Valuation category - display mode

Dear Experts,
We have created a new plant, also all the necessary split valuation configurations are done. But while trying to create a material master through MM01, in the Accounting1 view the valuation category " " is coming in display mode. How to bring this field in optional mode.
Thanks in advance and your help is sicerely appreciated.
Thanks
Vijay

Hi,
May be split valuation category not activated for ur new plant.
Lets say example: You have material "X" in Plant "P001" with valuation catagory "V" and valution types "T001" & "T002"
Now create a new plant "P002" and you want extend the same material material "X" to Plant "P002" from Plant "P001"
But before that ,check your Valuations Types("T001" & "T002") are active with ur new Plant "P200" or not? In which split Valuation Categories is required in OMWC t.code... {if not active Valuations Types("T001" & "T002") for new Plant "P002" }, if not active, just active it & save.
Regards,
Biju K

Similar Messages

Change item category Display mode in sales order (Third Party )

Hi all,
I am creating sales order with reference to sales contract but at the time of sales order we don't have enoff stock to deliver to customer , so we have deiced to Third party sales process
But the problem is while creating a sales order with reference to Sales contract the line item of the sales order in grad Mode ( Not changeable mode )
Can any one guide me how sales order line item should be in active mode so i can change the Item category as a TAS third party item category
Help me regards this
Thanks
Rajesh

Hi all.
Thanks for response
I maintain all configuration, But the problem is while creating Sales Order with reference to Contract
the Sales Order line item in grad Mode i am unable to change item category as TAS
i mean TAN is on Display Mode
and we are using Varient config for that material
Please guide me where i need to Configure so system should allow me change item category in sales order please guide me
Thanks
Rajesh
Edited by: RAJESH KUMAR on Jun 16, 2009 10:23 PM

Output types are not getting displayed in Outbound Delivery in Display mode

Hello,
The actual requirement is that output types should get attched to the outbound delivery when we do GI(Good Issue) on the outbound delivery.
So, I have created an outbound delivery and did GI on it through IDoc. But, I can not see output types on the delivery (To see output types, go to Extra -> Output -> Header in VL03N) in the display mode. However, I can see in change mode (VL02N).
Could you please suggest the solution for this?

Hi sreeram,
go to crm -> transactions -> basic settings -> define transaction types
copy default email cx03 and create new zemail.
assign that zemail to bus2000126 business activity.select the business activity and click on customizing header.assign the category email. click on channel. maintain the channels 1)GUI crm webclient UI, 2)ICW Interaction center webclient.
save the changes.
go to crm -> transactions -> basic settings -> settings for activities -> maintain categories, goals, priorities -> click on assign categories to transaction types.
assign the category email(which you have assigned above) to the transaction type zemail.
even check maintain categories as well
click on maintain categories -> check 401 email assigned to class G email.
Regards
Krishna

All fields should be in Display mode except Plant field in Va02 and VA32

Respected Guru's,
I want all the fields in VA02 and VA32( Change t-codes) to be in display mode, further user should be able to change the Plant value alone in sales tab.
Is it possible to restrict it with the help of Authorization or does it requires customization.
Please Help me in this regard.
Thank tou,
Daya

Thanks for your information
What is the transaction code for that
ME29N - DISPLAY SCREEN SETTING ALREADY I HAVE DONE
account assignment category is working only at item overview level, input - k iS IN DISPLAY MODE
NOT account assignment tab fields
please give the transaction code information so that it will be helpful for me

Different Valuation Class for Valuation category C1,C2,C3

Hi All,
I created a material with valuation category C. The material had valuation class 3042 which I created as per requirement of client. Now when I am extending the same material for valuation category C1, C2, C3 the system is only allowing me to choose valuation class 3040 which is standard sap valuation class for spare parts. Can anyone suggest if I need to create separate valuation class for C1, C2 & C3. I have split valuation also activated in the system.

Go to MMAM and then give the material and give the new valuation class and execute it. That material have change from old valuation class to new valuation class.
Example: You create material No: 678 under the Finished goods. Finished goods valuation class is 7920 is assigned in Accounting Tab 1. You want to change "678" material to Raw Material.
Go to T.Code : MMAM
Material                                : 678
New Valuation Class             : Raw Material ( Select from F4)
                                               Which Valuation area you want
Old Valuation Class              : Finished goods ( its under gray mode
                                                                          i.e can not change)
Edited by: Ganti on Dec 4, 2010 9:08 AM

Inventory problem for material with valuation category X

Hi!
During annual inventory, I found material in a storage location that doesn't exist in SAP as material master.
I have created the material, managed in batches and valuation category X.
I have created a batch with MSC1N and now I am trying to create an inventory document to put this material on stock; but when I am trying to create the inventory document with MI01 or MI31, the system is telling me :
"Batch 0000043183 does not contain a valuation type
Message no. M7045
Diagnosis
The material is subject to split valuation, but the batch entered has not been assigned to a valuation type.
System Response
Any transaction/event that has the effect of changing the stock balance will be rejected for this batch.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator.
If you are authorized to do so, do you wish to check the valuation category in the material master record?
Do you want to display the batch?"
Now, I don't know exactly what can I do to be able to create the inventory document.
Any ideas.....
Thanks

Since you have created a material master with valuation category that means the system is taking that material either as split valuated or to-be split valuated...the reason of this error you will find out if you go to MSC2N with material-batch & plant you will find in the Basic data 1 tab that Valuation type field is mandatory...so either you have to split valuate the item further and then enter the same valuation type in MSC2N or otherwise if you not still done any transaction with the material master then remove the valuation category from the material master
Regards,
Indranil

Changing valuation category

Hi folks,
I want to change valuation category of a material which has already been created with a different val category.
No stock or other data exist for the same. Please let me know the steps to change it at table level.
Regards,
Yogesh

Hi All,
I am using batch valuation for a particular plant for specific material. For that I am using Valuation catagory X in Accounting View 1 of Material Master.
By mistake business has maintained this valuation catagory X for some other plant also and some transaction is also done so some valuation type data is also created.
Now after ensuring all document closed and no stock still I am not able to remove valuation catagory indicator X. It is giving error when I am going to display error than I see following :
"Valuation data already exists for valuation types that are
not compatible with the new valuation category."
I do not want to delete this Valuation catagory as the same is being used in other plant .
I can not go to third solution also as need to revert valuation catagory for specific material in particular plant. I mean specific material in particular plant is with Valuation catagory X and now it has to be without split / batch valuation so X need to be removed.
Pls. advice.
Regards
Sanjay

Unable to capture value inside parameter T_LFBK of FK03 in display mode

Hi Experts,
I have to trigger a mail whenever there is a change in fields that are captured in parameter t_ffbk.
However i am unable to capture the the screen values for this parameter as FK03 is in display mode.Please tell me how can i capture the screen field values in parameter T_LFBK.
<Point offer removed by moderator>
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Vinod Kumar on Jul 28, 2011 5:48 PM

Hi Experts,
I have to trigger a mail whenever there is a change in fields that are captured in parameter t_ffbk.
However i am unable to capture the the screen values for this parameter as FK03 is in display mode.Please tell me how can i capture the screen field values in parameter T_LFBK.
<Point offer removed by moderator>
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Vinod Kumar on Jul 28, 2011 5:48 PM

Apple Mini DVI to DVI Adapter to connect Win7 tower to iMac / Target Display Mode

I currently run Windows on bootcamp on the iMac (Mid-2011), although the tasks I perform (3D modelling, rendering and such) cause the Mac to get very hot, and as a result hae a slight burn mark on the LED LCD screen.
I am buying a Windows machine, and am to uninstall bootcamp and use the Mac purely for OSX, but use the iMac screen as a monitor for the tower using Target Display Mode. My issue is - the Windows 7 tower only has DVI output. And as I understand, the Mid-2011 iMac only supports Target Display Mode via a thunderbolt cable.
My question is - Will the Apple Mini DVI to DVI adapter allow me to connect the DVI-only tower to the iMac? Thanks in advance x

Oh, I should mention also that the iMac is the 27" model. Mid-2011 3.4Ghz Intel Core i7 with 4GB RAM and 1TB Harddrive. And ATI HD5450 1GB Graphics.

Can windows 8.1 in boot Camp display in target display mode on an IMac?

I have given up on Windows 7 running in Boot Camp on my 15" MacBook Pro and displaying it on my 27" IMac via thunderbolt and Target Display Mode.
The FAQ concerning Target Dsiplay Mode farily clearly says Windows 7 won't work.
But it does not say Windows 8.1 will or will not drive Target Display Mode via thunderbolt.
see: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5219, question 29
Has anyone found that running Windows 8.1 in BootCamp on a MacBook Pro Retina mid 2012 will display via a thunderbolt cable in to Target Display Mode on a late 2013 IMac 27"?
I don't want to go to the trouble of installing Windows 8.1 and trashing my otherwise functional Windows 7 Boot Camp installation unless it is going to display properly on my late 2013 27" IMac running OSX 10.9.3 via thunderbolt.
Thanks in advance!

no, tdm doesn't work under bootcamp regardless of which windows is being used, imho i don't think it will ever work under bootcamp

IllegalStateException when changing display mode of JFrame

My application has an information console inside a JFrame. The console is continually updating and repainting.
I let the user drag this window wherever they want, resize it how they want, etc. I also give them the ability to select one of three display modes:
- "Decorated Window"
- "Undecorated Maximized Window"
- "Undecorated Fullscreen Exclusive Window"
The toggling between modes normally works well, but occasionally an "IllegalStateException: Buffers have not yet been created" is thrown by (from what I can tell), a component on the console that's trying to be repainted.
Seems obvious to me that something doesn't like the fact that the JFrame has been disposed for an instant and can't deal with it appropriately. Question is, what the hell can I do about it?
I believe everything continues fine despite the exception (although I have a hard time reproducing on my system), but still, it's a wart and I'd like to chop it off.
Here's my code for changing the window mode.
public void setDisplayMode(Component parent,
         ConsoleDisplayMode newDisplayMode) {
     GraphicsDevice device = this.getGraphicsConfiguration().getDevice();
     int state;
     switch (newDisplayMode) {
     case DisplayAsDecoratedWindow:
         // Add the decorations
         this.dispose();
         this.setUndecorated(false);
         this.setVisible(true);
         device.setFullScreenWindow(null);
         // De-iconify
         state = this.getExtendedState();
         state &= ~JFrame.ICONIFIED;
         this.setExtendedState(state);
         // Minimize
         state = this.getExtendedState();
         state &= ~JFrame.MAXIMIZED_BOTH;
         this.setExtendedState(state);
         break;
     case DisplayAsUndecoratedWindow:
         // Remove the decorations
         this.dispose();
         this.setUndecorated(true);
         this.setVisible(true);
         device.setFullScreenWindow(null);
         // Make sure it is de-iconified
         state = this.getExtendedState();
         state &= ~JFrame.ICONIFIED;
         this.setExtendedState(state);
         // Maximize
         state = this.getExtendedState();
         state |= JFrame.MAXIMIZED_BOTH;
         this.setExtendedState(state);
         break;
     case DisplayFullScreenExclusive:
         if (device.isFullScreenSupported()) {
          int choice = JOptionPane
               .showConfirmDialog(
                    parent,
                    "Warning:\n\n"
                         + "This mode is meant for users with a multiple-monitor configuration.\n"
                         + "In this mode, the console controls the graphics device exclusively\n"
                         + "and other windows (such as the other TM windows and dialogs) cannot\n"
                         + "be displayed over the console.\n\n"
                         + "If you have a single monitor, use the mode called\n"
                         + "\""
                         + ConsoleDisplayMode.DisplayAsUndecoratedWindow
                              .toString() + "\".\n\n"
                         + "Continue with this mode?",
                    "Confirm full-screen mode",
                    JOptionPane.YES_NO_OPTION,
                    JOptionPane.WARNING_MESSAGE, ChipIconFactory
                         .getWarningChipIcon());
          if (choice == JOptionPane.YES_OPTION) {
              this.dispose();
              this.setUndecorated(true);
              this.setVisible(true);
              state = this.getExtendedState();
              state &= ~JFrame.ICONIFIED;
              this.setExtendedState(state);
              device.setFullScreenWindow(this);
         } else {
          JOptionPane
               .showMessageDialog(
                    null,
                    "Your graphics device does not support full-screen mode",
                    "Unable to display in full-screen mode",
                    JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE, ChipIconFactory
                         .getErrorChipIcon());
         break;
    }

jneau wrote:
My application has an information console inside a JFrame. The console is continually updating and repainting.
The toggling between modes normally works well, but occasionally an "IllegalStateException: Buffers have not yet been created" is thrown by (from what I can tell), a component on the console that's trying to be repainted.Are you certain all your interaction with the GUI happens on the EDT?

I am Not Getting a Additional Tab in ZMIGO in Display mode

Dear Gurus ,
                      I have Impelemented a Migo Badi and Created a Additional Tab in MIGO . The Additional Tab is getting Displayed in Create Mode but the same is not getting in Dispay Mode . Can Any Body help me for the same .
                                  I have Created two screen for the same .
0001 is for Created and 0002 is for Display mode . And in PBO i rave checked the condition for the same which i am pasing below for your refrence . Can any body please help me .
READ TABLE gt_scrn_active INTO ls_scrn_active
                            WITH KEY line_id = i_line_id .
CHECK ls_scrn_active-active EQ 'X'.
External subscreen:
The content of global field G_NO_INPUT (set in method MODE_SET) will
influence the number of external subsreen:
IF g_no_input IS INITIAL.
    e_cprog   = 'SAPLZCFG_JEWELLERY'.
    e_dynnr   = '0001'.                     "External fields: Input
    e_heading = 'Additional Unit'(004).
ELSE .
    e_cprog   = 'SAPLZCFG_JEWELLERY'.
    e_dynnr   = '0002'.                     "External fields: Input
    e_heading = 'Additional Unit'(004).
ENDIF .
Regards
S.B.Shankar

hi,
just i basice ? have you checked the status of BADI is it implemented.
Atul

Field value is not getting populated in Display mode

Hello All,
I have created a custom drop down field in the DEAL component through EEWB. From the GUI, I could able to select a value form the drop down list field and save it.
In DISPLAY mode, the value is not showing but when I change the screen to EDIT mode then the value is getting populated.
Please advise.
Thanks in advance.

When debugging the set_property method I see the following code:
If ME->IS_CHANGEABLE( ) = ABAP_TRUE and                  "CLASS=CL_CRM_BOL_ENTITY
           LV_PROPS_OBJ->GET_PROPERTY_BY_IDX( LV_IDX ) ne IF_GENIL_OBJ_ATTR_PROPERTIES=>READ_ONLY
*     change value
      <VALUE> = IV_VALUE.
In display mode none of these conditions are fulfilled, meaning value is not set.
So, is there a way of avoiding this behavior?

Why not all fields dimmed or show in display mode after system status TECO and CLSD for Project

Dear All,
When Sets the system status TECO or even CLSD all fields for WBS Elements are not goes to Display mode. User can still edit them or change then.
The fields are:
1. WBS Element Description, technical name: PRPS-POST1
2. Person responsible number, technical name: PRPS-VERNR
Other Progress and Customer enhancement tab pages for WBS Element all fields there also editable in TECO and CLSD system status.
The client do not want to set LOCK system status for master data option.
Is there any enhancement or standard way of doing that?
Regards
Saqib Usman

Dear Saqib,
Its a standard behavior of the system. In CLSD status, transactional data like Procurement gets restricted along with WBSE no and its scheduling details. But it allows to you change like WBSE desc./Responsible person.
Also go thru the below link for clarification of WBSE system status:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/ee/41f82246ee11d189470000e829fbbd/content.htm
For locking all master data, as above experts suggest, you should use MDLK/LKD.
Regards
Shishir

Performance Issues with Debugging even in Display Mode

Hi not certain if this would sit in Security, ABAP or Basis, but lets start here as it is security related.
S_DEVELOP with any activity on DEBUG on a production system is a concern, but what are the performance related issues when a super user has to go into debug in display only on a production system because of a really complex issue?
I've heard in the past of a scenario where system performance was impacted, and we have notes around the allocation of S_DEVELOP display DEBUG access to this point. (I've summarised these below)
The risk with debug is associated with the length of time that the actual debugging process is being performed.
u2022 Work processes are dedicated solely to the users for the duration of the debug. If these are being performed for a long time, these can cause issues with not enough work processes being available.
u2022 It can cause DB2 locks. If the debug session last awhile, DB2 locks are not released. This impacts the availability of tablespaces, thus, affecting various transactions running across the system.
Even with these concerns, security will often get asked for debug display access.
As security is about risk identification, assessment and then controlled access what do other organisations do?
Options (not exhaustive) are "No Debug ever" or "Debug display only via a fire fight or super user on a time limited basis".
We are currently in the "debug display only via fire fight" camp, but would like to canvas opinion on this.
As one of the concepts of security is Availability of data (and to an extent ensuring the systems are up and running) do the performance risks push the security function to the "No Debug Ever" stance.

If you need to debug in production, then 9 times out of 10 you need to do root-cause analysis: The developer is the problem.
Writing sloppy code and not testing properly should not be an excuse for debugging in production.
But of course, there are exceptions even when you do try to keep them to a minimum.
To add to Jurjen's comments, also note that the debugger only has a limited capability of doing a rollback. So you can quite easily and unintentionally create inconsistencies in the system - also in display mode - which is an integrity problem, and typically more critical than availability problems or even potential confidentiality concerns.
Cheers,
Julius
Edited by: Julius Bussche on May 15, 2009 10:50 AM

Valuation category - display mode

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for