Value wrongly settled on AUC from WBS

Hello Experts
We are working on ECC 6.0.
We are using WBS to settle values on AUC & FA.
The issue is some values which were not to be capitalized have been wrongly settled on certain AUCs in previous FY 2009 (debit baalnce).
1. So is it possible to reverse the settlement of previous FY 2009 in current FY 2010?
2. If NO, then can we take out the values from AUC by some other way? I'd tried passing a FI entry using F-91 with posting key 75(credit) for AUC but system doesn't allow. Am i suppose to use some specific Transaction Types for AUC? However passing such manual entries are allowed for FA.
Please suggest.
Regards
Kapil

You have to reverse it and post again in 2009.
The differences in FI you can post with the transaction ABF1 (SAP note 69225) and reverse in 2010. The only point is that then on the end of the years AA is not in line with the values on your G/L account!

Similar Messages

Fields copied to AUC from WBS Element (when WBS Element is released)

Hi,
I would like to know what are the fields that are copied to AUC from WBS element (when WBS Element is released).
Regards,
Vivian

Hi Vivian,
menu path: Asset Accounting / Valuation / Determine Depreciation Areas in the Asset Class
Select there your asset under construction asset class.
Here you can fill in default values. (when you click on the fields you get more fields)
When you want to fill in other fields you can use a substitution ( Asset Accounting / Master Data / Define Substitution)
In our case, i think standard
The field description (WBS)
Req cost center (WBS)
Plant (WBS)
BA (WBS)

Error In allocation Structure when doing settlement to GL from WBS

Hi All,
I got this error message. What should i do? I try to check my allocation structure...but it seem correct.
Complete allocation structure Z3
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 901000 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z3, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element 901000 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure Z3

Hi Sreenivas ,
The accounting document looks weird :
Hi,
Settlement profile : ZPS001
GL, CC, Order, WBSE and FXA optional
Document type : SA (GL Account doc)
Distribution rule : 10
Residence time : 24
Allocation strucutre Z3
Default object type : FXA
tick on % settlement and equivalence no
to be settled in full
Allocation structure : Z3
Assignment : 1.Labour ,2.MAterial, 3. Subcontract
Source : 1. PSlabour , 2.PSmaterial 3. PSsubcon 4.Cost
Settlement cost center : FXA (ticl by CE), CTR (settlement cost element 90200) ; ORD (Settlement cost element 902001); GL put 747100f
I already successfully settle from WBS to GL 747100(settlement receiver) However, when i check FB03 it shows that
GL account 747100
Posting key 40
Amount 25000
GL Account 747100
Posting key 50
Amount -25000
What the problem ?
Cheers,
Nies

Unable to settle the AUC from investment measure

HI everyone,
The user has partially settled the AUC in the year 2008, and booked some amount again in 2009, and he has settled the costs in 2009 in full to FXA category, did not settle the auc in 2008, the auc in the year 2008 is still existing and the order has got locked.
I am trying to change the settlement rule, but it is not taking.
Pls help
Thanks in Advance
Sree

Hi,
Once you do business completion, it is meant that Order has been completed in all aspects, even in FI/CO aspects. So after that, you cant do settlement.
PM Order Business Completion
http://www.sap-img.com/plant/difference-between-pm-teco-business-completion.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/5b/ae39564b8611d182ba0000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regards,
Maheswaran.

Settle Secondary Cost from WBS to AUC

Hi Sapiens,
Business Requirement --> Budget Control for all Material Procurement, thereafter settlement of cost thus booked under WBS to AUC or Asset as the case maybe.
Current Setup --> Material/Inventory/Balance Sheet A/c has been made Statistical i.e. CE category "90". This is enabling AVAC during procurement and budget control. However when trying to settle the WBS it is NOT settling, error - "no cost available to settle".
How to resolve the matters.
Regards,
GM

Here is what SAP help says for cost element category 90:
90: Cost Elements for Balance Sheet Accounts in FI
Automatically assigned when you create cost elements in CO whose general ledger accounts in FI are asset reconciliation accounts (special balance sheet accounts), not income statement accounts. You cannot change this category in CO master data maintenance.
FI does not require CO account assignments to cost elements of category
90. However, if you enter an account assignment, it is only recorded statistically for true objects.
Category 90 cost elements enable you to check the budget of an order or project when you acquire fixed assets that can be directly capitalized. To do this, enter the capital investment order or the WBS element in the corresponding field of the asset master data. Asset Management (AM) ensures that the specified order or WBS element is automatically entered in the document during the asset acquisition.
In CO the order or WBS element is debited statistically. This statistical debiting is checked by the system using the budget during availability control.
Notice the words in bold above. Apparently, CE category 90 is when you acquire fixed assets that can be directly capitalized. You need to specify the WBS element in the corresponding asset master data.
I think your candidate is CE category 22.
22: External Settlement
Used to settle order costs, project costs, or cost object costs to objects outside of CO. These objects could be assets (Asset Management), materials (Materials Management), or general ledger accounts (Financial Accounting). The R/3 System creates an accounting document when the costs are settled.
Cost elements of this category cannot be used for settlement within CO (cost centers, orders, projects, and so on). Use secondary cost element category 21 for this purpose. The system does not create an accounting document when costs are settled within CO.

Error while Settlement to AUC from Project CJ88

Hi,
ECC 6.00/PSM-BCS
While settling the Project to AUC I am getting the below error. Please advice.
*Asset DAML 000009000004 0000: no subnumber with FM assignment CAPEX / /*
Message no. AW851
Diagnosis
During settlement of sender WBS DAMEPL 1.1.1.1 there was an attempt to settle a posting that has account assignment CAPEX / / (fund/functional area/grant) to an asset subnumber. However, the receiving asset DAML 000009000004 0000 does not have an asset subnumber with this assignment.
System Response
The posting on this sender cannot be settled to an asset subnumber.
Procedure
Either create an asset subnumber with account assignment CAPEX / / for asset DAML 000009000004 0000, or settle to a different receiver.
If this message appears as a warning only, then the posting from this sender is settled to the asset main number.
Fund Capex : CAPEX
Company Code : DAML
WBS Element : DAMEPL 1.1.1.1
Best Regards
Shekhar
Edited by: Chandrashekher Yellapragada on Jun 5, 2010 7:00 PM

I am facing the same error and find this OSS Note 440396 - Missing entries for configurable messages in IS-PS-FM where you can deactivate the error message.
Hope this will solve your issue too.
Regards,
OSS Note 440396
Symptom
System issues messages AW851,AW852,AW856 or AW857 as Error even though
functionality exists to make these configurable.
Other terms
LAIMBFM1, OBA5, AW, AW851, AW852, AW856, AW857
Reason and Prerequisites
Missing entries in tables.
Solution
Create Application Area for Customizable messages for 'AW' using transcation SM30 with view V_T100SA.
Next using transaction SM34, enter view cluster VC_T100S, click maintain and select Application Area AW and double click Messages. Add the following entries:
AppArea     No. Allowed Values     Std     Switch off
AW     851    EWI     E          X
AW     852    EWI     E          X
AW     856    EWI     E          X
AW     857    EWI     E          X
Afterwards with Transaction OBA5 insert the entries for the messages you want to customize, and set them to the error level the behaviour should be for your particular case.

WBS element is updated while settling cost from WBS to AUC

Hi Experts
At the time of settlement , when we settling the cost from WBS to AUC , WBS element is updated in AUC line item of accounting document , but it should not be updated actually.
As result AUC cost is loaded on WBS and budget of WBS is get affected , furthermore system is not allowing for MIGO even budget is available but in CJ30 it is showing assigned value is more then original budget.
Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards
shailesh

Hi Saurabh ,
I totally agree with you , but in our case system is not allowing(Error Message: Budget Exceeded) MIGO against capex PO - > WBS.
Note : in our case , system is checking budget at the time of MIGO also.
in our case , report S_ALR_87013558 is showing wrong actual value and also in CJ30 , total assigned value is larger then total distributable budget , As result our available budget gets negative figure in report S_ALR_87013558 , even i have already run CJEN->CJBN 2 or 3 times.
Note: Our Commitment value is correct.
Actually , according to report S_ALR_87013542 , system is showing correct actual value , that means we have sufficient available budget for further MIGO's
Now may be , due to WBS element is updated in AUC line item of accouning document of settlement (WBS to AUC) , system loads AUC values to WBS unnecessarily , our available budget gets negative figure.
For your reference , i am attaching screen shot of accounting document which is generated at the time of settlement from WBS to AUC.

Secondary costs from WBS to an AuC

Hi,
1. I have executed Assessment[KSU5] that actually settled costs from secondary cost element[800099] to a WBS element [AAA]
2. Now I am trying to settle costs [which is secondary] from WBS element [AAA] to an AuC using CJ88 and I am getting below error
3. Just for info in allocation structure Z1, I have given settlement cost element for WBS, but still I am getting below error
Any advises/ideas, thanks
Complete allocation structure Z1
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 800099 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element 800099 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure Z1
Regards,
Sri
Edited by: Sridhar Nagavarapu on Jul 4, 2008 12:45 AM
Edited by: Sridhar Nagavarapu on Jul 4, 2008 12:47 AM

Through MM, contract is created (ME31N) whereby the settlement G/L accounts are identified.
The contract then is released through MM with TCode ME21N which prompts Commitment Costs to be entered, after which the Service Entry Sheet SES through TCode ME81L which then automatically updates into the WBS.
Through WBS, CJ88 would be the TCode you would have to use for settlement.
Hope this helps.
Thanks.

WBS settlement to AuC

Hi,
Currently settlement postings from WBS to AuC happens to Depreciation Area 01 as well as Area A10
. But business want to restrict the postings to Area 10. How can we achieve this? Where is the relevant configuration?
Kindly help.
Thanks and Regards,
Ramesan

Capital Planning during AuC

Capital project WBS settle to AUC individually

Dear all experts,
please help me on the following issues.
i am working on a capital project. Investment profile is defined and assgined to the project profile.
the top WBS is T-09-001
the second level WBS are T-09-001-01, T-09-001-02, T-09-001-03, T-09-001-04, T-09-001-05 for example.
the third level WBS is T-09-001-05-01.
i do the test settlement when the project status is release. (i didn't maintain the settlement rule.)
the result is that every single WBS is settled to a FXA (the numbers are generated automatically)
for example
T-09-001-01 to FXA 1000/40047/0 30000CNY
T-09-001-02 to FXA 1000/40048/0 40000CNY
T-09-001-03 to FXA 1000/40049/0 40000CNY......
i am not sure if it is correct or not, because it's my first time to deal with capital projects.
if i want to settle all the sub-WBS to top WBS and the top one settled to AUC, how can i do it.
i manually maintain the settlement rule for all the sub-WBS to top WBS and settle the project again.
but the result is the same. i don't know where the problem is.
please tell me how to do it or how to settle the capital projects in most cases?
thanks a lot.
judy

Below was something which we had done in such case:
1. Created a substitution rule against the WBS element, if the level of WBS >=2 substitute the Investment profile with 'Blank'. With this when ever you create a project and save it or call the substitution from menu, system would retain the investment profile on level 1 WBS and when project is released only 1 AUC is created for the project which is on level 1 WBS.
2. Settle all other lower WBS to it's parent WBS and you can implement OSS note 211324 - CJB1: Strategy for settlement to superior WBS. Refer the below link about how this works:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/PLM/ModificationnoteforStrategyforsettlementtosuperiorWBS
Doing both the above, you would create only 1 AUC (on level 1 WBS) and finally settle all lower WBS to level 1 WBS and from there system would then automatically settle the costs to AUC fixed asset.
Regards
Sreenivas

Secondary cost from WBS to AUC

Hi All,
I am facing a problem in posting secondary costs from WBS to AUC.
In Project systems they are considering secondary costs from the activities in the network. i settled the cost from network to WBS. and when i tried to settle From wbs to AUC system is asking for settlement costelement for secondary cost. But the secondary cost should be settled to costcenter but not to AUC.
Please suggest how can we do the settlement from WBS to AUC. How to handle settlement of secondary costs in this scenario.
Any help will be greatly appriciated.
Rgds,
Kumar.

Through MM, contract is created (ME31N) whereby the settlement G/L accounts are identified.
The contract then is released through MM with TCode ME21N which prompts Commitment Costs to be entered, after which the Service Entry Sheet SES through TCode ME81L which then automatically updates into the WBS.
Through WBS, CJ88 would be the TCode you would have to use for settlement.
Hope this helps.
Thanks.

Validation settlement to AUC or FXA from PS (CJ88)

Hi All,
I have an issue when doing settlement from WBS to AUC/FXA.
Let say the project has a plant call ABCD, then i put settlement rule AUC or FXA..and doing settlement CJ88...but i could settle to AUC / FXA to different plant call CDEF . We decided not to use automatic AUC from IM, we create AUC and FXA from Asset module.
How to validate that Project plant ABCD only could settle to AUC or FXA which have same plant..
Cheers,
Nies

img-fi-spec purp ledger-tools-maintain validation/substitution rules - maintain substitution
substitution rule under financial acc -line items
create a substitution for doc type and get plant from WBS
for this use substitution by exit for plant UF101
Now write a program ZGGBS000 (config is in txn GCX2) to get plant from wherever you want

WBS settlement wiht AUC

Hello,
Can anybody help to do the configuration for wbs settlement with AUC other than below mentioned configuration.
1. New Asset class creation with line iteme settlement.
2. Allocaiton structure added settlement with FXA.
3. New settlement profile created with default object type FXA,document type AA and amount settlement check box activated.
but based on above mentioned configuration i am not moving forward, kindly suggest any more configuration need for this requirement.
Thanks for your advance help.
Regards,
Lakshmi.

Hi,
Please follow above mentioned points
Allocation structure added settlement with FXA. -- Path - SPRO - IMG - Investment Management - Projects as Investment Measures - Settlement -- Maintain Allocation Structures -create on Allocation structure - and assignment - 010 -- Material & service cost -- and select - click on - source - give Cost elements - from - to
and click on settlement cost element - give receiver category -- FXA - check box for By cost element -- and save it ,
2.Maintain Settlement Profiles -- Define Settlement Profile -- XX - WBSE Settlement Profile
    select radio button - to be settled in full , give allocated structure ,
     Default object type FXA Asset
     select all indicators -- and give other parameter -- Document type -- AA or as per requirement
     and Assign Settlement Profile to Project Profile
3.New Asset class creation with line items settlement     --   Investment Management -- Projects as Investment Measures -- Master Data --Assets under Construction --Define Asset Classes ==
      give- Account determination -- asset class , scr layout rule -- capital investment measure ,
give number range --whichever is created
status of AuC -- select radio button -- Investment Measure
Save it ,
Now you can create Project -   Run -- CJ88 for settlement
Thanking you
Regards
Mahesh

Error while doing settlement from WBS to P&L Account

Hello
I am trying to do a settlement from WBS to P&L Account(Expense account). In this case, "Dummy" Prof Ctr is getting derived from 0KE5 (we have maintained a dummy prof ctr). We have set the validations to disallow any postings/settlements to dummy prof ctr. Hence I am getting an error while doing settlement.
Now I am maintaning a Prof ctr in my WBS master data. I am unable to understand why system is deriving dummy prof ctr and not the one maintained on WBS master data. The settlements are working fine when I do them against Balance sheet accounts and proper prof ctr is getting derived, which is being maintained on WBS master data. I am getting trouble only while doing settlement to my P&lL i.e. expense accounts.
can anyone throw some light on this?
Thks
Sarang

Dear Sarang,
You have maintained profit center in WBS master which is not updated at the time settlement to FI that what makes you worried. If you are making FI posting and give WBS as an additional account assignment then Profit center in WBS master will be updated. Here in settlement WBS is sender not the receiver so that profit center will not be updated. In settlement receiver (any) is debited and sender (WBS) is credited so this credit entry will be updated in profit center.
To your second query that when you carry out settlement to balance sheet account right profit center is updated then please make sure, that balance sheet account is maintained in 3KEH with profit center or OKB9.
Your P&L account (expense) receives dummy profit center because it is not able to find cost center which can fetch profit center from the master. So, if you can afford, maintain that cost elements (expense account) with profit center in OKB9.
might help you..........................................................

AUC from Investment measure can't settle to the completed asset partially.

Dear.
I using IM module and AUC which made from Investment measure.
and I post cost to Investment order and settle to AUC periodically.
Some amount In nvestment order should be tranfer to the completed asset. so remained amount in that should be keep going on.
But, Investment order settlement rule only can be maintained by FULL settlement method.
It means, all amount that accumulated in Investment order must be settled.
What I want to do is the partial amount settle to the completed asset and remains left in investment order.
Of course, this investment order keep its function as collect the amount of AUC.
How can It be?

Hi,
Use KOB5 - Give the settlement rule - mention the required amount and asset code
Use KO88 and settle the asset by selecting Settlement Type - Partial Settlement
Regards,
Muralidhar

Value wrongly settled on AUC from WBS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for