issue.
> We are on XI 3.0.
> For one interface, I have to configure the FTP File adapter to pick up the files from external server.
> The connection is secure and should be FTPS with SSL.
> I have the certificate from the 3rd party and have it installed on our XI development server.
> The change has been made in our firewall to allow the connection to the host IP and port 21 which is configured at the target party as Explicit FTPS port and they have allowed access to our Server IP in their firewall.
> I have configured other FTPS connections and they worked fine but this is the only one that has been giving me so much trouble.
> The error i get today is:
> Error occurred while connecting to the FTP server "60.234.48.106:21": java.net.SocketException: Connection reset
> Yesterday, i got the below error:
> Error occurred while connecting to the FTP server "60.234.48.106:21": iaik.security.ssl.SSLException: Server certificate rejected by ChainVerifier
> The Vendor has suggested to get the firewall ports 21 and 28000:30000 (data transfer) to be opened.
> He has also provided with the certificate passphrase additionally to the user name and password needed to make the connection.
> When i tried the connection from the XI development to the vendor server, via the Telnet, it looked like it worked.
> Please advice.
> Regards,
> Archana
1. Open the port ranges. FTPS usually requires you to open ports in the range of 65024 through 65535 for Passive FTP data
connections
2. Use the CA name in the certificate. it should be same as of the host name of the FTPS server

NAM 5.1 How to create Application with port range from cli?

Hello,
I can create new Applicaion with port range from GUI, but I can not do it from CLI
If I do it by CLI as a:
nam# application
nam# name mkst-cur-A
nam# match udp 16001-16009
nam# exit
then
nam# show application app-tag 268435576
custom:120 (268435576) mkst-cur-A
udp 16001
nam#
But if I do it by GUI and than
nam# show application app-tag 268435576
custom:120 (268435576) mkst-cur-A
udp 16001 - 16009
nam#
How to do it by CLI?

Hi Alexey,
Sure, the function you're looking for is in the ANALYSIS panel under the "CUrve Fitting" palette-- it's called "Linear Mapping". You will need to create the desired X channel prior to calling this function, though, so you will probably need to use the ANALYIS function "Generate Numeric Channel" in the "Channel Functions" palette.
Brad Turpin
DIAdem Product Support Engineer
National Instruments

OC4J_BPEL no port available from the port range

To All,
We could not start our BPEL Process Manager and OC4J_BPEL. We have shut down and restarted the Linux server repeatedly and re-running the IRCA. All stacks are running except the OC4J_BPEL and BPM.
We keep receiving the following message when we start the BPM:
BPEL Process Manager
OraBPEL : OC4J_BPEL no port available from the port range
OraBPEL : OC4J_BPEL - failed to start a managed process after the maximum retry limit
OC4J_BPEL
OraBPEL : OC4J_BPEL no port available from the port range
OraBPEL : OC4J_BPEL - failed to start a managed process after the maximum retry limit
Our OraBPEL is on a single HP NetServer LH6000 with Red Head AS 3.0, Oracle 10g DB and AS middle tier all in the same machine. The server was running a batch BPEL process. After running 2 hrs and process 12,000 records it was brought down by a single runtime exception. We were able to bring back the Oracle 10g AS middle tier but not the OC4J_BPEL instance. Any help would be appreciated.

I changed the OC4J_BPEL port from 3201 to 3211 fix the problem. It was conflicted with the home instance that is using port 3201. However that still can not get rid of the OC4J-BPEL failed to start a managed process after the maximum retry limit.

OBI11g intallation issue - Error in validating the port range for auto port

I am using the intaller to install OBIEE 11g on my machine. When I get to step 6, I receive the error messages below. Currently I also have OBIEE 10g on my machine so the ports may be already used.
Does any one know how I can resolve this issue? I previously installed both 10g and 11g on my old laptop but I can't figure out why I'm getting these errors this time.
INST-08010: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation. At least 3 ports should be free within the range 9500-9699 for the Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager).
Ensure that a minimum of 3 ports are free within the range 9500-9699 for auto port allocation to work correctly for the Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager).
INST-08012: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation. At least 3 consecutive ports should be free within the range 9500-9699 for the OPMN, in addition to 3 free ports required for Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager).
Ensure that a minimum of 3 consecutive ports are free within the range 9500-9699 for auto port allocation to work correctly for the OPMN, in addition to 3 free ports required for Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager).
INST-08010: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation. At least 9 ports should be free within the range 9700-9999 for the BI System Components.
Ensure that a minimum of 9 ports are free within the range 9700-9999 for auto port allocation to work correctly for the BI System Components.

your hosts file have duplicate name that point to two different IP addresses.
10.37.29.1 test1.xyz.com
10.10.10.1 test1.xyz.com

INST-08010: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation

Hello guys, I am using the installer to install OBIEE 11.1.7.0 on my machine. When I get to step 6, I receive the error messages below:
INST-08010: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation. At least 2 ports should be free within the range 7000-7500 for the Adminserver and Adminserver SSL.
Ensure that a minimum of 2 ports are free within the range 7000-7500 for auto port allocation to work correctly for the Adminserver and Adminserver SSL.
INST-08010: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation. At least 3 ports should be free within the range 9500-9699 for the Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager).
Ensure that a minimum of 3 ports are free within the range 9500-9699 for auto port allocation to work correctly for the Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager).
INST-08012: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation. At least 3 consecutive ports should be free within the range 9500-9699 for the OPMN, in addition to 3 free ports required for Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager).
Ensure that a minimum of 3 consecutive ports are free within the range 9500-9699 for auto port allocation to work correctly for the OPMN, in addition to 3 free ports required for Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager).
My Operating System below:
Linux Red Hat 5.9 X86 64bit
My uname -a are below:
Linux redhat59 2.6.18-348.el5 #1 SMP Wed Nov 28 21:22:00 EST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
My /etc/hosts file are below:
# Do not remove the following line, or various programs
# that require network functionality will fail.
127.0.0.1   localhost.localdomain localhost
10.10.80.19 redhat59
My /etc/sysconfig/network are below:
NETWORKING=yes
NETWORKING_IPV6=no
HOSTNAME=redhat59
GATEWAY=10.174.27.228
My /etc/sysconfig/iptables are below:
# Generated by iptables-save v1.3.5 on Tue Dec 3 17:01:17 2013
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [425:33860]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [307:40164]
COMMIT
# Completed on Tue Dec 3 17:01:17 2013
My ifconfig are below:
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:55:9B:C9
          inet addr:10.174.27.233 Bcast:10.174.27.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
          RX packets:200216 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:95849 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:110668992 (105.5 MiB) TX bytes:209784134 (200.0 MiB)
lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
          inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
          RX packets:109200 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:109200 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:257845896 (245.9 MiB) TX bytes:257845896 (245.9 MiB)
my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 are below:
# Virtio Network Device
DEVICE=eth0
BOOTPROTO=static
BROADCAST=10.174.27.255
HWADDR=52:54:00:55:9B:C9
IPADDR=10.174.27.233
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=10.174.27.0
ONBOOT=yes
Have any suggestion please?
Many Thanks
D

In setDomainEnv.sh set debugFlag=false or you can just remove it.
NodeManager is a charm after that. it can take any number of ports.
Cheers !!

[ERROR]:INST-08010: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation

I am installing OBIEE 11.1.1.7.0 on a linux x86 version. I get the below error when running the installer: [VALIDATION] [ERROR]:INST-08010: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation. At least 2 ports should be free within the range 7000-7500 for the Adminserver and Adminserver SSL. [VALIDATION] [SUGGESTION]:Ensure that a minimum of 2 ports are free within the range 7000-7500 for auto port allocation to work correctly for the Adminserver and Adminserver SSL. [VALIDATION] [ERROR]:INST-08010: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation. At least 3 ports should be free within the range 9500-9699 for the Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager). [VALIDATION] [SUGGESTION]:Ensure that a minimum of 3 ports are free within the range 9500-9699 for auto port allocation to work correctly for the Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager). [VALIDATION] [ERROR]:INST-08012: Error in validating the port range for auto port allocation. At least 3 consecutive ports should be free within the range 9500-9699 for the OPMN, in addition to 3 free ports required for Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager). [VALIDATION] [SUGGESTION]:Ensure that a minimum of 3 consecutive ports are free within the range 9500-9699 for auto port allocation to work correctly for the OPMN, in addition to 3 free ports required for Weblogic Components for BI (WLS Managed Server, Managed Server SSL and NodeManager). installation Failed. Exiting installation due to data validation failure. Solution suggested on other post is below: your hosts file have duplicate name that point to two different IP addresses. 10.37.29.1 test1.xyz.com 10.10.10.1 test1.xyz.com But in my case, My host file has different entiries as shown below: 169.36.71.228 usl20027808.am.hedani.net usl20027808 169.36.72.9 usl2002788.am.hedani.net usl2002788 Please suggest!

In setDomainEnv.sh set debugFlag=false or you can just remove it.
NodeManager is a charm after that. it can take any number of ports.
Cheers !!

Passive FTP Port Range -- Server 10.3.x Panther

I know that the port range for Passive FTP is >1024, but I want to define that to a smaller group of unused ports so that I can specify that those ports are open in the Firewall.
Can, how, and where do I define this port range??

I just opened from 13658-65534 and this seems to be fine (although not been running very long). I took the view that opening a stack of ports was not really any worse than just opening a quarter as much. Arguably, it's no worse than just opening one.
However, we only use it from time to time and FTP services is off unless specifically required. If I was going to run it for serious use I think I would put it on a dedicated server and put it in a DMZ.
Reading up on FTP security is on my To-Do list...
-david
[EDIT] The server is also well locked down for SSH.

What port-range in the firewall of a Socks (e.g. JSocks) server?

Hi there,
I am using the JSocks implementation of a socks v5 server.
Some of my questsions are quite general (not only specific to JSocks) and I hope that someone knows the answer. Unfortunately the forum of JSocks (sourceforge) is only rudymentary so I think this place is better to answer my questions.
However...
As I understand the socks proxy, the server waits on a specific port - normally 1080 and processes the client requests (bind, connect, accept...).
For example one client requests a bind. Then the socks server opens a port locally on the socks host and (if successful) replies the new listening port and ip to the requesting client. ...
(Forget authentication, cascaded proxies and ip-ranges at this point!)
Now, if other clients should be able to access this port, the firewall (if any) needs to allow connection to this port.
My questions:
What should be an adequate port range for the socks proxy? With other words: what is the port range of the new ports that are created for the requesting clients?
How schould a seperate firewall be configured not to conflict with a socks proxy?
Specific to JSocks (if somebody knows this he wins a virtual cookie): What is the port range that JSocks uses if it opens (generates) new ports for its clients?
Where is the port range defined in the jsocks - I havent found any?
Imagine that on the same machine there are other running applications that are listening on predefined ports. (e.g. 8080, 21, ...) - what is the best way to exclude the ports in jsocks?
Any hints and explanations are welcome!
Edited by: krafzig on Oct 28, 2008 8:27 AM

You only need one port.OK, initially I need only - lets say port 1080.
But then for example a client c1 requests a bind. The socks server opens a new socket for the client (e.g. on 50000) and tells the client on which port on the socks he is now listening, right?
In order to allow client c2 to connect to this new port the firewall needs to allow access to the new port (50000) first.
So there are more ports - there might be hundrets or thousands, right?
If its on a seperate box it doesn't matter. If its on the same box it should manage different ports.yes, different ports!
However, it should allow access to the ports that the socks opens for the clients, right?
Optimal would be a dynamic adaptation of the firewall, whenever the socks opens a new port the firewall grants access.
I assume its configurable, so its up to you.No, unfortunately it is not configurable. At least I havent found anything.
Probably won't either.???
Don't use ports already used. `netstat -a` will list all the used port on that box. obviously, and Jsocks allows to configure reusage of ports by flag true/false;
Has anybody setup a socks proxy with a firewall and knows how this is/should be done normally?
Has anybody experiences with JSocks?

Can I open a port range in the firewall for one host?

Can I open a port range in the firewall for one host? In other words, I want to be able to open ports 54001 to 54050 to allow one remote host in my LAN to access that port range in my Mac Server. Is this possible? Currently, the only option I see is to open individual ports for all external hosts (eg http or https)
Thanks in advance!

Which version of OS X Server are you using?
Server 2.2 and earlier includes an interface to a software firewall that can be configured to open specific ports very easily. Descriptions of how to configure the firewall can be found in the documentation for these versions.
Server 3.x no longer has an interface to the software firewall - it is still there, but you need to use other methods do configure it. A popular example of such a method is the icefloor utility.
Apple suggest that for Server 3 you delegate firewall duties to an external router. Server 3 includes the ability to configure the firewall component of Apple Airport routers 'automatically'
if you connect a machine running Server 3 directly to an Airport Router the router appears in the LH pane in the Server.app window (usually second line, below the entry for the server itself), and you can control what services are 'enabled' through the firewall there.
a more common solution perhaps is to use a non-apple router, and configure the firewall (and so open specific ports) through whatever control interface is provided for that router. There are many many kinds of hardware router you could use, and the control interfaces used vary widely - so you will have to consulting the documentation for your own router to work out how to do this.
If you post information about your software versions, and hardware configuration, it is possible that you can get more specific help with the tasks involved in opening the ports.
Hope this helps.

Router won't save settings of Single Port Forward or Port Range Forwarding

Hi everyone, I'm having a bit of trouble tonight trying to get my Playstation 3 to play games online and in doing so I'm attempting to enable Single Port Forwarding and or Port Range Forwarding.
To start, I am using this link below this paragraph as a guide.
http://portforward.com/english/routers/port_forwarding/Cisco/Linksys-E1000/PS3_Endless_Saga.htm
Each time I go and set the settings and click save, it tells me the settings have been saved successfully then when I click continue onto the next page it shows they actually haven't saved at all. My router is out of it's 90 day phone support with Linksys and I refuse to pay anything extra for support so I'm hoping someone else will be able to help me with my issue since they refuse to unless I pay them.

Hello. Sucks you ran into trouble just after PSN got back online
Try clearing your cache / cookies then re-do the settings. Also, try using a different Internet browser.

Oracle 10g database listener port range?

Hi there
Can you share me oracle 10g database listener port range (start port to end port No). default port is 1521
Regards
Jewel
Edited by: user623166 on Jul 31, 2012 10:41 PM

I think you will find your answer in below thread :
listener port number
Osama ..

No Port Available from the port range

Hi, Im getting "no port available from the port range" for the default_group/home/default_group process when I attempt to start opmn. I changed the port no through the application server control panel, and now I cant start opmn to change it back again! Could anyone tell me how to go about changing it back please?
The error report looks like this:
There are some errors while stopping the following components. Refer to the generated error report for more details.
==================================================
ias-component: default_group
process-type: home
process-set: default_group
Error Message:no port available from the port range
==================================================
==================================================
ias-component: default_group
process-type: home
process-set: default_group
Error Message:failed to start a managed process after the maximum retry limit
==================================================
==================================================
ias-component: default_group
process-type: home
process-set: default_group
Error Message:no port available from the port range
==================================================
==================================================
ias-component: default_group
process-type: home
process-set: default_group
Error Message:no port available from the port range
==================================================
Can anyone help?

See the Oracle Application Server Administrator's Guide. Here's a link for the 10.1.2.0.2 version of the book:
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14099_19/core.1012/b13995/ports.htm#i1038905
Helen

ACE FTP inspect with port range

Hi everyone,
I have a problem with passive FTP with fixed port range.
I configured a ftp server with a fixed port range of 60000 - 60500 for the data channel.
And the ace is configured with "inspect ftp" on policy of ftp-serverfarm.
A tcpdump on server I can see that the server uses the portrange in response packet.
(x,x,x,x,34,195) = 60099
But on client I can see that the port on packet is change to another port. The ace is between server and client.
On CCO I found a document "http://www.ciscosystems.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA1_7_/command/reference/policy.html#wp1006925" ->> Enables FTP inspection. The ACE inspects FTP packets, translates the address and the port that are embedded in the payload, and opens up a secondary channel for data.
I don't understand why the ace change the port in ftp payload.
Is it possible to create the same port range on ace configuration of connectio to client?
Thanks
René

You don't need inspect ftp with one server because you can avoid it.
You can for example configure a loopback on the server with the vip address and configure the serverfarm as transparent on ACE.
Then for the data channel, since your range of ports is quite small, you can catch it with a class-map and simply forward to the server.
Like this, the server will use the vip address in all packets exchange with the cleint (no need to nat the payload) and when the client opens a data connection, the traffic is matched with the class-map and the connection can be forwarded to the server using the same transparent serverfarm.
Less chance to run into compatibility issue.
Better performance since we can switch traffic with inspecting its content.
Gilles.

UTL_TCP port range

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for