Validity date issue: Access Enforcer

Hi All,
There is a request in Access Enforcer wherein there are total 4 stages of approval, the first 2 stages have been properly approved however when the same arrived to the 3rd stage of approval, the validity date for the request was over and therefore the approvers tried to extend the same, but the "more" tab is not appearing and therefore the approvers are not able to approve the request by extensing the validity date.
Can you please help with this issue?
Thanks
Vani

Vani,
Go to the stage level settings for this particular stage via configuration -> workflow -> stage. Change the option of 'Change request content' to 'Yes' and the approver in this stage should be able to change the vailidity dates.
Regards,
Alpesh

Similar Messages

DMS Document Validity date issue.

Hello All,
I have an issue in DMS Valid from Date & Valid to date as below.
In our Document type when our document status is set to OB i.e. obsolete, in front of the status, system is showing two dates like 22.01.2014 to 31.12.9999.
We are not using change number functionality in this document type. But still system is showing two dates. When document is in RE i.e Release status system is showing 22.01.2104... date in front of the status.
Could you please let us know why it is showing two dates in front of document status.
Thanks

Hi,
from my point of view I can inform you that these dates are validity dates for the document. Normally these dates are filled when the document is released to show which version of the document is valid or was valid in a specific period.
By using menu "Extras" >> "Versions". Here a list of all versions should be displayed and the columns "Valid From" and "Valid to" should show the validity dates.
Normally these date values are only filled when the status has set the "release" flag in transaction DC10.
Best regards,
Christoph

Unable to create BOMMAT IDOCs due to validity date issue

Hello everyone, (Posted in SAP-PP forum as well)
I am having a unique issue with our Bills of Materials. After they are created and set to active, they have validity dates that go from 2001 to 9999. When I go to BD30 to distribute the BOM to the external systems I am getting the following error message:
No bill of material exists on 08/25/2009 for 2557B27H02/FBLR/1/01
Message no. BOM014
Diagnosis
You want to distribute BOM 2557B27H02/FBLR/1/01 via ALE. However, the BOM is invalid on 08/25/2009.
System Response
The system does not distribute the BOM.
Procedure
Check the BOM's validity.
If you want to distribute all BOMs with the change status for another key date, enter another valid-from date on the initial screen.
If you only want to distribute a certain BOM with the change status for another key date, enter another valid-from date or a change number on the selection screen.
We get this for any BOM in this system.
This is our QA environment and do not have this problem in our Development system. BD30 finds the BOM we specified but claims it is invalid on that date.
We are trying to figure out if there is another status or approval step that I am missing here.
SAP v4.7 level 19
Thanks and points awarded for helpful answers!
John

Hi John
Check you Material & Bill of Material in Table: MAST & STKO whether they are valid or not .. Check valid from date in Bill of material
Ramesh

User Data Source - Access Enforcer

Hi,
I currently have my User Details Data Source and Search Data Source in AE pointed to the UME. In the UME I have my requestors and approvers set up. However when I go to raise a request to change a user account and want to search for an SAP user, the search only returns the requestors and approvers set up in the UME and does not show user data from SAP. How can set up AE so that it shows me user data from SAP and requestor/approver data from the UME?
Thanks,
Gary

What you can do is... to point your UME to your SAP system, where you can find all users.....
And keep your configuration of AE the way you have it....
Another way is, to change your configuration of User Details Data Source pointing to SAP.
Youy User Details Data Source have to point to the system that have all the new users....
For example, in my company before giving the SAP access we give LDAP access, so my User Details Data Source are pointing to my LDAP system.... this way i can find easily the user that need to request access..
Hope this help.
Regards,

Factory calendar issue changing validity date

Hi,
We have come across the OSS note 1532398 and 1529649. It's for our Solution Manager system. We are on SP24 EHP1 and i wanted to know how far up can you go in the validity date? I understand the holiday dates need to be changed first but how far up can i go and which calendar would apply for Solution Manager? My understanding is that becuase we are based in the UK only the UK based calendars would need to be changed or does it depend on which country the user accessing the system is based?
your help would be very much appreciated.
Mani

Hello Mani,
If you look at SAP Note 501262 - UK Public Holiday Calendar Settings for 2012
Look at Solution 3
3. You can now -> Goto -> Public Holiday calendar -> Assign th
2013 holiday to the calendars GS/GN/GE.
Change valid from / to definition -> select 'Spring Bank
Holiday - 2013' -> valid from = 2013 -> Save
Valid from 2013 to 20XX on your demand
This would suggest that the validity date can be set to any value in the format 20xx.
Regards,
Paul

Access enforcer and User Data Source for HR

We are on Access Enforcer 5.2 - service pack 2:
My problem is that when creating a new request in AE, I able to get a list of all users when I point my User Data Source to either SAP or UME. However when I attempt to create a request whilst pointing the User Data Source at the SAPHR system, I do not get any users back (and we have user set up in the SAP HR system).
Ive changed the connector to YES under the HR System box, Ive changed the Data Source Type and Details Source Type to point at the SAPHR and still it fails to fetch any users.
I've tried looking at the log, but can't get much out of it.
I would appreciate it, if anyone could provide any assistance.
Thanks you in advance.
Amarjit
Message was edited by:
amarjit singh

Hi Micheal,
Thanks for your reply.
I'm pointing both Data Source Type and Details Source Type to the same system SAPHR and to the same system name (which is our dev system)
Regards,
Amarjit

GATP - Issue with substitution rules with validity dates

Hi,
We are using GATP with RBA. Our condition table has plant as a field.
We are planning to have a substitution procedure (rules) defined at plant level.
Our rule control for product substitution list is "Start from top of list"
The issue we are facing is explained below.
The first item in the substitution procedure (rule) cannot have validity dates.
So it will always be balnk. And validity dates can be maintained for other items in the procedure (rule).
What happens in our scenario is when there is a requirement on an item in the substitution procedure (rule) which has a validity date, the first item in the procedure (which can never have validity dates) is never considerd for substituions.
If I remove the validity dates, then the first item in the procedure (rule) is considered for substitutions.
We find this strange and against our business requirement. We want the first item in the procedure (rule) to be considered for substitution ireespective of the validity date for the requested product.
It would be great if you could suggest a method to achieve this.
Thanks & regards,
Arvind.S

Hi Mohan,
Thanks for the response.
We are using back order processing (BOP) for allocation.
We observed that the first item was not getting considered for substitution in the BOP results and also in product view after the BOP run. No stock of that item was allocated for the order taken up in the BOP run.
However, we tried rule evaluation also. It shows the first item also, but in actual allocation the issue exists.
We are not using "start immediately" in check instructions.
Thanks & regards,
Ashok

Validating date problem (simple issue ?)

I am trying to validate a date using the following code:
public boolean validateDate(String testDate) {
try {
SimpleDateFormat sdf = new java.text.SimpleDateFormat("mm/dd/yy");
sdf.setLenient(false);
java.util.Date theDate = sdf.parse(testDate);
return true;
catch(Exception f) {
return false;
No matter what I pass in the date will be formatted as the month January. For example: 5/8/02, 05/08/02 and 05/08/2002 will all format as 1/8/02. This happens to every valid date I pass in. This function is catching the exceptions of an invalid date. I have searched the newsgroups and found many posts and have compared their code with mine and there does not seem to be a problem with the code.
If anyone can give me some insight I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks in advance for any help.

Thanks bbritta - that was driving me nuts.

The SharePoint list query is not valid: Data at the root level is invalid. Line 1, position 1. (rsSPDataProviderError)

Hi there,
All my reports are throwing below error in a sharepoint site configured with Access services. Does anyone have a clue what's causing it?
An error has occurred during report processing. (rsProcessingAborted)
Query execution failed for dataset 'Default'. (rsErrorExecutingCommand)
The SharePoint list query is not valid: Data at the root level is invalid. Line 1, position 1. (rsSPDataProviderError)
Thanks
Manvir

Hi Manvir,
For troubleshooting your issue, please go to C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\wss\VirtualDirectories\ find your Web Application (represented by a port number), then delete an unknown folder created by sharepoint, namely vti_cnf from all the folders and sub-folders in
your web application.
Reference:
http://forums.asp.net/t/985790.aspx?Data+at+the+root+level+is+invalid+Line+1+position+1
Best Regards,
Eric
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

NWBC:CREATE DATA:Type WDR_APP_PROP_DISP_LOADINGPAGE is no valid data type

HI Experts,
We want to access our servers through NWBC. All setting and configuration related is done also services in SICF are activated.But when we are in to NWBC it shows following error. Kindly help to resolve this
Error when processing your request
What has happened?
The URL https://hpi-dev.domainname.local:44301/sap/bc/webdynpro/sap/powl was not called due to an error.
Note
The following error text was processed in the system ERD : CREATE DATA: The specified type WDR_APP_PROP_DISP_LOADINGPAGE is no valid data type.
The error occurred on the application server HPI-DEV_ERD_01 and in the work process 0 .
The termination type was: RABAX_STATE
The ABAP call stack was:
Method: CONVERT_XML_TO_STRING of program CL_WDR_CONFIGURATION_UTILS====CP
Method: CONVERT_XML_TO_STRING of program CL_WDR_CONFIG_APPL_PARAM======CP
Method: READ_DATA of program CL_WDR_CONFIG_APPL_PARAM======CP
Method: INIT_DATA of program CL_WDR_CONFIG_APPL_PARAM======CP
Method: GET_DATA of program CL_WDR_CONFIG_APPL_PARAM======CP
Method: CONSTRUCTOR of program SAPLWDR_RUNTIME_REPOSITORY
Function: WDR_GET_REPOSITORY of program SAPLWDR_RUNTIME_REPOSITORY
Method: IF_WDR_RUNTIME~GET_RR_APPLICATION of program CL_WDR_MAIN_TASK==============CP
Method: CREATE_APPLICATION of program CL_WDR_CLIENT_ABSTRACT_HTTP===CP
Method: IF_HTTP_EXTENSION~HANDLE_REQUEST of program CL_WDR_MAIN_TASK==============CP
What can I do?
If the termination type was RABAX_STATE, then you can find more information on the cause of the termination in the system ERD in transaction ST22.
If the termination type was ABORT_MESSAGE_STATE, then you can find more information on the cause of the termination on the application server HPI-DEV_ERD_01 in transaction SM21.
If the termination type was ERROR_MESSAGE_STATE, then you can search for more information in the trace file for the work process 0 in transaction ST11 on the application server HPI-DEV_ERD_01 . In some situations, you may also need to analyze the trace files of other work processes.
If you do not yet have a user ID, contact your system administrator.
Error code: ICF-IE-https -c: 100 -u: SRAUT -l: E -s: ERD -i: HPI-DEV_ERD_01 -w: 0 -d: 20111220 -t: 003857 -v: RABAX_STATE -e: CREATE_DATA_UNKNOWN_TYPE
HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error
Your SAP Internet Communication Framework Team

Hi,
Regarding the issue reported by you kinly refer in detail the solution section of the following SAP Note:
1432358 - Starting application with Loading Animation
It seems that the data element WDR_APP_PROP_DISP_LOADINGPAGE is not created in your system.
This note should help you out.
Regards,
Abhishek

SSL certificate validation date

Greetings,
Why is it that on a SSL module, certificate validity dates are different when cheking
"show crypto ca trustpoints" and
"show ssl-proxy certificate-history" ?
Doesn't the "certificate-history" show the current certificate as well the previously imported ones?
Do we refere only to "show crypto ca trustpoints" to track certificate validity end date?
SSL001#show crypto ca trustpoints testing123
Certificate
Subject:
Name: testing123
CN = testing123
OU = Terms of use at http://www.verisign.com
O = WWW
L = WW
ST = WW
C = WW
CRL Distribution Point:
http://SVRIntl-crl.verisign.com/SVRIntl.crl
Validity Date:
start date: 00:00:00 UTC Apr 11 2006
end date: 23:59:59 UTC Apr 10 2008
renew date: 00:00:00 UTC Jan 1 1970
Associated Trustpoints: testing123
SSL001#show ssl-proxy certificate-history service proxyssl
Record 132, Timestamp: 3w6d, 21:34:55 UTC May 23 2006
Installed Service Certificate, Index 131
Proxy Service: proxyssl, Trust Point: testing123
Validity Start Time: 15:31:50 UTC Nov 15 2005
End Time: 15:31:50 UTC Nov 15 2006
Renew Time: 00:00:00 UTC Jan 1 1970
Thanks

To authenticate the SSL client, the SSL module verifies the following:
* The certificate at one level is properly signed by the issuer at the next level.
* At least one of the issuer certificates in the certificate chain is trusted by the SSL proxy service.
* None of the certificates in the certificate chain is in the certificate revocation list (CRL) and rejected by any access control list (ACL).
For verifying the SSL client certificates, the SSL module is configured with a list of trusted certificate authorities (certificate authority pool). The SSL module trusts only the certificates issued by the certificate authorities that you configure in the certificate authority pool.

Master data Issue --- materials have unassigned or # values ...!!

Hello Experts,
I am facing an issue that the Customer Data is missing in a BEx Report.
Data Flow is 2LIS_13_VDITM --> DSO1 --> Merging DSO --> Cube --> Multiprovider --> Bex Report.
Exact issue is Customers in the Bex Report has unassigned to Sales Office, Sales Group, Sales District.
The only reason a customer should show up under u201Cunassignedu201D or u201C#u201D is if itu2019s improperly set up in the system.
customers are assigned with two values. one which has data and the other which has unassigned value.
I wanted to know, how do i check if the matierials are valid to have unassigned Values ?
Checked the Merging DSO and saw that there are actually values assigned values for the affected matierials.
After that checked the Cube data values are displayed except the Master Data values.
I guess..its completely related to Master data. I would like to know how can i resolve this issue.
Please reply me if you face this kind of master data issue in your expeiriance.
Thanks,
SN.

Hi,
Are Sales Office, Sales Group, Sales District are attributes of Customer?
In case they are, then the customers will be unassigned to Sales Office, Sales Group, Sales District in case the data for these attributes is loaded to the customer attributes.
and also check if the customer characteristic is properly assigned in the multiprovider.
Check if it helps.
Regards,
Joe

Access Enforcer (error in creating a request)

Hi All,
when i am creating a new request in Access Enforcer . After filling alll the details and clicking the submit button it is showing a error in creating request .Path not found.

Hello,
You must have to select at least one condition attribute while creating your initiator. It seems initiator condition not meeting the details you are filling in your request. So it is not able to trigger the workflow initiator.
For simple scenario, if you are filling your company details in your request then change your initiator condition attribute to "Company".(Don't include more condition attributes for now). Once it works out then change initiator details back to your requirements.
Please let me know if this will not resolve your issue.
Thanks
Himadama

The email address assoc. with my iTunes account is no longer valid. can't access it. need to change it in iTunes but can't access account. even my birthdate is incorrect in iTunes...so can't log in. any suggestions on how to log in and edit info???

the email address assoc. with my iTunes account is no longer valid. can't access it. need to change it in iTunes but can't access account. even my birthdate is incorrect in iTunes...so can't log in. any suggestions on how to log in and edit info???

There is nothing that you can do to get rid of the balance on your own. Contact iTunes Store Support and seek their assistance. I believe that they can reset your balance for you.
https://expresslane.apple.com/Issues.action

Validity date in RFQ

Hi all,
Can anyone explain me what is the correct definition of the Validity start date and end date in the RFQ.
The reason I am asking this question is , If you eneter the start date and end date in the RFQ and create the PO with reference to RFQ, these dates gets copied on to the PO. if the document type of PO is NB then these fields are not visible on PO screen bu in the background the table EKPO is updated with these two filed. And the if you try to eneter the SES after these dates sysetm is not allowing and giving the message as SES date is beyond the valididty date.
Has any one come across any such issue. Can any one suggest any solution to this.

Hi Don,
RFQ means...requesting quotation from a vendor. Validity date start and validity end means the quotation should be send before the validity end date from the vendor. Before getting the quotation and before knowing the rate, how could you make purchase order to that vendor. Before you rise PO, you should maintain the quotation in ME47. As per standard SAP, you should rise po w.r.to quotation.
Regards,
Prasath

Validity date issue: Access Enforcer

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for