V_V2 not considering GR time in STO in GR end time

Dear colleagues,
I found an issue during V_V2 rescheduling where GR time in material master seems not to be considered.
Please see the following example:
After creating an STO and running ATP on it manually, I receive the following schedule lines result.
Executing V_V2 for this material only and STO documents I see how the GR end date has changed and no longer considers the GR time of 4 days.
Does somebody know if there is a note that solves this situation already?
Thansk for your time in advance!
Salvador

Dear Prasson Ak,
Thanks for your answer, Unfortunately I had already checked this note without success.
The reason being that the modification that it proposes is only relevant in the following form:
FORM PURDOC_PREPARE_MEKET
This form is entered based on the following condition
IF t_eket_new[] IS INITIAL.
in my scenario, t_eket_new is always filled in so this form is always skipped.
Any other ideas?
Thanks again!
Salvador

Similar Messages

MRP not considering STO as demand

Hi,
When I run MRP, it is not considering the Storage location STO (SLOC to SLOC) as the demand.
here is the scenario in detial.
Material 1, MRP1 : MRP type V1 Reorder point 10, MRP 4 MRP indicator, SP proc key 20, Reorder point 50, Repl qty 25
STO created for 30. MRP run. ORD DS as -30 and available qty as 20. At this stage I expected a Pur req because the stock fell below reorder point
Material 2, MRP1 : MRP type PD Reorder point 0, MRP 4 MRP indicator, SP proc key 20, Reorder point 50, Repl qty 25
Same thing observed in this case also.
Bottom line STO (SLOC to SLOC) it is not considering as demand.
Please let me know the options that I have and what i am missing.
Thanks
Srini

The problem is solved.
I have made a change to the MRP type.
In the config, Under Additional requirements in Reorder point Planning, I have selected all the check boxes. For the current requirement, Order Reservation and Release Ord stock transfer are sufficient.
After transporting the values, It worked as expected. It considered, STO as well as reservations as demand.
PS: Initially it did not work after the transport. I went into the Material in the change mode and touched and saved it. It is working fine
Thanks
Srini

System is not considering Planned Delivery time

Dear Gurus,
As iam planning for the month of January and running the MRP,schedulelines are getting generated but system is not condering Planned Delivery time maintained in the material master ie. 7days.Following is the example:
I have a FERT-X with a component A-1PC in its BOM and its planned delvery time from vendor is 7 Days.If iam running the MRP on 13/12/2010 for FERT-X 100 PCS for January1,2011 then the schedule lines are getting generated for for component A is on 01/01/2011.But PDT is maintianed in material master is 7 days and same has been maintianed in vendor inforecord.But system is not considering it.
Kindly help to resolve the issue.
With Regards.

I have one ROH which has two different vendors.
Two scheduling Agreemnt with target qty 100000 kg each.
Two different Vendor info record with Min. order qty maintained.V1-1000Kg,V2-6000Kg.
One source list with two vendors and with respective scheduling agreement.
Quota arrangement is there in which SOB is maintiained 50:50.
I hv the requirement of 3084 kg of ROH.
I run the MRP and two diiferent schedule lines are getting generated with 50:50 qty as mentioned in Quota arrangement.
Not considering the minimum order qty maintiained in vendor info record.
The above process is correct
Only One doubt In Quota Arrangement?
IS two schedule line is created after MRP run?
Generally System will select a vendor Whose Quota value is less
quota rating = quota base quantity + quota-allocated quantity/ quota
Edited by: Sundaresan . E. V on Dec 14, 2010 3:26 PM

Scheduling agreement qty requirement is not considered in V_V2

Hi Friends,
We are facing a problem in rescheduling transaction V_V2. System is not considering the requirement of the confirmed schedule lines of the scheduling agreement while carrying out the ATP in V_V2 and the available qty is allocated to the sales orders.
Ex: Available Stock : 1000 EA
1. SA confirmed Qty: 1000
2. Sales order created for the qty of 1000, system is considering the SA requirement and confirming the SO based on RLT.
3. When we run ATP in sales order change, system is still considering the SA requirement and not changing the confirmed date.
4. But when we run the V_V2, system is ignoring the SA and confirming the SO line item with PULL-IN.
Because of this SO is stealing the stock reserved for the SA. Is there a way to change the behavior of V_V2 similar to VA02, which considers the SA requirement / confirmed qty while rescheduling.
Thanks,
Ram

Hi Ram,
Rescheduling of sales documents is item specific. It is not possible to reschedule individual schedule lines of scheduling
agreements. Each schedule line is displayed but only the open quantity can be rescheduled.
You can find further information in SDV03V02 documentation.
The open qty on item level will be checked becasue rescheduling of sales documents (scheduling agreements) is item specific.
Availability Check in Rescheduling is always on item-level.
Thanks and best regards,
Smile

Is there a possibility should not consider available quantity at time of MR

Sir,
Is there a possibility should not consider available quantity at time of MRP planning?
Example:
Available stock: 100
Planning stock: 100 (MD61)
Schedule line to be generate: 100 Qty (Exclude the available quantity at time of MRP planning)
regards,
sampath

Dear Sampath/Raj,
1) Move the stock to particular storage location for which you don't want to be consider by MRP
2) Now go to OMIR t-code, input value as 1 for that particular storage location
3) Go to MMSC, input value as 1 for that particular storage location
4) Go to MRP - 4 view Down you can find field Storage location input value as 1
5) Now run MRP, system will not consider stock of that particular storage location
Regards
Madhu

Leading Zeros of Consumption in historical time series are not considered

We are using VM MRP Type and weighted average model to calculate forecast value using historical consumption values. I have 36 historical periods(months) but have consumption incurred only in last period i-e "1". I have choosen a weighted group 01 (20% for 1-12 month, 30% for 13-24 month, 50% for 25-36 month). Using these setting it should calculate the basic value as 1*0.5/12 = .042 but it gives "1" as basic value not considering leading zero consumption value in historical time series. If i put a value in first period it calculates correctly and considers the leading zero.
We have implemented note 1113276, 1145764 & 1113277 and have chosen CV_OPTION="X" in the interface as per theses notes instructions but still while executing the forecast it is not considering the leading zeros.
We are using ECC 6.0 MM with 602 support pack.
Need urgent help in this regard.

Have you followed the steps as per SAP Note 1113276 , Just check below link with same subject discussed check it helps you,
[Forecast with consumption zero are not considered |Forecast with consumption zero are not considered]

In-house production time not considered in scheduling

i have a material, with an in-house production time of 7. requirements date is today, May 23. as a sap standard, using backward scheduling, it shall see that the start day lies in the past, and should switch to forward scheduling, with May 23 as the start date, and may 30 as the finish date. however, the system only proposes a finish date of may 27. why is the system behaving this way?

Hi,
Please let us explain, where u have carried out scheduling ie during the MRP or in Production order.
I hope ur asking about Production order scheduling , inthat case system will not consider the Inhouse production time. Because lead time scheduling is carried in production order.
Scheduling will be done for routing times not for In-house production time.
Pradeep

Lead time from catalog does not consider factory calender

Hi,
we are working with SRM 2.0 classic scenario. I have following problem:
We take over lead time from a supplier catalog via OCI in EBP. This works but the lead time does not consider holidays and weekends. How can I activate the Factory Calender?
Thanks Thomas

Hello,
I just sniff arround and found out that EBP 3.0 does not support factory calendar.
You should use BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI or BADI BBP_CATALOG_TRANSFER and call within this BADI the function modules requesting the factory calendar data via RFC on the backend.
i.e.
get the target system of the follow-on document
    SELECT log_sys from BBP_DET_LOGSYS INTO wa_logsys-log_sys
    WHERE CATEGORY = ls_item-category.
    ENDSELECT.
read table T001WK
    CALL FUNCTION 'META_READ_TABLE'
      EXPORTING
        query_table    = 'T001W'
        logical_system = wa_logsys-log_sys
      TABLES
        options        = options
        fields         = fields
        data           = tabcont
      EXCEPTIONS
        OTHERS         = 1.
fill the internal table xt001w
    LOOP AT tabcont INTO la_tabcont.
      MOVE la_tabcont-content+3(4) TO la_xt001w-werks.
      MOVE la_tabcont-content+61(2) TO la_xt001w-fabkl.
      APPEND la_xt001w TO xt001w.
    ENDLOOP.
    SORT xt001w BY werks.
get the fabric calendar related to the plant
    READ TABLE xt001w INTO ma_XT001W
    with KEY werks = ls_item-BE_PLANT.
check if delivery date is a working day
    CALL FUNCTION 'DATE_CONVERT_TO_FACTORYDATE'
      DESTINATION wa_logsys-log_sys
      EXPORTING
        DATE                 = ls_item-DELIV_DATE
        FACTORY_CALENDAR_ID = ma_XT001W-fabkl
      IMPORTING
        WORKINGDAY_INDICATOR = W_IND.
get an error message if delivery date is not a working date
    IF W_IND = '+'.
CLEAR ls_message.
ls_message-msgty   = 'E'.
      ls_message-msgid   = 'ZBBP'.
      ls_message-msgno   = 'xxx'.
      ls_message-msgv1   = 'error message text, e.g. delivery date not
working date'.
      ls_message-item_guid = ls_item-guid. "assign message to item
      APPEND ls_message TO et_messages.
ENDIF.
endloop.

Trans duration not consider during Preq forward scheduling

Sales order is created with Make-to-order configurable material
Variant. During the planning process, the raw material is issued from
one facility to the facility specified on the sales order using STO
process.
During CTP process (backward & reverse strategy setting,), while doing
the backward scheduling, system considers the transport duration from
the transportation lane and calculates the correct requested date for
the raw material.
If there is no capacity available to make the raw material on the
requested date system is expected to carry out forward scheduling. The
system then updates the planned order that consumes raw material correctly.
While updating the Preq the system does not consider the transport
duration from the transportation lane. The availability date on PurRqs
and the requested date on the PReqRel is same.
Has anybody seen this issue?
Kedar

Guys,
We found that the transportation time is considered in forward scheduling of a PReq when we have a transportation resource. But it is not considered when we have GR/GI time in product master or in Tlane(only the GR).
Has anybody gone through this issue?
Kedar

Open items not considering in credit check.

Dear Experts,
We have implemented credit management in our new role out company code with the same credit controlling area for both company codes.
As per our configuration at the time of sales order creation, credit limit has to be checked and check the open items and oldest open items. It is working fine in old company code, but in new company code its not considering the open/old open items its only checking the credit exposure value. But the old company code its checking the credit exposure and open items and old open items.
In OVA8 we have configured the below way
selected the Dynamic check box - reaction C
selected the Cretical fields check box - reaction A
selected the Open items check box - reaction A
selected the OldestOpen items check box - reaction A
The above credit management is working fine in quality for both company codes, but in production its working fine only old company code.
I have already checked the all relevant configuration and requests, there is no issue in configuration.
Please let me know the possibilities for not considering the open items for credit check

Hello
You are absolutely right , the automatic credit control is at credit control Area level and not at company code level. Need to know few things from your end.
why business has not set up the new credit control area, when new company code has been configured. I think this would have made more sense .........
however its bit strange that sales recevables are not getting considered in the credit check, only in production ....... I think you need to keep your search on in SDN as well as try to search for any sap not in Service market .......
Once you get the answer; hope you update the thread ........
wish you luck in your search ......
Cheers
Big Screams ...........

I have a macbook air and need additional storage should i consider a time capsule or a simple external hard drive?

I have a macbook air and need additional storage should i consider a time capsule or a simple external hard drive?

If you move live files (files you don't want to lose) to an external drive, you need to back them up. Any files not backed up are at risk of loss. Hard drives and SSDs can fail at any time. It is hard to backup a Time Capsule so a TC should be used only as a backup device.
Do you have a Time Machine backup now? If so, and if it is large enough, you can backup your internal and external disk to it using Time Machine. If not, you all need to purchase an external drive or TC as your backup device. (I recommend an external hard drive for backup instead of a TC.) Ideally the backup drive should be twice the size of what you are backing up but 50% larger will work so if you have an external 1 TB disk and an internal 250 GB SSD then a 2 TB backup disk will work well.
By default, Time Machine will not backup the external disk. You need to remove it from the exclusions list:
To have Time Machine backup your system disk and your external offload disk up onto your Time Machine disk:
 > System Preferences > Time Machine > Options… > Remove the offload HD name from the exclusions list.

Query not considering function based index in oracle 11g

I have a query which used Function Based Index when run in oracle 9i but when I run the same query
without any changes, it does not consider index. Below is the query:
SELECT distinct patient_role.domain_key, patient_role.patient_role_key,
patient_role.emergency_contact_name,
patient_role.emergency_contact_phone, patient_role.emergency_contact_note,
patient_role.emergency_contact_relation_id,
patient_role.financial_class_desc_id, no_known_allergies, patient_role.CREATED_BY,
patient_role.CREATED_TIMESTAMP,
patient_role.CREATED_TIMESTAMP_TZ, patient_role.UPDATED_BY, patient_role.UPDATED_TIMESTAMP,
patient_role.UPDATED_TIMESTAMP_TZ,
patient_role.discontinued_date
FROM encounter, patient_role
WHERE patient_role.patient_role_key = encounter.patient_role_key
AND UPPER(TRIM(leading :SYS_B_0 from encounter.account_number)) = UPPER(TRIM(leading :SYS_B_1 from
:SYS_B_2))
AND patient_role.discontinued_date IS null
AND encounter.discontinued_date IS null ;
Index definition:
CREATE INDEX "user1"."IX_TRIM_ACCOUNT_NUMBER" ON "user1."ENCOUNTER" (UPPER(TRIM(LEADING
'0' FROM "ACCOUNT_NUMBER")), "PATIENT_ROLE_KEY", "DOMAIN_KEY", "DISCONTINUED_DATE")
PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS
STORAGE(INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1
BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT)
TABLESPACE "user1"
Database : Oracle 11g (11.2.0.3)
O/S : Linux 64 bit (the query does not consider index even on windows os)
Any suggestions?
-Onkar
Edited by: onkar.nath on Jul 2, 2012 3:32 PM

Onkar,
I don't appreciate you posting this question in several forums at the same time.
If I would know you also posted this on Asktom, I wouldn't even have bothered.
As to your 'issue':
First of all: somehow cursor_sharing MUST have been set to FORCE. Oracle is a predictable system, not a fruitmachine.
Your statement the '0' is replaced by a bind variable anyway is simply false. If you really believe it is not false, SUBMIT a SR.
But your real issue is not Oracle: it is your 'application', which is a mess anyway. Allowing for alphanumeric numbers is a really bad idea.
Right now you are already putting workaround on workaround on workaround on workaround.
Issue is the application: it is terminal., and you either need to kill it, or to replace it.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

SERVER IS NOT RESPONDING or IS NOT CONSIDERED SUITABLE. ......................... DC2 failed test Advertising Starting test: FrsEvent

Hi All,
I have the environment like DC1- 2k3 Service Pack 2 which is holding FSMO roles and now I build a new ADC DC2 – 2k8 R2 OS on different location (Subnet) . After completing ADC I run the DCDAIG on DC2 where I am getting below error
Not: I tried the configuration D4 and D2 for Burflag but no luck
Note: DC1 and DC2 both are on different location with different subnet.
Any suggestion or solution please
Doing primary tests
   Testing server: indai\DC2
      Starting test: Advertising
         Warning: DsGetDcName returned information for
         \\DC1.test.com, when we were trying to reach
         DC2.
         SERVER IS NOT RESPONDING or IS NOT CONSIDERED SUITABLE.
         ......................... DC2 failed test Advertising
      Starting test: FrsEvent
         There are warning or error events within the last 24 hours after the
         SYSVOL has been shared.
Failing SYSVOL replication problems may cause
         Group Policy problems.
Starting test: NCSecDesc
         Error NT AUTHORITY\ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS doesn't have
            Replicating Directory Changes In Filtered Set
         access rights for the naming context:
         DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=mh-man,DC=biz
         Error NT AUTHORITY\ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS doesn't have
            Replicating Directory Changes In Filtered Set
         access rights for the naming context:
         DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=mh-man,DC=biz
         ......................... DC2 failed test NCSecDesc
      Starting test: NetLogons
         Unable to connect to the NETLOGON share! (\\DC2\netlogon)
         [DC2] An net use or LsaPolicy operation failed with error
         67, The network name cannot be found..
         ......................... DC2 failed test NetLogons
Starting test: SystemLog
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:40:54
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x00000032
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:40:54
            Event String:
            The time service detected a time difference of greater than 5000 milliseconds for 900 seconds. The time difference might be caused by synchronization with low-accuracy time sources or by suboptimal
network conditions. The time service is no longer synchronized and cannot provide the time to other clients or update the system clock. When a valid time stamp is received from a time service provider, the time service will correct itself.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:41:53
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:43:06
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:45:15
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:47:14
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:48:22
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:49:34
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:50:45
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:52:55
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         An error event occurred. EventID: 0x00000406
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:52:59
            Event String:
            The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to retrieve new Group Policy settings for this user or computer. Look in the details tab for error code and description. Windows will
automatically retry this operation at the next refresh cycle. Computers joined to the domain must have proper name resolution and network connectivity to a domain controller for discovery of new Group Policy objects and settings. An event will be logged when
Group Policy is successful.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:54:21
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:58:35
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   16:59:48
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   17:00:59
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   17:02:11
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   17:03:24
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   17:05:39
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000008E
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   17:06:47
            Event String:
            The time service has stopped advertising as a time source because the local clock is not synchronized.
         A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x00000018
            Time Generated: 09/17/2014   17:11:36
            Event String:
            Time Provider NtpClient: No valid response has been received from domain controller DC1.test.com after 8 attempts to contact it. This domain controller will be discarded as a time source and
NtpClient will attempt to discover a new domain controller from which to synchronize. The error was: The peer is unreachable.
         ......................... DC2 failed test SystemLog
Pradip Sisodiya

Hello,
please upload the following files so we could understand your setup:
ipconfig /all >c:\ipconfig.log [from each DC/DNS Server]
dcdiag /v /c /d /e /s:dcname >c:\dcdiag.log
repadmin /showrepl dc* /verbose /all /intersite >c:\repl.log ["dc* is a place holder for the starting name of the DCs if they all begin the same (if more then one DC exists)]
dnslint /ad /s "DCipaddress" (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/321045)
ADREPLSTATUS
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30005 can also be exported to file.
As the output will become large, DON'T post them into the thread, please use Windows OneDrive (https://onedrive.live.com) [with open access!]
and add the link from it here. Also the /e in dcdiag scans the complete forest, so better run it on COB.
Best regards
Meinolf Weber
MVP, MCP, MCTS
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
My Blog: http://blogs.msmvps.com/MWeber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
Twitter:

J1INCHLN Create challan not considering some documents

Hi,
J1inchln not considering some documents.
When i checked in fagll03 those documents are not cleared , it still reamin as open items.
In j1inmis report those docments which are not consdered by j1inchln are displaying.
Because of this some price difference is coming. What is the soluton for this.
Please provide the necessary information.
regards,
Haripriya

without updating business place/section and recipient type you can't update internal challan through J1INCHLN, until those documents showing open items.
update the business place/section code through J1INPP
then you can execute J1INCHLN
let me know the status
write validation for business place/section code as required field at the time of document entry for avoiding future mistakes
assign points
Edited by: Sai Krishna Vallurupalli on Jun 26, 2008 11:43 AM

Quiz questions answered not considered

Hello,
I created a multiple choice quiz with a few questions, but as I preview it (in a browser and in the project preview section of Cp), or publish it and play it (same places), the answers that I enter are not being considered, every time I keep getting the "You did not answer this question completely" message when I review the quiz after getting the score. The correct question is selected properly on each slide, where I click on the circle to the left of the correct question.
Thank you for your help with this,
Manuel

Manuel,
Your quiz question slide in this project may be corrupted. Try opening a new blank project and insert ONE multi-choice or True/false quiz question there and test the functionality. Does a new blank project work properly?
If so, delete the problem slide from your existing project and re-insert new ones to replace it. Let us know if that works.
One more thing. DO NOT REMOVE any of the default question slide text captions from quiz slides. Doing that can cause strange behaviours.

V_V2 not considering GR time in STO in GR end time

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for