VAULT size is smaller than the LIBRARY

my vault size is smaller than the aperture library. is it saving everything? it seems like the two should be the same size or at least close to the same size. i regularly update my vault so that it is current with the library. VAULT = 168 GB | LIBRARY = 262 GB

what is the consequence if i totally turn previews off?
The major consequence is that you will not be able to share images from your library through the media browser. So if you want to email an image for example or add an image to a document you will need to export the image first rather then be able to get the preview from the library.
Also if you have referenced originals and the originals go off-line nothing will appear in the library. If you had previews for those images you would still see them and be able to do tasks like rate them.
Finally some operations might appear slower as you won;t see anything on the scree until the image you are looking at is rendered. With previews while Aperture is rendering the image in the background it will display the preview.
It is possible to selectively maintain previews for some projects and not for others. This might be a comprise position between having previews for al images and having no previews at all.

Similar Messages

ORA-13044: the specified tile size is smaller than the tolerance

Hi,
I get the oracle error ORA-13044: the specified tile size is smaller than the tolerance when I do the following point cloud clip:
8 sdo_geometry(2003,29903, null,
9 mdsys.sdo_elem_info_array(1,1003,3),
10 mdsys.sdo_ordinate_array(316504,316510,234084,234090)),
However the bounds of my point cloud are
316500 to 316511 and 234080 to 234092 and my tolerance during point cloud creation is set to 0.000015 (I have alterated this value before to make it smaller but nothing seems fit).
Where do I set the "tile size"?
The set consists of 100 points and blk_capacity is set to 50.
Any help is really greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
F.

Hi BKazar,
thanks for responding.
Yes, I tried out all sorts of things and swapped the numbers to see if that would fix the issue. It did not.
I have found out now though what the issue was. When I loaded the data file into Oracle, the guy who gave me the file said that the first column is the longitude, but it wasn't. After switching sdo_point.x and y the error disappeard.
I suppose the sdo_srid was expecting a different range and got confused because my long and lat were swapped.
Cheers,
F.

Backup vault always smaller than the library...?

My backup vault is alvays about 1 GB smaller than the original Aperture Library. How come? Is this right?

Thanks Now I can sleep well again.

Why is the Log Area size much smaller than the log volume

I have been following up on an Early Watch report that has been generated for our production SCM 5.0 system running liveCache 7.6.02 Build 14. The alert says "The LOG volumes size in your system is too small. Recommendation: Configure LOG Volumes to at least 2 GB". There are two interesting things about this.
1) I have spent the last couple of days reading all the OSS Notes, and MaxDB documentation I could find, and this does not seem to be documented as a recommendation anywhere. Does this seem like a realistic recommendation without taking into account the level of change actifity?
2) There is a single log volume allocated with size 2,097,160 KB. In production LC10 and DBMGUI report this to be correct size under volume details, but only list the total log area size as 1,706,328 (81% of the volume size). We have a non-production environment with exactly the same size log volume, but it reports that the log area size is 2,032,008 KB (97% of the volume). What leads to these different amounts of wasted space, and is there any way of getting the database to start using it?
Thanks,
Mark

Hi Natalia,
I did read 869267, several times. It does not answer my questions which is why I posted here.
DBMGUI version = 7.6.00.25
DBMCLI commands for PL1 (Production)
> xinstinfo PL1
IndepData           : /sapdb/data
IndepPrograms       : /sapdb/programs
InstallationPath    : /sapdb/PL1/db
Kernelversion       : KERNEL    7.6.02   BUILD 014-123-152-175
Rundirectory        : /sapdb/data/wrk/PL1
> dbmcli -d PL1 -u control,control
dbmcli on PL1>db_state
OK
State
ONLINE
dbmcli on PL1>info log
OK
END
Name                            | Value
Log Mirrored                    = NO
Log Writing                     = ON
Log Automatic Overwrite         = OFF
Max. Size (KB)                  = 1706328
Backup Segment Size (KB)        = 699048
Used Size (KB)                  = 104640
Used Size (%)                   = 6
Not Saved (KB)                  = 104640
Not Saved (%)                   = 6
Log Since Last Data Backup (KB) = 0
Savepoints                      = 5210
Checkpoints                     = 0
Physical Reads                  = 2469115
Physical Writes                 = 15655616
Queue Size (KB)                 = 48000
Queue Overflows                 = 646
Group Commits                   = 98205
Waits for Logwriter             = 10957511
Max. Waits                      = 10
Average Waits                   = 0
OMS Log Used Pages              = 0
OMS Min. Free Pages             = 0
dbmcli on PL1>param_getvolsall
OK
LOG_MIRRORED                     NO
MAXLOGVOLUMES                    2
MAXDATAVOLUMES                   14
LOG_VOLUME_NAME_001              262145     F /sapdb/PL1/saplog/DISKL001
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0001            524289     F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0001
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0002            524289     F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0002
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0003            524289     F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0003
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0004            524289     F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0004
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0005            524289     F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0005
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0006            524289     F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0006
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0007            524289     F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0007
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0008            524289     F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0008
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0009            1048577    F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0009
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0010            1048577    F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0010
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0011            1048577    F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0011
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0012            1048577    F /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0012
dbmcli on PL1>param_directget MAXCPU
OK
MAXCPU 12
dbmcli on PL1>param_directget MAX_LOG_QUEUE_COUNT
OK
MAX_LOG_QUEUE_COUNT     0
dbmcli on PL1>param_directget LOG_IO_QUEUE
OK
LOG_IO_QUEUE    6000
> xinstinfo SL1
IndepData           : /sapdb/data
IndepPrograms       : /sapdb/programs
InstallationPath    : /sapdb/SL1/db
Kernelversion       : KERNEL    7.6.02   BUILD 014-123-152-175
Rundirectory        : /sapdb/data/wrk/SL1
dbmcli on SL1>db_state
OK
State
ONLINE
dbmcli on SL1>info log
OK
END
Name                            | Value
Log Mirrored                    = NO
Log Writing                     = ON
Log Automatic Overwrite         = OFF
Max. Size (KB)                  = 2032008
Backup Segment Size (KB)        = 699048
Used Size (KB)                  = 3824
Used Size (%)                   = 0
Not Saved (KB)                  = 3824
Not Saved (%)                   = 0
Log Since Last Data Backup (KB) = 0
Savepoints                      = 1256
Checkpoints                     = 0
Physical Reads                  = 2178269
Physical Writes                 = 4969914
Queue Size (KB)                 = 16000
Queue Overflows                 = 21201
Group Commits                   = 643
Waits for Logwriter             = 751336
Max. Waits                      = 4
Average Waits                   = 0
OMS Log Used Pages              = 0
OMS Min. Free Pages             = 0
dbmcli on SL1>param_getvolsall
OK
LOG_MIRRORED                     NO
MAXLOGVOLUMES                    2
MAXDATAVOLUMES                   10
LOG_VOLUME_NAME_001              262145     F /sapdb/SL1/saplog/DISKL001
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0001            262145     F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata1/DISKD0001
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0002            262145     F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata2/DISKD0002
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0003            1048577    F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata3/DISKD0003
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0004            1048577    F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata4/DISKD0004
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0005            783501     F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata1/DISKD0005
DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0006            783501     F /sapdb/SL1/sapdata2/DISKD0006
dbmcli on SL1>param_directget MAXCPU
OK
MAXCPU 4
dbmcli on SL1>param_directget MAX_LOG_QUEUE_COUNT
OK
MAX_LOG_QUEUE_COUNT     0
dbmcli on SL1>param_directget LOG_IO_QUEUE
OK
LOG_IO_QUEUE    2000
Thanks for the explaination of the reserved space for the Log Queue pages. This does explain why there is the difference between the two. I think we probably have our log segment size too large. As you can see we do get occasional log queue overflows. Do you suggest we increase the size of our log IO queue higher, and allocate more log volume space to compensate?
select * from SYSINFO.LOGSTATISTICS (on PL1)
1706328;334176;19;334176;19;1879;20305192;64109066;7806480;182151514;12;48000
DBMGUI Log Area Usage
Total Size: 2048.01 MB
Free Log Area: 1330.38 MB
Used Log Area: 335.96 MB
Unsaved Log Area: 335.96
Log since Last Data Backup: 0.00 MB
Thanks,
Mark

Why the flashback log'size smaller than the archived log ?

hi, all . why the flashback log'size smaller than the archived log ?

Lonion wrote:
hi, all . why the flashback log'size smaller than the archived log ?Both are different.
Flash logs size depends on parameter DB_FLASHBACK_RETENTION_TARGET , how much you want to keep.
Archive log files is dumped file of Online redo log files, It can be either size of Online redo log file size or less depending on online redo size when switch occurred.
Some more information:-
Flashback log files can be created only under the Flash Recovery Area (that must be configured before enabling the Flashback Database functionality). RVWR creates flashback log files into a directory named “FLASHBACK” under FRA. The size of every generated flashback log file is again under Oracle’s control. According to current Oracle environment – during normal database activity flashback log files have size of 8200192 bytes. It is very close value to the current redo log buffer size. The size of a generated flashback log file can differs during shutdown and startup database activities. Flashback log file sizes can differ during high intensive write activity as well.
Source:- http://dba-blog.blogspot.in/2006/05/flashback-database-feature.html
Edited by: CKPT on Jun 14, 2012 7:34 PM

Error Code - client cache is smaller than the size of the requested content

Even though we have increased the size of the ccmcache via Control Panel > Configuration Manager, we still get the Error Code 0x87D01202 (-2016407038) "the content
download cannot be performed because the total size of the client cache is smaller than the size of the requested content" The CCMEXEC Service and computer have both been restarted, after increasing the ccmcache size. Which local log
file under C:\Windows\CCM\Logs should we check for more information ?
Thanks

so when you re deploying the client go into your settings and set the variable below:
smscachesize=10240
note:
SMSCACHESIZE
Specifies the size of the client cache folder in megabyte (MB) or as a percentage when used with the PERCENTDISKSPACE or PERCENTFREEDISKSPACE property. If this property is not set, the folder defaults to a maximum size of 5120 MB. The lowest value that you
can specify is 1 MB.
Note
If a new package that must be downloaded would cause the folder to exceed the maximum size, and if the folder cannot be purged to make sufficient space available, the package download fails, and the program or application will not run.
This setting is ignored when you upgrade an existing client and when the client downloads software updates.
Example: CCMSetup.exe SMSCACHESIZE=100
Note
If you reinstall a client, you cannot use the SMSCACHESIZE or SMSCACHEFLAGS installation properties to set the cache size to be smaller than it was previously. If you try to do this, your value is ignored and the cache size is automatically set to the last
size it was previously.
For example, if you install the client with the default cache size of 5120 MB, and then reinstall the client with a cache size of 100 MB, the cache folder size on the reinstalled client is set to 5120 MB.
Twitter: @dguilloryjr LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/dannyjr Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/#!/dguilloryjr

Why is my "Combined PDF" file size smaller than the original files?

Hello!
I am trying to combine two individual PDF files into a single PDF. Each file is 32mb, however when I use acrobat to combine them, the newly created "combined" file is only 19mb. I believe I've taken the necessary steps to ensure no degradation is happening (i.e. selecting Large File Size in the options panel), but I am still puzzled as to how two files can be put together as one and be smaller than the two separate files with out any compression. What am I missing?
Thanks in advance!

When you combine a file it does a "Save As" operation. This re-writes all of the PDF object in the single file and is supposed to clean up the file, whereas the single files may have had multiple saves which when you look at the internals of the PDF file simply add on to the end of the file. In other words you get a more cleanly written and optimized file that is also saved for Fast Web View.

Why is the version file smaller than the original file, although I didn't make changes in the file? And why is the keywords don't exporting with original files?

Hi! Why is the version file smaller than the original file, although I didn't make changes in the file? And why is the keywords don't exporting with original files?

Wild guess: you're using the the wrong export settings. You'll need to tell us more before we can help you - like the export settings you're usng, the size and format of the originals etc.

Thumbnails in the browser 3.3 is smaller than the previous version

thumbnails in the browser 3.3 is smaller than the previous version.

I did this, the difference is very small. for some reason the size of thumbnails was limited in the browser. in split view window if you increase the thumbs are larger. I'll try to photograph the screen to show the difference. excuse my google translator

Why Is My Snapshot Smaller Than The Webcam?

I am trying to make a snapshot of the users webcam, but the snapshot is 1/4 the size of the running webcam and doesn't fill the bitmap data section. Also is there a better way I can Add and position the snapshot.?
import flash.display.BitmapData;
import flash.display.DisplayObject;
var bandwidth:int = 0; // Specifies the maximum amount of bandwidth that the current outgoing video feed can use, in bytes per second. To specify that Flash Player video can use as much bandwidth as needed to maintain the value of quality , pass 0 for bandwidth . The default value is 16384.
var quality:int = 100; // this value is 0-100 with 1 being the lowest quality. Pass 0 if you want the quality to vary to keep better framerates
var cam:Camera = Camera.getCamera();
cam.setQuality(bandwidth, quality);
cam.setMode(320,240,30,false); // setMode(videoWidth, videoHeight, video fps, favor area)
video_vobj.attachCamera(cam);
stage.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, takephoto);
var screenS:BitmapData = new BitmapData(320, 240, true, 0xCCCCCCCC);
var screenS_image:Bitmap=new Bitmap(screenS);
function takephoto(e:MouseEvent):void
screenS.draw(video_vobj) ;
addChild(screenS_image) ;
screenS_image.x = 360;
screenS_image.y = 20;

OK…I purchased and downloaded Elements 9.0 for my MACs ( I have two in two different locations). I installed on both and the brushes work as expected on one of them but not the other. Guess that is why I asked about a reinstall….possibly something went wrong on this computer when installed.
I am just trying to create an image for a background paper and have selected a brush. I resize it with the bracket key (and have also tried resizing with the slider on the menu up top). I hover the brush over the area I want to place it and then click. The brush is smaller than the hover image every time. Makes it hard to know where to lace my brush for proper placement. As far as the percentage…..that actually is a guesstimate, but it isn't 50% smaller that's for sure.
Eileen

Can Adobe Collage be used for images smaller than the standard 1200 by 789?

Can Adobe Collage be used for images smaller than the standard 1200 by 789?

Hi,
* Photoshop Touch does have very good text capabilites.
* For opening the Collage as an Artwork (Merged layer) in Photoshop Touch, you just need to upload the Collage file to Creative cloud and import it directly into Photoshop Touch.
But if you are looking to preserve all the layers of the Collage file, you should download the Collage file as PSD from Creative Clould and import it in Photoshop Touch as layers.
* Collage does have canvas scalability, you can extend up the canvas on all the four directions. But i think in you case you are looking for having specific custom sizes of the canvas, which is not currently available in Collage. Currently you cannot shrink the canvas below the default canvas size.
Hope this is helpful. Please do revert back if you have more queries.
-Subbi

How can I Copy/backup photos in iphoto to external drives smaller than iPhoto library

How can I Copy/backup photos in iphoto to external drives smaller than iPhoto library? I have several 128 GB SSD's that I want to use to copy/backup all my iPhoto photographs for a permanent archive due to stability...but my iPhoto library is larger than the drives (about 234 GB) so it would require two of the SSD's...how best to get the original photos onto the SSD's? I'm running Yosemite and iPhoto 9.6...thx.

Terrence - Can you explain what you mean by data loss? In the iPhoto Library? Or on the copy?
Larry - In what way is each photo "degraded"? Quality? Isn't it simply making an an exact copy, in this case a jpeg, as would happen if I dragged and dropped a different file type? Is there another type of degradation?
I am working on trying to create a correct backup as well (per your instructions) but I wanted to use this as a "put in a fireproof safe" archive on very small SSD's that would never have a mechanical hard drive problem (we've lost a couple over time so aren't real confident in their staying power)...I also recognize that I I won't have newer photos in this archive group but at least it would have 98% of our photos in another off-site location...at least that's the thought...
Thx for your input and look forward to more in your reply...

Copied folder smaller than the original one

Hi, when I copy my folder of Logic song material (size approx. 4,55 GB, located on the desk) to an external Harddisk (WD ´my book´, I guess Fat32, brandnew and not formatted under OS X) or via my inhouse network (on a windows PC with NTFS), the copied folder is smaller than the original one - approx. 4,2 or 4,3 GB then.
Is that normal or are files lost during the copying? I need help with this urgently, because I have to do the backup.
My system: PowerMac G5 Dual, 2,5 GHz, 3 GB RAM, Tiger (newest version), nothing special.
Thank you für your help,
PE

Philip
Is that normal or are files lost during the copying? I need help with this urgently, because I have to do the backup.Copying can certainly reduce the space taken, because fragmentation is reduced.
If you want a one off count of your folder, you can do this:
Open the Terminal (from /Applications/Utilities) and type
cdNow type a space, and then drag the folder you are interested in to the Terminal window. It will fill in the path automatically, so you will see something like
cd /Users/jdoe/Documentsfor example. Now type a return, and then copy and paste the following, as one line, into the Terminal window:
<pre>echo "`find . -type f \! -name ".*" | wc -l` files and `find . -type d | wc -l` folders"</pre>Now press return, and wait!
As an indication, for my Home folder it takes about 35 seconds on a 600MHz iBook (slow drives in these laptops) to tell me I have 16631 files and 3920 folders. The command does not count dotfiles, such as ".DS_Store", deliberately, so there may be small discrepancies.

All my brushes are about 20% smaller than the diameter of the circle. What's happened?

All my brushes are about 20% smaller than the diameter of the circle. What's happened?

Visited Genius Bar. Solution was System Preferences/Accessibility/Display and move cursor size to Normal. A couple months back I evidently saw the option of making the arrow larger and did so and did not discover the problem in Elements until later. Before I visited Genius Bar I discovered same problem with Photoshop CS6 and Pixelmator. I had also uninstalled then reinstalled Elements and knew it wasn't a bug in the software.

Is the website always smaller than the screen?

New to Mac...very frustrating to learn about it without help. Lots of things bug me...first being...why are the websites (window) smaller than the whole screen? Can this be changed?

The green button in the "traffic lights" (top left corner of window) will toggle between max size and whatever size you have set it to by dragging the bottom right corner.
Mac 101 is a good place for a beginner - and of course you will get great support in these forums.

VAULT size is smaller than the LIBRARY

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for