Validation in CK40N or CK22

Hi guyz,
Is it possible in put validation for costing version in the t-code CK40N and CK22?
Or
Anybody aware of any user exit for the same?

Hi,
please use  <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/e7/653749d2d211d29e430000e839cd96/frameset.htm">open FI</a> (transaction FIBF and process 1860)
regards Andreas

Similar Messages

  • CK40N

    Hello Gurus-
    I have a question in regards to CK40N. In our standard procedure we update freight percentages and then do a mass cost roll. The system then picks up these percentages and updates all the materials. But lets say we have not made any purchases this year, and still have some materials in stock which were purchased two years ago. In this situation also during the mass cost roll the system updates with new freight percentages which is a problem as auditors are coming back to us saying we cannot do that. If we havenu2019t purchased anything this year, the freight percentages shouldnu2019t be updated. Also, we have a custom program which checks for the last invoice price. This way we can get a list of all the materials that we did not purchase this year. But, we might end up with a list of some 60 u2013 90K materials which might not have a purchase price this year and during our mass cost roll these materials should not up updated with freight. Is there a possibility that these materials be excluded in the selection criteria during the mass cost roll using ck40n? would the system allow to exclude these many material numbers (60-90k)?
    Does any other company has an issue like this and if so how are they dealing?
    Any help in this regard is highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    RNarayan

    Hi Vijay-
    Yeah, that is the problem. We use standard price for raw materials. Now we are in a situation where we cannot change the price control from standard to moving average. We have maintained origin groups which are maintained in the material master. And maybe once a year we change the freight percentages which are linked to origin groups in costing sheet. So, every time we do a cost roll all the materials get updated with new freight percentages and auditors have been haunting us on that. If there is no purchase done this year, and if there are purchases made in earlier years according them is they should not be valued at current freight percentages (which is a valid point), but how to handle in SAP is an issue. Also, if I have like 100 units in stock and 50 were purchased in 2006 and another 50 are purchased in 2007, another problem is both the years they have different freight percentages and should be valued differently...which I donu2019t have a clue how to segregate.
    Also, when you said you use MAP for raw materials how does it handle freight? I mean, can you help me understand the process.
    Thanks for you input.
    RNarayan

  • CK40N - Still open even after applying the note

    Hello Everyone!
    Greetings!
    Experiencing issues in the costing run. SAP ECC 5.0
    After the marking job completion observed that there are some u2018Still Openu2019 items. After some research found the SAP notes u2013 0000542790, 0001321242 & 0001402978.
    SAP note 0000542790 is not applicable to us as the client is on SAP ECC 5.0. For the short term fix, as per the note 542790 have executed the command u2018=cksuu2019. It worked.
    To apply the notes 0001321242, 0001402978 was testing in the test systems and I still see the u2018STILL OPENu2019 items even after implementing the SAP notes 0001321242 and 0001402978. Both the notes have been sucessfully implemented and also verified the corrections.
    Any suggestions/advice, please. Thanks in advance !
    Satish

    Hi Satish,
    There can be valid reasons for the 'still open' Materials.
    The following are reasons for 'still open'
    1. the materials were included in another costing run so there was an
    overlap in released cost estimates
    2. there was already a released cost estimate for those materials so
    the system did not allow for another one - this could have been costed
    manually and released manually (ck11) rather than in ck40n
    3. there was a stop in the job that ran to release them (you mentioned
    periods were closed). After the restart, some of the statistics could
    have been incorrectly updated.
    Furthermore, please see the note:
    542790     Inconsistency correction: Costing run statistics
    If need need to find the 'still open' Materials.
    If you run tCode 'SE16' and view the table table KALM which contains
    the entries for all materials costed within the costing run.
    Field 'KALM-FEH_STATUS is the cost estimate's status after step costing.
    1) Find cost estimates created originally within cstg run
    So, you have to select all entries of KALM for the specific costing
    run which are having KALM-FEH_STATUS = 'KA'.
    This is the number of cost estimates which should have been marked in
    the later marking step.
    2) Find cost estimates released successfully
    The set of released cost estimates is given by selection of table
    KEKO: specify KALAID and KALADAT and FEH_STA = 'FR'.
    3) Find missing cost estimates
    Compare the results of 1) and 2):
    Which material/plant have an KALM entry, but not a released cost
    cost estimate ?
      > this will be the set of cost estimates you are looking for...
    Regards,Declan

  • C2 223 A valid bill of material could not be found for material 5089

    Hi Experts
    I have Production orders that use a phantom material 63955 with Std costing control.  This material uses three materials (5089,5233 & 5235) of moving average control.
    Material 63955 is a HALB and uses all the numbers 5089,5233 and 5235 which are ROH.
    With costing material 63955 with CK11N or CK40N, the error is
    C2223 A valid bill of material could not be found for material 5089 and the same for 5233 and 5235
    Diagnosis
    Material 5233 is marked as a phantom assembly. When the system tried to explode a valid bill of material for material 5233, it could not find one.
    System Response
    The system generates a normal reservation for 5233.
    Procedure
    Check the bill of material for material 5233
    The 5* numbers do not have a bill of material and are purchased externally.
    What must I do now please?  These materials cannot be costed.
    Kind regards
    Dawn

    Hi..
    You  check whether material 5233 have procurement type ‘E’ or ‘X’ and
    special procurement type ‘50’ in MRP2 view of Material master.
    Material 5233 with the above conditions is Phantom assembly.
    If Material 5233 is material master for external purchasing, Material 5233
    should have procurement type ‘F’ and special procurement type  space.

  • Costing run: std validation contingent upon selection?

    (This is a repost to the correct forum)
    Gents hi,
    I always thought the parts that will have their std changed (validated) though a costing run (then CQ24) would have to be selected in the costing run. Here seems to be a situation where the raw material are to have their std changed, even if the only parts selected in the costing run are the HALB and FERT.
    Is that a surprise to you?
    Thanks for your time
    KR-Loï

    Hi
    If you run the cost estimate from CK40N - It releases the Cost for all materials involved i.e. FERT / HALB/ Raw mats etc
    however, if you run cost estimate from CK11N & CK24 - It would release only for the material for which cost estimate is run
    In Ck40N - you can stop the system from releasing cost for raw mats... In the Step SELECTION of Ck40N - You specify the Plant / Mats....
    Using the Multiple Selection option for MATERIALS, you can specify a range of mats in the Exclusion list.. These will not be costed then....
    br, Ajay M

  • Several costing runs (CK40N)

    Hi Gurus!
    I´ve got a question about CK40N/CK11N. If we have two standard cost estimates for one material with different result:
    COST1 valid from 12.12 til 31.12 --> cost for material XXX 1.000
    COST2 valid from 13.12 til 31.12 ---> cost fom material XXX 1.020
    If we want to mark and release the price of the material XXX, what price will be marked/released?
    Other question: Navigating to the Analisis Result of cost estimate COST1 we get the result of this cost estimate COST1: 1.000, but, if we click on the material to navigate to the detail, we see the costs from the other cost estimate (COST2), 1.020!!! How is this possible?
    Thanks!!

    Standard is last cost run will pick for Mark and release at CK24
    However you can select at CK24 by clicking Other prices icon your costing variant/date/version.
    Srinivas

  • View data in client B from client A in the same SID without a valid logon?

    Hi Folks
    We are planning on upgrading our 4.6C system to ERP 6.0, and are initialy considering having two clients in the same sandbox SID.  One would be for the developers to perform code remediation checks (client A), and one would contain a copy of production data for performing testing of functionality over live data (client B).
    Would it be possible to view data in client B from client A in the same system without a valid logon to client B or RFC connection to client B from client A?   For example via the use on an ABAP program to SQL the database?
    I know one can use transactions like SM30/SM31 to view, compare, and adjust data between clients, but this requires an RFC connection and valid logon to the target client.
    Regards
    Kevin.

    Hi Kevin.
    >
    Kevin McLatchie wrote:
    > Would it be possible to view data in client B from client A in the same system without a valid logon to client B or RFC connection to client B from client A?   For example via the use on an ABAP program to
    Short answer: yes.
    If someone has the right to write and execute ABAP reports on the system he is able to access the data of all clients. So I don't think that this setup is advisable. Don't mix development and production data in one system.
    Best regards,
    Jan

  • DEVOLUÇÃO DE EXPORTAÇÃO - CFOP 3201 - GRC VALIDA DADOS DI.

    Boa tarde a todos!
    Estamos em um projeto de NFE XML 2.00 e nos deparamos com o seguinte erro:
    Ao emitirmos um NF-e de devolução da mercadoria que se encontrava no Porto (devolução de exportação - CFOP 3201), a validação do monitor GRC informa que é necessário constar os dados de importação, apesar deste processo não se tratar de importação. Os seguintes logs de validação são gerados:
    Erro de validação: campo Código do fabricante estrangeiro no sistema. Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_ADI-CFABRICANTE, ID campo I028)
    Erro de validação: campo Nº da adição. Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_ADI-NADICAO, ID campo I026)
    Erro de validação: campo Nº sequencial do artigo na adição. Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_ADI-NSEQADIC, ID campo I027)
    Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-CEXPORTADOR, ID campo I024)
    Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-DDESEMB, ID campo I023)
    Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-DDI, ID campo I020)
    Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-NDI, ID campo I019)
    Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-UFDESEMB, ID campo I022)
    Erro de validação: campo . Campo é obrigatório e não pode ficar em branco. (campo IT_NFE_IMP-XLOCDESEMB, ID campo I021)
    Estamos no SAPK-10015INSLLNFE e as seguintes notas relacionadas a validação estão aplicadas:
    1493980     Validation for field xJust in cancel and skipping messages
    1499921     Problem with validation after implementing SP15
    1500046     Upgrade validation rule for field ID for version 2.00
    1500742     Adjust validation for field NADICAO and NSEQADIC layout 2.00
    1502217     Extend validation rules for , layout 2
    1504379     Adjust validation for field X_CLISTSERV
    1511291     Update allowed values for field E1_CPAIS for validation
    1511577     Update validation rules for field VUNCOM_V20
    1520861     Update validation rules for OIL_CPRODANP and OIL_UFCONS
    Não encontrei nenhuma nota SAP recente para o componente SLL-NFE que seja relacionada a este problema.
    Desde já agradeço pela ajuda.
    Sds / Renato Penido.

    Boa tarde, Fernando,
    Obrigado pela pronta resposta.
    Debugamos a BADI e descobrimos que os dados de importação estão sendo gravado "em branco", gerando o erro de validação no GRC, tal qual dito por você.
    Aprimoramos a lógica da BADI para que a tag de importação não seja preenchida indevidamente para as notas de devolução do porto e as notas foram aprovadas.
    Muito obrigado,
    Renato Penido.

  • How do i open a web page with VeriSign Class 3 Extended Validation SSL SGC SS CA certfificate i can't open web pages with this, how do i open a web page with VeriSign Class 3 Extended Validation SSL SGC CA certfificate i can't open web pages with this

    how do i open a web page with VeriSign Class 3 Extended Validation SSL SGC SS CA ?

    Hi
    I am not suprised no one answered your questions, there are simply to many of them. Can I suggest you read the faq on 'how to get help quickly at - http://forums.adobe.com/thread/470404.
    Especially the section Don't which says -
    DON'T
    Don't post a series of questions in  a single post. Splitting them into separate threads increases your  chances of a quick answer.
    PZ
    www.pziecina.com

  • When i login it says my apple id is valid but its not an icloud id

    when I try to login i get a message telling me my apple id is valid but its not an icloud id .I dont have any apple mobile priducts so i have no idea what to do.Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

    You are getting this message because you are trying to create an iCloud account on a PC by signing with your Apple ID.  You can only sign into an existing account on a PC.  You first have to create iCloud account on an iOS device (iPhone, iPad or iPod Touch) running iOS 5 or higher, or on a Mac running OS X Lion (10.7.5) or higher.  After creating your account on one of these devices you will then be able to sign into the account using this ID on your PC.

  • HT204053 Dear Support Team, every time i tried to logon Icloud its gives me wrong user name or password and at the end it show me error " This Apple ID is valid but is not an ICloud Account" then how can i use one account for same Apple ID and ICloud???

    Dear Support Team,
    Every time i tried to logon Icloud its gives me wrong user name or password and at the end it show me error " This Apple ID is valid but is not an ICloud Account" then how can i use one account for same Apple ID and ICloud?
    Thanks

    It is not possible to create a new iCloud account using a Windows machine. You must create the account using a Mac (10.7.5 or more) or an IOS device (iPhone etc). Once that is done you can sign into and use the account on your Windows machine.

  • TS1368 When I try to make a purchase at the App Store or iBook Store or iTunes an error message tells me my account is not valid at the UK store. I live in Canada so how did I get to be connected to the UK and how can I get back to Canada?

    When I try to make a purchase at the App Store or iBook store or at iTunes an error message tells me my account is not valid for the UK store. I've no idea how I got connected there and I'd like help getting back to Canada where I live. Any suggestions?

    Change App Store
    1. Tap "Settings"
    2. Tap "iTunes & App Stores"
    3.Tap "View Apple ID"
    4. Enter your user name and password.
    5. Tap "Country/Region."
    6. Tap "Change Country/Region"
    7. Select the region where you are located.
    8. Tap "Done".

  • Creating Master to show only rows for which valid entries exist in Detai

    I have created a Master-Detail Form in my Apex application based off of views to tables in a private remote Database.
    In the Master-Detail Creation Wizard, at the "Link Master and Detail" page, I specified that the defined Primary Key in the Master Column should be equal to the corresponding Foreign Key in the Detail Column.
    My goal is to have my Master Form only display rows for which a valid corresponding entry exists in the Detail Form. Yet, the above setup returns all of the rows from the Master Table, even where the corresponding Detail entry is blank.
    Can you provide some light on what I'm doing wrong, and how I can accomplish what I want to do?
    Thank you!

    I have created a Master-Detail Form in my Apex application based off of views to tables in a private remote Database.
    In the Master-Detail Creation Wizard, at the "Link Master and Detail" page, I specified that the defined Primary Key in the Master Column should be equal to the corresponding Foreign Key in the Detail Column.
    My goal is to have my Master Form only display rows for which a valid corresponding entry exists in the Detail Form. Yet, the above setup returns all of the rows from the Master Table, even where the corresponding Detail entry is blank.
    Can you provide some light on what I'm doing wrong, and how I can accomplish what I want to do?
    Thank you!

  • Validating records into a maintenance view

    Hi folks!
    I have a simple Z table (say ZTABLE) and a Z view based on it with some related description (say ZVIEW).  The ZTABLE has a DEC field (called COEF) with 2 decimals and it should have only numbers between 0 and 1.
    I set the valid interval from 0 to 1 but, as help says, it's only checked for CHAR, NUMC, DEC, INT1, INT2 and INT4 data types.  Not for DEC.
    Then I use an event on ZVIEW.  On SE11 I went to "Table maintenance generator" - Environment - Modification - Events.  So there I put the 05 event (Creating a new entry) and I programed the check.  It works fine for new entries, but if you have a record on table and you want to change the COEF field you can put there any number, even outside the 0-1 range.
    I tried with the 01 event (Before saving the data in the database) but it seams to be called only for last record.
    Could anybody tell me what can I do?
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    Since it is a Z TABLE..
    You can directly modify the flow logic in SE51.
    Go to SE51
    Give the program name - SAPL + Function group name
    Screen number
    Press change..
    In the flow logic..
    Add a module after the FIELD ztable-number, in the PAI event..
    Ex..
    FIELD ZTABLE-NUMBER MODULE NUMBER_CHECK.
    And in the module validate the number..
    MODULE NUMBER_CHECK INPUT.
      IF ZTABLE-NUMBER <> '0' OR
          ZTABLE-NUMBER <> '1'.
         MESSAGE E208(00) WITH 'Not a valid number'.
      ENDIF.
    ENDMODULE.
    Thanks,
    Naren

  • Mandatory item validation at a page level?

    Hi,
    We have a page where the list of mandatory items changes according to how some 'key' items are set by the user e.g. if they select option 1 on item 1 we need a different set of mandatory fields than if they set option 2 - setting option 1 in item 4, may imply that some further items are mandatory, In addition, some items become mandatory due to circumstances known only on the database. We have in excess of 40 items on this page. Once all mandatory items are complete, the status of the page is saved as 'complete' - the user can always save the page as 'incomplete'.
    We already have a database package that can check a table row to see if it is 'complete', it knows all the circumstances for when an items becomes mandatory and can produce a list of fields and the reasons why they have failed validation.
    Is it possible to call this db package during page validation and use it to perform 'item' validations i.e. identify the invalid items and place the appropriate message inline with them?

    Hi,
    You can create a pl/sql page validation where you call you procedure.
    begin
    package_k.proc_p(item1,item2,...,itemN);
    end;
    You should define the type of the validation, but it is very straight forward,
    Regards,
    Max.

Maybe you are looking for