Validation require for different business area in MRO

Dear friends
System is allowing posting of different business area in Miro (Line item & Header item).For disallowing I have checked Validation, I think it is not usable.Please suggest me another solution.
regds
sachin

Hello,
You can use MRM_HEADER_CHECK bAdI for this validation.
or
You can use Enhancement (CMOD transaction) LMR1M001 -EXIT_SAPLMRMP_010 for this validation
Regards,
Burak

Similar Messages

  • GR/IR Automatic Clearing for Different Business areas items

    Hello All,
         we have different business areas, and some times we create a PO for all business areas and invoice it in a specific business area
    in F.13 automatic clearing:
    for GR/IR account
    Documents with different business area cannot be cleared.
    any idea to solve this issue is appreciated,

    Thanks for your reply,
    I've tried such a solution with more parameters ( EBELN, XREF3 and EBELP)
    but in F.13 :
    - the document cannot be cleared when >>> selecting GR/IR account special process.
    if we treat GR account as a normal GL account, I mean without selecting GR/IR account special process.
    the document can be clear
    i want to be able to clear the document with selecting GR/IR field ( is it possible )
    and if it is not allowed, do we will face a problem by clearing GR account without selecting GR/IR parameter ??
    Many Thanks

  • Different Business Area in Customer line item while Billing

    Dear Friends,
    We are on Ecc 6.0 and We have a requirement of Different Business Area in Customer line while billing. Since we had defined Business area location wise and requirement is Sundry Debtors should always book to Location as maintained in delivery plant field of sales area data in customer master.
    Requirement:- Our material is assigned to Plant 115.In customer master, sales area data -> shipping tab  -> Delivery Plant (KNVV- VWERKS), we are maintaining "112", Now while billing and while generating Accounting document account entry is
    Customer 1000.00 (Business area=115)
    sales    1000.00 (Business area=115)
    But our requirement while accounting document after billing is
    Customer 1000.00 (Business area=112), system should check and derive the same from TABLE KNVV - VWERKS(DEL PLANT)
    sales    1000.00 (Business area=115).
    Please revert.
    Regards,
    Sandeep

    Dear Friends,
    One can do the same via using a userexit.
    Regards,
    Sandeep

  • Number range based on different business area for same document type

    Hi All,
    The scenario is my client wants to give the different number range for a particular document type based on different business area.
    Is there any user exit by which I can restrict the same.
    Regards,
    Meenakshi

    Hello,
    Document number ranges are created per company code and fiscal year. You cannot create / restrict the document number ranges per business area.
    Business areas a independent of all organizational values, they cut across all company codes.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Document Splitting with Different Business Area

    HI
    I have a situation, where i need to create a new document type and it needs to be configured in such a way that vendor invoices and credit notes can be booked with the correct doc splitting and using different Business Areas.
    I like to know if this is possible, and if yes how.
    Earlier the client used to post the transactions, with different business areas, as we get only a warning message to reset the business area of the vendor.
    Now that we have activated New G/L accounting, with document splitting we get the warning message,
    but then the profit center will not balance, so we have an error.
    The client requires that they need to post to a different business area, and the document splitting should happen.
    Any suggestions on this will be great.

    Hi Srikanth,
    In my config setting under Document Splitting i have the Zero Balance ticked for it.
    My Scenario is as an Ex. I am debiting a G/L account for 1000, and giving Business Area X, with a cost Center which is assigned to Business Area X.
    And Crediting a Vendor for 1000 with Business Area Y.
    Will this scenario work with Document Splitting enabled, i am doubtful on this, but my client needs this.
    Can you tell me if this is a possible scnerio.
    If yes then how?

  • Multiple integration flows for different business operations

    Hi - I have following business requirement & need ur advice.
    There are different business operations (read as INSERT/DELETE/QUERY) to performed on same business object (read as CUSTOMER). In order to develop these integration use case I can have following three approaches.
    *1. Single Requestor ABCS & Single Provider ABCS -* Develop single integration flow & implement logic for the business operations in them. That means, Develop single Requestor ABCS for all business operations, which will call the EBS and again EBS would call same Provider ABCS. Both Requestor & Provider ABCS would implement business logic for all business operations required.
    *2. Single Requestor ABCS & Multiple Provider ABCS -* In this case the flows for all business operations starts with single point service. That means, Develop single Requestor ABCS for all business operations, which will call the EBS and again EBS would call different Provider ABCS based on the business operations. The Requestor ABCS would implement business logic for all business operations required. There would be different ABCS service for different business operations.
    *3. Multiple Requestor ABCS & Multiple Provider ABCS -* In this case the completely independent flows are to be developed for all business operations. Independent Requestor ABCS and independent Provider ABCS. Off course if there some common business logic for all or some business operations, those can be implemented as common service & can used across all independent flows for different business operations.
    Please do suggest what approach would be best one to pick up. Or it is case to case basis. In case yes, please suggest the criteria on which the decision can be taken.
    Thanks In Advance
    Priyadarshi

    Hi Pryadarshi,
    AIA recommends having an ABCS for each Verb and Noun combination for a specific Business Process, i.e. CreateCustomerABCS and UpdateCustomerABCS. Therefore, #3 would be the preferred approach. This is to allow for maximum flexibility. However, you may have a process that demands to model the integration as #2.
    The decision would depend on how the participating application services are modeled and the granularity of individual service call. For example, a ProcessCustomer invocation at the source end may call CreateCustomer provider service.
    Regards
    Rohit

  • Creating Planned Independent Requirements for an MRP Area.

    Hi All,
    I am trying to enter Planned Independent Requirements for an MRP Area, with requirement type VSE and I get the following error;
    "Only stock requirements are allowed when planning at MRP area level".
    I can enter at the Plant level with no problems.
    Any guidance is greatly appreciated.
    Kevin.

    The following is the excerpt from SAP [Help|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/81/470a58ddab11d1b55b0000e82de178/frameset.htm] I think you maintained a planning strategy in the MRP view (for the plant) which doesn't support VSE.
    You can delete PIRs from an MRP area by deleting the MRP area number from the Creating Planned Independent Requirements screen and recompiling.
    When you define the planning strategies and parameters in the material master, these parameters apply to the whole plant, including all the MRP areas within the plant: You cannot maintain the MRP areas separately.
    The integration of the MRP area and the assignment of the MRP area in the sales order is supported only by a user exit in the sales and distribution user exit pool.
    Sales orders with MRP areas are created irrespective of the availability check control group in the material master.
    Customer order processing of production sales orders with the item category (account assignment Step E Single) is only maintained in the MRP area of the plant.
    In Customizing and in the MRP area user exit, make sure that when transferring individual sales orders, only requirements types KE, KEK, KEKS, KET, KELV, KEV, KEVV, VSEF, and VSE are generated.
    The following requirements types are valid for the MRP area: KE, KEK, KEKS, KET, KELV, KEV, KEVV, VSEF, and VSE.
    You cannot plan with preliminary planning materials in the MRP area.
    There is no planning strategy for the material segment of the MRP area.
    The planning strategy for the material master segment of the plant is assigned to the material segment of the MRP area.
    The consumption mode and the periods of adjustment are derived from the plant in the MRP area of the material master.
    Only consumption customer requirements with planned independent requirements are allowed: VSF requirements with KSV and VSFB with KSV.

  • Proper use of one table in different business areas

    Hi
    We will be using certain DB tables in several business areas and we are more than one person to define them.
    If a table is loaded from the database for each of the business areas it will be numbered 'table 1, 2...' which does't seem very desirable. Also I'd rather define hiearchies only once and for all.
    If a table is loaded only once and used for all the business areas all the joins which are necessary in the different business areas are shown. This will be confusing. If one of us considers a certain join unnecessary he might accidentially delete the wrong one belonging to a different business area.
    Exporting the business areas including the joins regularly is probably not a great help if afterwards new joins for other business areas were added.(?)
    Am I misunderstanding the concept of Discoverer?
    How do you handle such a situation?
    Advice appreciated
    Franziska

    Hi Michael, et al,
    I'm just planning my EUL and your comments in the last post seem relevant.
    My general plan is as follows:
    (1) Create a BaseMaster BA which is used to bring and tables/views from the database into disco. The folders in here will be created with "New Folder from database" and be fairly straightforward, with only very simple calculations and no aggregations in calculations. The joins will echo the joins in the underlying database. This is not shared with Users.
    (2) Create a CustomMaster BA which contains Custom Folders which consist of various SQL views of the database. The SQL in these may use have some more complex calculations and these calculations may include aggregation. This will not be shared with users.
    (3) Create a CentralMaster BA which contains Complex Folders which are assembled from items from the BaseMaster BA and the CustomMaster BA. These folders may include more complex calculations and the calculations may include aggregated items.
    (4) Create a number of User BA's. Using Manage Folders, share the relevant Folders from the Central Master.
    I've got a few questions relating to this.
    (a) Custom Folders based on Folders
    It would seem nice to me if it were possible to create Custom Folders which were based on other Folders, rather than Database Views. Then, even if you need a view and a complex transformation of that view in your business area, you still only have one place where the EUL brings that view into disco. My understanding is that this is not possible. Am I right? I suppose there could be an argument that complex transformations should be pushed back to the DBA but it seems reasonable to me that sometimes this sort of thing could be within the remit of the disco admin?
    (b) SQL Efficiency
    Am I right in thinking that generally a complex folder is usually not much less efficient than using a base folder because the SQL interpreter ends up optimising the SQL?
    And a last question which has turned out rather complex - by all means ignore it if you like - it's me getting to grips with the process.
    (c) Nested Complex Folders
    I presume that if a transformation is needed which would in a normal database environment would need a mainquery and a subquery, then this could be done in a
    number of ways (adhering to the above methodology) by:
    (i) Get the DBA to write a view which does both mainquery and subquery and then bring into the BaseMaster and then straight into the CentralMaster folder.
    (ii) Get the DBA to write the subquery, bring this into the BaseMaster and then implement the mainquery in the CentralMaster.
    (iii) Create a Folder in CustomMaster which implements both mainquery and subquery and then bring this into the CentralMaster folder.
    (iv) Create a Folder in the CustomMaster which implements just the subquery and then implement the main query in the Central Master.
    If you've got this far - thankyou for baring with me.
    Perhaps there's something written about this sort of thing or maybe it's just a matter of practice!
    Any thoughts on all this would be much appreciated.
    Kind regards
    Suhada

  • Reservation of Stock for different business processes

    Hi
    We have a scenario  like two types of sales processes are there
    1. Direct Sales
    2. E-sales
    From Plant-A  both sales will happen, but while creating sales order for   direct sales 70% of the plant capacity  and E-sales 30% of the plant capacity.
    plant capacity we are mapping with planned orders
    how can we acheve this.
    reagrds
    rajendra

    I doubt that Reservation of Stock is possible for different business processes. Based on Sales Orders, the stock will be consumed.
    Regards,
    Rajesh Banka

  • Same folders in different business areas

    Hi,
    Is it possible to access folders across business areas?
    I was not able to do the above so I created (New folder from database) the same folder into 2 different business areas. But I cannot have the same names. Why? I see some folders created previously with the same names in both the business areas. Is there some other way?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hello everyone
    Business area names, folder names, and join names are unique across the system. It is possible to have the same folder in multiple business areas and this is not uncommon. It is also possible to reference the same object using multiple folders, making sure the identifier and folder names are unique.
    If you have a folder that you want to duplicate, rather than share between business areas, you can highlight the folder in one area, copy it using CTRL-C, and the using CTRL-V paste it into the other area. Doing this gives you a copy of the folder pointing at the same underlying object. This is useful if you want to reference the same object several times, say for aliasing purposes or for ease of querying. I do this all the time when working with fiscal time folders and it works like a dream.
    Hope this helps
    Regards
    Michael

  • Different Asset value dates for different depreciation areas

    Hi All
    I have a requirement for different capitalization dates in different depreciation areas for some LATAM countries .How can this be achieved?

    Hi
    Hope you can achive this requirement by entering Depreciation calculation start date in depreciation area tab of asset master against each depreciation area
    Depreciation calculation start date
    'As a general rule, the system determines the depreciation start date from the asset value date of the first acquisition posting. However, you can also manually enter a calendar date in the asset master record for the start of depreciation. In that case, the system ignores the asset value date of the acquisition posting.'
    Please check different scenarios in development system and then do it
    Regards
    Praveen PC

  • Single Cheque for Multiple Business Area

    Hi Experts
    How can I print one cheque for multiple business area with the option of printing different cheques still remaining?
    Thanks
    Nadia

    Hi Nadia.....If Iam not mistaken you DONOT want to make Separate Payments for each Business Area.
    In such a case donot select the checkbox Separate Payments for Business Area -FBZP--Paying Company code customisation.
    If this indicator is set, line items from different business areas are paid separately.
    Hope Iam clear about this.
    Please assign points if helpful
    Regards
    Aravind

  • Depreciation run for each business area

    Hi all,
    In case all business areas are belong to 1 company code.
    So how to run depreciation for each business area separately?
    I mean business area A can run depreciation for itself, and not affect other business areas in the same company code.
    Any suggestion would be highly appreciate!
    Thanks in advance any help!
    HuyenTT

    no, this is not possible, as the depreciation run needs to be executed for the whole company code.
    Blaz

  • Query to find all workbooks/worksheets for each business area

    Hi Experts,
    I need to find all workbooks/worksheets in each business area. Collect 'Query Statistics is checked for all the users'
    Also are there any documents or information available of the description of the discoverer metadata database tables which will help in writing queries
    thanks and regards,
    John

    There is no workbook/worksheet linkage to a business area. So you cannot search for a business area and find all the workbooks "attached" to that business area. The attachment of workbooks is at the folder level. It is actually possible, if you are sharing folders among business areas, to create a workbook with data from 2 or more business areas. I have tested that and it is indeed possible. In Discoverer Administrator you can check on folder dependencies to see what workbooks use the folder. Though in my version of Discoverer, there is a problem with Discoverer Plus, such that the workbook save in Plus is not creating this dependency information like it should. At least I have not found any way to take a business area and determine what workbooks would fall under it. Maybe someone else has found a way.
    John Dickey

  • Different number range for different  sales area but same order type

    i have 2 different sales area but i have assigned same sales order type for 2 different sales area,
    but i need the number range different for different sales area for that same sales doc type,
    is that there is any user exists for number range? if so how can i find the user exists

    Hi,
    You can surely have a different number range per Sales Area. For this you will have to make use of a User Exit (which would surpass the standard SAP functionality). Try USEREXIT_NUMBER_RANGE.
    Maintain the desired range in VN01 with the respective Range Keys.
    Make a custom table comprising of Sales Area and Number Range keys (same keys which you maintained in VN01).
    Now everytime, the system will check which sales area is used and accordingly, it will fetch the Number Range Key~Sales Area combination from the custom table, and will pick up the number range from VN01.
    Coding should done by a good technical guy to make this work nicely.
    Hope this helps you.
    Regards,
    Vivek

Maybe you are looking for