Vector shapes printed jagged - or is it me?

http://prosol1.com/mw_images/pen_tool_lines.pdf
i created the above in ill CS4 [i created the above PDF for you to see].  i printed it direct from the ill file and the curves are not what i thought they would be.  but then again, maybe it's because of the printer we use?
we use an HP 2550 color laser printer.  maybe this printer can't handle the pen tool vector shapes?  am i not making the shapes the proper way to insure they are smooth when printed?  or is it the printer?
thanks - mike
is there

Is your printer a postscript printer? What resolutions does it support? What is its max resolution?
If it is a Postscript printer check the settings in Advanced of the print dialog.

Similar Messages

  • Illustrator vector shapes become jagged in flash

    does anyone know why when importing vector shapes from
    illustrator into flash the shapes become very jagged when the swf
    file is published?
    thanks

    Hi R-Designer,
    The jagged edges are caused by the import process in Flash.
    When it
    encounters complex fills or lines it can't directly handle,
    it converts them
    to bitmaps. Illustrator will also sometimes do this when
    exporting for
    Flash. Unfortunately, the only way to deal with this is to
    reduce the
    complexity of your image (especially fills or fancy lines) or
    exporting the
    whole thing as a high-res bitmap.
    Regards,
    Patrick Bay
    BAY NEW MEDIA
    "R-Designer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:foacbt$4fg$[email protected]..
    > I'm having the same problem. I've taken an AI and tried
    to import as an
    > AI, PDF
    > and 'save for web' gif and the outer curve is jagged.
    The inner curves
    > look
    > great. I've noticed none of the questions regarding this
    type of problem
    > have
    > been answered... Any ideas?
    >

  • Vector shapes suddenly looks jagged when exported from InDesign to pdf

    I've read several discussions on pdf export topics but none of them seem to solve this issue. I have an indesign document with multiple pages, its both vector shapes, text and pixel graphics. I worked on this for weeks and I exported this document to pdf numerous times and it all looked good every time I did it. All of a sudden I started to get a very bad looking export, just out of the blue the shapes, logos etc got this jagged look and it looks aweful - see my enclosed examples.
    I have done nothing to my pdf export setup, InDesign setup or any screen preferances. It's just a mystery to me. It seems to be hurting all my sirculare shapes and not my text in general! Every pixel image / photography exports perfect to pdf. My page display is set to smooth text rendering in my pdf preferences. What's up? What puzzles me is this happened so sudden after numerous fine exports.  I'm using InDesign CS6.
    This is the O in a logo that's been placed on a page. The right one is what I get when I export to pdf now, the left one is what I used to get

    John, your are very wrong about post #2. I personally had a rendering problem that was all solved by setting the opacity to 99.9% - it was exported horribly but fixed by this operation. You can read other user stories that confirms this too. But this is not the same issue so let's leave it at that. I just wanted to mention it in terms of having jagged exports.
    There's been no updates thats been changing the Acrobat settings. Acrobat has a default setting in terms of page display that I haven't changed ever as a matter of fact. I shared that info in case someone asked. I'm not connected to any printer, the file is for screen view and third partie receivers can print if they need to (I'm not connected to any printer at work, there's a no print policy). Watching the corporate identity material look terrible on the screen is hardly something a marketing manager likes to do and I don't wanna be the designer responsible for that. So all I want is to solve this mystery and get things back to how it was just two days ago. As described nothing is changed in terms of technical things AND the same terrible results occur when opening a new indd file with a new vector file and exporting that. So the error is not connected to a spesific document or file.
    I remember having export rendering problems of all kinds in CS3, CS4 and CS5, it was all sort of quirky operations I had to do to solve them. Once I actually sat on the phone talking to a technical advisor at Adobe in Ireland while he was trying to explain that this was one of those weak spots of InDesign vs Acrobat. I was emailed a script, if that's not a bugfix I don't know what is. He tried to explain how to embedd the file into the installation setup but the end of the story was a full CS4 MA Collection refund. I'm trying to avoid placing foreign calls this time around and nothing has helped so far. I've been reading endless forum threads different places that describes the problem I have but they never end up with a solution for InDesign CS6 and export routines. It's just a series of errors and questions. I've turned the stone a million times, but all I see is...stone

  • Vector Circle Has Jagged Edges - Why?

    I'm creating a button logo in Fireworks for print use and
    wanted to use Vector shapes as I thought they didn't distort.
    I'm working in CMYK at 300DPI.
    So I start out with a white vector circle for the outer-ring
    to the button using an Anti-Alias edge:
    White
    Button
    Then I add the inner vector cirle, same deal as before:
    Blue inner
    circle
    So far so good.
    Now I add an outer bevel effect to the blue circle to give
    the button effect and....
    WOOOOOAAAAHHH!!!!
    The blue circle's edges have gone jagged! What happened
    there? I thought that Vector shapes retained their edges because
    they weren't confined to tiny pixels. What's going on, why aren't
    the edges retaining their smoothness once I've applied an effect to
    the shape?

    For now, if you recreate the effect with an inner bevel
    instead you will
    get rid of the jaggies. (softness = 7)
    alex
    thedrumdoctor wrote:
    >
    quote:
    Originally posted by:
    Newsgroup User
    > thedrumdoctor wrote:
    > > I tried the an export as a 24 Bit PNG and the edges
    remaind jagged.
    > >
    > > I tried the same experiment in Photoshop with the
    Vectors shapes there and
    > the edges were perfect. Looks like Photoshop wins!
    >
    > Not sure what I am doing differently. I created a 300
    dpi image in FW,
    > drew the circle, filled it with blue and added a soft
    bevel. No jagged
    > edges. At 100% magnification things look fine on screen.
    >
    > Did similar in PS and got a very similar result,
    although the bevel is a
    > bit smoother.
    >
    > Are you referring to printed work, or screen work?
    >
    > Would really appreciate seeing the original png and
    samples of the
    > Photoshop vs Fireworks end results. If it's a
    reproducible issue, it
    > should be reported as a bug for future releases.
    >
    > --
    > Jim Babbage - .:Community MX:. & .:Adobe Community
    Expert:.
    >
    http://www.communityMX.com/
    > CommunityMX - Free Resources:
    >
    http://www.communitymx.com/free.cfm
    > ---
    > .:Adobe Community Expert for Fireworks:.
    > Adobe Community Expert
    >
    http://tinyurl.com/2a7dyp
    > ---
    > See my work on Flickr
    >
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim_babbage/
    >
    >
    >
    > Well, I've repeated the exercise with a new png file and
    uploaded it here
    >
    http://www.nlauro.f9.co.uk/images/test.vector.circles.png
    >
    > As you can see, the edges are still jagged on the blue
    circle. You can
    > download this and see for yourself anyway.
    >
    > This was done in Fireworks MX so I'm not using the
    latest release of Fireworks.
    >
    > The shape was eventually destined for print work by the
    way. As much as I
    > don't like the clumsy way PS forces you to create vector
    shapes, it produced a
    > near perfect smooth edge on the same experiment.
    >

  • Can you blur vector shapes in Photoshop without rasterizing?

    Is there a way to blur vector shapes in Photoshop, similar to the way Illustrator does, without having to rasterizing the layer? I am working with a very large file that has been scaled from 300dpi to 50 in order to manage it while working. I will sclae back to 300 dpi before sending to printer. Rasterized images will soften as you know which i guess is ok when it comes to a blurred shape, now that i think about it. But for future reference?
    Thanks,
    DM

    In the layer of interest make sure the vector mask is selected. Then in the Masks panel adjust the feather slider to an amount that looks right.
    Paulo

  • Exporting Vector shapes to Illustrator?

    I know I can get illustrator vector shapes into motion, but what about getting them out?
    I've some nice shapes created I want to get out for print piece and I don't want to have to recreate them.

    As far as I can tell, it can't be done. Perhaps you can export a still with Alpha, high resolution into Photoshop and then convert the selection to a path... It probably won't be quite as smooth or crisp, but If you can get it enough high res then it would probably work.
    Out of curiosity, I attempted to print the Motion file (after creating a vector shape)... but instead of printing, I hit save as PDF (to see if it would transfer the vector data)...
    But it didn't work. I tried opening in Illustrator and just got an empty box.

  • Created a CYMK vector shape logo in photoshop, now need to change to spot colors HELP!?

    I have created a 3 color logo with vector shapes in photoshop CS6.  The problem is the client wants it to be 3 spot colors rather than CYMK.  Does anyone have a quick and easy way for me to change the individual vector shape layers into various spot colors instead that maintains the vector quality?  I don't want to have to redraw all these shapes.  Help would be VERY appreciated with this.

    Your client is speaking in the language of Illustrator, in which spot colors represent specific, sometimes specialist colours.  I can think of no reason why you can't use Photoshop, but ask the client if they want to provide you with values for the spot colours?   If I understand it correctly, the printer will interpret each of the three spot colours you use, to represent the specific inks/colours the client needs.
    Use spot colors | Adobe Illustrator CC tutorials
    You encounter it sometimes when printing catalogs which contain sponsor logos.  I can remember once getting an incredibly detailed PDF from Canon on how we could use their logo, with warnings of dire consequences if we got it wrong.

  • Where to locate Text Scrambler & Vector Shape Generator in Boris ?

    My FCE4 installation disc comes with Boris Calligraphy User Guide Version 2.0.
    I printed out the pdf file of Boris Calligraphy User Guide Version 2.0.
    In it, there are chapters on Text Scrambler & Vector Shape Generator but how do I access this Generator in FCE4 ? I can only see Title3D Generator and Title Crawl Generator.
    Thanks

    I don't know of any such generators that come with FCE. Perhaps Boris included the documentation so if you like Title3D and Title Crawl then you will purchase the newer generators. I am pretty sure that the others you mention aren't included with FCE4.

  • How do I automate global vector shape, mask & path transfers to Illustrator?

    Using: WIN7, Adobe CS5, PS, AI (but others may appreciate answers for CS6, etc.)
    When I need to move a project from  Photoshop to Illustrator, I need an automated way to prep shape and vector mask items for export--preferably preserving the structure and layout that already exists as layer names and order, character and paragraph settings, and of course global registration. My scripting is limited to recording actions, so I need to find an existing script or get coached on this. Any recommendations?
    I have googled and waded through numerous forum posts trying to research this on my own, so I know about the ability to export my path collection, but that's usually inapplicable in reality. It only deals with vectors from the Paths pallette. In Photoshop, I use the Paths pallet to store master and WIP paths, but all the working paths are either shapes or vector masks--or active type layers. Often enough that it's become an issue, I'll need to move the whole project to Illustrator. Obviously, the process has issues; I'm not expecting the rastor layers or Photoshop styles to carry over, but I see no reason why I can't capture text, shape and vector mask elements.
    They all have a vector component, but simply opening a PSD in Illustrator flattens (badly) the layers. I select the "Convert Layers as Objects" but have yet to see it extract editable text. I'm not sure if it even attempts to do anything with vector shapes or masks. I've got a process for moving a project one element at a time, using registration marks--but this requires turning text into shapes most of the time, especially if I am trying to preserve kerning and leading crucial to the layout. Maybe I just have not found the right info, and there is a way to transfer editable text without losing character and paragraph settings. I'd love to hear about it.
    For now, I'd be happy to stop wasting time doing a ton of conversions and renaming by hand, just so I can preserve the work I've already invested.
    One suggestion, posted under a multiple path export question, was to use scripting... but no one explored or explained how to go about it. I'm not asking for the impossible, however. I simply need help working out my own solution: if there is no application method for transferring the elements, try to script a method to prep those elements for export. Before I even attempt to reinvent someone's wheel, I am putting the question out there:
    Does anyone know of a solution that already exists?
    I appreciate hearing your advice and thank you for giving this some attention!
    edit:  I kept at it and managed to open my current project PSD in AI with text and shape/mask vectors successfully--not as cleanly as I'd hoped but the relative positioning of things was acceptable. I am still interested in hearing people's suggestions on better ways to transfer work from one tool to the other, though. I know this is going to come up for me again and again...
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    It sounds like you have gotten this working for your project, but you might look at this thread for a few different solutions.  http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1045757

  • How do I change the units for the vector shape stroke in the option bar?

    I work with vector shapes very often in Photoshop. In CS6, they have added the stroke and fill tools in the option bar.
    If I open a file with vector shapes that was created in CS5, the stroke defaults to 3pt. I would prefer it to default to pixels instead of points. I have found that if I change the settings prior to creating a new shape, it retains those attributes for all future shapes. However, if I am working on an older file, and would like to use this tool, it is frustrating to have to change this unit every time.
    Any assistance would be helpful. Thanks!

    Every time I move the volume, it moves back!
    Check, if you have a volume automation set on the software instrument track.
    If the track volume automation curve is enabled, the volume slider for the track will move with the automation curve.
    Click the automation curves disclosure triangle in the track header and disable the volume automation.

  • MouseClick trough a vector shape not working when there is a bitmap below it?

    Hello, I got something strange going on.
    I have one class called Person that extends a Sprite.
    First i have a bitmap that i add to the sprite class:
    This bitmap is a transparent PNG.
    addChild(_imageBitmap);
    then i did some drawing in Flash that has the shape of this person and extended this to
    the SimpleButton. This way, only the edge or the inner shape is clickable.
    then i add this shape to this Person class too.
    addChild(_personShape);
    This way, the shape is on top of the bitmap.
    Now i have an clickable item behind this person. This item is visible because it  is in the
    transparent area of the bitmap and shape.
    This clickable item does not respond on the mouse click! Only when i disabel the imageBitmap
    (I tried uncomment the line addChild(_imageBitmap) and then it works just fine!
    This means that the bitmap is causing the problem to get a click trough.
    Is there a propertie for a bitmap like MouseChildren = false? or something else to make use
    of a click trough within a shape?
    Regards,
    Chris.

    Hello Ned,
    Thanks for the advise, but i already tried the mouseChildren properties.
    The bitmap has no property mouseChildren, so i created a new Container (sprite) and added
    this bitmap to it and set the mouseChildren property to it. and the MouseEnabled too, but nothing happend differently.
    The strange thing of this, is the fact that the rollOver and the RollOut item behind the bitmap image works just fine.
    It has probably something to do with the fact that the clickable item is an displayObject3D (Papervision)
    But what i also don't understand is when i don't use this bitmap, and only the vector shape it works just fine.
    So i did a little trick, i did a break apart from he image and cut out the shape of the person with the lasso tool.
    And i replaced this with the image shape and now it works.
    Regards,
    Chris.

  • Ps CS5 vector shape redraw problem

    So I use vector shape layers a lot where I feather the edges to make shadows and what not; I also place layer masks on them.
    The problem I'm having is that when I move the shape around in the document, most of the time the image stays where it was originally and doesn't update to the new location.  That is unless I click on the vector mask, move it back and forth, and turn the layer mask on and off – only then does it update to the new location.
    I hope this makes sense, but if not ask away.  I didn't see any other threads regarding this issue, but if I missed it please redirect me.
    Thanks!
    I'm running Ps 12.0.4x64 on a MacBook Pro – OSX 10.7.2 – 2.3GHz Core i7 with 8GB RAM.  I've had this problem on two other Macs as well.

    Boilerplate-text:
    As with all unexplainable Photoshop-problems you might try trashing the prefs (after making sure all customized presets like Actions, Patterns, Brushes etc. have been saved and making a note of the Preferences you’ve changed) by pressing command-alt-shift on starting the program or starting from a new user-account.
    System Maintenance (repairing permissions, purging PRAM, running cron-scripts, cleaning caches, etc.) might also be beneficial, Onyx has been recommended for such tasks.
    http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/system_disk_utilities/onyx.html
    Weeding out bad fonts never seems to be a bad idea, either. (Validate your fonts in Font Book and remove the bad ones.)
    If 3rd party plug-ins are installed try disabling them to verify if one of those may be responsible for the problem.
    Does turning off OpenGL in the Performance Preferences and restarting Photoshop have any bearing on the issue?

  • Can i edit a vector shape after it's been deselected?

    can i edit a vector shape after it's been deselected?
    the properties palette seems to loose it's values apart from density and feather. Can I not return to a shape to add rounded corners etc?

    That's because you're on the mask pane instead of the object properties pane in the properties panel.
    Look at the icons at the top of the panel that show different panes.

  • Bitmaps vs. Vector Shapes

    So I'm making a site(duh). And I have read multiple times
    that a vector shape has all the advantages. Their sizeable, and
    faster loading and just gerenerally better for web design. I have
    read that alot. Did I really read that? Are Vector Shapes really
    better than bitmaps coming from PS? Why then did I trace all my
    imported bitmap images and my site can barely run? The tortis would
    surely win in this race. This makes no sence to me. Thanks for your
    time and consideration.
    Peace and Love,
    Mike.

    Shapes created in CS6 with a fill should work in CS5.
    But there is no way to make them 100% compatible because CS6 has features that CS5 did not.
    And CS5 will not be able to show the strokes on shapes.
    The message in CS5 is because the file contains data that CS5 can't understand -- no, there is no way to avoid that, because it's telling you something important.

  • Saving PDF from AI causes TIF images to be 'intersected' by vector shape behind it

    Hi,
    I am encountering this issue frequently and would appreciate any insight...
    When I have a design made up of both embedded TIF Images and vector shapes which overlap, the shape of the vector beneath 'cuts' or intersects the image laid on top and produces a white area there.
    It is seen in the full color PDF's I send to the printers at the local newspaper. The PDF is saved at 180dpi. The 'save illustrator editing capabilities' makes no difference whether it's checked on or not. It does not occur in 300 dpi PDF's Saved from AI.
    The problem is the printers save all artwork to 180dpi PDF's no matter what format I send.
    Can this be avoided by doing something on my side? or has anyone else had this before?
    Thanks,
    TJ

    andrejfavia2 wrote:
    And since no one has replied back to me, I'm guessing that the average user doesn't even know how to do something basic like export a vector PDF from graphics with text,
    it seems so.. as you don´t know how to do it. 
    sorry i can´t help im a photo guy and i think i have never touched PDF in photoshop.
    andrejfavia2 wrote:
    What are you people doing?? This is such a tortorous user interface!!
    yep especially that copy and paste is not working via mouse annoys me. i only get the "insert, image link" stuff on my right mouse button.... and i don´t need that as often as copy & paste.
    the quote function is not very good either, compared with other forum software.

Maybe you are looking for