Vendor Account not getting automatically cleared using F.13 (OB74)

Dear Sir / Mam,
I want to clear vendor account open item based on assignment field.
for this
1. I configured OB74 as below
YAIN     K     0     9999999999     ZUONR (where YAIN = COA)
2. One of my vendor account # 300031 is appearing as below
Assignment              DocumentNo      Type          Doc. Date          Amount in local cur.
TestF.13                100000034            SA           17.02.2012                   275.00
TestF.13                5100000266          RE            20.05.2010                   275.00-
3. I executed T-Code F.13 and I selected CoCode, FY, Flagged Select Vendor Option & selected Vendor Account Number and executed in Production Run where in I am getting the following message.
I  Program started by:           " CSPL
I  Start date     " 17.02.2012  Start time     " 23:44:04
S  No customer documents selected
S  No G/L account documents selected
I  Only accounts with debit and credit postings are included
I  Stop date      " 17.02.2012  Stop time      " 23:44:05
There after If i go and check the vendor account the open item are still open!
I want to clear it through T-Code F.13 as I have mass documents be cleared like this.
(Therefore I am not clearing it through F-44)
Please guide me as where am I going wrong.
Thanks In Anticipation
Regards
Chirag Shah

Dear Jessica,
In OB74,
I have Put my chart of accounts - YAIN,
Account type K,
From / To accounts  as 0 to 99999999 (as they are numbered/charactered in the master record),
criteria 1 is ZUONR.
Account doesn't have Zero Balance but there are few line items with comman assignment text total of which is ZERO in Doc Currency (As I have shown in query)
in F.13
Clearing date is tried as 17-02-2012 as well as 18-02.2012
Unticked Test run (= Production RUN)
and executed.
But still it shows the given below details, gives the same message and not clearing the line items.
    CoCd AccTy Account number   G/L           Open Items    Clrd Items
    1000 K     0000300031       0030021002            9             0       
Thanks & Regards
Chirag Shah

Similar Messages

  • Billing document cancellation (VF11) the cancelled doc. is not getting automatically cleared against the actual billing doc.

    Hi All,
    In case of billing document cancellation (VF11) the cancelled doc. is not getting automatically cleared against the actual billing doc. no. Each time user has to clear the doc. manually. We have observed this issue after recent patch updation dated 22nd Feb’2014. Till 21st Feb’2014 the cancelled doc. has been cleared automatically against their respective billing documents.
    Please guide.
    Thank you.

    Hi Gopi,
    Please chheck SAP Note No. 1259505. It explains two ways in which SAP releases cancellation documents to FI.
    OSS NOte 1259505 lists the possible causes from SD side &
    OSS Note 309208 lists the possible causes from FI side.
    Regards,
    Kavita

  • Vendor Account not getting credited

    Dear Gurus,
    After doing MIRO, my GR/IR clearing account is getting debited, but my vendor account is not. Instead the account Gain-IR small diffs is getting credited. Where is the setting to change this, so that my vendor account gets credited.
    Regards
    Prashant

    HI
    Inorder to check whether your vendor account is getting credited or not go to Transaction OBYC
    and check the debit transaction KBS ,
    and then check the posting key 81 for debit and 91 for credit is maiintained or not .
    this will give the GL account that is being credited to go to transaction FD10 to checj the vendor balance.
    hope this hellps.
    regards
    Vignesh

  • Vendor Account not getting Cleared.

    Dear All,
    First of all thanks everyone for your support till date.
    I have an issue. When I am trying to clear a vendor account from F-44 its not getting cleared. Its showing a negative balance of Cash discount and is not getting adjusted with any account.
    However when I am processing the open item for the same vendor in FBL1N. The total is 0.
    Can any one suggest how to go ahead and clear this account.
    Thanks & regards
    Om Prakash gupta

    Dear All,
    Any updates on this issue as it has become a serious problem here. There ia an objection from Auditor.
    Kindly Suggest.
    Regards
    OM

  • Accounting documents not getting automatically cleared.

    Dear Experts,
    User posted the sales Billing invoice and delivered the order...later on he cancelled the Billing invoice in VF11 then it generated reversed billing document and accounting entry.
    But the system still shows billing entry and reverse entry as open items in Accounting.
    Please provide the solution to get cleared automatically.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hello
    Please take a look at OSS Note 1363713.
    The reason that you cannot have auto clearing is the new functionality ("Ledger Selection is Active" in OCCI) in new release.
    Best Regards, Lawrence

  • In EBS document not get auto clear Algorithms 11

    In Electronic bank statment  document not get  clear automatically while batch run.
    I update check no to payment document.  even though it is not get auto clear.
    in OT51 assign Interpretation Algorithms 11 011:(Outgoing check: Check number not identical to document number)
    why it is not get  auto clear with check number.

    011 = Outgoing check: Check number not identical to document number
    012 = Outgoing check: Check number identical to document number
    The "document number" in the descriptions is the payment document number - the FI doc that cleared the invoice.  If you use the payment document number as the check number - and thus that is the number the bank includes in the bank statement - then you would use algorithm 012.  If you create a check in the check register that is a different number than the payment document - and the check number is the number in the bank statement - then you would use algorithm 011.
    Search SAP Help for a document titled "Interpretation Algorithms".  This document includes descriptions of all the standard interpretation algorithms.
    Regards,
    Shannon

  • SD: Condition record not getting automatically determined

    Hi,
    Condition record not getting automatically determined for a condition type for which following access is maintained.
    The access has table containing following fields:
    Sales Organisation
    Distribution Channel
    Division
    Sales Document type
    Sales Document No.
    Material no.
    Following is the scenario:
    A sales order is created  for Project Systems attach a WBS element to the line item .
    With respect to the above created sales order a Billing request ( a sales doc. type which is different than the above sales order). When the billing request is created materials appearing in the line item will be different.Different materials will appear in the billing request because of the DIP profile maintained.
    The prerequisite is that before creating billing request the sales employee has to maintain condition master record with above access.The condition record will combine sales organisation, distribution channel, division, sales document type ,
    sales document number ( the 1st refered sales order)
    and the material are different
    than the ones maintained in the 1st sales order.
    This will enable in getting billing request generated without manual intervention in pricing for other materials for which condition records have been maintained as stated above.
    Following is the error message we get
    ===================================
    " Inactive        X   Inactive via formulae of incorrect "
    Thanks
    Aby
    Message was edited by: Aby Jacob Emmanuel

    As I know, thats just a warning message(if its a std one).
    Ignore it and save.
    Check your pricing date of the document. For execution it should be similar or after valid-from date maintain in condition record.
    But, you need not create a condition record. Simply change the existing one combination of your desire. But, this warning will come there also for your combination.
    Thanks & Regards
    JP

  • With flash on I am not getting any clear photo just a dark one why?

    I am not getting any clear photos when I turn on flash just a dark image.i am getting photos clear without flash if I take one in proper light.why?please help.regards anish

    Check System Preferences > Sound > Output
    Make sure the correct device is selected.

  • MIRO for freight: freight clearing account not getting debited

    All SAP Gurus,
    We are doing MIRO for planned delivery cost (freight) and facing some problem in account determination.
    Actually the ideal cycle goes like this:
    The stock account is debited with the planned delivery costs at goods receipt and the system makes the offsetting posting to a freight clearing account. This posting is then cleared by an offsetting entry to the vendor account at invoice receipt.
    In our case accounting  entries are going correct at the time of GR.
    But at the time of MIRO insted of freight clearing account, stock account is again getting debited.
    Where may be the problem?
    Please help.
    Regards,

    Hi
    Check what are the debit and credit accounts for Freight transaction key in OBYC (check corresponding account key for freight condition in pricing procedure). If you maintain them correctly (generally we only maintain one GL account without specifying debit/credit in OBYC), then entry should be GR/IR freight clearing account debit at time of MIRO.
    Check the accounting entry in MIRO - the posting keys you are seeing (when you scroll to right hand side in accounting document you can see transaction).
    Thanks

  • Automatic clearing using MRKO

    I'm not sure whether this thread belongs in FI or MM but I just took a chance and posted it in MM.
    We have our normal GR/IR account set up for automatic clearing via F.13 once the WE and the RE are in balance.
    However, we have a different GR/IR account (211100) for our pipeline materials.  However, on the G/L side, once an MRKO document is generated, there is no clearing.  I tried to clear the WA docs against the MRKO doc,via F.13 but I was told that no clearing docs were generated.
    Is there anyway to effectively use open item management on 211100 to show which goods movements go with which MRKO doc and therefore which documents remain "open" with no liability created to the vendor.
    Any information you have would be greatly appreciated.
    thanks
    Josh

    Hi
    Can you send the steps for automatic clearing with tolerance limit
    I have done the following configuration and  still systems is showing error message difference is to large
    Define Tolerance limit for GL Account
    Define Tolerance Limit for Employee
    Assign Tolerance group to GL Master
    Define GL Account for Difference Posting
    Define Clearing Rule ( Account Assignment Basis)
    Regards
    Prem Prakash Sharma

  • Return Purchase Orders- CESS ACCOUNT NOT GET Debited in MIGO

    Dear Expert,
    We are implementing Return PO procedure for Materials.
    Business scenario :
    Goods received from vendor during Material receipt Stock Account debited and GR/IR Clearing account Credited and Cess account Credited further during Invoice Posting Material Vendor is Credited with debiting GR/IR Clearing account and Cess Vendor is get Credited by debiting CESS account
    In Case of Return Purchase Order we are sending Materials back to Vendor during Goods Issue to Vendor Stock Account Credited and GR/IR Clearing account debited but Cess account get Credited insted of debited,
    Please advice what setting can be done to debit CESS Account during goods return
    Regards,

    Hi
    Thanks for reply, vendor has to pay duty to govt if vendor is not belong to factory location
    during GR for outside vendors pay duty to govt  but naw we want to return materials to vendor at this time we also want to recover duty paid to govt.
    to make this possible we have Created vendor code for Govt creditor and condition is created with feature of delivery cost
    goods are return to vendor by creating Return PO ( as no reference document available ) and goods issue with movment type 161.
    Pls advice

  • Vendor account not associated?

    I originally installed ADE and and authorized use without a vendor account or Adobe ID.  I had to perform system restore on my laptop and ADE was removed for some reason so I had to reinstall it.  This caused me to have to create and Adobe ID.  So I registered/created an Adobe ID and password.
    Now each time I open ADE and try to read my ebook from the library, I get the error
    "The vendor account you entered is not associated with the item you are trying to open. Try again."
    When I reinstalled ADE, and I reopened it, the ebook I previously purchased was still there, now I just cannot open it. What do I do?

    If these are library books you are lucky.  Wait for the loan to expire (you wn't be able to return it early while you have this problem) and borrow it again.
    More stuck with bought books.
    This is a vicious trap that Adobe lays for unsuspecting customers.
    They do give very mild warnings, but not nearly strong enough.
    When you register 'without ID', ADE creates an anonymous/implicit ID with limited powers (eg can't be used to share with other devices).
    Whenever you first load a DRM book, that copy of the book is associated with whatever ID the computer is registered to at the time.
    Any book you load while this anonymous ID is active gets associated with that ID, and can't be read on any other device.
    When you properly register your computer with a real ID, that old anonymous ID is lost.
    Now you don't have any devices that can read the book.
    Not appropriate for you, but for completeness .....
    The only way I know round this is to use a DRM stripper such as epubee BEFORE you deauthorize the device.
    I do NOT advocate using such code to get around the valid limitations placed on a DRM book.
    However, where the problem arises only because of the ineptness of Adobe's ADEPT DRM infrastructure and its implementation,
    such a measure is totally justifiable.

  • G/L automatic clearing using f.13-Problem

    Hi
    I am trying to clear G/L using F.13 auto clearing function.Selected debit&credit item balance is not ZERO but with minor difference of 0.02.
    When I  selcted the buttin"include tolerences" and run the program it is not clearing the documents saying 0.02 is too large to clear the difference.
    I have made the following settings in SPRO.
    1.Tolerence limits were fixed to groups and id is properly assigned to the group.
    2.Defined revenue&expenditure accounts for automatic posting of differences under "settings for clearing program unders open item processing(G/L account).
    Why is it not clearing very small diff ??
    Am I correct in my understanding that "include tolerences" means SAPF124 program writes of small differences(with in tolerence limts) to defined accounts and clear the document?
    regards
    Henfi

    Hi
    Can you send the steps for automatic clearing with tolerance limit
    I have done the following configuration and  still systems is showing error message difference is to large
    Define Tolerance limit for GL Account
    Define Tolerance Limit for Employee
    Assign Tolerance group to GL Master
    Define GL Account for Difference Posting
    Define Clearing Rule ( Account Assignment Basis)
    Regards
    Prem Prakash Sharma

  • Re: Premium did not get automatically upgraded

    A few changes to your Premium account
    Group video calling is now free. But as a big thanks for being a Premium subscriber, we're giving you calling to countries around the world at no extra cost. 
    That means you'll get all the perks of Premium, plus unlimited1calls to phones in over 60 countries/regions — all for the same rate you're paying now.
    Here’s what you'll now get…
    Unlimited1 calls to mobiles in 8 countries/regions and landlines in 63—s
    Up to 10 people together on a group video call.2
    Live chat support when you need it.3
    The same great ad-free4 Skype you’re used to.
    What's next?
     account will be automatically updated, so you don't have to do a thing.
     questions? Let us know.
    As you can see, the email I received above must be the same as all the others here; it's quite specific that no further action from me is required and unlimited world is what's being offered.
    I made a call to the US and WAS charged!!!!
    The "Live Chat" support option's a joke, nothing happens, no chat window appears, it would make a lot of sense if they simply used chat on skype to contact you, would it not.
    Seems ironic that a company specializing in communications has such a hard time communicating with their paying customers!!!

    Hello
    Your subscription will be automatically upgraded on the next renewal date. More details here: https://support.skype.com/en/faq/FA34454/what-s-new-with-group-video-calling
    Check your subscription renewal date on your Skype web account "Subscription settings" page: www.skype.com/go/myaccount
    If you don't wish to wait until then please contact Skype customer service who will upgrade it for you now.
    TIME ZONE - US EASTERN. LOCATION - PHILADELPHIA, PA, USA.
    I recommend that you always run the latest Skype version: Windows & Mac
    If my advice helped to fix your issue please mark it as a solution to help others.
    Please note that I generally don't respond to unsolicited Private Messages. Thank you.

  • Search Help for Vendor Feild not getting populated in the Screen Element

    Hi Everyone,
    In transaction Miro, I get a POP-UP for Invoicing Party i.e. Vendor and Users required a custom search help.
    The Search help for Vendor(LIFNR) is KRED_C and i appended a Z search help under this.
    Now that the search help exists and I can drill down the values too but when i select/choose any value,  that value is not getting populated in Screen feild.
    is there any validation I need to do for this.
    Please suggest me... I checked SDN there are many things but i couldn't figure out wat i need to do and where I need to modify.
    Regards,
    Raj

    Dear Hema,
    Could you please tell me how many internal tables you are using to store the data for display.
    I observerd that you have lt_stock and lt_mat2 declared in the part of the program
    >DATA: lv_stock TYPE lty_stock.
    >DATA: ltmat2 TYPE TABLE OF lty_mat.
    you have displayed above, however you are also using ls_stock and lv_stock .
    >IF p_ztotal = ' '. "line
    >WRITE 18 ls_stock-matnr.
    >WRITE 38 lv_stock-strgr.
    >
    >ELSEIF ztotal = 'S'.                             "subtotal
        >WRITE: 15 ls_stock-nrmit.
        >WRITE 32 lv_stock-dispo.                    
        >WRITE 43 lv_stock-fevor.                      
      >ELSE.                                            "total
        >WRITE: 15 'TOTAL'(016), ls_stock-prgrp.
    >
      >ENDIF.
    Are those for displaying some other information?
    Also the problem of display you are facing can also be because there are no records to be displayed which satisfies the selection criteria.
    Best Regards,
    Rajesh.
    Please reward points if found helpful.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Qosmio X300 -130 and Vista 64-bit - On screen Display doesn't work

    Hi there, I recently bought a Qosmio X300-130 notebook which shipped with Vista Home Premium. The problem was that I could not get onto our domain at the office. So installed Vista Business 64-bit. I found all of the drivers online and everything wor

  • XSLT 2.0 (works in jdev, but not on server) Reasons?

    I created a xslt script to get a date difference. following blogs online - i modified the xsl:stylesheet to 2.0.                       WHen its tested in Jdev with   2002-11-26T09:50:39  2013-10-26T09:50:39 returns   P3987D when I deploy it to the SO

  • When I launch Premier Pro is says this program has encounter a problem and will now close. ??

    PP will not open. It want to close as soon as I launch it??? I have updated it to the last version.

  • Equivalent of null for CLOB in a view

    Hi, I am trying to create a view using union. One table has a column of CLOB type. The other table doesn't have this column so I am trying to select null like select a_clob from a union select null from b Its giving me an error "ORA-01790 expression

  • ODI Q.

    John- I am trying to install ODI 10.1.3.5.0. I downloaded the required setup from edelivery as per your blog http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/2008/09/odi-series-part- 1.html & i have ran the set up. I was going through your blog & it says to copy ove