Validation for WHT code

Friends,
i want stop using of one With Holding tax Code in income type 194J in Country IN.how can i give the validation for this.
Thank u in Advance,
Satyam

Hi,
Try with GL Accounts used for section code 194j, but i am not sure, whether validations work for Automatically generated line items.
Otherwise, try to block the gl accounts for posting, which are used for 194j
Otherwise try to remove the assignment of tax types(related to 194j) to company codes.
I am giving my assumptions only, try to work on the alternatives specified above.
all the best
Prasad

Similar Messages

Validation for tax code not to use

Dear Gurus,
i had done validation for purchase/sales tax code not use while doing transction.
Prerequisite
BKPF-BUKRS =1000
CHECK
NOT BESEG-MESKZ IN ZTAXCODE
Message
you can't use this tax code
i had done this validation for parent company code(1000) but it is giving error for our subsidiary company(3000), though the tax procedure is differnet for both the company taxinj(india) and taxusj(usa). Also the end user is making transction in company code 3000 without tax code still system give him error.
Please advice how to rectify it.
Regards,
Rajesh K

Hi,
As per my understanding the Tax Code is same but the Tax Procedures are different for the two Company Codes. The solution is to add Company Code 3000 also in the validation Prerequisite. With this it could work.
Regards,
Kiron Kumar T.

Validation for T-code FB50

Hi, I need to validate the user input for T-Code FB50 at the line item.
I've implement the validation rule and created a user exit. However, the validation rule cannot validate the data line by line at the item table because the value BSEG and COBL that pass in are wierd.
How can I validate the input line by line? What should I pass into the user exit (the screen table name?)?

Hello sam
Please check this Exit EXIT_RFEPOS00_001 whick takes table name as parameter. In this you find zinclude where you can place your coding logic .
~hitesh

Validation for T-code fv60

Hiii experts... i m configuring a validation for fv60.. as the service tax is calculated through automatic posting..now there for example 3 line item created when we simulate ... but when the user enters Cost Center/BA/ Profit center manually and tries to park the document.. it doesnt park....but after validation ... its now saving the the Cost Center/BA/ Profit center.. please guide.. i have just entered the check for business area for now... as there are many cost centers and many profit centers .. soo confused how to do that .. please guide .. attaching a screenshot of validation
Regards,
Abhay

hey tejas.. thanks for the reply... giving you the screenshots of the the stuff and the error.. the last screenshot is the screenshot after user enters BA/PC/CC maually

Validation for Company code for a vendor in LFB1 TABLE.

Hi Experts,
New to ABAP Objects!! I need to write a method which will have two input parameters Vendor number and company code. and i have check wether company code exist for given vendor number.
Can any one send the code for the above validation.
Thanks in advance for your help.
-Chris.

Hello Chris
I have checked on ERP 6.0 and there is no standard class available for checking vendors.
However, within your method simply call BAPI_VENDOR_EXISTENCECHECK.
If the vendor exists but not for the company code the BAPI returns the message E522(FN):
Vendor &1 exists, but is not created in company code &2
You may have a look at classes beginning with CL_REEX..., e.g.:
CL_REEXC_COMPANY_CODE Company Code (T001)
CL_REEXC_CONTROLLING_AREA Controlling Area (TKA01)
Regards
Uwe

How to validity extended for comp code to gl

MY user is asking extended the validity for company code to gl how to do this any one can please explain me
user needs the validity extended for comp code 0005
gl acc no- 768907
which t code i can use

Hi Nagendra,
Is there any error or screenshot? Because when the company code is created, there isn't date to expire.
In the CO component you have a validity for a cost center but not for company code in the FI-GL.
JPA

WHT Code with Tax Slabs

Dear All,
I need to configure a tax code in the system as per following three conditions:
No..Condition...................................... .Rate
1...Gross Amount (GA) <= 150,000........0%
2...GA > 150,000 and GA < 400,000.......5%
3...GA > 400,000 and GA < 1,000,000...12,500 + 10%
I have seen formulas section in the WHT Code Configuration in SPRO but there is no way to define this constant amount of 12,500.
Please provide a suggestion how to add this amount to the calculated tax amount?
Regards,
Anosh

I buy your point.
I will create WHT Type for WHT Code - Individual and WHT Code - Others.
But still there will be an issue since WHT Code will be different Non PAN and With PAN (within Individual). So still this will be an issue.
How to control this now.
=
Meena

Code is only valid for users of store

Help....
Ive just gifted an app to my son as I often do and when he tries to redeem it it says "This code is only valid for customers of the Store".
Ive looked this up and normally it will involve someone from one country trying to gift an app to someone in another country but with me this is not the case.
My son lives in the same country, the same address everything.
The app was called Kick the buddy: Second kick
Can anyone please help
Thank you

Thanks to James, I have just had a reply saying that they do not know why this error has occured but they have refunded my purchase costs.
Good luck to anyone who has the same problem

"This code is only Valid for customers of the USA Store.", "This code is only Valid for customers of the USA Store."

I get this error message when redeeming an app from the apple "Aproved" website "Appexchanger" which is when you check out free apps and get credits to get paid apps, but i am in canada and everytime i go to redeem one i get "This code is only valid for customers of the USA Store." i think this is unfair because ive done what theve asked and theres nothing on the site that says "US ONLY" and the people who made it wont even contact me back! Please help i just want some apps!

Just FYI, Appexchanger is not "approved" by Apple in any way that I can detect. Apple does not appear to have any connection of any sort with that company other than as a customer.
This company looks to me to be nothing more than a way to harvest email addresses and other content information to sell to other companies, getting you onto all sorts of spam lists. I don't for one minute believe their claim that they won't sell your information (and if they don't, it's s good bet at least one if nor more of the developers will). But in any case, as Jay said, any problems or issues you may have with that company will have to be taken up with them. This is not an Apple issue.
Regards.

Validation for creating check in T-code FCH5

Hi All,
I have created payment docuemnt t-code F-48.
Then for creating check in T-code FCH5, system allows me to assign different House Bank and Account ID.
How can this be controlled through validation, kindly guide on creating validation for the same.
Thanks

Hi,
In FS00 for bank gl accounts give house bank and account id. By giving this the problem will be solved.
and also check
In OBVCU for bank accounts check combination of house bank,payment method,currency,accoun id and bank subaccount.
Hope it solve your problem
Regards,
Sankar

Validations for FB70, FB75 and FB60, MIRO without Tax Codes

Hi,
can u help on the below issue.
I want to restrict the users while posting(FB70, FB75 and FB60, MIRO) without tax codes, please provide Validations for the same.
Block AR/AP for postings without tax code - AR is FB70 and FB75 - AP is FB 60 and MIRO
Thanks&regards,
Rajesh

Hi,
Please check below validations for FB60 AND MIRO ,FB70 AND FB75
Prerequisite
BKPF-BUKRS = 'xxxx' AND SYST-TCODE = 'FB60'
OR SYST-TCODE = 'FB75' OR SYST-TCODE = 'FB70'
OR SYST-TCODE = 'MIRO'
Check
BSEG-MWSKZ
Please check ,
NARESH

WHT - Number Group not maintained for co code 1000 S.code IEQ 5400

WHT experts
I got the error when I create Remittance challan (J1INCHLN) that
Number group not maintained for co code 1000 section code IEQ 5400 and Business place 194H
I have defined Number group for Challan though I got above error
This is in Prdn system. So pl give me solution asap.

Hi,
Assign number number ranges to section code and business place wise and attach business place and section code. go to sm30 and specify manually
J_1IEWTNUMGR_1     Number Groups For Internal Challan Numbers-EWT India:SECCO
J_1IEWTNUMGR_N     Number Groups For Internal Challan Numbers-EWT India:SECCO
J_1IEWT_CERTNO     Number Ranges for Withholding Tax Certificates
go ahead with this path Spro-sap img-financial accounting-fa global settings-withholding tax-extended withholding tax-basic settings-south korea-define section codes.
hope this is clear, if yes assign points any problem revert me back
Regards,
Sankar

Tax code should be valid for A/P error

Hello,
I have created a new company and setup all the master data and G/L determination information. The account payable is also set for the vendor. On the line item the tax code has the A/P account set. When I try to add a new purchase order I get an error "Tax code should be valid for A/P[Purchase Order - Rows - Tax Code]"
How can I fix this?
Thanks & Regards,
Sheetal

TaxCode object in the DIAPI has a property called "ValidForAP". It was set to "N" hence the error. The warehouseinfo had this taxcode set and when the item was added to the purchase order the same tax code got set automatically. Hence the add on Purchase order would fail with the message.
Regards,
Sheetal

Validation for FBCJ transaction for section code

hi
i am trying to create validation for cash documents posted through FBCJ transaction . by using ob29 transaction i have created validation it is working fine when i am posting entry f-02 but not validating documents which posted through FBCJ .
why documents are ignored when i am posting through FBCJ . is there any deferent way to validate documents posted through FBCJ ?
prerequisite :- based on company code
check :- based on section code ' ' (blank)
message :- just information msg
thanks in advance
sachin

hi
i am trying to tally the balances for AR03 with f.01 but i am unable to match it . now what difference i am getting i am not able to trace it back .because when i uploaded assets that time some difference was there because of some assets value and postings .
now through ar03 i am getting dieffrent gross values,accumulated depreciation , wip , net values .
is it possible to match both transaction balance ?
so if i have to match the balances for both the transactions what point i have to consider and which area i have to focus ,
in asset closing procedure which trace points are available .
like f.01 balance in fixed , now i can change in asset area only
thanks in advance
sachin

1099 misc file format not able to get for multiple WHT code??

Dear Experts,
I am trying to download the file format for 1099 misc IRS reporting for e-filling, i am getting the file for one WHT code 07. but when i am executing this transaction S_P00_07000134 for multiple WHT Code 01 to 14, in the file format, Amount entries are available for all the WHT Code but In the Record "A" only Account code "C" is coming. i have implemented the SAP Note 1666672 version 3 before executing this transaction. Please let me know this is a configuration issue or i am missing to apply other SAP Note. this is very high priority issue now.
Any comments on this are highly appreciated.
Thanks in Advance
Saurabh Saxena

I am seeing the same issue. This worked for us last year. But this year the A Record indicates that we only have Withholding code 7, yet our detail records have withholding amounts in columns 1, 6, and 7.
IRS rules state that multiple withholding codes should be concatenated in ascending order in the Header 'A'Record. This must be an issue with the 2011 DMEE file, IDWTFILE_US_1099.xml as this is the only thing that changed in the 2011 note.
Actually, I've just compared last year's IDWTFILE_US_1099.xml file with this year's, and in the part of the transformation where the withholding amount codes are concatenated, it appears a bug was introduced. I'm going to hand-edit my copy of the file to see if it resolves the issue, and I'll cross my fingers that SAP produces a 4th update to note 1666672
Edited by: Timothy Conama on Jan 19, 2012 1:45 AM

Validation for WHT code

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for