Value mismatch in ME23N and MIRO for PO with multiple account assignments

Hello All,
I've a PO for indriect material procurement with no material master and I've a single PO item with Account Assignment Category as "K" (Cost Center) and Net Price as "1,357.91". Account Assignment has been distributed by percentage such that 50% goes to a cost center and the remaining 50% goes to another cost center.
When I do MIRO, the amount comes as "1.357,92". This is because, the actual PO price "1,357.91" is divided by 2 equal half due to multiple account assignment and the individual amount comes to 678.955. And this is rounded off to 678.96 and multiplied by 2 in MIRO and the final amount comes to "1357.92". So as you see, the variance between PO price and MIRO price is 0.01.
How to get rid of this variance? Can something be done to match the PO value and MIRO value the same?
Thanks for your inputs.
Sankar

HI Sankar,
This is a standard behaviour as Currencies with 2 decimals will be getting rounded off. One work around to avoid posting of Small differences in Invoices (DIF accounts) is to maually change the amount in the Account assignment in the Invoice line to match to PO line total.
Regards,
Kathir

Similar Messages

  • Non valuated Goods Receipt for materials with multiple account assignments

    We have been using multiple a/c assignments for services on purchase orders for sometime with no issues.  Recently we used a multiple a/c assignment distribution for a material P/O.  this didn't work the same and the Goods Receipt was set as non valuated.
    This leaves the cost showing as a commitment and we do not get any actual costs charged at the GR point until we get and post the invoice.  This only happens with multiple account assignments, all material P/O goods receipts for single assignments get valuated.
    Were not sure why this happens, and want it treated the same.  Is there any way we can get these valuated the same way single assignment materials or multi assignment services are.
    The non valuated GR flag is getting set automatically, but we can't see where this is coming from for this scenario, so were a bit stuck.
    Any advice/direction would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Graham

    Hi Deshamol, No the materials are all valuated, as mentioned, they all work fine when used as single a/c assignment.
    Anupam, Your answer doesn't make sense to me, this is 1 line on the P/O, therefore 1 material.  It can't be both valuated and none valuated for each a/c assignment. 
    I have read in a note there there is a business function that you can apply to get this working, has anybody tried it?
    Thanks
    Graham

  • PC WF - Agent Determination for Items with Multiple Account Assignment

    Hello Gurus!
    The quoted text below is from [SAP Help Documentation|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/en/ad/d8fd25beb64bbe9d671f3199eb7edf/content.htm]. I haven't been able to find any further documentation on how to implement this feature. Is this something the system can do without any BAdI implementations? Has anybody implemented this? How can this be accomplished? We are on SRM 7.0.
    "You can distribute costs across accounts by percentage, by quantity, or by value. If the responsibility for approving items according to given accounting data is divided between several approvers, the system can create one work item for each approver. The item can only receive the status Approved after each approver has approved it. As soon as one approver rejects an item, the item receives the status Rejected."
    Regards,
    Ramki.

    Hi,
       SAP does not provide the standard Badi implementation to achieve your business requirement.. but you can refer enhancement implementation /SAPSRM/BD_WF_AGENTS_SC where you can find badi implementation /SAPSRM/BD_WF_SC_RR_PGRP is similar..
    Saravanan

  • Service PO - Multiple account assignments for service line items

    Hi All,
    I'm trying to create a service purchase order using BAPI 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'.
    But i need to create service line items with multiple account assignments say
    For line item 10 -
    1)Service line 1 -Cost center 'XYZ'.
    2)Service line 2 -Cost center 'ABC'.
    In POACCOUNT there is no option to specify the service line item .
    Moreover in POSERVICES also there is no option to mention costcenter.
    How can i create the same...
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Prasanthi

    Dear Prithviraj,
    CAPEX (Category 'A'), can it apply to OPEX/Blanket and Sm. Proj?
    I know create multiple account assigment under ME51N/ME52N.
    Any solution by using FM (BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE and  BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE)?
    thanks
    Regards,
    Weng

  • Even I cant believe this is happening again! i'm once again asking for help with my account.  Since im very sick I ask that u look into my account and read the hell verizon has put me through and assist ending the hell once and for all even if that means

    Even I cant believe this is happening again! i'm once again asking for help with my account.  Since im very sick I ask that u look into my account and read the hell verizon has put me through and assist ending the hell once and for all even if that means ending my contract, i just want the hell over. I went into my bill tonight and the mess was still there I paid $110. that's what I owe

    I guess I spoke too soon!  I really can't believe this nightmare is not over yet! My account is still wrong.  The credit that I was due totaled $63.00  I am looking at a message on my phone saying that $21.01 was credited which makes my balance $219.72.  I received a text the following day that says, I processed your credit of $30.00 and your new balance $216.73 how is that possible?  None of the late fees were credited and the amount due for my monthly charges are wrong.  Before any changes were made to my data plan back in Nov. My monthly charges were $140.00, I needed my hot spot back and i was told that the hot spot will increase my bill $10 for each phone that totals $20.  The customer rep that change my data plan at that time also gave me a credit of $20 to compensate for the increase until I had time to talk with customer service about the mix-up with my Hot spot. I originally had the hot spot, but the rep that change my plan almost a year prior told me nothing was changing except I was getting more for less money.  I explained to that rep that I need my hot spot 4 times a year...and I don't want my plan to have any changes. To verify what I'm telling u check my account and see that I called from Albany New York wanting to know where my hot spot was and I was told I didn't have the hot spot on my account since the last data change!  I lost money once again due to the verizon rep's.  so my current data plan the rep promised would increase $20 which makes my monthly charges that were $140 prior to the change $160 after the hot spot was returned to my account.  Then I was given a $12 credit per month for 12 months because of so many mistakes made to my account so with that $12 credit my monthly charges should $148 + surcharges + taxes and that's not what I see. I do know this much right now my account is in such a shambles I can hardly see the light at the end if there is an end!  I need real help!
    >> Personal information removed by Verizon Moderator to comply with the Verizon Wireless Terms of Service <<

  • Can bookmarks be protable for multiple computers? Is it an option to log on and use my bookmarks with multiple computers and locations? Thanks

    Can bookmarks be protable for multiple computers? Is it an option to log on and use my bookmarks with multiple computers and locations? Thanks

    Profile is a folder which store all your personal data in a safe place
    * https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Profiles
    You can use this button to go to the current Firefox profile folder:
    * Help > Troubleshooting Information > Profile Directory: Open Containing Folder
    here explain how to backup profile
    * https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Backing%20up%20your%20information
    Here explain how to restore it
    *https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Recovering%20important%20data%20from%20an%20old%20profile

  • Hi we setup ISE in our lab and planning for prodution with 2000 user endpoints. We have SNS appliance but confused with ISE lice

    Hi we setup ISE in our lab and planning for prodution with 2000 user endpoints. We have SNS appliance but confused with ISE license bt plus and advanced..Please advise.

    Plus:
        Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)
        Profiling
        Endpoint Protection Service (EPS)
        TrustSec SGT
    Advanced :
        Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)
        Profiling
        Endpoint Protection Service (EPS)
        TrustSec SGT
        Mobile Device Manager (MDM)
        Health Compliance and Remediation
        Posture
    Base license is Perpetual

  • I have MacBook Pro Retina, but dint get pages, numbers and keynote for free with it, but others did. What to do?

    I have MacBook Pro Retina, but dint get pages, numbers and keynote for free with it, but others did. What to do?

    Solved the problem- I contacted apple on their support line found on this page... http://www.apple.com/uk/support/mac/ and they were really helpful and talked me through what to do on the phone, I now have all three productivity apps. Hope this helps

  • Partial goods receipt for PO with multiple line items

    Hello All,
    While doing MIGO, for a PO with multiple line items, if one line item is having error, will we be able to go ahead with goods receipt? Or entire material document is blocked for doing MIGO?
    We will be doing a development - in case if there is problem in goods receipt (checking of any parameter, and if it is missing - we will be posting error message)...is it possible to ahead with next line item and still post the material document?
    If partial goods receipt if possible for PO with multiple line items, how do we do it?
    Regards,
    RJS

    Hi
    While doing MIGO, for a PO with multiple line items, if one line item is having error, will we be able to go ahead with goods receipt? Or entire material document is blocked for doing MIGO?
    No. You cannot post the MIGO, if even one of the PO line item is having problem or giving error.
    We will be doing a development - in case if there is problem in goods receipt (checking of any parameter, and if it is missing - we will be posting error message)...is it possible to ahead with next line item and still post the material document?
    If you skip a line irem and do GR with next line item, how will you match quantity & value with the vendor Invoice at LIV ?
    If partial goods receipt if possible for PO with multiple line items, how do we do it?
    Partial goods receipt is possible for PO line items. That means, if PO has 100 qty for line item 1 then you can do GR for 50 now and 50 later depending on the vendors delivery.
    Hope this is what you mean by "Partial Goods Receipt".
    Edited by: Arun R on May 10, 2010 2:03 PM

  • Parked MM invoice and multiple account assignments (table RBCO) ?

    Hi.
    Could someone please explain how the table RBCO works for parked MM invoice and multiple account assignments.
    What I have observed in this table are:
    1. Every position (table RSEG)  in the invoice can have several lines (table RBCO) with account assignment.
    2, If there is only one record for a position, the key in the table RBCO starts with 0002, field RBCO-COBL_NR (???)
    3. IF I add one more line to the psoition, the first line CHANGES the key in table RBCO from 0002 to 0001 and the second line gets RBCO-COBL_NR = 0002
    4. The third line gets 0003.
    5. If i delete line 1-2, the remaining one line gets a new key feild RBCO-COBL_NR = 0002.
    The reason for understanding how this works is that i need to make a Z-table storing the history of changes done to records in table RBCO (..don’t ask why...)
    Lest say, I make a change for in an invoice for one of the positions, how do I compare the values in the itab, YDRSEG[]-CO[]- with the lines in table RBCO ?
    And whats the logic for the key in table RBCO?
    Please advice, Tom

    -

  • Multiple Account Assignments for purchase/framework requisition

    Hi,
    Multiple Account Assignments for purchase/framework requisition:
    The actual MM configuration is a single account assignment in the purchase requisition (although the option of multiple account assignments exist for trips). What are the implications at GR posting? Assuming that we could use the option for quantity and percentage distribution.
    Regards
    Suresh

    Hi
    Multiple account assignment:
    <b>Specifying Multiple Account Assignment</b>
    This procedure allows you to apportion the costs associated with a PR/PO item (among several cost centers, for example).
    With multiple account assignment, the account assignment data entered takes the form of individual account assignment items.
    <b>Prerequisites</b>
    When specifying multiple account assignment for an item, you must consider the following points:
    1.How is the net value of a PO item to be distributed (apportioned) among the individual account assignment items?
    The costs can be allocated on a quantity or percentage basis (for example, 10 pieces or 10% of the order value to cost center 100).
    2.How are the costs to be apportioned if only a part of the ordered quantity has been delivered and invoiced?
    The partial invoice amount can be distributed proportionally, i.e. evenly, among the account assignment items of a purchase order.
    The partial invoice amount can be distributed on a "progressive fill-up" basis, i.e. the invoiced amount is allocated to the individual account assignment items one after the other. Only when account assignment item 1 has been charged in full is item 2 charged; only when account assignment item 2 has been charged is item 3 charged, and so on. This process continues until the total invoice value of the PO item is reached.
    <b>Procedure</b>
    1.When entering an item, specify the account assignment category for the desired item on the item overview screen.
    2.Choose Item -> Account assignments.
    The account assignment window appears.
    3.Enter the account assignment data for the first account assignment item.
    Choose Change display to call up the multiple account assignment screen.
    4.In the item fields (upper part of this screen) enter the relevant data:
    – Select the GR non-val. field to designate the GR for this item as non-valuated (as the item has been ordered for direct consumption).
    – In the Distribution field, specify whether the costs are to be apportioned on a quantity basis or by percentage.
    – In the Partial invoice field, specify whether the value of a partial invoice is to be allocated to individual account assignment items successively, whereby one is debited in full before a posting is made to another one (in which case, some account assignment items may not be debited at all as a result of a particular invoice), or whether the value of such a partial invoice is to be distributed among all account assignment items in equal portions.
    5.For each account assignment item, enter either the quantity or the percentage of the total value to be charged to the relevant account assignment item.
    To enter further items with the same account assignment data, choose Edit -> Repeat account assignment -> Switch on. The account assignment data will then be automatically adopted in the next item.
    6.Repeat as necessary for other items.
    7.Save the purchase order.
    A vendor submits an invoice for 60% of the total order value. The cost of the ordered goods is to be divided equally among cost centers 1 - 5 (that is, 20% of the total cost is to be borne by each).
    If you specified for the PO item that the value of a partial invoice is to be debited to the individual account assignment items on a "progressive fill-up" basis, cost centers 1 to 3 will each be debited with their full 20% share of the total cost on the basis of this partial invoice, whereas cost centers 4 and 5 will not be charged at all. (The latter two cost centers will not be debited until the remaining amount is invoiced.)
    Regards
    Ramakrishna

  • How to Restrict Single Delivery Date for PO with Multiple Line Items

    Dear Experts,
    How to Restrict Single Delivery Date for PO with Multiple Line Items.
    System needs to through Error Message if User Inputs Different Delivery Dates for PO with Multiple Line Items in ME21N Tcode.
    Can we achive this by Some Enhancement in SAP or Not ???
    If so how to do it.
    Any Inputs is highly appreciated.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Selvakumar. M

    Hi Selvakumar,
    we can resrict the PO to have a single delivery date in all the line items by means of giving a error message or overwiting the delivery date keyed/determined in the line item.
    You can use the BADI -> ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST. In which you need to implement the method PROCESS_SCHEDULE.
    (for technical aid - This method will be called for each and every PO line item, From the imporing parameter im_schedule we can get all the details of current PO line, even we can change the data in the current PO line. )
    Regards,
    Madhu.

  • Undeleting a PO line item with multiple account assignment and PO history

    I  am getting error message
    PO history already exists (Multiple account assignment not possible)
        Message no. MEPO841
    When attempting to undelete a purchase order line item that has GR (nonvaluated) and Invoice postings.
    Sequence of events.
    PO line item was created with mutlitple account assignments ( 50/50 distribution) and GR nonval flags on.
    Invoice Posted (blocked for payment)
    GR done
    PO line item marked for deletion.
    Now getting MEPO841 when attempting to undelete.
    Tried to Reverse GR and cancel material docuement - unable to do so - message no selectable items in PO
      (even with check zero indicator )

    Hello Dan ,
    Error message MEPO 841 is only issued if you have Multiple account assignment function (MAA) activated. Multiple account assignment function is a new business function developed in Release 604.
    If you have MAA active, you are not allowed to change a single account assigned PO which has GR posted to a multiple accounts assigned PO. If this is tried , MEPO 841 will stop you from doing this change.
    If you want to have your old functionality in the lower release, you should switch off the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 ( MM Multiple Account Assignment )  in Release 604.
    Please switch the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 off in test environment  and test the problem again in a productive system.
    I hope this information has been helpful in solving your problem. Please let me know if you have any further questions.
    Thank you.
    Best Regards,
    Frank Farinella

  • How do icloud and itunes match work with multiple libraries?

    How do icloud and itunes match work with multiple libraries?

    This forum is for troubleshooting compatibility issues between Macs and Windows, not iTunes. You'll probably want to repost your question in the iTunes discussions:
    http://discussions.apple.com/category.jspa?categoryID=150

  • Good day, I forgot to answer the security question for shopping with my account, how can I recover them?

    Good day, I forgot to answer the security question for shopping with my account, how can I recover them?

    1. See my User Tip for some help: Some Solutions for Resetting
        Forgotten Security Questions: Apple Support Communities.
    2. Here are two different but direct methods:
        a. Send Apple an email request at: Apple - Support - iTunes Store - Contact Us.
        b. Call Apple Support in your country: Customer Service: Contacting Apple for
            support and service.
    3. For other queries about Apple ID see Frequently asked questions about Apple ID.
    4. Rescue email address and how to reset Apple ID security questions
    5. For online assistance use Apple - Support - Express Lane

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem Starting ORBacus ORB from Weblogic on HP-UX 11

    I'm trying to use Weblogic startup classes to startup an ORBacus ORB. During the Weblogic startup process I receive the following error: Fri Jul 07 15:24:49 GMT+00:00 2000:<E> <WebLogicServer> Failed to invoke startup class timeserver=utils.Server ja

  • MRS  Auto Scheduling  Network Order

    Has any one in the forum implemented or know how to achieve Automatic Scheduling of Demand  (Network Order/ Network Activity ) created through PS (Project Systems) in the MRS tool. ?  Using Service Orders, this is a configurable item, with a BAdI for

  • Consumption failure in SAP for PO.

    Want to know the root cause of consumption failure in SAP for PO.Once GR was processed successfully, materials will be back flushed automatically in SAP. According to our findings, we found error message "insufficient materials at vendor to complete

  • Battery exchange program for iBook

    Hi, I ordered true the battery exchange program a new battery for my iBook 4G. I also got a confirmation emal from Apple that i reicive the batteru in 3 a 5 days. This was on 29 december 05 and still the battery isn't arived yet. Is this normal? than

  • I thought the NEW DVR's were supposed to be able to record more than 2 shows at 1 time

    I was told that the New DVR which is what i have, i guess its called a media center or something like that was supposed to record more than 2 shows simultaneously but found out last night that not to be true. I had 3 scheduled and 1 of them did not r