Valid to date for BOM Header and Item

Hello everyone,
I have been searching for "valid-to" date for BOM header and Items since several days but no luck ..
I know we can see it using transactions cs11/cs03 etc. But i wish to know the table where they are stored. As I need to extract them to BW.
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Anuj

Hi Anuj
In table STPO,the field AEDAT gets updated only when a change number is used,otherwise the valid to date will be shown nil here.
And also ref the link
Problem finding Valid To Date or Change number to on BOM
pavan

Similar Messages

  • Which BAPI is for reading Header and Item for BOM.

    Hi All,
    I am using BAPI named 'CSAP_MAT_BOM_READ' to read Material type BOM header and Item.
    1. Is there any BAPI available to read Equipment Header and Item  ?
    2. Is there any BAPI available to read Functional Loc Header and Item  ?
    3. Any BAPI to Write into Database table from my internal table (Header and Item) ?
    Edited by: amit soni on Aug 26, 2011 11:25 AM

    1. BAPI_EQUI_GETDETAIL
    2. BAPI_FUNCLOC_GETDETAIL
    3. BAPI_EQUI_CREATE, BAPI_FUNCLOC_CREATE for equipment, and functional location respectively.
    Have you browse in BAPI transactions?

  • Query to display BOMs Header and Item

    Hello SAP gurus
    I am trying to create a query to display BOMs with header and item. For that I am using tables MAST, STKO and STPO.
    The table join is:
    MAST -> STKO -> STPO
    MAST - WERKS, STLNR and STLAL
    STKO - STLNR and STPOZ
    The system dont show anything...
    Can someone help me?
    Thanks in advance.
    Adelmo Silva

    Yes, it works but...
    If I have 2 alternatives, the system show everything even if i select alternative 1 or 2.
    I am missing something... because system is showing all alternatives...
    System is showing something like this:
    Material     BOM     AltBOM     BOM St     Item     ICt     Component     Valid from     Quantity     Un
    726121012     00131075     1     01     0010     L     109219     17-12-2007     0,200     KG
    726121012     00131075     1     01     0020     L     109230     17-12-2007     0,003     KG
    726121012     00131075     1     01     0030     L     109232     17-12-2007     1,166     M2
    726121012     00131075     1     01     0040     L     726004012     17-12-2007     0,120     M3
    726121012     00131075     1     01     0010     L     109526     17-12-2007     0,200     KG
    726121012     00131075     1     01     0020     L     109232     17-12-2007     1,166     M2
    726121012     00131075     1     01     0030     L     726004012     17-12-2007     0,120     M3
    Edited by: Adelmo Silva on Jan 9, 2008 9:07 AM

  • Tables for BOM Header and Components

    Dear Friends,
    Please let me know which tables provide a link between the header Material and corresponding Component Materials of a BOM?
    I have seen STKO and STPO but couldn't find such a link in them. STPO gives the component material but I couldn't get any link to Header material.
    Regards,
    Alok.

    Hello Alok,
    Table for BOM header             - STKO
    Table for BOM item                - STPO
    Table for material to BOM link - MAST
    Check if MARC table has a material in it and the same material is available in MAST also, it means that BOM has been created for that material..
    If Material is available in MARC and not available in MAST, it means BOM has not been created for that material.
    Reward Points, if useful.
    Regards,
    Nitin.

  • Disabling partner data tab at header and item.

    25.11.2008
    Hi friends,
    Is there any user exit to disable 4 out of the 5 partners in the partner functions tab at header and item level as my requirement is not to allow the user to change the partner functions SP, SH,BP,PY. I cant use SHD0 or  use the not-changeable  function in VOPA hence the need for user exit.  
    Please suggest.
    Regards,
    Udaynath

    Dear Udaynath,
    try with:
    Path: SPRO --> IMG --> Sales and Distribution --> Basic Functions --> Partner Determination --> Set up Partner Determination
    Choose Activity: Set Up Partner Determination for Sales Document Header
    Select Partner: TA, and click: Partner Function in Procedure
    Give Work Area as, say TA and WE (or SH).
    Now, in next screen, click Box: N, to avoid changes in Sales Doc. i.e. Sales Order.
    Similary, maintain for Bill-to-Party and Payer.
    User won't be able to make changes in Partner Fucton in Sales Doc.
    Best Regards,
    Amit

  • User exit for change PO (me22n) for  save header and item text.

    Hi Experts,
    I have a requirement to read the header texts/item text  at run time .
    please tell me is there any  save user exit for tc me22n .
    Thanks in Advance.
    Paresh

    Transaction Code - ME21N                    Create Purchase Order
    Exit Name           Description
    LMEDR001            Enhancements to print program
    LMELA002            Adopt batch no. from shipping notification when posting a GR
    LMELA010            Inbound shipping notification: Transfer item data from IDOC
    LMEQR001            User exit for source determination
    LMEXF001            Conditions in Purchasing Documents Without Invoice Receipt
    LWSUS001            Customer-Specific Source Determination in Retail
    M06B0001            Role determination for purchase requisition release
    M06B0002            Changes to comm. structure for purchase requisition release
    M06B0003            Number range and document number
    M06B0004            Number range and document number
    M06B0005            Changes to comm. structure for overall release of requisn.
    M06E0004            Changes to communication structure for release purch. doc.
    M06E0005            Role determination for release of purchasing documents
    ME590001            Grouping of requsitions for PO split in ME59
    MEETA001            Define schedule line type (backlog, immed. req., preview)
    MEFLD004            Determine earliest delivery date f. check w. GR (only PO)
    MELAB001            Gen. forecast delivery schedules: Transfer schedule implem.
    MEQUERY1            Enhancement to Document Overview ME21N/ME51N
    MEVME001            WE default quantity calc. and over/ underdelivery tolerance
    MM06E001            User exits for EDI inbound and outbound purchasing documents
    MM06E003            Number range and document number
    MM06E004            Control import data screens in purchase order
    MM06E005            Customer fields in purchasing document
    MM06E007            Change document for requisitions upon conversion into PO
    MM06E008            Monitoring of contr. target value in case of release orders
    MM06E009            Relevant texts for "Texts exist" indicator
    MM06E010            Field selection for vendor address
    MMAL0001            ALE source list distribution: Outbound processing
    MMAL0002            ALE source list distribution: Inbound processing
    MMAL0003            ALE purcasing info record distribution: Outbound processing
    MMAL0004            ALE purchasing info record distribution: Inbound processing
    MMDA0001            Default delivery addresses
    MMFAB001            User exit for generation of release order
    MRFLB001            Control Items for Contract Release Order
    AMPL0001            User subscreen for additional data on AMPL
    No of Exits:         35
    USER EXIT
    http://www.sap-img.com/abap/a-short-tutorial-on-user-exits.htm
    http://www.sapgenie.com/abap/code/abap26.htm
    http://www.sap-img.com/abap/what-is-user-exits.htm
    http://wiki.ittoolbox.com/index.php/HOWTO:Implement_a_screen_exit_to_a_standard_SAP_transaction
    http://www.easymarketplace.de/userexit.php
    http://www.sap-img.com/abap/a-short-tutorial-on-user-exits.htm
    http://www.sappoint.com/abap/userexit.pdfUser-Exit
    http://www.sap-img.com/ab038.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/64/72369adc56d11195100060b03c6b76/frameset.htm
    http://www.sap-img.com/abap/a-short-tutorial-on-user-exits.htm
    http://www.sap-img.com/abap/what-is-user-exits.htm
    http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/eac/knowledgebaseAnswer/0,295199,sid63_gci982756,00.html
    Rewards if useful.........
    Minal

  • SQVI for BOM header and component -reg

    Hi ,
    Requirement is we need to download BOM header wise Components for the BOM headers across the plants
    As it is of mass and for around 7000 BOM headers we need the details , i have created a SQVI query using MAST , STKO and STPO
    but when i execute it in masss inputting the BOM headers  results are not correct  with errors like repetitions , not matching with CS03 etc...
    is there any other effective way for this requirement ?
    i need to input the BOM header material and where and all plants they have BOM i need to get the corresponding BOM components
    pl suggest  soon as it is relevant for year end
    Madhu Kiran

    Hi ,
    Tried with the combination of MAST--STKO-STAS----STPO , still having issues
    SQVI results shows combination of soem BOM headers and components which are not yet all linked through BOM , wehn i cross check the result through CS03 , for the BOM header , plant there is no BOM still SQVI shows the records again with repititions
    dont know which is  missing as earlier i used to feel this SQVI is effective  but i think if we use more number of tables we get issues ..
    i can not ask for ABAP report development as this is one time activity required for year end things
    if some one can share any doc on this please share, as i tried and tired with all combinations
    can not use the function module as i need to input materials in mass
    pl guide
    Madhu kiran

  • User exit for controling header and item division

    Hi all,
    Currently there is restriction in sales document for header division and item division i.e. if header division is 10 then it is not accepting the products of division 20, 30, 40, 50 at item level.
    If the restriction is removed then it will allow products of all division in a sales document irrespective of header division (if the customer is extended for all the sales area).
    But we would like to allow products of division 10, 20 and 30 in one sales document if header division is 10 or 20 or 30.
    How can it possible? Can it be possible through user exit? Any standard user exit is available or we would have to develop one?
    Please guide me how to go about.
    Regards
    Rajesh T.

    Thanks Navaneetha Krishnan,
    1. Please give some more inputs on Cross Division,
    2. To enable to incorporate other division than header at a item level is ok, but restriction on some division at item level is what i want to know, weather through user exit and which user exit? or I will have to create user define User Exit?
    e.g. customer 1234 is created for all the sales area
    Sales areas are : 1000  10  10
                              1000  10  20
                              1000  10  30
                              1000  10  40
                              1000  10  50
    now in ZOR Sales document(where there is no restriction of item division) if I enter sales area 1000  10  10 at header it will allow the product of all division.
    but i want if i put at header 1000  10  10 then it should allow the products of division 10 and 20 only and not to allow products of divsion 30,40,50 in one sales document
    similar if i put sales area 1000  10  30 at header level it should allow me to enter products of division 30,40,50 and should not allow products 10, 20 in one sales docuemnt
    I think this is more clear. request you all to provide details ASAP
    regards
    Rajesh T.

  • 'Valid to' dates for both the Header & the components in the BOM report.

    Hi Experts,
    My Requirement:
    Need to display the 'Valid to' dates for both the Header & the components in the BOM report.
    Right now we are using the Functional modules 'GET_STKO' & 'GET_STPO' for the header
    & the components respectively. The report gives the correct output for the all the BOM alternatives
    which exist. But for the BOM alternatives which have been deleted(updated in STKO-LKENZ)
    'Valid to' dates are displayed as'00/00/0000'.
    (Note:ECM is used for BOMs)
    Is there any Logical Database that I can fetch the 'Valid to' dates of both BOM Header & components
    which are deleted?
    Regards,
    Mahesh

    Dear Mahesh,
    In my understanding I dont think you cannot get the valid to date for BOM header,unless a ECN,(engineering change number) is
    used to set the deletion flag.In otherwords none of the business sets for all these BOM's the valid to date(which means the
    default valid to date 31.12.9999 is taken).
    Check with this FM, CS_BOM_EXPL_MAT_V2 whether can you get the valid to date for the components(infact here also the
    valid from date given in the input screen impacts the report output).
    Check and revert back.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • Valid To Date in BOM

    hii
    Can we change Valid To Date in BOM??By default it is 31.12.9999.i want to change it to 25.5.2007.
    Thanks
    varun

    Hi Varun,
    As per my observation, we cannot set valid to date for a BOM. When you delete the BOM then the deletion date will becomes valid to date, the same will apply to items within BOM.
    Thw work around is you can create production version in MRP4 view and set the vaild from and valid to date for this version and assign this to part with BOM details. Now the BOM will be picked up as per the validity of the version.
    You have to give BOM selection criteria is "selection by production version" in MRP4 view.
    Regards
    TAJUDDIN

  • Checkbox in header and item level records.

    Hello Freinds,
    I have a requirment in which I need to display checkboxes in front of header as well as item level records. I am trying to make a copy of standard transaction VL37. This transaction uses the REUSE_ALV_HIERSEQ_LIST_DISPLAY for displaying header and item level data. I debugged and found that in the alv layout there is a field with name box name. If we pass the name of header internal table to that field then we can get checkbox in front of header level records and if we pass item level internal table name then it shows the checkbox in front of item level records.
    Can anyone provide some possibility of adding checkbox for both header and item level records while using the same ALV FM.

    Hello Harsh,
    I am also kind of facing the same issue. I have used the FM REUSE_ALV_HIERSEQ_LIST_DISPLAY for ALV display. And I need to add checkbox at item level.
    I have tried to add checkbox through field catalog. Following is the code I'm writing.
    l_wa_fieldcat-fieldname = l_c_flag.
    l_wa_fieldcat-tabname   = l_c_item.
    l_wa_fieldcat-checkbox  = abap_true.
    *l_wa_fieldcat-edit_mask = abap_f.
    l_wa_fieldcat-edit      = abap_true.
    l_wa_fieldcat-key       = abap_true.
    l_wa_fieldcat-seltext_m = l_c_flag.
    APPEND l_wa_fieldcat to em_it_fieldcat.
    But in this case the checkbox appears in disabled form.
    Can you please help? Could you be a bit elaborate on your answer i.e. the code snippet? Many thanks.
    Regards,
    Debapriya

  • LIS header and ITEM ds

    Could you guys please help understand how i can retreive LIS header and ITEM level DS? what is that contains and how i can use that inforamation in BW?
    do i need to have diferrent target for Both DS?
    any details about this will be apreaciated....

    hi,
    hope u r using the LO extractions.
    for loading data to the BW for LO header and item for any applications, hope u can use different DSO/ODS at the first level and can combine the data in the next level with cube. if you do this type then memory is saved in the second level but report performance will be low.
    in the second lvele also if u use two cube to store data and using multiprovider combine both the cubes to achieve effective and effiecient reports with good performance.
    Ramesh

  • Same condition type on header and item level = printing problem

    Hi
    I have a customer using some condition types on both item level and header level in quotations, orders, invoices ...
    In the pricing procedures it is customized (V_T683S-DRUKZ) that the conditions must be printed on header level (that is at the bottom of the documents).
    My job is to make the Smartform to print the documents, and I want it of course to be as close to SAP standard as possible.
    SAP standard will print these conditions on header level even if the conditions are at item level, but my customer wants the conditions created on header level to be printed on header level and conditions created on item level to be printed on item level.
    I'm no pricing expert, so my question is:
    Will it be fair if I tell the customer that using the same condition types on header and item level is bad practices - or at least bad karma?
    Best regards
    Thomas Madsen Nielsen

    Hi Shiva Ram and Madhu
    I have no problem understanding header vs. item conditions, so I really don't see anything in oss note 876617, that is relevant in this case.
    Madhu - I do not agree that everything is fine. My issue is that I want to stick as closely to SAP standard customizing as possible. In SAP standard customizing of a condition type you can use the flag V_T683S-DRUKZ to determine if the condition should be printed on header OR item level - you can not choose both header AND item level.
    I have a SAP standard smartform using two functions modules for reading header and item conditions. RV_PRICE_PRINT_ITEM and RV_PRICE_PRINT_HEAD. These function modules are based on the DRUKZ customizing flag and a condition marked for printing on header level will be supplied by RV_PRICE_PRINT_HEAD even when the condition is on item level.
    My point is: SAP standard customizing does not support printing of same condition on both header and item level. I can of course write tons of code to work around this problem, but that would be bad practices

  • Check box in header and item

    Hi,
         I have a small problem regarding the checkboxes in the hierarchical Display.The challenge is i am unable to get the checkboxes for both header and item details in the hierarchy display.
                          Either header or item is getting the checkbox not both. Also, if a header checkbox is checked all the items corresponding to it should get checked automatically.
                        So please let me know the solution to this mystery.

    Hi,
    1.  If you want to calculate tax in FB50 , you have to select teh Calculate tax indicator in the  header & you have to give Tax code in teh respective line .
    Even if you give tax code in the line item  without tick the Calculate Tax indicator in the header system won't calculate tax.
    2.Tax codes are created  under teh TAX procedure.Thisd tax procedure is assgined to country.
    So  the tax codes you are creating are country specific.
    chandra

  • How to get header and item data in ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST ?

    Hi all,
    How can I get header and item data in me_process_po_cust~process_account ? I have to do some validation for account assignment catagory in item overview.

    Hi ,,
    Further make the following  changes in method IF_EX_ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST~PROCESS_ITEM.
    Get Line item data using method:
    CALL METHOD IM_ITEM->GET_DATA    
      RECEIVING
          RE_DATA = W_ITM_DATA.
    and then validate the item data from structure  W_ITM_DATA..
    Same as follows for Header Records:
    In method IF_EX_ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST~PROCESS_Header.
    Thanks
    Shambhu

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to create a Purchase Requisition for a material component in WBS or NW?

    Hello All, I have created a project with the following structure: Project Defination (Construction of Sub station)       Main WBS                Level 1 WBS                          Level 2 WBS                                    Network for level 2 W

  • ITunes 7.3 & iPhone

    Current iTunes version is 7.2. At least that's the version currently showing under the iTunes Download. The iPhone Specs say it needs 7.3 or later. Is this correct? If so, I think Apple would be smart to make 7.3 available before 6/29. If the Spec is

  • I have 3 computers in my home and would like for all to b...

    i have 3 computers in my home and would like for all to be able yto connect to the internet using my linksys router.  the only one currently able to connect is the one he router is connected yto.  can you help

  • UAC Behaviour when set to "Prompt for Consent on the Secure Desktop"

    We are in the process of testing UAC on Windows 8.1. UAC is enabled for admins and the setting for "Behavior of the elevation prompt for administrators in Admin Approval mode" is set to "Prompt for consent on the secure desktop". This results in the

  • Slow mac and system break down

    hi there My MacBookPro (2010) started to run slowly. The recent couple of weeks it started to break down too. Last time, just a minute ago. Can anyone make anything out of this crash report, cause I really cannot read programming at all. Any help, re