UWL sub rule problem with BPEMUWLConnector

Hi,
We had a issue now with 1 user, he can create sub and the nominee can see it. But when other person create a rule and assign this person as nominee, he cannot see it.
Any idea what's the problem? We are currently using CE 7.2. THe BPEMUWLConnector in local.
Many thanks

Hi,
The template you used is different.
Try to create a java webdynpro iview and in the package you will find substitution application variant.
After creating the iview open the preview and here you can use CTRL plus right click and personalize.
Thanks and Regards,
gopal

Similar Messages

UWL Substitution rules : Problems reported (repairable)

Hello,
I have a poblem with the substitution rules within the EP7.0 (our backend system is ECC6.0).
I have created a substitution rule and have set it active.
When I have a look later on to the management of substitution rules, i always get an error message: "Problems reported (repairable)" --> "Substitution rule is not defined in the system" (System: SAP_ECC_UWL --> this is our system alias for uwl in the EP). When I push "retry" the substitution rule is succesfully registered again.
But the next time when I have a look onto it, i get the same error message.
I checked out the substitution rule, it worked (that means the substitute see the work items in his uwl), but why there is this strange error message ???
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Stefan

Hi all,
I got a similar error:
- Whenever I create a substitution rule, activate it and press then "Refresh", I get two substition rules (for two different users).
This is highly strange. Does anyone have any hints how to avoid to get these two rules?
Best Regards
Philipp Kölsch

Business Rule - Problem with Validation Execution

I'm running into an issue where conditional Validation Execution is not working as expected. The background is that i have an Entity Object containing a few string attributes on which i must apply Regular Expression business rules to make sure only characters in a certain range is set. I am using a Not Matches regex on the following:
.*[^\u0020-\uD7FF].*1 attribute is required, 2 are optional. The problem I am experiencing is with the 2 optional attributes.
Since these are optional, I intended to use the Validation Execution tab so that the Rule is executed only when the attribute is not null. For example, here is what i tried for an attribute named Comments:
Comments != nullNo validation occurred when I entered an invalid value, such as a string containing line breaks, in a corresponding ADF Faces page. For the heck of it, i experimented by setting the validation execution to the opposite of what i should be - in other words, trigger validation if the attribute is null, such as:
Comments == nullWith this, the validation occurred as expected.
Is this a bug, or am I misunderstanding something? I'm not particularly good with RegEx - is it possible this is due to some nuance of the expression?
Version: JDeveloper 11.1.1.6.
Thanks-
-george

i'm not sure if this is the correct answer or a workaround to the issue i had asked about. Given that caveat, if anyone else ever runs across this thread, what i found worked was to not use the attribute name in the Validation Execution tab's expression, but instead to just newValue as in the following:
newValue != null

Rules Problem with multiple XSD

Hi,
I've done a jdev project for SOA Suite 11g including only one Business Rules which could be call by a Webservice.
When I used 2 differents XSD to define 1 input fact and 1 output fact, the rule engine failed with an UNEXPECTED element Error
<fault>
<faultType>0</faultType>
<operationErroredFault>
<part name="payload">
<errorInfo>
<errorMessage>unexpected element (uri:"http://www.arvato.fr/formatPivot", local:"CUSTOMER"). Expected elements are <{http://www.arvato.fr/formatPivot}ADDRESS>,<{http://www.arvato.fr/formatPivot}DedoublonnageRule>,<{http://www.arvato.fr/formatPivot}StatusRule></errorMessage>
</errorInfo>
</part>
</operationErroredFault>
</fault>
When I use only one XSD file in my facts fou my input and outpout values. It runs Well.
Here are the facts definition with Multiple XSD FIle :
http://lh5.ggpht.com/_noQvj60LDl4/S4-J8DcFEkI/AAAAAAAAAKU/fAtlSMgFS_8/separatedSchemas.png
Here are the facts definition with Single XSD FIle :
http://lh6.ggpht.com/_noQvj60LDl4/S4-J78qnj0I/AAAAAAAAAKQ/U1JNnaJyK50/includedSchema.png
Could you please answer me how to use multiple xsd file in facts ?
Regards,
Jerome.

Hi,
Does anybody have any idea ?
Regards,
Jerome

Business rule problem with association

Hi,
i am facing an issue with business rules am not able to associate with planning outline in AAS console
Ram

Hi Ram,
Navigate to
1. C:\Hyperion\AnalyticAdministrationServices\storage\easusers\users.xml
2. Edit users.xml file
3. Update admin to "true" and save file.
4. For example,
EASUsers><EASUser directory="admin" email="[[email protected]]" external="true" fullName="EAS Administrator" id="1" isMigrated="false" password="A627FC9A6DEA834C1FA7772..........." roles="roles" supervisor="true" username="admin"/>
This should help you
5. After this, you restart RMI, AAS and planning services.
6. Now, it should work
Sandeep Reddy Enti
HCC
http://hyperionconsultancy.com/

Sub account problems with outlook express

I have a slight problem in that I use outlook express as my email software and have no problems receiving my emails but I have a sub account for my partner and I cannot receive her emails so if anybody can help I would be very greatfull.
I have only had this problem since I set up outlook on my new laptop and can still receive her emails on my old desktop but as I do not use it very often it is a pain to fire it up just to receive her emails.

ihateipswich wrote:
I have a slight problem in that I use outlook express as my email software and have no problems receiving my emails but I have a sub account for my partner and I cannot receive her emails so if anybody can help I would be very greatfull.
I have only had this problem since I set up outlook on my new laptop and can still receive her emails on my old desktop but as I do not use it very often it is a pain to fire it up just to receive her emails.
Hi. Welcome to the forums.
Do you receive any error messages when trying to receive the emails ?
If I may be frank, the fact that you can receive the emails on the old machine, and not the new one indicates a settings problem in the new machine (though other things can interfere).
Make sure that you have spelt the email address correctly, it is surprisingly easy to get a character wrong. Also make sure that you have got the correct server address mail.btinternet.com, and that you have the correct port number 25 - and not using any SSL (that is usually a tick box).
Please don't post any personal details on a reply (e.g. remove email address from any error message posted).
http://www.andyweb.co.uk/shortcuts
http://www.andyweb.co.uk/pictures

Can I debug a rules problem with logs?

All of a sudden my mail rules have gone crazy. Is there a log kept somewhere that I could see what rule is affecting which messages?

Here's information about logs:
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=2004101603285984
You should be able to use Console to locate the Mail log file.

Design Problem with GUI sub vi

Hello community,
in general, I would like to separate the GUI from the data, but I get
a problem with this design approach in LabView:
I often have sub VIs that are supposed to control something.
Therefore, these VIs consist of a control loop. A GUI window should
show the regulation process (showing how the tracking error is
hopefully approaching zero etc.). As I said, this GUI should be a
separate VI (separate from the control loop VI). Since the GUI has to
be updated on each sample, it is clear that the GUI VI should be
inside the control loop, and therefore, it should be a sub VI of the
control loop VI.
Now, the problem is that the control loop VI itsself is a sub VI
because the whole regulation is just a subsystem of the whole program
(The main VI doesn't have a GUI, but first starts a (GUI) input mask
for the same reason: separate the GUI from the rest).
But back to the GUI VI inside the control loop. I must check the 'Show
Front Panel When Called' option. But I can't check the 'Close
Afterwards if Originally Closed' option since the GUI VI would appear
and disappear in the control loop - according to the loop's sample
rate. However, if I don't check the 'Close Afterwards if Originally
Closed' option then the GUI VI will continue to show, even after the
control process is finished.
So in other words: I need the possiblity to close the GUI VI
programatically, after the control process is finished.
Any ideas?
Regards
Johannes

Hi tmh,
thanks for your answer
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 10:26:32 -0600 (CST), tmh wrote:
>I think you're on the wrong track trying to put your 'GUI VI' inside
>your control loop. It might be a better design to have the control and
>GUI handled by separate loops and use an appropriate method to pass
>data between the two, e.g. a global variable to pass the setpoint from
>GUI to control...
I try to avoid globals. Now, suppose I had multiple unrelated control
loops. I had to suppose a global variable for each of these
subsystems. I already use globals for the GPIB device IDs. I wouldn't
like more.
>and a queue to pass readings from control to GUI. In
>fact, you could even split the GUI into two loops: one to read user
>input from the front pa
nel controls and one to display data returned
>by the control loop.
But if I split the GUI: How can I view them simultaneously? The user
must see input and output simultaneously, in one window.
>You may find it's more convenient to make the GUI
>the top-level VI and make the control loop a subVI of that (but
>outside the GUI loops).
Your approach sounds interesting. Is there a sample for this
architecture in the examples?
Anyway, I have to point out that I have several unrelated GUI windows
in my application. There is no notion of a main GUI in my application.
The control loop is just one feature of my application, so it doesn't
make sense to use the control GUI as the top-level VI. At application
startup a user input form is displayed (it also has some sort of menu
selection). But even this window can't be toplevel since it provides
an Option radio button (that shows and hides controls, accordingly) a
CONTINUE button, and a STOP button which implies that the input
form.vi must be
in a loop.
The problem is that I can't send messages to windows in LabView as I
am used to in Win32/VC++.
Johannes

Problem with rules in mail.app

I've just started having a problem with my rules in mail.app that I just don't understand. I have several rules that I've had working for quite a while now, over a year. All of a sudden beginning about a month ago, some of them -- different ones at different times -- stop working and the incoming mail goes into my main mail box and don't get distributed according to the rules to the appropriate mail boxes.
When I check the rules, all of which are basically the same: If any of the following conditions are met, From contains XXX, Perform the following actions: Move message to mailbox xxx, I see that mailbox XXX has changed from what it should be to some other mailbox name which is a valid name but not the one that I originally put in the rule.
To make it a bit more strange, the rule with the wrong mailbox name is not executed and the mail winds up in my main mailbox.
When I edit the rule and change the mailbox name and am asked whether I want to apply the rule and I respond yes, the rule executed and the mail that landed in the main mailbox gets distributed the way it should.
But then anywhere from a day to a week later the same thing happens, that is, the mailbox name in the rule somehow gets changed again.
Has anyone seen this behavior before and/or have any suggestions for fixing it?

Are you really on 10.8.1 as per your profile - maybe updating to 10.8.3 might help.
Have you tried rebuilding the mailbox? It sometimes helps sort out Mail problems:
http://support.apple.com/kb/PH11811

Problem with two of my business rule triggers

Good morning every one,
I have a small problem with two of my business rule triggers.
I have these tables:
pms_activity
csh_cash
csh_integrate_leh
csh_integrate_led
and my process goes like this:
upon approval of a row in my pms_activity table I have a trigger that insert a row in my csh_cash - and in the csh_cash table I have a trigger that will insert in the csh_ingerate_leh and csh_integrate_led.
my problem is pms_activity does generate a row in csh_cash but the trigger in the cash does not fire to generate a row in the csh_integrate_leh and led tables.
I have generated in the following order after I created my business rule:
I have generated the table from the designer (server module tab)
I have generated the CAPI from the head start utility
I have generated the API from the designer
I have generated the CAPI from the designer
I have run the recompil.sql
I have checked that my business rule trigger is enabled and should run on insert and no where restriction
=== this is my business rule logic ======
l_rule_ok boolean := true;
begin
trace('br_csh001_cev (f)');
csh_gl_pkg.csh_gen_integ_jvs(p_id
,p_ref_num
,p_own_id
,p_trt_id
,p_value_date
,p_description
,p_amount
,p_cur_id
,p_gla_dr
,p_gla_cr
,p_gla_pl
,p_gla_rev
,p_gla_eqt);
return l_rule_ok;
exception
when others
then
qms$errors.unhandled_exception(PACKAGE_NAME||'.br_csh001_cev (f)');
end br_csh001_cev;
==== end =======================
Any help will be appreciated as I have struggled with this for two days.
Thanks

hmmm...
Try resetting it again and restoring with the same backup file...
Does the phone work properly once you've reset it before you try restoring? A lot of people here have experienced problems restoring from backups... could be worth forgetting about it and starting from scratch.
You could try contacting your nearest Nokia Service Centre (www.nokia.com/repair) and see if they can do anything - it may need the firmware reinstalling or upgrading... possibly... give them a call though and see.
Nokia History: 3110, 5110, 7110, 7110, 3510i, 6210, 6310i, 5210, 6100, 6610, 7250, 7250i, 6650, 6230, 6230i, 6260, N70, N70, 5300, N95, N95, E71, E72
Android History: HTC Desire, SE Xperia Arc, HTC Sensation, Sensation XE, One X+, Google Nexus 5

Problem with business rule

Hi all,
I have a problem with a business rule (BR) deployed as a standalone Descision service.
the BR consists on a simple decision table wich compare an input (bigInteger) with 50. It returns two facts (as output).
the two conditions are confugured (i.e. <50 and >=50).
the Decision service (stateless) is called in a simple BPEL process. in some cases the the assign activity in the bpel process rise this exception :
<bpelFault><faultType>0</faultType><selectionFailure xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/03/business-process/"><part name="summary"><summary>empty variable/expression result. The XPath variable or expression /ns5:callFunctionStatelessDecision/ns5:resultList/ns6:processResponse/ns6:CodeRetour is empty at line 440. An attempt to read or copy data referenced or computed by the XPath expression either had invalid data, according to the XML schema, or did not contain certain optional data. Ensure that the variable or expression result named in the error message is not empty. Enable XML schema validation of related variables to ensure the run-time data is valid. </summary></part></selectionFailure></bpelFault>
it seems like an output of the business rule used by the assign after the invoke activity is empty.
But in the input payload for the decision service all elements are not empty. I can't inderstand how the OBR return an empty variable?
Any help please?

In the taskflow you should be capable to trace step by step what happens in the execution. Does this give any clue, e.g. why sometimes the assert does not work?
cu
Andreas

Problem with Business object attributes in UWL Workitem description

Hi All,
I have developed a workflow which sends the workitem for two level approvals. Once the workflow is triggered workitem sent to the respective user for approval. When user opens the workitem in inbox he can see all the data which comes from the 'Z' Business object in R/3 and he can approve the same. Everything works fine when this process happens in R/3 system.
The problem comes when user opens this workitem in UWL or this workitem is sent to user mail ID executing 'SWN_SELSEN' report, all the attributes of the business object are displayed in the workitem description except 2 . These are the Minimum annual salary(GRMIN) and Maximum annual salary(GRMAX) fields from 'T510N' table.
Regards,
Vaishali.
Edited by: vaishali rautray on Dec 24, 2008 7:52 AM

Hi Saumya,
Thanks for the quick reply.
For storing the Minimum and maximum annual salary values I have created two attributes in the business object which are referring to database fields. T510N is a customizing table. I could see the values for the same, if I test the Business Object or Trigger the w/f in R/3 and check the approval work item in R/3. These values disappears only in case of web interfacing i.e. If I send the same work item to outlook mail or check it in UWL.
I had checked the same and thought if there is any problem with BO or some other processing takes place before these values are retrieved. But I wonder why this happens only if I process the work item outside R/3 system?
Regards,
Vaishali.

Problem with Business Rules in OBPM 10.3.1 Enterprise for WebLogic

We're having a problem with our Business Rules. We've updated two of our business rules (that are used by business rule transitions) in Studio; however, when we publish the updated process, the business rules are not updated. We cannot find anywhere in the Process Admin where to administer the rules to make sure they're overwritten.
I've double checked, and the updated rule code is in the .project.xpdl, but for whatever reason, the rules are not being updated during the deployment. I'm sure that we've done this many times in the past, but for some reason, now it is not working.
We're tried variations of the different versioning when we publish, and we've also tried to unpublish all of the older versions of our process, but it does not change the business rules. We can try to unpublish and undeploy, but it seems like we would lose all old instances of that process that are still running if we did that.
Has anyone ever had this issue, or know if there is a way to effect the business rules via the process admin?

I see what you're saying, but here's why it works the way you're observing it.
Once deployed, the 10g business rules are edited by a business user (the owner of the rule). Changes in Studio that a developer makes to a business rule don't override the changes that the business user made.
To let the business owner edit the rule, add a Global Interactive activity and change its property setting to edit the business rule. Put this activity in the role for the business owner (the person you want to edit the rule).
Dan

Problem with printing the sub totals

Hi,
I am having a problem with smart forms in printing the line items of invoice.
I need to print the sub total of each page and need to display the sub total in the footer, with the caption 'Balance C f/w'. It works fine in some cases.
In some cases, the sub total is getting printed wrongly, because its adding the amount of the next page's first line item also. I checked the form page by printing SFSY-PAGE along with the line item's text. It's observed that, the vlaue of SFSY-PAGE for the first line item's displayed in the second page is '1'. Due to this, the amount for this line item also is getting calculated with the sub total of the previous page.
Could you please suggest a solution for this problem?
Thanks & Regards,
John

Hi,
In smartforms, in the general attributes of the FIRST page the Mode for the page counter should be 'Initialize counter' and for the NEXT page it should be 'Increase counter'.
Please check this in your smartform.
Regards,
Ram

Problem with sub-screen actions on Cancel button

Hi all,
I have a problem with sub-screen.
I created a subscreen (screen sequence in MM01/MM02/MM03). When users leave this screen, I call POPUP_TO_CONFIRM to ask if they want to save the data.
1) My goal is: when they choose Cancel, no actions are performed and users will see the current screen. However, I cannot use command: SET SCREEN 0 or LEAVE TO SCREEN 0 because the system gives an error message:
*SET SCREEN not allowed in subscreens*.
2) How can we determine when the user leaves the screen? which value of SY-UCOMM will be used to check this?
Thanks in advance.

for dis SET SCREEN is not required.
Consider d code given below as n eg:
CALL FUNCTION 'POPUP_TO_CONFIRM'
    EXPORTING
      titlebar              = 'SAVE'
      text_question         = 'SOME _QUS'
      text_button_1         = 'YES'
      text_button_2         = 'NO'
      default_button        = '2'
      display_cancel_button = ' '
    IMPORTING
      answer                = l_ans
    EXCEPTIONS
      text_not_found        = 1
      OTHERS                = 2.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    MESSAGE e066.
ENDIF.
IF l_ans EQ '1'.    " when yes is pressed
   MODIFY db.
   commit work.
   leave program.
ELSEIF l_ans EQ '2'. "when no is pressed
    leave program.
ELSE.     " when cancel is pressed
ENDIF.
In above module when Yes is pressed it saves data den leave prog.
As no action is specified for cancel button it will remain on that screen only from which popup is called, in this way ur problem can be solved.
Reward properly.

UWL sub rule problem with BPEMUWLConnector

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for