UWL Status Update

Hi All,
Currently I am working in PCR workflows. All workflows are working fine. I need to update status in UWL. Once any work item is approved or rejected or completed the UWL will NOT update the status.
It always open / process status.
I used BUS7051 and method CHANGE STATUS. It works only in backend system not in UWL.
Can anyone help me with this issue.
Thanks in advance
Thanks - Krish

Hi ,
You are using correct BOR BUS7051 change status , but can you check if you are using correct binding in your task .
If this is correct , then check portal refresh .By default it is 5 min .
Also, use the refresh button on the Status Overview of PCR , and then examine.
hope this solves .
Thanks,
sahiba

Similar Messages

Leave request workitem in UWL status update issue

Hello,
Once manager receives a workitem in their UWL for leave request, the status is NEW.
Now when manager click on that workitem..opens it and closes it without taking any action.
The status must change to "IN PROGRESS".
This does not happen.
Status remain as NEW.
We do not have any issue once Leave is approved or rejected. Workitem gets disappeared appropriately.
Please help me in resolving this issue.

Hello Lukas,
We are on EHP4.
And it uses Java based applications.
Now can you please check in you machine the very same scenario.
Instead of looking at the senders UWL, have a look at the managers UWL.
Where status is displayed as "New".
Open the workitem and close it withpout taking any action.
Then manually refresh your UWL and observe the status. Is it "New" or "In progress".
However we have just recieved a reply from SAP that it is a standard behaviour. And status would remain as New if no action is taken.
But still I am not convinced. As if you open that workitem from Backend Inbox. The status in UWL in portal changes to "In Progress" !
Strange.

Status update for MeeGo on the N900

Here's a copy of the text sent by Harri Hakulinen from Nokia. He is the project lead for MeeGo on the N900. This message was sent to the MeeGo developer mailing list just now:
Hello MeeGos !
This is brief status update of "MeeGo to N900" project. This project is currently running as Nokia project, and I am Nokia project lead for it. The current closed mode of development is not the target for us at all, but rather transitional condition. As already discussed by Valtteri in TSG meeting, we are looking into going more open mode shortly. One reason why we have done this on this way is that at the same time we have been trying to handle opening of many currenly closed components that are needed in MeeGo and to build feasible MeeGo images for N900.
However, a lot of related work is already done completely open, you can find more info from places like ofono.org, connman.net and meego.gitorious.org . So if you are eager to contribute or want to closely follow whats happening, please work on those.
As you know, we have delivered working MeeGo images for N900 as part of first code drop in the end of March. At that state we were using older kernel version on N900 than on Atom side, as we used the same kernel (.28) than what is used in Maemo 5 based products today. We ended up doing that simply because lack of time to contribute and port all the drivers to the newer kernels.
Now, for the upcoming May release of MeeGo, we are going to use the same kernel version (.33) than Atom based devices are using. For that we need to submit number of ARM-architecture patches to MeeGo as well, because many of the required ones have just been contibuted upstream kernel and were not available in .33 version originally.
We have already enabled most of the main drivers, like LCD, GFX, Wlan and BT. Still, there is a lot to do in order to enable .33 on N900, like audio drivers, and modem subsystem including SSI buss driver, modem data and audio drivers etc. Our adaptation guys are in fact contributing those modem subsystem related drivers as we speak, and if you are following kernel mailing lists you can see how that goes on.
Besides of enabling the new kernel, we are working with number of smaller and bigger issues for N900. Starting from the beginning, we are now based on ARMv7 combiled code, so the code should be better optimised for N900 now. ARMv5 compilation that was in use for code drop will still be there, and it also seems to be used at least by community project that is planning to release MeeGo for good old N810 tablets
Also, we are planning to enable dual booting of Maemo 5 and MeeGo for the upcoming release. So that will be offered as 3rd way to setup MeeGo to N900, including the existing "native" MeeGo only on N900 and chroot based MeeGo on Maemo 5 setups. Taking the dual boot mode into use likely includes upgrade to Maemo5 kernel as well, but that should not be big issue in the process of enabling that.
As I don't want to go ahead of others working on MeeGo architecture and other issues I will stop now, but I will report again when we have more to tell about the subject.
Br,
// Harri

Here's another update..
It seems that MeeGo on the N900 is not directly being driven by Nokia! It's an open project.. so the net result is MeeGo on the N900 may look and feel very different to Meego on the N900's sucessor
Either way, I'm certainly greatful for their efforts!
Hello Meego's,
As indicated in my previous mail about "MeeGo for N900" status, we were planning to open up our MeeGo work around N900. Now I am happy to announce, that we are there
First, to make it absolute clear for everybody: This is about open MeeGo adaptation to N900 device.
Like any other MeeGo project, it is open source project for all applicaple purposes, and does NOT directly have links to any potential Nokia product or potential product plans. So, based on this or any other of my posts, please do NOT start or continue speculation of upcoming Nokia MeeGo releases. That is practically not helpfull, and mostly only takes our time when we need to explain our words and actions in detail to various directions.
From our part, we are trying to implement the open development model that has been discussed now so many times around MeeGo. On practical terms, we are trying to work based on proposal by Carsten Munk, see
http://wiki.meego.com/Proposal_for_Best_Practices_for_working_in_a_MeeGo_team
We have already created some resources that will be used by the team, you can learn about those and the upcoming ones from http://wiki.meego.com/ARM/N900. We have IRC channel for realtime discussion, we will use meego-dev mailing list for normal discussions and announcements, and we will have Gitorius project for code.
We will evolve our practicies during the work, so if you are interested, stay tuned to those channels. I belive that soon we are also able to figure out, what is best way for community members to help us in development, and then effectively be part of the team.
I would also like to use this as opportunity to introduce the team behind this work (so far) and also thank them about their hard work and long hours. We have team that consist of some Nokia subcontractors and also growing team of Nokia personel:
"MeeGo for N900" team (so far)
- Cybercom Turku team; Marko Saukko, Jouni Peltonen, Sami Sirkiä, Jari Smura and Luka Milovanov.
- Cybercom Tampere team; Kalle Lampila,Teemu Tuominen,Tuukka Mäkinen and Ville Marjusaari.
- Carsten Munk via Nomovok
- Jarkko Nikula via Atomide
- Jan-Simon Möller from Linuxfoundation
- Nokia team; Alexander Kanevskiy, Felipe Contreras, Markus Lehtonen, Ameya Palande, Sakari Poussa, Roger Quadros and me.
In addition to official project team, many Nokia people have helped us despite their hectic daily work, even with their free time. Most of them are driven by the desire to open, repurpose and upstream all relevant sw that has been originally created for Maemo 5 based N900 product during previous years.
Marko, Jouni, Sami & Luka and Markus were working with me already on last year when we did prototypes and interoperability tests of Maemo & Moblin stuff combined in different ways. Based on those we had pretty good picture of what we are doing and why.
And of course, we have had very good and productive co-operation with various Intel teams since those times. Anas Nashif and many others from Intel's MeeGo team have done a lot for us by enabling ARM stuff in MeeGo OBS and repositories.
Last but not least, I want to give special thanks to Stskeeps (alias Carsten Munk . He has teached us how to operate on open, and he has also done respectable amount of this work since early days of Meego. In addition to that, I belive that his earlier work on Maemo community and on Mer project has in fact inspired all of us and shown a way to MeeGo alredy years ago.
Br,
//Harri

Unable to run bapis for project status update and date update together

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement to update the dates and status of a project WBS at level 4. I am trying to do update the CJ02 Transaction using standard BAPI available. I need to do both Date update and status update in the same LOOP PASS   i am using the below mention bapi. when i am doing so i am getting an error Project 'A._____' has been currently processed by ID i.e. my id.
I have tried putting a wait for 2 seconds in the code but its still not working. please find the order below in which i am calling the bapi.
Loop at itab.
if date_changed = 'X'.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PROJECT_MAINTAIN'
      READ TABLE it_error WITH KEY message_type = c_e.
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
Commit
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
             EXPORTING
                  wait   = c_x
             IMPORTING
                  return = s_ret.
   endif.
endif.
if Status_change = 'X'.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PS_INITIALIZATION' .
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BUS2054_SET_STATUS'
      READ TABLE t_result WITH KEY message_type = c_e.
      IF sy-subrc NE 0.
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PS_PRECOMMIT'
             TABLES
                  et_return = t_ret.
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
             EXPORTING
                  wait   = c_x
             IMPORTING
                  return = s_ret.
     ENDIF.
endif.
    WAIT UP TO 4 SECONDS.
endloop.

Try to use
SET UPDATE TASK LOCAL.
before each BAPI call.
Did you try to debug through your code, leaving sufficient time between BAPI calls? If it does work like that, then the above statement might help.

Delivery status update in sales document at PGI

Normally system updates the delivery status of sales document line level, when a delivery document is created with respect to that sales document line.
But I want system to update the delivery status (in sales doc. line) when PGI is done for respective delivery document; not at the creation of delivery document. Below I have shown the status updating scenarios that I expect.
Scenario 1
Sales doc line qty: 100 PCs
Delivery Doc qty: 50 PCs
PGI: Not done
Status in Sales document line should be A (Open)
Scenario 2
Sales doc line qty: 100 PCs
Delivery Doc qty: 50 PCs
PGI: 50 PCs
Status in Sales document line should be B (Partially delivered)
Scenario 3
Sales doc line qty: 100 PCs
Delivery Doc qty: 100 PCs
PGI: 100 PCs
Status in Sales document line should be C (Fully delivered)
Can anyone propose a possible way of doing this (configuration/ user exits/ BADI etc,)?
Thanks,
Ramindu

Hi,
I dont know it with the use of ABAP development, but by functional logic, can suggest you to configure the rush order sales configuration for your particular sales order.
just check that availability of that particualar sales order is met or not prior to it.
and then automatically when your delivery doc is created, PGI would be done and the status of your sales order would be updated with it.
try it out on your development client, if it works out.
regards,
Siddharth.

HT4314 hello i have an ipod touch 4 5.1.1 and i can't post status updates or have a profil picture what is the problem and my sister has it and we have the same itunes account in game center

hello i have an ipod touch 4 5.1.1 and i can't post status updates or have a profil picture what is the problem and my sister has it and we have the same itunes account in game center

And the answer is:
williamfromlongueuil wrote:
we have the same itunes account in game center
You need to have your own account... DUH....

Status Update of Service Order From Billing Document

Dear Experts,
I am told to change the User status of Service Order once the Billing Document is Generated.
Here we are in CRM 2007 and i have done the status update of previous document but here
Billing document is not possible to read through CRM_ORDER_READ (function module).
Do any one have any idea how do i proceed.
Thanks,
SA

hi sa
to change the service order user status , when biling document is generated
make an implementation of bill_acc_if bai and in the method ENRICH_ACC_DOCUMENT
read order data using crm_order_read and change the status using
CRM_STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN
thnks
sam

Can´t access my files on Creative Cloud. "Page temporarily unavailable. We will return soon." "We are working quickly to resolve the problem and apologize for the delay. Check back later or visit our website for status updates. In addition, you can get he

Hello,
For a few days I have been trying to access my files on Creative Cloud web without success. I´ve got this message only:
"Page temporarily unavailable. We will return soon."
"We are working quickly to resolve the problem and apologize for the delay.
Check back later or visit our website for status updates.
In addition, you can get help in the forums of the Creative Cloud.
Thank you for understanding!"
(I used Google Translate)
Somebody help?

You do not need ?&promoid=KRUVP at the end of the url but it should not matter.
One thing to check is if your hosts file is modified. Open the Command Prompt and type: notepad %systemroot%\system32\drivers\etc\hosts
This will open a read-only copy of your host file in Notepad. Are there any entries in this file regarding adobe.com?
The other thing you can do is open the Developer Tools in the Chrome browser. On Windows press Ctrl + Shift to open them. Switch to the Network tab. Reload the page by pressing Ctrl + r. Check for any 4xx or 5xx errors which should be colored red.
Post screenshots of your results or send me a private forum message with the information.

Report on "Status updates history"

Hi,
i need to check if resource are updating task from "My Task". Is it possible to estract a report on "Status updates history"?
I mean this type of data:
Approval Date
Action
Status
Info
Task Name
Project
Type
Start
Finish
Actual Work
Remaining Work
% Complete
Assigned To
Approved By
Thanks
Daniele

Hi Daniel,
You will probably have to create a join with the MSP_ASSIGNMENT_TRANSACTIONS Table.
See reference here:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/project_programmability/archive/2008/01/03/statusing-transactions-partial-documentation.aspx
Hope this helps.
Guillaume Rouyre - MBA, MCP, MCTS

BBM status update is extra sensitive....

I have been facing problem with BBM status update and display name screens.
They are extar sensitive and change immediately before you actually decide to press enter.
Any solutions?

Good day
Welcome to BB forums
I never seen or heard of something like that happening!
may I ask what OS your running now?
Want to contract me? You can follow me on Twitter @RobGambino
Be sure to click Like! for those who have helped you.
Click Accept as Solution for posts that have solved your issue(s)!

Ios 8 photos won't upload in safari to facebook status update

Installed iOS 8. I use Safari to access Facebook.com. photos will no longer upload to Facebook status update.

Stan, did they infer it only 'may' get fixed?
Surely they Have to fix this very Major issue or they'll go bust!
I'd never trust them again.
Do you have the email address of Apple?
Or know if they've made any public statements concerning this problem.
the other issues, like caps coming on and off or slower speeds I can live with but not being able to upload images is a major problem. If not fixed it would render my iPad virtually useless to me.

Status updates

How would i be able to delete my status updates on skype so that my parents wont see them when they have me log into my skype account?

Ok, I understand.
Open your BBM app.
Swipe down from the top edge to Settings.
Scroll down towards the bottom and tap on Blocked Contacts and Updates.
Tap the Updates tab at the top.
On the contact whose updates you have hidden, tap and hold on that contact, and tap the trash can icon (to remove the hidden status, this will not delete the contact)
This will remove the contact from the Hide Status updates.
1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Status updates history period default

Hi
Is there any way to change the default status updates history date range from 3 months please? Currently as the status approver for a major change program I'm getting several hundred tasks to approve every day across multiple project plans; the problem
is that when I go in to clear down to run my weekly reports it lists every task submission for the last 3 months. The thing is, IE can take several minutes before it displays the page in full as it chews through all of the data which is annoying
to say the least.
I'd quite like it to show only the last 3 weeks, not the last 3 months.
Does anyone have any suggestions please?
Thanks.

Hi,
As far as I tested, changing the default 3 months range from the date range feature will unfortunaltely not be kept in your IE cache next time you'll navigate to the status update history page. Thus you'll have to set it again every time you access
the page.
I guess this 3 months default value might be changed programmabily but I can't help on this.
Hope this helps,
Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MCP, MCTS |

UWL status shows as pending thoguh the form is approved .

UWL status shows as pending thoguh the form is approved .
How is can happen .
How do i know which component in webdynpro it is calling for the status .
Please advice me to analysis the situation from my side also .

Hi Raj,
Well from my past experience I would say it was just a coincidence when approval and release happened in close vicinity of time. Check the time of the event occurrence in the log and also the time of approval. If they are very close then it might be the case that as soon as the approval happened someone released the PO directly from the transaction. Who did ? check the log for that. Event creator.
Now the thing is are you able to replicate this error again? or it was just one isolated incident.
Hope this helps!
regards,
Anuj Sethi

OnPlus not providing new Contract/Warranty status updates

The Cisco Contract/Warranty notification function in OnPlus is currently not providing new updates.
The Product Contract/Warranty function of OnPlus displays product up-to-date information regarding the Contract status and Warranty for supported Cisco devices. This function is currently not providing new updates to those devices in OnPlus and the OnPlus engineering team is working on a resolution to the problem.
Status updates for other product lifecycle information about Cisco devices, such as, Software and Hardware End-of-Life, Product Security Alerts, and Field Notices are available in OnPlus.
As additional information is known for the time to resolution, we will post more details.
Thanks,
The OnPlus team

We have resolved this issue and OnPlus is now providing complete lifecycle information for new devices scanned or discovered through ON100.
We applogize for any inconvenience.
Thank you,
OnPlus Team

UWL Status Update

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for