Vat amoutn posted wrongly

hi gur's
Customer invoice was posted correctly by using the inr rupees.
but the problem is In the middle of the invoice, an additional line is printed with the VAT calculated in USD.
This is for the customer information, but it seems that the calculation factor is wrong.
On invoice xxxxxxx the vat is calculated 36.484,23e usd but should be something like 364,8423 usd.
value points assigned
regards
ram

hi sri,
the problem is not with tax code the invoice is calculated tax properly, for customer info the vat details will be printed but its printed wrogly.
it suppose to pront 333,666 but printed like 3.336,66
hope its clear if not please ask me more info
regards
ram

Similar Messages

Data is posting wrongly in Idoc

Hi all,
We are facing issues with data is posting wrongly in File to Idoc scenario. When we test this scenario everything shows success in XI but in R/3 idoc generating with 64 status and data is not posting correctly. Suppose our second field if we send more than 20 length it is trimming upto 20 only. If we change offset to take 40 length to second field again it is taking 20 legth of sceond field and rest of third field values. As i have been checked with Abapper they were saying like whatever data we are sending to R/3 it will be coming as a single structure(Sdata) . But i have been checked outbound XML also in that everything shows fine. Is there anything problem in Xi . I have been re-imported idoc in XI also and it is equipment master Idoc. They have been used offset also still no use. My doubt is why from second field on wards data is posting worngly.They have used structure sdata.
Example:
Suppose, Outbound XML in XI:
<Idoc>
<Field1>abc
<Field2>4364255166110335211
<Field3>Computer
<Field4>Laptop
<Field5>sdas
<Idoc>
Idoc in R/3:
Field1:abc
Field2:43642551661 Computer Laptop
Field3: sdas
Field4:
Field5:
Could anybody help me on this. Why is data wrongly posting here...
Rgrds,
Aparna.

Hi,
i have faced same issue before.
 in receiver communication channel for IDoc you have to specify some important parametres port and sap release so on...
 while cretaing a port you have to give rfc destination in your port by using t-code IDX1.
go to rfc destination which was you given in port. check in your destination, tab MDMP & UNICODE.
Flag or disflag the option UNICODE/NO-UNICODE and test again.
once again check your message mapping.
regrds,
ganesh.
Edited by: ganesh.nijampudi on Nov 30, 2011 7:47 AM

Asset unplanned depreciation posted wrongly

Dear all,
For 100 assets unplanned depreciation posted wrongly. In AB08 reversed the documents but FI document is not generating for that. After this when I am doing repeat run in AFAB then normal depreciation is getting effected by this run. How to reverse the previous wrong run and post correct one Kindly suggest. Its very urgent.
Regards
Roomi

you can reverse posted depreciation by using OASV, but be VERY careful
that you reverse the FI and CO postings.
Thanks & Regards,
Suresh

Posting wrong after billing

hi experts,
here one issue which i am unable to understand and solve it
that " after billing ,i posted account , but the entries are posting wrong ,"
customer is not shown in entry and account is from both sides
JCLK 1 50 40010000 Sales-Dom-Base sale 10,000.00- INR
2 40 40010000 Sales-Dom-Base sale 10,000.00 INR
so where is my mistake and whats the solution i can get ?
thanx in advance
madhu

Hi,
You can check the Account analysis by goin to VF02 screen enter the invoice no. and on top Environment-A/c determination analysis- revenue accounts ..
Check the G/L accounts details and compare with the VKOA settings..it may give you some idea abt this issue..
Reg,
JJ

CC email Posting Wrong Time = "Forward 8 hours" in iphone in-box timeline

*CC email Posting Wrong Time = Forward 8 hours in the future in the iphone in-box timeline.*
All email sent from my iPhone CC to myself (back to my iPhone in-box posted in blue) is wrongly posted 8 hours in the future. If I open that email and check the time and date in the email... the send time and date are both correct... But, the email in the in-box list on the iphone continues to display the wrong time and date "in blue" 8 hours off.
(1) I tried all the tips mentioned i.e.,Rebooting and turning 3G & Auto on&off & Syncing to my Mac etc.= with no change at all.
(2) The same cc emails also sent to my MacBook Pro all are posted in the iMail in-box correctly with the normal time. The only problem is... on the iPhone in the in-box.
All the clocks and time displays on the iPhone seem to operate normally. Time zones are correct... The only problem is the in-Box email: post dating my email cc to myself = 8 hours in the future.
*The Negative Problems caused by this Issue:*
This problem causes any mail from other senders to follow the email I send 8 hour and of that all new email is lost in the middle of time line. Which is not good and, easy to lose new important email in the time-line.
*Start of the Problem:*
Seemed to start sometime after I updated my iPhone to the new iOS 4 software

Looks like it happening with incoming mail too. I have emails that are reporting 5 hours ahead. That would GMT for me in Eastern Time in the US.
The mail below came in at 09:06 -0500 and is reporting 14:06 GMT in the listing.
Here's the header from the email
X-Apparently-To: xxxxxxx via 98.136.164.163; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 06:06:32 -0800
Return-Path: <xxxxx@xxxx>
Received-SPF: none (mta1056.mail.ac4.yahoo.com: domain of xxxxxxxxx does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-YMailISG: 1PjiNX0cZAqCLQLNliMfNb9dB2OWwI.eU2239bCnrogOySot
rR3Ydo9QZmFymPPK4pFhoTrw1IqowFnzU4QFf6scJioC9AX1q58NaONBBK4u
4Kv3uxFt5b6ZVK5vinQN2bwNTq9TLwVJx3Z7zSxQbIxi46zwa526wkkqOgtg
wMCKSq99GazScsmxBgClCDTY5QZ1lP1cLQtXZIGfHAFsoVVBxCleMIElxh
JU.Dql7fu_mt99OzNRF4VVhB0SkUvqhamwEGlmGM8QtiZefJTE.eEniMIM85
jQ7hntFFxV95XHSqGsU._ynuHMzzC9whPYVB9b97.a1nnSZeCA5362veZYpY
SE9KBbkT2jiY9g0QSULKWpj24cxR5MU7..PiINLrcpzmiVwq5rZh6p4Q8DR1
hecJaIYhbqOOpZXu.tdtn0yWFX323ZiOsJemRto.Xn1F7safHhdq8Swk4xEg
.IHY8DdFHALVpzbwRhygVN0POEH.Gwc0Q01MRcd1QARw.uEy2K.BYudADvdG
y1RJCIDnbRZYjXPoa8Hn5qnbXGrQ2gLmpweekpo9cCZpXZ5P0JRlAUk5ZTwE
u3L.5asjUXgvTb8****91BNh6InUQre3Gk8CWkWaWIvv2Qzwz.2Ztp382beE
nZsKE283hmxhBskNYSZ9xrKMyNfWyY0nhzzEunBtuZ6qZPUHK7RyrYgRTnWg
qwiORZKE1R8q14xjYKXcPUbSeY377ZFgXw0EgH4rWE15F.2sfKhcy1U68G
jrz6dTBwK0EneceaJDX_kPRbCJ53e8ILeQXW.DtuTNO0FtJ7Ft6hfon0d8
Tm.0Z00AFCDLcs66oxK0GcLbzhA22t3huUDuB_JMWrnU0ab.8Vl8l0Ysk1Br
jxxjSzEps3TXDPL5pe7nUj5KX..VgGQOCmp8h1he0cDeA8u5IsUULwQ9Qwk0
6v2X_HAQE4kPnbh8YSroiZH8uZUKmV0Klpqnae6jfzReFjeCD.SX8Ng4yyyP
UI0AdRufNWCSHzf8qi53.POH7g63.Pq72ttdYXIEtChE7iFB5KT1
X-Originating-IP: [208.79.240.5]
Authentication-Results: mta1056.mail.ac4.yahoo.com from=shiksa.dyndns.org; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=shiksa.dyndns.org; dkim=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO smtpauth.rollernet.us) (208.79.240.5)
by mta1056.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 06:06:32 -0800
Received: from smtpauth.rollernet.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpauth.rollernet.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8080594010;
Sun, 30 Jan 2011 06:06:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shiksa.dyndns.org (c-66-56-51-47.hsd1.ga.comcast.net [66.56.51.47])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: nswint)
by smtpauth.rollernet.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;
Sun, 30 Jan 2011 06:06:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (shiksa.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1])
by shiksa.dyndns.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0UE6Lxo003350
for <xxxxxx>; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:06:22 -0500
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:06:22 -0500
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3
Subject: xxxxx by Noah Swint (0040) Sun, Jan 30 9:06 AM
To: xxxxxxx
From: xxxxxxx
X-Rollernet-Abuse: Processed by Roller Network Mail Services. Contact [email protected] to report violations. Abuse policy: http://rollernet.us/abuse.php
X-Rollernet-Submit: Submit ID 2c30.4d45705a.65e24.0
X-FetchYahoo: version 2.14.0 MsgId 152788AKOkiGIAAOhxTUVwaAwy2Se7FOE

Asset Posted Wrongly to Another Asset

Hi
My user have posted one Non-PO Asset posting into the SAP system, but realized that the Asset No. posted wrongly in last month (Nov 06) and depreciation had been done.
Please suggest whether I can reverse and repost to the correct Asset No. & what about the depreciation and any impact if I have done that.
Appreciated your inputs,
Rgds,
Vyas

Hi Vyas,
Execute transaction code AS92. Input the Asset Number, Sub-Asset Number and Company Code of the wrongly posted asset you want to correct. Then click on "Takeover Values". Delete the wrong figures for all depreciation areas for both the "***.acquis.val." and "Accm.ord.deprec" fields. Enter the correct Acquisition and Accummulated Depreciation values and Save your entries.
Next, you can now go ahead and recalculate depreciation using transaction code AFAR. This would adjust your books for you.
I hope the above helps.
Do not forget to award the points please.
Regards,
Jacob

Depreciation was posted wrong

depriciation was posted wrong,
this is posted entry
depriciation Dr 564
depriciation Dr 10000
To acc dep 564
To acc de[ 10000
actual entry is
dep DR 564
To acc dep 564
here we are maintaining in asset master 3 deprciation keys, one is 01 book dep, 20 IFRS, 90 asset revaluation.
here three dep keys are stright line method 33%, by mistake same dep key was assigned to all dep ares.
already dep was run. i want to assign 000 no dep to dep area 90,
five me any suggestion for this problem

Dear Bikkina,
I think old depreciation key is having the "Depreciation calculation to exact day" Check box Ticked in the Depreciation Key.
Hence the depreciation is calculated based on days. And the new Dep. Key is not enabled with the same, hence the error.
Read the following:- The "depreciation to the day" function becomes active for an asset as soon as the asset has a corresponding depreciation key and the asset is capitalized (posted to). Once this takes place, it is no longer possible to switch off this function for the asset, even if you change the depreciation key. On the other hand, it is not possible to activate this function for an asset after it has already been capitalized using a different depreciation key."
The possible solution is to Create another asset with new & correct depreciation key and transfer the values from old asset to new asset. This you can achieve by ABUMN T.code Asset Transfer within company code.
I hope this will help you out to solve your issue, if you have any doubts feel free to share - you are welcome !
Regards,
Pankaj A Bhalerao.

Posted Wrong question. Deleted it

Posted Wrong question. Deleted it

You're late to the game, my friend... The news was posted two weeks ago! If you're only going to update your OS every couple of weeks, maybe Arch isn't for you. Why would you want to use a bleeding edge distribution then? Bragging rights? Maybe you want something like Ubuntu or Debian Stable. Of course, you're gonna get older packages but hey, at least it's stable, right?
You must not have read the FAQ. Specifically:
"1.3 Q) Why would I not want to use Arch?"
"1.10 Q) Is Arch Linux a stable distribution? Will I get frequent breakage?"
If you think an OS should configure itself and run "out-of-the-box", then Arch isn't for you. Arch is a DYI distribution, where you can tailor it after your own heart.
$ find /lib -exec pacman -Qo -- {} +
^ This command should've told you which programs need removing or reinstalling, and which folders are left behind. If it's just "owned by glibc" or something like that (I don't even remember from two weeks ago), it means that you need to move (don't delete, that's just bad practice) the /lib/modules folder somewhere else and then run 'pacman -Su'.
# mv /lib/modules ~/lib.modules
# pacman -Su
Big deal. If you had bothered to search the forum you would've eventually got it.

VAT should post based on PO date or GR date not based on MIRO posting date

Hi,
Based on posting date in Invoice(MIRO) & condition record validity period, VAT is calculated & posting on invoice posting.
Condition record for VAT condition type with tax code(T9):
01.01.2011 to 31.01.2011-------> 4%
01.02.2011 to 28.02.2011------->12%
01.03.2011 to 31.03.2011------->14.5%
PO created and GR done on February & invoive done on March and syatem calculated VAT amount perfactly based on validity period maintained in condition recod and invoice posted.
But requirement is system should post invoice VAT amount as mentioned in the PO ( based on PO date) or GR date to post during Invoice posting in MIRO
Regards,
Biju K

Hi,
Any other input?
Regards,
Biju K

VAT calculation is wrong!!

Hi,
Its concerned to Indian Excise.
Scenario:
1)Tax code contains only 4% VAT & other excise duty is added manually in PO conditions.
2)In PO, VAT Calculation is correct
3)During invoice verifiavtion with ref to PO,Assessable values are flowing to MIRO for all line items of PO.
Error: when appropriate tax code is selected (Only 4% VAT) for each line item in MIRO,VAT value which is being calculated is not exactly equals to 4% instead its diiferent for each line items like 4.19%,4.74%,4.09% and 4.37%.
Can you pls advise,what is reason for this small difference in VAT calculation.
Regds

Hi,
I checked in detail,other things are correct.
But one more point is,infact there are 2 POs & 1 Invoice related to above issue.If I try to do MIRO for both POs together this Difference in VAT amount is reflecting as said before,If individual PO is considered for Invoice verification there is no such difference in VAT amount i can post the document.
Regds

VAT calculation going wrong in dealer invoice

Hi All,
I am doing a dealer purchase scenario where in am giving basic price inclusive of excise in the PO and then while capturing excise invoice am changing the base value and excise duties manually in MIGO by checking MRP indicator such that sum of excise base value and excise duty is equal to PO price and similarly am changing base while doing MIRO but am still not getting the VAT correct.
for example
PO price excluding VAT - 102,490.00
VAT - 4,099.60 + 1,024.90
Excise duties = 6,394.00 + 128.00 + 64.00
In MIGO i have changed base value as 95,904.00 and captured and posted the above excise duties. In MIRO i have changed base value as 95,904.00 and selected the tax code with excise 10.3 and VAT 4+1. Excise duties are coming as in excise invoice but VAT is being calculated based on PO price + (excise duty based on the base value in Excise Invoice i.e., )
Plz suggest
Edited by: SAp321436 on Jan 12, 2011 6:16 AM

hi
what are the exicse % you have maintained in TAX CODE
it should be zero
like excise =0
cess=0
secess=0
and vat =4
vat1 =1
ASSIGN ACCOUNTS for all conditions including excise
now check
regards
kunal
now use this code

Posted wrong group when talking about ITunes Store purchasing Album for me?

I just posted an error message and I postd the wrong group that I bought Red,Red Wine.UB40 was the "CORRECT NAME OF THE GROUP.Sorry about that,
I got confused.But did NOT purchase Ziggy Marley Album. Macine went crazy on your end.
Please refund me as soon as possible.
Myra Wade
myraow (at) earthlink (dot) net

Go here -> http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact.html?form=music&topic=Music%20Purcha ses&subtopic=Music%20Purchases

Need to know ,how SAP is Posting wrong Enrtry at the Table level for Same .

Hello SAP Experts ,
Good Morning Gems!!!
I have a Typical Issue here , SAP Is Posting In wrong tables
. Production is currently processed everything that it should process. This works as designed.
            PO = 7800507594 (From Plant 5400 to Plant 5409 - only NL, no intercompany)
            Dlvry = 81243277 (Has PGI but no Invoice, as it is the same company code!!!
The issue is that for some reason, SAP has put an entry into table VKDFS by mistake. This table is used by SAP to determine the list in VF04. This is why VF04 thinks it should create an invoice, but it should not. so we are getting error message that the Invoice cannot be created , which is valid, and a good thing.
Do we have OSS for 2 things:
            1) A note that mentions why it is determining the wrong CoCode or Sales Area which leads to the entry into this table
                        This is to stop it from adding entries incorrectly.
            2) A note that mentions how to fix the existing entries in this table that should not be there?
Awarded Full Points for the Correct answer
Thansk and Regards
Adarsh Srivastava
Supply Chain Consultant ,
CSC INDIA

Dear Friend,
I guess you item category in Delivery Document would be NLN.
Go to VOV7 & under Business Data there is a check box for Billing Relevance. This box should be blank. I mean if there is any entry in this box (either A or J) then remove it & make it blank.
Hope this helps...
Thanks,
Jignesh Metha

RTV(Mvmt-122) Posted wrongly in 2011 - How to correct

Hi All,
User has done some RTV(Return to vendor -122) wrongly in the year 2011. Some Delivery Order(Reference) is assigned wrongly. So,Reference(XBLNR) in PO History is not showing correctly.
Finance do not want to open 2011 period .so we can not reverse those wrong RTV documents .
is there any way , we can do the reversal in 2012 or is there any way to fix this issue.
I want the PO History to appear correctly with correct DO/Reference . Please advice,
Thanks
pabi

i believe delivery number was entered while posting 122 mvt type, once a document is posted you can not change anything on it
even if you cancel it system keeps history. check below documentation in help.sap.com
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/a5/63325643a211d189410000e829fbbd/content.htm
yogesh

Am I posting wrong? No replies on my post.

I just posted a topic I need some help with yesterday. It seems to be the only one that no one replied to. Did I do something wrong?

Thanks Colleen. No worries. Just new to the game. If you replied then I must have done it right. I guess my topic did not fly. I'm having glitches in my music when I import music from my cd collection. I've tried different software and different formats of importing--no luck. I'm wondering if there is an advanced cure-all out there that will import super clean music. The quality I get is good it's just these little scratches in the songs at random times that are real annoying.

Vat amoutn posted wrongly

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for