Vendor blocking scenario in QIR-EWM Integration

Hi ,
We have the following scenario with QM and EWM Integration , So could you pleas let me know for any suggestions
1. Create two materials for ex. 259 and 581 with same vendor with control key Z100
2. Create a purchase order for both the materials 259 and 581 and create the inbound delivery for the same so that It passes to EWM…mean while the vendor loses license for one material i.e. 259
3. Go to QI02 (T Code) change info record for 259 material and make it as total block
4. Now the EWM shouldn’t post the document and it should give the error for quality
5. Second material 581 should get posted without quality reasons
Thanks
Bala

Sorry.. to the best of my knowledge, standard SAP checks on the vendor block ends at the PO creation and release. You'll have to identify a user exit to check on the vendor block at GR in EWM.
Craig

Similar Messages

Vendor block in SRM

Dear experts,
I currently do not have a system available, therefore I need an answer to a basic question:
Which vendor blocks (Company code, Purchasing or both) do affect the visibility of the vendor in SRM in SRM 7.0 classic scenario?
Appreciate your help.
Cheers, T.

Hello Toppika,
Only vendor purchasing blocks (for all purchasing organizations or only selected purchasing organization) are relevant in SRM.
No relation exist in SRM between supplier and company code (R/3 Posting block).
Regards.
Laurent.

Vendor block list

Hi,
1. When new vendor transfer to GTS system, for SPL which scenario need to run A1 or B1,
2. I want to get all vendor block list due to result of B1 scenario, it has to go User mail Id
regards
satish

Hi Satish,
When business partners are transferred to GTS, the first screen must be A1. This can be configured to happen automatically or manually. The system should not allow a B1 screening on "new" master data.
Easiest way to get result you need in item 2 of your question is to execute the report "Display Audit Trail for Business Partners". Select "Check Scenario" = 'B1' and select a variable for "Outcome of System Check" that will show blocked partners. When the report displays, you can export it in excel format. If you want to automate that process and email it to someone, you can execute the report in a batch mode, then use the suggestion provided by Tobias with transaction SUGR.
Cheers !
-Greg

Qty Blocking scenario related to GR Based Invoice Verification

Friends,
I'm facing issues related to automatic deletion of Qty blocking reason during LIV.
Scenario is like below:
GR1 Qty = 5
IR1 Qty = 7
This invoice is posted by system but blocked for payment due to Qty variance.
Expectation is that store person should GR for balance 2 qty.
However even when this additional GR is posted, it is appearing as separate line item in PO History also and is not linked to IR1 and qty block against that invoice remains as it is there and it can not be released in MRBR automatic release functionality.
However, it's working fine in case if there is No GR Based IN activated for PO Line item.
is it a standard thing that we can't implement Qty blocking scenario ( & obviously it's auto release after reqd GR ) for GR Based IV scene.

Thanks PRIYA for prompt reply as usual.
You are right , system will expect additional GR for diff qty.
However issue is that even I post this additional GR for 2 qty , system is not relasing this blocked invoice automatically in MRBR automatic release function.
However, if i test same scenario for PO item NOT having GR based-IV tick...system automatically release such qty blocked invoice in MRBR once it find additional GR posted against same PO line item.
But i case of GR based IV, system is not linking this additional GR to pending qty blocked invoice.
just FYI, However invoice blcoking due to price variance is working fine ( iwth reqd PO Line item price change, system is able to release this price blocked invoice automatically in MRBR automatic release function.
I believe you might have qty blocking scenario for GR Based IV cases in your any of previous projects. if yes, pls advise me.
Thanks in advance.

Vendor block on goods receipt

When trying to do a goods receipt, i get a vednor block error message. I have checked the vendor master.. there are no blocks and i also checked the MP02 to see if there were any QI blocks... none. I am thinking this is the QI inf record...
Where else colud I check for a vendor block.
Thanks in advance

thanks for the response.
But here is the solution i found out. The po's were created on the MPN part numbers and the vendor in tcode MP02 for this part number was different from the vendor on the PO.
I was checking the blocks on the vendor on the PO, it was the vendor on the MPN number that need to be blocked

Vendor block code for release order creation but no purchase order creation

The client has a vendor block code which when applied to a vendor through vendor block screen should allow release order creations against existing contracts and ARC but it should not allow purchase order creation. However, it is allowing purchase order creation also. Can anyone tell how to achieve this selective treatment that allows RO creation against existing contracts and ARCs' but no PO creation.
Are there any settings or configurations that have to be made in SPRO and other areas to achieve this.I would appreiate if anyone could give in a detailed and step wise solution.

Hi
Take out all the blocks on company code and purchasing organization in XK05.
Only put block function as 01 (purchase order). It will not allow you to create purchase order but you can create contracts and release orders against contracts.
Thanks
Edited by: Praveen Raghavendra on Jan 8, 2009 2:30 PM

Vendor Blocked for Local Purchase Organization

Hi,
I have checked the vendor details in SRM and ECC. The vendor is not locked in SRM & ECC, still the User is getting the Error message that Vendor Blocked for Local Purchase Organization.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Lovkesh

Hello,
To prevent a shopping cart being created with blocked vendors, you shall
make an implementation in BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI. This badi is called for
each refresh of ITS screen. Here
Call FM BBP_ITEM_GETDETAIL by supplying IV_DOC_GUID
The FM will return among others a table E_PARTNER.
select the corresponding partner related to E_PARTNER from table BUT000
Check weather the BUT000-XBLCK and E_PARTNER are matching
If yes, Fill ET_MESSAGES with an error message.
I hope this information help.
Thanks and regards,
Gaurav

Configuration Scenario for BPM Using Integration Scenario

hi All,
I Have an Scenario where i am using BPM. Most of the blog tells about manually creating all Configuration objects. I had created an Integration Scenario for this scenario by referring to the earlier threads available for same.
Hoe to Create Integration Scenario for BPM Scenario
Integration Scenario in BPM and few more.
My IS looks like
Sender App Component - Integration Process - Receiver App Component
Now when i am trying to create Configuration scenario for same using model configurator, i am getting Model as "Not Configurable"
And when i click "Configurability Check" Button, i am getting below as status:
Component view IS_POC_BPM: Connection from receivePayload to getABSPayload does not have an inbound service interface
Component view IS_POC_BPM : Connection from sendABSPayload to getPayload has no outbound interface
getABSPayload and sendABSPayload are actions for Abstract interfaces.
IS_POC_BPM is the Integration Process Name.
Also in Integration Scenario, when i create connection between sender action to BPM action there is no inbound interface coming. And viceversa.
Please help me in identifying if i am doing any thing wrong in creating this scenario.
Is it possible to create Configuration Scenario for BPM Using Integration Scenario?
Thanks,
Mayank
Edited by: Mayank Gupta on Apr 21, 2010 6:35 AM

I think you shoudl refer the available Integration Scenarios created for BPMs in IR --> SAP BASIS --> http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/Patterns
Sender template will have the Action with Outbound Service Interface and then in the BPM Template the action will have Inbound Interface.....then within the BPM itself this inbound will be mapped to Action with Abstract Interface
may be after looking the Integration scenarios you will get more idea
Regards,
Abhishek.

What is the best way to follow the scenario for Out look integration with share point using SAP Gateway?

1)what is the best way to follow the scenario for Out look integration with share point using SAP Gateway?
2)workflow concepts for Purchase order?
3)Email triggering from out look for an approval process of PO? how these scenario can be best implemented with updated functions in Duet Enterprise.

Hi,
I do not have much idea on gateway integration with outlook but found out this document GWPAM Workflow Template which can be helpful for you to start with.
also you may want to post your question in SAP Microsoft Interoperability forum
Regards,
Chandra

Vendor Blocks in SRM

Hi Guru's.
Please can someone explain what system changes we need to make so that a errror message is displayed during Cart creation to tell user that a Vendor is Blocked. The message only appears on the PO screen and it is our requirement to make the user aware during the Cart creation process.
Our vendor blocks are maintained in R/3 and sync'ed across to SRM 5.0
Please advise.
Thank you.
Viju

Hi Viju,
You can check the table BUT000. Here if the field XBLCK is set then that indicates that the vendor is blocked.
Now use the BAdI BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI to generate the error message when you are trying to create the Cart.
Do the coding under the object type BUS2121.
Thanks,
Pradeep

Activate Integration Scenario for import at Integration Directory

Hello all,
How can i (or is the workaround) activate a message mapping / interface mapping without configured messagemapping at "Display Message Mapping" side? When i try to activate the not already configured message mapping i get following errors: Source message missing, Target message missing, Metadata missing, Mapping not sufficiently defined.
Cause:
First i want to build the frame at Integration Repository for the defined scenario and import at Integration Directory. Later i want to build the message mapping for the scenario.
Many thanks in advanced!
Jochen

Hi,
you cannot activate it without all proper values - sorry
have a look at this blog:
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/08/27/modeling-integration-scenario146s-in-xi
Regards,
michal
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions">XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</a>

SCENARIO IN ID AND INTEGRATION SCEANARIO IN IR

Hi experts,
Pl let me know "What is the difference between SCENARIO in ID and INTEGRATION SCENARIO in IR. When and where we opt one among them. How they r not same."

hi Leo,
Pl let me know "What is the difference between SCENARIO in ID and INTEGRATION SCENARIO in IR>>
The INTEGRATION Scenario which we make in IR is same as the SCENARIO in ID .How let me tell u...
u make intergration scenario and under that actions etc..... in ID u can import the integration scenario....Then u don't need to create any Scenario in ID....
It is not necessary to create integration scenario in IR... u can directly create it in ID.
see below... how u can import an integration scenario from IR..using wizard...
CCT
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/11/fileToIDOC&
regards
biplab

Vendor master scenario

Hi All
I am new to MDM and trying to study it through documents, blogs, help etc. I just have a overview of how MDM works, various components etc.
I don't have server installed.
We are supposed to think for vendor master scenario. How will it get implemented in MDM
Can you please provide me inputs for how should we start for this scenario. How should we begin doing paper work at least, since server is not in a place? How should we plan creation of repository and etc ?
Thanks in advance
Waiting for your inputs, ideas, suggestion.
Mugdha Kulkarni

Hi Tim
Do u mean this page which enlists links to various guides ?
https://websmp208.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=00200797470000065902&_OBJECT=011000358700004121872006E
Can you please specify exact link to any documents which will help us building vendor master scenario? As of now we don't have server installed and trying to imagine the whole thing. So I will be very thankful if you can provide documents related to vendor master scenario on my mail ID [email protected] ?
Thanks in advance

Vendors block list

hi
i need logic to develop vendors block list

Hi,
use the below code for vendor block list.
REPORT ZMMUVEND NO STANDARD PAGE HEADING LINE-SIZE 70
MESSAGE-ID ZM.
**-- DATA DECLARATIONS
DATA: V_PATH LIKE RLGRAP-FILENAME,
 V_MODE VALUE 'N'.
**- INTERNAL TABLE DECLARATIONS
DATA: BEGIN OF IT_DATA OCCURS 0,
 LIFNR(10),
 END OF IT_DATA.
DATA: BEGIN OF BDCDATA OCCURS 0.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE BDCDATA.
DATA: END OF BDCDATA.
DATA: BEGIN OF IT_OUTPUT OCCURS 0,
 LIFNR(10),
 V_TEXT(70),
 END OF IT_OUTPUT.
**-- SELECTION-SCREEN
SELECTION-SCREEN: BEGIN OF BLOCK B1 WITH FRAME TITLE TEXT-001.
PARAMETERS: P_PATH LIKE IBIPPARMS-PATH OBLIGATORY.
SELECTION-SCREEN: END OF BLOCK B1.
PARAMETERS: P_CHECK AS CHECKBOX.
AT SELECTION-SCREEN
AT SELECTION-SCREEN ON VALUE-REQUEST FOR P_PATH.
CALL FUNCTION 'F4_FILENAME'
 EXPORTING
 PROGRAM_NAME = SYST-REPID
 DYNPRO_NUMBER = SYST-DYNNR
 FIELD_NAME = 'P_PATH '
 IMPORTING
 FILE_NAME = P_PATH.
**-- START-OF-SELECTION.
START-OF-SELECTION.
**- Authorization Check
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'ZMMUVEND'
 ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '16'.
IF SY-SUBRC NE 0 .
MESSAGE E398(00) WITH TEXT-012.
ENDIF.
**- Read File
PERFORM READ_DATA.
IF P_CHECK IS INITIAL.
**- Update the data
PERFORM UPDATE_DATA.
ENDIF.
**-- TOP-OF-PAGE
PERFORM WRITE_HEADER.
**-- END-OF-SELECTION
END-OF-SELECTION.
IF P_CHECK IS INITIAL.
PERFORM WRITE_OUTPUT.
ELSE.
FORMAT COLOR COL_NORMAL ON.
LOOP AT IT_DATA.
WRITE:/1 '|',
 2 IT_DATA-LIFNR,
 14 '|',
 70 '|'.
ENDLOOP.
ULINE.
ENDIF.
*& Form READ_DATA
FORM READ_DATA.
CLEAR: V_PATH.
MOVE P_PATH TO V_PATH.
CALL FUNCTION 'WS_UPLOAD'
 EXPORTING
 FILENAME = V_PATH
 FILETYPE = 'DAT'
 TABLES
 DATA_TAB = IT_DATA.
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
 MESSAGE E001 WITH TEXT-002.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.
*& Form UPDATE_DATA
FORM UPDATE_DATA.
LOOP AT IT_DATA.
CLEAR: BDCDATA. REFRESH: BDCDATA.
**- Block Vendors
perform bdc_dynpro using 'SAPMF02K' '0500'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_OKCODE'
 '/00'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_CURSOR'
 'RF02K-LIFNR'.
perform bdc_field using 'RF02K-LIFNR'
 IT_DATA-LIFNR.
perform bdc_dynpro using 'SAPMF02K' '0510'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_OKCODE'
 'UPDA'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_CURSOR'
 'LFA1-SPERM'.
perform bdc_field using 'LFA1-SPERR'
 'X'.
perform bdc_field using 'LFA1-SPERM'
 'X'.
CALL TRANSACTION 'XK05' USING BDCDATA MODE V_MODE.
CLEAR: IT_OUTPUT.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
MOVE IT_DATA-LIFNR TO IT_OUTPUT-LIFNR.
MOVE TEXT-005 TO IT_OUTPUT-V_TEXT.
ELSE.
MOVE IT_DATA-LIFNR TO IT_OUTPUT-LIFNR.
MOVE TEXT-006 TO IT_OUTPUT-V_TEXT.
ENDIF.
**- Vendor - Mark for deletion
CLEAR: BDCDATA. REFRESH: BDCDATA.
perform bdc_dynpro using 'SAPMF02K' '0500'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_OKCODE'
 '/00'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_CURSOR'
 'RF02K-LIFNR'.
perform bdc_field using 'RF02K-LIFNR'
 IT_DATA-LIFNR.
perform bdc_dynpro using 'SAPMF02K' '0520'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_OKCODE'
 '/00'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_CURSOR'
 'LFA1-LOEVM'.
perform bdc_field using 'LFA1-LOEVM'
 'X'.
perform bdc_dynpro using 'SAPMF02K' '0520'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_OKCODE'
 'UPDA'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_CURSOR'
 'RF02K-LIFNR'.
CALL TRANSACTION 'XK06' USING BDCDATA MODE V_MODE.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
CONCATENATE IT_OUTPUT-V_TEXT TEXT-007 INTO IT_OUTPUT-V_TEXT.
ELSE.
CONCATENATE IT_OUTPUT-V_TEXT TEXT-008 INTO IT_OUTPUT-V_TEXT.
ENDIF.
APPEND IT_OUTPUT.
ENDLOOP.
ENDFORM. " UPDATE_DATA
FORM BDC_DYNPRO USING PROGRAM DYNPRO.
CLEAR BDCDATA.
BDCDATA-PROGRAM = PROGRAM.
BDCDATA-DYNPRO = DYNPRO.
BDCDATA-DYNBEGIN = 'X'.
APPEND BDCDATA.
ENDFORM.
FORM BDC_FIELD USING FNAM FVAL.
CLEAR BDCDATA.
BDCDATA-FNAM = FNAM.
BDCDATA-FVAL = FVAL.
APPEND BDCDATA.
ENDFORM.
*& Form WRITE_OUTPUT
FORM WRITE_OUTPUT.
FORMAT COLOR COL_NORMAL ON.
LOOP AT IT_OUTPUT.
WRITE:/1 '|',
 2 IT_OUTPUT-LIFNR,
 14 '|',
 15 IT_OUTPUT-V_TEXT,
 70 '|'.
ENDLOOP.
ULINE.
FORMAT COLOR OFF.
ENDFORM. " WRITE_OUTPUT
*& Form WRITE_HEADER
FORM WRITE_HEADER.
FORMAT COLOR COL_TOTAL ON.
WRITE:/2 TEXT-009.
FORMAT COLOR OFF.
FORMAT COLOR COL_HEADING ON.
ULINE.
WRITE:/1 '|',
 2 TEXT-010,
 14 '|',
 15 TEXT-011,
 70 '|'.
ULINE.
ENDFORM. " WRITE_HEADER
if this code is useful to u please reward points.
Regards,
Koti

Mass Vendor Block

Hello experts
XK05 is use for vendor block one at a time. Is there any way we can block Mas vendor in one time?

ok you are talking abbount account group, the forth field from top in XK01 transaction
A block can be set at general level or for a spcific purchasing organisation.
If you want set the block at general level, then you have to choose LFA1 table in XK99, for the purchasing org specific block you need to choose LFM1 table.
Example for general level block:
go XK99,
select table LFA1 and execute.
Then you come to the selection screen, which shows only the vendor number, but you can add many more fields as selection fields by clicking the button for selection fields below the selection.
Select the fields of your choice and copy.
Then enter your selections and execute.
you now get the found records with some columns. you probably will not directly see the field for blocking there. Hence click the button "choose fields" and copy the field to the display.
Now enter the new value above the list. then click the header of this field to select the filed as relevant to be changed.
then click button change field values.
Finally save.

Vendor blocking scenario in QIR-EWM Integration

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for