Vendor changed during the MIRO

Hi All,
My client is doing MIRO with reference to the PO. But the FI document thus generated is picking a different vendor than in the PO.What could be the reason? I have checked, all the partner functions are identical and are same as the vendor in the PO, there is no configuration for HO in the vendor master, also there is no configuration for alternative payee in the vendor master.
Please help me out.
Thanks/Regards
Debabrata

Hi,
In MIRO screen there are several tabs from one of that tab there is one field called Invoicing party, so make sure vendor selected and invoicing party are same.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi.

Similar Messages

Vendor Reconcilation account change during the document posting

Hello Experts,
I have one doubt about the Vendor Reconcilation account change during the document posting.
Is there any way/possibility to change the vendor reconcillation account during the document posting, for a particular vendor.
If is there any chance please let me know the way how to change it and also letme know the impact of this.
Thanks in Adavance,
Satya

The System always takes the reconciliation account stored into the Vendor master data.
Technically it is possible to change reconciliation account in vendor master record as follows:
1) SPRO -> Financial Accounting -> AR and AP -> Vendor accounts -> Master Records -> Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Records -> Define Screen Layout per Activity (Vendors) -> Change Vendor (Accounting) -> Company Code Data ->
Account management -> field 'Reconciliation account' set to 'optional entry'
2) Then system will allow you to change reconciliation account in vendor master record.
In general you can only change recon account when balance is zero.
"By changing the reconciliation account in the open item master record the proportionate values from the items open at the time of change are not posted to the new reconciliation account.
Hope this claifies.
Kind Regards
Soumya
Edited by: Soumya Rao on Oct 13, 2011 12:51 PM

Owner document change during the migration

Hello,
When we connect in IW on the referentiel BO V6 we use the identifiers 'SUPER' and to connect in the referentiel BO XI we use the identifiers of the user (for example for me is vgiquel and my password in the ldap). The user who use IW have a profile administrator in CMC.
When we migrate by categories with IW, documents appear in Infoview with the proprietaire of the document administrator.
We should migrate more than 200 documents with a user tomorrow and we have no solutions. Your collagues tell me to post a new thread for a search to know if it's a bug, ...or if there is a solution for help us.
Thanks for your quickly response
Valérie GIQUEL

The System always takes the reconciliation account stored into the Vendor master data.
Technically it is possible to change reconciliation account in vendor master record as follows:
1) SPRO -> Financial Accounting -> AR and AP -> Vendor accounts -> Master Records -> Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Records -> Define Screen Layout per Activity (Vendors) -> Change Vendor (Accounting) -> Company Code Data ->
Account management -> field 'Reconciliation account' set to 'optional entry'
2) Then system will allow you to change reconciliation account in vendor master record.
In general you can only change recon account when balance is zero.
"By changing the reconciliation account in the open item master record the proportionate values from the items open at the time of change are not posted to the new reconciliation account.
Hope this claifies.
Kind Regards
Soumya
Edited by: Soumya Rao on Oct 13, 2011 12:51 PM

Can an In-Design placed image change during the exporting of the page to PDF?

After exporting a spread to pdf in In-Design one of the images had been replaced by another which was on the same spread although they had completely different names. The image was correct in the In-Design and when the same spread was exported at a later date all images appeared correctly in the Pdf. Any ideas?

InDesign will never change an image with another one on PDF export.
But what kind of file type are you using?

Import status- import running does not change during the mass import of TR

Dear All,
I have successfully imported single requests in my newly installed SAP ECC EHP4 PRD system but when I have tried to import 8 transport requests(Mass Import) then the Import status is not changing from import running (Truck button still appears).
But the effect of the request is seen in the production system but the status does not change.
I have checked the logs and found that all the requests have been imported successfully but the Truck status does not change.
I have restated the system but no use still the same.
Thanks in Advance...
Latha

Import Running for a long time on ECC 6.0
The background job RDDIMPDP is running on client 000 as well as the relevant client.
Below is the TP System Log:
WARNING: System CC6. Warning. 20090914042136 :
WARNING: Background job not running properly. Function: G Jobcount: 04512801 Status: S.
Please check the system. Use transactions SM21, SM37, SM50.
WARNING: (This warning is harmless if no further warnings follow.)
As per NOTE: 26966, it could be b'cause the background job process slots are occupied,
Regards
Vikas Nagar

Cursor does not change during the editing of clips

Hi. I am new to iMovie and am looking for some help. I have imported my clips, put them in my timeline and I want to shorten the clips. According to the movie that is on the Apple web site, when moving my cursor over the line separating my clips, my cursor is to 'change' allowing me to shorten the clip. Well, my cursor does not change. Is there a setting that needs to be corrected. Thanks for any help that can be offered.

Hi konrad - the View Menu DOES have a 'Show Clip Volume Levels" IF you are using iMovie HD!
But according to your Profile you have iMovie 4. Volume control in that version is at the bottom beneath the Timeline Audio tracks.
Hope this helps clear up your confusion.
Better to use the iMovie 4 forum in your case!:-)

Current 3.6.3 version works fine on my laptop; however, when i download the update version, 3.6.4, it will download but i can't open any internet sites and firefox says it refuses the proxy server settings, which never changed during the download

when mozilla opens up automatically after download, the message that the proxy server settings are refused comes up on the opening mozilla screen. it also says it cannot recognize any websites that i try to load.

hello jlzibell, please go through the troubleshooting steps described at [[Websites say cookies are blocked - Unblock them]].

Vendor Change in MIRO

Dear All,
At the time of MIRO entry, the system has automatically generated the invoice for some other vendor and not from the PO.
We have checked the partner functions also...it is same PO vendor.
Ordering Address
Ship to Party
Invoice to party
These are all same vendor, but in the MIRO document and FI document it has taken some other vendor. And there is no alternative payee also, want to know what are the tables or how can we find wether the user or the system made a wrong pick of the vendor.

Hi
Please check the Vendor master record for the partner function.
1) Purchasing organisation level
2) Alternative data for plant level.
Thanks / Karthik

Excise Value change during Part 1 and 2

Dear SAP Gurus,
1.)Requirement is that material store person should not interfere in the excise transaction not even in part-1, but the doubt is as per my knowledge part -1 can only be done before the GR or during the GR (along with GR). and client want part -1 and 2 can only be done by FI person so how to meet the requirment.
2.) and if no alternative is there on above the Part-1 is happening during the GR , then material store person should not change any thing in Excise duties. and if the requirement is to change the excise duties , it can be changes during the Part -2 .
Please suggest how to meet the requirment.
Thanks & Regards
Nitin Chhabra

hi,
Matain the proper box checked and unchecked in EXCISE GROUP SETTING in such a way that
it will Disable the following otions at MIGO
post excise invoice option
only captre invoice option
it will enable the following option
only part1
this will allow stores person to post only part one entries.There will not be any interference by stores person in excise duties.
then after GR fi person can capture excise invoice through J1IEX by refering the material document.
regards,
SNB

Group ID Changed During Mac OS X 10.5 Upgrade

I have just discovered that my Group ID was changed during the upgrade from Mac OS X 10.4.10 to Mac OS X 10.5.
Prior to upgrading, my User ID was mcc and my Group ID was admin. After upgrading, my User ID remains mcc but my Group ID has been changed to mcc.
Ownership of files in my home directory hierarchy were changed to mcc:mcc. Ownership of files in other directories were not changed and retain the old mcc:admin ownership.
Under "classic" Unix ownerhip rules, I still own the files. However, there seems to be change in ownership policy under Mac OS X 10.5. I cannot make any changes to the files because they are in the "admin" group.
This change has a significant impact on the value of Time Machine as it prevents it from being used to restore system files that have been corrupted. Why is Time Machine backing up all files when there is no mechanism for restoring files other than those in the user's home directory hierarchy?

Given the above, I would expect to be able to modify, change, or delete any file with ownership set to mcc:admin without using sudo.
Agreed.
Actually, the more interesting question is why was group mcc created.
Yes, perhaps for backwards compatibility if you did an upgrade...
I don't recall it as existing in earlier releases of Mac OS X.
Because I think the opposite is true. Tiger, at least, always created a group for each user, with the same name and with gid=uid. It is Leopard that uses the staff group instead of a unique group per user.

Diadem V9.1 SP2c - DAT Files parameter settings change during work

Hello,
we use Diadem V9.1 SP2c in our company. There are a lot of colleagues using this software.
We use also parallel Diadem V6 / V8.
If we store Data (.DAT format) with V9 (Settings: ANSI, REAL32,..) the settings of the parameters change during the work with V9!!!
Originally I made a startscript setting up all these parameters in the right way.
What can I do, do avoid these changes in V9 during work? Older Versions can't open this data generated with V9 e.g. 'UNICODE' settings!
Thanks!

Hi again,
I am a little confused about the fact, that Diadem worked withe the wanted settings for a while and than changes the settings by itself somehow.
We dont know of any problem, where Diadem changes settings "by itself".
A possible reason for the problem might be a failure in the script.
If you change the settings without running the startscript (just via the Diadem Menu), does the settings change back after a while, too?
Regards,
Stefan Henke
NIG

Is there a change in the way 10g sees the rowid column.

i have two databases in my test environment
1. Oracle 10g on CentOS 5.3
2. Oracle 9i on Windows Server 2003
i am practicing simple SQL with the default HR schema created while creating databases using dbca.
all i am doing is trying to display the employee with the 10th highest salary.
in Oracle 10g i run the following command:
SQL> select first_name || ' ' || last_name, salary from employees where
rowid =
(select rowid from (select first_name || ' ' || last_name from employees order by salary desc) where rownum <=10
minus
select rowid from (select first_name || ' ' || last_name from employees order by salary desc) where rownum < 10);
FIRST_NAME||''||LAST_NAME                          SALARY
Lisa Ozer                                           11500when i run the same command in 9i
select first_name || ' ' || last_name, salary from employees where
rowid =
(select rowid from (select first_name || ' ' || last_name from employees order by salary desc) where rownum <=10
minus
select rowid from (select first_name || ' ' || last_name from employees order by salary desc) where rownum < 10)
no rows selectedon digging deeper i found out that in 9i .... when i run the two sub-queries, give the same rowid as output.
SQL> select rowid from (select first_name || ' ' || last_name from employees order by salary desc) where rownum <=10;
ROWID
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
10 rows selected.
SQL> select rowid from (select first_name || ' ' || last_name from employees order by salary desc) where rownum < 10;
ROWID
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
AAAHM7AAFAAAABXAAI
9 rows selected.the same two queries in 10g give different rowids (this is correct)
SQL> select rowid from (select first_name || ' ' || last_name from employees order by salary desc) where rownum <=10;
ROWID
AAAMg3AAFAAAABYAAA
AAAMg3AAFAAAABYAAB
AAAMg3AAFAAAABYAAC
AAAMg3AAFAAAABYAAt
AAAMg3AAFAAAABYAAu
AAAMg3AAFAAAABUAAD
AAAMg3AAFAAAABUAAH
AAAMg3AAFAAAABYAAI
AAAMg3AAFAAAABYAAv
AAAMg3AAFAAAABYABE
10 rows selected.
SQL> select rowid from (select first_name || ' ' || last_name from employees order by salary desc) where rownum < 10;
ROWID
AAAMg3AAFAAAABYAAA
AAAMg3AAFAAAABYAAB
AAAMg3AAFAAAABYAAC
AAAMg3AAFAAAABYAAt
AAAMg3AAFAAAABYAAu
AAAMg3AAFAAAABUAAD
AAAMg3AAFAAAABUAAH
AAAMg3AAFAAAABYAAI
AAAMg3AAFAAAABYAAv
9 rows selected.is there a change in the way Oracle 10g treats rowids from subqueries?
when i change the query to include the rowid in the innermost sub-query things work as they should in both 10g and 9i
select first_name || ' ' || last_name, salary from employees where
rowid =
(select rowid from (select rowid,first_name || ' ' || last_name from employees order by salary desc) where rownum <=10
minus
select rowid from (select rowid,first_name || ' ' || last_name from employees order by salary desc) where rownum < 10)

OK,
I didn't seem to have made myself clear. You state
'the above query uses rownum to filter the top 10 and top 9 salaries and picks the person with the 10th highest salary.'
As you are using row*id* , and rowids are random strings, and can change during the life of your table, you can not rely on the results of your query.
Your usage of the rownum pseudo function (as opposed to the rownum analytical function is also incorrect, as rownum is assigned prior to ordering it.
This
        select * from
         (select rownum rn, ename, sal
          from
          (select ename, sal from scott.emp order by sal desc)
          where rn=10is quite as sufficient, and doesn't use hacks like rowid.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA
Experts: those who did read documentation.

When someone other than myself downloads an image from my web album, a dynamically generated file name replaces the original file name. How I can prevent the original file name being replaced during the downloading process?

When someone other than myself downloads an image from my web album, a dynamically generated file name replaces the original file name. How I can prevent the file name being changed during this downloading process?

Hi Glenyse,
Here are my steps.
1. I upload multiple image (jpg) files onto my photo album.
2. I select the "sharing" by email option for this album.
3. I enter the recipient's email address.
4. The recipient receives my message and clicks on the link.
5. The recipient accesses my photo album and clicks on one of the images.
6. The image opens up to its own screen.
7. The recipient selects the "download" and then save file option.
Here is the part I do not understand. For some reason, during this "download" process, the original name which I have given to the file is replaced by different name. So I was hoping that someone knows how to prevent the file name from being changed during the "download and save" process.
Much appreciated if you can help me find a solution to this problem.
Mary

How ADF BC can cope with unexpected changes to the underlying database

Hi all,
i have been experimenting with Fusion Web Applications based on ADF BCs for a few weeks now. The framework is, indeed, very powerful but i wonder if it is flexible too and, in particular, if it is able to smoothly adapt to changes occurring on the underlying database. I have some doubts about that cause, in some circumstances, i found myself in the need of modifying the database structure (removing or adding columns or constraints to tables) and, though i was able to quickly and easily reflect those changes to entity and view objects thanks to ADF synchronization, the consequent adaptation of the existing JSPXs based on the previous definition of the view objects was quite painful: i found very hard to reflect the changes to the JSPXs and, in some cases, i had to rewrite the pages from scratch!
Since the company i work for is projecting to use ADF for realizing a web application backed by a very large database (which i bet will undergo to numerous changes during the development phase!) i'd like to know if there is something i'm missing here and to ask you some advices on the recommended approaches to develop agile and flexible Fusion Web Applications with ADF BCs.
Thanks in advance, bye!
Fabio

user1113055 wrote:
... the consequent adaptation of the existing JSPXs based on the previous definition of the view objects was quite painful: i found very hard to reflect the changes to the JSPXs and, in some cases, i had to rewrite the pages from scratch! You will need to be more specific about the issues that you have encountered. Synchronization and refactoring is supported in JDeveloper for the model, the view and the controller. For what it's worth, take a look at these entry-level posts that could provide some additional inside:
http://jdeveloperfaq.blogspot.com/2010/02/faq-15-how-to-synchronize-adf-entity.html
http://jdeveloperfaq.blogspot.com/2010/04/faq-20-how-to-refactor-adf-components.html

Checks on vendors during the creation of PO with ME21N

Hi all,
i have this problem:
during the creation of a Purchase Order, for some types of them i have to bypass some checks that are made by standard on the Vendor.
Is it possibile to do? if it is, how can i do it?
Thanks
Lello

Hi
If they are standard controls, probably it'll mean to change the standard program: if your SAP release is ECC 6.00 u can try to use the Implicit Enhancement in order to change the standard else u need to register the standard to OSS in order to get the access key for modification.
Max

Vendor changed during the MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for