Value based partitions

I have two tables - customers whose name begins with A to N and another that contains customers whose name begins with M to Z
I imported the table into the physical layer and joined them both to the orders table
I bought them into the logical model as two data sources for the customers table.
I set the Fragmentation content to customer.name < 'N' for CustAtoN and customer.name >= 'N' for CustMtoZ.
I set combine sources for both tables
In ANSWERS I queried
Customer whose name is between B and D - the log shows query only a to n table queried
Customer whose name is less than C - the log shows only a to n table queried
Customer whose name begins with D - the log shows both a to n and m to z tables queried
Anyone any ideas why this happens?
Edited by: Tim Armitage on Jan 18, 2011 10:59 PM
Edited by: Tim Armitage on Jan 18, 2011 11:00 PM

Hi Tim,
Do you have Dimensional created for these two tables? If yes, is your ROW_WID the lowest level of detail and it should be set as your level key
Specify this level in both the sources (1 fragment and 2 fragment) and also in the fact for these two tables (two fragments) at the detail level.
"This Source should be combined with other sources at this level" - Is this option checked for both the fragments? This option tells the BI Server that thess sources are fragments of the data at this level.
This should work. Try this. If it works, Pls award points.Thanks
~ Sarat Nallapati

Similar Messages

  • VALUE BASED  PARTITIONING BETWEEN AN EXCEL AND DATABASE

    Can any1 help I have an EXCEL FILES and DATABASE. I want to make partitioning value-based between these sources.
    Thanks you in advances.

    Hi,
    Actually value based partitioning works fine on the data sources which are stored on RDBMS. I haven't try it with a excel source. There is a detailed description in the link below.
    http://108obiee.blogspot.com/2009/01/fragmentation-in-obiee.html
    Hope this helps,
    Cheers.
    Cuneyt

  • Virtual column based partitioning

    Hi,
    we have a non-partitioned table in a production database and wish to partition it based on an expression. Since we are on 11.2 the first thing that comes to mind is virtual column based partitioning. The "problem" is that in order to partition by a virtual column, you have to create one, and adding a new column to a table could break any application that doesn't reference the existing columns by name, e.g. "SELECT *" or. "INSERT INTO table VALUES(....)".
    My question is: is it possible to somehow specify the expression on which to partition directly in the "partition by" clause rather than specifying it as a virtual column definition?
    Example:
    Instead of this..
    SQL> create table test (
      2    id             number not null,
      3    content        varchar2(10),
      4    record_type    varchar2(1) generated always as (case when (substr(content, 1, 1)='B' and not substr(content, 1, 3)='Bxy') then 'B' else 'A' end) virtual
      5  )
      6  partition by list(record_type)
      7  (
      8    partition partA values ('A'),
      9    partition partB values ('B')
    10  );
    Table created...I'd like to use something like this:
    SQL> create table test (
      2    id             number not null,
      3    content        varchar2(10)
      4  )
      5  partition by list((case when (substr(content, 1, 1)='B' and not substr(content, 1, 3)='Bxy') then 'B' else 'A' end))
      6  (
      7    partition partA values ('A'),
      8    partition partB values ('B')
      9  );
    partition by list((case when (substr(content, 1, 1)='B' and not substr(content, 1, 3)='Bxy') then 'B' else 'A' end))
    ERROR at line 5:
    ORA-00904: : invalid identifierThank you in advance for any answers.
    Regards,
    Jure

    adding a new column to a table could break any application that doesn't reference the existing columns by name, e.g. "SELECT *" or. "INSERT INTO table VALUES(....)". "Ok, i got it. You mean, in application you are using select * from yourtable; and those data is being used by a datagrid or any control, then where that application will show / handle the new column data right ?
    Yes, thats why DBA and developers do SDLC (Software Development Life Cycle); that our table will be looks like this, these will be columns, these will be their data types, these will be followed in naming convention, privileges, indexes, storage parameters, constraints, dependent objects etc. Now after creating the table, you found a need to add a column, it means there was some lapses happened at the design time/phase or business requirements are newly defined.
    So, as far as concerned of select * ... ; you have to change in the application by :
    select col1, col2, new_col from your table... (as per order of your datagrid control columns). There is no other solution, you have to change in application code at every place where you have used select * and if those statements are being merged / deals into a control)
    New column addition will hamper only at select * from... not with any INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE, because if they are running fine it means, they have well written column references. For DMLs you need not worry so far.
    By the way, what is your technology for application ? I have worked on couple of applications in ASP.NET with using datagrid which auto add/removes the columns in itself as per cursor result (not rememberring the exact property of it though)
    Regards
    Girish Sharma

  • Pre-compute for Value based dimensions in AWM 10g

    hi,
    I created a compressed partitioned MOLAP cube in OWB 10.2.0.3 based on some value based dimensions.
    I selected the hierarchy in value based dimensions for pre-compute, but it did display the hierarchy in OWB.
    I deployed the cube into Analytical workspace AWM 10g(10.2.0.3A).It created PRECOMPUTE(NA) in the relation statement for the value based dimensions.
    Is it that value based dimensions cannot be pre-computed (at the heirarchy) in AWM 10g ?
    Regards
    Chakri

    For reference, I believe this error was due to the deletion and recreation of a standard form AW formula without full restoration of the formula's PROPERTY values. AWXML (and hence 10g OWB/AWM) will not work correctly if you remove PROPERTY values from objects.

  • Can we precompute a value based dimension ?

    Hi,
    I do not know how to precompute/summarize a value based dimension in AWM 10g.
    One of my value based dimension in AWM 10 g (10.2.0.3A) showed pre-compute already done , but the aggmap of the cube did not show any precompute clause in relation statement for this dimension.
    1) Is AWM 10.2.0.3 A taking care of this internally ? How can i verify this ?
    2) If not, how can i set pre-compute for a value based dimension by hand ?
    (provided the precompute clause remains even after cube is maintained).
    Regards
    Chakri

    Hi All,
    Thanks for your replies.
    Let me give you a background . Iam creating a cube over some value based dimensions in OWB (10.2.0.3) and then deploying them to AW .Iam loading the cube and dimensions using OWB mappings.
    Any other changes or objects not possible through OWB are done directly in AWM (10.2.0.3A)
    Stuart,
    Yes this a duplicate thread i posted for almost the same problem statement.
    David,
    1st option - precompute valueset is defaulting to all members.
    a) Are you talking about the valueset <DIMENSION>_PARENTREL(<VSET>)
    I did an rpr on <VSET> , it just returned the hierarchy name. This vset would be there for any dimension ( even without precompute) and would just return the default heirarchy
    b) or Are you referring to PRECOMPUTE(<VSET>).
    As mentioned, this VSET is not coming up in the aggmap.
    2nd option - Modify the XML template with the PreComputeClause to say Expressiontype="INCLUDE" instead of "EXCLUDE". You can then delete the cube and recreate it from your XML.
    The Model view of AWM (10.2.0.3A) was showing the 'All' box as checked for this value based dimension, but the aggmap did not show any PRECOMPUTE clause. Also, when i checked the XML of the cube (in which the dimension is used), there was no pre-compute clause for only this dimension. This might be due to my AWM version iam using.What is your AWM version ?
    How do i check if pre-compute is working ?
    Here is the info about my cube :
    Dimensions : TIME (Levels: Year,Quarter,Month) ,LOB,CUST and FIN
    All dimension except TIME are value based.
    Settings : compressed, partitioned along TIME.MONTH
    I want to fully precompute TIME and LOB .
    CUST and FIN should not be precomputed.
    Thanks
    Chakri

  • Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)

    Dear all,
    There is this field in mateial master called "Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)" in accounting view 1,
    1 - May I know what is this field about (in between our company using material ledger).
    2 - May I know why the value of this field are different between our company period 6 and period 7 for this year? what contribute to it? and is it something wrong with different value between two different period or absolutely normal?
    Thanks.
    Tuff

    Dear all,
    Does anyone know my question?
    Thanks,
    tuff

  • Value based on the periodic unit price(only with pr.ctrl S) field in MatMas

    Dear all,
    There is this field in mateial master called "Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)" in accounting view 1,
    1 - May I know what is this field about (in between our company using material ledger).
    2 - May I know why the value of this field are different between our company period 6 and period 7 for this year? what contribute to it? and is it something wrong with different value between two different period or absolutely normal?
    Thanks.
    Tuff

    Hi Tuffy,
    For your 1st query:
    PUP field in Accounting 1 (if ML is active, Price Determination indicator=3) is the result of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) closing entry.
    For your 2nd query:
    In most of the cases the values will be different in Previous Period and Current Period. e.g.Period 6 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 6 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 5). Period 7 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 7 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 6).
    The reason for the different values: Price differences, Exchange rate differences, Price/Exchange rate differences from Low lower materials, etc.
    Thanks & Regards,
    ADI

  • Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S) field in mat.

    Dear all,
    There is this field in mateial master called "Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)" in accounting view 1,
    1 - May I know what is this field about (in between our company using material ledger).
    2 - May I know why the value of this field are different between our company period 6 and period 7 for this year? what contribute to it? and is it something wrong with different value between two different period or absolutely normal?
    Thanks.
    Tuff

    Hi Tuffy,
    For your 1st query:
    PUP field in Accounting 1 (if ML is active, Price Determination indicator=3) is the result of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) closing entry.
    For your 2nd query:
    In most of the cases the values will be different in Previous Period and Current Period. e.g.Period 6 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 6 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 5). Period 7 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 7 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 6).
    The reason for the different values: Price differences, Exchange rate differences, Price/Exchange rate differences from Low lower materials, etc.
    Thanks & Regards,
    ADI

  • Preaggregation across value based hierarchy dimension in 11g

    Hi All,
    I have created a cube with 6 dimensions in olap 11g. One of those six dimensions has only one hierarchy which is value based hierarchy. I have chosen level based aggregation as I know at what levels exactly users are going to query. When I was going through the dimensions to choose levels to preaggregate I noticed there were no options available for my value based hierarchy dimension ( I could see "all" option for the same case in 10g) then I tried to look for definitions of underlying objects just to make sure it will preaggregate data across my value based hierarchy dimension.
    I found value set corresponding to my value based hierarchy dimension in <CUBE NAME>SOLVEAGGMAP object , which AWM uses to decide which dimension values to preaggregate but if I do rpr on that value set (rp r<CUBE NAME>SOLVE<DIMENSION NAME>_PVSET) it shows NA so my question is can I pre aggregate across value based hierarchy dimension in olap 11g?
    Olap Version: 11.2.0.1
    AWM version: 11.2.0.1
    Thanks

    Even if you know exactly which levels your users will query, percent based precompute (e.g. 30%) may still be faster in practice because queries are returned using 'sparse looping' instead of 'dense looping'. This was the single biggest performance advantage of 11g over 10g.
    But if you still want to use level based precompute, then you should look at the XML template for the cube (as saved by AWM, for example). In it you should find something called PrecomputeCondition. This defines the set of members that are precomputed. Here is an example I just created using the GLOBAL schema
    <PrecomputeCondition>
    <![CDATA[
      "TIME" LEVELS ("TIME"."MONTH", "TIME".CALENDAR_QUARTER, "TIME".CALENDAR_YEAR),
      CHANNEL LEVELS (CHANNEL.TOTAL_CHANNEL, CHANNEL.CHANNEL),
      CUSTOMER LEVELS (CUSTOMER.MARKET_SEGMENT, CUSTOMER.REGION, CUSTOMER.SHIP_TO),
      PRODUCT LEVELS (PRODUCT.CLASS, PRODUCT.FAMILY, PRODUCT.ITEM)]]>
    </PrecomputeCondition>The PrecomputeCondition is also visible through the USER_CUBES view.
    SELECT PRECOMPUTE_CONDITION
    FROM USER_CUBES
    WHERE CUBE_NAME = 'MY_CUBE';You can hand modify this condition in the XML to specify an alternative 'non level based' precompute condition for any dimension. For example, if you define an attribute named 'SHOULD_PRECOMPUTE' on your PRODUCT dimension that is 1 for members to be precomputed and 0 for all others, then you can change the condition as follows.
    <PrecomputeCondition>
    <![CDATA[
      "TIME" LEVELS ("TIME"."MONTH", "TIME".CALENDAR_QUARTER, "TIME".CALENDAR_YEAR),
      CHANNEL LEVELS (CHANNEL.TOTAL_CHANNEL, CHANNEL.CHANNEL),
      CUSTOMER LEVELS (CUSTOMER.MARKET_SEGMENT, CUSTOMER.REGION, CUSTOMER.SHIP_TO),
      PRODUCT WHERE PRODUCT.SHOULD_PRECOMPUTE = 1]]>
    </PrecomputeCondition>If you recreate the cube from the XML with this condition, then the PVSET valueset you discovered should contain all dimension members for which the attribute value is 1.   This gives you complete control over what is precomputed.   Note that AWM doesn't support this form of condition, so it won't show up if you go to the Precompute tab, but it is valid for the server.  The PL/SQL below will modify the PrecomputeCondition (for the cube named MYCUBE) without going through AWM.
    begin
      dbms_cube.import_xml(q'!
    <Metadata
      Version="1.3"
      MinimumDatabaseVersion="11.2.0.2">
      <Cube Name="MY_CUBE">
        <Organization>
          <AWCubeOrganization>
            <PrecomputeCondition>
              <![CDATA[
               "TIME" LEVELS ("TIME"."MONTH","TIME".CALENDAR_QUARTER, "TIME".CALENDAR_YEAR),
               CHANNEL LEVELS (CHANNEL.TOTAL_CHANNEL,CHANNEL.CHANNEL),
               CUSTOMER LEVELS (CUSTOMER.MARKET_SEGMENT,CUSTOMER.REGION,CUSTOMER.SHIP_TO),
               PRODUCT WHERE PRODUCT.SHOULD_PRECOMPUTE = 1]]>
            </PrecomputeCondition>
          </AWCubeOrganization>
        </Organization>
      </Cube>
    </Metadata>
    end;
    /

  • Value based hierarchy 11g question

    Hi,
    in my BMM i've created a level based hierarchy composed of two levels: TOTAL and Audiologist
    Total level is setted as Grand Total level and doesn't have logical columns.
    At audiologist level insted i drag and drop two logical columns: Audiologist Code and Audiologist Name
    Then i created two keys.
    First Key: Audiologist Code - Use to display: None
    Second Key: Audiologist Code and Audiologist Name - Use to display : YES
    Graphically my hierarchy is as follow:
    Total-----
    Audiologist
    Audiologist Code
    Audiologist Name
    Now i would like that if i drill down Total appear simultaneously two columns: Audiologist Code and Audiologist Name.
    Is it possible? I remember that in 10 it was.
    It's quite urgent.
    Thanks

    Based on my experience of OWB10gR2 the option to create a "Value Based" hierarchy is only enabled if you create an AW based OLAP model. If you want to create a ROLAP model then I do not think this is possible.
    Question is why create a ROLAP model when you could get better performance and more powerful analytical features by using a multidimensional model within an analytic workspace.
    Keith

  • How to get ATINN value based on material number and Class Type ?

    I have below SELECT stmt code which gives the correct value of atwrt based on materil no and ATINN.
    However in quality system, it is failing because in quality system "atinn" value is not 0000000381. It is different.
    So how can I get ATINN(Internal characteristic) value based on material number and Class Type?
    -Obtain the batch characterstic value for the Material******************
      SELECT atwrt
        UP TO 1 ROWS
        INTO v_charvalue
        FROM ausp
       WHERE objek = mcha-matnr
         AND atinn = '0000000381'   " 'US80_FRENCH_ON_LABEL'
         AND klart = '001'.
    THANKS N ADVANCE.

    Hi SAm,
    use the Below function module to get the Atinn for Atwrt for thr Class and MAterial combination..
    CALL FUNCTION 'CLAF_CLASSIFICATION_OF_OBJECTS'
          EXPORTING
            classtype          = '023'       "Class type
            object             = w_object  "Material number with Leading zeros
            no_value_descript  = 'X'      "Default X
            objecttable        = 'MCH1'    "Table name Mara or MCH1 or MARC
          TABLES
            t_class            = t_class   "It return the Batch class available for the above combination
            t_objectdata       = t_char  "Return Batch characteristics(ATWRT) and their value ATINN in this table
          EXCEPTIONS
            no_classification  = 1
            no_classtypes      = 2
            invalid_class_type = 3
            OTHERS             = 4.
    Regards,
    Prabhudas

  • Problem in populating lookup values based on the lookup query from database

    HI all
    I have problem of population look-up values based on look-up query
    I am giving the details what i am trying
    I need to populate the values from the UD_LDAP_USR table into the field of UD_USRGRPC_NisNetTriple of type lookup
    i planned to set the properties of lookup as like this
    look up query as select UD_LDAP_USR_COMMON_NAME as NisNetTriple from UD_LDAP_USR
    ColumnNames as UD_LDAP_USR_COMMON_NAME
    Column captions as UD_LDAP_USR_COMMON_NAME
    Column width as 30
    Lookup Column Name as UD_LDAP_USR_COMMON_NAME
    But when i try to add ColumnName as wht i mentioned above i m getting invalid property exception,update failed
    I am not sure about that are we able to use other Connector table prefix with UD into the another processFrom
    Let me give update on this issue
    Urgent,struck my work here
    thanks
    Nagaraj

    Thanks for the reply raghav
    I tried but it was not working
    I gave like what u specified but no use
    It is throwing exception like set look-up query for the field
    Any one help me out on this issue
    Edited by: Nagaraju Chowdary on Jan 21, 2013 3:41 AM
    Edited by: Nagaraju Chowdary on Jan 21, 2013 3:42 AM

  • Parent-child hierarchy (Value based hierarchy)

    As anyone created a parent-child hierarchy using Oracle Warehouse Builder or Analytic Workspace Manager. I am using Oracle 10g Rel2 (and AWM) and OWB 10g Rel2.
    The values in the dimension table defines the hierarchy.
    I don't see an option of creating a value-based hierarchy in OWB though it is mentioned that it supports this particular hierarchy.
    In AWM, I am able to create the hierarchy but when I try to view the data in the dimension it gives an error BIB-9531 Invalid hierarchy specified.
    Can you please let me know if I am missing something.
    Thanks a lot in advance!
    Regards,
    Maruthi

    I've done some work with this, and it hasn't been easy going. There is no built-in ability to form a hierarchy of measure columns, at least nothing that can be predefined as the drill for a fact column. For example: I have 220 details of expense that have an exact arrangement with 5 levels and subtotals. Besides the expense detail there are say 4 dimensions, so the expense detail would be the 5th dimension. I have both arrangements in my rpd: 4D and 5D. They can be used together or separately. The 4D basically has 1000's of measures and there is no relationship between them besides the display arrangement in Answers. The 5D has a 5 column dimension that can drill the expense column from Total_Expense down to the 220 rows of detail expense.

  • Value based hierarchy (parent-child)

    Does anybody have any experience in modeling a parent-child dimension ( value based hierarchy instead of level based ) in OBIEE?
    Swapan.

    I've done some work with this, and it hasn't been easy going. There is no built-in ability to form a hierarchy of measure columns, at least nothing that can be predefined as the drill for a fact column. For example: I have 220 details of expense that have an exact arrangement with 5 levels and subtotals. Besides the expense detail there are say 4 dimensions, so the expense detail would be the 5th dimension. I have both arrangements in my rpd: 4D and 5D. They can be used together or separately. The 4D basically has 1000's of measures and there is no relationship between them besides the display arrangement in Answers. The 5D has a 5 column dimension that can drill the expense column from Total_Expense down to the 220 rows of detail expense.

  • Value based Hierarchies

    Hello,
    Has anyone created a parent-child hierarchy using Oracle Warehouse Builder or Analytic Workspace Manager. I am using Oracle 10g Rel2 (and AWM) and OWB 10g Rel2.
    The values in the dimension table defines the hierarchy.
    I don't see an option of creating a value-based hierarchy in OWB though it is mentioned that it supports this particular hierarchy.
    In AWM, I am able to create the hierarchy but when I try to view the data in the dimension it gives an error BIB-9531 Invalid hierarchy specified.
    Can you please let me know if I am missing something.
    Thanks a lot in advance!
    Regards,
    Maruthi

    To create a value based hierarchy:
    define the storage as MOLAP, as a minimum create 2 attributes one for the dimension member (define as business in Identifier column), one for the parent member referenece (define as parent in Identifier column), the hierarchy will have no levels. If you add this dimension into a map, you should have a mapping port for both the dimension member and the parent reference. The dimension will use 'Use natural keys from data source'.
    There is an expert for simplifying some of this, not sure on when it will be made available on OTN, it drives the creation of the dimensional objects from tables/views etc..

Maybe you are looking for

  • Generic Repository class to download BSP into Ms-excel

    Hi, we have developed the download utility for BSP-MVC application, we have many BSP-MVC applications so i have to  develop a generic Repository class to download BSP into ms-excel, which is usable for all, the data selection will be done from model

  • IOS5 - Erratic Notification centre behaviour on iPad 1 when displaying calendar entries

    Anyone else having an issue when enabling Calendar events to be displayed in the notification centre - where the notification centre scrolls up and down, adding and deleting entries constantly? (as if it's in a loop from ****)

  • Why is ByteBuffer crashing?

    hi, i have a program where i want to write to a bunch of bytes, in small groups, to a ByteBuffer of a specific size. Once that ByteBuffer reaches 50K bytes I want to write that whole thing to a file as a ZipEntry. I have allocated the ByteBuffer and

  • From personnel number to person number

    Hi, I do have user name and personnel number of an employee. How can I get the person number of this employee as it is used in address data, for example table ADR6? What's the link between personnel number and person number/address number? Regards, R

  • How can find a Php Version?

    Anybody know, how can PHP version find & how can change version, my php is given below <?php     $pafor=ucfirst($_REQUEST["pafor"]);           $job_code=ucfirst($_REQUEST["job_code"]);     $basic_graduation=ucfirst($_REQUEST["basic_graduation"]);