Validating order in KO88

Hi,
Some body know if there is an user exit to validate production order before execute the Settlement (KO88)???
Edited by: Marisol on Mar 9, 2010 8:09 PM

As an addendum to this thread, I have to say that the flushing order has been set not to be sorted; that is, 'getCacheSortedFlush()' on the environment object returns false. That way, I would have expected that the objects would be created in the database in the order they were created in my OCCI application, so foreign key constraints would pass.

Similar Messages

Error in Order Settlement (KO88) Complete PA transfer structure A1

Dear Gurus,
In order to close a Production Order
I am trying to Settle the order using KO88 after determining Variances using KKS2.
The System is showing Error "Complete PA transfer structure A1".
Pls guide what to do?
Himanshu

Go to KEI2 and assign any unassigned cost element used in the settlement to a CAOP value field for transfer structure A1

Order settlement KO88

Hallo Friend,
I am going for Order Settlement KO88. getting error massage If any one face this massage than please tell me Solution.
FI/CO interface: Balance in transaction currency
Message no. RW022
Diagnosis
The balances in transaction currency must be zero for each logical transaction when transferring to the FI/CO interface. A balance of " 39.001,60-" "INR" was determined for the logical transaction "000001".
System Response
The FI/CO interface does not process any transactions which have a balance in transaction currency other than zero.
Procedure
This is a system error of the calling application.

Hi, Check below SAP notes regarding this issue:
1523814 Transaction AIST ends with error RW022
1514384 Error message RW022
1444750 Postings without transaction currency

Determine all valid ORDERs for a Produced Good.

Hi All,
I need to determine the valid Order number for a produced goods:
Each Material that has been u201Cproducedu201D is fetched as follows:
if not i_marc[] is initial.
SELECT matnr
FROM aufm INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_aufm
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_marc where budat IN s_budat AND BWART = '101'
and matnr = i_marc-matnr
and werks = i_marc-werks.
endif.
Now I need to read all Order Numbers (AUFM-AUFNR),
Where Produced good AUFM-MATNR has atleast one record with Movement Type
AUFM-BWART is equal to u2018101u2019 or u2018102u2019 and posting date (AUFM-BUDAT) is within user defined date
range AND Plants (AUFM-WERKS) is within the user defined range.
Can some body help me in this?
Thanks,
Debrup.

Hi All,
I need to determine the valid Order number for a produced goods:
Each Material that has been u201Cproducedu201D is fetched as follows:
if not i_marc[] is initial.
SELECT matnr
FROM aufm INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_aufm
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_marc where budat IN s_budat AND BWART = '101'
and matnr = i_marc-matnr
and werks = i_marc-werks.
endif.
Now I need to read all Order Numbers (AUFM-AUFNR),
Where Produced good AUFM-MATNR has atleast one record with Movement Type
AUFM-BWART is equal to u2018101u2019 or u2018102u2019 and posting date (AUFM-BUDAT) is within user defined date
range AND Plants (AUFM-WERKS) is within the user defined range.
Can some body help me in this?
Thanks,
Debrup.

Error while running Internal Order Settlement (KO88)

Hi,
We are in ECC 6. We are facing an error while settling one internal order using T.Code KO88.
The error message says :
Execute amount settlement up to and including settlement period 001 2009 first
Message KD262
We have already settled the internal order upto previous month. But, we are unable to settle the order for the current month.
Any suggestion please.
Regards,
Ganesan

In production Order maintain Settlement type as Full Settlement.
In CO01 Create production Order or CO02 Change production order go to
Header -
> Settlement Rule
Maintain Category, Receiver, Percentage, FUL (as settlement type)
Change settlement type to FUL if it is PER.
PER Settlement Type - Only settles the cost incurred on the posting period
FUL Settlment Type - Settles all the cost incurred after the previous costing run

Asset value date in Internal order settlement ko88

Hi.
I have posted some expenses to the internal order. I m trying to settle it to AUC with tcode KO88.
In the selection screen of ko88 i gave asset value date as 15.07.2011 but system is posting with month end date only as 31.07.2011.
I read the sap note 98496. In that its mentioned that the asset value date given in settlement parameters will override the asset value date given in the selection screen of ko88.
I tried to update the AUC asset value date in KO02 where we give settlement rules but i couldnt find any field there.
Where do i update the AUC asset value date in settlement parameters. Can anyone provide me the tcode and the field where i update this asset value date.
Regards,
Padmavathi

Hi
You can the same in transaction code KO02
1. Click on 'Settlement Rule'
2 Select 'Goto' in toll bar
3.Select 'Settlement Parameter F8"
4 there you will get" Asset value date"
Table Name" COBRA" field "BZDAT"
Hope this will helpful for you
Regards
Praveen P C

PROCESS ORDER SETTLEMENT - KO88

Hi!
As per my knowledge KO88 will be done for OHDS and for Material. OHDS settlement will be done in month ending which results the difference between KSII and KP26.
Can anybody explain how the accounting entry will be generated at the time of Process order settlement of material i.e. KO88.
Sreenivas

Hi
Settlement entries are same as in production order. No diff
However, u must be aware settlement entries are dependent on status of process order. If status is DLV or TECO wip is calcelled and variances are calculated. If status if PREL or REL or PDLV wip entries are posted.
Hope you have made settings in WIP for offsetting entries
Pls assign points if this clarifies else send query with more explanation

Process order settlement Ko88 not working.

Hello Sapients,
i am getting a message:"There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible."
Following are the steps i cariried.
1.) created a Process order CR01
2.) did goods issue to the process order using MIGO_GI
3.) when i run KKAX I am able to the costs in WIP.
4.) but when i execute the ko88 for the particular process order systme is not settling any but instead giving me a message: "There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible."
5.) Could you please advise if I am missing any thing.
Thanks and Regards
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
Please, check if you have run the settlement already for period that you wants to do the settle by path KO88 -> goto -> previous settlement or by extras -> activate flow trace at Ko88 to analysis the problem.
Please, also verify the SAP note 179533. This note has some informations regarding the problem.
Regards,
Paulo

Message KD258 - Settle Process Order by KO88

Hi gurus,
When I run KO88 I get following message:
Final delivery not entered for the order. It is not technically completed.
I have checked in CO03 and the order was TECO before I try to settle it.
Does anybody can help me?
Thanks.

>
Osmar Tardivo wrote:
> Hi gurus,
>
>
> When I run KO88 I get following message:
>
> Final delivery not entered for the order. It is not technically completed.
>
> I have checked in CO03 and the order was TECO before I try to settle it.
>
> Does anybody can help me?
>
> Thanks.
Dear,
I assume the order is currently with TECO status, If the order has RESA status, then perform the following transactions in sequence.
1. You need to run WIP using KKAX
2. You need to run variance KKS2
3. Last KO88.
Regards,
Prasobh
Regards,
Prasobh

Update COPA characteristic values during order settlement - KO88

Hi,
We need to update some COPA characteristic values during order settlement using T-code KO88.
Looked for options in KEDR transaction, did not find any exits.
Could some one help us to resolve this issue.
Thanks
Vikram

Hello and thanks for your response.
We have actually created the new characteristic (WWCRE) and we are populating it in the user exit. I think the issue is that the characteristic may be 05012010 at the time of the sales order, but it is 04012010 at the time of billing.
Unfortunately, the PAOBJNR in the billing doc is the same as the order and the user exit doesn't seem to accept the changed value or create a new entry in the CE tables.
For example, if I change the sales order to cause a new WWCRE value, the system automatically generates a new PAOBJNR but at the time of billing, regardless of changes to the values, it simply keeps the old PAOBJNR from the sales order and doesn't reflect the changes.
I hope that makes some sense. Please let me know if you have any other suggestions.
>Ray

Validation Order

Hi all,
Is possible to define the order of Validation of a Entity?
I've defined a entity ProductEO, and it has Id, Description fields. Both are required, but Description has a Declared Validation Rules associated to it. It verify if Description contains invalid characters as *%$@, the problem is that my custom validation is executed and Description contains a invalid character, so a Exception is throw, after this the field is validated again and a Exception to Required Field is throw. In my GUI (Web Application) is show two messages, one to Invalid Characters and other to Required Field.
Anybody knows a solution for this?
Thanks

Add the first validation in the setter method, and the second validation as a method validation for that attribute.
check this:
http://mjabr.wordpress.com/2011/05/21/add-business-rule-in-the-setter-method-of-an-entity-attribute/

BAPI that creates an order settlement - KO88

Hi,
I'm trying to find a BAPI that creates a Single Order Settlement just like the KO88 transaction does.
Does anyone knows if there is a chance of existance of such a BAPI?

Hi,
Check with FM MAT_ORDER_SETTLEMENT_CREATE.
Thanks,
Asit Purbey

CO - Production order settlement(KO88)

Dear SAPns
1.Explain why the production order actual settlement have to do.
2. What is the financial impact (P&L and B/s) due to settlement of production order
3. Where/How the actual cost is calculated?
4.What is the benefit to do the settlement of production order.
Anybody have document regarding above pls send me.
My Id : [email protected]
Regds
Tamil

Hi,
Production order settlement is done to capture the variance and the WIP to the header material of production order. On execution of the settlement the entries for FI will be posted with respect to variance and WIP
Regards
Kaarthik.D
Assign points if useful

Investment Order Settelment Ko88

Hi, All
While running the settelment of Investment Order to AUC i Am getting the error like below,
Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 002 not filled
Message no. GLT2201
Diagnosis
The field Profit Center marked as balancing is not filled with any value in line item 002, even after document splitting.
System Response
The document cannot be posted.
Procedure
First check your entries.
Additional causes could be:
No value can be derived for this field from the current document data.
You have entered a document type that is not designed for this business purpose.
i checked all the settings, unable to find out the solution.
My document Splitting is Mandatory check for Profit centre and Business Area.
The Investment Order has both profit centre and Business Area filled in master.
Please Suggest.

Hi,
There would be 2 situations under which Error GLT2201 would pop up:
SITUATION 1 :
Kindly go to transaction code ACSET and check if you have activated the Account assignment feild for Account assignment object KOSTL.This   feild needs to be checked.
SITUATION 2 :
When the feild status for cost center and profit center have been suppressed in FS03.Kindly do the below required chnages to get rid of the error -
FS03 -> G/L account no. XXXXXX -> Field Status Group XXXX
        -> Additional Account Assignments
          -> Cost center   -> Suppressed
          -> Profit center -> Suppressed
The error is gotten in the first line item of document. This line item corresponds to the posting of account XXXXXX.Please simulate the document(F-90) to find the account.
Please change the field status for this account and test if ABIF is working without the error.
Please also see:
684659 : FAQ concerning account assignment objects as of Release 4.70
Regards Bernhard

Order Settlement (Ko88) Vs. Sales Order Settlement (VA88)

We would like to know what are the advantages and disadvantages of Production Order Settlement versus Sales Order Settlement.
What are the benefits between one and the other?
Please advice,
Thanks in advance,
Rio

Hello,
Thank you for replying.
We are an MTO Semiconductor manufacturing shop, High volume. somewhat repetitive but not frequent.
We have two clients:
Client 1 - Uses Standard Costing and Settles Production Orders to the Material itself.
Client 2 - Uses Actual Costing and Settles Production Orders to Sales Orders (automatic) then Settles Sales Orders to Profitability Analysi.
I'm hearing SAP does not recommend the process from Client 2 "Sales Order Settlement" because of the high volume of sales documents. still can't confirm this.
I would like to find out the following:
What are the Pros and Cons of Production order Settlement vs. Sales Order Settlement.
What are the reasons why one type of settlement is chosen over the other?
Also, I found some data from SAP Labs which relates to an Old Version of SAP, so I would like to know if this process is still current with Version 6.0
"...Settlement of the production order to the sales order is normally not required. The sales order item automatically picks up the cost incurred on the production order.
The production order must only be settled when:
- The production order is in a different company code than the sales order.
- The production order is a collective order
The sales order product cost processing will only pick up the cost on the top-level of a collective order, so the costs of the lower-level production orders must be settled to the highest level of the collective order..."
Please advice,
Rio

Validating order in KO88

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for