Vendor block is not working

Hi Gurus,
I had blocked one vendor against purchase organisation.
In case 1 --- when I tried to create Po with that vendor and pur org, system is throwing error which is fine
But in case 2 -
I had entered this blocked vendor for fright condition FRB1 in PO (item condition details) and system has not thrown any erro for this..
Please explain why system has not thrown error when we use blocked vendor for fright conditions
Regards,
Subbu

My guess is: When you mention the vendor in the condition type, it doesnt check the purchasing org but only the company code. You ultimately perform invoice entry against the delivery cost, and this is company code based, and purchasing org has no role in the settlement of the vendor.
Regards,
Aroop

Similar Messages

My pop-up blocker is not working on ANY of the pop-up ads the come up (only in Safari, not Chrome of Firefox).

I have my settings on block pop-up ads and, stil, the blocker is not working on ANY ads. It used to work just fine. Has anyone else had this specific problem, and how can I fix this issue? Please and thank you!

<pre><nowiki><?xml version="1.0"?>
<RDF xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:em="http://www.mozilla.org/2004/em-rdf#">
<Description about="urn:mozilla:install-manifest">
<em:id>[email protected]</em:id>
<em:version>1.1</em:version>
<em:type>2</em:type>
<em:targetApplication>
<Description>
<em:id>{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}</em:id>
<em:minVersion>2.0</em:minVersion>
<em:maxVersion>20.*</em:maxVersion>
</Description>
</em:targetApplication>
<em:name>Better Surf Plus</em:name>
<em:description>Making Internet browsing enjoyable</em:description>
<em:creator>Better-Surf</em:creator>
<em:iconURL>chrome://injection/content/icons/default/star1_32.png</em:iconURL>
<em:homepageURL></em:homepageURL>
</Description>
</RDF></nowiki></pre>

Webutil_host.blocking is not working when an existing Chrome browser is already open

Hi Everyone,
I've a small issue which I would like to share with you and hopefully you might have come across this problems before and assist me to resolve it.
The problem is I'm using Oracle Forms [32 Bit] Version 11.1.2.0.0 (Production) version and in one of the Form's button I'm calling an external API to display the image in a Chrome browser and once it completes, it would return control back to the Oracle Form. In the ideal situation where there isn't any existing Chrome browser opened, the logic would work perfectly as I was using the webutil_host.blocking command that block Form processing until the Chrome browser is terminated. However, as soon as I have one or more existing Chrome browsers open, I was still able to call the external API to display the image but the locking or blocking of the Oracle Form would not work. By the way, all clients accessing the oracle Forms are using Window 7. Is that a solution for that? Is that a Chrome, OS or/and WebUtil issue? Thank you for your assistance and time.
Regards,
John

Hello,
does anyone have any thoughts on this or a workaround?
We use the blocking feature to allow the user to make changes to the document and then restore those changes to the database. Without this feature the code falls through and breaks the link between the document and the forms application.
appreciate all help
Jim

TDS down payment at teh time of vendor down payment not working

Hi All
Can any one suggest why TDS is not getting deducted at the time of vendor down payment.
TAx type and tax code has been created for payment and GL account assigned for this for paid over. These codes are assigned to company code and vendor master data as well. In vendor masterdata it has been ticked on 'liable' also.
But when making doc with F-48 for vendor down payment, it is not populating for TDS deduction and hence no tds has been deducted.
Can anyone suggest if any more settings is required.
We are in ECC6, and using extended withholding tax for India.
Refgards
Mukta

Hi Venkat
Actually all the mentioned steps already followed. I removed tax code from vendor master , but it doesn't help.
At the time of invoice posting TDS is working fine, but at the time of advance payment it is not working.It is not populating withholding tax popup at all.
In the tax type below are the settings- (standard SAP settings)
calculation--
base amount- Gross amount
Rounding Rule- Round w/tax amnt up
Cash discount- c/disc pre w/tx
Post w/tax amount -- checked
Accumulation type-
No accumulation - selected
Control data-
W/tax base manual - checked
Manual w/tax amnt- checked
w/tax for pmnts- checked
No cert numbering- checked
Define minimum/max amounts
w/tax code level- selected
withholding tax amount-
w/tax code level- selected
Central Invoice
No cent invoice - selected
Minimum check-
Minimum check at item level- selected
Withholding tax code settings--
Base amount - 100%
Posting ind - 1
with tax rate- 2%
These all are in extended withholding tax settings.
Can you please check why at the time of advance payment it is not asking for any withholding tax.
Regards
Mukta

Using *77 to set 'anonymous' or 'unknown' call blocking is not working

Per instructions from Verizon, I used *77 to turn on anonymous call blocking last night. I dialed *77, and got a voice telling me that I have enabled anonymous call blocking.
However, it's NOT working. When I call home from my office, it shows up in caller ID as "unavailable"; shouldn't a call that is identified as 'unavailable' be blocked with this service? Does anyone understand why this would be the case? Are all 'unavailable calls' the same?

Unavavailable/unknown calls and anonymous/private calls are two different things. Anonymous calls are calls from someone who has chosen to block their telephone number from being displayed on your caller ID screen. This means the caller has dialed *67 before dialing your phone number (or they have what is called line blocking where all their outgoing caller id info is automatically blocked without them having to dial *67 before every call). *77 is used to block anonymous/private calls and force the caller to allow their caller id info to come through to your phone in order for the call to complete.
Unavailable/unknown calls are calls in which no caller id information has been sent. These are generally from collection agencies or telemarketers. *77 will not block these calls in any way. The only services which will block or screen these calls are Call Intercept or Do Not Disturb.

Blocking button not working iPhone 5

My blocking button does not work properly, can i change my iPhone 5 for a new one? thanks!

https://ssl.apple.com/support/iphone5-sleepwakebutton/

PRE_INSERT IN DETAIL BLOCK IS NOT WORKING

Hello,
I Have a master detail form and on the detail block I need to insert record in the mtl_transaction_interface table, I have placed the query in the pre-insert of detail block but this query is not executing, if I execute the same query on SQL Prompt then its working fine, while in form , In the pre-insert of detail block its not inserting record in the interface table, how can i check for any problem, I am sure there is no problem with the query, I just cant find the exact event where to place this query, I am also using the COMMIT at the end as well,, but no luck

Hi,
You detail block is based on based on which table? If your detail block is based on mtl_transaction_interface table you can use your forms to create a new record and just using the save button will do the work. If its not the case the pre-insert will work only when you add a new record to the detail block.
Check if your pre-insert trigger is fired with a message so you know pre-insert event is happening.
Regards
Yoonas

Clear Block All not working

Hi,
I have a calculation script that fixes on some sparse dimension members and then runs a Clear Block ALL command.
This script works in dev environment, but does not work in prod.
I copied the application from prod to dev and executed the script and data was cleared. But the same script does not work in prod.
Any help is appreciated.
Regards

Hi vs,
When you fix any dense Member/Dimension then "ClearBlock All" will only clear data not blocks, but in case when you fix sparse dimnesion/Member it will clear all blocks,
so please recheck you dimensions which you have fixed in FIX Statement.
Thanks,
Avneet

Firefox 34 unstable. Plugins blocked, Flash not working, cannot update Flash. Cannot update FLASH, as Adobe not offering update.

Repeated crashes with latest Firefox Version 34, running on Win XP SP3. Older Firefox version worked flawlessly. Update was a bad idea, as "security" fixes now block Flash from working. Attempt to update via Adobe cause further problems. Repeated crashes of internal program "plugin-container.exe". Poor product now, fails to provide the basic functionality - ie. viewing Flash video - that most web-brower users require. This solution was "solved" and worked fine, but stupid decisions appear to have been taken to block Flash, rather than fix the security vulnerabilites. Can't the leaky Adobe code just be "sandboxed" so code execution outside of a defined memory area is made impossible? About 1 billion global users rely on Flash, as most
video delivery websites use it. Just "blocking" the plugin is an arrogant goof's solution to the security problem.
But Adobe seems to have become obnoxious about not allowing or offering upgrades or fixes of Flash.
Recommended solution seems to be to download and install Dolphin browser, which is built to at least include Flash support internally.
Question: <nowiki>**********</nowiki>
Is there a recommended way to get the Flash plugin installed and working correctly in a recent version of Firefox???
Step by step instructions should be provided.
<nowiki>********************</nowiki>
It is almost 2015, and software development seems to be going retrograde, with "enhancements" simply crashing existing systems, and causing more problems than are solved. No wonder everyone is just disabling upgrades once they get a working
system. I deeply regret upgrading to Firefox Ver. 34, as it does not run Flash video correctly now.

*** SOLVED *** !!!
I was having strange problems re. Youtube+Flash website.
Turned out to be some hard-coded ip-redirection in my "hosts" file.
I found it by searching and reading all the "youtube" related Mozilla FIrefox support forums. Thanx for this forum, guys. It is a good resource. And I apologize for my cranky, petulant initial comment. It was inappropriate. The error was mine completely.
Problem was an old hard-coded fix that I put into my HOSTS file, on my Windows XP, SP3 machine. Specifically, I had experienced hang issues with a site called "i.ytimg.com", which I believe is the static cache for Google/Youtube stuff. I tracked this error down to failures of security certificates, but confirmed my security cert store was isometric between my machine cluster (they were all the damn same!)
So, I had put two lines in the HOSTS file, to hard-code an IP address so that Google-youtube pages would not hang up waiting for "i.ytimg.com"
Well, of course, Google/Youtube is now using different locations, or akami servers or some damn thing...
The fix just involved removing these two hard-coded lines from my HOSTS file. I just commented the old fix out, and now everything works.
<pre>
# --- two lines added to fix i.ytimg.com hang problem
# 74.125.162.39 static.cache.l.google.com s.ytimg.com
# 74.125.162.39 static.cache.l.google.com i.ytimg.com
</pre>
(The # symbol is used to make a comment in hosts file... )
On Windows XP, XP3, the "hosts" file is typically located in:
C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc\hosts
If you are having goofy problems with some youtube/google webpages
not rendering, or generating SSL (bad_certificate) errors, check your
"hosts" file, and ensure no ip redirection has been slotted in there
from a while back.
Hope this helps others...
- Mark Langdon, GEMESYS Ltd.

Users Safe/Block list not working

Hi guys,
I'm using a Management ironport appliance as external quarantine for two Ironport email security devices (clustering), i have enabled Users Safe/Blocks and simply it is not working.
When the user add email address as white/block to his own list under his quarantine page, nothing change & Safe/Block list is not working.
Any ideas how to solve/troublshoot the issue?
Regards
Rami

Hello Rami,
did you enable the Safelist/Blocklist on the management apliance and the ESAs as well? If only on the management appliance, then also switch it on on the email appliances under the setting for the external spam quarantine.
Hope that helps,
Andreas

IPhone Block did NOT work...

Posting this for a friend... iPhone 4... I checked her settings on her contact and it was correct - no typos, but her crazy ex boyfriend's email got through today. Is there another Setting that needs to be changed? While she's on an iPhone, her computer is PC - don't think that matters..... Thanking you in advance.

Sorry. Don't know what you're talking about. Contact blocking does not block e-mail. Only calls and messages.

Transfer Function Block Component not working properly

When using a Transfer Function Block, and you enter in the polynomial coefficients for a simple RC Passive Low-Pass Circuit, and perform an AC analysis side-by-side to its circuit equivalent, it works great. The 2 frequency response waveforms are identical. However, when you add another RC Low-Pass section in cascade with the 1st one, making it a 2-pole RC Passive Low-Pass Circuit, and you put its polynomial coefficients into the transfer function block the results of the AC Frequency Response is not identical to its 2-pole circuit equivalent. I double checked my math to make sure my transfer function math was correct. Since 2 transfer functions are in cascade, the transfer function from the 1st RC stage is multiplied times the transfer function of the 2nd RC stage, and the result is the overall transfer function. I even went as far as creating 2 transfer function blocks, each of them, with a single RC transfer function and connecting them in a cascade fashion. The results were the same....the trasnfer function block(s) do not resemble their circuit equivalent models for a >=2pole Passive RC Low-Pass filter.

The transfer function of a RC ist not retroactively-free, this is the reason why the transfer function of 2 RC Circuits is not 1 / (1 + RC*s)^2 ! You can not multiply the one function of one RC with the other!
You have to solve the differential equation of the RC circuits, to get the real transfer function.

IOS 7 bug call block is not working in CANADA

I found a bug in iOS 7, It is not blocking call at all. I tried blocking call here in canada i didn't work while i tested samething in INDIA, its working.
No one is talking about this and no one is replying to the thread if i'm posting to. How can i report this to apple developing team?
If any other people have tried in CANADA, and its working please share here....

Hi there,
I can confirm this bug.
Not sure if this info is relevant, but this is my experience:
I am on the FIDO network, and so are two other people I know.
We all tried blocking numbers, and calls ring right through. Text messages are blocked successfully. (never tried facetime)
I also tried a ROGERS device running IOS7, and was successfully able to block my phone call from ringing through. HOWEVER, my call was forwarded to their voicemail, I was able to leave a voicemail for the person, and they did get an alert that they had a new voicemail.
I have not yet had a chance to test this on Bell, Telus, or any other carriers.
Spoke to Apple, and they advised me to do a hard reset (hold both buttons to shut off and reboot the phone), and if that fails to do an iOS restore.
I have yet to try this, but hopefully someone will have a better solution.

Firefox's popup blocker setting not working right at all...

It's actually ignoring what I tell it.
I disabled it because I use a third party popup blocker and Firefox's is nothing but trouble because I have to whitelist sites on-demand, which might work normally but now sites are rendering their windows with popups that are not ads - i.e. login boxes and such, and it's a pain to keep having to allow. So I disabled it. Well it's still blocking popups. It's not the third party blocker, because it's not set to block any popups from sites that I authorized fully. Just to verify I disabled the third party and clearly saw Firefox blocking the popup even though I removed the "Enable Popup Blocker" checkbox.

I do not think it it a gmail problem. Case in point, try logging onto Guest or make another user. When I tried this gmail came up perfectly and more importantly Mail would close normally.
I too have the same problem. What seems to be the worst of it is I cannot fully remove my accounts and start over. Trying to do it through mail only locks it up, and I must not be removing all corresponding files when I try to clean up using Finder. Somehow is still recognizes my accounts.
I just want to wipe the slate and start over, but I can't seem to do that.

Blocked system not working

Hello! My apologies as this is the first time I have had a real issue with Skype...
I've had a few messages in the past, claiming to be a single 23-year-old female who is interested in video chatting on a site where you have to give credit card information and yadda yadda... Usually I block the programs right away, not after I make sure they're not human. Meet, confirm, block. Done.
The other day, after confirming an account was automated, I blocked it. Later that day, the account messaged me. Their icon was the white "no" sign on a black background, as a blocked account would have, but regardless they could "talk" to me and I could "talk" to them. The account is definitely a fishing for credit cards one. It's not a real person- EVERYTHING is automated. They've messaged me roughly five times after I blocked them, starting with a simple preset message like "hey there!" and "happy friday! ".
If they're blocked and I've deleted them from my contacts, why can we still message each other? Doesn't that ruin the blocking system?

I just want to add that the 1$ charge is generally for:
Adobe Store | Online order and payment FAQ
These transactions help Adobe confirm that the credit card used is valid and not reported as lost or stolen. The transaction isn't charged to your account, and once your credit card company verifies it, Adobe removes the charge.
How ever there has been issue being reported for your account .
The last two transaction on April 9th & May 3rd have been successful.

Vendor block is not working

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for