Validate value in Contract ME31K

I have created a Contract for value $100,000 USD
all purchase orders in excess of $100,000 must aggregate a condition type that reduce PRXX to 50% (Automatic).
Wich table use ME31K?
Can I control contract value in condition type??
Thanks in advance.
Regards-.

hi,
You can find the contract details in the table EKKO and EKPO....
You can have the 50% cash discount via creating the condition type in the PO...
So, when you make the IR document, here use the document type as NET and then post the invoice....Then you can see the entries of cash discount in the respective account....
Regards
Priyanka.P

Similar Messages

Item wise target value in Contract (ME31K)

Hi,
If i have 2 line items in Contract (me31K), ie 2 different materials, can I have different Target value for each line item.
Regards,
Karthik

Hi,
I hope item wise target value is not possible, but through target quantity for every item you can control it.
Regards,
Prabu

Sales order value exceeds value of contract

Hi,
when we create a sales order with ref to contract it allows to create a sales order for more value than contract. validation is in place is sales order quantity should not be more than contract quantity.
We need to have an check on the value of sales order rather than quantity of a sales order.
Pls suggest.
thanks

Kindly goto the value contract material item category at VOV7.
Please check the value contract item is assigned and also check the field Contract release control,
Maintain the entry as " B ".
Now u check by repeating the transactions.
Hope it useful,. please post if u have any further clarifications,
Reward points if useful,
Regards,
kaleeswaran B

Function Module to find out the release value in contract

Dear All,
I have to upload the contract with new accoutn assignment without changing the existing contract. For that i have to download all the existing contract data with value.
In that case i have some issues regarding the value.
For example : In the system old contract is created with value 1000 and the released value as 500.
In that case i have to uload the new contract with all the details of existing contract with value of 500 (1000-500=500).
How can i get the value (500) and from which table.Is there any functional module to find out the release value in contract.
Thanks and regads,
PM
Edited by: PM on Jan 21, 2010 8:40 AM
Edited by: PM on Jan 22, 2010 9:48 AM

Hi
You need to link the table VBFA and VBAK.
For a contract you can check all the subsequent document (which you can filter whether you want to see Order / delivery / Billing) in VBFA and then from there pick the subsequent document no. and then from VBAK you can pick the Net value of these subsequent documents, and so you will have both the values (value of Contract and value in subsequent document) and you can determine the balance value.
Regards
Amitesh Anand

Release PO created more than target value in contract

System at times creates release PO even though the accumulated value of released Purchase orders is greater than contract target value. We have the config settings in place to stop this. And it works OK all the time but fails sometimes !. We have batch job in place that runs every 20 minutes to create release POs. We are able to see in the job log (at 2:00 pm run) that system has stopped release PO creation. In the next run (at 2:20 pm), it has created the PO strangely! We checked if there is any change (config, variant, PR, contract) in this 20 minutes time gap between batch job runs but there is not any.
This issue is not replicable. It does not happen often. But couple of weeks back it happened once. And it has happened today. Any pointers would be helpful.
Below is the screenshot of 2:00 pm run
Below is the screenshot of 2:20 pm run

Hi,
It seems the message 06 042 was not issued in 2.20 job run. Hope the issue can be resolved by the KBA: 1929354 - Message 06 042 'Target value of contract & exceeded by & &' or the note: 1590695 - 06042 - target value check in release order fails
Please refer the KBA and revert back.
Regards,
AKPT

How to map values between Contract and Purchase Order...

Hi friends,
We are using SRM 5.0 (ECS). I am facing a problem with Purchase Order.
. I am creating Contract locally through Live Auction. After that I am creating Purchase Order through Live Auction. So in Purchase Order Quantity, Net Price, Gross Price, and Long Text etc. not coming which is defined in Contract. PO capturing the values from Live Auction, means no relation between the Contract and Purchase Order. After making Contract again I have to changes in the Purchase Order.
So how to map the values from Contract to PO in SRM? I want to map between contract and Purchase Order like R/3. At the time of creation of PO ( in R/3 ) we can adopt the Contract so all the relevant values comes from Contract to PO. In SRM how will I do?
Please suggest me.

When you create PO and a contract from a Live Auciton, they will not be mapped.
While creating a PO (BBP_POC - Process Purchase Order); in the PO line item assign the contract and item reference. Only then they will be linked.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Kathirvel

Open Target Quantity and Open Target Value in Contract

Hi,
When we execute transaction 'ME3N', it displays the report which is having columns as 'Open Target Quantity' and 'Open Target Value'. I have the similar requirement to read this 'Open Target Quantity' and 'Open Target Value' of contract.
Is there any table which stores these values or is there any function module which gives the value of 'Open Target Quantity' and 'Open Target Value'.
Thanks,
Siddhi

Hi,
Thank you for the reply.
I tried to find that way too. But I was not able to get the table / field for 'Open Target Quantity' or 'Open Target Value'.
Now, I am looking for the logic to get the 'Open Target Quantity' and 'Open Target Value' in contract.
Can anybody please help me with getting this logic?
Thanks,
Siddhi

Best practice to use contract(ME31K) in reference a PR

Hi,
I create a PR(me51n) with service (the commitment is on the PR), next I create a contract(me31k) in reference with the PR. In the contract I do some change, I subdivide the service in two lines. After with ME57 I assign the contract with the PR.
When I want to create a PO (contract release ord), should I us the contract in reference or the PR. If I use the contract my commitment do not follow and if I use 50% for my PR the commitment is used at 100%.
What is the best practice?
Best regards

Hi,
If I use the entire PR it is true but if I use only 50% of it. The commitment of the PR disappears and the commitment of the PO is 50% of the PR. And I want to found a way to transfert only the % of the commiment used in the PO.
Best regards

Price condition determination for purchasing contract(ME31K)

Hi Experts,
     It is possible to apply price condition determination in purchasng contract(ME31K)? We had maintain the price condition for below keys: WBS/Material number and this condition record work well in purchase order. But I hope that this condition record is applied in pruchasing contract when we create contract by ME31K. Plz kindly give me a suggestion.
So I want to check the condition dtermination is whether fullfil my requirement. If we can not use the price condition determination to get the net price, then we only go for user-exit to get it.
Thank you very much in advance.

>
Gangrong Chen wrote:
> Hi Experts,
>
>      It is possible to apply price condition determination in purchasng contract(ME31K)? We had maintain the price condition for below keys: WBS/Material number and this condition record work well in purchase order. But I hope that this condition record is applied in pruchasing contract when we create contract by ME31K. Plz kindly give me a suggestion.
>
> So I want to check the condition dtermination is whether fullfil my requirement. If we can not use the price condition determination to get the net price, then we only go for user-exit to get it.
>
> Thank you very much in advance.
Why not, in me31k, click on condition button on toolbar for item conditions and for header conditions, click on menu bar path HEADER>CONDITIONS and maintain your conditions accordingly.

How will i get Netorder value against contract

Hi,
I have loaded 2lis_02_hdr, itm, scl datasources in to customized cube which contains Purchasing document(EBELN), Item(EBELP), Doctype(BSART), Contract(KONNR), Item(KTPNR), Netordervalue(NETWR)
Here my requirment is I want to cummulate Netordervalue against Contract no.
In query level if I selected Purchasing doc with doctype=WK(it means it is value Contract), it is not showing any Ordervalue against Contract.
How will acheive this to get Cumulative order value against Contract.
Please share your suggestions to acheive this requirement.
For clarifications please revert back.
Thanks in Advance
   sudhir.

Hi,
For the above requirment I have coded a program in Endroutine but it is not populating cummulative Order value against Contract.
DATA:
      WA_ty_t_TG_1        TYPE tys_TG_1.
data: netsum type char15.
types:begin of ty_net,
    netsum type /BI0/OINET_PO_VAL,
    V_EBELN TYPE /BI0/OIOI_EBELN,
    end of ty_net.
    data:t_net type standard table of ty_net .
    data:wa_net type ty_net.
SORT RESULT_PACKAGE BY CONTRACT.
<b>loop at RESULT_PACKAGE INTO WA_ty_t_TG_1.</b>
      WA_NET-V_EBELN = <RESULT_FIELDS>-CONTRACT.
      AT END OF CONTRACT.
        netsum = WA_ty_t_TG_1-NET_PO_VAL + NETSUM.
      ENDAT.
      WA_NET-netsum = NETSUM.
      APPEND WA_NET TO T_NET.
      CLEAR:T_NET,NETSUM.
ENDLOOP.
    loop at RESULT_PACKAGE assigning <RESULT_FIELDS> .
        READ TABLE T_NET INTO WA_NET WITH KEY
                              V_EBELN = <RESULT_FIELDS>-CONTRACT
        <RESULT_FIELDS>-/BIC/YNET_VAL = NETSUM.
        CLEAR: WA_NET-NETSUM.
    endloop.
    <RESULT_FIELDS>-/BIC/YNET_VAL = netsum.
    CLEAR:NETSUM,<RESULT_FIELDS>-/BIC/YNET_VAL.
    ENDLOOP.
I have coded above one..let me know what mistake I have done.in the bolded loop I have given INTO instead of Assigning, because I need all records which assigns to WorkArea, but while executing DTP its leading to shortdump.if I replace Assigning statement,its working fine. but zero values in output( I think wrong in logic part)
Let me know the brief coding part if I am wrongly coded.
Thanks in Advance
sudhir.

PO not allowed beyond the target value of contract.

Hi Forum,
I have a Contract, when I create a PO with ref to the Contract, it should not allow the PO to be created beyond the target value of the Contract. Where should I make the configuration settings for this. Whenever the PO created beyond the target value it should give an error and should not allow to proceed further. Please advise.
Thanks in advance.
Ashish

Hi
Please maintain the message as an error
06-042 Target value of contract & exceeded by & &
in SPRO-> IMG-> Material Management-> Purchasing-> Environment Data-> Define Attributes of System Messages

Billing value should not exceed contract(value based contract) value

Hi,
We are using value based contract and in item category we set E in incompletion rule which stops me to create relaease order where its value exceeds the contract value.
But via release order we recognize revenue(service based revenue recognition) and we do billing directly through contract via milestone billing plan,
At present i can bill more then my contract value.Now i want to system should not allow me to bill mre then contract value.
I checked the option in VOV8 and VOV7 but all those are meant for release order not for bliing.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Satya
You can set the billing amount in milestone billing plan itself. based on that value billing will done.

Modify target value in contract to be more than 1 000 000 000 LE

I am working in ECC6, MM module,
i want ask some quistions,
1-modify target value in contract to be more than 1 000 000 000 LE.
2-printing all un released documents.
3-all available reports detailed in MM.
4-modify percentage in fields to be 3 digits instead of 2 digits.
BR,
Amr Awad

Hi,
if you need to create an appropriate content structure, you have to consider many aspects. If the amount of content is small, many of these aspects are not that important, but if the number of elements/pages are getting larger, they will get important.
One aspect to know is the way how this content is accessed. Is your primary access pattern search or browse? In the search case the location of an element can be quite random, but when you browse you will follow an (intuitive) pattern.
Another aspect is the the kind of access. Do you have many create/delete operations? Only read?
Then: Are these content elements maintained by the system itself (for example by an automatic importer) or are editors required to work on these elements?
The better you can answer such questions, the better it's possible to model a content structure. In practice of CQ5/CRX a few patterns have established like
Natural Hierarchy (like: continent/country/state or brand/branch/product/)
A total ordering of all elements can be established (like postal codes: There you can structure by the orders of the numbers: 5368 could become /5/3/6/8)
A total ordering of elements is being created artificially by hashing methods. This approach cannot/should not be used for content which is maintained by humans.
(and probably more)
In any way I would recommend you to check David's model at http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/DavidsModel
kind regards,
Jörg

Sales order should not copy the net value from contract

Hi,
When we are creating the sales order,Where we can maintain that sales order should not copy the net value from contract.
Regards
Prabudh

Hi,
When I am creating the sales order with reference to contract,it's copying the net value and quantity from the contract.
But I want that sales order should not copy the net value and quantity from the contract and user can take new required quantity at the time creating the sales order.
Regards
Prabudh

Validate value to be number when entering value

hi i what to validate value to be number when entering for example if am entering social security number i must make sure its number,i try convernumber but when i navigate away from field it put commas 22,222,222 instead of 22222222.am in jdeveloper 11.1.1.6.0
Edited by: adf009 on 2013/02/14 11:45 AM
Edited by: adf009 on 2013/02/14 12:08 PM

set the groupingUsed property to false.
<af:inputText label="Label 2" id="it2">
<f:convertNumber groupingUsed="false"/>
</af:inputText>

Validate value in Contract ME31K

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for