Validation for Cost center for Goods issue against the cost centers

Dear Friends
In my client place we have 6 plants are defined and profit centers are defined for each plant. Hence here each plant is one profit center. Cost centers are defined plant wise.
The requirement is when the goods issued to cost center system should check the cost center is defined against the plant. ( i.e., Cost center def against the Profit Center, and Profit center equal to Plant).
Is there any provision to assign the plant to profit center or vice versa?
Please guide me how to resolve the issue.
Thanks in advance.

Hi
Please check EC01. May be it can help you. But in my view it is not possible.

Similar Messages

Input cost center in Goods Issue

Can I input the cost center in Goods Issue or Goods Receipt transaction? I cannot find the cost center field in the forms setting?
Many thanks for the kind advice in advance?

Vijay Kumar,
Our version is 2005. According to Julie Jamieson's advice, in version 2007, thie field "Distr. Rule" = "Cost Center". Is it really impossible for version 2005 to input the cost center in Goods Issue or Goods Receipt? Your kind advice will be highly appreciated.
Ada

How to Default Cost Center During Goods Issue (tcode: MB1A) To Prod Order

Dear Experts,
How to default the Cost Center/ Profit Center during goods movement posting?
Currently, for Goods Issue transaction, the cost center show blank. Even i have default C.Center in cost element (OKB9)
Where to link Cost center/ Profit Center to MM module?
Need your help.
Thanks,
Kiran D

a. If you want to default a cost center to the transaction then use substitution. Give the default profit center in the cost center. so profit center will also get defaulted.
b. if you want to default the GL account then configure it in OBYC, then use OKB9 to give the default cost center and profit center.
anantha

Posting multiple goods issues against the same delivery

Hello gurus,
We are a fashion apparel company using ECC 6.0 and would like to know if it is possible to post mutliple goods issues against the same delivery?
I will explain the business requirement.
- We create a stock transport order to deliver 400 units of merchandise to on or our retail stores (STO is created and processed to a delivery).
- This information is passed down to our warehouse management system (which is not SAP)
- Our warehouse management system has the ability to split a delivery into multiple shipment when needed. For example, our warehouse may only be able to complete 250 units for our morning shipment and will therefore pick, pack and post this. This will feed back into SAP and process a 641 movement so that the units now show as "in transit". This is needed so that our stores can process the ASN and move the units into their inventory when they receive the merchandise later that day.
- During the afternoon, our warehouse will process the remaining 150 units and will ship this to our store later in the evening or next day.
Currently, we are not able to process another goods issue against a delivery as we close out the delivery during the first goods issue. We would prefer not to have to generate a new delivery for our DC and let them continue to process against the same delivery, but we are unsure how to configure this.
Any help or guideance would be extremely appreciated
Thanks in advance

Hi RJ,
First of all sorry to write such a lengthy reply,In one line if i want to summerize then it is not possible with standard SAP however we can achieve this by writing some piece of code in both the system
AS - IS
               Business process
          From business process point of view you are right that once the pick & pack is in process it is not advisable to create a new delivery document for balance quantity and share the same with WMS as then they have to create a new document in WMS and start picking based on that rather then the old delivery document number. if i am in your position then i can give a thought like this
e.g.
Delivery                                                  - 100 Unit
Shipment confirmation from WMS            -   60 Unit
Change in delievry quanity / Pick qty        -   60 Unit
Invoice from SAP                                    -   60 Unit
Second confirmation from WMS                          -   40 Unit
Change in the existing delivery quantity                -   Now here we have two option either
1) Change the delivery quantity / Pick qty to (60+40) =100 or
2) Remove the 60 and update 40 as delivery and pick quantity
Pros & Cons
if you will select option 1 then furhter invoice will happen for 100 unit which is incorrect as physically you are shipping only 40 unit
if you are selecting option 2 then the document flow is incorrect as you don't have history(in SAP) for the 60 unit which was shipped earlier
Solution ::
so in my opinion the best option is to create a seperate delivery document (store the old delviery number in one of the field of the new delivery and pass the same to custom segment of the IDoc) transmit the IDoc to WMS write the validation logic in WMS
Find the record with old deliver number in the WMS system, check the status whether it is active or inactive
if it is acitive Validate the Material + qty with the WMS record(Material + balance quantity) if both are same then pass the new deliery number to custom field of the WMS table
At the time of confirming back to the SAP, Write a piece of code in SAP that if the incoming idoc custom field(new delivery number) field is populated then ignore the orignal document number and post the document using the new delivery document number
Hope this help

Cost Center wise goods issue report

Hi,
Is there any standard report to see the stock of materials based on cost center. I tried MB51 & also put costcenter field in that report. But when i am running the report it is not showing against cost centers. It is showing against mov type 201 . When i select 201 & go to details than only i can see the cost center. Is it possible to see the cost center without selecting 201 & going to details. I mean to get the report only based on cost center & the stock.
Thanks
John

Hi
When you selected the cost center, it may be appearing in the column of "Hidden fields". So once you select it, by clicking on the appropriate arrow, you will bring this field into the other column where all the fileds which are appearing will come as display values in the report. Then you will click on the copy.
Now while you are in display mode of report, go to "settings" ---> Layout -
> save -
> give a name for your variant and then save.
This way this variant will be available for you next time to run. If you have administrative rights, you can save this variant available for all users or else you can save this for your user specific.

Notification Required if goods issue aganist the cost centre

Issue/Concern:-
          To reserve stock for a cost center & don't allow issue to another cost centre or notification should be sent to the user.
Description:-
Stock is reserved by creating reservation by MB21 for one cost centre e.g.1151-Production. We want to restrict this stock for the same Costcentre only.But when tried to issue stock to another cost center 11512-Maintanance,
              System should allow for goods issue of this stock to another cost center other than Prouction but notification sent to the Prouction CostCentre user who has done the reservation while issuing.
Kindly let me know if you require more clarifications on this.

Yes Exactly,
                  UserA     -
Reservation 0001--Req Date 03-04-2010Material M-Cost Centre Production
Now the     User B    -
Reservation 0002--Req Date 01-04-2010Material M-Cost Centre Maintanence
Then User A has to get an email alert notification while Material M issuing to the User B.

Cost center commitments reconcilation issue

Hi,
i have Cost Center Commitments Reconcilation issue.. one cost element values are not updating to BW from R/3 this is the issue we have .. RSA3 showing 0 Amount for that cost element.. i have tried to load upto PSA here also i am getting 0 values.. i have checked in table "COOI" i found the values for that cost element.. and also i have checked in ksb1 it is also showing the values... cost center commitments data source 0CO_OM_CCA_10 has no customer exist... could any one have any idea on this... what may cause the issue.....
Thanks & Regards
Sreekanth

Hi,
As per below the extractor is working fine. KSB1 displays the Actual Linte items and KSB2 displays the Commitments Line items. So the commitments extractor is working fine if the data matches with KSB2.
DataSource 0CO_OM_CCA_9 will give you the actual costs and matches with KSB1
Thanks,
Nagarjuna.
Edited by: Nagarjuna Reddy on Oct 20, 2011 9:07 AM

Dump while doing goods issue against order with movement type 261

Hi Team,
We are integrating Asset management process along with the goods issue against the order which is created with a business partner for movement type 261.
when we try to complete the process the system gives us a dump as described below.
please look through the dump and advice for the same.
Short text
    The current application triggered a termination with a short dump.
What happened?
    The current application program detected a situation which really
    should not occur. Therefore, a termination with a short dump was
    triggered on purpose by the key word MESSAGE (type X).
Error analysis
    Short text of error message:
    System error in the FI/CO interface
    Long text of error message:
     Diagnosis
         Updating of the FI/CO interface was called with object type "MKPF"
         yet the checks were run for object type "AMBU".
     System Response
         Checking and updating must be for the same object type.
     Procedure
         It has to do with a system error from the calling applications.
    Technical information about the message:
    Message class....... "RW"
    Number.............. 103
    Variable 1.......... "MKPF"
    Variable 2.......... "AMBU"
   Variable 3.......... " "
   Variable 4.......... " "
rigger Location of Runtime Error
   Program                                 SAPLMBWL
   Include                                 LMBWLU21
   Row                                     62
   Module type                             (FUNCTION)
   Module Name                             MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENT
46    IF xmkpf-xabln IS INITIAL.                               "note 434093
47        CALL FUNCTION 'MB_XAB_NUMBER_GET'.                   "note 434093
48    ENDIF.                                                   "note 434093
49
50 ENHANCEMENT-POINT MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENTS_01 SPOTS ES_SAPLMBWL STATIC.
51
52 ENHANCEMENT-POINT MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENTS_02 SPOTS ES_SAPLMBWL.
53    CALL FUNCTION 'MB_CREATE_MATERIAL_DOCUMENT_UT'
54         EXCEPTIONS
55           error_message = 4.
56 * As soon as we have started to put things into UPDATE TASK, we must
57 * ensure that errors definitely terminate the transaction.
58 * MESSAGE A is not sufficient because it can be catched from
59 * external callers which COMMIT WORK afterwards, resulting in
60 * incomplete updates. Read note 385830 for the full story.
61    IF NOT sy-subrc IS INITIAL.
>>>       MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE x NUMBER sy-msgno WITH            "385830
63                  sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
64 *     MESSAGE A263.
65    ENDIF.
66 * Optische Archivierung
67 * Spaete Erfassung mit Barcode
68 * Redesign of barcode handling -> note 780365
69   PERFORM barcode_update(sapmm07m) USING xmkpf-mblnr
70                                          xmkpf-mjahr
71                                          barcode.
72
73   MOVE-CORRESPONDING xmkpf TO emkpf.
74   CALL FUNCTION 'MB_MOVEMENTS_REFRESH'
75     EXCEPTIONS
76       error_message = 4.
77    MOVE-CORRESPONDING xmkpf TO emkpf.
ource Code Extract
ine SourceCde
32 *    BKPF as well. There is no other way to forward XBLNR to FI as not
33 *    every document is posted by MB_CREATE -> a new function module in
34 *    MBWL for transferring the information, called by FI, meant to load
35 *    the complete function group for all MBxx postings when this isn't
36 *    required (Performance). Would be the better way to transport the
37 *    information after switching off MBxx in later release.
38 *    corresponding IMPORT ... FROM MEMORY ... can be found in
39 *    AC_DOCUMENT_POST (FORM FI_DOCUMENT_PREPARE (LFACIF5D))
40      l_mem_id = 'MKPF-XBLNR'.                                   " 641365
41      EXPORT xblnr = xblnr_sd TO MEMORY ID l_mem_id.             " 641365
42    ELSE.                                                        "1245374
43      l_mem_id = 'MKPF-XBLNR'.                                   "1245374
44      FREE MEMORY ID l_mem_id.                                   "1245374
45    ENDIF.

Couple of notes are mentioned (385830, 780365 etc) and check whether these notes are applied. If so, check with the ABAPer and go through the source code corrections explained in the respective notes.
You may also go through the following notes
1) Note 386656 - FBV4: RW103 'System error in the FI/CO interface'
2) Note 388316 - RW103 "System error in the FI/CO interface"
3) Note 543463 - Inconsistent Posting in budgetary ledger and/or RW102/RW103
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

POST GOODS ISSUE AGAINST RESERVATIONS

Dear All,
I want to restrict the goods issue against the manual reservations.
Logic:At the time of goods issue against the reservation system should check stock in hand(unrestricted stock)-all previous reservations.
Eg:suppose unrestricted stock is 50kg
Reservation 1 for 20 kg
Reservation 2 for 30 kg
Reservation 3 for 40 kg
Reservation 4 for 10 kg
When i do goods issue for Res :3
System should check Uns Stock(50kg)-Previous Res(20kg+30kg)
give error message stock insufficient.
Waiting for the expert comment.
Kind Regards,
Sankar T

Hi
   Let me tell you with that logic reservation works.
While creating manual reservation, system checks whether material is available on specified date or not. In case material is available then system will allow to reserve the material otherwise not.
    Now take your case, if you have made following reservations
1) 20 Kg
2) 30 Kg
3) 40 Kg
4) 10 Kg
This means against each reservation material will always be available for particular reservation (because no one can issue particular material by any other means)
Now suppose in unrestricted use 50 kg of material is available and you want to issue the material against reservation No 3 then system will issue material from reserved material (Not from the un restricted use)
   This means the logic which you want to use is already applied by SAP in one step before (while creating reservation) so need not to apply same logic once again.
   and if you still want to use this logic , you take a help of ABAPer , he only can help you in this mater
Reward if helpful

GOODS ISSUE AGAINST GRN NO.

Hello
Can we do Goods Issue against the GRN No. ???
Regards
Jay
Moderator message: locked because of violating forum rules - please read the rules before posting. Subject must not be in capital letters only
Edited by: Jürgen L. on Feb 22, 2012 3:31 PM

Hi,
No you can not do a goods issue against a GRN.
Goods iisue will be done against a account assignment like order, cost center, scrap, delivery etc .
Regards,

Good issue against pick list

Hi,
I have requirement to track the goods issued to production with reference to the order/pick list. The goods are moved from warehouse to production location using 313 mvt and received at production storage location using 315, Once the consumption recordings are completed and any stock remaining at the production storage location, we need to identify against which order this stock belongs to. WM is implemented for the main store but production store is not part of the WM.
Regards
Cheru

Hi Jatin,
The requirement is to move the stock from main warehouse to the production store. We want to issue the goods against the pick list from main warehouse to production store. The ware house will do the goods issue against the pick list and the production will receive the goods at their storage location. So we could track what goods issued against which pick list. Once the goods are at the production location, consumption will recording will be done against the production order. We do not want to do the goods issue against pick list from the warehouse using mvt 261.
Regards
Cheru

Account Detrmination for Goods Issue against Order

Dear All,
We have a requirement where goods issued against reservation created through plant maintenance order should hit repairs & maintenance account instead of default account such as consumption stores and spares.
Can any changes be made in configuration so that the default account can be changed either while saving plant maintenance order or can the default be overwritten when material is issued through MB1A against reservation.
Useful answers will be rewarded with points
Regards
Milind Nair

Dear
Your knowldge iam adding the points
In materail master check the Valuation class 4 digits (ex: 2010)
is assigned in material master . The same material will be used in many places , this valaution class depends Production created by Fi.
This same will have assigned in G/L at OBYC t code. Here we assign as automatic posting. The same G/l account has given as automatic posting in G/L t code FS00.
In obyc has many process example for goods issue it will come as BSX. costing difference PRD.
your materails type is ERSA these types may bes used many plcaes other than Pm . If clinet interests you can assign valuation class with seperate G/l account for PM
All the G/L , costing docuemnts will appear while doing migo (mb1a) 261 movements as per your obyc seetings
Tell requirements with FI/MM

Cost center for Production Order

Hi all,
We are now not able to get a report of Material consumption cost, Cost center wise. It is Because cost center is not linked to Production order or not linked to material issued to production order. Can we get the cost of material cosumption for production order cost center wise. Please give us a solution.
With Regards,
R.Mahendiran.

Hi,
Prod order is linked with controlling, for the direct costs like material cost linked with accounting view, costing view and secondary costs are linked with costing tab in work center and inturn workcenter is assigned to cost center, and for the prod order controlling part you will be assigned to the costing variant in transaction OPL8, if you remove this you can't get any reports.
To understand the difference
201 - Goods issue against cost center. Means you create reservation through MB21 and do posting of cost directly at cost center.
261 - Goods issue to Production order. Means you create a reservation through Production order and do posting of cost to Production order. When cost settlement of production order is done cost from production order will get transfered to cost center mentioned in settlement rule of production order.
Hope this clarifies your doubt.

Direct GRN (non order items) to cost center for Non Stackable Materials

Hi All,
We can do direct GRN (non order items) to cost center for Non Stackable Materials.
If it is possible.Please advice me
Thanks In adance

Hi,
Your question is not clear.
Ok.
If you want to issue goods to cost center you can use 201 movement type.
If you want do create automatic PO in back ground during goods receipt, you can do it with customization. For automatic PO creation during goods receipt, you can search in SDN, you can get the answer.
Regards,
Biju K

Cost center not picked up in the APC posting for Asset

Hi,
The account assignment object KOSTL is active in system, with the below settings.
and below is the transaction type specific settings.
in the posting key and the GL accounts Field status groups, the cost center is optional and activity type is also optional.
In Asset master the cost center is maintained.
But while doing the Asset Acquisition postin the cost center is not updated in the document.
It was expected that the cost center will be derived from asset master and would have reflected in the 1st line item.
Please help me understand, if some other configuration has to be looked at for this perticular issue,
Regards
Rudra

Hi Ganesh / Rudra
CC in Asset Postings has a purpose
Since no Profit Center is directly maintainable in Asset Master atleast until EhP4 or 5, the PC in Asset APC line item was derived through the Cost Center or Internal Order maintained in Asset master
For that reason, your asset APC account must be created as Cost element, even though it is a Balance sheet account.. The cost element category will be automatically 90 - Statistical Cost element
Check if the APC account is made as Cost element or not.. That would be the reason most probably
Hope it is clear
Br. Ajay M
PS :- I heard that from EHP5 or 6 PC can be directly maintained in Asset Master.. I have not seen it yet, so i cant comment on it

Validation for Cost center for Goods issue against the cost centers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for