VAlue based MRP
Hi Experts,
I need one help on MRP. My client requirs value to be displayed for each planning quantity in the stock requirement list. Is there any way we can see both planned quantity and and it's value. Requirement is -- They have a budget constraint. If the budget crosses certain limit, the planned quantity will change.
Can any one help on this. If that can not be displayed on the Stock requirement list, can you give some idea where to get the value of the planned quantity. May be some report or table......
Regards,
Samar
Hi!,
What your client needs basically is the procurement based on cost. So instead of doing a post analysis of MRP with reference to cost you should try to use cost based lot sizing which will instruct system to plan a material in a way that it shouldn't exceed the budget. Cost based lot size procedure is nothing but a balance between your procurement cost and inventory carying cost. Just try to analyse the requirement though this way and check which of the cost based lot size procedure is suitable for your scenario. I hope this will help you in solving the problem.
regards,
Uday
Similar Messages
-
Steps in Fore Cast Based MRP-reg
Hi,
we would like to implement forecast based MRP for spare parts which we supply against sales order from dealers
request you to provide us step by step working with forecast based MRP
1. what are the inputs for forecast based MRP
2. Process of forecast based MRP
3.Out put of forecast based MRP
4. reduction of requirements
etc...
madhu kiran.Hi Madhu,
Use
Forecast-based planning is also based on material consumption. Like reorder point planning, forecast-based planning operates using historical values and forecast values and future requirements are determined via the integrated forecasting program. However, in contrast to reorder point planning, these values then form the basis of the planning run. The forecast values therefore have a direct effect in MRP as forecast requirements.
Features
The forecast, which calculates future requirements using historical data, is carried out at regular intervals. This offers the advantage that requirements, which are automatically determined, are continually adapted to suit current consumption needs. The forecast requirement is reduced by the material withdrawal so that the forecast requirement quantity that has already been produced is not included in the planning run again.
Reducing Forecast Requirements
*Reducing forecast requirements by consumption
If consumption is higher than the forecast requirements in the current month, then the system also reduces future forecast requirements.
*Reducing current forecast requirements by consumption
If consumption is higher than the forecast requirements in the current month, then the system does not reduce future forecast requirements.
*Average reduction of the forecast requirements
The reduction of the forecast requirements is based on average daily consumption. Actual consumption data is not relevant.
The system calculates the average daily requirement first using the formula forecast requirement/number of workdays in the forecast period.
The forecast requirements are then reduced by the quantity resulting from the following formula: number of workdays worked x average daily requirements.
Period Pattern and Forecast Periods
You can specify the period pattern for the forecast (daily, weekly, monthly or per accounting period) and the number of periods to be included in the forecast individually for each material. It is possible, however, that the forecast period pattern is not specific enough for planning purposes. In this case, you can define per material that the forecast requirements should be divided according to a finer period pattern for planning. You can also define how many forecast periods are to be taken into account during requirements planning. The splitting indicator is defined in Customizing for MRP per plant and per period unit and is assigned to the material in the material master.
For a monthly forecast, the requirements date would be set on the first workday of the month because, for planning, it is assumed that the total requirement must be available at the beginning of the period. You can then divide this monthly requirement into either daily or weekly requirements.
Prerequisites
You have set an MRP type for forecast-based planning in the material master (MRP 1 view).
You define MRP types in Customizing for MRP in the IMG activity Check MRP types.
Process Flow
1.The system copies the requirements quantities that it has forecast in the requirements planning run and calculates net requirements. During this calculation, every period is checked to make sure that the forecast requirements are covered either by available stock, by planned receipts from purchasing or by production. If a material shortage occurs, the system generates a procurement proposal.
2.The system calculates the quantity recorded in the procurement proposal according to the lot-sizing procedure that you specified in the material master. Depending on the lot-sizing procedure, several forecast requirements are grouped together into one lot.
3.For every procurement proposal, the system calculates the date on which it must be converted into a purchase order or a production order.
Hope this helps you.
Regards,
Vinodh -
Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)
Dear all,
There is this field in mateial master called "Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)" in accounting view 1,
1 - May I know what is this field about (in between our company using material ledger).
2 - May I know why the value of this field are different between our company period 6 and period 7 for this year? what contribute to it? and is it something wrong with different value between two different period or absolutely normal?
Thanks.
TuffDear all,
Does anyone know my question?
Thanks,
tuff -
Value based on the periodic unit price(only with pr.ctrl S) field in MatMas
Dear all,
There is this field in mateial master called "Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)" in accounting view 1,
1 - May I know what is this field about (in between our company using material ledger).
2 - May I know why the value of this field are different between our company period 6 and period 7 for this year? what contribute to it? and is it something wrong with different value between two different period or absolutely normal?
Thanks.
TuffHi Tuffy,
For your 1st query:
PUP field in Accounting 1 (if ML is active, Price Determination indicator=3) is the result of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) closing entry.
For your 2nd query:
In most of the cases the values will be different in Previous Period and Current Period. e.g.Period 6 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 6 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 5). Period 7 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 7 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 6).
The reason for the different values: Price differences, Exchange rate differences, Price/Exchange rate differences from Low lower materials, etc.
Thanks & Regards,
ADI -
Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S) field in mat.
Dear all,
There is this field in mateial master called "Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)" in accounting view 1,
1 - May I know what is this field about (in between our company using material ledger).
2 - May I know why the value of this field are different between our company period 6 and period 7 for this year? what contribute to it? and is it something wrong with different value between two different period or absolutely normal?
Thanks.
TuffHi Tuffy,
For your 1st query:
PUP field in Accounting 1 (if ML is active, Price Determination indicator=3) is the result of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) closing entry.
For your 2nd query:
In most of the cases the values will be different in Previous Period and Current Period. e.g.Period 6 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 6 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 5). Period 7 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 7 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 6).
The reason for the different values: Price differences, Exchange rate differences, Price/Exchange rate differences from Low lower materials, etc.
Thanks & Regards,
ADI -
Preaggregation across value based hierarchy dimension in 11g
Hi All,
I have created a cube with 6 dimensions in olap 11g. One of those six dimensions has only one hierarchy which is value based hierarchy. I have chosen level based aggregation as I know at what levels exactly users are going to query. When I was going through the dimensions to choose levels to preaggregate I noticed there were no options available for my value based hierarchy dimension ( I could see "all" option for the same case in 10g) then I tried to look for definitions of underlying objects just to make sure it will preaggregate data across my value based hierarchy dimension.
I found value set corresponding to my value based hierarchy dimension in <CUBE NAME>SOLVEAGGMAP object , which AWM uses to decide which dimension values to preaggregate but if I do rpr on that value set (rp r<CUBE NAME>SOLVE<DIMENSION NAME>_PVSET) it shows NA so my question is can I pre aggregate across value based hierarchy dimension in olap 11g?
Olap Version: 11.2.0.1
AWM version: 11.2.0.1
ThanksEven if you know exactly which levels your users will query, percent based precompute (e.g. 30%) may still be faster in practice because queries are returned using 'sparse looping' instead of 'dense looping'. This was the single biggest performance advantage of 11g over 10g.
But if you still want to use level based precompute, then you should look at the XML template for the cube (as saved by AWM, for example). In it you should find something called PrecomputeCondition. This defines the set of members that are precomputed. Here is an example I just created using the GLOBAL schema
<PrecomputeCondition>
<![CDATA[
"TIME" LEVELS ("TIME"."MONTH", "TIME".CALENDAR_QUARTER, "TIME".CALENDAR_YEAR),
CHANNEL LEVELS (CHANNEL.TOTAL_CHANNEL, CHANNEL.CHANNEL),
CUSTOMER LEVELS (CUSTOMER.MARKET_SEGMENT, CUSTOMER.REGION, CUSTOMER.SHIP_TO),
PRODUCT LEVELS (PRODUCT.CLASS, PRODUCT.FAMILY, PRODUCT.ITEM)]]>
</PrecomputeCondition>The PrecomputeCondition is also visible through the USER_CUBES view.
SELECT PRECOMPUTE_CONDITION
FROM USER_CUBES
WHERE CUBE_NAME = 'MY_CUBE';You can hand modify this condition in the XML to specify an alternative 'non level based' precompute condition for any dimension. For example, if you define an attribute named 'SHOULD_PRECOMPUTE' on your PRODUCT dimension that is 1 for members to be precomputed and 0 for all others, then you can change the condition as follows.
<PrecomputeCondition>
<![CDATA[
"TIME" LEVELS ("TIME"."MONTH", "TIME".CALENDAR_QUARTER, "TIME".CALENDAR_YEAR),
CHANNEL LEVELS (CHANNEL.TOTAL_CHANNEL, CHANNEL.CHANNEL),
CUSTOMER LEVELS (CUSTOMER.MARKET_SEGMENT, CUSTOMER.REGION, CUSTOMER.SHIP_TO),
PRODUCT WHERE PRODUCT.SHOULD_PRECOMPUTE = 1]]>
</PrecomputeCondition>If you recreate the cube from the XML with this condition, then the PVSET valueset you discovered should contain all dimension members for which the attribute value is 1. This gives you complete control over what is precomputed. Note that AWM doesn't support this form of condition, so it won't show up if you go to the Precompute tab, but it is valid for the server. The PL/SQL below will modify the PrecomputeCondition (for the cube named MYCUBE) without going through AWM.
begin
dbms_cube.import_xml(q'!
<Metadata
Version="1.3"
MinimumDatabaseVersion="11.2.0.2">
<Cube Name="MY_CUBE">
<Organization>
<AWCubeOrganization>
<PrecomputeCondition>
<![CDATA[
"TIME" LEVELS ("TIME"."MONTH","TIME".CALENDAR_QUARTER, "TIME".CALENDAR_YEAR),
CHANNEL LEVELS (CHANNEL.TOTAL_CHANNEL,CHANNEL.CHANNEL),
CUSTOMER LEVELS (CUSTOMER.MARKET_SEGMENT,CUSTOMER.REGION,CUSTOMER.SHIP_TO),
PRODUCT WHERE PRODUCT.SHOULD_PRECOMPUTE = 1]]>
</PrecomputeCondition>
</AWCubeOrganization>
</Organization>
</Cube>
</Metadata>
end;
/ -
Value based hierarchy 11g question
Hi,
in my BMM i've created a level based hierarchy composed of two levels: TOTAL and Audiologist
Total level is setted as Grand Total level and doesn't have logical columns.
At audiologist level insted i drag and drop two logical columns: Audiologist Code and Audiologist Name
Then i created two keys.
First Key: Audiologist Code - Use to display: None
Second Key: Audiologist Code and Audiologist Name - Use to display : YES
Graphically my hierarchy is as follow:
Total-----
Audiologist
Audiologist Code
Audiologist Name
Now i would like that if i drill down Total appear simultaneously two columns: Audiologist Code and Audiologist Name.
Is it possible? I remember that in 10 it was.
It's quite urgent.
ThanksBased on my experience of OWB10gR2 the option to create a "Value Based" hierarchy is only enabled if you create an AW based OLAP model. If you want to create a ROLAP model then I do not think this is possible.
Question is why create a ROLAP model when you could get better performance and more powerful analytical features by using a multidimensional model within an analytic workspace.
Keith -
How to get ATINN value based on material number and Class Type ?
I have below SELECT stmt code which gives the correct value of atwrt based on materil no and ATINN.
However in quality system, it is failing because in quality system "atinn" value is not 0000000381. It is different.
So how can I get ATINN(Internal characteristic) value based on material number and Class Type?
-Obtain the batch characterstic value for the Material******************
SELECT atwrt
UP TO 1 ROWS
INTO v_charvalue
FROM ausp
WHERE objek = mcha-matnr
AND atinn = '0000000381' " 'US80_FRENCH_ON_LABEL'
AND klart = '001'.
THANKS N ADVANCE.Hi SAm,
use the Below function module to get the Atinn for Atwrt for thr Class and MAterial combination..
CALL FUNCTION 'CLAF_CLASSIFICATION_OF_OBJECTS'
EXPORTING
classtype = '023' "Class type
object = w_object "Material number with Leading zeros
no_value_descript = 'X' "Default X
objecttable = 'MCH1' "Table name Mara or MCH1 or MARC
TABLES
t_class = t_class "It return the Batch class available for the above combination
t_objectdata = t_char "Return Batch characteristics(ATWRT) and their value ATINN in this table
EXCEPTIONS
no_classification = 1
no_classtypes = 2
invalid_class_type = 3
OTHERS = 4.
Regards,
Prabhudas -
Problem in populating lookup values based on the lookup query from database
HI all
I have problem of population look-up values based on look-up query
I am giving the details what i am trying
I need to populate the values from the UD_LDAP_USR table into the field of UD_USRGRPC_NisNetTriple of type lookup
i planned to set the properties of lookup as like this
look up query as select UD_LDAP_USR_COMMON_NAME as NisNetTriple from UD_LDAP_USR
ColumnNames as UD_LDAP_USR_COMMON_NAME
Column captions as UD_LDAP_USR_COMMON_NAME
Column width as 30
Lookup Column Name as UD_LDAP_USR_COMMON_NAME
But when i try to add ColumnName as wht i mentioned above i m getting invalid property exception,update failed
I am not sure about that are we able to use other Connector table prefix with UD into the another processFrom
Let me give update on this issue
Urgent,struck my work here
thanks
NagarajThanks for the reply raghav
I tried but it was not working
I gave like what u specified but no use
It is throwing exception like set look-up query for the field
Any one help me out on this issue
Edited by: Nagaraju Chowdary on Jan 21, 2013 3:41 AM
Edited by: Nagaraju Chowdary on Jan 21, 2013 3:42 AM -
Parent-child hierarchy (Value based hierarchy)
As anyone created a parent-child hierarchy using Oracle Warehouse Builder or Analytic Workspace Manager. I am using Oracle 10g Rel2 (and AWM) and OWB 10g Rel2.
The values in the dimension table defines the hierarchy.
I don't see an option of creating a value-based hierarchy in OWB though it is mentioned that it supports this particular hierarchy.
In AWM, I am able to create the hierarchy but when I try to view the data in the dimension it gives an error BIB-9531 Invalid hierarchy specified.
Can you please let me know if I am missing something.
Thanks a lot in advance!
Regards,
MaruthiI've done some work with this, and it hasn't been easy going. There is no built-in ability to form a hierarchy of measure columns, at least nothing that can be predefined as the drill for a fact column. For example: I have 220 details of expense that have an exact arrangement with 5 levels and subtotals. Besides the expense detail there are say 4 dimensions, so the expense detail would be the 5th dimension. I have both arrangements in my rpd: 4D and 5D. They can be used together or separately. The 4D basically has 1000's of measures and there is no relationship between them besides the display arrangement in Answers. The 5D has a 5 column dimension that can drill the expense column from Total_Expense down to the 220 rows of detail expense.
-
Value based hierarchy (parent-child)
Does anybody have any experience in modeling a parent-child dimension ( value based hierarchy instead of level based ) in OBIEE?
Swapan.I've done some work with this, and it hasn't been easy going. There is no built-in ability to form a hierarchy of measure columns, at least nothing that can be predefined as the drill for a fact column. For example: I have 220 details of expense that have an exact arrangement with 5 levels and subtotals. Besides the expense detail there are say 4 dimensions, so the expense detail would be the 5th dimension. I have both arrangements in my rpd: 4D and 5D. They can be used together or separately. The 4D basically has 1000's of measures and there is no relationship between them besides the display arrangement in Answers. The 5D has a 5 column dimension that can drill the expense column from Total_Expense down to the 220 rows of detail expense.
-
Hello,
Has anyone created a parent-child hierarchy using Oracle Warehouse Builder or Analytic Workspace Manager. I am using Oracle 10g Rel2 (and AWM) and OWB 10g Rel2.
The values in the dimension table defines the hierarchy.
I don't see an option of creating a value-based hierarchy in OWB though it is mentioned that it supports this particular hierarchy.
In AWM, I am able to create the hierarchy but when I try to view the data in the dimension it gives an error BIB-9531 Invalid hierarchy specified.
Can you please let me know if I am missing something.
Thanks a lot in advance!
Regards,
MaruthiTo create a value based hierarchy:
define the storage as MOLAP, as a minimum create 2 attributes one for the dimension member (define as business in Identifier column), one for the parent member referenece (define as parent in Identifier column), the hierarchy will have no levels. If you add this dimension into a map, you should have a mapping port for both the dimension member and the parent reference. The dimension will use 'Use natural keys from data source'.
There is an expert for simplifying some of this, not sure on when it will be made available on OTN, it drives the creation of the dimensional objects from tables/views etc.. -
Set default value based on current day value and setItems in Design studio
Hello
I have 2 filters on my dashboard - year and month. The default display of the dashboard should populate current year data. Is it possible to create formula to populate dynamic default value based on the current date using setSelectedValue() ?
Also, for the calendar month, the items are set as below
DD_MONTH.setItems(DS_1.getMemberList("0CALMONTH",
MemberPresentation.INTERNAL_KEY, MemberDisplay.TEXT, 12, "ALL");
This displays month values as 01/2014, 02/2014 ... How can I change these value to display as January if mm = 01 and February if mm = 02 etc..
Thanks
SirishaHi Victor,
I have tried using below statment to populate current year as the default selection value for the dropdown. Used it on Startup, but for some reason it loads all the data when the dashboard is opened the first time. Any ideas?
DS_1.setFilter("0CALYEAR",[Convert.subString(APPLICATION.getInfo().dateNowInternalFormat, 4,6)]);
Thanks
Sirisha -
Problems with value-based hierarchies in Oracle 11gR2
Hello,
I have the following problem:
I want to cereate a dimension with 2 hierarchies.
These hierarchies have to be value-based.
It's no problem to fill and display one of them, but when I fill both and try to display them, at the lowest level, the parent-child relevancy is now incorrect.
Let's display this in OLAP Worksheet for Cube Type OLAP 11g :
lcolwidth=20
rpr down nim_2 w 25 NIM_2_PARENTREL
------------------NIM_2_PARENTREL------------------
------------------NIM_2_HIERLIST-------------------
NIM_2 KON AGT
L1_Total_AGT_A NA NA
L1_Total_KONZ_K NA NA
L2_AGT_A_A NA L1_Total_AGT_A
L2_AGT_B_A NA L1_Total_AGT_A
L2_AGT_C_A NA L1_Total_AGT_A
L2_KONZ_1_K L1_Total_KONZ_K NA
L2_KONZ_2_K L1_Total_KONZ_K NA
L3_100_A NA L2_AGT_A_A
L3_100_K L2_KONZ_1_K NA
L3_200_A NA L2_AGT_B_A
L3_200_K L2_KONZ_1_K NA
L3_300_A NA L2_AGT_C_A
L3_300_K L2_KONZ_2_K NA
L4_101_A NA L3_100_A
L4_101_K L3_100_K NA
L4_301_A NA L3_300_A
L4_301_K L3_300_K NA
L5_302_A NA L4_301_A
L5_302_K L4_301_K NA
100 NA L3_100_A
101 L4_101_K NA
102 NA L4_101_A
200 NA L3_200_A
201 L3_200_K NA
300 L3_300_K NA
301 NA L4_301_A
302 NA L5_302_A
303 NA L5_302_A
304 NA L5_302_AAs you see, the lowest level items are only connectet with one of the hierachies, instead connected with both. (100, 101, e.g)
If I build the same dimension in a 10g Cube, the result is now correct.
Let's display this in OLAP Worksheet for Cube Type OLAP 10g :
lcolwidth=20
rpr down nim w 25 NIM_PARENTREL
-------------------NIM_PARENTREL-------------------
-------------------NIM_HIERLIST--------------------
NIM AGT KON
L1_Total_AGT_A NA NA
L1_Total_KONZ_K NA NA
L2_AGT_A_A L1_Total_AGT_A NA
L2_AGT_B_A L1_Total_AGT_A NA
L2_AGT_C_A L1_Total_AGT_A NA
L2_KONZ_1_K NA L1_Total_KONZ_K
L2_KONZ_2_K NA L1_Total_KONZ_K
L3_100_A L2_AGT_A_A NA
L3_100_K NA L2_KONZ_1_K
L3_200_A L2_AGT_B_A NA
L3_200_K NA L2_KONZ_1_K
L3_300_A L2_AGT_C_A NA
L3_300_K NA L2_KONZ_2_K
L4_101_A L3_100_A NA
L4_101_K NA L3_100_K
L4_301_A L3_300_A NA
L4_301_K NA L3_300_K
L5_302_A L4_301_A NA
L5_302_K NA L4_301_K
100 L3_100_A L3_100_K
101 L4_101_A L4_101_K
102 L4_101_A L4_101_K
200 L3_200_A L3_200_K
201 L3_200_A L3_200_K
300 L3_300_A L3_300_K
301 L4_301_A L4_301_K
303 L5_302_A L5_302_K
304 L5_302_A L5_302_K
302 L5_302_A L5_302_K-----
We are using the latest Version of AWM: Version 11.2.0.1.0A
Database:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
"CORE 11.2.0.1.0 Production"
TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
Thank you verry much for any help.11.2.0.2 for AIX was announced in October 2010. See DOC ID 1249584.1
What is being announced?
We are pleased announce the October 19, 2010 release of Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Patchset 1 (11.2.0.2) on HP-UX > Itanium and IBM AIX on POWER Systems.Patchset 10098816
Description 11.2.0.2.0 PATCH SET FOR ORACLE DATABASE SERVER
Product Oracle Database Family
I have looked, but I cannot find a formal bug for this problem. My hunch is that it was fixed as a side effect of other changes, and I know there were several in this area. My simple test case did work in 11.2.0.2, so I hope it is all fixed. But feel free to enter an SR if you want. (If you mention my name in the SR then support should contact me.) You should certainly do this if moving on to 11.2.0.2 does not resolve the issue. -
Hi Friends,
There is one issue reg. Project Based MRP Run as below :
We are running MRP through MD51 (Project based MRP run). For this we are assigning FG material code under respective WBS Element which generates Network reservation with movement type 281Q which is base of MRP run in MD51. After MRP run we get planned order generation and then convert it to Production order and execute Production Order to receive Project Stock after GR.
After receiving Project stock and then selling it through Post Goods Issue through SD cycle, project stock is consumed but network reservation is not getting closed which results in again generation of planned order if MRP is run again.
I need your valuable inputs if we are missing any configuration setting which can set Final issue indicator in reservation while Posting Goods Issue (PGI) in SD because FI indicator checking will only ensure reservation doesnu2019t take part in planning again.
Your earliest reply will be highly appreaciated.
Regards,
TejasHi Vivek,
Thanks for your reply. Actually my issue has got resolved the way suggested by Mario Adler.
Hi Mario,
Thanks for your solution. PGI through Project is working fine for me.
Hi Krishna,
Follow the procedure as suggested by Mario which will resolve your issue.
Once again thank you all for spending your precious time to respond my query.
Regards,
Tejas
Maybe you are looking for
-
IPod touch 1g not charging properly with car charger
I have a 1g iPod touch I'm using it with a Kensington 33199 fm transmitter/car charger. The iPod does not recognize the car charger power to put it into charge mode. The battery symbol does not change to a charging symbol...the unit does play audio o
-
Third party Stock Transport Order
Hi, We have a requirement as descibed below: Plants A, B and C are live in SAP and belong to different company codes. The Plant B is the sales office and no production/purchasing happens at this plant. The vendor codes for Plant A & B with respective
-
Where is the file management utility on my HP Pavilion dv5-1150us Entertainment notebook pc?
I am trying to hookup a WD My Passport Ultra 2TB external drive for backup on my notebook. It tells me to check the file management utility to see if the WD File Setup is listed. How do I go to and find that utility?
-
How to transfer iTunes from laptop (windows XPERIA ) to new which is windows 7
-
How to create a separate new arrays for each loop
I have a question about creating new arrays. For example : In my for loop, the initial value is 1 and the final value is 4 and each iteration increment by 1, meaning that in this case i have 4 iterations. At the same time, i want to create 4 separa